The Religion subforum.

Discussion in 'SF Open Government' started by Jaster Mereel, Aug 4, 2006.

  1. Woody Musical Creationist Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,419
    Good suggestion.

    I never made that request. You need to take it up with the guy that started this thread, Jaster Mereel, but I do agree with him.
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. (Q) Encephaloid Martini Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,855
    I resemble that remark.

    In my humble defence though, I'd gladly lay off the riducule if the more ardent religious proponents would actually demonstrate their claims from time to time.

    And you conveniently left out the fact that those proponents also pour out their derision.

    Not at all, lest we live in glass houses.
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Absane Rocket Surgeon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,989
    Or that is what the man tells you.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Woody Musical Creationist Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,419
    Politically correct.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Science studies facts.

    Political Science just debates.
     
  8. Cris In search of Immortality Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,199
    Woody,

    Science will study anything in order to determine facts. It has no boundaries or limitations.

    Science starts with problems and seeks to find solutions.

    Religion starts by imagining a solution and then attempts to make everything fit that imaginary solution.
     
  9. Cris In search of Immortality Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,199
    Absane,

    The man says nothing.
     
  10. Theoryofrelativity Banned Banned

    Messages:
    5,595
    it was addressed to him..well all be it invisibly so
     
  11. leopold Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    17,455
    prove to me that things become alive.
    cite any scientific journal, paper or publication.
     
  12. Woody Musical Creationist Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,419
    Like it or not ALL philosophies (including science) begin within the human mind, and understanding comes through reasoning. Religion is also a philosophy. Nobody said you have to agree with all philosophies, but if you ignore the merits of philosophy, then you ignore the foundations of our culture and all other world cultures throughout history.

    Philosophy defined from the Wikipedia:

    There is no mention of science in the definition of philosophy. Hence science is a very limited pedagogy, if not totally inadequate for understanding other philosophies (which include religion). I know you and others want science to be the pedagogy, but I am sorry, it is not, and it never will be.

    In my humble opinion, It is illogical to assume science explains all philosophies, and quite absurd. Science is a product of philosophy. Assuming philosophy (the cause of science) is now subordinate to science violates the law of cause and effect -- from a philisophical view.

    The argument for the existence of God is a Cosmological argument, not a scientific one. Check out the link, and it will explain further.

    Alas, this is only a science forum, and if science is all there is to talk about, why should anyone limit themselves to such a small universe? I really like music and the arts a whole lot better. It feeds my emotional side. Yeah, my science degree feeds my family, but art makes life fun.
     
    Last edited: Aug 6, 2006
  13. Jaster Mereel Hostis Humani Generis Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    649
    In my defence, I have never begun a thread talking about religion from a religious context, so I am not proposing this idea because my own feathers have been ruffled as a result of derision on the part of atheists towards any idea that I have propounded.

    The truth is, from time to time I enjoy reading a religious individual's perspective on their own religion, and from time to time I want to try and understand their viewpoint on their beliefs. The reason why I proposed removing this subforum was that, often times, threads begun by religious people who want to debate a point of dogma with other religious people in the context of religion is deliberately attacked by those who have no religious leanings. It was this that caused me to start this thread, even though I doubted that the proposal would be seriously considered. I felt it was a debate that needed to be started.
     
  14. Tiassa Let us not launch the boat ... Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    37,884
    The problem is not that there is no science about religion, but that religious folks generally present difficult challenges to scientific discussion.
     
  15. Absane Rocket Surgeon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,989
    Silence says a lot.

    Anyway it was a joke

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  16. Huwy Secular Humanist Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    890
    i also vote that the religion sub-forum be scrapped.
    it seems to be a popular avenue for religious zealots to enter the forums for the sole purpose of preaching to other members and telling them that they are wrong, evolution is wrong, and they are doomed, unless they follow some absurd beliefs.

    also as soon as one religious zealot gives up its not long before another comes along, and many members feel compelled to debate these delusional beliefs and the damage they do to society - causing an endless cycle of arguments about the existence or non-existence of imaginary friends, or about the reality of evolution etc.

    i am ashamed to say that i have been drawn into these arguments far too many times.

