Time Travel is Science Fiction

[paddoboy]

wrong thread

 

[Undefined]

Forum/Moderator: Trolls repeating/linking inane facile 'me too' irrelevances is all all that these mindless discussion-clutterers have in lieu of any cogent argument addressing the actual points raised by the OP. Isn't that what Tach was permabanned for? At least Tach actually knew SOME things. Unlike this latest totally clueless paddo-noise-maker' bot program.

 

[dumbest man on earth]

Forum/Moderator: Trolls repeating/linking inane facile 'me too' irrelevances is all all that these mindless discussion-clutterers have in lieu of any cogent argument addressing the actual points raised by the OP. Isn't that what Tach was permabanned for? At least Tach actually knew SOME things. Unlike this latest totally clueless paddo-noise-maker' bot program.

Undefined, not sure that all the Mods/Admins pay that much attention to these Forums.

The Mods for this Forum are : prometheus, AlphaNumeric and Pete.

You can try the "Report Icon".

 

[Undefined]

Hi dmoe.

Undefined, not sure that all the Mods/Admins pay that much attention to these Forums.

The Mods for this Forum are : prometheus, AlphaNumeric and Pete.

You can try the "Report Icon".

Seems like!

Pete was a good and fair one. He is busy with this new career after graduating. His absence is a real blow for this site's moderation standards.

[Good luck Pete!]

Tried reporting. Not a peep from the mod(s).

Stay well, dmoe. Bye.

 

[Dr_Toad]

More drivelly woo.

 

[krash661]

found them all to be the most puerile pop sci. I don't need to look at them again because they probably still are.

it's always the " want to be-s" with no experience nor proper education , who say such things.

 

[krash661]

I have to say that IMHO paddoboy tends to defend popscience woo to the death, and brings emotion and outrage and insult and disruption to the discussion rather than sincerity and logic and evidence and argument.

for me, this appears to be hypocritical and contradicting, coming from you.

This is just nonsense for kids. Time dilation is not time travel. I could send you on a fast trip or leave you for a while in a region of low gravitational potential, and you will suffer time dilation. There's less motion in your local clock than mine, that's all. And that isn't time travel. I could watch you every step of the way, you don't appear in the middle of next week.

as obvious as it can be, you are completely clueless to anything about/involving time.
this is far advance of a topic for most here on it this topic.
and it shows.

 

[krash661]

The subject of this thread is time travel can not be true.

We invented time, time is an invention by humanity to record our own existence, a pink invisible unicorn that does not have a relationship to space. Time and space is not entangled.

If time is invented, how can you travel back through an invention that does not exist, except in the form of an invisible pink unicorn?.

Time dilation of an atom is explained by physics. The steady state of gravity on the ground being different to that at altitude.

Muons are by timing,

GPS is explained by distance displacement by curvature.

''If time did not exist we would not be here, and the BB would not have happened.''

Yes it would, but no one would be here to observe it had happened and added a time scale to it.

my pink with emerald eyes pegasus needs a mate.

 

[krash661]

all i have seen from this topic, from the majority , is
nothing but clueless individuals spewing.

The subject of this thread is time travel can not be true.

We invented time, time is an invention by humanity to record our own existence, a pink invisible unicorn that does not have a relationship to space. Time and space is not entangled.

If time is invented, how can you travel back through an invention that does not exist, except in the form of an invisible pink unicorn?.

Time dilation of an atom is explained by physics. The steady state of gravity on the ground being different to that at altitude.

Muons are by timing,

GPS is explained by distance displacement by curvature.

''If time did not exist we would not be here, and the BB would not have happened.''

Yes it would, but no one would be here to observe it had happened and added a time scale to it.

this is far advanced for you.
"
Capability dismissal
The Employment Rights Act makes capability a fair reason for dismissal. Capability is defined as ‘capability assessed by reference to skill, aptitude, health or any other physical or mental quality’. It means that where an employee is not able to do his job for one of the reasons listed below, provided that procedure is followed correctly, it will be fair to dismiss.

There are two questions that need to be addressed for a capability dismissal to be in order.

1. Does the employer honestly believe this employee is incompetent or unsuitable for the job?
2. Are his grounds for that belief reasonable?

An employer will have to produce evidence of poor performance and show that this was the real reason for dismissing the employee.
"

 

[Landau Roof]

when i do decided to read one of your post, i'm always lead to the same thought.
this thought is,
your comprehension skills are very poor.
you hardly understand anything that is typed.

it's always the " want to be-s" with no experience nor proper education , who say such things.

Amusing!

 

[krash661]

You say that as if it were an accomplished fact. As if the human perception of history were as real as a river or planetary path. You claim to be a scientist, yet you accept things on faith. Does not a 'time line' refer to past time? How can there be known future time lines? How can we reverse all that has ever happened and undo all that physical motion that has occurred? (Shakes head)

amusing
it would be nice if you had the capacity and capability to understand topics like this.
just accept that this is far advance for you and just listen for once.
if you accomplish this, then maybe some us will not be annoyed by your ignorant mouth running you tend to do so frequently.
in a sense your like an attention whore.
just goes around any topic and states something silly or ridiculous, only because they are attempting to impress someone with fraudulent knowledge, and does not realize how obvious it is.

