The Religion of the Samurai, by Kaiten Nukariya

Discussion in 'General Philosophy' started by Adam, Jan 21, 2003.

  1. Adam §Þ@ç€ MØnk€¥ Registered Senior Member





    Professor of Kei-O-Gi-Jiku University and of So-To-Shu Buddhist
    College, Tokyo




    (1) The Southern and Northern Schools of Buddhism
    (2) The Development and Differentiation of Buddhism
    (3) The Object of this Book is the Explaining of the Mahayanistic
    View of Life and the World
    (4) Zen holds a Unique Position among the Established Religions of
    the World
    (5) The Historical Antiquity of Zen
    (6) The Denial of Scriptural Authority by Zen
    (7) The Practisers of Zen hold the Buddha as their Predecessor, whose
    Spiritual Level they Aim to Attain
    (8) The Iconoclastic Attitude of Zen
    (9) Zen Activity
    (10) The Physical and Mental Training
    (11) The Historical Importance



    1. The Origin of Zen in India
    2. The Introduction of Zen into China by Bodhidharma
    3. Bodhidharma and the Emperor Wu
    4. Bodhidharma and his Successor, the Second Patriarch
    5. Bodhidharma's Disciples and the Transmission of the Law
    6. The Second and the Third Patriarchs
    7. The Fourth Patriarch and the Emperor Tai Tsung
    8. The Fifth and the Sixth Patriarchs
    9. The Spiritual Attainment of the Sixth Patriarch
    10. The Flight of the Sixth Patriarch
    11. The Development of the Southern and the Northern School of Zen
    12. The Missionary Activity of the Sixth Patriarch
    13. The Disciples under the Sixth Patriarch
    14. Three Important Elements of Zen
    15. Decline of Zen



    1. The Establishment of the Rin Zai School of Zen in Japan
    2. The Introduction of the So To School of Zen
    3. The Characteristics of Do-gen, the Founder of the Japanese So To
    4. The Social State of Japan when Zen was Established by Ei-sai and
    5. The Resemblance of the Zen Monk to the Samurai
    6. The Honest Poverty of the Zen Monk and the Samurai
    7. The Manliness of the Zen Monk and the Samurai
    8. The Courage and Composure of Mind of the Zen Monk and the Samurai
    9. Zen and the Regent Generals of the Ho-jo Period
    10. Zen after the Downfall of the Ho-jo Regency
    11. Zen in the Dark Age
    12. Zen under the Toku-gawa Shogunate
    13. Zen after the Restoration



    1. Scripture is no More than Waste Paper
    2. No Need of the Scriptural Authority for Zen
    3. The Usual Explanation of the Canon
    4. Sutras used by the Zen Masters
    5. A Sutra Equal in Size to the Whole World 68
    6. Great Men and Nature
    7. The Absolute and Reality are but an Abstraction
    8. The Sermon of the Inanimate



    1. The Ancient Buddhist Pantheon
    2. Zen is Iconoclastic
    3. Buddha is Unnamable
    4. Buddha, the Universal Life
    5. Life and Change
    6. The Pessimistic View of Ancient Hindus
    7. Hinayanism and its Doctrine
    8. Change as seen by Zen
    9. Life and Change
    10. Life, Change, and Hope
    11. Everything is Living according to Zen
    12. The Creative Force of Nature and Humanity
    13. Universal Life is Universal Spirit
    14. Poetical Intuition and Zen
    15. Enlightened Consciousness
    16. Buddha Dwelling in the Individual Mind
    Enlightened Consciousness is not an Intellectual Insight
    18. Our Conception of Buddha is not Final
    19. How to Worship Buddha



    1. Man is Good-natured according to Mencius
    2. Man is Bad-natured according to Siun Tsz
    3. Man is both Good-natured and Bad-natured according to Yan Hiung
    4. Man is neither Good-natured nor Bad-natured according to Su Shih
    5. There is no Mortal who is Purely Moral
    6. There is no Mortal who is Non-moral or Purely Immoral
    7. Where, then, does the Error Lie?
    8, Man is not Good-natured nor Bad-natured, but Buddha natured
    9. The Parable of the Robber Kih
    10. Wang Yang Ming and a Thief
    11. The Bad are the Good in the Egg
    12. The Great Person and the Small Person
    13. The Theory of Buddha-Nature adequately explains the Ethical
    States of Man
    14. Buddha-Nature is the Common Source of Morals
    15. The Parable of a Drunkard
    16. Shakya Muni and the Prodigal Son
    17. The Parable of the Monk and the Stupid Woman
    18. 'Each Smile a Hymn, each Kindly Word a Prayer'

    19. The World is in the Making
    20. The Progress and Hope of Life
    21. The Betterment of Life
    22. The Buddha of Mercy



    1. Enlightenment is beyond Description and Analysis
    2. Enlightenment Implies an Insight into the Nature of Self
    3. The Irrationality of the Belief of Immortality
    4. The Examination of the Notion of Self
    5. Nature is the Mother of All Things
    6. Real Self
    7. The Awakening of the Innermost Wisdom
    8. Zen is not Nihilistic
    9. Zen and Idealism
    10. Idealism is a Potent Medicine for Self -Created Mental Disease
    11. Idealistic Scepticism concerning Objective Reality
    12. Idealistic Scepticism concerning Religion and Morality
    13. An Illusion concerning Appearance and Reality
    14. Where does the Root of the Illusion Lie?
    15. Thing-in-Itself means Thing-Knowerless
    16. The Four Alternatives and the Five Categories
    17. Personalism of B. P. Bowne
    18. All the Worlds in Ten Directions are Buddha's Holy Land



    1. Epicureanism and Life
    2. The Errors of Philosophical Pessimists and Religious Optimists
    3. The Law of Balance
    4. Life Consists in Conflict
    5. The Mystery of Life
    6. Nature favours Nothing in Particular
    7. The Law of Balance in Life
    8. The Application of the Law of Causation to Morals
    9. The Retribution in the Past, the Present, and the Future Life
    10. The Eternal Life as taught by Professor M?nsterberg
    11. Life in the Concrete
    12. Difficulties are no Match for an Optimist
    13. Do Thy Best and Leave the Rest to Providence



    1. The Method of Instruction adopted by Zen Masters
    2. The First Step in the Mental Training
    3. The Next Step in the Mental Training
    4. The Third Step in the Mental Training
    5. Zazen, or the Sitting in Meditation
    6. The Breathing Exercise of the Yogi
    7. Calmness of Mind
    8. Zazen and the Forgetting of Self
    9. Zen and Supernatural Power
    10. True Dhyana
    11. Let Go of Your Idle Thoughts
    12. 'The Five Ranks of Merit'
    13. 'The Ten Pictures of the Cowherd'
    14. Zen and Nirvana
    15. Nature and Her Lesson
    16. The Beatitude of Zen









    1. The Doctrine for Men and Devas
    2. The Doctrine of the Hinayanists
    3. The Mahayana Doctrine of Dharmalaksana
    4. Mahayana Doctrine of the Nihilists



    5. The Ekayana Doctrine that Teaches the Ultimate Reality




    Buddhism is geographically divided into two schools[FN#1]--the
    Southern, the older and simpler, and the Northern, the later and more
    developed faith. The former, based mainly on the Pali texts[FN#2] is
    known as Hinayana[FN#3] (small vehicle), or the inferior doctrine;
    while the latter, based on the various Sanskrit texts,[4] is known as
    Mahayana (large vehicle), or superior doctrine. The chief tenets of
    the Southern School are so well known to occidental scholars that
    they almost always mean the Southern School by the word Buddhism.
    But with regard to the Northern School very little is known to the
    West, owing to the fact that most of its original texts were lost,
    and that the teachings based on these texts are written in Chinese,
    or Tibetan, or Japanese languages unfamiliar to non-Buddhist

    [FN#1] The Southern School has its adherents in Ceylon, Burma, Siam,
    Anan, etc.; while the Northern School is found in Nepal, China,
    Japan, Tibet, etc.

    [FN#2] They chiefly consist of the Four Nikayas: (1) Digha Nikaya
    (Dirghagamas, translated into Chinese by Buddhaya?as, A.D. 412-413);
    (2) Majjhima Nikaya (Madhyamagamas, translated into Chinese by
    Gautama Sanghadeva, A.D. 397-398); (3) Sanyutta Nikaya
    (Samyuktagamas, translated into Chinese by Gunabhadra, of the earlier
    Sung dynasty, A.D. 420 479); (4) Anguttara Nikaya (Ekottaragamas,
    translated into Chinese by Dharmanandi, A.D. 384-385). Out of these
    Hinayana books, the English translation of twenty-three suttas by
    Rhys Davids exist in 'Sacred Books of Buddhist,' vols. ii.-iii., and
    of seven suttas by the same author in 'Sacred Books of the East,'
    vol. xi.

    [FN#3] The Southern Buddhists never call their faith Hinayana, the
    name being an invention of later Buddhists, who call their doctrine
    Mahayana in contradistinction to the earlier form of Buddhism. We
    have to notice that the word Hinayana frequently occurs in Mahayana
    books, while it does not in Hinayana books.

    [FN#4] A catalogue of the Buddhist Canon, K'-yuen-luh, gives the
    titles of 897 Mahayana sutras, yet the most important books often
    quoted by Northern Buddhist teachers amount to little more than
    twenty. There exist the English translation of Larger
    Sukhavati-vyuha-sutra, Smaller Sukhavati-vyuha-sutra,
    Vajracchedika-sutra, Larger Prajna-paramita-hradya-sutra, Smaller
    Prajna-paramita-hrdaya-sutra, by Max M?ller, and
    Amitayur-dhyana-sutra, by J. Takakusu, in 'Sacred Books of the East,'
    vol. xlix. An English translation of Saddharma-pundarika-sutra, by
    Kern, is given in 'Sacred Books of the East,' Vol. xxi. Compare
    these books with 'Outlines of Mahayana Buddhism,' by D. Suzuki.

    It is hardly justifiable to cover the whole system of Buddhism with a
    single epithet[FN#5] 'pessimistic' or 'nihilistic,' because Buddhism,
    having been adopted by savage tribes as well as civilized nations, by
    quiet, enervated people as well as by warlike, sturdy hordes, during
    some twenty-five hundred years, has developed itself into beliefs
    widely divergent and even diametrically opposed. Even in Japan alone
    it has differentiated itself into thirteen main sects and forty-four
    sub-sects[FN#6] and is still in full vigour, though in other
    countries it has already passed its prime. Thus Japan seems to be
    the best representative of the Buddhist countries where the majority
    of people abides by the guiding principle of the Northern School. To
    study her religion, therefore, is to penetrate into Mahayanism, which
    still lies an unexplored land for the Western minds. And to
    investigate her faith is not to dig out the remains of Buddhist faith
    that existed twenty centuries ago, but to touch the heart and soul of
    Mahayanism that enlivens its devotees at the present moment.

    [FN#5] Hinayanism is, generally speaking, inclined to be
    pessimistic, but Mahayanism in the main holds the optimistic view of
    life. Nihilism is advocated in some Mahayana sutras, but others set
    forth idealism or realism.

    [FN#6] (1) The Ten Dai Sect, including three sub-sects; (2) The Shin
    Gon Sect, including eleven sub-sects; (3) The Ritsu Sect; (4) The Rin
    Zai Sect, including fourteen sub-sects; (5) The So To Sect; (6) The O
    Baku Sect; (7) The Jo Do Sect, including two sub-sects; (8) The Shin
    Sect, including ten sub-sects; (9) The Nichi Ren Sect, including nine
    sub-sects; (10) The Yu Zu Nen Butsu Sect; (11) The Hosso Sect; (12)
    The Ke Gon Sect; (13) The Ji Sect. Out of these thirteen Buddhist
    sects, Rin Zai, So To, and O Baku belong to Zen. For further
    information, see 'A Short History of the Twelve Japanese Buddhist
    Sects,' by Dr. B. Nanjo.

    The object of this little book is to show how the Mahayanistic view
    of life and of the world differs markedly from that of Hinayanism,
    which is generally taken as Buddhism by occidentals, to explain how
    the religion of Buddha has adapted itself to its environment in the
    Far East, and also to throw light on the existing state of the
    spiritual life of modern Japan.

    For this purpose we have singled out of thirteen Japanese sects the
    Zen Sect, [FN#7] not only because of the great influence it has
    exercised on the nation, but because of the unique position it holds
    among the established religious systems of the world. In the first
    place, it is as old as Buddhism itself, or even older, for its mode
    of practising Meditation has been handed down without much alteration
    from pre-Buddhistic recluses of India; and it may, on that account,
    provide the student of comparative religion with an interesting
    subject for his research.

    [FN#7] The word Zen is the Sinico-Japanese abbreviation of the
    Sanskrit Dhyana, or Meditation. It implies the whole body of
    teachings and discipline peculiar to a Buddhist sect now popularly
    known as the Zen Sect.

    In the second place, in spite of its historical antiquity, ideas
    entertained by its advocates are so new that they are in harmony with
    those of the New Buddhists;[FN#8] accordingly the statement of these
    ideas may serve as an explanation of the present movement conducted
    by young and able reformers of Japanese Buddhism.

    [FN#8] There exists a society formed by men who have broken with the
    old creeds of Buddhism, and who call themselves the New Buddhists.
    It has for its organ 'The New Buddhism,' and is one of the
    influential religious societies in Japan. We mean by the New
    Buddhists, however, numerous educated young men who still adhere to
    Buddhist sects, and are carrying out a reformation.

    Thirdly, Buddhist denominations, like non-Buddhist religions, lay
    stress on scriptural authority; but Zen denounces it on the ground
    that words or characters can never adequately express religious
    truth, which can only be realized by mind; consequently it claims
    that the religious truth attained by Shakya Muni in his Enlightenment
    has been handed down neither by word of mouth nor by the letters of
    scriptures, but from teacher's mind to disciple's through the line of
    transmission until the present day. It is an isolated instance in
    the whole history of the world's religions that holy scriptures are
    declared to be 'no more than waste[FN#9] paper by religionists, as
    done by Zen masters.

    [FN#9] Lin Tsi Luh (Rin-zai-roku).

    Fourthly, Buddhist as well as non-Buddhist religions regard, without
    exception, their founders as superhuman beings, but the practisers of
    Zen hold the Buddha as their predecessor, whose spiritual level they
    confidently aim to attain. Furthermore, they liken one who remains
    in the exalted position of Buddhaship to a man bound by a gold chain,
    and pity his state of bondage. Some of them went even so far as to
    declare Buddhas and Bodhisattvas to be their servants and
    slaves.[FN#10] Such an attitude of religionists can hardly be found
    in any other religion.

    [FN#10] "Shakya and Maitreya," says Go So, "are servants to the
    other person. Who is that other person?" (Zen-rin-rui-ju, Vol. i.,
    p. 28).

    Fifthly, although non-Buddhist people are used to call Buddhism
    idolatry, yet Zen can never be called so in the accepted sense of the
    term, because it, having a grand conception of Deity, is far from
    being a form of idol-worship; nay, it sometimes even took an
    iconoclastic attitude as is exemplified by Tan Hia, [FN#11] who
    warmed himself on a cold morning by making a fire of wooden statues.
    Therefore our exposition on this point will show the real state of
    existing Buddhism, and serve to remove religious prejudices
    entertained against it.

    [FN#11] A Chinese Zen teacher, well known for his peculiarities, who
    died in A.D. 824. For the details of this anecdote, see
    Zen-rin-rui-ju, Vol. i., P. 39.

    Sixthly, there is another characteristic of Zen, which cannot be
    found in any other religion-that is to say, its peculiar mode of
    expressing profound religious insight by such actions as the lifting
    up of a hair-brush, or by the tapping of the chair with a staff, or
    by a loud outcry, and so forth. This will give the student of
    religion a striking illustration of differentiated forms of religion
    in its scale of evolution.

    Besides these characteristics, Zen is noted for its physical and
    mental training. That the daily practice of Zazen[FN#12] and the
    breathing exercise remarkably improves one's physical condition is an
    established fact. And history proves that most Zen masters enjoyed a
    long life in spite of their extremely simple mode of living. Its
    mental discipline, however, is by far more fruitful, and keeps one's
    mind in equipoise, making one neither passionate nor dispassionate,
    neither sentimental nor unintelligent, neither nervous nor senseless.
    It is well known as a cure to all sorts of mental disease,
    occasioned by nervous disturbance, as a nourishment to the fatigued
    brain, and also as a stimulus to torpor and sloth. It is
    self-control, as it is the subduing of such pernicious passions as
    anger, jealousy, hatred, and the like, and the awakening of noble
    emotions such as sympathy, mercy, generosity, and what not. It is a
    mode of Enlightenment, as it is the dispelling of illusion and of
    doubt, and at the same time it is the overcoming of egoism, the
    destroying of mean desires, the uplifting of the moral ideal, and the
    disclosing of inborn wisdom.

    [FN#12] The sitting-in-meditation, for the full explanation of which
    see Chapter VIII.

    The historical importance of Zen can hardly be exaggerated. After
    its introduction into China in the sixth century, A.D., it grew
    ascendant through the Sui (598-617) and the Tang dynasty (618-906),
    and enjoyed greater popularity than any other sect of Buddhism during
    the whole period of the Sung (976-1126) and the Southern Sung dynasty
    (1127-1367). In these times its commanding influence became so
    irresistible that Confucianism, assimilating the Buddhist teachings,
    especially those of Zen, into itself and changing its entire aspect,
    brought forth the so-called Speculative philosophy.[FN#13] And in
    the Ming dynasty (1368-1659) the principal doctrines of Zen were
    adopted by a celebrated Confucian scholar, Wang Yang Ming,[FN#14] who
    thereby founded a school, through which Zen exercised profound
    influence on Chinese and Japanese men of letters, statesmen, and

    As regards Japan, it was first introduced into the island as the
    faith first for the Samurai or the military class, and moulded the
    characters of many distinguished soldiers whose lives adorn the pages
    of her history. Afterwards it gradually found its way to palaces as
    well as to cottages through literature and art, and at last permeated
    through every fibre of the national life. It is Zen that modern
    Japan, especially after the Russo-Japanese War, has acknowledged as
    an ideal doctrine for her rising generation.

    [FN#13] See 'A History of Chinese Philosophy,' by Ryukichi Endo, and
    A History of Chinese Philosophy,' by Giichi Nakauchi.

    [FN#14] For the life of this distinguished scholar and soldier
    (1472-1529), see 'A Detailed Life of O Yo Mei’ by Takejiro Takase, and
    also 'O-yo-mei-shutsu-shin-sei-ran-roku.'



    1. Origin of Zen in India.

    To-day Zen as a living faith can be found in its pure form only among
    the Japanese Buddhists. You cannot find it in the so-called Gospel
    of Buddha anymore than you can find Unitarianism in the Pentateuch,
    nor can you find it in China and India any more than you can find
    life in fossils of bygone ages. It is beyond all doubt that it can
    be traced back to Shakya Muni himself, nay, even to pre-Buddhistic
    times, because Brahmanic teachers practised Dhyana, or
    Meditation,[FN#15] from earliest times.

    [FN#15] "If a wise man hold his body with its three parts (chest,
    neck, and head) erect, and turn his senses with the mind towards the
    heart, he will then in the boat of Brahman cross all the torrents
    which cause fear.

    "Compressing his breathings let him, who has subdued all motions,
    breathe forth through the nose with the gentle breath. Let the wise
    man without fail restrain his mind, that chariot yoked with vicious

    "Let him perform his exercises in a place level, pure, free from
    pebbles, fire, and dust, delightful by its sounds, its water, and
    bowers; not painful to the eye, and full of shelters and eaves.

    "When Yoga, is being performed, the forms which come first, producing
    apparitions in Brahman, are those of misty smoke, sun, fire, wind,
    fire-flies, lightnings, and a crystal moon.

    "When, as earth, water, light, heat, and ether arises, the fivefold
    quality of Yoga takes place, then there is no longer illness, old
    age, or pain for him who has obtained a body produced by the fire of

    The first results of Yoga they call lightness, healthiness,
    steadiness, a good complexion, an easy pronunciation, a sweet odour,
    and slight excretions "(Cvet. Upanisad, ii. 8-13).

    "When the five instruments of knowledge stand still together with the
    mind, and when the intellect does not move, that is called the
    highest state.

    "This, the firm holding back of the senses, is what is called Yoga.
    He must be free from thoughtlessness then, for Yoga comes and goes"
    (Katha Upanisad, ii. 10, 11).

    "This is the rule for achieving it (viz., concentration of the mind
    on the object of meditation): restraint of the breath, restraint of
    the senses, meditation, fixed attention, investigation,
    absorption-these are called the sixfold Yoga. When beholding by this
    Yoga, be beholds the gold-coloured maker, the lord, the person,
    Brahman, the cause; then the sage, leaving behind good and evil,
    makes everything (breath, organs of sense, body, etc.) to be one in
    the Highest Indestructible (in the pratyagatman or Brahman) " (Maitr.
    Upanisad, vi. 18).

    "And thus it has been elsewhere: There is the superior fixed
    attention (dharana) for him-viz., if he presses the tip of the tongue
    down the palate, and restrain the voice, mind, and breath, he sees
    Brahman by discrimination (taraka). And when, after the cessation of
    mind, he sees his own Self, smaller than small, and shining as the
    Highest Self, then, having seen his Self as the Self, he becomes
    Self-less, and because he is Self-less, he is without limit, without
    cause, absorbed in thought. This is the highest mystery--viz., final
    liberation " (Maitr. Upanisad, vi. 20).

    Amrtab. Upanisad, 18, describes three modes of sitting-namely, the
    Lotus-seat (Padmasana), the sitting with legs bent underneath; the
    mystic diagram seat (Svastika); and the auspicious-seat
    (Bhadrasana);--while Yogacikha directs the choice of the
    Lotus-posture, with attention concentrated on the tip of the nose,
    hands and feet closely joined.

    But Brahmanic Zen was carefully distinguished even by early
    Buddhists[FN#16] as the heterodox Zen from that taught by the Buddha.
    Our Zen originated in the Enlightenment of Shakya Muni, which took
    place in his thirtieth year, when he was sitting absorbed in profound
    meditation under the Bodhi Tree.

    [FN#16] The anonymous author of Lankavatara-sutra distinguishes the
    heterodox Zen from the Hinayana Zen, the Hinayana Zen from the
    Mahayana Zen, and calls the last by the name of the Buddha's Holy
    Zen. The sutra is believed by many Buddhists, not without reason, to
    be the exposition of that Mahayana doctrine which Acvaghosa restated
    in his Craddhotpada-castra. The sutra was translated, first, into
    Chinese by Gunabbadra, in A.D. 443; secondly, by Bodhiruci in A.D.
    513; and, thirdly, by Ciksanada in A.D. 700-704. The book is famous
    for its prophecy about Nagdrajuna, which (according to Dr. Nanjo's
    translation) is as follows:

    "After the Nirvana of the Tathagata,
    There will be a man in the future,
    Listen to me carefully, O Mahatma,
    A man who will hold my law.
    In the great country of South,
    There will be a venerable Bhiksu
    The Bodhisattva Nagarjuna by name,
    Who will destroy the views of Astikas and Nastikas,
    Who will preach unto men my Yana,
    The highest Law of the Mahayana,
    And will attain to the Pramudita-bhumi."

    It is said that then he awoke to the perfect truth and declared: "All
    animated and inanimate beings are Enlightened at the same time."
    According to the tradition[FN#17] of this sect Shakya Muni
    transmitted his mysterious doctrine from mind to mind to his oldest
    disciple Mahakacyapa at the assembly hold on the Mount of Holy
    Vulture, and the latter was acknowledged as the first patriarch, who,
    in turn, transmitted the doctrine to Ananda, the second patriarch,
    and so till Bodhidharma, the twenty-eighth[FN#18] patriarch. We have
    little to say about the historical value of this tradition, but it is
    worth while to note that the list of the names of these twenty-eight
    patriarchs contains many eminent scholars of Mahayanism, or the later
    developed school of Buddhism, such as Acvaghosa,[FN#19]
    Nagarjuna,[FN#20] Kanadeva,[FN#21] and Vasubhandhu.[FN#22]

    [FN#17] The incident is related as follows: When the Buddha was at
    the assembly on the Mount of Holy Vulture, there came a Brahmaraja
    who offered the Teacher a golden flower, and asked him to preach the
    Dharma. The Buddha took the flower and held it aloft in his hand,
    gazing at it in perfect silence. None in the assembly could
    understand what he meant, except the venerable Mahakacyapa, who
    smiled at the Teacher. Then the Buddha said: "I have the Eye and
    Treasury of Good Dharma, Nirvana, the Wonderful Spirit, which I now
    hand over to Mahakacyapa." The book in which this incident is
    described is entitled 'Sutra on the Great Brahman King's Questioning
    Buddha to Dispel a Doubt,' but there exists no original text nor any
    Chinese translation in the Tripitaka. It is highly probable that
    some early Chinese Zen scholar of the Sung dynasty (A.D. 960-1126)
    fabricated the tradition, because Wang Ngan Shih (O-an-seki), a
    powerful Minister under the Emperor Shan Tsung (Shin-so, A.D.
    1068-1085), is said to have seen the book in the Imperial Library.
    There is, however, no evidence, as far as we know, pointing to the
    existence of the Sutra in China. In Japan there exists, in a form of
    manuscript, two different translations of that book, kept in secret
    veneration by some Zen masters, which have been proved to be
    fictitious by the present writer after his close examination of the
    contents. See the Appendix to his Zen-gaku-hi-han-ron.

    [FN#18] The following is the list of the names of the twenty-eight

    1. Mahakacyapa.
    2. Ananda.
    3. Canavasu.
    4. Upagupta.
    5. Dhrtaka.
    6. Micchaka.
    7. Vasumitra.
    8. Buddhanandi.
    9. Buddhamitra.
    10. Parcva.
    11. Punyayacas.
    12. Acvaghosa.
    13. Kapimala.
    14. Nagarjuna.
    15. Kanadeva.
    16. Rahulata.
    17. Samghanandi.
    18. Samghayacas.
    19. Kumarata.
    20. Jayata.
    21. Vasubandhu.
    22. Manura.
    23. Haklanayacas.
    24. Simha.
    25. Vacasuta.
    26. Punyamitra.
    27. Prajnyatara.
    28. Bodhidharma.

    The first twenty-three patriarchs are exactly the same as those given
    in 'The Sutra on the Nidana of transmitting Dharmapitaka,' translated
    in A.D. 472. King Teh Chwen Tang Iuh (Kei-toku-den-to-roku), a
    famous Zen history of China, gives two elaborate narratives about the
    transmission of Right Dharma from teacher to disciple through these
    twenty-eight patriarchs, to be trusted without hesitation. It would
    not be difficult for any scholar of sense to find these statements
    were made from the same motive as that of the anonymous author who
    gives a short life, in Dirghagama-sutra, of each of the six Buddhas,
    the predecessors of Shakya Muni, if he carefully compare the list
    given above with the lists of the patriarchs of the Sarvastivada
    school given by San Yin (So-yu died A.D. 518) in his Chuh San Tsung
    Ki (Shutsu-san zo-ki).

    [FN#19] One of the founders of Mahayana Buddhism, who flourished in
    the first century A.D. There exists a life of his translated into
    Chinese by Kumarajiva in A.D. 401-409. The most important of his
    works are: Mahayanacraddhotpada-castra, Mahalankara-sutra-castra,

    [FN#20] The founder of the Madhyamika school of Mahayana Buddhism,
    who lived in the second century A.D. A life of his was translated
    into Chinese by Kumarajiva in A.D. 401-409. Twenty-four books are
    ascribed to him, of which Mahaprajñaparamita-castra, Madhyamika-castra,
    Prajnyadipa-castra, Dvadacanikaya-castra, Astadacakaca-castra, are
    well known.

    [FN#21] Sometimes called Aryadeva, a successor of Nagarjuna. A life
    of his was translated into Chinese by Kumarajiva in A.D. 401-409.
    The following are his important works: Cata-castra, 'Castra by the
    Bodhisattva Deva on the refutation of four heretical Hinayana schools
    mentioned in the Lankatvatara-sutra'; 'Castra by the Bodhisattva Deva
    on the explanation of the Nirvana by twenty Hinayana teachers
    mentioned in the Lankavatara-sutra.'

    [FN#22] A younger brother of Asamga, a famous Mahayanist of the
    fifth century A.D. There are thirty-six works ascribed to
    Vasubandhu, of which Dacabhumika-castra, Aparimitayus-sutra-castra,
    Mahapari-nirvana-sutra-castra, Mahayana-catadharmavidyadvara-castra,
    Vidya-matrasiddhi-tridaca-castra, Bodhicittopadana-castra,
    Buddha-gotra-castra, Vidyamatrasiddhivincatigatha-castra,
    Madhyantavibhaga-castra, Abhidharma-koca-castra, Tarka-castra, etc.,
    are well known.

    2. Introduction of Zen into China by Bodhidharma.

    An epoch-making event took place in the Buddhist history of China by
    Bodhidharma's coming over from Southern India to that country in
    about A.D. 520.[FN#23] It was the introduction, not of the dead
    scriptures, as was repeatedly done before him, but of a living faith,
    not of any theoretical doctrine, but of practical Enlightenment, not
    of the relies of Buddha, but of the Spirit of Shakya Muni; so that
    Bodhidharma's position as a representative of Zen was unique. He
    was, however, not a missionary to be favourably received by the
    public. He seems to have behaved in a way quite opposite to that in
    which a modern pastor treats his flock. We imagine him to have been
    a religious teacher entirely different in every point from a popular
    Christian missionary of our age. The latter would smile or try to
    smile at every face he happens to see and would talk sociably; while
    the former would not smile at any face, but would stare at it with
    the large glaring eyes that penetrated to the innermost soul. The
    latter would keep himself scrupulously clean, shaving, combing,
    brushing, polishing, oiling, perfuming, while the former would be
    entirely indifferent to his apparel, being always clad in a faded
    yellow robe. The latter would compose his sermon with a great care,
    making use of rhetorical art, and speak with force and elegance;
    while the former would sit as absolutely silent as the bear, and kick
    one off, if one should approach him with idle questions.

    [FN#23] Buddhist historians differ in opinion respecting the date of
    Bodhidharma's appearance in China. Compare Chwen Fah Chan Tsung Lun
    (Den bo sho ju ron) and Hwui Yuen (E-gen).

    3. Bodhidharma and the Emperor Wu.

    No sooner had Bodhidharma landed at Kwang Cheu in Southern China than
    he was invited by the Emperor[FN#24] Wu, who was an enthusiastic
    Buddhist and good scholar, to proceed to his capital of Chin Liang.
    When he was received in audience, His Majesty asked him: "We have
    built temples, copied holy scriptures, ordered monks and nuns to be
    converted. Is there any merit, Reverend Sir, in our conduct?" The
    royal host, in all probability, expected a smooth, flattering answer
    from the lips of his new guest, extolling his virtues, and promising
    him heavenly rewards, but the Blue-eyed Brahmin bluntly answered: "No
    merit at all."
    This unexpected reply must have put the Emperor to shame and doubt in
    no small degree, who was informed simply of the doctrines of the
    orthodox Buddhist sects. 'Why not,' he might have thought within
    himself, 'why all this is futile? By what authority does he declare
    all this meritless? What holy text can be quoted to justify his
    assertion? What is his view in reference to the different doctrines
    taught by Shakya Muni? What does he hold as the first principle of
    Buddhism?' Thus thinking, he inquired: "What is the holy truth, or
    the first principle?" The answer was no less astonishing: "That
    principle transcends all. There is nothing holy."

    [FN#24] The Emperor Wu (Bu-Tei) of the Liang dynasty, whose reign
    was A.D. 502-549.]

    The crowned creature was completely at a loss to see what the teacher
    meant. Perhaps he might have thought: 'Why is nothing holy? Are
    there not holy men, Holy Truths, Holy Paths stated in the scriptures?
    Is he himself not one of the holy men?' "Then who is that confronts
    us?" asked the monarch again. "I know not, your majesty," was the
    laconic reply of Bodhidharma, who now saw that his new faith was
    beyond the understanding of the Emperor.

    The elephant can hardly keep company with rabbits. The petty
    orthodoxy can by no means keep pace with the elephantine stride of
    Zen. No wonder that Bodhidharma left not only the palace of the
    Emperor Wu, but also the State of Liang, and went to the State of
    Northern Wei.[FN#25] There he spent nine years in the Shao
    Lin[FN#26] Monastery, mostly sitting silent in meditation with his
    face to the wall, and earned for himself the appellation of 'the
    wall-gazing Brahmin.' This name itself suggests that the
    significance of his mission was not appreciated by his
    contemporaries. But neither he was nor they were to blame, because
    the lion's importance is appreciated only by the lion. A great
    personage is no less great because of his unpopularity among his
    fellow men, just as the great Pang[FN#27] is no less great because of
    his unpopularity among the winged creatures. Bodhidharma was not
    popular to the degree that he was envied by his contemporary
    Buddhists, who, as we are told by his biographers, attempted to
    poison him three times,[FN#28] but without success.

    [FN#25] Northern Gi dynasty (A.D. 386-534).

    [FN#26] Sho-rin-ji, erected by the Emperor Hiao Ming of Northern Wei
    A.D. 497.

    [FN#27] Chwang-tsz in his famous parable compares a great sage with
    the Pang, an imaginary bird of enormous size, with its wings of
    ninety thousand miles. The bird is laughed at by wrens and sparrows
    because of its excessive size.

    [FN#28] This reminds us of Nan Yoh Hwui Sz (Nan-gaku-e-shi, died
    A.D. 577), who is said to have learned Zen under Bodhidharma. He says
    in his statement of a vow that he was poisoned three times by those
    who envied him.

    4. Bodhidharma and his Successor the Second Patriarch.

    China was not, however, an uncultivated[FN#29] land for the seed of
    Zen--nay, there had been many practisers of Zen before Bodhidharma.

