Ah geez, I don't know.. Perhaps because I apologised and stopped and didn't keep defending it or repeating it? LG never once apologised to me for what he said to me, instead, he doubled down and became more offensive. I apologised and did not repeat or bring it up again. And if you think it was condoned, think again. My comments were wholly offensive and out of line. Hence why I apologised to him. Huge difference is that I apologised for what I said to him and did it in public and it was sincere. The abject irony, of course, is that in his misrepresenting what was actually said, he deliberately leaves out the part where I apologised and did not repeat the offensive comments. LG on the other hand kept bringing it up and I did not raise to the bait. Why? Because it was bad enough the first time. But that did not stop him misrepresenting it for weeks on end while completely disregarding the fact that I had apologised to him and had stopped but he would not stop. Perhaps that had something to do with it? What do you think CK? You want my head on a stick? You have it. As for Balerion, he had better provide evidence that this whole utter mess was somehow contrived or that there was collusion. I'll give you all a hint. There never was. My comments about this matter were all on public record in the moderator's forum. There was no collusion. Several moderators were taking part in the discussion in the back room. And if Balerion thinks that I'm going to sit here like a good little girl to let him lecture me or tell me whether I was sexually harassed or not, too bad. Not going to happen. I am hardly going to let a guy who was not even here and who has openly made comments about me that were so offensive on another forum (yes Balerion, where do you think the Frostbite title comes from? What you said was so offensive and bad, that a forum that allows anything and everything had to delete it) - really, for him to lecture anyone about what constitutes sexual harassment is laughable. The irony is that none of you were there. None of you took part in that discussion. My reporting sexual harassment was a private matter to the staff. None of you get to lecture me about 'pfft, that's not sexual harassment'. Why? Because none of you were part of that discussion. You are merely people who come by the issue days later and decide 'wait, no, must protest and make things up in the process to justify the protest and anger'. Which is essentially what is going on here. Let me be clear about something here.. The vote that saw LG's ban remain permanent was not collusion or an attempt at a cover up, it was merely a poll which allowed all the staff to offer their opinion. As I said, you want my head on a stick, you have it. But I will smack you all with the damn stick (and just to be clear, that was in a manner of speaking - not a threat - because I just know some of you will declare "it's a threat!") if you are going to start waving it around and lying and misrepresenting something that you are all only interested in because certain moderators are involved.