 

[Farsight]

Doublepost deleted.

 

[Farsight]

If someone could manage to travel back into the past, and did something to potentially change future events, he would create another time line. All speculative stuff at this time, but none disallowed by the laws of physics and GR.

It's all science fiction, there are no time travellers, and it is disallowed by the laws of physics and GR. The people who say it isn't don't understand GR and they don't understand closed timelike curves. They're quacks peddling woo, and probably a popscience book too.

Yes you do...You start many threads to bait people and spread your woo concepts. That is evident in some of your threads being closed and others moved to the fringe sections.

I don't bait people, I refer to Einstein whilst you peddle woo, the moderators on this forum are a lot less knowledgeable than me about physics, and you've lost the argument so now you're just trolling.

You say that as if it were an accomplished fact...

For some weird reason we get these people who know f*ck-all physics and who cling to popscience woo and try to trash every thread. You just can't have a sincere conversation with them.

Or perhaps the situation of a time machine moving forward on Earth (in my living room) would be akin to jumping inside a train. I mean, like when you are standing inside a speeding commuter train and suddenly jump high. You don't go flying toward the back of the car and smashing into the door - you move with (and relative to) the train. Perhaps time travel, if it were possible, would be like that. Yet, even then if I traveled say 250 years into the future, I have no way of knowing if my living room at its present height from the ground is still where it is now. I would not know if this location is underwater or perhaps some part of a new building. I could arrive 250 years hence partly in a concrete wall or floor - how could I or my time machine possibly know in advance...?

It couldn't. But remember we can freeze human embryos now. If there was a way to freeze (and successfully thaw) adults, then your "time machine" is a mere refrigerator. There can never be any "time machine" that magically disappears from your living room for 250 years before ding, making a magical reappearance. All that stuff is just a fairy tale. A fantasy. Popscience woo for starry-eyed suckers.

 

[krash661]

For some weird reason we get these people who know f*ck-all physics and who cling to popscience woo and trash every thread with nonsense and abuse. You just can't have a sincere conversation with them.

please state your career experience in science.
then please state what you're working on as a PhD holder.
ohh just tumble weeds blowing in the streets.
(shrugs)who would have thought.

farsight as obvious as it is, your disabled mentality does not realize that, that is all you have ever posted, nothing more.

 

[krash661]

All that stuff is just a fairy tale. A fantasy.

just like your understanding of actual science huh.

 

[Landau Roof]

It's all science fiction, there are no time travellers, and it is disallowed by the laws of physics and GR. The people who say it isn't don't understand GR and they don't understand closed timelike curves. They're quacks peddling woo, and probably a popscience book too.

I don't bait people, I refer to Einstein whilst you peddle woo, the moderators on this forum are a lot less knowledgeable than me about physics, and you've lost the argument so now you're just trolling.

For some weird reason we get these people who know f*ck-all physics and who cling to popscience woo and try to trash every thread. You just can't have a sincere conversation with them.

It couldn't. But remember we can freeze human embryos now. If there was a way to freeze (and successfully thaw) adults, then your "time machine" is a mere refrigerator. There can never be any "time machine" that magically disappears from your living room for 250 years before ding, making a magical reappearance. All that stuff is just a fairy tale. A fantasy. Popscience woo for starry-eyed suckers.

Yes. I see it often here. These "working scientists" claim all religious belief is fantasy, but you tell them Star Trek isn't real and they resort to name-calling and throw tantrums.

 

[krash661]

It's all science fiction, there are no time travellers, and it is disallowed by the laws of physics and GR. The people who say it isn't don't understand GR and they don't understand closed timelike curves. They're quacks peddling woo, and probably a popscience book too.

i do not have a book at all. i'm not allowed to publish anything publicly.
anything the team or i find has to be published to security clearance servers.
oh wait, do you not have a book ?

 

[krash661]

Yes. I see it often here. These "working scientists" claim all religious belief is fantasy, but you tell them Star Trek isn't real and they resort to name-calling and throw tantrums.

cute.
it's like the little engine that could.

 

[Farsight]

Yes. I see it often here. These "working scientists" claim all religious belief is fantasy, but you tell them Star Trek isn't real and they resort to name-calling and throw tantrums.

That's pretty much how it is. The Catholics sneer at the Heathens. The Protestants sneer at the Catholics. The Atheists sneer at the Protestants. Only some of the Atheists think the universe is made of mathematics. Or is a hologram. When you challenge conviction, people react with emotion. Even when they're scientists who think they're rational. Unless they've looked in the mirror. That's what Matt was on about with the conviction bias. And why I said shifting conviction is like shifting a tooth. You have to keep up the pressure. NB: please do not feed the troll.

 

[krash661]

LOL. You're kidding yourself. You're a naysayer who clings to ignorance and woo, and who dismisses Einstein and the patent blatant scientific evidence, and anything else that challenges your popscience convictions that don't make sense.

ahh, i think i understand your nonsense now.
your one of those mentality disabled individuals that goes around accusing everyone else of the actions that the mentality disabled person is doing and/or does.
i think i get it now.