    [FN#29] The translation of Hinayana Zen sutras first paved the way
    for our faith. Fourteen Zen sutras, including such important books
    as Mahanapanadhyana-sutra, Dhyanacarya-dharmasanyjnya-sutra,
    Dhyanacarya-saptatrimcadvarga-sutra, were translated by Ngan Shi Kao
    (An-sei-ko) as early as A.D. 148-170. Cullamargabhumi-sutra was
    translated by K' Yao (Shi-yo) in A.D. 185; Dharmatara-dhyana-sutra by
    Buddhabhadra in A.D. 398-421;
    Dhyananisthitasamadhi-dharma-parygya-sutra by Kumarajiva in A.D. 402;
    'An Abridged Law on the Importance of Meditation' by Kumarajiva in
    A.D. 405; Pancadvara-dhyanasutra-maharthadharma by Dharmamitra in
    A.D. 424-441. Furthermore, Mahayana books closely related to the
    doctrine of Zen were not unknown to China before Bodhidharma.
    Pratyutpanna-buddhasammukhavasthita-samadhi was translated by K' Leu
    Cia Chan (Shi-ru-ga-sen) in A.D. 164-186; Vimalakirttinirdeca-sutra,
    which is much used in Zen, by Kumarajiva in A.D. 384-412;
    Lankavatara-sutra, which is said to have been pointed out by
    Bodhidharma as the best explanation of Zen, by Gunabhadra in A.D.
    433; Saddharma-pundarika-sutra, in its complete form, by Kumarajiva
    in A.D. 406; Avatamsaka-sutra by Buddhabhadra in A.D. 418;
    Mahaparinirvana-sutra by Dharmaraksa in A.D. 423.

    If we are not mistaken, Kumarajiva, who came to China A.D. 384, made
    a valuable contribution towards the foundation of Zen in that
    country, not merely through his translation of Zen sutras above
    mentioned, but by the education of his disciples, such as Sang Chao
    (So-jo, died A.D. 414), Sang Shang (So-sho, whose writings
    undoubtedly influenced later Zen teachers. A more important
    personage in the history of Zen previous to the Blue-eyed Brahmin is
    Buddhabhadra, a well-known Zen master, who came over to China A.D.
    406. His translation of Dharmatara-dhyana-sutra (which is said to
    have been preached by Bodhidharma himself when he was in India) and
    that of Avatamsaka-sutra may be said without exaggeration to have
    laid the corner-stone for Zen. He gave a course of lectures on the
    Zen sutra for the first time in China in A.D. 413, and it was through
    his instruction that many native practisers of Zen were produced, of
    whom Chi Yen (Chi-gon) and Huen Kao (Gen-ko) are well known. In
    these days Zen should have been in the ascendant in India, because
    almost all Indian scholars-at least those known to us-were called Zen
    teachers-for instance, Buddhabhadra, Buddhasena, Dharmadhi, and some
    others were all Zen scholars.

    Chinese Buddhist scholars did no less than Indian teachers toward the
    uprising of Zen. The foremost among them is Hwui Yuen (E-on, died
    A.D. 414), who practised Zen by the instruction of Buddhabhadra. He
    founded the Society of the White Lotus, which comprised eighteen
    eminent scholars of the age among its members, for the purpose of
    practising Meditation and of adoring Buddha Amitabha. We must not
    forget that during the Western and the Eastern Tsin (Shin) dynasties
    (A.D. 265-420) both Taoism and Buddhism grew prosperous to no small
    extent. And China produced, on the one hand, Taoists of an eccentric
    type, such as the Seven Wise Men of the Bamboo Forest, while she gave
    birth to many recluse-like men of letters, such as Tao Yuen Ming
    (To-yen-mei, died A.D. 427) and some others on the other. Besides
    there were some scholars who studied Buddhism in connection with
    Taoism and Confucianism, and led a secluded life. To the last class
    of scholars belonged Chwen Hih (Hu dai shi), known as Chwen the
    Great. He is said to have been accustomed to wear a Confucianist
    hat, a Buddhist robe, and Taoist shoes. It was in A.D. 534 that he
    presented a memorial to the Emperor Wu, in which he explained the
    three grades of good. "The Highest Good consists," says he, "in the
    emptiness of mind and non-attachment. Transcendence is its cause,
    and Nirvana is its result. The Middle Good consists in morality and
    good administration. It results in a peaceful and happy life in
    Heaven and in Earth. The Lowest Good consists in love and protection
    of sentient beings." Thus his idea of good, as the reader will see
    without difficulty, is the result of a compromise of Taoism and
    Buddhism. Sin Wang Ming (Sin-o-mei, On the Mind-King), one of his
    masterpieces, together with other minor poems, are still used as a
    textbook of Zen. This fact unmistakably proves that Taoist element
    found its way into the constituents of Zen from its very outset in

    All that he had to do was to wait for an earnest seeker after the
    spirit of Shakya Muni. Therefore he waited, and waited not in vain,
    for at last there came a learned Confucianist, Shang Kwang (Shin-ko)
    by name, for the purpose of finding the final solution of a problem
    which troubled him so much that he had become dissatisfied with
    Confucianism, as it had no proper diet for his now spiritual hunger.
    Thus Shang Kwang was far from being one of those half-hearted
    visitors who knocked the door of Bodhidharma only for the sake of
    curiosity. But the silent master was cautious enough to try the
    sincerity of a new visitor before admitting him to the Meditation
    Hall. According to a biography[FN#30] of his, Shang Kwang was not
    allowed to enter the temple, and had to stand in the courtyard
    covered deep with snow. His firm resolution and earnest desire,
    however, kept him standing continually on one spot for seven days and
    nights with beads of the frozen drops of tears on his breast. At
    last he cut off his left arm with a sharp knife, and presented it
    before the inflexible teacher to show his resolution to follow the
    master even at the risk of his life. Thereupon Bodhidharma admitted
    him into the order as a disciple fully qualified to be instructed in
    the highest doctrine of Mahayanism.

    [FN#30] King Teh Chwen Tang Luh (Kei-toku-den-to-roku), published by
    Tao Yuen (Do-gen) A.D. 1004, gives a detailed narrative concerning
    this incident as stated here, but earlier historians tell us a
    different story about the mutilation of Shang Kwang's arm. Compare
    Suh Kas San Chwen (Zoku-ko-so-den) and Hwui Yuen (E-gen).

    Our master's method of instruction was entirely different from that
    of ordinary instructors of learning. He would not explain any
    problem to the learner, but simply help him to get enlightened by
    putting him an abrupt but telling question. Shang Kwang, for
    instance, said to Bodhidharma, perhaps with a sigh: "I have no peace
    of mind. Might I ask you, sir, to pacify my mind?" "Bring out your
    mind (that troubles you so much)," replied the master, "here before
    me! I shall pacify it." "It is impossible for me," said the
    disciple, after a little consideration, "to seek out my mind (that
    troubles me so much)." "Then," exclaimed Bodhidharma, "I have
    pacified your mind." Hereon Shang Kwang was instantly Enlightened.
    This event is worthy of our notice, because such a mode of
    instruction was adopted by all Zen teachers after the first
    patriarch, and it became one of the characteristics of Zen.

    5. Bodhidharma's Disciples and the Transmission of the Law.[FN#31]

    [FN#31] For details, see Chwen Tang Luh and Den Ka Roku, by Kei Zan.
    As for the life of Bodhidharma, Dr. B. Matsumoto's 'A Life of
    Bodhidharma' may well be recommended to the reader.

    Bodhidharma's labour of nine years in China resulted in the
    initiation of a number of disciples, whom some time before his death
    he addressed as follows: "Now the time (of my departure from this
    world) is at hand. Say, one and all, how do you understand the Law?"
    Tao Fu (Do-fuku) said in response to this: "The Law does not lie in
    the letters (of the Scriptures), according to my view, nor is it
    separated from them, but it works." The Master said: "Then you have
    obtained my skin." Next Tsung Chi (So-ji), a nun, replied: "As
    Ananda[FN#32] saw the kingdom of Aksobhya[FN#33] only once but not
    twice, so I understand the Law". The master said: "Then you have
    attained to my flesh." Then Tao Yuh (Do-iku) replied: "The four
    elements[FN#34] are unreal from the first, nor are the five
    aggregates[FN#35] really existent. All is emptiness according to my
    view." The master said: "Then you have acquired my bone." Lastly,
    Hwui Ko (E-ka), which was the Buddhist name given by Bodhidharma, to
    Shang Kwang, made a polite bow to the teacher and stood in his place
    without a word. "You have attained to my marrow." So saying,
    Bodhidharma handed over the sacred Kachaya, [FN#36] which he had
    brought from India to Hwui Ko, as a symbol of the transmission of the
    Law, and created him the Second Patriarch.

    [FN#32] A favourite disciple of Shakya Muni, and the Third Patriarch
    of Zen.

    [FN#33] The: name means I Immovable,' and represents the firmness of

    [FN#34] Earth, water, fire, and air.

    [FN#35] (1) Rupa, or form; (2) Vedana, or perception; (3) Samjnya,
    or consciousness; (4) Karman (or Samskara), or action; (5) Vijnyana,
    or knowledge.

    [FN#36] The clerical cloak, which is said to have been dark green.
    It became an object of great veneration after the Sixth Patriarch,
    who abolished the patriarchal system and did not hand the symbol over
    to successors.

    6. The Second and the Third Patriarchs.

    After the death of the First Patriarch, in A.D. 528, Hwui Ko did his
    best to propagate the new faith over sixty years. On one occasion a
    man suffering from some chronic disease called on him, and requested
    him in earnest: "Pray, Reverend Sir, be my confessor and grant me
    absolution, for I suffer long from an incurable disease." "Bring out
    your sin (if there be such a thing as sin)," replied the Second
    Patriarch, "here before me. I shall grant you absolution." "It is
    impossible," said the man after a short consideration, "to seek out
    my sin." "Then," exclaimed the master, "I have absolved you.
    Henceforth live up to Buddha, Dharma, and Samgha."[FN#37] "I know,
    your reverence," said the man, "that you belong to Samgha; but what
    are Buddha and Dharma?" "Buddha is Mind itself. Mind itself is
    Dharma. Buddha is identical with Dharma. So is Samgha." "Then I
    understand," replied the man, "there is no such thing as sin within
    my body nor without it, nor anywhere else. Mind is beyond and above
    sin. It is no other than Buddha and Dharma." Thereupon the Second
    Patriarch saw the man was well qualified to be taught in the new
    faith, and converted him, giving him the name of Sang Tsung (So-san).
    After two years' instruction and discipline, he[FN#38] bestowed on
    Sang Tsung the Kachaya handed down from Bodhidharma, and authorized
    him as the Third Patriarch. It is by Sang Tsung that the doctrine of
    Zen was first reduced to writing by his composition of Sin Sin[FN#39]
    Ming (Sin zin-mei, On Faith and Mind), a metrical exposition of the

    [FN#37] The so-called Three Treasures of the Buddha, the Law, and
    the Order.

    [FN#38] The Second Patriarch died in A.D. 593--that is, sixty-five
    years after the departure of the First Patriarch.

    [FN#39] A good many commentaries were written on the book, and it is
    considered as one of the best books on Zen.

    7. The Fourth Patriarch and the Emperor Tai Tsung (Tai-so).

    The Third[FN#40] Patriarch was succeeded by Tao Sin (Do-shin), who
    being initiated at the age of fourteen, was created the Fourth
    Patriarch after nine years' study and discipline. Tao Sin is said
    never to have gone to bed for more than forty years of his
    patriarchal career.[FN#41] In A.D. 643 the Emperor Tai Tsung
    (627-649), knowing of his virtues, sent him a special messenger,
    requesting him to call on His Majesty at the palace. But he declined
    the invitation by a memorial, saying that be was too aged and infirm
    to visit the august personage. The Emperor, desirous of seeing the
    reputed patriarch, sent for him thrice, but in vain. Then the
    enraged monarch ordered the messenger to behead the inflexible monk,
    and bring the head before the throne, in case he should disobey the
    order for the fourth time. As Tao Sin was told of the order of the
    Emperor, he stretched out his neck ready to be decapitated. The
    Emperor, learning from the messenger what had happened, admired all
    the more the imperturbable patriarch, and bestowed rich gifts upon
    him. This example of his was followed by later Zen masters, who
    would not condescend to bend their knees before temporal power, and
    it became one of the characteristics of Zen monks that they would
    never approach rulers and statesmen for the sake of worldly fame and
    profit, which they set at naught.

    [FN#40] He died in A.D. 606, after his labour of thirteen years as
    the teacher.

    [FN#41] He died in A.D. 651-that is, forty-five years after the
    death of the Third Patriarch.

    8. The Fifth and the Sixth Patriarchs.

    Tao Sin transmitted the Law to Hung Jan (Ko-nin), who being educated
    from infancy, distinguished himself as the Abbot of the Hwang Mei
    Monastery at Ki Cheu. The Fifth Patriarch, according to his
    biographer, gathered about him seven hundred pupils, who came from
    all quarters. Of these seven hundred pupils the venerable Shang Sin
    (Jin-shu) was most noted for his learning and virtues, and he might
    have become the legitimate successor of Hung Jan, had not the Kachaya
    of Bodhidharma been carried away by a poor farmer's son of Sin Cheu.
    Hwui Nang, the Sixth Patriarch, seems to have been born a Zen
    teacher. The spiritual light of Buddha first flashed in his mind
    when he happened to hear a monk reciting a sutra. On questioning the
    monk, be learned that the book was
    Vajracchedika-prajnya-paramita-sutra,[FN#42] and that Hung Jan, the
    Abbot of the Hwang Mei Monastery, was used to make his disciples
    recite the book that it might help them in their spiritual
    discipline. Hereupon he made up his mind to practise Zen, and called
    on Hung Jan at the Monastery. "Who are you," demanded the Fifth
    Patriarch, "and whence have you come?" "I am a son of the farmer,"
    replied the man, "of Sin Cheu in the South of Ta Yu Ling." "What has
    brought you here?" asked the master again. "I have no other purpose
    than to attain to Buddhahood," answered the man. "O, you, people of
    the South," exclaimed the patriarch, "you are not endowed with the
    nature of Buddha." "There may be some difference between the
    Southern and the Northern people," objected the man, "but how could
    you distinguish one from the other as to the nature of Buddha?" The
    teacher recognized a genius in the man, but he did not admit the
    promising newcomer into the order, so Hwui Nang had to stay in the
    Monastery for eight months as a pounder of rice in order to qualify
    himself to be a Zen teacher.

    [FN#42] The book was translated into Chinese by Kumarajiva in A.D.
    384. 417; also by Bodhiruci in A.D. 509, and by Paramartha in A.D.
    592; then by Hiuen Tsang in A.D. 648. Many commentaries have been
    written on it by the prominent Buddhist authors of China and Japan.

    9. The Spiritual Attainment of the Sixth Patriarch.

    Some time before his death (in 675 A.D.) the Fifth Patriarch
    announced to all disciples that the Spirit of Shakya Muni is hard to
    realize, that they should express their own views on it, on condition
    that anyone who could prove his right realization should be given
    with the Kachaya and created the Sixth Patriarch. Then the venerable
    Sung Siu, the head of the seven hundred disciples, who was considered
    by his brothers to be the man entitled to the honour, composed the
    following verses:

    "The body is the Bodhi-tree.[FN#43]
    The mind is like a mirror bright on its stand.
    Dust it and wipe it from time to time,
    Lest it be dimmed by dust and dirt."

    [FN#43] The idea expressed by these lines is clear enough. Body is
    likened to the Bodhi-tree, under which Shakya Muni attained to his
    supreme enlightenment; for it is not in another body in the future
    existence, but in this very body that one had to get enlightened.
    And mind is pure and bright in its nature like a mirror, but the dirt
    and dust of passions and of low desires often pollute and dim it.
    Therefore one should dust and wipe it from time to time in order to
    keep it bright.

    All who read these lines thought that the writer was worthy of the
    expected reward, and the Fifth Patriarch also, appreciating the
    significance of the verses, said: "If men in the future would
    practise Zen according to this view, they would acquire an excellent
    result." Hwui Nang, the rice-pounder, hearing of them, however,
    secretly remarked that they are beautiful, but hardly expressive of
    the Spirit of Shakya Muni, and wrote his own verses, which ran as

    "There is no Bodhi-tree,[FN#44]
    Nor is there a mirror stand.
    Nothing exists from the first
    What can be dimmed by dust and dirt?"

    [FN#44] These verses have often been misunderstood as expressive of
    a nihilistic view, but the real meaning is anything but nihilistic.
    Mind is pure and bright in its essence. It is always free from
    passions and mean desires, just as the sun is always bright, despite
    of cloud and mist that cover its face. Therefore one must get an
    insight into this essential nature of Mind, and realize that one has
    no mean desires and passions from the first, and also that there is
    no tree of Bodhi nor the mirror of Enlightenment without him, but
    they are within him.

    Perhaps nobody ever dreamed such an insignificant fellow as the
    rice-pounder could surpass the venerable scholar in a religious
    insight, but the Fifth Patriarch saw at once an Enlightened Soul
    expressed in those lines; therefore he made up his mind to give the
    Kachaya to the writer, in whom he found a great spiritual leader of
    future generations. But he did it secretly at midnight, lest some of
    the disciples from envy do violence to Hwui Nang. He was, moreover,
    cautious enough to advise his successor to leave the Monastery at
    once, and go back to the South, that the latter might conceal his
    Enlightenment until a time would come for his missionary activities.

    10. Flight of the Sixth Patriarch.

    On the following morning the news of what had happened during the
    night flew from mouth to mouth, and some of the enraged brothers
    attempted to pursue the worthy fugitive. The foremost among them,
    Hwui Ming (E-myo), overtook the Sixth Patriarch at a mountain pass
    not very far from the Monastery. Then Hwui Nang, laying down the
    Kachaya on a rock by the road, addressed the pursuer: "This is a mere
    symbol of the patriarchal authority, and it is not a thing to be
    obtained by force. Take it along with you, if you long for it."
    Upon this Hwui Ming, who began to be ashamed of his base act, tried
    to lift the Kachaya, but in vain, for it was, as he felt, as heavy as
    the rock itself. At last he said to the Sixth Patriarch: "I have
    come here, my brother, not for the sake of this robe, but for the
    sake of the Law. Grant my hearty desire of getting Enlightened."
    "If you have come for the Law," replied Hwui Nang, "you must put an
    end to all your struggles and longings. Think neither of good nor of
    evil (make your mind pure from all idle thoughts), then see how is,
    Hwui Ming, your original (mental) physiognomy!" Being thus
    questioned, Ming found in an instant the Divine Light of Buddha
    within himself, and became a disciple of the Sixth Patriarch.

    11. The Development of the Southern and of the Northern School of Zen.

    After the death of the Fifth Patriarch the venerable Shang Siu,
    though not the legitimate successor of his master, was not inactive
    in the propagation of the faith, and gathered about him a number of
    enthusiastic admirers. This led to the foundation of the Northern
    school of Zen in opposition to the Southern school led by the Sixth
    Patriarch. The Empress Tseh Tien Wa Heu,[FN#45] the real ruler of
    China at that time, was an admirer of Shang Siu, and patronized his
    school, which nevertheless made no further development.

    [FN#45] The Emperor Chung Tsung (Chu-so, A.D. 684-704) was a nominal
    sovereign, and the Empress was the real ruler from A.D. 684 to 705.

    In the meanwhile the Sixth Patriarch, who had gone to the South,
    arrived at the Fah Sing Monastery in Kwang Cheu, where Yin Tsung
    (In-shu), the abbot, was giving lectures on the Mahayana sutras to a
    number of student monks. It was towards evening that he happened to
    overhear two monks of the Monastery discussing about the flag
    floating in air. One of them said: "It is the wind that moves in
    reality, but not the flag." "No," objected the other, "it is the
    flag that moves in reality, but not the wind." Thus each of them
    insisted on his own one-sided view, and came to no proper conclusion.
    Then the Sixth Patriarch introduced himself and said to them: "It is
    neither the wind nor the flag, but your mind that moves in reality."
    Yin Tsung, having heard these words of the stranger, was greatly
    astonished, and thought the latter should have been an extraordinary
    personage. And when he found the man to be the Sixth Patriarch of
    Zen, he and all his disciples decided to follow Zen under the master.
    Consequently Hwui Nang, still clad like a layman, changed his
    clothes, and began his patriarchal career at that Monastery. This is
    the starting-point of the great development of Zen in China.

    12. Missionary Activity of the Sixth Patriarch.

    As we have seen above, the Sixth Patriarch was a great genius, and
    may be justly called a born Zen teacher. He was a man of no
    erudition, being a poor farmer, who had served under the Fifth
    Patriarch as a rice-pounder only for eight months, but he could find
    a new meaning in Buddhist terms, and show how to apply it to
    practical life. On one occasion, for instance, Fah Tah (Ho-tatsu), a
    monk who had read over the Saddharma-pundarika-sutra[FN#46] three
    thousand times, visited him to be instructed in Zen. "Even if you
    read the sutra ten thousand times," said the Sixth Patriarch, who
    could never read the text, "it will do you no good, if you cannot
    grasp the spirit of the sutra." "I have simply recited the book,"
    confessed the monk, "as it is written in characters. How could such
    a dull fellow as I grasp its spirit?" "Then recite it once,"
    responded the master; "I shall explain its spirit." Hereupon Fah Tah
    began to recite the sutra, and when he read it until the end of the
    second chapter the teacher stopped him, saying: "You may stop there.
    Now I know that this sutra was preached to show the so-called
    greatest object of Shakya Muni's appearing on earth. That greatest
    object was to have all sentient beings Enlightened just as He
    Himself." In this way the Sixth Patriarch grasped the essentials of
    the Mahayana sutras, and freely made use of them as the explanation
    of the practical questions about Zen.

    [FN#46] One of the most noted Mahayana sutras, translated by
    Dharmaraksa (A.D. 286) and by Kumarajiva (A.D. 406). The reader has
    to note that the author states the essential doctrine in the second
    chapter. See " Sacred Books of the East," vol. xxi., pp. 30-59.

    13. The Disciples under the Sixth Patriarch.

    Some time after this the Sixth Patriarch settled himself down at the
    Pao Lin Monastery, better known as Tsao Ki Shan (So-kei-zan), in Shao
    Cheu, and it grow into a great centre of Zen in the Southern States.
    Under his instruction many eminent Zen masters qualified themselves
    as Leaders of the Three Worlds. He did not give the patriarchal
    symbol, the Kachaya, to his successors, lest it might cause needless
    quarrels among the brethren, as was experienced by himself. He only
    gave sanction to his disciples who attained to Enlightenment, and
    allowed them to teach Zen in a manner best suited to their own
    personalities. For instance, Huen Kioh (Gen-kaku), a scholar of the
    Tien Tai doctrine,[FN#47] well known as the Teacher of Yung
    Kia[FN#48] (Yo-ka), received a sanction for his spiritual attainment
    after exchanging a few words with the master in their first
    interview, and was at once acknowledged as a Zen teacher. When he
    reached the zenith of his fame, he was presented with a crystal bowl
    together with rich gifts by the Empress Tseh Tien; and it was in A.D.
    705 that the Emperor Chung Tsung invited him in vain to proceed to
    the palace, since the latter followed the example of the Fourth

    [FN#47] The Teacher of Tien Tai (Ten-dai, A.D. 538-597), the founder
    of the Buddhist sect of the same name, was a great scholar of
    originality. His doctrine and criticism on the Tripitaka greatly
    influenced the whole of Buddhism after him. His doctrine is briefly
    given in the second chapter.

    [FN#48] His Ching Tao Ko (Sho-do-ka), a beautiful metrical
    exposition of Zen, is still read by most students of Zen.

    After the death[FN#49] of the Sixth Patriarch (A.D. 713), the
    Southern Zen was divided into two schools, one being represented by
    Tsing Yuen (Sei-gen), the other by Nan Yoh (Nan-gaku.) Out of these
    two main schools soon developed the five[FN#50] branches of Zen, and
    the faith made a splendid progress. After Tsing Yuen and Nan Yoh,
    one of the junior disciples of the Sixth Patriarch, Hwui Chung
    (E-chu), held an honourable position for sixteen years as the
    spiritual adviser to the Emperor Suh Tsung (A.D. 756762) and to the
    Emperor Tai Tsung (A.D. 763-779). These two Emperors were
    enthusiastic admirers of Zen, and ordered several times the Kachaya
    of Bodhidharma to be brought into the palace from the Pao Lin
    Monastery that they might do proper homage to it. Within some one
    hundred and thirty years after the Sixth Patriarch, Zen gained so
    great influence among higher classes that at the time of the Emperor
    Suen Tsung (A.D. 847-859) both the Emperor and his Prime Minister,
    Pei Hiu, were noted for the practice of Zen. It may be said that Zen
    had its golden age, beginning with the reign of the Emperor Suh
    Tsung, of the Tang dynasty, until the reign of the Emperor Hiao Tsung
    (1163-1189), who was the greatest patron of Buddhism in the Southern
    Sung dynasty. To this age belong almost all the greatest Zen
    scholars[FN#51] of China.

    [FN#49] There exists Luh Tan Fah Pao Tan King
    (Roku-so-ho-bo-dan-kyo), a collection of his sermons. It is full of
    bold statements of Zen in its purest form, and is entirely free from
    ambiguous and enigmatical words that encumber later Zen books. In
    consequence it is widely read by non-Buddhist scholars in China and
    Japan. Both Hwui Chung (E-chu), a famous disciple of the Sixth
    Patriarch, and Do-gen, the founder of the Soto Sect in Japan, deny
    the authority of the book, and declare it to be misleading, because
    of errors and prejudices of the compilers. Still, we believe it to
    be a collection of genuine sections given by the Sixth Patriarch,
    though there are some mistakes in its historical narratives.

    [FN#50] (1) The Tsao Tung (So-to) Sect, founded by Tsing Yuen (died
    in A.D. 740) and his successors; (2) the Lin Tsi (Rin-Zai) Sect,
    founded by Nan Yoh (died in 744) and his successors; (3) the Wei Yan
    (Yi-gyo) Sect, founded by Wei Shan (Yi-san, died in 853) and his
    disciple Yen Shan (Kyo-zan, died in 890); (4) the Yun Man (Un-mon)
    Sect, founded by Yun Man (died in 949); (5) the Pao Yen (Ho-gen)
    Sect, founded by Pao Yen (died in 958).

    [FN#51] During the Tang dynasty (A.D. 618-906) China produced,
    besides the Sixth Patriarch and his prominent disciples, such great
    Zen teachers as Ma Tsu (Ba-so, died in 788), who is probably the
    originator of the Zen Activity; Shih Teu (Seki-to, died in 790), the
    reputed author of Tsan Tung Ki (San-do-kai), a metrical writing on
    Zen; Poh Chang (Hyaku-jo, died 814), who first laid down regulations
    for the Zen Monastery; Wei Shan (Yi-san), Yang Shan (Kyo-zan), the
    founders of the Wei Yang Sect; Hwang Pah (O-baku, died in 850), one
    of the founders of the Lin Tsi Sect, and the author of Chwen Sin Pao
    Yao, (Den-sin-ho-yo), one of the best works on Zen; Lin Tsi (Rin-zai,
    died in 866), the real founder of the Lin Tsi Sect; Tung Shan
    (To-zan, died in 869), the real founder of the Tsao Tung Sect; Tsao
    Shan (So-zan, died in 901), a famous disciple of Tung Shan; Teh Shan
    (Toku-san, died in 865), who was used to strike every questioner with
    his staff; Chang Sha (Cho-sha, died in 823); Chao Cheu (Jo-shu, died
    in 897); Nan Tsuen (Nan-sen, died in 834); Wu Yeh (Mu-go, died in
    823); who is said to have replied, 'Away with your idle thoughts,' to
    every questioner; Yun Yen (Un-gan, died in 829); Yoh Shan (Yaku-san,
    died in 834); Ta Mei (Tai-bai, died in 839), a noted recluse; Ta Tsz
    (Dai-ji, died in 862); Kwei Fung (Kei-ho, died in 841), the author of
    'The Origin of Man,' and other numerous works; and Yun Ku (Un-go,
    died in 902).

    To the period of the Five Dynasties (A.D. 907-959) belong such
    teachers as Sueh Fung (Set-po, died in. 908); Huen Sha (Gen-sha, died
    in 908); Yun Man (Un-mon, died in 949), the founder of the Yun Man
    Sect; Shen Yueh (Zen-getsu, died in 912), a renowned Zen poet; Pu Tai
    (Ho-tei, died in 916), well known for his peculiarities; Chang King
    (Cho-kei, died in 932); Nan Yuen (Nan-in, died in 952); Pao Yen
    (Ho-gen, died in 958), the founder of the Pao Yen Sect. During the
    Sung dynasty (A.D. 960-1126) appeared such teachers as Yang Ki
    (Yo-gi, died in 1049), the founder of the Yang Ki School of Zen; Sueh
    Teu (Set-cho, died in 1052), noted for poetical works; Hwang Lung (O
    ryu, died in 1069), the founder of the Hwang Lung School of Zen;
    Hwang Lin (Ko-rin, died in 987); Tsz Ming (Ji-myo, died in 1040); Teu
    Tsy (To-shi, died in 1083); Fu Yun (Fu-yo, died in 1118); Wu Tsu
    (Go-so, died in 1104); Yung Ming (Yo-myo, died in 975), the author of
    Tsung King Luh (Shu-kyo-roku); Ki Sung (Kai-su, died in 1071), a
    great Zen historian and author. In the Southern Sung dynasty (A.D.
    1127-1279) flourished such masters as Yuen Wu (En-go, died in 1135),
    the author of Pik Yen Tsih (Heki-gan-shu); Chan Hieh (Shin-ketsu,
    flourished in 1151); Hung Chi (Wan-shi, died in 1157), famous for his
    poetical works; Ta Hwui (Dai-e, died in 1163), a noted disciple of
    Yuen Wu; Wan Sung (Ban-sho), flourished in 1193-1197), the author of
    Tsung Yun Luh (Sho-yo-roku); Ju Tsing (Nyo-jo), died in 1228), the
    teacher to Do-gen, or the founder of the So-to Sect in Japan.

    To this age belong almost all the eminent men of letters,[FN#52]
    statesmen, warriors, and artists who were known as the practisers of
    Zen. To this age belongs the production of almost all Zen
    books,[FN#53] doctrinal and historical.

    [FN#52] Among the great names of Zen believers the following are
    most important: Pang Yun (Ho-on, flourished in 785-804), whose whole
    family was proficient in Zen; Tsui Kiun (Sai-gun, flourished in
    806-824); Luh Kang (Rik-ko), a lay disciple to Nan Tsun; Poh Loh Tien
    (Haku-raku-ten, died in 847), one of the greatest Chinese literary
    men; Pei Hiu (Hai-kyu, flourished 827-856), the Prime Minister under
    the Emperor Suen Tsung, a lay disciple to Hwang Pah; Li Ngao (Ri-ko,
    lived about 806), an author and scholar who practised Zen under Yoh
    Shan; Yu Chuh (U-teki, flourished 785-804), a local governor, a
    friend of Pang Yun; Yang Yih (Yo-oku, flourished in 976), one of the
    greatest writers of his age; Fan Chung Ngan (Han-chu an, flourished
    1008-1052), an able statesman and scholar; Fu Pih (Fu shitsu,
    flourished 1041-1083), a minister under the Emperor Jan Tsung; Chang
    Shang Ying (Cho-sho-yei, 1086-1122), a Buddhist scholar and a
    statesman; Hwang Ting Kien (Ko-tei-ken, 1064-1094), a great poet; Su
    Shih (So-shoku, died in 1101), a great man of letters, well known as
    So-to-ba; Su Cheh (So-tetsu, died in 1112), a younger brother of
    So-to-ba, a scholar and minister under the Emperor Cheh Tsung; Chang
    Kiu Ching (Cho-Kyu-sei, flourished about 1131), a scholar and lay
    disciple of Ta Hwui; Yang Kieh (Yo-ketsu, flourished 1078-1086), a
    scholar and statesman.

    [FN#53] Of doctrinal Zen books, besides Sin Sin Ming by the Third
    Patriarch, and Fah Pao Tan King by the Sixth Patriarch, the following
    are of great importance:

    (1) Ching Tao Ko (Sho-do-ka), by Huen Kioh (Gen-kaku).
    (2) Tsan Tung Ki (San-do-kai), by Shih Ten (Seki-to).
    (3) Pao King San Mei (Ho-kyo-san-mai), by Tung Shan (To-zan).
    (4) Chwen Sin Pao Yao (Den-sin-ho-yo), by Hwang Pah (O-baku).
    (5) Pih Yen Tsih (Heki-gan-shu), by Yuen Wu (En-go).
    (6) Lin Tsi Luh (Rin-zai-roku), by Lin Tsi (Rin-zai).
    (7) Tsung Yun Luh (Sho-yo-roku), by Wan Sung (Ban-sho).

    Of historical Zen books the following are of importance:

    (1) King teh Chwen Tan-Luh (Kei-toku-den-to-roku), published in 1004
    by Tao Yuen (Do-gen).
    (2) Kwan Tang Luh (Ko-to roku), published in 1036 by Li Tsun Suh
    (3) Suh Tang Luh (Zoku-O-roku), published in 1101 by Wei Poh (I-haku).
    (4) Lien Tang Luh (Ren-O-roku), published in 1183 by Hwui Wang
    (5) Ching Tsung Ki (Sho-ju-ki), published in 1058 by Ki Sung
    (6) Pu Tang Luh (Fu-O-roku), published in 1201 by Ching Sheu (Sho-ju).
    (7) Hwui Yuen (E-gen), published in 1252 by Ta Chwen (Dai-sen).
    (8) Sin Tang Luh (Sin-W-roku), published in 1280-1294 by Sui (Zui).
    (9) Suh Chwen Tang Luh (Zoku-den-to-roku), by Wang Siu (Bun-shu).
    (10) Hwui Yuen Suh Lioh (E-gen-zoku-ryaku), by Tsing Chu (Jo-chu).
    (11) Ki Tang Luh (Kei-to-roku), by Yung Kioh (Yo-kaku).

    14. Three Important Elements of Zen.

    To understand how Zen developed during some four hundred years after
    the Sixth Patriarch, we should know that there are three important
    elements in Zen. The first of these is technically called the Zen
    Number--the method of practising Meditation by sitting cross-legged,
    of which we shall treat later.[FN#54] This method is fully developed
    by Indian teachers before Bodhidharma's introduction of Zen into
    China, therefore it underwent little change during this period. The
    second is the Zen Doctrine, which mainly consists of Idealistic and
    Pantheistic ideas of Mahayana Buddhism, but which undoubtedly
    embraces some tenets of Taoism. Therefore, Zen is not a pure Indian
    faith, but rather of Chinese origin. The third is the Zen Activity,
    or the mode of expression of Zen in action, which is entirely absent
    in any other faith.

