The Sun and the solar system

I LIVE IN CA,.....

please... provide us with a link... showing that we have any neutrino evidense about neutron stars.... please...

seriosly...

if you cant cant... then admit it.... it doesnt exist.

-MT

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

The neutrino detectors do not use WATER as the detection agent.

Does MT really believe that the photographed and widely witnessed thermoneuclear device tests were hoaxes? If so, the smallest one used up an awful lot of gunpowder.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

NO...

and yes... if i remember corectly the neutrino detectors use clorine...

is that right?

and tests of h-bombs are not hoaxs... just the interpretation of the residual evidense..... dah.

-MT

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

If you say that h-bombs are not hoaxes, how can you say that fusion does not exist?

 

We have no way of observing what happens in a h-bomb explosion...

its all theory,.... and assumption.

and you know what happens when you assume...

we also know what happens when we place alot of high energy nuetrons close to alot of heavier elements...

transmutation...... thats what...

all of which can yield energy... which has nothing to do with fusion.

i.e.. fission is where its at...

-MT

 

The first detection of interstellar neutrinos was accomplished in 1987 in detectors in Japan and in U.S., in association with the optical detection of a supernova.

 

High energy neutrons and heavy elements are not especially explosive. Relatively low energy neutrons are what cause fission in fissionable material. I have read that experts have said that if a fission bomb were detonated sitting next to another fission bomb, the second one would not detonate because there would be far too few low energy neutrons.

 

SO.. is there any evidense of neutrinos from any specific neutron star???

no...

thankyou,
-MT

 

Why would there be neutrinos from a neutron star? You have really lost me on that one. I have been able to get a little bit of sense out of most of your halucinations until this one. There is no process theorized to be happening in a neutron star except for the zero point neutron dance, a very low energy activity.

 

Its really commendable that thoes guys predicated Neutrions even before they were detected, Thats Genius. They were so right that they got all the funds to build thoes expensive detectors.

 

MT,

So, solar neutrinos, neutrinos from observed supernova events, all detected. And neutrinos from neutron stars? See the response from CAGNAS. No one ever said a thing about neutrinos in conjuction with neutron stars. So, everything I've said so far has been correct and supported with evidence. How does this make me a "moron"?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Right. Everything's a conspiracy. Go back and get your highschool diploma and then apply to a decent college. Study some science and history. It'll do ya good. Trust me.

Your friend,
SL

 

Thats the difference between U and me, I can bypass all that garbage. Oh ya, and incase U didnt notice that ability gives me license of getting into any damn profession I want without prior proper education on it, its all a matter of incredible grasping powers, something that U humans currently havent evolved yet.

 

Anomalous, if you want people to talk to you intelligently, please stop pretending that you are superior to humans. Even if you geniunely are (which you are not), just humour us and pretend you are a mere human.

 

Thanks CH. I didn't realize that Anom was other than human.

 

YOU SAID IT.. MORON... DONT YOU REMEMBER..

READ BACK... THAT WAS MY POINT FROM THE BEGINNING.

you claimed we had evidense about neutron stars.. and you listed as supposive evidense... neutrinos... from.

you can take it back now.. its ok.

we all know why you say these things...

-MT

 

TO JOG YOUR MEMORY... which seems faulty.

-MT

 

MT,

Please post the quote from me that connects neutron stars with neutrino emissions. We were talking, I believe, about the evidence for fusion in main sequence stars...

 

Yes? You don't know what a main sequence star is, do you? Ha! Didn't think so.

BTW, thanks for supporting your own demise.

 

YES... and about fusion... it is based on the belief that all matter began as tiny protons and nuetrons...

and i pointed to nuetron stars.. and said.. wow.. look..

mass in a form... other than tiny protons.. and nuetrons...

gee.. i would think that is evidense.. evidense that matter is not limited to existance as tiny nucleons...

but.. as dwarfs and nuetron stars and pulsars show....

matter is not so limited...

and matter could of formed from these large bodies... breaking down... instead of building up as fusion supposes...

look..

natural law says... all matter naturally decays... breaks down...

matter does not naturally build up...

to do so... is reverse...

and while some people like to think it can go both ways....

the evidense... the evidense.. suggests.. no... IT DOESNT.

-MT