As you confirm: whoever they are, they are - as I pointed out - ignorant and unseeing, especially of fascism (the New Deal was American fascism? Please.) Of course you don't. You don't see them even when they are paraded in front of you. I have pointed that out to you many times. You are ignorant of domestic US politics, and a gullible victim of US professional media manipulations (the bothsides schtick has been the US rightwing corporate authoritarian's main line for "respectable" media since W screwed the pooch - you parrot it perfectly). Going by your description, they do not see fascism coming. They think they are safe from Trump's destruction of sound governance. They think Trump will break the bad stuff. They prefer Trump to competent US governance. As you explained, you have bought into the rightwing US scaremonger's schtick that the Soviet era was a "bipolar" time. That was a story invented to sell big peacetime military budgets and various foreign wars to easily manipulated Americans. In addition, you continue to avoid the obvious and dominant contribution of Reagan and Bush to what you have agreed was a unipolar mess following the collapse of the Soviet Union. So you don't actually care about "unipolar" - you care about whatever the US Republican propaganda feed has emphasized recently. - - - The point being that it is inaccurate and quite silly agitprop vocabulary, and so it clearly marks the source of your opinions. Goofy errors like that - consistent and long term - cannot plausibly be relegated to coincidence. You are wrong about the averages. That is likely because you don't know anything about the details, which is what the averages would be averages of. That doesn't exist, in the first place. And you're probably wrong, in the second - the effects of AGW on rainfall patterns are almost certain to be detrimental to most agriculture in the near and mid term (next few hundred years). Possibly disastrous. The "climate" is unlikely to become more humid on average. That's not a prediction of AGW. But they are not implausible. And I have posted a great deal of justification, links, etc, in the past - including on these very matters. You learned nothing. Look, if you have made one thing clear on this forum it is this: You will learn nothing that conflicts with US wingnut propaganda feeds. The media feeds from the US corporate think tanks and wingnut welfare havens are holy writ to you. But that does not explain your posting of them here. The question is this: Why do you make these empty Republican Party Line claims of yours, without justification, that you know - as you have explicitly stated - are based in ignorance? Right down to characterizing the various investigations, lawsuits, and oppositions to Trump as a "manhunt".