    [FN#54] See Chapter VII.

    It was for the sake of this Zen Activity that Hwang Pah gave a slap
    three times to the Emperor Suen Tsung; that Lin Tsi so often burst
    out into a loud outcry of Hoh (Katsu); that Nan Tsuen killed a cat at
    a single stroke of his knife in the presence of his disciples; and
    that Teh Shan so frequently struck questioners with his staff.[FN#55]
    The Zen Activity was displayed by the Chinese teachers making use of
    diverse things such as the staff, the brush[FN#56] of long hair, the
    mirror, the rosary, the cup, the pitcher, the flag, the moon, the
    sickle, the plough, the bow and arrow, the ball, the bell, the drum,
    the cat, the dog, the duck, the earthworm--in short, any and
    everything that was fit for the occasion and convenient for the
    purpose. Thus Zen Activity was of pure Chinese origin, and it was
    developed after the Sixth Patriarch.[FN#57] For this reason the
    period previous to the Sixth Patriarch may be called the Age of the
    Zen Doctrine, while that posterior to the same master, the Age of the
    Zen Activity.

    [FN#55] A long official staff (Shu-jo) like the crosier carried by
    the abbot of the monastery.

    [FN#56] An ornamental brush (Hos-su) often carried by Zen teachers.

    [FN#57] The giving of a slap was first tried by the Sixth Patriarch,
    who struck one of his disciples, known as Ho Tseh (Ka-taku), and it
    was very frequently resorted to by the later masters. The lifting up
    of the brush was first tried by Tsing Yuen in an interview with his
    eldest disciple, Shih Ten, and it became a fashion among other
    teachers. The loud outcry of Hoh was first made use of by Ma Tsu,
    the successor of Nan Yoh. In this way the origin of the Zen Activity
    can easily be traced to the Sixth Patriarch and his direct disciples.
    After the Sung dynasty Chinese Zen masters seem to have given undue
    weight to the Activity, and neglected the serious study of the
    doctrine. This brought out the degeneration severely reproached by
    some of the Japanese Zen teachers.

    15. Decline of Zen.

    The blooming prosperity of Zen was over towards the end of the
    Southern Sung dynasty (1127-1279), when it began to fade, not being
    bitten by the frost of oppression from without, but being weakened by
    rottenness within. As early as the Sung dynasty (960-1126) the
    worship of Buddha Amitabha[FN#58] stealthily found its way among Zen
    believers, who could not fully realize the Spirit of Shakya Muni, and
    to satisfy these people the amalgamation of the two faiths was
    attempted by some Zen masters.[FN#59]

    [FN#58] The faith is based on Larger Sukhavati-vyuha, Smaller
    Sukhavati-vyuha, and Amitayus-dhyana-sutra. It was taught in India
    by Acvaghosa, Nagariuna, and Vasubandhu. In China Hwui Yuen (E-on,
    died in A.D. 416), Tan Lwan (Don-ran, died in 542), Tao Choh
    (Do-shaku), and Shen Tao (Zen-do) (both of whom lived about 600-650),
    chiefly taught the doctrine. It made an extraordinary progress in
    Japan, and differentiated itself into several sects, of which Jodo
    Shu and Shin Shu are the strongest.

    [FN#59] It is beyond all doubt that Poh Loh Tien (Haku-raku-ten)
    practised Zen, but at the same time believed in Amitabha; so also Su
    Shih (So-shoku), a most noted Zen practiser, worshipped the same
    Buddha, Yang Kieh (Yo-keteu), who carried a picture of Amitabha
    wherever he went and worshipped it, seems to have thought there is
    nothing incompatible between Zen and his faith. The foremost of
    those Zen masters of the Sung dynasty that attempted the amalgamation
    is Yung Ming (Yo-myo, died in 975), who reconciled Zen with the
    worship of Amitabha in his Wan Shen Tung Kwei Tsih
    (Man-zen-do-ki-shu) and Si Ngan Yan Shan Fu (Sei-an-yo-sin-fu). He
    was followed by Tsing Tsz (Jo-ji) and Chan Hieh (Shin-ketsu, lived
    about 1151), the former of whom wrote Kwei Yuen Chih Chi
    (Ki-gen-jiki-shi), and the latter Tsing Tu Sin Yao (Jo-do-sin-yo), in
    order to further the tendency. In the Yuen dynasty Chung Fung
    (Chu-ho, died in 1323) encouraged the adoration of Amitabha, together
    with the practice of Zen, in his poetical composition
    (Kwan-shu-jo-go). In the Ming dynasty Yun Si (Un-sei, died in 1615),
    the author of Shen Kwan Tseh Tsin (Zen-kwan-saku-shin) and other
    numerous works, writing a commentary on Sukhavati-vyuha-sutra,
    brought the amalgamation to its height. Ku Shan (Ku-zan, died in
    1657), a Zen historian and author, and his prominent disciple Wei Lin
    (E-rin), axe well known as the amalgamators. Yun Ming declared that
    those who practise Zen, but have no faith in Amitabha, go astray in
    nine cases out of ten; that those who do not practise Zen, but
    believe in Amitabha, are saved, one and all; that those who practise
    Zen, and have the faith in Amitabha, are like the tiger provided with
    wings; and that for those who have no faith in Amitabha, nor practise
    Zen, there exist the iron floor and the copper pillars in Hell. Ku
    Shan said that some practise Zen in order to attain Enlightenment,
    while others pray Amitabha for salvation; that if they were sincere
    and diligent, both will obtain the final beatitude. Wei Lin also
    observed: "Theoretically I embrace Zen, and practically I worship
    Amitabha." E-chu, the author of Zen-to-nenbutsu ('On Zen and the
    Worship of Amitabha'), points out that one of the direct disciples of
    the Sixth Patriarch favoured the faith of Amitabha, but there is no
    trustworthy evidence, as far as we know, that proves the existence of
    the amalgamation in the Tang dynasty.

    This tendency steadily increasing with time brought out at length the
    period of amalgamation which covered the Yuen (1280-1367) and the
    Ming dynasties (1368-1659), when the prayer for Amitabha was in every
    mouth of Zen monks sitting in Meditation. The patrons of Zen were
    not wanting in the Yuen dynasty, for such a warlike monarch as the
    Emperor Shi Tsu (Sei-so), 1280-1294) is known to have practised Zen
    under the instruction of Miao Kao, and his successor Ching Tsung
    (1295-1307) to have trusted in Yih Shan,[FN#60] a Zen teacher of
    reputation at that time. Moreover, Lin Ping Chung (Rin-hei-cha, died
    in 1274), a powerful minister under Shi Tsu, who did much toward the
    establishment of the administrative system in that dynasty, had been
    a Zen monk, and never failed to patronize his faith. And in the Ming
    dynasty the first Emperor Tai Tsu (1368-1398), having been a Zen
    monk, protected the sect with enthusiasm, and his example was
    followed by Tai Tsung (1403-1424), whose spiritual as well as
    political adviser was Tao Yen, a Zen monk of distinction. Thus Zen
    exercised an influence unparalleled by any other faith throughout
    these ages. The life and energy of Zen, however, was gone by the
    ignoble amalgamation, and even such great scholars as Chung
    Fung,[FN#61] Yung Si,[FN#62] Yung Kioh,[FN#63] were not free from the
    overwhelming influence of the age.

    [FN#60] The Emperor sent him to Japan in 1299 with some secret
    order, but he did nothing political, and stayed as a Zen teacher
    until his death.

    [FN#61] A most renowned Zen master in the Yuen dynasty, whom the
    Emperor Jan Tsung invited to visit the palace, but in vain.

    [FN#62] An author noted for his learning and virtues, who was rather
    a worshipper of Amitabha than a Zen monk.

    [FN#63] An author of voluminous books, of which Tung Shang Ku Cheh
    (To-jo-ko-tetsu) is well known.

    We are not, however, doing justice to the tendency of amalgamation in
    these times simply to blame it for its obnoxious results, because it
    is beyond doubt that it brought forth wholesome fruits to the Chinese
    literature and philosophy. Who can deny that this tendency brought
    the Speculative[FN#64] philosophy of the Sung dynasty to its
    consummation by the amalgamation of Confucianism with Buddhism
    especially with Zen, to enable it to exercise long-standing influence
    on society, and that this tendency also produced Wang Yang
    Ming,[FN#65] one of the greatest generals and scholars that the world
    has ever seen, whose philosophy of Conscience[FN#66] still holds a
    unique position in the history of human thought? Who can deny
    furthermore that Wang's philosophy is Zen in the Confucian

    [FN#64] This well-known philosophy was first taught by Cheu Men Shuh
    (Shu-mo-shiku, died in 1073) in its definite form. He is said to
    have been enlightened by the instruction of Hwui Tang, a contemporary
    Zen master. He was succeeded by Chang Ming Tao (Tei-mei-do, died in
    1085) and Chang I Chwen (Tei-i-sen, died in 1107), two brothers, who
    developed the philosophy in no small degree. And it was completed by
    Chu Tsz (Shu-shi, died in 1200), a celebrated commentator of the
    Confucian classics. It is worthy to note that these scholars
    practised Meditation just as Zen monks. See 'History of Chinese
    Philosophy' (pp. 215-269), by G. Nakauchi, and 'History of
    Development of Chinese Thought,' by R. Endo.

    [FN#65] He was born in 1472, and died in 1529. His doctrine
    exercised a most fruitful influence on many of the great Japanese
    minds, and undoubtedly has done much to the progress of New Japan.

    [FN#66] See Den-shu-roku and O-ya-mei-zen-sho.



    1. The Establishment of the Rin Zai[FN#67] School of Zen in Japan.

    [FN#67] The Lin Tsi school was started by Nan Yoh, a prominent
    disciple of the Sixth Patriarch, and completed by Lin Tsi or Rin Zai.

    The introduction of Zen into the island empire is dated as early as
    the seventh century;[FN#68] but it was in 1191 that it was first
    established by Ei-sai, a man of bold, energetic nature. He crossed
    the sea for China at the age of twenty-eight in 1168, after his
    profound study of the whole Tripitaka[FN#69] for eight years in the
    Hi-yei Monastery[FN#70] the then centre of Japanese Buddhism.

    [FN#68] Zen was first introduced into Japan by Do sha (629-700) as
    early as 653-656, at the time when the Fifth Patriarch just entered
    his patriarchal career. Do-sho went over to China in 653, and met
    with Huen Tsang, the celebrated and great scholar, who taught him the
    doctrine of the Dharma-laksana. It was Huen Tsang who advised Do-sho
    to study Zen under Hwui Man (E-man). After returning home, he built
    a Meditation Hall for the purpose of practising Zen in the Gan-go
    monastery, Nara. Thus Zen was first transplanted into Japan by
    Do-sho, but it took no root in the soil at that time.

    Next a Chinese Zen teacher, I Kung (Gi-ku), came over to Japan in
    about 810, and under his instruction the Empress Danrin, a most
    enthusiastic Buddhist, was enlightened. She erected a monastery
    named Dan-rin-ji, and appointed I Kung the abbot of it for the sake
    of propagating the faith. It being of no purpose, however, I Kung
    went back to China after some years.

    Thirdly, Kaku-a in 1171 went over to China, where he studied Zen
    under Fuh Hai (Buk-kai), who belonged to the Yang Ki (Yo-gi) school,
    and came home after three years. Being questioned by the Emperor
    Taka-kura (1169-1180) about the doctrine of Zen, he uttered no word,
    but took up a flute and played on it. But his first note was too
    high to be caught by the ordinary ear, and was gone without producing
    any echo in the court nor in society at large.

    [FN#69] The three divisions of the Buddhist canon, viz.:

    (1) Sutra-pitaka, or a collection of doctrinal books.
    (2) Vinaya-pitaka, or a collection of works on discipline.
    (3) Abhidharma-pitaka, or a collection of philosophical and
    expository works.

    [FN#70] The great monastery erected in 788 by Sai-cho (767-822), the
    founder of the Japanese Ten Dai Sect, known as Den Gyo Dai Shi.

    After visiting holy places and great monasteries, he came home,
    bringing with him over thirty different books on the doctrine of the
    Ten-Dai Sect.[FN#71] This, instead of quenching, added fuel to his
    burning desire for adventurous travel abroad. So he crossed the sea
    over again in 1187, this time intending to make pilgrimage to India;
    and no one can tell what might have been the result if the Chinese
    authorities did not forbid him to cross the border. Thereon he
    turned his attention to the study of Zen, and after five years'
    discipline succeeded in getting sanction for his spiritual attainment
    by the Hu Ngan (Kio-an), a noted master of the Rin Zai school, the
    then abbot of the monastery of Tien Tung Shan (Ten-do-san). His
    active propaganda of Zen was commenced soon after his return in 1191
    with splendid success at a newly built temple[FN#72] in the province
    of Chiku-zen. In 1202 Yori-iye, the Shogun, or the real governor of
    the State at that time, erected the monastery of Ken-nin-ji in the
    city of Kyo-to, and invited him to proceed to the metropolis.
    Accordingly he settled himself down in that temple, and taught Zen
    with his characteristic activity.

    [FN#71] The sect was named after its founder in China, Chi I
    (538-597), who lived in the monastery of Tien Tai Shan (Ten-dai-san),
    and was called the Great Teacher of Tien Tai. In 804 Den-gyo went
    over to China by the Imperial order, and received the transmission of
    the doctrine from Tao Sui (Do-sui), a patriarch of the sect. After
    his return he erected a monastery on Mount Hi-yei, which became the
    centre of Buddhistic learning.

    [FN#72] He erected the monastery of Sho-fuku-ji in 1195, which is
    still prospering.

    This provoked the envy and wrath of the Ten Dai and the Shin
    Gon[FN#73] teachers, who presented memorials to the Imperial court to
    protest against his propagandism of the new faith. Taking advantage
    of the protests, Ei-sai wrote a book entitled Ko-zen-go-koku-ron
    ('The Protection of the State by the Propagation of Zen'), and not
    only explained his own position, but exposed the ignorance[FN#74] of
    the protestants. Thus at last his merit was appreciated by the
    Emperor Tsuchi-mikado (1199-1210), and he was promoted to So Jo, the
    highest rank in the Buddhist priesthood, together with the gift of a
    purple robe in 1206. Some time after this he went to the city of
    Kama-kura, the political centre, being invited by Sane-tomo, the
    Shogun, and laid the foundation of the so-called Kama-kura Zen, still
    prospering at the present moment.

    [FN#73] The Shin Gon or Mantra Sect is based on
    Mahavairocanabhi-sambodhi-sutra, Vajracekhara-sutra, and other
    Mantra-sutras. It was established in China by Vajrabodhi and his
    disciple Amoahavajra, who came from India in 720. Ku kai (774-835),
    well known as Ko Bo Dai Shi, went to China in 804, and received the
    transmission of the doctrine from Hwui Kwo (Kei-ka), a, disciple of
    Amoghavajra. In 806 he came back and propagated the faith almost all
    over the country. For the detail see 'A Short History of the Twelve
    Japanese Buddhist Sects' (chap. viii.), by Dr. Nanjo.

    [FN#74] Sai-cho, the founder of the Japanese Ten Dai Sect, first
    learned the doctrine of the Northern School of Zen under Gyo-hyo
    (died in 797), and afterwards he pursued the study of the same faith
    under Siao Jan in China. Therefore to oppose the propagation of Zen
    is, for Ten Dai priests, as much as to oppose the founder of their
    own sect.

    2. The Introduction of the So-To School[FN#75] of Zen.

    [FN#75] This school was started by Tsing-Yuen (Sei-gen), an eminent
    disciple of the Sixth Patriarch, and completed by Tsing Shan (To-zan).

    Although the Rin Zai school was, as mentioned above, established by
    Ei-sai, yet he himself was not a pure Zen teacher, being a Ten Dai
    scholar as well as an experienced practiser of Mantra. The first
    establishment of Zen in its purest form was done by Do-gen, now known
    as Jo Yo Dai Shi. Like Ei-sai, he was admitted into the Hi-yei
    Monastery at an early age, and devoted himself to the study of the
    Canon. As his scriptural knowledge increased, he was troubled by
    inexpressible doubts and fears, as is usual with great religious
    teachers. Consequently, one day he consulted his uncle, Ko-in, a
    distinguished Ten Dai scholar, about his troubles. The latter, being
    unable to satisfy him, recommended him Ei-sai, the founder of the new
    faith. But as Ei-sai died soon afterwards, he felt that he had no
    competent teacher left, and crossed the sea for China, at the age of
    twenty-four, in 1223. There he was admitted into the monastery of
    Tien Tung Shan (Ten-do-san), and assigned the lowest seat in the
    hall, simply because be was a foreigner. Against this affront he
    strongly protested. In the Buddhist community, he said, all were
    brothers, and there was no difference of nationality. The only way
    to rank the brethren was by seniority, and he therefore claimed to
    occupy his proper rank. Nobody, however, lent an ear to the poor
    new-comer's protest, so he appealed twice to the Chinese Emperor Ning
    Tsung (1195-1224), and by the Imperial order he gained his object.

    After four years' study and discipline, he was Enlightened and
    acknowledged as the successor by his master Ju Tsing (Nyo-jo died in
    1228), who belonged to the Tsao Tung (So To) school. He came home in
    1227, bringing with him three important Zen books.[FN#76] Some three
    years he did what Bodhidharma, the Wall-gazing Brahmin, had done
    seven hundred years before him, retiring to a hermitage at Fuka-kusa,
    not very far from Kyo-to. Just like Bodhidharma, denouncing all
    worldly fame and gain, his attitude toward the world was
    diametrically opposed to that of Ei-sai. As we have seen above,
    Ei-sai never shunned, but rather sought the society of the powerful
    and the rich, and made for his goal by every means. But to the Sage
    of Fuka-kusa, as Do-gen was called at that time, pomp and power was
    the most disgusting thing in the world. Judging from his poems, be
    seems to have spent these years chiefly in meditation; dwelling now
    on the transitoriness of life, now on the eternal peace of Nirvana;
    now on the vanities and miseries of the world; now listening to the
    voices of Nature amongst the hills; now gazing into the brooklet that
    was, as he thought, carrying away his image reflected on it into the

    [FN#76] (1) Pao King San Mei (Ho-kyo-san-mai, 'Precious Mirror
    Samadhi'), a metrical exposition of Zen, by Tung Shan (To-zan,
    806-869), one of the founders of the So To school. (2) Wu Wei Hien
    Hueh (Go-i-ken-ketsu. 'Explanation of the Five Categories'), by Tung
    Shan and his disciple Tsao Shan (So-zan). This book shows us how Zen
    was systematically taught by the authors. (3) Pih Yen Tsih
    (Heki-gan-shu, 'A Collection and Critical Treatment of Dialogues'),
    by Yuen Wu.

    3. The Characteristics of Do-gen, the Founder of the Japanese So To

    In the meantime seekers after a new truth gradually began to knock at
    his door, and his hermitage was turned into a monastery, now known as
    the Temple of Ko-sho-ji.[FN#77] It was at this time that many
    Buddhist scholars and men of quality gathered about him but the more
    popular he became the more disgusting the place became to him. His
    hearty desire was to live in a solitude among mountains, far distant
    from human abodes, where none but falling waters and singing birds
    could disturb his delightful meditation. Therefore he gladly
    accepted the invitation of a feudal lord, and went to the province of
    Echi-zen, where his ideal monastery was built, now known as

    [FN#77] It was in this monastery (built in 1236) that Zen was first
    taught as an independent sect, and that the Meditation Hall was first
    opened in Japan. Do-gen lived in the monastery for eleven years, and
    wrote some of the important books. Za-zen-gi ('The Method of
    Practising the Cross-legged Meditation') was written soon after his
    return from China, and Ben-do-wa and other essays followed, which are
    included in his great work, entitled Sho-bo-gen-zo) ('The Eye and
    Treasury of the Right Law').

    [FN#78] The monastery was built in 1244 by Yoshi-shige (Hatano), the
    feudal lord who invited Do-gen. He lived in Ei-hei-ji until his
    death, which took place in 1253. It is still flourishing as the head
    temple of the So To Sect.

    In 1247, being requested by Toki-yori, the Regent General
    (1247-1263), he came down to Kama-kura, where he stayed half a year
    and went back to Ei-hei-ji. After some time Toki-yori, to show his
    gratitude for the master, drew up a certificate granting a large
    tract of land as the property of Ei-hei-ji, and handed it over to
    Gen-myo, a disciple of Do-gen. The carrier of the certificate was so
    pleased with the donation that he displayed it to all his brethren
    and produced it before the master, who severely reproached him
    saying: "O, shame on thee, wretch! Thou art -defiled by the desire
    of worldly riches even to thy inmost soul, just as noodle is stained
    with oil. Thou canst not be purified from it to all eternity. I am
    afraid thou wilt bring shame on the Right Law." On the spot Gen-myo
    was deprived of his holy robe and excommunicated. Furthermore, the
    master ordered the 'polluted' seat in the Meditation Hall, where
    Gen-myo was wont to sit, to be removed, and the 'polluted' earth
    under the seat to be dug out to the depth of seven feet.

    In 1250 the ex-Emperor Go-sa-ga (1243-1246) sent a special messenger
    twice to the Ei-hei monastery to do honour to the master with the
    donation of a purple robe, but he declined to accept it. And when
    the mark of distinction was offered for the third time, he accepted
    it, expressing his feelings by the following verses:

    "Although in Ei-hei's vale the shallow waters leap,
    Yet thrice it came, Imperial favour deep.
    The Ape may smile and laugh the Crane
    At aged Monk in purple as insane."

    He was never seen putting on the purple robe, being always clad in
    black, that was better suited to his secluded life.

    4. The Social State of Japan when Zen was established by Ei-sai and

    Now we have to observe the condition of the country when Zen was
    introduced into Japan by Ei-sai and Do-gen. Nobilities that had so
    long governed the island were nobilities no more. Enervated by their
    luxuries, effeminated by their ease, made insipient by their
    debauchery, they were entirely powerless. All that they possessed in
    reality was the nominal rank and hereditary birth. On the contrary,
    despised as the ignorant, sneered at as the upstart, put in contempt
    as the vulgar, the Samurai or military class had everything in their
    hands. It was the time when Yori-tomo[FN#79] (1148-1199) conquered
    all over the empire, and established the Samurai Government at
    Kama-kura. It was the time when even the emperors were dethroned or
    exiled at will by the Samurai. It was the time when even the
    Buddhist monks[FN#80] frequently took up arms to force their will.
    It was the time when Japan's independence was endangered by Kublai,
    the terror of the world. It was the time when the whole nation was
    full of martial spirit. It is beyond doubt that to these rising
    Samurais, rude and simple, the philosophical doctrines of Buddhism,
    represented by Ten Dai and Shin Gon, were too complicated and too
    alien to their nature. But in Zen they could find something
    congenial to their nature, something that touched their chord of
    sympathy, because Zen was the doctrine of chivalry in a certain sense.

    [FN#79] The Samurai Government was first established by Yoritomo, of
    the Minamoto family, in 1186, and Japan was under the control of the
    military class until 1867, when the political power was finally
    restored to the Imperial house.

    [FN#80] They were degenerated monks (who were called monk-soldiers),
    belonging to great monasteries such as En-ryaku-ji (Hi-yei),
    Ko-fuku-ji (at Nara), Mi-i-dera, etc.

    5. The Resemblance of the Zen Monk to the Samurai.

    Let us point out in brief the similarities between Zen and Japanese
    chivalry. First, both the Samurai and the Zen monk have to undergo a
    strict discipline and endure privation without complaint. Even such
    a prominent teacher as Ei-sai, for example, lived contentedly in such
    needy circumstances that on one occasion[FN#81] he and his disciples
    had nothing to eat for several days. Fortunately, they were
    requested by a believer to recite the Scriptures, and presented with
    two rolls of silk. The hungry young monks, whose mouths watered
    already at the expectation of a long-looked-for dinner, were
    disappointed when that silk was given to a poor man, who called on
    Ei-sai to obtain some help. Fast continued for a whole week, when
    another poor follow came in and asked Ei-sai to give something. At
    this time, having nothing to show his substantial mark of sympathy
    towards the poor, Ei-sai tore off the gilt glory of the image of
    Buddha Bhecajya and gave it. The young monks, bitten both by hunger
    and by anger at this outrageous act to the object of worship,
    questioned Ei-sai by way of reproach: "Is it, sir, right for us
    Buddhists to demolish the image of a Buddha?" "Well," replied Ei-sai
    promptly, "Buddha would give even his own life for the sake of
    suffering people. How could he be reluctant to give his halo?" This
    anecdote clearly shows us self-sacrifice is of first importance in
    the Zen discipline.

    [FN#81] The incident is told by Do-gen in his Zui-mon-ki.

    6. The Honest Poverty of the Zen Monk and the Samurai.

    Secondly, the so-called honest poverty is a characteristic of both
    the Zen monk and the Samurai. To get rich by an ignoble means is
    against the rules of Japanese chivalry or Bushido. The Samurai would
    rather starve than to live by some expedient unworthy of his dignity.
    There are many instances, in the Japanese history, of Samurais who
    were really starved to death in spite of their having a hundred
    pieces of gold carefully preserved to meet the expenses at the time
    of an emergency; hence the proverb: "The falcon would not feed on the
    ear of corn, even if he should starve." Similarly, we know of no
    case of Zen monks, ancient and modern, who got rich by any ignoble
    means. They would rather face poverty with gladness of heart.
    Fu-gai, one of the most distinguished Zen masters just before the
    Restoration, supported many student monks in his monastery. They
    were often too numerous to be supported by his scant means. This
    troubled his disciple much whose duty it was to look after the
    food-supply, as there was no other means to meet the increased demand
    than to supply with worse stuff. Accordingly, one day the disciple
    advised Fu-gai not to admit new students any more into the monastery.
    Then the master, making no reply, lolled out his tongue and said:
    "Now look into my mouth, and tell if there be any tongue in it." The
    perplexed disciple answered affirmatively. "Then don't bother
    yourself about it. If there be any tongue, I can taste any sort of
    food." Honest poverty may, without exaggeration, be called one of
    the characteristics of the Samurais and of the Zen monks; hence a
    proverb: "The Zen monk has no money, moneyed Monto[FN#82] knows

    [FN#82] The priest belonging to Shin Shu, who are generally rich.

    7. The Manliness of the Zen Monk and of the Samurai.

    Thirdly, both the Zen monk and the Samurai were distinguished by
    their manliness and dignity in manner, sometimes amounting to
    rudeness. This is due partly to the hard discipline that they
    underwent, and partly to the mode of instruction. The following
    story,[FN#83] translated by Mr. D. Suzuki, a friend of mine, may well
    exemplify our statement:

    [FN#83] The Journal of the Pali Text Society, 1906-1907.

    When Rin-zai[FN#84] was assiduously applying himself to Zen
    discipline under Obak (Huang Po in Chinese, who died 850), the head
    monk recognized his genius. One day the monk asked him how long he
    had been in the monastery, to which Rin-zai replied: 'Three years.'
    The elder said: 'Have you ever approached the master and asked his
    instruction in Buddhism?' Rin-zai said: 'I have never done this, for
    I did not know what to ask.' 'Why, you might go to the master and
    ask him what is the essence of Buddhism?'

    [FN#84] Lin Tsi, the founder of the Lin Tsi school.

    "Rin-zai, according to this advice, approached Obak and repeated the
    question, but before he finished the master gave him a slap.

    "When Rin-zai came back, the elder asked how the interview went.
    Said Rin-zai: 'Before I could finish my question the master slapped
    me, but I fail to grasp its meaning.' The elder said: 'You go to him
    again and ask the same question.' When he did so, he received the
    same response from the master. But Rin-zai was urged again to try it
    for the third time, but the outcome did not improve.

    "At last he went to the elder, and said 'In obedience to your kind
    suggestion, I have repeated my question three times, and been slapped
    three times. I deeply regret that, owing to my stupidity, I am
    unable to comprehend the hidden meaning of all this. I shall leave
    this place and go somewhere else.' Said the elder: 'If you wish to
    depart, do not fail to go and see the master to say him farewell.'

    "Immediately after this the elder saw the master, and said: 'That
    young novice, who asked about Buddhism three times, is a remarkable
    fellow. When he comes to take leave of you, be so gracious as to
    direct him properly. After a hard training, he will prove to be a
    great master, and, like a huge tree, he will give a refreshing
    shelter to the world.'

    "When Rin-zai came to see the master, the latter advised him not to
    go anywhere else, but to Dai-gu (Tai-yu) of Kaoan, for he would be
    able to instruct him in the faith.

    "Rin-zai went to Dai-gu, who asked him whence he came. Being
    informed that he was from Obak, Dai-gu further inquired what
    instruction he had under the master. Rin-zai answered: 'I asked him
    three times about the essence of Buddhism, and he slapped me three
    times. But I am yet unable to see whether I had any fault or not.'
    Dai-gu said: 'Obak was tender-hearted even as a dotard, and you are
    not warranted at all to come over here and ask me whether anything
    was faulty with you.'

    "Being thus reprimanded, the signification of the whole affair
    suddenly dawned upon the mind of Rin-zai, and he exclaimed: 'There is
    not much, after all, in the Buddhism of Obak.' Whereupon Dai-gu took
    hold of him, and said: 'This ghostly good-for-nothing creature! A
    few minutes ago you came to me and complainingly asked what was wrong
    with you, and now boldly declare that there is not much in the
    Buddhism of Obak. What is the reason of all this? Speak out quick!
    speak out quick!' In response to this, Rin-zai softly struck three
    times his fist at the ribs of Dai-gu. The latter then released him,
    saying: 'Your teacher is Obak, and I will have nothing to do with

    "Rin-zai took leave of Dai-gu and came back to Obak, who, on seeing
    him come, exclaimed: 'Foolish fellow! what does it avail you to come
    and go all the time like this?' Rin-zai said: 'It is all due to your
    doting kindness.'

    "When, after the usual salutation, Rin-zai stood by the side of Obak,
    the latter asked him whence he had come this time. Rin-zai answered:
    "In obedience to your kind instruction, I was with Dai-gu. Thence am
    I come.'

    And he related, being asked for further information, all that had
    happened there.

    "Obak said: 'As soon as that fellow shows himself up here, I shall
    have to give him a good thrashing.' 'You need not wait for him to
    come; have it right this moment,' was the reply; and with this
    Rin-zai gave his master a slap on the back.

    "Obak said: 'How dares this lunatic come into my presence and play
    with a tiger's whiskers?' Rin-zai then burst out into a Ho,[FN#85]
    and Obak said: 'Attendant, come and carry this lunatic away to his

    [FN#85] A loud outcry, frequently made use of by Zen teachers, after
    Rin-zai. Its Chinese pronunciation is 'Hoh,' and pronounced 'Katsu'
    in Japanese, but 'tsu' is not audible.

    8. The Courage and the Composure of Mind of the Zen Monk and of the

    Fourthly, our Samurai encountered death, as is well known, with
    unflinching courage. He would never turn back from, but fight till
    his last with his enemy. To be called a coward was for him the
    dishonour worse than death itself. An incident about Tsu Yuen
    (So-gen), who came over to Japan in 1280, being invited by
    Toki-mune[FN#86] (Ho-jo), the Regent General, well illustrates how
    much Zen monks resembled our Samurais. The event happened when he
    was in China, where the invading army of Yuen spread terror all over
    the country. Some of the barbarians, who crossed the border of the
    State of Wan, broke into the monastery of Tsu Yuen, and threatened to
    behead him. Then calmly sitting down, ready to meet his fate, he
    composed the following verses

    "The heaven and earth afford me no shelter at all;
    I'm glad, unreal are body and soul.
    Welcome thy weapon, O warrior of Yuen! Thy trusty steel,
    That flashes lightning, cuts the wind of Spring, I feel."

    [FN#86] A bold statesman and soldier, who was the real ruler of
    Japan 1264-1283.

    This reminds us of Sang Chao[FN#87] (So-jo), who, on the verge of
    death by the vagabond's sword, expressed his feelings in the follow

    "In body there exists no soul.
    The mind is not real at all.
    Now try on me thy flashing steel,
    As if it cuts the wind of Spring, I feel."

    [FN#87] The man was not a pure Zen master, being a disciple of
    Kumarajiva, the founder of the San Ron Sect. This is a most
    remarkable evidence that Zen, especially the Rin Zan school, was
    influenced by Kumarajiva and his disciples. For the details of the
    anecdote, see E-gen.

    The barbarians, moved by this calm resolution and dignified air of
    Tsu Yuen, rightly supposed him to be no ordinary personage, and left
    the monastery, doing no harm to him.

    9. Zen and the Regent Generals of the Ho-Jo Period.

    No wonder, then, that the representatives of the Samurai class, the
    Regent Generals, especially such able rulers as Toki-yori, Toki-mune,
    and others noted for their good administration, of the Ho-jo period
    (1205-1332) greatly favoured Zen. They not only patronized the
    faith, building great temples[FN#88] and inviting best Chinese Zen
    teachers[FN#89] but also lived just as Zen monks, having the head
    shaven, wearing a holy robe, and practising cross-legged Meditation.

    [FN#88] To-fuku-ji, the head temple of a sub-sect of the Rin Zai
    under the same name, was built in 1243. Ken-cho-ji, the head temple
    of a subsect of the Rin Zai under the same name, was built in 1253.
    En-gaku ji, the head temple of a sub-sect of the Rin Zai under the
    same name, was built in 1282. Nan-zen-ji, the head temple of a
    sub-sect of the Rin Zai under the same name, was erected in 1326.

    [FN#89] Tao Lung (Do-ryu), known as Dai-kaku Zen-ji, invited by
    Tokiyori, came over to Japan in 1246. He became the founder of
    Ken-cho-ji-ha, a sub-sect of the Rin Zai, and died in 1278. Of his
    disciples, Yaku-o was most noted, and Yaku-o's disciple, Jaku-shitsu,
    became the founder of Yo-genji-ha, another sub-sect of the Rin Zai.
    Tsu Yuen (So-gen), known as Buk-ko-koku-shi, invited by Toki-mune,
    crossed the sea in 1280, became the founder of En-gaku-ji-ha (a
    sub-sect of the Rin Zai), and died in 1286. Tsing Choh (Sei-setsu),
    invited by Taka-toki, came in 1327, and died in 1339. Chu Tsun
    (So-shun) came in 1331, and died in 1336. Fan Sien (Bon-sen) came
    together with Chu Tsun, and died in 1348. These were the prominent
    Chinese teachers of that time.

