The Second Shooter Theory

Discussion in 'Conspiracies' started by FatFreddy, Oct 17, 2017.

  1. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    384
    I'm no expert but this guy makes sense to me.

    Forensic acoustic proof of SECOND shooter in the Las Vegas massacre



    A plausible scenario is that the government did it because they want more people to be pro-gun control. If martial law is ever declared, all of those guns in circulation will make it more difficult for them. Maybe they want to declare gun ownership illegal and collect as many guns as possible before they declare marshal law. The more pro-gun control people there are, the easier it will be for them to declare gun ownership illegal and collect guns.

    It's just a theory.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Gawdzilla Sama Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    561
    First off, the idea that a militia (aka "bunch of drunks with guns") could fight the US military is just stupid.

    Second, that theory was debunked back in the '60s. But do keep trying.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Michael 345 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,494
    Please no encouragement

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Gawdzilla Sama Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    561
    "...pour les encouragement des les autre."
     
  8. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    384
    But what do you think of the study of the acoustics that seem to show that there were two people shooting?
     
  9. Gawdzilla Sama Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    561
    You do know that the tape at least some of them were using for that was done several minutes after the shooting, right? I haven't heard of any "analysts" using others, but there might be a "new" one out there somewhere.
     
  10. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    384
    I'm a little confused here. When you say "Tape", are you referring to the footage in the YouTube videos?
     
  11. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,955
    That's what they should do.
     
  12. timojin Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,155
    I can see a gap in the analysis for second shooter. 1 ) the field of the shooting , means the area is wide spread so the first shot will be at distance "A" than the second shot can be at distance "B " in the field.
    So if the field is 200 ft by 200 ft the sound of the arrival of the bullet will be different and that might give an impression of a second shooter ?
     
  13. Gawdzilla Sama Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    561
    I am quite happy to completely ignore the University of Youtube.
     
    sideshowbob likes this.
  14. spidergoat Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    51,799
    It's a dumb one, because everyone knows by now that no amount of mass murders will change anything.
     
  15. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    384
    http://www.tomatobubble.com/id196.html
    (excerpt)
    -------------------------------
    "Don't believe everything you read on the Internet."
    RESPONSE:
    "I don't believe everything that's on the Internet. But apparently you believe everything that's on the Idiot Box! I only believe those things which are verifiable, and consistent with my own sense of reasoning and logic. The beauty of the Internet is that, unlike the TV that you worship so much, all sides of an issue are presented on the Internet. It allows a critical thinker to figure out what the true story is. The TV doesn't give you that option. Do you really believe that the media presents the whole story? Are you that naive? (laugh) Remember the fairy tale of the 'weapons of mass destruction' in Iraq? The media shoved that lie down our throats. So why do you trust the media so blindly and not the Internet?"
     
  16. Gawdzilla Sama Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    561
    Sorry, but I never watch the news on TV. And Youtube, AKA the Filbert Factory, is the arse end of the Internet.
     
  17. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    384
    YouTube has everything. You have to try to see which makes the most sense. If it hadn't been for YouTube, I wouldn't have seen the clear proof that 9/11 was an inside job?


    I wouldn't have known that the moon missions were faked.


    I wouldn't have heard these guys explaining American Imperialism.

    https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ken o'keefe
    https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=chris hedges



    YouTube is full of good stuff.
     
  18. Gawdzilla Sama Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    561
    Youtube is definitely full of it.
     
  19. Michael 345 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,494
    You missed out two letters sh

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  20. spidergoat Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    51,799
    There are not two legitimate sides to every issue.
     
  21. Michael 345 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,494
    Logical impossible since videos are still being added

    Some stuff is good. Much of it is something else

    Just for fun could you post a link to a video YOU consider to be fake?

    Nothing out of the conspiracy list. Just something which you personally consider to be made up but everyone else thinks it's real

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  22. Gawdzilla Sama Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    561
    And a whole bunch of illegitimate ones. That's why Youtube is popular with bastards.
     

Share This Page