UFO's and why they blink out.

Discussion in 'UFOs, Ghosts and Monsters' started by river, Mar 12, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. river

    Messages:
    12,760
    B

    But it doesn't matter dywdyr ; this thread is about experience and investigation into these things.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. river

    Messages:
    12,760
    Well have you directly investigated my OP ? No ; you just wonder off ........
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,947
    So your response when coming across something you don't know about (but which impacts directly on a claim you've made) is to laugh and dismiss it?
    So much for "knowledge" and "investigating"...

    And, as I've shown numerous times, your "experience and investigation" is considerably less than mine.

    Really?
    So the two objections I raised don't count as "investigating your OP"?
    I showed how your conclusion is fatally flawed - that's hardly "wandering off".

    All I can say is that you should be really thankful that Sciforums has set such a low bar on acceptable intellectual standards (and honesty), otherwise you'd have to ramble your insanities elsewhere.
     
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2016
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. river

    Messages:
    12,760
    .

    No we are about the same.

    I support the thousands of observations by many credited people ; while you do not.

    In the end d; we will disagree ; oh well
     
  8. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,947
    Shown to be a lie several times.
    In addition your laughing dismissal of my argument show that you DON'T investigate, you simply go with the answer that suits your preconceptions.

    Also false.
    There aren't "thousands of observations by many credited people" nor do you appeal to those - most of your crap is predicated on the witless claims by unqualified (and, for the vast majority, scientifically ignorant[1]) authors who make claims without having made such observations.

    1 Something you share with them.
     
  9. river

    Messages:
    12,760
    The thing is d; people witness these objects everyday
     
  10. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,947
    People may well "witness" something.
    But that does NOT mean they're actual objects, nor does it necessarily mean they're craft of any sort (other than, in any cases, misidentified ordinary aircraft).
    Nor does THAT mean that your inane claim in the OP is in any way correct, nor your (implicit but false) claims to know something about"advanced propulsion".
     
  11. river

    Messages:
    12,760
    What several lies ?

    Lets get this over with ; what lies ?

    One at time d.

    And d ; we will start this discussion ; on my supposed lies in a new thread ; titled by you.

    I await this new ; now
     
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2016
  12. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,947
    LEARN TO READ.
    I didn't say "several lies" I wrote "Shown to be a lie several times" - and we go through this about once every 3 or 4 weeks.
    I am more widely read on the subject than you.
    I check the "background" of the "information" given in those books.
    I investigate far further than do you.

    This has been shown the last 3 (if not 4 or 5) times that you brought up the subject of T. T. Brown (and each time I mention the fact that YOUR "knowledge" is severely lacking your carefully cultivated selective memory kicks in and you ask for support for my claims: these were given to you (with links) the first couple of times you asked and you resort to the exact same dishonest tactic each time I refute your (incorrect) assertion that "we are about the same".
     
  13. river

    Messages:
    12,760
    You say I'm dishonest ; well start a thread between you and me ; just ; you and me ; I await the thread . I'm calling you out d.

    river
     
  14. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,947
    You are: you have made (implicit) claims in this thread (i.e. not even consdering your general posting history) that you have failed to support.
    You have dismissed arguments made in this this thread on the basis that you don't know what they say (and you're ether too lazy or too mired in your fixed viewpoint to go and learn).
    You have queried something that has been shown to you more than once and pretended[1] - again - that you don't what I'm talking about.

    Uh wait. If YOU are calling me out then shouldn't YOU be the one to start the thread?
    Or is this yet more of your intellectual dishonesty? If I don't start the thread (which I won't because it will probably be against forum rules) then you'll be claiming that I can't back up my arguments...

    1 Although I grant that it may not be a pretence: you could (like a number of other posters here) be so wedded to your false and insupportable views that you're incapable of registering and retaining contrary information. In which case, my apologies: it's possible that such an intellectual defect is probably worse than a lack of honesty - at least for you.
     
  15. river

    Messages:
    12,760
    I await the thread ; d
     
  16. river

    Messages:
    12,760
    That is point of this thread.

    Not of the observation ; since for many , thousands ; they have seen what they have seen.

    It seems though that these calculations have been a thorn .

    Oh well

    river
     
  17. Russ_Watters Not a Trump supporter... Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,051
    Exchemist and I think scientifically and are well in touch with reality. Your "thinking differently" is to embrace gibberish, fantasy and conspiracy theory. It certainly is different!
     
  18. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,947
    Then start it.

    This is yet another lie.
    The "thorn" is your insupportable, incorrect and multiply-refuted conclusion, not the calculations themselves.
     
  19. Russ_Watters Not a Trump supporter... Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,051
    It can be fun to slap river around, but he's just trolling here. Nobody could be as stupid as he's pretending to be and still be capable of operating a computer.
     
  20. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,137
    This thread has gone off-topic and has been reduced to nothing more than member-bashing. By definition, ad hominems are off-topic; I ask that we knock them off and address the arguments, not the person.

    If they have been addressed, and the OP chooses to ignore that, that's really his problem, not ours.

    I'm as guilty as anyone, but it's really ground the thread to a halt now.
     
  21. Magical Realist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,537
    Looks like the local Science Gestapo has found another lone member to kick and punch to the ground. Is this what science is all about?
     
  22. Magical Realist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,537
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2016
  23. river

    Messages:
    12,760
    It seems to be. None of them have any class at all . NONE

    What is worse is that the younger people on this site see this Attitude by members and think that it is okay to behave this way towards others. It is NOT okay at all.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page