    Toki-yori (1247-1263), for instance, who entered the monastic life
    while be was still the real governor of the country, led as simple a
    life, as is shown in his verse, which ran as follows:

    "Higher than its bank the rivulet flows;
    Greener than moss tiny grass grows.
    No one call at my humble cottage on the rock,
    But the gate by itself opens to the Wind's knock."

    Toki-yori attained to Enlightenment by the instruction of Do-gen and
    Do-ryu, and breathed his last calmly sitting cross-legged, and
    expressing his feelings in the following lines:

    "Thirty-seven of years,
    Karma mirror stood high;
    Now I break it to pieces,
    Path of Great is then nigh."

    His successor, Toki-mune (1264-1283), a bold statesman and soldier,
    was no less of a devoted believer in Zen. Twice he beheaded the
    envoys sent by the great Chinese conqueror, Kublai, who demanded
    Japan should either surrender or be trodden under his foot. And when
    the alarming news of the Chinese Armada's approaching the land
    reached him, be is said to have called on his tutor, Tsu Yuen, to
    receive the last instruction. "Now, reverend sir," said. he, "an
    imminent peril threatens the land." "How art thou going to encounter
    it?" asked the master. Then Toki-mune burst into a thundering Ka
    with all his might to show his undaunted spirit in encountering the
    approaching enemy. "O, the lion's roar!" said Tsu Yuen.

    "Thou art a genuine lion. Go, and never turn back." Thus encouraged
    by the teacher, the Regent General sent out the defending army, and
    successfully rescued the state from the mouth of destruction, gaining
    a splendid victory over the invaders, almost all of whom perished in
    the western seas.

    10. Zen after the Downfall of the Ho-Jo Regency.

    Towards the end of the Ho-Jo period,[FN#90] and after the downfall of
    the Regency in 1333, sanguinary battles were fought between the
    Imperialists and the rebels. The former, brave and faithful as they
    were, being outnumbered by the latter, perished in the field one
    after another for the sake of the ill-starred Emperor Go-dai-go
    (1319-1338), whose eventful life ended in anxiety and despair.

    [FN#90] Although Zen was first favoured by the Ho-jo Regency and
    chiefly prospered at Kama-kura, yet it rapidly began to exercise its
    influence on nobles and Emperors at Kyo-to. This is mainly due to
    the activity of En-ni, known as Sho-Ichi-Koku-Shi (1202-1280), who
    first earned Zen under Gyo-yu, a disciple of Ei-sai, and afterwards
    went to China, where he was Enlightened under the instruction of Wu
    Chun, of the monastery of King Shan. After his return, Michi-iye
    (Fuji-wara), a powerful nobleman, erected for him To-fuku-ji in 1243,
    and he became the founder of a sub-sect of the Rin Zai, named after
    that monastery. The Emperor Go-saga (1243-1246), an admirer of his,
    received the Moral Precepts from him. One of his disciples, To-zan,
    became the spiritual adviser of the Emperor Fushi-mi (1288-1298), and
    another disciple, Mu kwan, was created the abbot of the monastery of
    Nan-zen-ji by the Emperor Kame-yama (1260-1274), as the founder of a
    sub-sect of the Rin Zai under the same name.

    Another teacher who gained lasting influence on the Court is Nan-po,
    known as Dai-O-Koku-Shi (1235-1308), who was appointed the abbot of
    the monastery of Man-ju-ji in Kyo to by the Emperor Fushi-mi. One of
    his disciples, Tsu-o, was the spiritual adviser to both the Emperor
    Hana-zono (1308-1318) and the Emperor Go-dai-go. And another
    disciple, Myo-cho, known as Dai-To-Koku-Shi (1282-1337), also was
    admired by the two Emperors, and created the abbot of Dai-toku-ji, as
    the founder of a sub-sect of the Rin Zai under the same name. It was
    for Myo-cho's disciple, Kan-zan (1277 1360), that the Emperor
    Hana-zono turned his detached palace into a monastery, named
    Myo-shin-ji, the head temple of a sub-sect of the Rin Zai under the
    same name.

    It was at this time that Japan gave birth to Masa-shige (Kusu-noki),
    an able general and tactician of the Imperialists, who for the sake
    of the Emperor not only sacrificed himself and his brother, but by
    his will his son and his son's successor died for the same cause,
    boldly attacking the enemy whose number was overwhelmingly great.
    Masa-shige's loyalty, wisdom, bravery, and prudence are not merely
    unique in the history of Japan, but perhaps in the history of man.
    The tragic tale about his parting with his beloved son, and his
    bravery shown at his last battle, never fail to inspire the Japanese
    with heroism. He is the best specimen of the Samurai class.
    According to an old document,[FN#91] this Masa-shige was the
    practiser of Zen, and just before his last battle he called on Chu
    Tsun (So-shun) to receive the final instruction. "What have I to do
    when death takes the place of life?" asked Masa-shige. The teacher

    "Be bold, at once cut off both ties,
    The drawn sword gleams against the skies."

    Thus becoming, as it were, an indispensable discipline for the
    Samurai, Zen never came to an end with the Ho-jo period, but grew
    more prosperous than before during the reign[FN#92] of the Emperor
    Go-dai-go, one of the most enthusiastic patrons of the faith.

    [FN#91] The event is detailed at length in a life of So-shun, but
    some historians suspect it to be fictitious. This awaits a further

    [FN#92] As we have already mentioned, Do-gen, the founder of the
    Japanese So To Sect, shunned the society of the rich and the
    powerful, and led a secluded life. In consequence his sect did not
    make any rapid progress until the Fourth Patriarch of his line,
    Kei-zan (1268-1325) who, being of energetic spirit, spread his faith
    with remarkable activity, building many large monasteries, of which
    Yo-ko-ji, in the province of No-to, So-ji-ji (near Yokohama), one of
    the head temples of the sect, are well known. One of his disciples,
    Mei ho (1277-1350), propagated the faith in the northern provinces;
    while another disciple, Ga-san (1275-1365), being a greater
    character, brought up more than thirty distinguished disciples, of
    whom Tai-gen, Tsu-gen, Mu-tan, Dai-tetsu, and Jip-po, are best known.
    Tai-gen (died 1370) and big successors propagated the faith over the
    middle provinces, while Tsu-gen (1332-1391) and his successors spread
    the sect all over the north-eastern and south-western provinces.
    Thus it is worthy of our notice that most of the Rin Zai teachers
    confined their activities within Kamakura and Kyo-to, while the So To
    masters spread the faith all over the country.

    The Shoguns of the Ashi-kaga period (1338-1573) were not less devoted
    to the faith than the Emperors who succeeded the Emperor Go-dai-go.
    And even Taka-uji (1338-1357), the notorious founder of the
    Shogunate, built a monastery and invited So-seki,[FN#93] better known
    as Mu-So-Koku-Shi, who was respected as the tutor by the three
    successive Emperors after Go-dai-go. Taka-uji's example was followed
    by all succeeding Shoguns, and Shogun's example was followed by the
    feudal lords and their vassals. This resulted in the propagation of
    Zen throughout the country. We can easily imagine how Zen was
    prosperous in these days from the splendid monasteries[FN#94] built
    at this period, such as the Golden Hall Temple and the Silver Hall
    Temple that still adorn the fair city of Kyo-to.

    [FN#93] So-seki (1276-1351) was perhaps the greatest Zen master of
    the period. Of numerous monasteries built for him, E-rin-ji, in the
    province of Kae, and Ten-ryu-ji, the head temple of a sub-sect of the
    Rin Zai under the same name, are of importance. Out of over seventy
    eminent disciples of his, Gi-do (1365-1388), the author of Ku-ge-shu;
    Shun-oku (1331-1338), the founder of the monastery of So-koku-ji, the
    head temple of a sub-sect of the Rin Zai under the same name; and
    Zek-kai (1337-1405), author of Sho-ken-shu, are best known.

    [FN#94] Myo-shin-ji was built in 1337 by the Emperor Hana-zono;
    Ten-ryu-ji was erected by Taka-uji, the first Shogun of the period,
    in 1344; So-koku-ji by Yosh-imitsu, the third Shogun, in 1385;
    Kin-Kaku-ji, or Golden Hall Temple, by the same Shogun, in 1397;
    Gin-kaku-ji, or Silver Hall Temple, by Yoshi-masa, the eighth Shogun,
    in 1480.

    11. Zen in the Dark Age.

    The latter half of the Ashikaga period was the age of arms and
    bloodshed. Every day the sun shone on the glittering armour of
    marching soldiers. Every wind sighed over the lifeless remains of
    the brave. Everywhere the din of battle resounded. Out of these
    fighting feudal lords stood two champions. Each of them
    distinguished himself as a veteran soldier and tactician. Each of
    them was known as an experienced practiser of Zen. One was
    Haru-nobu[FN#95] (Take-da, died in 1573), better known by his
    Buddhist name, Shin-gen. The other was Teru-tora[FN#96] (Uye-sugi,
    died in 1578), better known by his Buddhist name, Ken-shin. The
    character of Shin-gen can be imagined from the fact that he never
    built any castle or citadel or fortress to guard himself against his
    enemy, but relied on his faithful vassals and people; while that of
    Ken-shin, from the fact that he provided his enemy, Shin-gen, with
    salt when the latter suffered from want of it, owing to the cowardly
    stratagem of a rival lord. The heroic battles waged by these two
    great generals against each other are the flowers of the Japanese
    war-history. Tradition has it that when Shin-gen's army was put to
    rout by the furious attacks of Ken-shin's troops, and a single
    warrior mounted on a huge charger rode swiftly as a sweeping wind
    into Shin-gen's head-quarters, down came a blow of the heavy sword
    aimed at Shin-gen's forehead, with a question expressed in the
    technical terms of Zen: "What shalt thou do in such a state at such a
    moment?" Having no time to draw his sword, Shin-gen parried it with
    his war-fan, answering simultaneously in Zen words: "A flake of snow
    on the red-hot furnace!" Had not his attendants come to the rescue
    Shin-gen's life might have gone as 'a flake of snow on the red-hot
    furnace.' Afterwards the horseman was known to have been Ken-shin
    himself. This tradition shows us how Zen was practically lived by
    the Samurais of the Dark Age.

    [FN#95] Shin-gen practised Zen under the instruction of Kwai-sen,
    who was burned to death by Nobu-naga (O-da) in 1582. See

    [FN#96] Ken-shin learned Zen under Shu-ken, a So Ta master. See

    Although the priests of other Buddhist sects had their share in these
    bloody affairs, as was natural at such a time, yet Zen monks stood
    aloof and simply cultivated their literature. Consequently, when all
    the people grew entirely ignorant at the end of the Dark Age, the Zen
    monks were the only men of letters. None can deny this merit of
    their having preserved learning and prepared for its revival in the
    following period.[FN#97]

    [FN#97] After the introduction of Zen into Japan many important
    books were written, and the following are chief doctrinal works:
    Ko-zen-go-koku-ron, by Ei-sai; Sho bo-gen-zo; Gaku-do-yo-zin-shu;
    Fu-kwan-za-zen-gi; Ei-hei-ko-roku, by Do-gen; Za-zen-yo-zin-ki; and
    Den-ko-roku, by Kei-zan.

    12. Zen under the Toku-gana Shogunate.

    Peace was at last restored by Iye-yasu, the founder of the Toku-gana
    Shogunate (1603-1867). During this period the Shogunate gave
    countenance to Buddhism on one hand, acknowledging it as the state
    religion, bestowing rich property to large monasteries, making
    priests take rank over common people, ordering every householder to
    build a Buddhist altar in his house; while, on the other hand, it did
    everything to extirpate Christianity, introduced in the previous
    period (1544). All this paralyzed the missionary spirit of the
    Buddhists, and put all the sects in dormant state. As for Zen[FN#98]
    it was still favoured by feudal lords and their vassals, and almost
    all provincial lords embraced the faith.

    [FN#98] The So To Sect was not wanting in competent teachers, for it
    might take pride in its Ten-kei (1648-1699), whose religious insight
    was unsurpassed by any other master of the age; in its Shi getsu, who
    was a commentator of various Zen books, and died 1764; in its Men-zan
    (1683-1769), whose indefatigable works on the exposition of So To Zen
    are invaluable indeed; and its Getsu-shu (1618-1696) and Man-zan
    (1635-1714), to whose labours the reformation of the faith is
    ascribed. Similarly, the Rin Zai Sect, in its Gu-do (1579-1661); in
    its Isshi (1608-1646); in its Taku-an (1573-1645), the favourite
    tutor of the third Shogun, Iye-mitsu; in its Haku-in (1667-1751), the
    greatest of the Rin Zai masters of the day, to whose extraordinary
    personality and labour the revival of the sect is due; and its To-rei
    (1721-1792), a learned disciple of Haku-in. Of the important Zen
    books written by these masters, Ro-ji-tan-kin, by Ten-kei;
    Men-zan-ko-roku, by Men-zan; Ya-sen-kwan-wa, Soku-ko-roku,
    Kwai-an-koku-go, Kei-so-doku-zui, by Haku-in; Shu-mon-mu-jin-to-ron,
    by To-rei, are well known.

    It was about the middle of this period that the forty-seven vassals
    of Ako displayed the spirit of the Samurai by their perseverance,
    self-sacrifice, and loyalty, taking vengeance on the enemy of their
    deceased lord. The leader of these men, the tragic tales of whom can
    never be told or heard without tears, was Yoshi-o (O-ishi died 1702),
    a believer of Zen,[FN#99] and his tomb in the cemetery of the temple
    of Sen-gaku-ji, Tokyo, is daily visited by hundreds of his admirers.
    Most of the professional swordsmen forming a class in these days
    practised Zen. Mune-nori[FN#100](Ya-gyu), for instance, established
    his reputation by the combination of Zen and the fencing art.

    [FN#99] See "Zen Shu," No. 151.

    [FN#100] He is known as Ta-jima, who practised Zen under Taku-an.

    The following story about Boku-den (Tsuka-hara), a great swordsman,
    fully illustrates this tendency:

    "On a certain occasion Boku-den took a ferry to cross over the Yabase
    in the province of Omi. There was among the passengers a Samurai,
    tall and square-shouldered, apparently an experienced fencer. He
    behaved rudely toward the fellow-passengers, and talked so much of
    his own dexterity in the art that Boku-den, provoked by his brag,
    broke silence. 'You seem, my friend, to practise the art in order to
    conquer the enemy, but I do it in order not to be conquered,' said
    Boku-den. 'O monk,' demanded the man, as Boku-den was clad like a
    Zen monk, 'what school of swordsmanship do you belong to?' Well,
    mine is the Conquering-enemy-without-fighting-school.' 'Don't tell a
    fib, old monk. If you could conquer the enemy without fighting, what
    then is your sword for?' 'My sword is not to kill, but to save,'
    said Boku-den, making use of Zen phrases; 'my art is transmitted from
    mind to mind.' 'Now then, come, monk,' challenged the man, 'let us
    see, right at this moment, who is the victor, you or I.' The
    gauntlet was picked up without hesitation. 'But we must not fight,'
    said Boku-den, 'in the ferry, lest the passengers should be hurt.
    Yonder a small island you see. There we shall decide the contest.'
    To this proposal the man agreed, and the boat was pulled to that
    island. No sooner had the boat reached the shore than the man jumped
    over to the land, and cried: 'Come on, monk, quick, quick!'
    Boku-den, however, slowly rising, said: 'Do not hasten to lose your
    head. It is a rule of my school to prepare slowly for fighting,
    keeping the soul in the abdomen.' So saying he snatched the oar from
    the boatman and rowed the boat back to some distance, leaving the man
    alone, who, stamping the ground madly, cried out: 'O, you fly, monk,
    you coward. Come, old monk!' 'Now listen,' said Boku-den, 'this is
    the secret art of the Conquering-enemy-without-fighting-school.
    Beware that you do not forget it, nor tell it to anybody else.'
    Thus, getting rid of the brawling fellow, Boku-den and his
    fellow-passengers safely landed on the opposite shore."[FN#101] The
    O Baku School of Zen was introduced by Yin Yuen (In-gen) who crossed
    the sea in 1654, accompanied by many able disciples.[FN#102] The
    Shogunate gave him a tract of land at Uji, near Kyo-to, and in 1659
    he built there a monastery noted for its Chinese style of
    architecture, now known as O-baku-san. The teachers of the same
    school[FN#103] came one after another from China, and Zen[FN#104]
    peculiar to them, flourished a short while.

    [FN#101] Shi-seki-shu-ran.

    [FN#102] In-gen (1654-1673) came over with Ta-Mei (Dai-bi, died
    1673), Hwui Lin (E-rin died 1681), Tuh Chan (Doku-tan, died 1706),
    and others. For the life of In-gen: see Zoku-ko-shu-den and

    [FN#103] Tsih Fei (Soku-hi died 1671), Muh Ngan (Moku-an died 1684),
    Kao Tsuen (Ko-sen died 1695), the author of Fu-so-zen-rin-so-bo-den,
    To-koku-ko-so-den, and Sen-un-shu, are best known.

    [FN#104] This is a sub-sect of the Rin Zai School, as shown in the
    following table:


    1. Bodhidharma.
    2. Hwui Ko (E-ka).
    3. San Tsang (So-san).
    4. Tao Sin (Do-shin).
    5. Hung Jan (Ko nin).
    6. Shang Siu (Jin-shu).
    6. Hwui Nang (E-no).
    7. Nan Yoh (Nan-gaku).
    ---10. Gi-ku.
    ---11. Lin Tsi (Rin-zai).
    ---21. Yuen Wu (En-go).
    ---22. Fuh Hai (Bukkai).
    ---28. Kaku-a.
    42. In-gen.
    ---25. Hti Ngan (Kyo-an).
    ---26. Ei-sai.
    7. Tsing Yuen (Sei-gen).
    ---8. Shih Teu (Seki-to).
    ---11. Tung Shan (To-zan).
    ---23. Ju Tsing (Nyo-jo).
    ---24. Do-gen.

    The O Baku School is the amalgamation of Zen and the worship of
    Amitabha, and different from the other two schools. The statistics
    for 1911 give the following figures:

    The Number of Temples:

    The So To School 14,255
    The Rin Zai School 6,128
    The O Baku School 546

    The Number of Teachers:

    The So To School 9,576
    The Rin Zai School 4,523
    The O Baku School 349

    It was also in this period that Zen gained a great influence on the
    popular literature characterized by the shortest form of poetical
    composition. This was done through the genius of Ba-sho,[FN#105] a
    great literary man, recluse and traveller, who, as his writings show
    us, made no small progress in the study of Zen. Again, it was made
    use of by the teachers of popular[FN#106] ethics, who did a great
    deal in the education of the lower classes. In this way Zen and its
    peculiar taste gradually found its way into the arts of peace, such
    as literature, fine art, tea-ceremony, cookery, gardening,
    architecture, and at last it has permeated through every fibre of
    Japanese life.

    [FN#105] He (died 1694) learned Zen under a contemporary Zen master
    (Buccho), and is said to have been enlightened before his reformation
    of the popular literature.

    [FN#106] The teaching was called Shin-gaku, or the 'learning of
    mind.' It was first taught by Bai-gan (Ishi-da), and is the
    reconciliation of Shintoism and Buddhism with Confucianism. Bai-gan
    and his successors practised Meditation, and were enlightened in
    their own way. Do-ni (Naka-zawa, died 1803) made use of Zen more
    than any other teacher.

    13. Zen after the Restoration.

    After the Restoration of the Mei-ji (1867) the popularity of Zen
    began to wane, and for some thirty years remained in inactivity; but
    since the Russo-Japanese War its revival has taken place. And now it
    is looked upon as an ideal faith, both for a nation full of hope and
    energy, and for a person who has to fight his own way in the strife
    of life. Bushido, or the code of chivalry, should be observed not
    only by the soldier in the battle-field, but by every citizen in the
    struggle for existence. If a person be a person and not a beast,
    then he must be a Samurai-brave, generous, upright, faithful, and
    manly, full of self-respect and self-confidence, at the same time
    full of the spirit of self-sacrifice. We can find an incarnation of
    Bushido in the late General Nogi, the hero of Port Arthur, who, after
    the sacrifice of his two sons for the country in the Russo-Japanese
    War, gave up his own and his wife's life for the sake of the deceased
    Emperor. He died not in vain, as some might think, because his
    simplicity, uprightness, loyalty, bravery, self-control, and
    self-sacrifice, all combined in his last act, surely inspire the
    rising generation with the spirit of the Samurai to give birth to
    hundreds of Nogis. Now let us see in the following chapters what Zen
    so closely connected with Bushido teaches us.



    1. Scripture is no More than Waste Paper.

    [FN#107] Zen is not based on any particular sutra, either of
    Mahayana or of Hinayana. There are twofold Tripitakas (or the three
    collections of the Buddhist scriptures)-namely, the
    Mahayana-tripitaka and the Hinayana-tripitaka. The former are the
    basis of the Mahayana, or the higher and reformed Buddhism, full of
    profound metaphysical reasonings; while the latter form that of the
    Hinayana, or the lower and early Buddhism, which is simple and
    ethical teaching. These twofold Tripitakas are as follows:


    The Sutra Pitaka.-The Saddharma-pundarika-sutra,
    Samdhi-nirmocana-sutra, Avatamsaka-sutra, Prajnyaparamita-sutra,
    Amitayus-sutra, Mahaparinirvana-sutra, etc.

    The Vinaya Pitaka.--Brahmajala-sutra, Bodhisattva-caryanirdeca, etc.

    The Abhidharma Pitaka.--Mahaprajnyaparamita-sutra,
    Mahayana-craddhotpada-castra, Madhyamaka-castra, Yogacarya
    bhumi-castra, etc.

    The Sutra Pitaka.--Dirghagama, Ekottaragama, Madhyamagama,
    Samyuktagama, etc.

    The Vinaya Pitaka.--Dharmagupta-vinaya, Mahasamghika-vinaya,
    Sarvastivada-vinaya, etc.

    The Abhidharma Pitaka.--Dharma-skandha-pada, Samgiti-paryaya-pada,
    Jnyanaprasthana-castra, Abhidharma-kosa-castra, etc.

    The term 'Tripitaka,' however, was not known at the time of Shakya
    Muni, and almost all of the northern Buddhist records agree in
    stating that the Tripitaka was rehearsed and settled in the same year
    in which the Muni died. Mahavansa also says: "The book called
    Abhidharma-pitaka was compiled, which was preached to god, and was
    arranged in due order by 500 Budhu priests." But we believe that
    Shakya Muni's teaching was known to the early Buddhists, not as
    Tripitaka, but as Vinaya and Dharma, and even at the time of King
    Acoka (who ascended the throne about 269 B.C.) it was not called
    Tripitaka, but Dharma, as we have it in his Edicts. Mahayanists
    unanimously assert the compilation of the Tripitaka in the first
    council of Rajagrha, but they differ in opinion as to the question
    who rehearsed the Abhidharma; notwithstanding, they agree as for the
    other respects, as you see in the following:

    The Sutra Pitaka, compiled by Ananda; the Vinaya Pitaka, compiled by
    Upali; the Abhidharma Pitaka, compiled by Ananda--according to
    Nagarjuna (Mahaprajnyaparamita-castra).

    The Sutra Pitaka, compiled by Ananda; the Vinaya Pitaka, compiled by
    Upali; the Abhidharma Pitaka, compiled by Kacyapa according to Huen
    Tsang (Ta-tan-si-yu-ki).

    The Sutra Pitaka, compiled by Ananda; the Vinaya Pitaka, compiled by
    Upali; the Abhidharma Pitaka, compiled by Purna--according to
    Paramartha ('A Commentary on the History of the Hinayana Schools').

    The above-mentioned discrepancy clearly betrays the uncertainty of
    their assertions, and gives us reason to discredit the compilation of
    Abhidharma Pitaka at the first council. Besides, judging from the
    Dharma-gupta-vinaya and other records, which states that Purna took
    no part in the first council, and that he had different opinions as
    to the application of the rules of discipline from that of Kacyapa,
    there should be some errors in Paramartha's assertion.
    Of these three collections of the Sacred Writings, the first two, or
    Sutra and Vinaya, of Mahayana, as well as of Himayana, are believed
    to be the direct teachings of Shakya Muni himself, because all the
    instructions are put in the mouth of the Master or sanctioned by him.
    The Mahayanists, however, compare the Hinayana doctrine with a
    resting-place on the road for a traveller, while the Mahayana
    doctrine with his destination. All the denominations of Buddhism,
    with a single exception of Zen, are based on the authority of some
    particular sacred writings. The Ten Dai Sect, for instance, is based
    on Saddharma-pundarika-sutra; the Jo Do Sect on Larger
    Sukhavati-vyuha, Smaller Sukhavati-vyuha, and Amitayus-dhyana-sutra;
    the Ke Gon Sect on Avatamsaka-sutra; the Hosso Sect on

    Zen is based on the highest spiritual plane attained by Shakya Muni
    himself. It can only be realized by one who has attained the same
    plane. To describe it in full by means of words is beyond the power
    even of Gotama himself. It is for this reason that the author of
    Lankavatara-sutra insists that Shakya Muni spoke no word through his
    long career of forty-nine years as a religious teacher, and that of
    Mahaprajnyaparamita-sutra[FN#108] also express the same opinion. The
    Scripture is no more nor less than the finger pointing to the moon of
    Buddhahood. When we recognize the moon and enjoy its benign beauty,
    the finger is of no use. As the finger has no brightness whatever,
    so the Scripture has no holiness whatever. The Scripture is
    religious currency representing spiritual wealth. It does not matter
    whether money be gold, or sea-shells, or cows. It is a mere
    substitute. What it stands for is of paramount importance. Away
    with your stone-knife! Do not watch the stake against which a
    running hare once struck its head and died. Do not wait for another
    hare. Another may not come for ever. Do not cut the side of the
    boat out of which you dropped your sword to mark where it sunk. The
    boat is ever moving on. The Canon is the window through which we
    observe the grand scenery of spiritual nature. To hold communion
    directly with it we must get out of the window. It is a mere stray
    fly that is always buzzing within it, struggling to get out. Those
    who spend most of their lives in the study of the Scriptures, arguing
    and explaining with hair-splitting reasonings, and attain no higher
    plane in spirituality, are religious flies good for nothing but their
    buzzing about the nonsensical technicalities. It is on this account
    that Rin-zai declared:[FN#109] 'The twelve divisions of the Buddhist
    Canon are nothing better than waste paper.'

    [FN#108] Mahaprajnyaparamita-sutra, vol. 425.

    [FN#109] Rin-zai-roku.

    2. No Need of the Scriptural Authority for Zen.

    Some Occidental scholars erroneously identify Buddhism with the
    primitive faith of Hinayanism, and are inclined to call Mahayanism, a
    later developed faith, a degenerated one. If the primitive faith be
    called the genuine, as these scholars think, and the later developed
    faith be the degenerated one, then the child should be called the
    genuine man and the grown-up people be the degenerated ones;
    similarly, the primitive society must be the genuine and the modern
    civilization be the degenerated one. So also the earliest writings
    of the Old Testament should be genuine and the four Gospels be
    degenerated. Beyond all doubt Zen belongs to Mahayanism, yet this
    does not imply that it depends on the scriptural authority of that
    school, because it does not trouble itself about the Canon whether it
    be Hinayana or Mahayana, or whether it was directly spoken by Shakya
    Muni or written by some later Buddhists. Zen is completely free from
    the fetters of old dogmas, dead creeds, and conventions of
    stereotyped past, that check the development of a religious faith and
    prevent the discovery of a new truth. Zen needs no Inquisition. It
    never compelled nor will compel the compromise of a Galileo or a
    Descartes. No excommunication of a Spinoza or the burning of a Bruno
    is possible for Zen.

    On a certain occasion Yoh Shan (Yaku-san) did not preach the doctrine
    for a long while, and was requested to give a sermon by his assistant
    teacher, saying: "Would your reverence preach the Dharma to your
    pupils, who long thirst after your merciful instruction?" "Then ring
    the bell," replied Yoh Shan. The bell rang, and all the monks
    assembled in the Hall eager to bear the sermon. Yoh Shan went up to
    the pulpit and descended immediately without saying a word. "You,
    reverend sir," asked the assistant, "promised to deliver a sermon a
    little while ago. Why do you not preach?" "Sutras are taught by the
    Sutra teachers," said the master; "Castras are taught by the Castra
    teachers. No wonder that I say nothing."[FN#110] This little
    episode will show you that Zen is no fixed doctrine embodied in a
    Sutra or a Castra, but a conviction or realization within us.

    [FN#110] Zen-rin-rui-shu and E-gen.

    To quote another example, an officer offered to Tung Shan (To-zan)
    plenty of alms, and requested him to recite the sacred Canon. Tung
    Shan, rising from his chair, made a bow respectfully to the officer,
    who did the same to the teacher. Then Tung Shan went round the
    chair, taking the officer with him, and making a bow again to the
    officer, asked: "Do you see what I mean?" "No, sir," replied the
    other. "I have been reciting the sacred Canon, why do you not
    see?"[FN#111] Thus Zen does not regard Scriptures in black and white
    as its Canon, for it takes to-days and tomorrows of this actual life
    as its inspired pages.

    [FN#111] Zen-rin-rui-sha and To-zan-roku.

    3. The Usual Explanation of the Canon.

    An eminent Chinese Buddhist scholar, well known as Ten Dai Dai Shi
    (A.D. 538-597), arranged the whole preachings of Shakya Muni in a
    chronological order in accordance with his own religious theory, and
    observed that there were the Five Periods in the career of the Buddha
    as a religious teacher. He tried to explain away all the
    discrepancies and contradictions, with which the Sacred Books are
    encumbered, by arranging the Sutras in a line of development. His
    elucidation was so minute and clear, and his metaphysical reasonings
    so acute and captivating, that his opinion was universally accepted
    as an historical truth, not merely by the Chinese, but also by the
    Japanese Mahayanists. We shall briefly state here the so-called Five

    Shakya Muni attained to Buddhaship in his thirtieth year, and sat
    motionless for seven days under the Bodhi tree, absorbed in deep
    meditation, enjoying the first bliss of his Enlightenment. In the
    second week he preached his Dharma to the innumerable multitude of
    Bodhisattvas,[FN#112] celestial beings, and deities in the nine
    assemblies held at seven different places. This is the origin of a
    famous Mahayana book entitled Buddhavatamsaka-mahavaipulya-sutra. In
    this book the Buddha set forth his profound Law just as it was
    discovered by his highly Enlightened mind, without considering the
    mental states of his hearers. Consequently the ordinary hearers (or
    the Buddha's immediate disciples) could not understand the doctrine,
    and sat stupefied as if they were 'deaf and dumb,' while the great
    Bodhisattvas fully understood and realized the doctrine. This is
    called the first period, which lasted only two or three[FN#113] weeks.

    [FN#112] Bodhisattva is an imaginary personage, or ideal saint,
    superior to Arhat, or the highest saint of Hinayanism. The term
    'Bodhisattva' was first applied to the Buddha before his
    Enlightenment, and afterwards was adopted by Mahayanists to mean the
    adherent of Mahayanism in contradistinction with the Cravaka or
    hearers of Hinayanism.

    [FN#113] Bodhiruci says to the effect that the preachings in the
    first five assemblies were made in the first week, and the rest were
    delivered in the second week. Nagarjuna says that the Buddha spoke
    no word for fifty-seven days after his Enlightenment. It is said in
    Saddharma-pundarika-sutra that after three weeks the Buddha preached
    at Varanasi, and it says nothing respecting Avatamsaka-sutra. Though
    there are divers opinions about the Buddha's first sermon and its
    date, all traditions agree in this that he spent some time in
    meditation, and then delivered the first sermon to the five ascetics
    at Varanasi.

    Thereupon Shakya Muni, having discovered that ordinary bearers were
    too ignorant to believe in the Mahayana doctrine and appreciate the
    greatness of Buddhahood, thought it necessary to modify his teaching
    so as to adjust it to the capacity of ordinary people. So he went to
    Varanasi (or Benares) and preached his modified doctrine--that is,
    Hinayanism. The instruction given at that time has been handed down
    to us as the four Agamas,[FN#114] or the four Nikayas. This is
    called the second period, which lasted about twelve years. It was at
    the beginning of this period that the Buddha converted the five
    ascetics,[FN#115] who became his disciples. Most of the Çravakas or
    the adherents of Hinayanism were converted during this period. They
    trained their hearts in accordance with the modified Law, learned the
    four noble truths,[FN#116] and worked out their own salvation.

    [FN#114] (1) Anguttara, (2) Majjhima, (3) Digha, (4) Samyutta.

    [FN#115] Kondanynya, Vappa, Baddiya, Mahanana, Assaji.

    [FN#116] The first is the sacred truth of suffering; the second the
    truth of the origin of suffering--that is, lust and desire; the third
    the sacred truth of the extinction of suffering; the fourth the
    sacred truth of the path that leads to the extinction of suffering.
    There are eight noble paths that lead to the extinction of
    suffering--that is, Right faith, Right resolve, Right speech, Right
    action, Right living, Right effort, Right thought, and Right

    The Buddha then having found his disciples firmly adhering to
    Hinayanism without knowing that it was a modified and imperfect
    doctrine, he had to lead them up to a higher and perfect doctrine
    that he might lead them up to Buddhahood. With this object in view
    Shakya Muni preached Vimalakirtti-nirdeca-sutra[FN#117],
    Lankavatara-sutra, and other sutras, in which he compared Hinayanism
    with Mahayanism, and described the latter in glowing terms as a deep
    and perfect Law, whilst he set forth the former at naught as a
    superficial and imperfect one. Thus he showed his disciples the
    inferiority of Hinayanism, and caused them to desire for Mahayanism.
    This is said to be the third period, which lasted some eight years.

