'Ugly' Australian animals attract less research

Discussion in 'Biology & Genetics' started by Plazma Inferno!, Mar 8, 2016.

  1. Plazma Inferno! Ding Ding Ding Ding Administrator

    Messages:
    4,610
    Australian scientists reviewed the published literature for each of Australia's 331 mammal species, and found they broadly fell into three categories: monotremes and marsupials (the 'good') – with most studies focused on physiology and anatomy; introduced mammals such as cats, foxes and rabbits (the 'bad') – with research focused on population control; and native rodents and bats (the 'ugly') – which they said have been largely overlooked in the research literature.
    According to the researchers, the "small size and cryptic behaviour" of these 'ugly' species can make them difficult to study, resulting in poor conservation and management.

    Research paper: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mam.12066/epdf
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. iceaura Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    30,994
    So Australia has at least 83 species of bats, not counting a couple that have gone extinct recently. And nobody knows very much about most of them.

    I did not expect to read that.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.

Share This Page