But you just said that, if given the power, you would kill every man, woman, and child on earth. That is morally reprehensible, it is selfish, it is evil. Even Hitler only wanted to kill the Jews, you'd kill us all.
Sure, but you'd sacrifice everyone for no one! So it's only your lack of power that preventa you from committing the greatest atrocity ever imagined? And you think using an emoticon with a smiley face mitigates the immorality of such a desire?
Enmos...we humans see you as a threat to us...we are the supreme rulers of this universe, your ambitions are against our desires...
Huh ? :bugeye: I notice you are getting emotional.. ? Maybe I can't do when it really comes to it. I would happily embrace any scenario that avoids removing humans. Necessary evil ?
As simply correcting this, including linking to the correct figures etc, has proven fruitless, we must continue to swat it on each individual appearance. According to the people who measure such things, a little less than 40% of the CO2 in the air over your head at the moment was generated by fossil fuel combustion.
Typical draqon. Enmos: What I think is so disturbing to the rest of us is where you're placing your priorities. Generally speaking, it's humans first, everything else later. ie. if you had to choose between saving every animal within 10 acres of a forest and saving a human, which would you do?
What if 'humans first' means death to all, including humans ? Wouldn't it then make sense to save 'everything else' ? Isolated event ? Saving the human. Not saving the human would have no impact whatsoever.
Enmos if you had 100 baby mice and one human...but could only save either 100 mice or one human...who would you save?
But at current pace all ecosystems would be utterly destroyed. There just too many humans, we are already in the midst of a mass extinction.
Maybe it would be more 'acceptable' if you view it like this: Would you die for your loved one if you knew it would save her ?