    [FN#117] This is one of the most noted Mahayana books, and is said
    to be the best specimen of the sutras belonging to this period. It
    is in this sutra that most of Shakya's eminent disciples, known as
    the adherents of Hinayanism, are astonished with the profound wisdom,
    the eloquent speech, and the supernatural power of Vimalakirtti, a
    Bodhisattva, and confess the inferiority of their faith. The author
    frequently introduces episodes in order to condemn Hinayanism, making
    use of miracles of his own invention.

    The disciples of the Buddha now understood that Mahayanism was far
    superior to Hinayanism, but they thought the higher doctrine was only
    for Bodhisattvas and beyond their understanding. Therefore they
    still adhered to the modified doctrine, though they did no longer
    decry Mahayanism, which they had no mind to practise. Upon this
    Shakya Muni preached Prajnyaparamita-sutras[FN#118] in the sixteen
    assemblies held at four different places, and taught them Mahayanism
    in detail in order to cause them to believe it and practise it. Thus
    they became aware that there was no definite demarcation between
    Mahayanism and Hinayanism, and that they might become Mahayanists.
    This is the fourth period, which lasted about twenty-two years.
    Now, the Buddha, aged seventy-two, thought it was high time to preach
    his long-cherished doctrine that all sentient beings can attain to
    Supreme Enlightenment; so he preached Saddharma-pundarika-sutra, in
    which he prophesied when and where his disciples should become
    Buddhas. It was his greatest object to cause all sentient beings to
    be Enlightened and enable them to enjoy the bliss of Nirvana. It was
    for this that he had endured great pain and hardships through his
    previous existences. It was for this that he had left his heavenly
    abode to appear on earth. It was for this that he had preached from
    time to time through his long career of forty-seven years. Having
    thus realized his great aim, Shakya Muni had now to prepare for his
    final departure, and preached Mahaparinirvana-sutra in order to show
    that all the animated and inanimate things were endowed with the same
    nature as his. After this last instruction he passed to eternity.
    This is called the fifth period, which lasted some eight years.

    [FN#118] Nagarjuna's doctrine depends mainly on these sutras.

    These five periods above mentioned can scarcely be called historical
    in the proper sense of the term, yet they are ingeniously invented by
    Ten Dai Dai Shi to set the Buddhist Scriptures in the order of
    doctrinal development, and place Saddharma-pundarika in the highest
    rank among the Mahayana books. His argument, however dogmatic and
    anti-historical in no small degree, would be not a little valuable
    for our reader, who wants to know the general phase of the Buddhist
    Canon, consisting of thousands of fascicles.

    4. Sutras used by Zen Masters.

    Ten Dai failed to explain away the discrepancies and contradictions
    of which the Canon is full, and often contradicted himself by the
    ignoring of historical[FN#119] facts.

    [FN#119] Let us state our own opinion on the subject in question.
    The foundation of Hinayanism consists in the four Nikayas, or four
    Agamas, the most important books of that school. Besides the four
    Agamas, there exist in the Chinese Tripitaka numerous books
    translated by various authors, some of which are extracts from
    Agamas, and some the lives of the Buddha, while others are entirely
    different sutras, apparently of later date. Judging from these
    sources, it seems to us that most of Shakya Muni's original teachings
    are embodied into the four Agamas. But it is still a matter of
    uncertainty that whether they are stated in Agamas now extant just as
    they were, for the Buddha's preachings were rehearsed immediately
    after the Buddha's death in the first council held at Rajagrha, yet
    not consigned to writing. They were handed down by memory about one
    hundred years. Then the monks at Vaisali committed the so-called Ten
    Indulgences, infringing the rules of the Order, and maintained that
    Shakya Muni had not condemned them in his preachings. As there were,
    however, no written sutras to disprove their assertion, the elders,
    such as Yaca, Revata, and others, who opposed the Indulgences, had to
    convoke the second council of 700 monks, in which they succeeded in
    getting the Indulgences condemned, and rehearsed the Buddha's
    instruction for the second time. Even in this council of Vaisali we
    cannot find the fact that the Master's preachings were reduced to
    writing. The decisions of the 700 elders were not accepted by the
    party of opposition, who held a separate council, and settled their
    own rules and doctrine. Thus the same doctrine of the Teacher began
    to be differently stated and believed.

    This being the first open schism, one disruption after another took
    place among the Buddhistic Order. There were many different schools
    of the Buddhists at the time when King Acoka ascended the throne
    (about 269 B.C.), and the patronage of the King drew a great number
    of pagan ascetics into the Order, who, though they dressed themselves
    in the yellow robes, yet still preserved their religious views in
    their original colour. This naturally led the Church into continual
    disturbances and moral corruption. In the eighteenth year of Acoka's
    reign the King summoned the council of 1,000 monks at Pataliputra
    (Patna), and settled the orthodox doctrine in order to keep the
    Dharma pure from heretical beliefs. We believe that about this time
    some of the Buddha's preachings were reduced to writing, for the
    missionaries despatched by the King in the year following the council
    seem to have set out with written sutras. In addition to this, some
    of the names of the passages of the Dharma are given in the Bharbra
    edict of the King, which was addressed to the monks in Magadha. We
    do not suppose, however, that all the sutras were written at once in
    these days, but that they were copied down from memory one after
    another at different times, because some of the sutras were put down
    in Ceylon 160 years after the Council of Patna.

    In the introductory book of Ekottaragama (Anguttara Nikaya), now
    extant in the Chinese Tripitaka, we notice the following points: (1)
    It is written in a style quite different from that of the original
    Agama, but similar to that of the supplementary books of the Mahayana
    sutras; (2) it states Ananda's compilation of the Tripitaka after the
    death of the Master; (3) it refers to the past Buddhas, the future
    Buddha Maitreya, and innumerable Bodhisattvas; (4) it praises the
    profound doctrine of Mahayanism. From this we infer that the Agama
    was put in the present form after the rise of the Mahayana School,
    and handed down through the hand of Mahasanghika scholars, who were
    much in sympathy with Mahayanism.

    Again, the first book of Dirghagama, (Digha Nikaya), that describes
    the line of Buddhas who appeared before Shakya Muni, adopts the whole
    legend of Gotama's life as a common mode of all Buddhas appearing on
    earth; while the second book narrates the death of Gotama and the
    distribution of his relies, and refers to Pataliputra, the new
    capital of Acoka. This shows us that the present Agama is not of an
    earlier date than the third century B.C. Samyuktagama (Samyutta
    Nikaya) also gives a detailed account of Acoka's conversion, and of
    his father Bindusara. From these evidences we may safely infer that
    the Hinayana sutras were put in the present shape at different times
    between the third century B.C. and the first century A.D.
    With regard to the Mahayana sutras we have little doubt about their
    being the writings of the later Buddhist reformers, even if they are
    put in the mouth of Shakya Muni. They are entirely different from
    the sutras of Hinayanism, and cannot be taken as the preachings of
    one and the same person. The reader should notice the following

    (1) Four councils were held for the rehearsal of the Tripitaka
    namely, the first at Rajagrha, in the year of Shakya Muni's death;
    the second at Vaisali, some 100 years after the Buddha; the third at
    the time of King Acoka, about 235 years after the Master; the fourth
    at the time of King Kanishka, the first century A.D. But all these
    councils were held to compile the Hinayana sutras, and nothing is
    known of the rehearsal of the Mahayana books. Some are of opinion
    that the first council was held within the Sattapanni cave, near
    Rajagrha, where the Hinayana Tripitaka was rehearsed by 500 monks,
    while outside the cave there assembled a greater number of monks, who
    were not admitted into the cave, and rehearsed the Mahayana
    Tripitaka. This opinion, however, is based on no reliable source.

    (2) The Indian orthodox Buddhists of old declared that the Mahayana
    sutras were the fabrication of heretics or of the Evil One, and not
    the teachings of the Buddha. In reply to this, the Mahayanists had
    to prove that the Mahayana sutras were compiled by the direct
    disciples of the Master; but even Nagarjuna could not vindicate the
    compilation of the doubtful books, and said (in
    Mahaprajnyaparamita-castra) that they were compiled by Ananda and
    Manjucri, with myriads of Bodhisattvas at the outside of the Iron
    Mountain Range, which encloses the earth. Asanga also proved (in
    Mahayanalankara-sutra-castra) with little success that Mahayanism was
    the Buddha's direct teachings. Some may quote
    Bodhisattva-garbhastha-sutra in favour of the Mahayana; but it is of
    no avail, as the sutra itself is the work of a later date.

    (3) Although almost all of the Mahayana sutras, excepting
    Avatamsaka-sutra, treat of Hinayanism as the imperfect doctrine
    taught in the first part of the Master's career, yet not merely the
    whole life of Gotama, but also events which occurred after his death
    are narrated in the Hinayana sutras. This shows that the Mahayana
    sutras were composed after the establishment of early Buddhism.

    (4) The narratives given in the Hinayana sutras in reference to
    Shakya Muni seem to be based on historical facts, but those in the
    Mahayana books are full of wonders and extravagant miracles far from

    (5) The Hinayana sutras retain the traces of their having been
    classified and compiled as we see in Ekottaragama, while Mahayana
    books appear to have been composed one after another by different
    authors at different times, because each of them strives to excel
    others, declaring itself to be the sutra of the highest doctrine, as
    we see in Saddharma-pundarika, Samdhinirmocana,
    Suvarnaprabhasottamaraja, etc.

    (6) The dialogues in the Hinayana sutras are in general those between
    the Buddha and his disciples, while in the Mahayana books imaginary
    beings called Bodhisattvas take the place of disciples. Moreover, in
    some books no monks are mentioned.

    (7) Most of the Mahayana sutras declare that they themselves possess
    those mystic powers that protect the reader or the owner from such
    evils as epidemic, famine, war, etc.; but the Hinayana sutras are
    pure from such beliefs.

    (8) The Mahayana sutras extol not only the merits of the reading, but
    the copying of the sutras. This unfailingly shows the fact that they
    were not handed down by memory, as the Hinayana sutras, but written
    by their respective authors.

    (9) The Hinayana sutras were written with a plain style in Pali,
    while the Mahayana books, with brilliant phraseology, in Sanskrit.

    (10) The Buddha in the Hinayana sutras is little more than a human
    being, while Buddha or Tathagata in the Mahayana is a superhuman
    being or Great Deity.

    (11) The moral precepts of the Hinayana were laid down by the Master
    every time when his disciples acted indecently, while those of the
    Mahayana books were spoken all at once by Tathagata.

    (12) Some Mahayana sutras appear to be the exaggeration or
    modification of what was stated in the Hinayana books, as we see in

    (13) If we take both the Hinayana and the Mahayana as spoken by one
    and the same person, we cannot understand why there are so many
    contradictory statements, as we see in the following:

    (a) Historical Contradictions.--For instance, Hinayana sutras are
    held to be the first sermon of the Buddha by the author of
    Saddharma-pundarika, while Avatamsaka declares itself to be the first
    sermon. Nagarjuna holds that Prajnya sutras are the first.

    (b) Contradictions as to the Person of the Master.--For instance,
    Agamas say the Buddha's body was marked with thirty-two
    peculiarities, while the Mahayana books enumerate ninety-seven
    peculiarities, or even innumerable marks.

    (c) Doctrinal Contradictions.--For instance, the Hinayana sutras put
    forth the pessimistic, nihilistic view of life, while the Mahayana
    books, as a rule, express the optimistic, idealistic view.

    (14) The Hinayana sutras say nothing of the Mahayana books, while the
    latter always compare their doctrine with that of the former, and
    speak of it in contempt. It is clear that the name 'Hinayana' was
    coined by the Mahayanists, as there is no sutra which calls itself
    'Hinayana.' It is therefore evident that when the Hinayana books
    took the present shape there appeared no Mahayana sutras.

    (15) The authors of the Mahayana sutras should have expected the
    opposition of the Hinayanists, because they say not seldom that there
    might be some who would not believe in and oppose Mahayanism as not
    being the Buddha's teaching, but that of the Evil One. They say also
    that one who would venture to say the Mahayana books are fictitious
    should fall into Hell. For example, the author of
    Mahaparinirvana-sutra says: "Wicked Bhiksus would say all Vaipulya
    Mahayana sutras are not spoken by the Buddha, but by the Evil One."

    (16) There are evidences showing that the Mahayana doctrine was
    developed out of the Hinayana one.

    (a) The Mahayanists' grand conception of Tathagata is the natural
    development of that of those progressive Hinayanists who belonged to
    the Mahasamghika School, which was formed some one hundred years
    after the Master. These Hinayanists maintained that the Buddha had
    infinite power, endless life, and limitlessly great body. The author
    of Mahaparinirvana-sutra also says that Buddha is immortal, his
    Dharma-kaya is infinite and eternal. The authors of
    Mahayana-mulagata-hrdayabhumi-dhyana-sutra and of
    Suvarnaprabha-sottamaraja-sutra enumerate the Three Bodies of Buddha,
    while the writer of Lankavatara-sutra describes the Four Bodies, and
    that of Avatamsaka-sutra the Ten Bodies of Tathagata.

    (b) According to the Hinayana sutras, there are only four stages of
    saintship, but the Mahasamghika School increases the number and gives
    ten steps. Some Mahayana sutras also enumerate the ten stages of
    Bodhisattva, while others give forty-one or fifty two stages.

    (c) The Himayana sutras name six past Buddhas and one future Buddha
    Maitreya, while the Mahayana sutras name thirty-five, fifty-three, or
    three thousand Buddhas.

    (d) The Hinayana sutras give the names of six Vijnyanas, while the
    Mahayana books seven, eight, or nine Vijnyanas.

    (17) For a few centuries after the Buddha we hear only of Hinayanism,
    but not of Mahayanism, there being no Mahayana teacher.

    (18) In some Mahayana sutras (Mahavairocanabhisambodhi-sutra, for
    example) Tathagata Vairocana takes the place of Gotama, and nothing
    is said of the latter.

    (19) The contents of the Mahayana sutras often prove that they were,
    composed, or rewritten, or some additions were made, long after the
    Buddha. For instance, Mahamaya-sutra says that Acvaghosa would
    refute heretical doctrines 600 years after the Master, and Nagarjuna
    would advocate the Dharma 700 years after Gotama, while
    Lankavatara-sutra prophesies that Nagarjuna would appear in South

    (20) The author of San-ron-gen-gi tells us Mahadeva, a leader of the
    Mahasamghika School, used Mahayana sutras, together with the orthodox
    Tripitaka 116 after the Buddha. It is, however, doubtful that they
    existed at so early a date.

    (21) Mahaprajnyaparamita-castra, ascribed to Nagarjuna, refers to
    many Mahayana books, which include Saddharma-pundarika,
    Vimalakirtti-nirdeca, Sukhavati-vyuha, Mahaprajnyaparamita,
    Pratyutpanna-buddhasammukhavasthita-samadhi, etc. He quotes in his
    Dacabhumivibhasa-castra, Mahaparinirvana, Dacabhumi, etc.

    (22) Sthiramati, whose date is said to be earlier than Nagarjuna and
    later than Acvaghosa, tries to prove that Mahayanism was directly
    taught by the Master in his Mahayanavataraka-castra. And
    Mahayanottaratantra-castra, which is ascribed by some scholars to
    him, refers to Avatamsaka, Vajracchedikka-prajnyaparamita,
    Saddharmapundarika, Crimala-devi-simhananda, etc.

    (23) Chi-leu-cia-chin, who came to China in A.D. 147 or A.D. 164,
    translated some part of Mahayana books known as Maharatnakuta-sutra
    and Mahavaipulya-mahasannipata-sutra.

    (24) An-shi-kao, who came to China in A.D. 148, translated such
    Mahayana books as Sukhavati-vyaha, Candra-dipa-samadhi, etc.

    (25) Matanga, who came to China in A.D. 67, is said by his biographer
    to have been informed of both Mahayanism and Hinayanism to have given
    interpretations to a noted Mahayana book, entitled Suvarnaprabhasa.

    (26) Sandhinirmocana-sutra is supposed to be a work of Asanga not
    without reason, because Asanga's doctrine is identical with that of
    the sutra, and the sutra itself is contained in the latter part of
    Yogacaryabhumi-castra. The author divides the whole preachings of
    the Master into the three periods that he might place the Idealistic
    doctrine in the highest rank of the Mahayana schools.

    (27) We have every reason to believe that Mahayana sutras began to
    appear (perhaps Prajnya sutras being the first) early in the first
    century A.D., that most of the important books appeared before
    Nagarjuna, and that some of Mantra sutras were composed so late as
    the time of Vajrabodhi, who came to China in A.D. 719.

    To say nothing of the strong opposition raised by the Japanese
    scholars,[FN#120] such an assumption can be met with an assumption of
    entirely opposite nature, and the difficulties can never be overcome.
    For Zen masters, therefore, these assumptions and reasonings are
    mere quibbles unworthy of their attention.

    [FN#120] The foremost of them was Chuki Tominaga (1744), of whose
    life little is known. He is said to have been a nameless merchant at
    Osaka. His Shutsu-jo-ko-go is the first great work of higher
    criticism on the Buddhist Scriptures.

    To believe blindly in the Scriptures is one thing, and to be pious is
    another. How often the childish views of Creation and of God in the
    Scriptures concealed the light of scientific truths; how often the
    blind believers of them fettered the progress of civilization; how
    often religious men prevented us from the realizing of a new truth,
    simply because it is against the ancient folk-lore in the Bible.
    Nothing is more absurd than the constant dread in which religious
    men, declaring to worship God in truth and in spirit, are kept at the
    scientific discovery of new facts incompatible with the folk-lore.
    Nothing is more irreligious than to persecute the seekers of truth in
    order to keep up absurdities and superstitions of bygone ages.
    Nothing is more inhuman than the commission of 'devout cruelty' under
    the mask of love of God and man. Is it not the misfortune, not only
    of Christianity, but of whole mankind, to have the Bible encumbered
    with legendary histories, stories of miracles, and a crude cosmology,
    which from time to time come in conflict with science?

    The Buddhist Scriptures are also overloaded with Indian superstitions
    and a crude cosmology, which pass under the name of Buddhism.
    Accordingly, Buddhist scholars have confused not seldom the doctrine
    of the Buddha with these absurdities, and thought it impious to
    abandon them. Kaiseki,[FN#121] for instance, was at a loss to
    distinguish Buddhism from the Indian astronomy, which is utterly
    untenable in the face of the fact. He taxed his reason to the utmost
    to demonstrate the Indian theory and at the same time to refute the
    Copernican theory. One day he called on Yeki-do[FN#122] a
    contemporary Zen master, and explained the construction of the Three
    Worlds as described in the Scriptures, saying that Buddhism would
    come to naught if the theory of the Three Worlds be overthrown by the
    Copernican. Then Yeki-do exclaimed: "Buddhism aims to destroy the
    Three Worlds and to establish Buddha's Holy Kingdom throughout the
    universe. Why do you waste your energy in the construction of the
    Three Worlds?"[FN#123]

    [FN#121] A learned Japanese Buddhist scholar, who died in 1882.

    [FN#122] A famous Zen master, the abbot of the So-ji-ji Monastery,
    who died in 1879.

    [FN#123] Kin-sei-zen-rin-gen-ko-roku.

    In this way Zen does not trouble itself about unessentials of the
    Scriptures, on which it never depends for its authority. Do-gen, the
    founder of the Japanese So To Sect, severely condemns (in his
    Sho-bo-gen-zo) the notions of the impurity of women inculcated in the
    Scriptures. He openly attacks those Chinese monks who swore that
    they would not see any woman, and ridicules those who laid down rules
    prohibiting women from getting access to monasteries. A Zen master
    was asked by a Samurai whether there was hell in sooth as taught in
    the Scriptures. "I must ask you," replied he, "before I give you an
    answer. For what purpose is your question? What business have you,
    a Samurai, with a thing of that sort? Why do you bother yourself
    about such an idle question? Surely you neglect your duty and are
    engaged in such a fruitless research. Does this not amount to your
    stealing the annual salary from your lord?" The Samurai, offended
    not a little with these rebukes, stared at the master, ready to draw
    his sword at another insult. Then the teacher said smilingly: "Now
    you are in Hell. Don't you see?"

    Does, then, Zen use no scripture? To this question we answer both
    affirmatively and negatively: negatively, because Zen regards all
    sutras as a sort of pictured food which has no power of appeasing
    spiritual hunger; affirmatively, because it freely makes use of them
    irrespective of Mahayana or Hinayana. Zen would not make a bonfire
    of the Scriptures as Caliph Omar did of the Alexandrian library. A
    Zen master, having seen a Confucianist burning his books on the
    thought that they were rather a hindrance to his spiritual growth,
    observed: "You had better burn your books in mind and heart, but not
    the books in black and white."[FN#124]

    [FN#124] Ukiyo-soshi.

    As even deadly poison proves to be medicine in the band of a good
    doctor, so a heterodox doctrine antagonistic to Buddhism is used by
    the Zen teachers as a finger pointing to the principle of Zen. But
    they as a rule resorted to Lankavatara-sutra,[FN#125]
    sattvacarya-surangama-sutra,[FN#129] Mahapari-nirvana-sutra,[FN#130]
    Saddharma-pundarika-sutra, Avatamsaka-sutra, and so forth.

    [FN#125] This book is the nearest approach to the doctrine of Zen,
    and is said to have been pointed out by Bodhidharma as the best book
    for the use of his followers. See Nanjo's Catalogue, Nos. 175, 1761

    [FN#126] The author of the sutra insists on the unreality of all
    things. The book was first used by the Fifth Patriarch, as we have
    seen in the first chapter. See Nanjo's Catalogue, Nos. 10, 11, 12,
    13, 14, 15.

    [FN#127] The sutra agrees with Zen in many respects, especially in
    its maintaining that the highest truth can only be realized in mind,
    and cannot be expressed by word of mouth. See Nanjo's Catalogue,
    Nos. 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149.

    [FN#128] The sutra was translated into Chinese by Buddhatrata in the
    seventh century. The author treats at length of Samadhi, and sets
    forth a doctrine similar to Zen, so that the text was used by many
    Chinese Zenists. See Nanjo's Catalogue, Nos. 427 and 1629.

    [FN#129] The sutra was translated into Chinese by Paramiti and
    Mikacakya, of the Tang dynasty (618-907). The author conceives
    Reality as Mind or Spirit. The book belongs to the Mantra class,
    although it is much used by Zenists. See Nanjo's Catalogue, No. 446.

    [FN#130] The author of the book sets forth his own conception of
    Nirvana and of Buddha, and maintains that all beings are endowed with
    Buddha-nature. He also gives in detail an incredible account about
    Gotama's death.

    5. A Sutra Equal in Size to the Whole World.

    The holy writ that Zen masters admire is not one of parchment nor of
    palm-leaves, nor in black and white, but one written in heart and
    mind. On one occasion a King of Eastern India invited the venerable
    Prajnyatara, the teacher of Bodhidharma, and his disciples to dinner
    at his own palace.

    Finding all the monks reciting the sacred sutras with the single
    exception of the master, the Ring questioned Prajnyatara: "Why do you
    not, reverend sir, recite the Scriptures as others do?" "My poor
    self, your majesty," replied he, "does not go out to the objects of
    sense in my expiration nor is it confined within body and mind in my
    inspiration. Thus I constantly recite hundreds, thousands, and
    millions of sacred sutras." In like manner the Emperor Wu, of the
    Liang dynasty, once requested Chwen Hih (Fu Dai-shi) to give a
    lecture on the Scriptures. Chwen went upon the platform, struck the
    desk with a block of wood, and came down. Pao Chi (Ho-shi), a
    Buddhist tutor to the Emperor, asked the perplexed monarch: "Does
    your Lordship understand him?" "No," answered His Majesty. "The
    lecture of the Great Teacher is over." As it is clear to you from
    these examples, Zen holds that the faith must be based not on the
    dead Scriptures, but on living facts, that one must turn over not the
    gilt pages of the holy writ, but read between the lines in the holy
    pages of daily life, that Buddha must be prayed not by word of mouth,
    but by actual deed and work, and that one must split open, as the
    author of Avatamsaka-sutra allegorically tells us, the smallest grain
    of dirt to find therein a sutra equal in size to the whole world.
    "The so-called sutra," says Do-gen, "covers the whole universe. It
    transcends time and space. It is written with the characters of
    heaven, of man, of beasts, of Asuras,[FN#13l] of hundreds of grass,
    and of thousands of trees. There are characters, some long, some
    short, some round, some square, some blue, some red, some yellow, and
    some white-in short, all the phenomena in the universe are the
    characters with which the sutra is written." Shakya Muni read that
    sutra through the bright star illuminating the broad expanse of the
    morning skies, when he sat in meditation under the Bodhi Tree.

    [FN#13l] The name of a demon.

    Ling Yun (Rei-un) read it through the lovely flowers of a peach-tree
    in spring after some twenty years of his research for Light, and said:

    "A score of years I looked for Light:
    There came and went many a spring and fall.
    E'er since the peach blossoms came in my sight,
    I never doubt anything at all."

    Hian Yen (Kyo-gen) read it through the noise of bamboo, at which he
    threw pebbles. Su Shih (So-shoku) read it through a waterfall, one
    evening, and said:

    "The brook speaks forth the Tathagata's words divine,
    The hills reveal His glorious forms that shine."

    6. Great Men and Nature.

    All great men, whether they be poets or scientists or religious men
    or philosophers, are not mere readers of books, but the perusers of
    Nature. Men of erudition are often lexicons in flesh and blood, but
    men of genius read between the lines in the pages of life. Kant, a
    man of no great erudition, could accomplish in the theory of
    knowledge what Copernicus did in astronomy. Newton found the law of
    gravitation not in a written page, but in a falling apple.
    Unlettered Jesus realized truth beyond the comprehension of many
    learned doctors. Charles Darwin, whose theory changed the whole
    current of the world's thought, was not a great reader of books, but
    a careful observer of facts. Shakespeare, the greatest of poets, was
    the greatest reader of Nature and life. He could hear the music even
    of heavenly bodies, and said:

    "There's not the smallest orb which thou beholdest,
    But in his motion like an angel sings."

    Chwang Tsz (So-shi), the greatest of Chinese philosophers, says:
    "Thou knowest the music of men, but not the music of the earth. Thou
    knowest the music of the earth, but not the music of the
    heaven."[FN#132] Goethe, perceiving a profound meaning in Nature,
    says: "Flowers are the beautiful hieroglyphics of Nature with which
    she indicates how much she loves us."

    [FN#132] Chwang Tsz, vol. i., p. 10.

    Son-toku[FN#133] (Ninomiya), a great economist, who, overcoming all
    difficulties and hardships by which he was beset from his childhood,
    educated himself, says: "The earth and the heaven utter no word, but
    they ceaselessly repeat the holy book unwritten."

    [FN#133] One of the greatest self-made men in Japan, who lived

    7. The Absolute and Reality are but an Abstraction.

    A grain of sand you, trample upon has a deeper significance than a
    series of lectures by your verbal philosopher whom you respect. It
    contains within itself the whole history of the earth; it tells you
    what it has seen since the dawn of time; while your philosopher
    simply plays on abstract terms and empty words. What does his
    Absolute, or One, or Substance mean? What does his Reality or Truth
    imply? Do they denote or connote anything? Mere name! mere
    abstraction! One school of philosophy after another has been
    established on logical subtleties; thousands of books have been
    written on these grand names and fair mirages, which vanish the
    moment that your hand of experience reaches after them.

    "Duke Hwan," says Chwang Tsz,[FN#134] "seated above in his hall, was"
    (once) reading a book, and a wheelwright, Phien, was making a wheel
    below it. Laying aside his hammer and chisel, Phien went up the
    steps and said: 'I venture to ask your Grace what words you are
    reading?' The duke said: 'The words of sages.' 'Are these sages
    alive?' Phien continued. 'They are dead,' was the reply. 'Then,'
    said the other, 'what you, my Ruler, are reading is only the dregs
    and sediments of those old men.' The duke said:

    [FN#134] Chwang Tsz, vol. ii., p. 24.

    'How should you, a wheelwright, have anything to say about the book
    which I am reading? If you can explain yourself, very well; if you
    cannot, you shall die.' The wheelwright said: 'Your servant will
    look at the thing from the point of view of his own art. In making a
    wheel, if I proceed gently, that is pleasant enough, but the
    workmanship is not strong; if I proceed violently, that is toilsome
    and the joinings do not fit. If the movements of my hand are neither
    (too) gentle nor (too) violent, the idea in my mind is realized. But
    I cannot tell (how to do this) by word of mouth; there is a knack in
    it. I cannot teach the knack to my son, nor can my son learn it from
    me. Thus it is that I am in my seventieth year, and am (still)
    making wheels in my old age. But these ancients, and what it was not
    possible for them to convey, are dead and gone. So then what you, my
    Ruler, are reading is but their dregs and sediments." Zen has no
    business with the dregs and sediments of sages of yore.

    8. The Sermon of the Inanimate.

    The Scripture of Zen is written with facts simple and familiar, so
    simple and familiar with everyday life that they escape observation
    on that very account. The sun rises in the east. The moon sets in
    the west. High is the mountain. Deep is the sea. Spring comes with
    flowers; summer with the cool breeze; autumn with the bright moon;
    winter with the fakes of snow. These things, perhaps too simple and
    too familiar for ordinary observers to pay attention to, have had
    profound significance for Zen. Li Ngao (Ri-ko) one day asked Yoh
    Shan (Yaku-san): "What is the way to truth?" Yoh Shan, pointing to
    the sky and then to the pitcher beside him, said: "You see?" "No,
    sir," replied Li Ngao. "The cloud is in the sky," said Yoh Shan,
    "and the water in the pitcher." Huen Sha (Gen-sha) one day went upon
    the platform and was ready to deliver a sermon when he heard a
    swallow singing. "Listen," said he, "that small bird preaches the
    essential doctrine and proclaims the eternal truth." Then he went
    back to his room, giving no sermon.[FN#135]

    [FN#135] Den-to-roku and E-gen.

    The letters of the alphabet, a, b, c, etc., have no meaning whatever.
    They are but artificial signs, but when spelt they can express any
    great idea that great thinkers may form. Trees, grass, mountains,
    rivers, stars, moons, suns. These are the alphabets with which the
    Zen Scripture is written. Even a, b, c, etc., when spelt, can
    express any great idea. Why not, then, these trees, grass, etc., the
    alphabets of Nature when they compose the Volume of the Universe?
    Even the meanest clod of earth proclaims the sacred law.

    Hwui Chung[FN#136] (E-chu) is said first to have given an expression
    to the Sermon of the Inanimate. "Do the inanimate preach the
    Doctrine?" asked a monk of Hwui Chung on one occasion. "Yes, they
    preach eloquently and incessantly. There is no pause in their
    orations," was the reply. "Why, then, do I not hear them?" asked the
    other again. "Even if you do not, there are many others who can hear
    them." "Who can hear them?" "All the sages hear and understand
    them," said Hwui Chung. Thus the Sermon of the Inanimate had been a
    favourite topic of discussion 900 years before Shakespeare who
    expressed the similar idea, saying:

    "And this our life, exempt from public haunt,
    Finds tongues in trees, books in the running brooks,
    Sermons in stones, and good in everything."

    [FN#136] A direct disciple of the Sixth Patriarch.

    "How wonderful is the Sermon of the Inanimate," says Tung Shan
    (To-zan). "You cannot hear it through your ears, but you can hear it
    through your eyes." You should hear it through your mind's eyes,
    through your heart's eyes, through your inmost soul's eyes, not
    through your intellect, not through your perception, not through your
    knowledge, not through your logic, not through your metaphysics. To
    understand it you have to divine, not to define; you have to observe,
    not to calculate; you have to sympathize, not to analyze; you have to
    see through, not to criticize; you have not to explain, but to feel;
    you have not to abstract, but to grasp; you have to see all in each,
    but not to know all in all; you have to get directly at the soul of
    things, penetrating their hard crust of matter by your rays of the
    innermost consciousness. "The falling leaves as well as the blooming
    flowers reveal to us the holy law of Buddha," says a Japanese Zenist.

    Ye who seek for purity and peace, go to Nature. She will give you
    more than ye ask. Ye who long for strength and perseverance, go to
    Nature. She will train and strengthen you. Ye who aspire after an
    ideal, go to Nature. She will help you in its realization. Ye who
    yearn after Enlightenment, go to Nature. She will never fail to
    grant your request.



    1. The Ancient Buddhist Pantheon.

    The ancient Buddhist pantheon was full of deities or Buddhas,
    3,000[FN#137] in number, or rather countless, and also of
    Bodhisattvas no less than Buddhas. Nowadays, however, in every
    church of Mahayanism one Buddha or another together with some
    Bodhisattvas reigns supreme as the sole object of worship, while
    other supernatural beings sink in oblivion. These Enlightened
    Beings, regardless of their positions in the pantheon, were generally
    regarded as persons who in their past lives cultivated virtues,
    underwent austerities, and various sorts of penance, and at length
    attained to a complete Enlightenment, by virtue of which they secured
    not only peace and eternal bliss, but acquired divers supernatural
    powers, such as clairvoyance, clairaudience, all-knowledge, and what
    not. Therefore, it is natural that some Mahayanists[FN#138] came to
    believe that, if they should go through the same course of discipline
    and study, they could attain to the same Enlightenment and Bliss, or
    the same Buddhahood, while other Mahayanists[FN#139] came to believe
    in the doctrine that the believer is saved and led up to the eternal
    state of bliss, without undergoing these hard disciplines, by the
    power of a Buddha known as having boundless mercy and fathomless
    wisdom whom he invokes.

    [FN#137] Trikalpa-trisahasra-buddhanrama-sutra gives the names of
    3,000 Buddhas, and Buddhabhisita-buddhanama-sutra enumerates Buddhas
    and Bodhisattvas 11,093 in number. See Nanjo's Catalogue, Nos. 404,
    405, 406, 407.

    [FN#138] Those who believe in the doctrine of Holy Path. See 'A
    History of the Twelve Japanese Buddhist Sects,' pp. 109-111.

    [FN#139] Those who believe in the doctrine of the Pure Land.