    it is obvious that i feel very threatened by the fact that so many individuals are willing to pervert the world with their fear based delusions - but then again i believe that my feelings are justified, and its not surprising given the state of the world.

    i have no problem with many of the world's children believing in santa claus - children don't run the place (although sometimes I wonder), and children don't often kill other children en mass, or force them to submit to their bizarre delusions.

    am i insensitive or intolerant? perhaps. intolerant of the fact that even in the 21st century, people are mutilating their children's genitals, engaging in genocide, denying evolution in favour of teaching creationism, etc.

    tell me, what is the difference between a lebanese child and an israeli child?
    nothing, if you don't count the bullshit fed to them by their parents. the two peoples only consider themselves different primarily because of, you guessed it, religion.

    i mean really, call me an negative, pessimistic idealist, but how is the situation on this planet supposed to get any better if we silently allow others to spread such vicious lies? instead of worrying that we might be doomed in the afterlife, shouldn't we focus on WHY things are fucked right here right now?

    At the end of the day if ignorant people want to debate imaginary friends, or fight each other to the death, and there's nothing i can do about it, I say let them do it somewhere else.
     
  17. Woody Musical Creationist Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,419
    People that speak a foriegn language present a difficult challenge to any type of discussion. Someone must understand the other guy's language before a dialogue can even begin.
     
  18. Woody Musical Creationist Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,419
    There is no intelligent dialogue with someone that feels this way - honestly. You've already prejudged the matter, and this is called "prejudice." It is not wise.

    And the beliefs are not delusional. They are derived from the data (Bible, Koran) etc. The beliefs could be wrong, but they are not delusional.

    You can reject the data, and that's ok. But the data is here for anyone to evaluate. It's not imaginary.

    Alas, this is the mentality of sciforums. Many of greatest minds in science were spiritualists, and yet they are "crazy." I'm sorry, but there really is no venue for an intelligent discussion of religion on sciforums. I don't care what you do with the sub-forum. I'm not going there.

    I don't believe anybody wants any of this. Personally, I can think of much more productive things to do with my faith. I wonder why a person of non-faith would even be interested in a religion forum. Do they go to christian forums to debate? no, never. They come here to the religion forum where they can gang up with bullying tactics.
     
    Last edited: Aug 6, 2006
  19. Huwy Secular Humanist Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    890
    i went to a christian chat room and asked if someone could please explain the difference between "god" and "santa claus".

    i was banned for life immediately.
     
  20. (Q) Encephaloid Martini Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,855
    Is that your claim or mine?
     
  21. invert_nexus Ze do caixao Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,686
    Oh, come on.
    How could anyone even think of deleting the religion forum?

    For one thing, most of the religious posters stay down in religion. They have little to no interest in the rest of the forums. So, if you don't want to get into religious debate, then you can simply steer away from the afflicted subforums.
    Simple, yes?

    For two, a large segment of our scientific brethren pretty much devote their entire existence to talking religion. I don't really understand why. But they seem to get some kind of kick out of kicking theists around. So, let them have their jollies since talking about science just doesn't do it for them.
    Know what I mean?

    If the theists don't like being kicked around? Then they can go to some other board. Obviously, the religious posters who remain here after realizing what sort of treatment they get on this board like being kicked around. It's really not such an amazing concept, you know. Religion thrives in persecution. People like Q and Skinwalker will probably cause religion to persist for years beyond its natural lifespan.

    I can't really say much though, because there was a time that I used to like kicking around theists too. In forum and offline. I got bored with it though. Didn't seem to be much point really. But, to each their own.

    The religion subforum (or the holy melee) stays. And we should crucify any who state otherwise. Including Porfiry if he should sound off on that side of the issue... then he could rise from the grave and start a cult of his own....

    Heh.
    Reminds me of how I used to get rid of those religious guys that come around knocking on doors.
    "No thanks. I'm already in a cult."
     
  22. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    LOL
     
  23. Woody Musical Creationist Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,419
    You've already stated your position with such an analogy. There really is no common ground for a discussion.

    What forum was that? Not that I don't believe you. How could anyone take you seriously with an introduction like that? Why don't you just state your position like this: you don't believe God exists period, and leave out the childish overtones associated with santa claus?
     

Share This Page