Discussion in 'Religion Archives' started by Medicine*Woman, Jun 14, 2010.
Whats your point exactly?.
Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.
Nope. You're still eminently ignorable.
Did you not read my first post on this subject?
I'll repeat it for the hard of understanding:
You went through all that to tell me he is better at spelling?.
And again you miss the point.
No I didn't go through all that to tell you he's better at spelling - I told you that back in post 114.
I went through this to show that
A) you don't keep track of what YOU write (i.e. your question about "when did I ask") and
B) your failure to follow a point is not limited to other threads. It seems to be a consistent trait with you.
Which would be any and all of them.
You are a diss-Honest person.
Says the hypocrite.
Please show where I've been dishonest.
Indicate the posts and quote them.
Otherwise admit you're lying or mistaken.
I did show where you was not honest, go and read the convosation If you cannot keep track of all that has been said then it's your fault for not being thorough. I am not going to spoon feed you sorry but I am not playing this game with you.
Peace be with you. <-- every time I type that I mean it, yes to you also even now.
You made a claim that was subsequently shown to be in error.
Why repeat it later?
Yes, you state you mean peace but it doesn't prevent your hypocrisy or lies. How strange.
Ok let me try this in the most lay term possible.
I asked him if he believes he is more lerned than I am, I Did not ask how lerned He is. I asked what his beliefs on it were. Regardl-less of his or my belief on the matter It would not indicate who is more lerned.
Do you comprehend the difference between asking what somebody believes and asking what the facts of the matter are in actual comparison and judgement.
Peace. and over-standing be with you. Not "Stand-Under".
It simply matched your claim (without support) that I don't understand.
Wrong again. You have consistently failed to provide rational or viable support for your contentions, especially in the nuclear weapons "debate" - in fact in that one you actually wrote:
Do you obfuscate for the sake of it or are your "thought processes" (I use the term loosely in your case, of course) truly that incoherent?
Then let me reiterate my previous question:
If he'd answered in the affirmative you wouldn't have wanted confirmation?
Do you seriously expect anyone to believe that if he'd claimed to be more learned than you you'd simply have said "Ok, I accept that you actually are"?
Yes. A nonsensical phrase if ever there was one.
Why must you always think with calculating negative intentions, I asked him a question because I wanted to know the answer to it. I Wanteds to see if he thought he was more lerned than me.
If he said yes i would have said, Hmm I see,
If he said no i would have said, Hmm I see.
Or something of that nature of response if not that exact response. Now I am to assume you will not "have faith" and say Im lying so you are not proven to be incorrect about your own ranting.
Peace and wisdom be with you.
You're assuming again. I've told you about that.
So, essentially, whatever he answered you'd have replied the same way. And found out very little.
You have lied. More than once in another thread, what's to stop you doing it here?
Quote my Lies please and source them.
Peace and Patience be upon me.
Then addressed to me:
Plus the generalised
And the far-reaching
Please explain how they are not insults.
So on one hand you claim you don't lie then in the same post you raise the possibility that your posts may not be what you what you actually mean.
Please explain how posting something you don't believe is not a lie. Or how raising the possibility the it could be a lie is not dishonest if you do believe it, i.e. an indirect lie.
Take my posts out of context and them claim each one is directed as an insult witht he intention to offend, because thats what an insult is. You can be offended by somebodys politeness it doesnt mean they were insulting you.
You are a simpleton because even to this point you have not once acknowledged that you twisted around my wwords and changed the meaning of them and you just stop talking about it and have failed to even address the fact that i pointed it out to you.
Western people are generaly dirty to me, dogs are generaly dirty to me. am i insulting the dog for not being as clean as a cat? no im not im stating its dirtyness.
i asked you tons of questions and I have not got answers to most of them so dont then in turn break down 20 seperate questions for me in your posts like you usualy do to try and have more things to argue against.
You dont argue witht he topic or the OP, you directly attack people all the time I just read through your thread and post history. you are not a nice person sir and im being honest are you "insulted" by this? because i am not trying to effend you and I dont wish for you to do anything but become a positive person before you die.
You come here to argue, Anyone who questions this should read his Post History.
I dont come here to argue like a child, I come here to teach people and share expressions, also I use sci-forums to conduct study's on people and test my teaching ability's to improve them.
What do you come here for?, You come here to learn? you seek the answers to life in words of modern man and science?, you seek a way to become immortal?. you come here to vent and argue?.
peace be with thee Gentile.
I can say the same thing in three different languages.
Who said I am not doing the same thing? Who said I am not a teacher? You are failing in your teaching abilities, you don't teach me
anything putting me down, there are several teaching methods please read the following
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teaching_methodng me down, and trying to
Separate names with a comma.