nope, this is different, coming from a moderator, a supposedly good one.. but not as far as the participants and sci's administrator can tell. number of posts is as definitive as i can get, james didn't seem to mind it. so you didn't read this? you haven't yet given a viable reason to close it in the first place. still, now that GP has "agreed", it should reopened. :bugeye: it happens that i don't want to. i suggest you read the thread. mentioned; twice; i've written it in the proposal thread, then again in the debate thread you locked.. would you like me to PM it to you, Hercules? for the definitions, you can check up a dictionary. for the scope of debate, i believe i mentioned it here; which you didn't like; to which i replied; the answer to that is hidden somewhere in the page long post #10. English, um fonts and sizes i'm not too picky with. anything more complicated than that i see unnecessary. bothered reading the OP? ummm.....yes?! i rather not. i would too, actually, i DID. yes, i know what you think. which is why i didn't challenge you to this debate. I'm sorry, but no smiley on the internet shows a laughing fit worthy of your sentence. as it stands, YOU are a big waste of time, and for wasting my time in quoting half the thread for you, i'm reporting you.