There was and is a Palestinian nation

actually it does bear me out. Now would you please quit goading me. I'm not going to fall for it and you just going to get yourself banned.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Then provide citation and reference.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

I will just a soon as you tell me how does one cite 1000 years worth of history? The body of evidence in its entirety supports me. It isn't an individual thing. But if you really must need 100o years worth reduced this is a start
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jews_i...d_the_Golden_Age_.28711_to_twelfth_century.29

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Exactly and very simple infact; Just compare the "bodycount" between the two before and after 1880 as we all know jews lived as a minority in Palestine along with Arabs long before the colonialist implementation of zionism.

...and not in Spain, or China for that matter. Looking at the stats it is simply impossible to conclude that zionism or the state of Israel has brought stability and peace in the region between the two.

 

Like Algeria and Iran?

 

Because Palestinian terrorists launch their fucking rockets every single day...

 

The distant past doesn't count. We have a different situation now.

 

Dont give me that "which was first, the egg or the chicken?" crap. And cut the f-words, would you please. The rockets just like the risen deathtoll are consequences of the zionist policies and not that the other way around.

Considering that the palestinians are in equal situation as the polish were when Germany decided to settle their privledged genes in Poland, one can hardly blame them for shooting chinese firecrackers which kill a civilian every once in two months or so. In fact, just like every german who accepted the stolen houses and business' of polish people from the nazi regime, every Israeli settler in palestinian soil is guilty for the ethnic cleansing of palestinians, just like the perpretators themselves. In this regard palestinians are doing only what one would expect them to do, yet not enough.

 

Not really. Cut the Z-ionist words, would you please. Poland has nothing to do with Palestine... Because
1. Palestine never existed.
2. Palestine has not been conquered.
3. Palestinians refused citizenship.
4. Polish partisans targeted soldiers, not civilians.
Every Israeli settler is guilty... Unbelievable. Only the man that commits an homicide is guilty of murder and not his entire people or Israelis should slaughter all Palestinian population.

 

Because of zionism and people like you

??? what do you call annexation by military force?

Not going to accept taking their rights were legit

They went after some german settlers.

every settler is guilty because they are helping Israel violate international law.

 

I'm not Zionist, I'm atheist.
1. They were attacked and they conquered... Are you talking about the territories that were occupied during the Six-Day War? They aren't Palestine.
2. This is stupid.
3. This is cruel.
Your last statement is terrible and Israel didn't violate anything.

 

I split the two. and being atheist doesn't preclude you from being zionist. the 2 are not mutually exclusive.

They attacked and coquered. Most of the armies never left arab land and one army that did was so out of date it had to attack to have any hope of being effective.

??? yeah they are.

Yes calling annexation be military for not conquest is stupid.

yes it is cruel to deny the palestinians their rights.

Why because its true. And yes Israel has violated lots of things like the UN charter and the fourth geneva conventions.

 

I hate every religion and every stupid fundamentalist equally.
1. They were attacked.
2. Not really, since they were already part of other countries.
3. Not accepting Israeli citizenship is stupid.
4. Killing civilians is cruel.
No, it is wrong because it is against moral as well as common sense. And no, Israel is a recognized member of the UN hence Israel didn't violate anything.

 

no they attacked.

but you said they atatcked Israel which for the most part they didn't.

no it isn't its smart.

no using them as weapons was cruel.

??? this makes no sense. Just because they are a member of the UN doesn't mean the automaticaly follow the charter. and they have self determination so they violated the charter and population transfers against the 4th genva conventions

 

So...
1. Nasser was a saint.
2. Suffering for stupid reasons is smart.
3. Palestinians use their civilians as weapons and Israeli civilians as targets... Smartness all around.
Well, all the countries that violated something are no longer part of the UN.

 

Never said that but than when the facts don't support you.

No not taking a course of action that would confer legiatmacy on stripping them of their rights is smart.

A civilian transfered to occupied territory becomes a valid target thats why your not allowed to do so. and the palestinians civilians choose to they aren't being forced too.

Iraq,north korea, and the US are all a part of the UN and have violated international law.

 

The facts in the majority of cases don't support you.