    2. Zen is Iconoclastic.

    For the followers of Bodhidharma, however, this conception of Buddha
    seemed too crude to be accepted unhesitatingly and the doctrine too
    much irrelevant with and uncongenial to actual life. Since Zen
    denounced, as we have seen in the previous chapter, the scriptural
    authority, it is quite reasonable to have given up this view of
    Buddha inculcated in the Mahayana sutras, and to set at naught those
    statues and images of supernatural beings kept in veneration by the
    orthodox Buddhists. Tan Hia (Tan-ka), a noted Chinese Zen master,
    was found warming himself on a cold morning by the fire made of a
    wooden statue of Buddha. On another occasion he was found mounting
    astride the statue of a saint. Chao Chen (Jo-shu) one day happened
    to find Wang Yuen (Bun-yen) worshipping the Buddha in the temple, and
    forthwith struck him with his staff. "Is there not anything good in
    the worshipping of the Buddha?" protested Wang Yuen. Then the master
    said: "Nothing is better than anything good."[FN#140] These examples
    fully illustrate Zen's attitude towards the objects of Buddhist
    worship. Zen is not, nevertheless, iconoclastic in the commonly
    accepted sense of the term, nor is it idolatrous, as Christian
    missionaries are apt to suppose.

    [FN#140] Zen-rin-rui-shu.

    Zen is more iconoclastic than any of the Christian or the Mohammedan
    denominations in the sense that it opposes the acceptance of the
    petrified idea of Deity, so conventional and formal that it carries
    no inner conviction of the believers. Faith dies out whenever one
    comes to stick to one's fixed and immutable idea of Deity, and to
    deceive oneself, taking bigotry for genuine faith. Faith must be
    living and growing, and the living and growing faith should assume no
    fixed form. It might seem for a superficial observer to take a fixed
    form, as a running river appears constant, though it goes through
    ceaseless changes. The dead faith, immutable and conventional, makes
    its embracer appear religious and respectable, while it arrests his
    spiritual growth. It might give its owner comfort and pride, yet it
    at bottom proves to be fetters to his moral uplifting. It is on this
    account that Zen declares: "Buddha is nothing but spiritual chain or
    moral fetters," and, "If you remember even a name of Buddha, it would
    deprive you of purity of heart." The conventional or orthodox idea
    of Buddha or Deity might seem smooth and fair, like a gold chain,
    being polished and hammered through generations by religious
    goldsmiths; but it has too much fixity and frigidity to be worn by us.

    "Strike off thy fetters, bonds that bind thee down
    Of shining gold or darker, baser ore;

    Know slave is slave caressed or whipped, not free;
    For fetters tho' of gold, are not less strong to bind."

    --The Song of the Sannyasin.

    3. Buddha is Unnamable.

    Give a definite name to Deity, He would be no more than what the name
    implies. The Deity under the name of Brahman necessarily differs
    from the Being under the appellation of Jehovah, just as the Hindu
    differs from the Jew. In like manner the Being designated by God
    necessarily differs from One named Amitabha or from Him entitled
    Allah. To give a name to the Deity is to give Him tradition,
    nationality, limitation, and fixity, and it never brings us nearer to
    Him. Zen's object of worship cannot be named and determined as God,
    or Brahman, or Amitabha, or Creator, or Nature, or Reality, or
    Substance, or the like. Neither Chinese nor Japanese masters of Zen
    tried to give a definite name to their object of adoration. They now
    called Him That One, now This One, now Mind, now Buddha, now
    Tathagata, now Certain Thing, now the True, now Dharma-nature, now
    Buddha-nature, and so forth. Tung Shan[FN#141] (To-zan) on a certain
    occasion declared it to be "A Certain Thing that pillars heaven above
    and supports the earth below; dark as lacquer and undefinable;
    manifesting itself through its activities, yet not wholly comprisable
    within them." So-kei[FN#142] expressed it in the same wise: "There
    exists a Certain Thing, bright as a mirror, spiritual as a mind, not
    subjected to growth nor to decay." Huen Sha (Gen-sha) comparing it
    with a gem says: "There exists a bright gem illuminating through the
    worlds in ten directions by its light."[FN#143]

    [FN#141] Tung Shan Luh (To-zan-roku, 'Sayings and Doings of Ta-zan')
    is one of the best Zen books.

    [FN#142] So-kei, a Korean Zenist, whose work entitled Zen-ke-ki-kwan
    is worthy of our note as a representation of Korean Zen.

    [FN#143] Sho-bo-gen-zo.

    This certain thing or being is too sublime to be named after a
    traditional or a national deity, too spiritual to be symbolized by
    human art, too full of life to be formulated in terms of mechanical
    science, too free to be rationalized by intellectual philosophy, too
    universal to be perceived by bodily senses; but everybody can feel
    its irresistible power, see its invisible presence, and touch its
    heart and soul within himself. "This mysterious Mind," says Kwei
    Fung (Kei-ho), "is higher than the highest, deeper than the deepest,
    limitless in all directions. There is no centre in it. No
    distinction of east and west, and above and below. Is it empty?
    Yes, but not empty like space. Has it a form? Yes, but has no form
    dependent on another for its existence. Is it intelligent? Yes, but
    not intelligent like your mind. Is it non-intelligent? Yes, but not
    non-intelligent like trees and stone. Is it conscious? Yes, but not
    conscious like you when waking. Is it bright? Yes, but not bright
    like the sun or the moon." To the question, "What and who is
    Buddha?" Yuen Wu (En-go) replied: "Hold your tongue: the mouth is
    the gate of evils!" while Pao Fuh (Ho-fuku) answered to the same
    question: "No skill of art can picture Him." Thus Buddha is
    unnamable, indescribable, and indefinable, but we provisionally call
    Him Buddha.

    4. Buddha, the Universal Life.

    Zen conceives Buddha as a Being, who moves, stirs, inspires,
    enlivens, and vitalizes everything. Accordingly, we may call Him the
    Universal Life in the sense that He is the source of all lives in the
    universe. This Universal Life, according to Zen, pillars the heaven,
    supports the earth, glorifies the sun and moon, gives voice to
    thunder, tinges clouds, adorns the pasture with flowers, enriches the
    field with harvest, gives animals beauty and strength. Therefore,
    Zen declares even a dead clod of earth to be imbued with the divine
    life, just as Lowell expresses a similar idea when he says:

    "Every clod feels a stir of might,
    An instinct within it that reaches and towers,
    And groping blindly above it for light,
    Climbs to a soul in grass and flowers."

    One of our contemporary Zenists wittily observed that 'vegetables are
    the children of earth, that animals which feed on vegetables are the
    grand-children of earth, and that men who subsist on animals are the
    great-grand-children of earth.' If there be no life in earth, how
    could life come out of it? If there be no life, the same as the
    animal's life in the vegetables, how could animals sustain their
    lives feeding on vegetables? If there be no life similar to ours in
    animals, how could we sustain our life by subsisting on them? The
    poet must be in the right, not only in his esthetic, but in his
    scientific point of view, in saying-

    "I must
    Confess that I am only dust.
    But once a rose within me grew;
    Its rootlets shot, its flowerets flew;
    And all rose's sweetness rolled
    Throughout the texture of my mould;
    And so it is that I impart
    Perfume to them, whoever thou art."

    As we men live and act, so do our arteries; so does blood; so do
    corpuscles. As cells and protoplasm live and act, so do elements,
    molecules, and atoms. As elements and atoms live and act, so do
    clouds; so does the earth; so does the ocean, the Milky Way, and the
    Solar System. What is this life which pervades the grandest as well
    as the minutest works of Nature, and which may fitly be said 'greater
    than the greatest and smaller than the smallest?' It cannot be
    defined. It cannot be subjected to exact analysis. But it is
    directly experienced and recognized within us, just as the beauty of
    the rose is to be perceived and enjoyed, but not reduced to exact
    analysis. At any rate, it is something stirring, moving, acting and
    reacting continually. This something which can be experienced and
    felt and enjoyed directly by every one of us. This life of living
    principle in the microcosmos is identical with that of the
    macrocosmos, and the Universal Life of the macrocosmos is the common
    source of all lives. Therefore, the Mahaparinirvana-sutra says:

    "Tathagata (another name for Buddha) gives life to all beings, just
    as the lake Anavatapta gives rise to the four great rivers."
    "Tathagata," says the same sutra, "divides his own body into
    innumerable bodies, and also restores an infinite number of bodies to
    one body. Now be becomes cities, villages, houses, mountains,
    rivers, and trees; now he has a large body; now he has a small body;
    now he becomes men, women, boys, and girls."

    5. Life and Change.

    A peculiar phase of life is change which appears in the form of
    growth and decay. Nobody can deny the transitoriness of life. One
    of our friends humorously observed: "Everything in the world may be
    doubtful to you, but it can never be doubted that you will die."
    Life is like a burning lamp. Every minute its flame dies out and is
    renewed. Life is like a running stream. Every moment it pushes
    onward. If there be anything constant in this world of change, it
    should be change itself. Is it not just one step from rosy childhood
    to snowy age? Is it not just one moment from the nuptial song to the
    funeral-dirge? Who can live the same moment twice?
    In comparison with an organism, inorganic matter appears to be
    constant and changeless; but, in fact, it is equally subjected to
    ceaseless alteration. Every morning, looking into the mirror, you
    will find your visage reflected in it just as it was on the preceding
    day; so also every morning, looking at the sun and the earth, you
    will find them reflected in your retina just as they were on the
    previous morning; but the sun and the earth are no less changeless
    than you. Why do the sun and the earth seem changeless and constant
    to you? Only because you yourself undergo change more quickly than
    they. When you look at the clouds sweeping across the face of the
    moon, they seem to be at rest, and the moon in rapid motion; but, in
    fact, the clouds, as well as the moon, incessantly move on.

    Science might maintain the quantitative constancy of matter, but the
    so-called matter is mere abstraction. To say matter is changeless is
    as much as to say 2 is always 2, changeless and constant, because the
    arithmetical number is not more abstract than the physiological
    matter. The moon appears standing still when you look at her only a
    few moments. In like manner she seems to be free from change when
    you look at her in your short span of life. Astronomers,
    nevertheless, can tell you how she saw her better days, and is now in
    her wrinkles and white hair.

    6. Pessimistic View of the Ancient Hindus.

    In addition to this, the new theory of matter has entirely over
    thrown the old conception of the unchanging atoms, and they are now
    regarded to be composed of magnetic forces, ions, and corpuscles in
    incessant motion. Therefore we have no inert matter in the concrete,
    no unchanging thing in the sphere of experience, no constant organism
    in the transient universe. These considerations often led many
    thinkers, ancient and modern, to the pessimistic view of life. What
    is the use of your exertion, they would say, in accumulating wealth,
    which is doomed to melt away in the twinkling of an eye? What is the
    use of your striving after power, which is more short-lived than a
    bubble? What is the use of your endeavour in the reformation of
    society, which does not endure any longer than the castle in the air?
    How do kings differ from beggars in the eye of Transience? How do
    the rich differ from the poor, how the beautiful from the ugly, bow
    the young from the old, how the good from the evil, how the lucky
    from the unlucky, how the wise from the unwise, in the court of
    Death? Vain is ambition. Vain is fame. Vain is pleasure. Vain are
    struggles and efforts. All is in vain. An ancient Hindu
    thinker[FN#144] says:

    "O saint, what is the use of the enjoyment of pleasures in this
    offensive, pithless body--a mere mass of bones, skins, sinews,
    marrow, and flesh? What is the use of the enjoyment of pleasures in
    this body, which is assailed by lust, hatred, greed, delusion, fear,
    anguish, jealousy, separation from what is loved, union with what is
    not loved, hunger, old age, death, illness, grief, and other evils?
    In such a world as this, what is the use of the enjoyment of
    pleasures, if he who has fed on them is to return to this world again
    and again? In this world I am like a frog in a dry well."

    [FN#144] Maitrayana Upanisad.

    It is this consideration on the transitoriness of life that led some
    Taoist in China to prefer death to life, as expressed in Chwang Tsz

    "When Kwang-zze went to Khu, he saw an empty skull, bleached indeed,
    but still retaining its shape. Tapping it with his horse-switch, he
    asked it saying: 'Did you, sir, in your greed of life, fail in the
    lessons of reason and come to this? Or did you do so, in the service
    of a perishing state, by the punishment of an axe? Or was it through
    your evil conduct, reflecting disgrace on your parents and on your
    wife and children? Or was it through your hard endurances of cold
    and hunger? Or was it that you had completed your term of life?'

    "Having given expression to these questions, he took up the skull and
    made a pillow of it, and went to sleep. At midnight the skull
    appeared to him in a dream, and said: 'What you said to me was after
    the fashion of an orator. All your words were about the
    entanglements of men in their lifetime. There are none of those
    things after death. Would you like to hear me, sir, tell you about
    death?' 'I should,' said Kwang-zze, and the skull resumed: 'In death
    there are not (the distinctions of) ruler above minister below.
    There are none of the phenomena of the four seasons. Tranquil and at
    ease, our years are those of heaven and earth. No king in his court
    has greater enjoyment than we have.' Kwang-zze did not believe it,
    and said: 'If I could get the Ruler of our Destiny to restore your
    body to life with its bones and flesh and skin, and to give you back
    your father and mother, your wife and children, and all your village
    acquaintances, would you wish me to do so?' The skull stared fixedly
    at him, and knitted its brows and said: 'How should I cast away the
    enjoyment of my royal court, and undertake again the toils of life
    among mankind?'"

    [FN#145] 'Chwang Tsz,' vol. vi., p. 23.

    7. Hinayanism and its Doctrine.

    The doctrine of Transience was the first entrance gate of Hinayanism.
    Transience never fails to deprive us of what is dear and near to us.
    It disappoints us in our expectation and hope. It brings out grief,
    fear, anguish, and lamentation. It spreads terror and destruction
    among families, communities, nations, mankind. It threatens with
    perdition the whole earth, the whole universe. Therefore it follows
    that life is full of disappointment, sufferings, and miseries, and
    that man is like 'a frog in a dry well.' This is the doctrine called
    by the Hinayanists the Holy Truth of Suffering.

    Again, when Transcience once gets hold of our imagination, we can
    easily foresee ruins and disasters in the very midst of prosperity
    and happiness, and also old age and ugliness in the prime and youth
    of beauty. It gives rise quite naturally to the thought that body is
    a bag full of pus and blood, a mere heap of rotten flesh and broken
    pieces of bone, a decaying corpse inhabited by innumerable maggots.
    This is the doctrine called by the Hinayanists the Holy Truth of

    [FN#146] Mahasaptipatthana Suttanta, 7, runs as follows: "And,
    moreover, bhikkhu, a brother, just as if he had been a body abandoned
    in the charnel-field, dead for one, two, or three days, swollen,
    turning black and blue, and decomposed, apply that perception to this
    very body (of his own), reflecting: 'This body, too, is even so
    constituted, is of such a nature, has not got beyond that (fate).'"

    And, again, Transience holds its tyrannical sway not only over the
    material but over the spiritual world. At its touch Atman, or soul,
    is brought to nothing. By its call Devas, or celestial beings, are
    made to succumb to death. It follows, therefore, that to believe in
    Atman, eternal and unchanging, would be a whim of the ignorant. This
    is the doctrine called by the Hinayanists the Holy Truth of No-atman.

    If, as said, there could be nothing free from Transience, Constancy
    should be a gross mistake of the ignorant; if even gods have to die,
    Eternity should be no more than a stupid dream of the vulgar; if all
    phenomena be flowing and changing, there could be no constant noumena
    underlying them. It therefore follows that all things in the
    universe are empty and unreal. This is the doctrine called by the
    Hinayanists the Holy Truth of Unreality. Thus Hinayana Buddhism,
    starting from the doctrine of Transience, arrived at the pessimistic
    view of life in its extreme form.

    8. Change as seen by Zen.

    Zen, like Hinayanism, does not deny the doctrine of Transience, but
    it has come to a view diametrically opposite to that of the Hindus.
    Transience for Zen simply means change. It is a form in which life
    manifests itself. Where there is life there is change or Transience.
    Where there is more change there is more vital activity. Suppose an
    absolutely changeless body: it must be absolutely lifeless. An
    eternally changeless life is equivalent to an eternally changeless
    death. Why do we value the morning glory, which fades in a few
    hours, more than an artificial glass flower, which endures hundreds
    of years? Why do we prefer an animal life, which passes away in a
    few scores of years, to a vegetable life, which can exist thousands
    of years? Why do we prize changing organism more than inorganic
    matter, unchanging and constant? If there be no change in the bright
    hues of a flower, it is as worthless as a stone. If there be no
    change in the song of a bird, it is as valueless as a whistling wind.
    If there be no change in trees and grass, they are utterly
    unsuitable to be planted in a garden. Now, then, what is the use of
    our life, if it stand still? As the water of a running stream is
    always fresh and wholesome because it does not stop for a moment, so
    life is ever fresh and new because it does not stand still, but
    rapidly moves on from parents to children, from children to
    grandchildren, from grandchildren to great-grandchildren, and flows
    on through generation after generation, renewing itself ceaselessly.

    We can never deny the existence of old age and death--nay, death is
    of capital importance for a continuation of life, because death
    carries away all the decaying organism in the way of life. But for
    it life would be choked up with organic rubbish. The only way of
    life's pushing itself onward or its renewing itself is its producing
    of the young and getting rid of the old. If there be no old age nor
    death, life is not life, but death.

    9. Life and Change.

    Transformation and change are the essential features of life; life is
    not transformation nor change itself, as Bergson seems to assume. It
    is something which comes under our observation through transformation
    and change. There are, among Buddhists as well as Christians, not a
    few who covet constancy and fixity of life, being allured by such
    smooth names as eternal life, everlasting joy, permanent peace, and
    what not. They have forgotten that their souls can never rest
    content with things monotonous. If there be everlasting joy for
    their souls, it must be presented to them through incessant change.
    So also if there be eternal life granted for their souls, it must be
    given through ceaseless alteration. What is the difference between
    eternal life, fixed and constant, and eternal death? What is the
    difference between everlasting bliss, changeless and monotonous, and
    everlasting suffering? If constancy, instead of change, govern life,
    then hope or pleasure is absolutely impossible. Fortunately,
    however, life is not constant. It changes and becomes. Pleasure
    arises through change itself. Mere change of food or clothes is
    often pleasing to us, while the appearance of the same thing twice or
    thrice, however pleasing it may be, causes us little pleasure. It
    will become disgusting and tire us down, if it be presented
    repeatedly from time to time.

    An important element in the pleasure we derive from social meetings,
    from travels, from sight-seeings, etc., is nothing but change. Even
    intellectual pleasure consists mainly of change. A dead, unchanging
    abstract truth, 2 and 2 make 4, excites no interest; while a
    changeable, concrete truth, such as the Darwinian theory of
    evolution, excites a keen interest.

    10. Life, Change, and Hope.

    The doctrine of Transcience never drives us to the pessimistic view
    of life. On the contrary, it gives us an inexhaustible source of
    pleasure and hope. Let us ask you: Are you satisfied with the
    present state of things? Do you not sympathize with poverty-stricken
    millions living side by side with millionaires saturated with wealth?
    Do you not shed tears over those hunger-bitten children who cower in
    the dark lanes of a great city? Do you not wish to put down the
    stupendous oppressor--Might-is-right? Do you not want to do away
    with the so-called armoured peace among nations? Do you not need to
    mitigate the struggle for existence more sanguine than the war of

    Life changes and is changeable; consequently, has its future. Hope
    is therefore possible. Individual development, social betterment,
    international peace, reformation of mankind in general, can be hoped.
    Our ideal, however unpractical it may seem at the first sight, can
    be realized. Moreover, the world itself, too, is changing and
    changeable. It reveals new phases from time to time, and can be
    moulded to subserve our purpose. We must not take life or the world
    as completed and doomed as it is now. No fact verifies the belief
    that the world was ever created by some other power and predestined
    to be as it is now. It lives, acts, and changes. It is transforming
    itself continually, just as we are changing and becoming. Thus the
    doctrine of Transience supplies us with an inexhaustible source of
    hope and comfort, leads us into the living universe, and introduces
    us to the presence of Universal Life or Buddha.

    The reader may easily understand how Zen conceives Buddha as the
    living principle from the following dialogues: "Is it true, sir,"
    asked a monk of Teu tsz (To-shi), "that all the voices of Nature are
    those of Buddha?" "Yes, certainly," replied Teu tsz. "What is,
    reverend sir," asked a man of Chao Cheu (Jo-shu), "the holy temple
    (of Buddha)?" "An innocent girl," replied the teacher. "Who is the
    master of the temple?" asked the other again. "A baby in her womb,"
    was the answer. "What is, sir," asked a monk to Yen Kwan (Yen-kan),
    "the original body of Buddha Vairocana?"[FN#147] "Fetch me a pitcher
    with water," said the teacher. The monk did as he was ordered. "Put
    it back in its place," said Yen Kwan again.[FN#148]

    [FN#147] Literally, All Illuminating Buddha, the highest of the
    Trikayas. See Eitel, p. 192.

    [FN#148] Zen-rin-rui-shu.

    11. Everything is Living according to Zen.

    Everything alive has a strong innate tendency to preserve itself, to
    assert itself, to push itself forward, and to act on its environment,
    consciously or unconsciously. The innate, strong tendency of the
    living is an undeveloped, but fundamental, nature of Spirit or Mind.
    It shows itself first in inert matter as impenetrability, or
    affinity, or mechanical force. Rock has a powerful tendency to
    preserve itself. And it is hard to crush it. Diamond has a robust
    tendency to assert itself. And it permits nothing to destroy it.
    Salt has the same strong tendency, for its particles act and react by
    themselves, and never cease till its crystals are formed. Steam,
    too, should have the same, because it pushes aside everything in its
    way and goes where it will.

    In the eye of simple folks of old, mountains, rivers, trees,
    serpents, oxen, and eagles were equally full of life; hence the
    deification of them. No doubt it is irrational to believe in nymphs,
    fairies, elves, and the like, yet still we may say that mountains
    stand of their own accord, rivers run as they will, just as we say
    that trees and grass turn their leaves towards the sun of their own
    accord. Neither is it a mere figure of speech to say that thunder
    speaks and hills respond, nor to describe birds as singing and
    flowers as smiling, nor to narrate winds as moaning and rain as
    weeping, nor to state lovers as looking at the moon, the moon as
    looking at them, when we observe spiritual element in activities of
    all this. Haeckel says, not without reason: "I cannot imagine the
    simple chemical and physical forces without attributing the movement
    of material particles to conscious sensation." The same author says
    again: "We may ascribe the feeling of pleasure and pain to all atoms,
    and so explain the electric affinity in chemistry."

    12. The Creative Force of Nature and Humanity.

    The innate tendency of self-preservation, which manifests itself as
    mechanical force or chemical affinity in the inorganic nature,
    unfolds itself as the desire of the preservation of species in the
    vegetables and animals. See how vegetables fertilize themselves in a
    complicated way, and how they spread their seeds far and wide in a
    most mysterious manner. A far more developed form of the same desire
    is seen in the sexual attachment and parental love of animals. Who
    does not know that even the smallest birds defend their young against
    every enemy with self -sacrificing courage, and that they bring food
    whilst they themselves often starve and grow lean? In human beings
    we can observe the various transformations of the self-same desire.
    For instance, sorrow or despair is experienced when it is impossible;
    anger, when it is hindered by others; joy, when it is fulfilled;
    fear, when it is threatened; pleasure, when it is facilitated.
    Although it manifests itself as the sexual attachment and parental
    love in lower animals, yet its developed forms, such as sympathy,
    loyalty, benevolence, mercy, humanity, are observed in human beings.
    Again, the creative force in inorganic nature, in order to assert
    itself and act more effectively, creates the germ of organic nature,
    and gradually ascending the scale of evolution, develops the sense
    organs and the nervous system; hence intellectual powers, such as
    sensation, perception, imagination, memory, unfold themselves. Thus
    the creative force, exerting itself gradually, widens its sphere of
    action, and necessitates the union of individuals into families,
    clans, tribes, communities, and nations. For the sake of this union
    and co-operation they established customs, enacted laws, and
    instituted political and educational systems. Furthermore, to
    reinforce itself, it gave birth to languages and sciences; and to
    enrich itself, morality and religion.

    13. Universal Life is Universal Spirit.

    These considerations naturally lead us to see that Universal Life is
    not a blind vital force, but Creative Spirit, or Mind, or
    Consciousness, which unfolds itself in myriads of ways. Everything
    in the universe, according to Zen, lives and acts, and at the same
    time discloses its spirit. To be alive is identically the same as to
    be spiritual. As the poet has his song, so does the nightingale, so
    does the cricket, so does the rivulet. As we are pleased or
    offended, so are horses, so are dogs, so are sparrows, ants,
    earthworms, and mushrooms. Simpler the body, simpler its spirit;
    more complicated the body, more complicated its spirit. 'Mind
    slumbers in the pebble, dreams in the plant, gathers energy in the
    animal, and awakens to self-conscious discovery in the soul of man.'

    It is this Creative, Universal Spirit that sends forth Aurora to
    illuminate the sky, that makes Diana shed her benign rays and Æolus
    play on his harp, wreathes spring with flowers, that clothes autumn
    with gold, that induces plants to put forth blossoms, that incites
    animals to be energetic, and that awakens consciousness in man. The
    author of Mahavaipulya-purnabuddha-sutra expressly states our idea
    when he says: "Mountains, rivers, skies, the earth: all these are
    embraced in the True Spirit, enlightened and mysterious." Rin-zai
    also says: "Spirit is formless, but it penetrates through the world
    in the ten directions."[FN#149] The Sixth Patriarch expresses the
    same idea more explicitly: "What creates the phenomena is Mind; what
    transcends all the phenomena is Buddha."[FN#150]

    [FN#149] Rin-zai-roku.

    [FN#150] Roku-so-dan-kyo.

    14. Poetical Intuition and Zen.

    Since Universal Life or Spirit permeates the universe, the poetical
    intuition of man never fails to find it, and to delight in everything
    typical of that Spirit. "The leaves of the plantain," says a Zen
    poet, "unfold themselves, hearing the voice of thunder. The flowers
    of the hollyhock turn towards the sun, looking at it all day long."
    Jesus could see in the lily the Unseen Being who clothed it so
    lovely. Wordsworth found the most profound thing in all the world to
    be the universal spiritual life, which manifests itself most directly
    in nature, clothed in its own proper dignity and peace. "Through
    every star," says Carlyle, "through every grass blade, most through
    every soul, the glory of present God still beams."

    It is not only grandeur and sublimity that indicate Universal Life,
    but smallness and commonplace do the same. A sage of old awakened to
    the faith[FN#151] when he heard a bell ring; another, when he looked
    at the peach blossom; another, when he heard the frogs croaking; and
    another, when he saw his own form reflected in a river. The minutest
    particles of dust form a world. The meanest grain of sand under our
    foot proclaims a divine law. Therefore Teu Tsz Jo-shi), pointing to
    a stone in front of his temple, said: "All the Buddhas of the past,
    the present, and the future are living therein."[FN#152]

    [FN#151] Both the Chinese and the Japanese history of Zen are full
    of such incidents.

    [FN#152] Zen-rin-rui-shu and To-shi-go-roku.

    15. Enlightened Consciousness.

    In addition to these considerations, which mainly depend on indirect
    experience, we can have direct experience of life within us. In the
    first place, we experience that our life is not a bare mechanical
    motion or change, but is a spiritual, purposive, and self-directing
    force. In the second place, we directly experience that it knows,
    feels, and wills. In the third place, we experience that there
    exists some power unifying the intellectual, emotional, and
    volitional activities so as to make life uniform and rational.
    Lastly, we experience that there lies deeply rooted within us
    Enlightened Consciousness, which neither psychologists treat of nor
    philosophers believe in, but which Zen teachers expound with strong
    conviction. Enlightened Consciousness is, according to Zen, the
    centre of spiritual life. It is the mind of minds, and the
    consciousness of consciousness. It is the Universal Spirit awakened
    in the human mind. It is not the mind that feels joy or sorrow; nor
    is it the mind that reasons and infers; nor is it the mind that
    fancies and dreams; nor is it the mind that hopes and fears; nor is
    it the mind that distinguishes good from evil. It is Enlightened
    Consciousness that holds communion with Universal Spirit or Buddha,
    and realizes that individual lives are inseparably united, and of one
    and the same nature with Universal Life. It is always bright as a
    burnished mirror, and cannot be dimmed by doubt and ignorance. It is
    ever pure as a lotus flower, and cannot be polluted by the mud of
    evil and folly. Although all sentient beings are endowed with this
    Enlightened Consciousness, they are not aware of its existence,
    excepting men who can discover it by the practice of Meditation.
    Enlightened consciousness is often called Buddha-nature, as it is the
    real nature of Universal Spirit. Zen teachers compare it with a
    precious stone ever fresh and pure, even if it be buried in the heaps
    of dust. Its divine light can never be extinguished by doubt or
    fear, just as the sunlight cannot be destroyed by mist and cloud.
    Let us quote a Chinese Zen poet to see how Zen treats of it:[FN#153]

    "I have an image of Buddha,
    The worldly people know it not.
    It is not made of clay or cloth,
    Nor is it carved out of wood,
    Nor is it moulded of earth nor of ashes.
    No artist can paint it;
    No robber can steal it.
    There it exists from dawn of time.
    It's clean, although not swept and wiped.
    Although it is but one,
    Divides itself to a hundred thousand million forms."

    [FN#153] See Zen-gaku-ho-ten.

    16. Buddha Dwelling in the Individual Mind.

    Enlightened Consciousness in the individual mind acquires for its
    possessor, not a relative knowledge of things as his intellect does,
    but the profoundest insight in reference to universal brotherhood of
    all beings, and enables him to understand the absolute holiness of
    their nature, and the highest goal for which all of them are making.
    Enlightened Consciousness once awakened within us serves as a guiding
    principle, and leads us to hope, bliss, and life; consequently, it is
    called the Master[FN#154] of both mind and body. Sometimes it is
    called the Original[FN#155] Mind, as it is the mind of minds. It is
    Buddha dwelling in individuals. You might call it God in man, if you
    like. The following dialogues all point to this single idea:

    On one occasion a butcher, who was used to kill one thousand sheep a
    day, came to Gotama, and, throwing down his butcher-knife, said "I am
    one of the thousand Buddhas." "Yes, really," replied Gotama. A
    monk, Hwui Chao (E-cha) by name, asked Pao Yen (Ho-gen): "What is
    Buddha?" "You are Hwui Chao," replied the master. The same question
    was put to Sheu Shan (Shu-zan), Chi Man (Chi-mon), and Teu Tsz
    (To-shi), the first of whom answered: "A bride mounts on a donkey and
    her mother-in-law drives it;" and the second: "He goes barefooted,
    his sandals being worn out;" while the third rose from his chair and
    stood still without saying a word. Chwen Hih (Fu-kiu) explains this
    point in unequivocal terms: "Night after night I sleep with Buddha,
    and every morning I get up with Him. He accompanies me wherever I
    go. When I stand or sit, when I speak or be mute, when I am out or
    in, He never leaves me, even as a shadow accompanies body. Would you
    know where He is? Listen to that voice and word."[FN#156]

    [FN#154] It is often called the Lord or Master of mind.

    [FN#155] Another name for Buddha is the Original Mind"

    [FN#156] For such dialogues, see Sho-yo-roku, Mu-mon-kan,
    Heki-gan-shu. Fu-kiu's words are repeatedly quoted by Zen masters.

    17. Enlightened Consciousness is not an Intellectual Insight.

    Enlightened Consciousness is not a bare intellectual insight, for it
    is full of beautiful emotions. It loves, caresses, embraces, and at
    the same time esteems all beings, being ever merciful to them. It
    has no enemies to conquer, no evil to fight with, but constantly
    finds friends to help, good to promote. Its warm heart beats in
    harmony with those of all fellow beings. The author of
    Brahmajala-sutra fully expresses this idea as he says: "All women are
    our mothers; all men our fathers; all earth and water our bodies in
    the past existences; all fire and air our essence."

    Thus relying on our inner experience, which is the only direct way of
    knowing Buddha, we conceive Him as a Being with profound wisdom and
    boundless mercy, who loves all beings as His children, whom He is
    fostering, bringing up, guiding, and teaching. "These three worlds
    are His, and all beings living in them are His children."[FN#157]
    "The Blessed One is the mother of all sentient beings, and gives them
    all the milk of mercy."[FN#158] Some people named Him Absolute, as
    He is all light, all hope, all mercy, and all wisdom; some, Heaven,
    as He is high and enlightened; some, God, as He is sacred and
    mysterious; some, Truth, as He is true to Himself; some, Buddha, as
    He is free from illusion; some, Creator, as He is the creative force
    immanent in the universe; some, Path, as He is the Way we must
    follow; some, Unknowable, as He is beyond relative knowledge; some,
    Self, as He is the Self of individual selves. All these names are
    applied to one Being, whom we designate by the name of Universal Life
    or Spirit.

    [FN#157] Saddharma-pundarika-sutra.

    [FN#158] Mahaparinirvana-sutra.

    18. Our Conception of Buddha is not Final.

    Has, then, the divine nature of Universal Spirit been completely and
    exhaustively revealed in our Enlightened Consciousness? To this
    question we should answer negatively, for, so far as our limited
    experience is concerned, Universal Spirit reveals itself as a Being
    with profound wisdom and boundless mercy; this, nevertheless, does
    not imply that the conception is the only possible and complete one.
    We should always bear in mind that the world is alive, and changing,
    and moving. It goes on to disclose a new phase, or to add a new
    truth. The subtlest logic of old is a mere quibble of nowadays. The
    miracles of yesterday are the commonplaces of to-day. Now theories
    are formed, new discoveries are made, only to give their places to
    newer theories are discoveries. New ideals realized or new desires
    satisfied are sure to awaken newer and stronger desires. Not an
    instant life remains immutable, but it rushes on, amplifying and
    enriching itself from the dawn of time to the end of eternity.

    Therefore Universal Life may in the future possibly unfold its new
    spiritual content, yet unknown to us because it has refined, lifted
    up, and developed living beings from the amœba to man, increasing the
    intelligence and range of individuals, until highly civilized man
    emerge into the plane of consciousness-consciousness of divine light
    in him. Thus to believe in Buddha is to be content and thankful for
    the grace of His, and to hope for the infinite unfoldment of His
    glories in man.

    19. How to Worship Buddha.

    The author of Vimalakirtti-nirdeca-sutra well explains our attitude
    towards Buddha when he says: "We ask Buddha for nothing. We ask
    Dharma for nothing. We ask Samgha for nothing." Nothing we ask of
    Buddha. No worldly success, no rewards in the future life, no
    special blessing. Hwang Pah (O-baku) said: "I simply worship Buddha.
    I ask Buddha for nothing. I ask Dharma for nothing. I ask Samgha
    for nothing." Then a prince[FN#159] questioned him: "You ask Buddha
    for nothing. You ask Dharma for nothing. You ask Samgha for nothing.
    What, then, is the use of your worship?" The Prince earned a slap
    as an answer to his utilitarian question.[FN#160] This incident well
    illustrates that worship, as understood by Zen masters, is a pure act
    of thanksgiving, or the opening of the grateful heart; in other
    words, the disclosing of Enlightened Consciousness. We are living
    the very life of Buddha, enjoying His blessing, and holding communion
    with Him through speech, thought, and action. The earth is not 'the
    vale of tears,' but the glorious creation of Universal Spirit; nor
    man 'the poor miserable sinner' but the living altar of Buddha
    Himself. Whatever we do, we do with grateful heart and pure joy
    sanctioned by Enlightened Consciousness; eating, drinking, talking,
    walking, and every other work of our daily life are the worship and
    devotion. We agree with Margaret Fuller when she says: "Reverence
    the highest; have patience with the lowest; let this day's
    performance of the meanest duty be thy religion. Are the stars too
    distant? Pick up the pebble that lies at thy feet, and from it learn

    [FN#159] Afterwards the Emperor Suen Tsung (Sen-so), of the Tang

    [FN#160] For the details, see Heki-gan-shu.



    1. Man is Good-natured according to Mencius.[FN#161]

    Oriental scholars, especially the Chinese men of letters, seem to
    have taken so keen an interest in the study of human nature that they
    proposed all the possible opinions respecting the subject in
    question-namely, (1) man is good-natured; (2) man is bad-natured; (3)
    man is good-natured and bad-natured as well; (4) man is neither
    good-natured nor bad-natured. The first of these opinions was
    proposed by a most reputed Confucianist scholar, Mencius, and his
    followers, and is still adhered to by the majority of the Japanese
    and the Chinese Confucianists. Mencius thought it as natural for man
    to do good as it is for the grass to be green. 'Suppose a person has
    happened,' he would say, 'to find a child on the point of tumbling
    down into a deep well. He would rescue it even at the risk of his
    life, no matter how morally degenerated he might be. He would have
    no time to consider that his act might bring him some reward from its
    parents, or a good reputation among his friends and fellow-citizens.
    He would do it barely out of his inborn good-nature.' After
    enumerating some instances similar to this one, Mencius concludes
    that goodness is the fundamental nature of man, even if he is often
    carried away by his brutal disposition.

    [FN#161] Mencius (372-282 B.C.) is regarded as the beat expounder of
    the doctrine of Confucius. There exists a well-known work of his,
    entitled after his own name. See 'A History of Chinese Philosophy,'
    by R. Endo, and also 'A History of Chinese Philosophy' (pp. 38-50),
    by G. Nakauchi.

    2. Man is Bad-natured according to Siun Tsz[FN#162] (Jun-shi).

    The weaknesses of Mencius's theory are fully exposed by another
    diametrically opposed theory propounded by Siun Tsz (Jun-shi) and his
    followers. 'Man is bad-natured,' says Siun Tsz, 'since he has inborn
    lust, appetite, and desire for wealth. As he has inborn lust and
    appetite, he is naturally given to intemperance and wantonness. As
    he has inborn desire for wealth, he is naturally inclined to quarrel
    and fight with others for the sake of gain.' Leave him without
    discipline or culture, he would not be a whit better than the beast.
    His virtuous acts, such as charity, honesty, propriety, chastity,
    truthfulness, are conduct forced by the teachings of ancient sages
    against his natural inclination. Therefore vices are congenial and
    true to his nature, while virtues alien and untrue to his fundamental

    [FN#162] Siun Tsz's date is later by some fifty years than Mencius.
    Siun Tsz gives the reason why man seeks after morality, saying that
    man seeks what he has not, and that he seeks after morality simply
    because he has not morality, just as the poor seek riches. See 'A
    History of Chinese Philosophy' (pp. 51-60), by G. Nakauchi, and 'A
    History of Development of Chinese Thought,' by R. Endo.

    These two theories are not only far from throwing light on the moral
    state of man, but wrap it in deeper gloom. Let us raise a few
    questions by way of refutation. If man's fundamental nature be good,
    as Mencius maintains, why is it easy for him to be vicious without
    instruction, while he finds it hard to be virtuous even with
    instruction. If you contend that good is man's primary nature and
    evil the secondary one, why is be so often overpowered by the
    secondary nature? If you answer saying that man is good-natured
    originally, but he acquires the secondary nature through the struggle
    for existence, and it gradually gains power over the primary nature
    by means of the same cause, then the primitive tribes should be more
    virtuous than the highly civilized nations, and children than grownup
    people. Is this not contrary to fact?

    If, again, man's nature is essentially bad, as Siun Tsz holds, how
    can he cultivate virtue? If you contend that ancient sages invented
    so-called cardinal virtues and inculcated them against his natural
    inclination, why does he not give them up? If vices be congenial and
    true to man's nature, but virtues be alien and untrue to him, why are
    virtues honoured by him? If vices be genuine and virtue a deception,
    as you think, why do you call the inventors of that deceiving art
    sages? How was it possible for man to do good before these sages'
    appearance on earth?

    3. Man is both Good-natured and Bad-natured according to Yan
    Hiung[FN#163] (Yo-yu).

    According to Yang Hiung and his followers, good is no less real than
    evil, and evil is no more unreal than good. Therefore man must be
    double-natured-that is, partly good and partly bad. This is the
    reason why the history of man is full of fiendish crimes, and, at the
    same time, it abounds with godly deeds. This is the reason why
    mankind comprises, on the one hand, a Socrates, a Confucius, a Jesus,
    and, on the other, a Nero and a Kieh. This is the reason why we find
    to-day a honest fellow in him whom we find a betrayer to-morrow.

    [FN#163] Yan Hiung (died A.D. 18) is the reputed author of Tai Huen
    (Tai-gen) and Fah Yen (Ho-gen). His opinion in reference to human
    nature is found in Fah Yen.

    This view of man's nature might explain our present moral state, yet
    it calls forth many questions bard to answer. If this assertion be
    true, is it not a useless task to educate man with the purpose of
    making him better and nobler? How could one extirpate man's bad
    nature implanted within him at his origin? If man be double-natured,
    how did he come to set good over evil? How did he come to consider
    that he ought to be good and ought not to be bad? How could you
    establish the authority of morality?

    4. Man is neither Good-natured nor Bad-natured according to Su Shih

    The difficulty may be avoided by a theory given by Su Shih and other
    scholars influenced by Buddhism, which maintains that man is neither
    good-natured nor bad-natured. According to this opinion man is not
    moral nor immoral by nature, but unmoral. He is morally a blank. He
    is at a crossroad, so to speak, of morality when he is first born.
    As he if; blank, he can be dyed black or red. As he is at the
    cross-road, he can turn to the right or to the left. He is like
    fresh water, which has no flavour, and can be made sweet or bitter by
    circumstances. If we are not mistaken, this theory, too, has to
    encounter insurmountable difficulties. How could it be possible to
    make the unmoral being moral or immoral? We might as well try to get
    honey out of sand as to get good or evil out of the blank nature.
    There can be no fruit of good or evil where there is no seed of good
    or bad nature. Thus we find no satisfactory solution of the problem
    at issue in these four theories proposed by the Chinese scholars--the
    first theory being incompetent to explain the problem of human
    depravity; the second breaking down at the origin of morality; the
    third failing to explain the possibility of moral culture; the fourth
    being logically self-contradictory.

    [FN#164] Su Shih (1042-1101), a great man of letters, practiser of
    Zen, noted for his poetical works.

    5. There is no Mortal who is Purely Moral.

    By nature man should be either good or bad; or he should be good as
    well as bad; or he should be neither good nor bad. There can be no
    alternative possible besides these four propositions, none of which
    can be accepted as true. Then there must be some misconception in
    the terms of which they consist. It would seem to some that the
    error can be avoided by limiting the sense of the term 'man,' saying
    some persons are good-natured, some persons are bad-natured, some
    persons are good-natured and bad-natured as well, and some persons
    are neither good-natured nor bad-natured. There is no contradiction
    in these modified propositions, but still they fail to explain the
    ethical state of man. Supposing them all to be true, let us assume
    that there are the four classes of people: (1) Those who are purely
    moral and have no immoral disposition; (2) those who are half moral
    and half immoral; (3) those who are neither moral nor immoral; (4)
    those who are purely immoral and have no moral disposition. Orthodox
    Christians, believing in the sinlessness of Jesus, would say he
    belongs to the first class, while Mohammedans and Buddhists, who
    deify the founder of their respective faith, would in such case
    regard their founder as the purely moral personage. But are your
    beliefs, we should ask, based on historical fact? Can you say that
    such traditional and self-contradictory records as the four gospels
    are history in the strict sense of the term? Can you assert that
    those traditions which deify Mohammed and Shakya are the statements
    of bare facts? Is not Jesus an abstraction and an ideal, entirely
    different from a concrete carpenter's son, who fed on the same kind
    of food, sheltered himself in the same kind of building, suffered
    from the same kind of pain, was fired by the same kind of anger,
    stung by the same kind of lust as our own? Can you say the person
    who fought many a sanguinary battle, who got through many cunning
    negotiations with enemies and friends, who personally experienced the
    troubles of polygamy, was a person sinless and divine? We might
    allow that these ancient sages are superhuman and divine, then our
    classification has no business with them, because they do not
    properly belong to mankind. Now, then, who can point out any sinless
    person in the present world? Is it not a fact that the more virtuous
    one grows the more sinful he feels himself? If there be any mortal,
    in the past, the present, and the future, who declares himself to be
    pure and sinless, his very declaration proves that he is not highly
    moral. Therefore the existence of the first class of people is open
    to question.

    6. There is no Mortal who is Non-Moral or Purely Immoral.

    The same is the case with the third and the fourth class of people
    who are assumed as non-moral or purely immoral. There is no person,
    however morally degraded he may be, but reveals some good nature in
    his whole course of life. It is our daily experience that we find a
    faithful friend in the person even of a pickpocket, a loving father
    even in a burglar, and a kind neighbour even in a murderer. Faith,
    sympathy, friendship, love, loyalty, and generosity dwell not merely
    in palaces and churches, but also in brothels and gaols. On the
    other hand, abhorrent vices and bloody crimes often find shelter
    under the silk hat, or the robe, or the coronet, or the crown. Life
    may fitly be compared with a rope made of white and black straw, and
    to separate one from the other is to destroy the rope itself; so also
    life entirely independent of the duality of good and bad is no actual
    life. We must acknowledge, therefore, that the third and the fourth
    propositions are inconsistent with our daily experience of life, and
    that only the second proposition remains, which, as seen above,
    breaks down at the origin of morality.

    7. Where, then, does the Error Lie?

    Where, then, does the error lie in the four possible propositions
    respecting man's nature? It lies not in their subject, but in the
    predicate-that is to say, in the use of the terms 'good' and 'bad.'
    Now let us examine how does good differ from bad. A good action ever
    promotes interests in a sphere far wider than a bad action. Both are
    the same in their conducing to human interests, but differ in the
    extent in which they achieve their end. In other words, both good
    and bad actions are performed for one end and the same purpose of
    promoting human interests, but they differ from each other as to the
    extent of interests. For instance, burglary is evidently bad action,
    and is condemned everywhere; but the capturing of an enemy's property
    for the sake of one's own tribe or clan or nation is praised as a
    meritorious conduct. Both acts are exactly the same in their
    promoting interests; but the former relates to the interests of a
    single individual or of a single family, while the latter to those of
    a tribe or a nation. If the former be bad on account of its ignoring
    others' interests, the latter must be also bad on account of its
    ignoring the enemy's interests. Murder is considered bad everywhere;
    but the killing of thousands of men in a battle-field is praised and
    honoured, because the former is perpetrated to promote the private
    interests, while the latter those of the public. If the former be
    bad, because of its cruelty, the latter must also be bad, because of
    its inhumanity.

    The idea of good and bad, generally accepted by common sense, may be
    stated as follows: 'An action is good when it promotes the interests
    of an individual or a family; better when it promotes those of a
    district or a country; best when it promotes those of the whole
    world. An action is bad when it inflicts injury on another
    individual or another family; worse when it is prejudicial to a
    district or a country; worst when it brings harm on the whole world.
    Strictly speaking, an action is good when it promotes interests,
    material or spiritual, as intended by the actor in his motive; and it
    is bad when it injures interests, material or spiritual, as intended
    by the actor in his motive.'

    According to this idea, generally accepted by common sense, human
    actions may be classified under four different heads: (1) Purely good
    actions; (2) partly good and partly bad actions; (3) neither good nor
    bad actions; (4) purely bad actions. First, purely good actions are
    those actions which subserve and never hinder human interests either
    material or spiritual, such as humanity and love of all beings.
    Secondly, partly good and partly bad actions are those actions which
    are both for and against human interests, such as narrow patriotism
    and prejudiced love. Thirdly, neither good nor bad actions are such
    actions as are neither for nor against human interests--for example,
    an unconscious act of a dreamer. Lastly, purely bad actions, which
    are absolutely against human interests, cannot be possible for man
    except suicide, because every action promotes more or less the
    interests, material or spiritual, of the individual agent or of
    someone else. Even such horrible crimes as homicide and parricide
    are intended to promote some interests, and carry out in some measure
    their aim when performed. It follows that man cannot be said to be
    good or bad in the strict sense of the terms as above defined, for
    there is no human being who does the first class of actions and
    nothing else, nor is there any mortal who does the fourth class of
    actions and nothing else. Man may be called good and bad, and at the
    same time be neither good nor bad, in that he always performs the
    second and the third class of actions. All this, nevertheless, is a
    more play of words. Thus we are driven to conclude that the
    common-sense view of human nature fails to grasp the real state of
    actual life.

    8. Man is not Good-natured nor Bad-natured, but Buddha-natured.

    We have had already occasion to observe that Zen teaches
    Buddha-nature, which all sentient beings are endowed with. The term
    'Buddha-nature,'[FN#165] as accepted generally by Buddhists, means a
    latent and undeveloped nature, which enables its owner to become
    Enlightened when it is developed and brought to actuality.[FN#166]
    Therefore man, according to Zen, is not good-natured nor bad-natured
    in the relative sense, as accepted generally by common sense, of
    these terms, but Buddha-natured in the sense of non-duality. A good
    person (of common sense) differs from a bad person (of common sense),
    not in his inborn Buddha-nature, but in the extent of his expressing
    it in deeds. Even if men are equally endowed with that nature, yet
    their different states of development do not allow them to express it
    to an equal extent in conduct. Buddha-nature may be compared with
    the sun, and individual mind with the sky. Then an Enlightened mind
    is like the sky in fair weather, when nothing prevents the beams of
    the sun; while an ignorant mind is like the sky in cloudy weather,
    when the sun sheds faint light; and an evil mind is like the sky in
    stormy weather, when the sun seems to be out of existence. It comes
    under our daily observation that even a robber or a murderer may
    prove to be a good father and a loving husband to his wife and
    children. He is an honest fellow when he remains at home. The sun
    of Buddha-nature gives light within the wall of his house, but
    without the house the darkness of foul crimes shrouds him.

    [FN#165] For a detailed explanation of Buddha-nature, see the
    chapter entitled Buddha-nature in Sho-bo-gen-zo.

    [FN#166] Mahaparinirvana-sutra may be said to have been written for
    the purpose of stating this idea.

    9. The Parable of the Robber Kih.[FN#167]

    Chwang Tsz (So-shi) remarks in a humorous way to the following
    effect: "The followers of the great robber and murderer Kih asked him
    saying: 'Has the robber also any moral principles in his
    proceedings?' He replied: 'What profession is there which has not
    its principles? That the robber comes to the conclusion without
    mistake that there are valuable deposits in an apartment shows his
    wisdom; that he is the first to enter it shows his bravery; that he
    makes an equal division of the plunder shows his justice; that he
    never betrays the fellow-robbers shows his faithfulness; and that he
    is generous to the followers shows his benevolence. Without all
    these five qualities no one in the world has ever attained to become
    a great robber.'" The parable clearly shows us Buddha-nature of the
    robber and murderer expresses itself as wisdom, bravery, justice,
    faithfulness, and benevolence in his society, and that if he did the
    same outside it, he would not be a great robber but a great sage.

    [FN#167] The parable is told for the purpose of undervaluing
    Confucian doctrine, but the author thereby accidentally touches human
    nature. We do not quote it here with the same purpose as the

    10. Wang Yang Ming (O-yo-mei) and a Thief.

    One evening when Wang was giving a lecture to a number of students on
    his famous doctrine that all human beings are endowed with
    Conscience,[FN#168] a thief broke into the house and hid himself in
    the darkest corner. Then Wang declared aloud that every human being
    is born with Conscience, and that even the thief who had got into the
    house had Conscience just as the sages of old. The burglar,
    overhearing these remarks, came out to ask the forgiveness of the
    master; since there was no way of escape for him, and he was
    half-naked, he crouched behind the students. Wang's willing
    forgiveness and cordial treatment encouraged the man to ask the
    question how the teacher could know such a poor wretch as he was
    endowed with Conscience as the sages of old. Wang replied: "It is
    your Conscience that makes you ashamed of your nakedness. You
    yourself are a sage, if you abstain from everything that will put
    shame on you." We firmly believe that Wang is perfectly right in
    telling the thief that he was not different in nature from the sages
    of old. It is no exaggeration. It is a saving truth. It is also a
    most effective way of saving men out of darkness of sin. Any thief
    ceases to be a thief the moment he believes in his own Conscience, or
    Buddha-nature. You can never correct criminals by your severe
    reproach or punishment. You can save them only through your sympathy
    and love, by which you call forth their inborn Buddha-nature.
    Nothing can produce more pernicious effects on criminals than to
    treat them as if they were a different sort of people and confirm
    them in their conviction that they are bad-natured. We greatly
    regret that even in a civilized society authorities neglecting this
    saving truth are driving to perdition those criminals under their
    care, whom it is their duty to save.

    [FN#168] It is not conscience in the ordinary sense of the term. It
    is 'moral' principle, according to Wang, pervading through the
    Universe. 'It expresses itself as Providence in Heaven, as moral
    nature in man, and as mechanical laws in things.' The reader will
    notice that Wang's Conscience is the nearest approach to

    11. The Bad are the Good in the Egg.

    This is not only the case with a robber or a murderer, but also with
    ordinary people. There are many who are honest and good in their
    homesteads, but turn out to be base and dishonest folk outside them.
    Similarly, there are those who, having an enthusiastic love of their
    local district, act unlawfully against the interests of other
    districts. They are upright and honourable gentlemen within the
    boundary of their own district, but a gang of rascals without it. So
    also there are many who are Washingtons and William Tells in their
    own, but at the same time pirates and cannibals in the other
    countries. Again, there are not a few persons who, having racial
    prejudices, would not allow the rays of their Buddha-nature to pass
    through a coloured skin. There are civilized persons who are humane
    enough to love and esteem any human being as their brother, but so
    unfeeling that they think lower creatures as their proper food. The
    highly enlightened person, however, cannot but sympathize with human
    beings and lower creatures as well, as Shakya Muni felt all sentient
    beings to be his children.

    These people are exactly the same in their Buddha-nature, but a wide
    difference obtains among them in the extent of their expressing that
    nature in deeds. If thieves and murderers be called bad-natured,
    reformers and revolutionists should be called so. If, on the other
    hand, patriotism and loyalty be said to be good, treason and
    insurrection should likewise be so. Therefore it is evident that a
    so-called good person is none but one who acts to promote wider
    interests of life, and a so-called bad person is none but one who
    acts to advance narrower ones. In other words, the bad are the good
    in the egg, so to speak, and the good are the bad on the wing. As
    the bird in the egg is one and the same as the bird on the wing, so
    the good in the egg is entirely of the same nature as the bad on the
    wing. To show that human nature transcends the duality of good and
    evil, the author of Avatamsaka-sutra declares that 'all beings are
    endowed with the wisdom and virtue of Tathagata.' Kwei Fung (Kei-ho)
    also says: "All sentient beings have the Real Spirit of Original
    Enlightenment (within themselves). It is unchanging and pure. It is
    eternally bright and clear, and conscious. It is also named
    Buddha-nature, or Tathagata-garbha."

    12. The Great Person and Small Person.

    For these reasons Zen proposes to call man Buddha-natured or
    Good-natured in a sense transcendental to the duality of good and
    bad. It conveys no sense to call some individuals good in case there
    is no bad individual. For the sake of convenience, however, Zen
    calls man good, as is exemplified by Shakya Muni, who was wont to
    address his hearers as 'good men and women,' and by the Sixth
    Patriarch in China, who called everybody 'a good and wise one.' This
    does not imply in the least that all human beings are virtuous,
    sinless, and saintly-nay, the world is full of vices and crimes. It
    is an undeniable fact that life is the warfare of good against evil,
    and many a valiant hero has fallen in the foremost ranks. It is
    curious, however, to notice that the champions on the both sides are
    fighting for the same cause. There can be no single individual in
    the world who is fighting against his own cause or interest, and the
    only possible difference between one party and the other consists in
    the extent of interests which they fight for. So-called bad persons,
    who are properly designated as 'small persons' by Chinese and
    Japanese scholars, express their Buddha-nature to a small extent
    mostly within their own doors, while so-called good persons, or
    'great persons' as the Oriental scholars call them, actualize their
    Buddha-nature to a large extent in the whole sphere of a country, or
    of the whole earth.

    Enlightened Consciousness, or Buddha-nature, as we have seen in the
    previous chapter, is the mind of mind and the consciousness of
    consciousness, Universal Spirit awakened in individual minds, which
    realizes the universal brotherhood of all beings and the unity of
    individual lives. It is the real self, the guiding principle, the
    Original Physiognomy[FN#169] (nature), as it is called by Zen, of
    man. This real self lies dormant under the threshold of
    consciousness in the minds of the confused; consequently, each of
    them is inclined to regard petty individual as his self, and to exert
    himself to further the interests of the individual self even at the
    cost of those of the others. He is 'the smallest person' in the
    world, for his self is reduced to the smallest extent possible. Some
    of the less confused identify their selves with their families, and
    feel happy or unhappy in proportion as their families are happy or
    unhappy, for the sake of which they sacrifice the interests of other
    families. On the other hand, some of the more enlightened unite
    their selves through love and compassion with their whole tribe or
    countrymen, and consider the rise or fall of the tribe or of the
    country as their own, and willingly sacrifice their own lives, if
    need be, for the cause of the tribe or the country. When they are
    fully enlightened, they can realize the unity of all sentient lives,
    and be ever merciful and helpful towards all creatures. They are
    'the greatest persons' on earth, because their selves are enlarged to
    the greatest extent possible.

    [FN#169] The expression first occurs in Ho-bo-dan-kyo of the Sixth
    Patriarch, and is frequently used by later Zenists.

    13. The Theory of Buddha-Nature adequately explains the Ethical
    States of Man.

    This theory of Buddha-nature enables us to get an insight into the
    origin of morality. The first awakening of Buddha-nature within man
    is the very beginning of morality, and man's ethical progress is the
    gradually widening expression of that nature in conduct. But for it
    morality is impossible for man. But for it not only moral culture or
    discipline, but education and social improvement must be futile.
    Again, the theory adequately explains the ethical facts that the
    standard of morality undergoes change in different times and places,
    that good and bad are so inseparably knit together, and that the bad
    at times become good all on a sudden, and the good grow bad quite
    unexpectedly. First, it goes without saying that the standard of
    morality is raised just in proportion as Buddha-nature or real self
    extends and amplifies itself in different times and places.
    Secondly, since good is Buddha-nature actualized to a large extent,
    and bad is also Buddha-nature actualized to a small extent, the
    existence of the former presupposes that of the latter, and the mess
    of duality can never be got rid of. Thirdly, the fact that the bad
    become good under certain circumstances, and the good also become bad
    often unexpectedly, can hardly be explained by the dualistic theory,
    because if good nature be so arbitrarily turned into bad and bad
    nature into good, the distinction of good and bad nature has no
    meaning whatever. According to the theory of Buddha-nature, the fact
    that the good become bad or the bad become good, does not imply in
    the least a change of nature, but the widening or the narrowing of
    its actualization. So that no matter how morally degenerated one may
    be, he can uplift himself to a high ethical plane by the widening of
    his self, and at the same time no matter how morally exalted one may
    be, he can descend to the level of the brute by the narrowing of his
    self. To be an angel or to be a devil rests with one's degrees of
    enlightenment and free choice. This is why such infinite varieties
    exist both among the good and the bad. This is why the higher the
    peak of enlightenment the people climb, the more widely the vista of
    moral possibilities open before them.

    14. Buddha-Nature is the Common Source of Morals.

    Furthermore, Buddha-nature or real self, being the seat of love and
    the nucleus of sincerity, forms the warp and woof of all moral
    actions. He is an obedient son who serves his parents with sincerity
    and love. He is a loyal subject who serves his master with sincerity
    and love. A virtuous wife is she who loves her husband with her
    sincere heart. A trustworthy friend is he who keeps company with
    others with sincerity and love. A man of righteousness is he who
    leads a life of sincerity and love. Generous and humane is he who
    sympathizes with his fellow-men with his sincere heart. Veracity,
    chastity, filial piety, loyalty, righteousness, generosity, humanity,
    and what not-all-this is no other than Buddha-nature applied to
    various relationships of human brotherhood. This is the common
    source, ever fresh and inexhaustible, of morality that fosters and
    furthers the interests of all. To-ju[FN#170] expresses the similar
    idea as follows:

    "There exists the Inexhaustible Source (of morality) within me.
    It is an invaluable treasure.
    It is called Bright Nature of man.
    It is peerless and surpasses all jewels.
    The aim of learning is to bring out this Bright Nature.
    This is the best thing in the world.
    Real happiness can only be secured by it."

    Thus, in the first place, moral conduct, which is nothing but the
    expression of Buddha-nature in action, implies the assertion of self
    and the furtherance of one's interests. On this point is based the
    half-truth of the Egoistic theory. Secondly, it is invariably
    accompanied by a feeling of pleasure or satisfaction when it fulfils
    its end. This accidental concomitance is mistaken for its essence by
    superficial observers who adhere to the Hedonistic theory. Thirdly,
    it conduces to the furtherance of the material and spiritual
    interests of man, and it led the Utilitarians to the confusion of the
    result with the cause of morality. Fourthly, it involves the control
    or sacrifice of the lower and ignoble self of an individual in order
    to realize his higher and nobler self. This gave rise to the
    half-truth of the Ascetic theory of morality.

    [FN#170] To-ju Naka-e (died A.D. 1649), the founder of the Japanese
    Wang School of Confucianism, known as the Sage of Omi.

    15. The Parable of a Drunkard.

    Now the question arises, If all human beings are endowed with
    Buddha-nature, why have they not come naturally to be Enlightened?
    To answer this question, the Indian Mahayanists[FN#171] told the
    parable of a drunkard who forgets the precious gems put in his own
    pocket by one of his friends. The man is drunk with the poisonous
    liquor of selfishness, led astray by the alluring sight of the
    sensual objects, and goes mad with anger, lust, and folly. Thus he
    is in a state of moral poverty, entirely forgetting the precious gem
    of Buddha-nature within him. To be in an honourable position in
    society as the owner of that valuable property, he must first get rid
    himself of the influence of the liquor of self, and detach himself
    from sensual objects, gain control over his passion, restore peace
    and sincerity to his mind, and illumine his whole existence by his
    inborn divine light. Otherwise he has to remain in the same plight
    to all eternity.

    [FN#171] Mahaparinirvana-sutra.

    Lot us avail ourselves of another figure to explain more clearly the
    point at issue. Universal Spirit may fitly be likened to the
    universal water, or water circulating through the whole earth. This
    universal water exists everywhere. It exists in the tree. It exists
    in the grass. It exists in the mountain. It exists in the river.
    It exists in the sea. It exists in the air. It exists in the cloud.
    Thus man is not only surrounded by water on all sides, but it
    penetrates his very body. But be can never appease his thirst
    without drinking water. In like manner Universal Spirit exists
    everywhere. It exists in the tree. It exists in the grass. It
    exists in the ground. It exists in the mountain. It exists in the
    river. It exists in the sea. It exists in the bird. It exists in
    the beast. Thus man is not merely surrounded by Spirit on all sides,
    but it permeates through his whole existence. But he can never be
    Enlightened unless he awakens it within him by means of Meditation.
    To drink water is to drink the universal water; to awaken
    Buddha-nature is to be conscious of Universal Spirit.

    Therefore, to get Enlightened we have to believe that all beings are
    Buddha-natured--that is, absolutely good-natured in the sense that
    transcends the duality of good and bad. "One day," to cite an
    example, "Pan Shan (Ban-zan) happened to pass by a meat-shop. He
    heard a customer saying: 'Give me a pound of fresh meat.' To which
    the shopkeeper, putting down his knife, replied: Certainly, sir.
    Could there be any meat that is not fresh in my shop?' Pan Shan,
    hearing these remarks, was Enlightened at once."

    16. Shakya Muni and the Prodigal Son.

    A great trouble with us is that we do not believe in half the good
    that we are born with. We are just like the only son of a
    well-to-do, as the author of Saddharma-pundarika-sutra[FN#172] tells
    us, who, being forgetful of his rich inheritance, leaves his home and
    leads a life of hand-to-mouth as a coolie. How miserable it is to
    see one, having no faith in his noble endowment, burying the precious
    gem of Buddha-nature into the foul rubbish of vices and crimes,
    wasting his excellent genius in the exertion that is sure to disgrace
    his name, falling a prey to bitter remorse and doubt, and casting
    himself away into the jaw of perdition. Shakya Muni, full of
    fatherly love towards all beings, looked with compassion on us, his
    prodigal son, and used every means to restore the half-starved man to
    his home. It was for this that he left the palace and the beloved
    wife and son, practised his self-mortification and prolonged
    Meditation, attained to Enlightenment, and preached Dharma for
    forty-nine years; in other words, all his strength and effort were
    focussed on that single aim, which was to bring the prodigal son to
    his rich mansion of Buddha-nature. He taught not only by words, but
    by his own actual example, that man has Buddha-nature, by the
    unfoldment of which he can save himself from the miseries of life and
    death, and bring himself to a higher realm than gods. When we are
    Enlightened, or when Universal Spirit awakens within us, we open the
    inexhaustible store of virtues and excellencies, and can freely make
    use of them at our will.

    [FN#172] See 'Sacred Books of the East,' vol. xxi., chap. iv., pp.

    17. The Parable of the Monk and the Stupid Woman.

    The confused or unenlightened may be compared with a monk and a
    stupid woman in a Japanese parable which runs as follows: "One
    evening a monk (who was used to have his head shaved clean), getting
    drunk against the moral precepts, visited a woman, known as a
    blockhead, at her house. No sooner had he got into her room than the
    female fell asleep so soundly that the monk could not wake her nap.
    Thereupon he made up his mind to use every possible means to arouse
    her, and searched and searched all over the room for some instrument
    that would help him in his task of arousing her from death-like
    slumber. Fortunately, he found a razor in one of the drawers of her
    mirror stand. With it he gave a stroke to her hair, but she did not
    stir a whit. Then came another stroke, and she snored like thunder.
    The third and fourth strokes came, but with no better result. And at
    last her head was shaven clean, yet still she slept on. The next
    morning when she awoke, she could not find her visitor, the monk, as
    he had left the house in the previous night. 'Where is my visitor,
    where my dear monk?' she called aloud, and waking in a state of
    somnambulation looked for him in vain, repeating the outcry. When at
    length her hand accidentally touched her shaven head, she mistook it
    for that of her visitor, and exclaimed: 'Here you are, my dear, where
    am I myself gone then?" A great trouble with the confused is their
    forgetting of real self or Buddha-nature, and not knowing 'where it
    is gone.' Duke Ngai, of the State of Lu, once said to Confucius:
    "One of my subjects, Sir, is so much forgetful that he forgot to take
    his wife when be changed his residence." "That is not much, my
    lord," said the sage, "the Emperors Kieh[FN#173] and Cheu[FN#174]
    forgot their own selves."[FN#175]

    [FN#173] The last Emperor of the Ha dynasty, notorious for his
    vices. His reign was 1818-1767 B.C.

    [FN#174] The last Emperor of the Yin dynasty, one of the worst
    despots. His reign was 1154-1122 B.C.

    [FN#175] Ko-shi-ke-go.

    18. 'Each Smile a Hymn, each Kindly Word a Prayer.'

    The glorious sun of Buddha-nature shines in the zenith of Enlightened
    Consciousness, but men still dream a dream of illusion. Bells and
    clocks of the Universal Church proclaim the dawn of Bodhi, yet men,
    drunk with the liquors of the Three Poisons[FN#176] Still slumber in
    the darkness of sin. Let us pray to Buddha, in whose bosom we live,
    for the sake of our own salvation. Let us invoke Buddha, whose
    boundless mercy ever besets us, for the Sake of joy and peace of all
    our fellow-beings. Let us adore Him through our sympathy towards the
    poor, through our kindness shown to the suffering, through our
    thought of the sublime and the good.

    "O brother man, fold to thy heart thy brother;
    Where pity dwells, the peace of God is there;
    To worship rightly is to love each other,
    Each smile a hymn, each kindly word a prayer."

    Let, then, your heart be so pure that you may not be unworthy of the
    sunshine beaming upon you the light of Universal Spirit. Let your
    thought be so noble that you may deserve fair flowers blooming before
    you, reminding you of merciful Buddha. Let your life be so good that
    you may not be ashamed of yourself in the presence of the Blessed
    One. This is the piety of Mahayanists, especially of Zenists.

    [FN#176] Lust, anger, and folly.

    19. The World is in the Making.

    Our assertion is far from assuming that life is now complete, and is
    in its best state. On the contrary, it is full of defects and
    shortcomings. We must not be puffed up with modern civilization,
    however great victory it has scored for its side. Beyond all doubt
    man is still in his cradle. He often stretches forth his hands to
    get at his higher ideal, yet is still satisfied with worthless
    playthings. It is too glaring a fact to be overlooked by us that
    faith in religion is dying out in the educated circles of society,
    that insincerity, cowardice, and double-tongue are found holding high
    positions in almost ever community, that Lucrese and Ezzeling are
    looking down upon the starving multitude from their luxurious palace,
    that Mammon and Bacchus are sometimes preying on their living
    victims, that even religion often sides with Contention and piety
    takes part in Cruelty, that Anarchy is ever ready to spring on the
    crowned beings, that philosophy is disposed to turn the deaf ear to
    the petition of peace, while science provides fuel for the fire of

    Was the golden age of man, then, over in the remote past? Is the
    doomsday coming instead? Do you bear the trumpet call? Do you feel
    the earth tremble? No, absolutely no, the golden age is not passed.
    It is yet to come. There are not a few who think that the world is
    in completion, and the Creator has finished His work. We witness,
    however, that He is still working and working, for actually we hear
    His hammer-strokes resounding through heaven above and earth beneath.
    Does He not show us new materials for His building? Does He not
    give new forms to His design? Does He not surprise us with
    novelties, extraordinaries, and mysteries? In a word, the world is
    in progress, not in retrogression.

    A stream does not run in a straight line. It now turns to the right,
    now to the left, now leaps down a precipice, now waters rich fields,
    now runs back towards its source; but it is destined to find its
    outlet in the ocean. So it is with the stream of life. It now leaps
    down the precipice of revolution. Now it enriches the fertile field
    of civilization. Now it expands itself into a glassy lake of peace.
    Now it forms the dangerous whirlpool of strife. But its course is
    always toward the ocean of Enlightenment, in which the gems of
    equality and freedom, jewels of truth and beauty, and treasures of
    wisdom and bliss can be had.

    20. The Progress and Hope of Life.

    How many myriads of years have passed since the germs of life first
    made appearance on earth none can tell; how many thousands of summers
    and winters it has taken to develop itself into higher animals, no
    scientist can calculate exactly. Slowly but steadily it has taken
    its swerving course, and ascending stop by step the series of
    evolution, has reached at length the plane of the rational animal.
    We cannot tell how many billions of years it takes to develop
    ourselves and become beings higher than man himself, yet we firmly
    believe that it is possible for us to take the same unerring course
    as the organic germs took in the past. Existing humanity is not the
    same as primitive one. It is quite another race. Our desires and
    hopes are entirely different from those of primitive man. What was
    gold for them is now iron for us. Our thoughts and beliefs are what
    they never dreamed of. Of our knowledge they had almost none. That
    which they kept in veneration we trample under our feet. Things they
    worshipped as deities now serve us as our slaves. Things that
    troubled and tortured them we now turn into utilities. To say
    nothing of the customs and manners and mode of living which underwent
    extraordinary change, we are of a race in body and mind other than
    the primitive forefathers of good old days.
    In addition to this we have every reason to believe in the betterment
    of life. Let us cast a glance to the existing state of the world.
    While the Turco-Italian war was raising its ferocious outcry, the
    Chinese revolution lifted its head before the trembling throne. Who
    can tell whether another sanguinary affair will not break out before
    the Bulgarian bloodshed comes to an end? Still we believe that, as
    fire drives out fire, to borrow Shakespeare's phrase, so war is
    driving out war. As an ocean, which separated two nations in the
    past, serves to unite them now, so a war, which separated two people
    in the past, brings them to unity now. It goes without saying, that
    every nation groans under the burden of cannons and warships, and
    heartily desires peace. No nation can willingly wage war against any
    other nation. It is against the national conscience. It is no
    exaggeration to say the world is wholly the ear to hear the news from
    the goddess of peace. A time will surely come, if our purpose be
    steady and our resolution firm, when universal peace will be
    restored, and Shakya Muni's precept, 'not to kill,' will be realized
    by all mankind.

    21. The Betterment of Life.

    Again, people nowadays seem to feel keenly the wound of the
    economical results of war, but they are unfeeling to its moral
    injuries. As elements have their affinities, as bodies have their
    attractions, as creatures have their instinct to live together, so
    men have their inborn mutual love. 'God divided man into men that
    they might help each other.' Their strength lies in their mutual
    help, their pleasure is in their mutual love, and their perfection is
    in their giving and receiving of alternate good. Therefore Shakya
    Muni says: "Be merciful to all living beings." To take up arms
    against any other person is unlawful for any individual. It is the
    violation of the universal law of life.

    We do not deny that there are not a few who are so wretched that they
    rejoice in their crimes, nor that there is any person but has more or
    less stain on his character, nor that the means of committing crimes
    are multiplied in proportion as modern civilization advances; yet
    still we believe that our social life is ever breaking down our
    wolfish disposition that we inherited from our brute ancestors, and
    education is ever wearing out our cannibalistic nature which we have
    in common with wild animals. On the one hand, the signs of social
    morals are manifest in every direction, such as asylums for orphans,
    poorhouses, houses of correction, lodgings for the penniless, asylums
    for the poor, free hospitals, hospitals for domestic animals,
    societies for the prevention of cruelty to animals, schools for the
    blind and the dumb, asylums for the insane, and so forth; on the
    other hand, various discoveries and inventions have been made that
    may contribute to the social improvement, such as the discovery of
    the X rays and of radium, the invention of the wireless telegraph and
    that of the aeroplane and what not. Furthermore, spiritual wonders
    such as clairvoyance, clairaudience, telepathy, etc., remind us of
    the possibilities of further spiritual unfoldment in man which he
    never dreamed of. Thus life is growing richer and nobler step by
    step, and becoming more and more hopeful as we advance in the Way of

    22. The Buddha of Mercy.

    Milton says:

    "Virtue may be assailed, but never hurt;
    Surprised by unjust force, but not enthralled.
    But evil on itself shall back recoil,
    And mix no more with goodness. If this fail,
    The pillared firmament is rottenness,
    And earth's base built on stubble."

    The world is built on the foundation of morality, which is another
    name for Universal Spirit, and moral order sustains it. We human
    beings, consciously or unconsciously, were, are, and will be at work
    to bring the world into perfection. This idea is allegorically
    expressed in the Buddhist sutra,[FN#177] which details the advent of
    a merciful Buddha named Maitreya in the remote future. At that time,
    it says, there will be no steep hills, no filthy places, no epidemic,
    no famine, no earthquake, no storm, no war, no revolution, no
    bloodshed, no cruelty, and no suffering; the roads will be paved
    smoothly, grass and trees always blooming, birds ever singing, men
    contented and happy; all sentient beings will worship the Buddha of
    Mercy, accept His doctrine, and attain to Enlightenment. This
    prophecy will be fulfilled, according to the sutra, 5,670,000,000
    years after the death of Shakya Muni. This evidently shows us that
    the Mahayanist's aim of life is to bring out man's inborn light of
    Buddha-nature to illumine the world, to realize the universal
    brotherhood of all sentient beings, to attain to Enlightenment, and
    to enjoy peace and joy to which Universal Spirit leads us.

    [FN#177] See Nanjo's Catalogue, Nos. 204-209.



    1. Enlightenment is beyond Description and Analysis.

    In the foregoing chapters we have had several occasions to refer to
    the central problem of Zen or Enlightenment, whose content it is
    futile to attempt to explain or analyze. We must not explain or
    analyze it, because by doing so we cannot but mislead the reader. We
    can as well represent Enlightenment by means of explanation or
    analysis as we do personality by snapshots or by anatomical
    operations. As our inner life, directly experienced within us, is
    anything but the shape of the head, or the features of the face, or
    the posture of the body, so Enlightenment experienced by Zenists at
    the moment of their highest Samadhi[FN#178] is anything but the
    psychological analysis of mental process, or the epistemological
    explanation of cognition, or the philosophical generalization of
    concepts. Enlightenment can be realized only by the Enlightened, and
    baffles every attempt to describe it, even by the Enlightened
    themselves. The effort of the confused to guess at Enlightenment is
    often likened by the Zenists to the effort of the blind who feel an
    elephant to know what it looks like. Some of them who happen to feel
    the trunk would declare it is like a rope, but those who happen to
    feel the belly would declare it is like a huge drum; while those who
    happen to feel the feet would declare it is like the trunk of a tree.
    But none of these conjectures can approach the living elephant.

    [FN#178] Abstract Contemplation, which the Zenists distinguish from
    Samadhi, practised by the Brahmins. The author of 'An Outline of
    Buddhist Sects' points out the distinction, saying: "Contemplation of
    outside religionists is practised with the heterodox view that the
    lower worlds (the worlds for men, beasts, etc.) are disgusting, but
    the upper worlds (the worlds for Devas) are desirable; Contemplation
    of common people (ordinary lay believers of Buddhism) is practised
    with the belief in the law of Karma, and also with disgust (for the
    lower worlds) and desire (for the upper worlds); Contemplation of
    Hinayana is practised with an insight into the truth of Anatman
    (non-soul); Contemplation of Mahayana is practised with an insight of
    Unreality of Atman (soul) as well as of Dharma (thing); Contemplation
    of the highest perfection is practised with the view that Mind is
    pure in its nature, it is endowed with unpolluted wisdom, free from
    passion, and it is no other than Buddha himself."

    2. Enlightenment implies an Insight into the Nature of Self.

    We cannot pass over, however, this weighty problem without saying a
    word. We shall try in this chapter to present Enlightenment before
    the reader in a roundabout way, just as the painter gives the
    fragmentary sketches of a beautiful city, being unable to give even a
    bird's-eye view of it. Enlightenment, first of all, implies an
    insight into the nature of Self. It is an emancipation of mind from
    illusion concerning Self. All kinds of sin take root deep in the
    misconception of Self, and putting forth the branches of lust, anger,
    and folly, throw dark shadows on life. To extirpate this
    misconception Buddhism[FN#179] strongly denies the existence of the
    individual soul as conceived by common sense-that is, that unchanging
    spiritual entity provided with sight, hearing, touch, smell, feeling,
    thought, imagination, aspiration, etc., which survives the body. It
    teaches us that there is no such thing as soul, and that the notion
    of soul is a gross illusion. It treats of body as a temporal
    material form of life doomed to be destroyed by death and reduced to
    its elements again. It maintains that mind is also a temporal
    spiritual form of life, behind which there is no immutable soul.

    [FN#179] Both Mahayana and Hinayana Buddhism teach the doctrine of
    Anatman, or Non-self. It is the denial of soul as conceived by
    common sense, and of Atman as conceived by Indian heterodox thinkers.
    Some Mahayanists believe in the existence of real Self instead of
    individual self, as we see in Mahaparinirvana-sutra, whose author
    says: "There is real self in non-self." It is worthy of note that
    the Hinayanists set forth Purity, Pleasure, Atman, and Eternity, as
    the four great misconceptions about life, while the same author
    regards them as the four great attributes of Nirvana itself.

    An illusory mind tends either to regard body as Self and to yearn
    after its material interests, or to believe mind dependent on soul as
    Ego. Those who are given to sensual pleasures, consciously or
    unconsciously, bold body to be the Self, and remain the life-long
    slave to the objects of sense. Those who regard mind as dependent on
    soul as the Self, on the other hand, undervalue body as a mere tool
    with which the soul works, and are inclined to denounce life as if
    unworthy of living. We must not undervalue body, nor must we
    overestimate mind. There is no mind isolated from body, nor is there
    any body separated from mind. Every activity of mind produces
    chemical and physiological changes in the nerve-centres, in the
    organs, and eventually in the whole body; while every activity of
    body is sure to bring out the corresponding change in the mental
    function, and eventually in the whole personality. We have the
    inward experience of sorrow when we have simultaneously the outward
    appearance of tears and of pallor; when we have the outward
    appearance of the fiery eyes and short breath, we have simultaneously
    the inward feeling of anger. Thus body is mind observed outwardly in
    its relation to the senses; mind is body inwardly experienced in its
    relation to introspection. Who can draw a strict line of demarcation
    between mind and body? We should admit, so far as our present
    knowledge is concerned, that mind, the intangible, has been formed to
    don a garment of matter in order to become an intelligible existence
    at all; matter, the solid, has faded under examination into
    formlessness, as that of mind. Zen believes in the identification of
    mind and body, as Do-gen[FN#180] says: "Body is identical with mind;
    appearance and reality are one and the same thing."
    Bergson denies the identification of mind and body, saying:[FN#181]
    "It (experience) shows us the interdependence of the mental and the
    physical, the necessity of a certain cerebral substratum for the
    psychical state-nothing more. From the fact that two things are
    mutually dependent, it does not follow that they are equivalent.
    Because a certain screw is necessary for a certain machine, because
    the machine works when the screw is there and stops when the screw is
    taken away, we do not say that the screw is equivalent of the
    machine." Bergson's simile of a screw and a machine is quite
    inadequate to show the interdependence of mind and body, because the
    screw does cause the machine to work, but the machine does not cause
    the screw to work; so that their relation is not interdependence. On
    the contrary, body causes mind to work, and at the same time mind
    causes body to work; so that their relation is perfectly
    interdependent, and the relation is not that of an addition of mind
    to body, or of body to mind, as the screw is added to the machine.
    Bergson must have compared the working of the machine with mind, and
    the machine itself with body, if be wanted to show the real fact.
    Moreover, he is not right in asserting that "from the fact that two
    things are mutually dependent, it does not follow that they are
    equivalent," because there are several kinds of interdependence, in
    some of which two things can be equivalent. For instance, bricks,
    mutually dependent in their forming an arch, cannot be equivalent one
    with another; but water and waves, being mutually dependent, can be
    identified. In like manner fire and heat, air and wind, a machine
    and its working, mind and body.[FN#182]

    [FN#180] The master strongly condemns the immortality of the soul as
    the heterodox doctrine in his Sho-bo-gen-zo. The same argument is
    found in Mu-chu-mon-do, by Mu-so Koku-shi.

    [FN#181] 'Creative Evolution,' pp. 354, 355.

    [FN#182] Bergson, arguing against the dependence of the mind on
    brain, says: "That there is a close connection between a state of
    consciousness and the brain we do not dispute. But there is also a
    close connection between a coat and the nail on which it hangs, for
    if the nail is pulled out, the coat will fall to the ground. Shall
    we say, then, that the shape of the nail gave the shape of the coat,
    or in any way corresponds to it? No more are we entitled to
    conclude, because the psychical fact is hung on to a cerebral state,
    that there is any parallelism between the two series, psychical and
    physiological." We have to ask, in what respects does the
    interrelation between mind and body resemble the relation between a
    coat and a nail?

    3. The Irrationality of the Belief of Immortality.

    Occidental minds believe in a mysterious entity under the name of
    soul, just as Indian thinkers believe in the so-called subtle body
    entirely distinct from the gross body of flesh and blood. Soul,
    according to this belief, is an active principle that unites body and
    mind so as to form an harmonious whole of mental as well as bodily
    activities. And it acts through the instrumentality of the mind and
    body in the present life, and enjoys an eternal life beyond the
    grave. It is on this soul that individual immortality is based. It
    is immortal Self.
    Now, to say nothing of the origin of soul, this long-entertained
    belief is hardly good for anything. In the first place, it throws no
    light upon the relation of mind and body, because soul is an empty
    name for the unity of mind and body, and serves to explain nothing.
    On the contrary, it adds another mystery to the already mysterious
    relationships between matter and spirit. Secondly, soul should be
    conceived as a psychical individual, subject to spacial
    determinations--but since it has to be deprived by death of its body
    which individualizes it, it will cease to be individuality after
    death, to the disappointment of the believer. How could you think
    anything purely spiritual and formless existing without blending
    together with other things? Thirdly, it fails to gratify the desire,
    cherished by the believer, of enjoying eternal life, because soul has
    to lose its body, the sole important medium through which it may
    enjoy life. Fourthly, soul is taken as a subject matter to receive
    in the future life the reward or the punishment from God for our
    actions in this life; but the very idea of eternal punishment is
    inconsistent with the boundless love of God. Fifthly, it is beyond
    all doubt that soul is conceived as an entity, which unifies various
    mental faculties and exists as the foundation of individual
    personality. But the existence of such soul is quite incompatible
    with the well-known pathological fact that it is possible for the
    individual to have double or treble or multiple personalities. Thus
    the belief in the existence of soul conceived by the common sense
    turns out not only to be irrational, but a useless encumbrance on the
    religious mind. Therefore Zen declares that there is no such thing
    as soul, and that mind and body are one. Hwui Chung (Ye-chu), a
    famous disciple of the Sixth Patriarch in China, to quote an example,
    one day asked a monk: "Where did you come from?" "I came, sir, from
    the South," replied the man. "What doctrine do the masters of the
    South teach?" asked Hwui Chung again. "They teach, sir, that body is
    mortal, but mind is immortal," was the answer. "That," said the
    master, "is the heterodox doctrine of the Atman!" "How do you, sir,"
    questioned the monk, "teach about that?" "I teach that the body and
    mind are one," was the reply.[FN#183]

    [FN#183] For further explanation, see Sho-bo-gen-zo and

    Fiske, [FN#184] in his argument against materialism, blames the
    denial of immortality, saying: "The materialistic assumption that
    there is no such state of things, and that the life of the soul ends
    accordingly with the life of the body, is perhaps the most colossal
    instance of baseless assumption that is known to the history of
    philosophy." But we can say with equal force that the common-sense
    assumption that the life of soul continues beyond the grave is,
    perhaps, the most colossal instance of baseless assumption that is
    known to the history of thought, because, there being no scientific
    evidences that give countenance to the assumption, even the
    spiritualists themselves hesitate to assert the existence of a ghost
    or soul. Again he[FN#185] says: "With this illegitimate hypothesis
    of annihilation the materialist transgresses the bounds of experience
    quite as widely as the poet who sings of the New Jerusalem with its
    river of life and its street of gold. Scientifically speaking, there
    is not a particle of evidence for either view." This is as much as
    to say there is not a particle of evidence, scientifically speaking,
    for the common-sense view of soul, because the poet's description of
    the New Jerusalem is nothing but the result of the common-sense
    belief of immortality.

    [FN#184] 'The Destiny of Man,' p. 110.

    [FN#185] 'The Destiny of Man,' pp. 110, 111.

    4. The Examination of the Notion of Self.

    The belief in immortality is based on the strong instinct of
    self-preservation that calls forth an insatiable longing for
    longevity. It is another form of egoism, one of the relics of our
    brute forefathers. We must bear in mind that this illusion of the
    individual Self is the foundation on which every form of immorality
    has its being. I challenge my readers to find in the whole history
    of mankind any crime not based on egoism. Evil-doers have been as a
    rule pleasure-hunters, money-seekers, seekers after self-interests,
    characterized by lust, folly, and cruelty. Has there been anyone who
    committed theft that he might further the interests of his villagers?
    Has there been any paramour who disgraced himself that lie might
    help his neighbours? Has there been any traitor who performed the
    ignoble conduct to promote the welfare of his own country or society
    at large?

    To get Enlightened, therefore, we have to correct, first of all, our
    notions concerning Self. Individual body and mind are not the only
    important constituents of Self. There are many other indispensable
    elements in the notion of Self. For instance, I have come into
    existence as another form of my parents. I am theirs, and may justly
    be called the reincarnation of them. And again, my father is another
    form of his parents; my mother of hers; his and her parents of
    theirs; and ad infinitum. In brief, all my forefathers live and have
    their being in me. I cannot help, therefore, thinking that my
    physical state is the result of the sum total of my good and bad
    actions in the past lives I led in the persons of my forefathers, and
    of the influence I received therein;[FN#186] and that my psychical
    state is the result of that which I received, felt, imagined,
    conceived, experienced, and thought in my past existences in the
    persons of my ancestors.

    [FN#186] This is the law of Karma.

    Besides this, my brothers, my sisters, my neighbours--nay, all my
    follow-men and fellow-women are no other than the reincarnation of
    their parents and forefathers, who are also mine. The same blood
    invigorated the king as well as the beggar; the same nerve energized
    the white as well as the black men; the same consciousness vitalized
    the wise as well as the unwise. Impossible it is to conceive myself
    independent of my fellow-men and fellow-women, for they are mine and
    I am theirs--that is, I live and move in them, and they live and move
    in me.

    It is bare nonsense to say that I go to school, not to be educated as
    a member of society, but simply to gratify my individual desire for
    knowledge; or that I make a fortune, not to lead the life of a
    well-to-do in society, but to satisfy my individual money-loving
    instinct; or that I seek after truth, neither to do good to my
    contemporaries nor to the future generations, but only for my
    individual curiosity or that I live neither to live with my family
    nor with my friends nor with anyone else, but to live my individual
    life. It is as gross absurdity to say that I am an individual
    absolutely independent of society as to say I am a husband with no
    wife, or I am a son to no parents. Whatever I do directly or
    indirectly I contribute to the common fortune of man; whatever anyone
    else does directly or indirectly determines my fate. Therefore we
    must realize that our Selves necessarily include other members of the
    community, while other members' Selves necessarily comprehend us.

    5. Nature is the Mother of All Things.

    Furthermore, man has come into existence out of Nature. He is her
    child. She provided him food, raiment, and shelter. She nourishes
    him, strengthens him, and vitalizes him. At the same time she
    disciplines, punishes, and instructs him. His body is of her own
    formation, his knowledge is of her own laws, and his activities are
    the responses to her own addresses to him. Modern civilization is
    said by some to be the conquest of man over Nature; but, in fact, it
    is his faithful obedience to her. "Bacon truly said," says
    Eucken,[FN#187] "that to rule nature man must first serve her. He
    forgot to add that, as her ruler, he is still destined to go on
    serving her." She can never be attacked by any being unless he acts
    in strict conformity to her laws. To accomplish anything against her
    law is as impossible as to catch fishes in a forest, or to make bread
    of rock. How many species of animals have perished owing to their
    inability to follow her steps! How immense fortunes have been lost
    in vain from man's ignorance of her order! How many human beings
    disappeared on earth from their disobedience to her unbending will!
    She is, nevertheless, true to those who obey her rules. Has not
    science proved that she is truthful? Has not art found that she is

    [FN#187] Eucken's 'Philosophy of Life,' by W. R. Royce Gibbon, p. 51.

    Has not philosophy announced that she is spiritual? Has not religion
    proclaimed that she is good? At all events, she is the mother of all
    beings. She lives in all things and they live in her. All that she
    possesses is theirs, and all that they want she supplies. Her life
    is the same vitality that stirs all sentient beings. Chwang
    Tsz[FN#188] (So-shi) is right when he says: "Heaven, Earth, and I
    were produced together, and all things and I are one." And again:
    "If all things be regarded with love, Heaven and Earth are one with
    me." Sang Chao (So-jo) also says: "Heaven and Earth are of the same
    root as we. All things in the world are of one substance with

    [FN#188] Chwang Tsz, vol. i., p. 20.

    [FN#189] This is a favourite subject of discussion by Zenists.

    6. Real Self.

    If there be no individual soul either in mind or body, where does
    personality lie? What is Real Self? How does it differ from soul?
    Self is living entity, not immutable like soul, but mutable and
    ever-changing life, which is body when observed by senses, and which
    is mind when experienced by introspection. It is not an entity lying
    behind mind and body, but life existent as the union of body and
    mind. It existed in our forefathers in the past, is existing in the
    present, and will exist in the future generations. It also discloses
    itself to some measure in vegetables and animals, and shadows itself
    forth in inorganic nature. It is Cosmic life and Cosmic spirit, and
    at the same time individual life and individual spirit. It is one
    and the same life which embraces men and nature. It is the
    self-existent, creative, universal principle that moves on from
    eternity to eternity. As such it is called Mind or Self by Zenists.
    Pan Shan (Ban-zan) says: "The moon of mind comprehends all the
    universe in its light." A man asked Chang Sha (Cho-sha): "How can
    you turn the phenomenal universe into Self ?" "How can you turn Self
    into the phenomenal universe?" returned the master.

    When we get the insight into this Self, we are able to have the open
    sesame to the mysteries of the universe, because to know the nature
    of a drop of water is to know the nature of the river, the lake, and
    the ocean--nay, even of vapour, mist, and cloud; in other words, to
    get an insight into individual life is the key to the secret of
    Universal Life. We must not confine Self within the poor little
    person called body. That is the root of the poorest and most
    miserable egoism. We should expand that egoism into family-egoism,
    then into nation-egoism, then into race-egoism, then into
    human-egoism, then into living-being-egoism, and lastly into
    universe-egoism, which is not egoism at all. Thus we deny the
    immortality of soul as conceived by common sense, but assume
    immortality of the Great Soul, which animates, vitalizes, and
    spiritualizes all sentient beings. It is Hinayana Buddhism that
    first denied the existence of atman or Self so emphatically
    inculcated in the Upanisads, and paved the way for the general
    conception of Universal Self, with the eulogies of which almost every
    page of Mahayana books is filled.

    7. The Awakening of the Innermost Wisdom.

    Having set ourselves free from the misconception of Self, next we
    must awaken our innermost wisdom, pure and divine, called the Mind of
    Buddha,[FN#190] or Bodhi,[FN#191] or Prajnya[FN#192] by Zen masters.
    It is the divine light, the inner heaven, the key to all moral
    treasures, the centre of thought and consciousness, the source of all
    influence and power, the seat of kindness, justice, sympathy,
    impartial love, humanity, and mercy, the measure of all things. When
    this innermost wisdom is fully awakened, we are able to realize that
    each and everyone of us is identical in spirit, in essence, in nature
    with the universal life or Buddha, that each ever lives face to face
    with Buddha, that each is beset by the abundant grace of the Blessed
    One, that He arouses his moral nature, that He opens his spiritual
    eyes, that He unfolds his new capacity, that He appoints his mission,
    and that life is not an ocean of birth, disease, old age, and death,
    nor the vale of tears, but the holy temple of Buddha, the Pure
    Land,[FN#193] where be can enjoy the bliss of Nirvana.

    [FN#190] Zen is often called the Sect of Buddha-mind, as it lays
    stress on the awakening of the Mind of Buddha. The words 'the Mind
    of Buddha' were taken from a passage in Lankavatara-sutra.

    [FN#191] That knowledge by which one becomes enlightened.

    [FN#192] Supreme wisdom.

    [FN#193] Sukhavati, or the land of bliss.

    Then our minds go through an entire revolution. We are no more
    troubled by anger and hatred, no more bitten by envy and ambition, no
    more stung by sorrow and chagrin, no more overwhelmed by melancholy
    and despair. Not that we become passionless or simply intellectual,
    but that we have purified passions, which, instead of troubling us,
    inspire us with noble aspirations, such as anger and hatred against
    injustice, cruelty, and dishonesty, sorrow and lamentation for human
    frailty, mirth and joy for the welfare of follow-beings, pity and
    sympathy for suffering creatures. The same change purifies our
    intellect. Scepticism and sophistry give way to firm conviction;
    criticism and hypothesis to right judgment; and inference and
    argument to realization.

    What we merely observed before we now touch with heart as well. What
    we knew in relation of difference before we now understand in
    relation of unity as well. How things happen was our chief concern
    before, but now we consider as well bow much value they have. What
    was outside us before now comes within us. What was dead and
    indifferent before grows now alive and lovable to us. What was
    insignificant and empty before becomes now important, and has
    profound meaning. Wherever we go we find beauty; whomever we meet we
    find good; whatever we get we receive with gratitude. This is the
    reason why the Zenists not only regarded all their fellow-beings as
    their benefactors, but felt gratitude even towards fuel and water.
    The present writer knows a contemporary Zenist who would not drink
    even a cup of water without first making a salutation to it. Such an
    attitude of Zen toward things may well be illustrated by the
    following example: Sueh Fung (Sep-po) and Kin Shan (Kin-zan), once
    travelling through a mountainous district, saw a leaf of the rape
    floating down the stream. Thereon Kin Shan said: "Let us go up, dear
    brother, along the stream that we may find a sage living up on the
    mountain. I hope we shall find a good teacher in him." "No,"
    replied Sueh Fung, "for he cannot be a sage who wastes even a leaf of
    the rape. He will be no good teacher for us."

    8. Zen is not Nihilistic.

    Zen judged from ancient Zen masters' aphorisms may seem, at the first
    sight, to be idealistic in an extreme form, as they say: "Mind is
    Buddha" or, "Buddha is Mind," or, "There is nothing outside mind,"
    or, "Three worlds are of but one mind." And it may also appear to be
    nihilistic, as they say: "There has been nothing since all eternity,"
    "By illusion you see the castle of the Three Worlds"; "by
    Enlightenment you see but emptiness in ten directions."[FN#194] In
    reality, however, Zen[FN#195] is neither idealistic nor nihilistic.
    Zen makes use of the nihilistic idea of Hinayana Buddhism, and calls
    its students' attention to the change and evanescence of life and of
    the world, first to destroy the error of immutation, next to dispel
    the attachment to the sensual objects.

    [FN#194] These words were repeatedly uttered by Chinese and Japanese
    Zenists of all ages. Chwen Hih (Fu-dai-shi) expressed this very idea
    in his Sin Wang Ming (Shin-o-mei) at the time of Bodhidharma.

    [FN#195] The Rin-zai teachers mostly make use of the doctrine of
    unreality of all things, as taught in Prajnya-paramita-sutras. We
    have to note that there are some differences between the Mahayana
    doctrine of unreality and the Hinayana doctrine of unreality.

    It is a misleading tendency of our intellect to conceive things as if
    they were immutable and constant. It often leaves changing and
    concrete individual objects out of consideration, and lays stress on
    the general, abstract, unchanging aspect of things. It is inclined
    to be given to generalization and abstraction. It often looks not at
    this thing or at that thing, but at things in general. It loves to
    think not of a good thing nor of a bad thing, but of bad and good in
    the abstract. This intellectual tendency hardens and petrifies the
    living and growing world, and leads us to take the universe as a
    thing dead, inert, and standing still. This error of immutation can
    be corrected by the doctrine of Transcience taught by Hinayana
    Buddhism. But as medicine taken in an undue quantity turns into
    poison, so the doctrine of Transcience drove the Hinayanists to the
    suicidal conclusion of nihilism. A well-known scholar and believer
    of Zen, Kwei Fung (Kei-ha) says in his refutation of nihilism:[FN#196]

    "If mind as well as external objects be unreal, who is it that knows
    they are so? Again, if there be nothing real in the universe, what
    is it that causes unreal objects to appear? We stand witness to the
    fact that there is no one of the unreal things on earth that is not
    made to appear by something real. If there be no water of unchanging
    fluidity, how can there be the unreal and temporary forms of waves?
    If there be no unchanging mirror, bright and clean, bow can there be
    the various images, unreal and temporary, reflected in it? If mind
    as well as external objects be nothing at all, no one can tell what
    it is that causes these unreal appearances. Therefore this doctrine
    (of the unreality of all things) can never clearly disclose spiritual
    Reality. So that Mahabheri-harakaparivarta-sutra says: " All the
    sutras that teach the unreality of things belong to the imperfect
    doctrine " (of the Shakya Muni). Mahaprajnya-paramita-sutra says The
    doctrine of unreality is the entrance-gate of Mahayana."

    [FN#196] See the appendix, chap. ii., 'The Mahayana Doctrine of

    9. Zen and Idealism.

    Next Zen makes use of Idealism as explained by the Dharmalaksana
    School of Mahayana Buddhism.[FN#197] For instance, the Fourth
    Patriarch says: "Hundreds and thousands of laws originate with mind.
    Innumerable mysterious virtues proceed from the mental source." Niu
    Teu (Go-zu) also says: "When mind arises, various things arise; when
    mind ceases to exist, various things cease to exist." Tsao Shan
    (So-zan) carried the point so far that he cried out, on hearing the
    bell: "It hurts, it pains." Then an attendant of his asked "What is
    the matter?" "It is my mind," said he, that is struck."[FN#198]

    [FN#197] Appendix, chap. ii., 'The Mahayana Doctrine of

    [FN#198] Zen-rin-rui-shu.

    We acknowledge the truth of the following considerations: There
    exists no colour, nor sound, nor odour in the objective world, but
    there are the vibrations of ether, or the undulations of the air, or
    the stimuli of the sensory nerves of smell. Colour is nothing but
    the translation of the stimuli into sensation by the optical nerves,
    so also sounds by the auditory, and odours by the smelling.
    Therefore nothing exists objectively exactly as it is perceived by
    the senses, but all are subjective. Take electricity, for example,
    it appears as light when perceived through the eye; it appears as
    sound when perceived through the ear; it appears as taste when
    perceived through the tongue; but electricity in reality is not
    light, nor sound, nor taste. Similarly, the mountain is not high nor
    low; the river is not deep nor shallow; the house is not large nor
    small; the day is not long nor short; but they seem so through
    comparison. It is not objective reality that displays the phenomenal
    universe before us, but it is our mind that plays an important part.
    Suppose that we have but one sense organ, the eye, then the whole
    universe should consist of colours and of colours only. If we
    suppose we were endowed with the sixth sense, which entirely
    contradicts our five senses, then the whole world would be otherwise.
    Besides, it is our reason that finds the law of cause and effect in
    the objective world, that discovered the law of uniformity in Nature,
    and that discloses scientific laws in the universe so as to form a
    cosmos. Some scholars maintain that we cannot think of non-existence
    of space, even if we can leave out all objects in it; nor can we
    doubt the existence of time, for the existence of mind itself
    presupposes time. Their very argument, however, proves the
    subjectivity of time and space, because, if they were objective, we
    should be able to think them non-existent, as we do with other
    external objects. Even space and time, therefore are no more than

    10. Idealism is a Potent Medicine for Self-created Mental Disease.

    In so far as Buddhist idealism refers to the world of sense, in so
    far as it does not assume that to to be known is identical with to
    be, in so far as it does not assert that the phenomenal universe is a
    dream and a vision, we may admit it as true. On the one hand, it
    serves us as a purifier of our hearts polluted with materialistic
    desires, and uplifts us above the plain of sensualism; on the other
    hand, it destroys superstitions which as a rule arise from ignorance
    and want of the idealistic conception of things.
    It is a lamentable fact that every country is full of such
    superstitions people as described by one of the New Thought writers:
    'Tens of thousands of women in this country believe that if two
    people look in a mirror at the same time, or if one thanks the other
    for a pin, or if one gives a knife or a sharp instrument to a friend,
    it will break up friendship. If a young lady is presented with a
    thimble, she will be an old maid. Some people think that after
    leaving a house it is unlucky to go back after any article which has
    been forgotten, and, if one is obliged to do so, one should sit down
    in a chair before going out again; that if a broom touches a person
    while someone is sweeping, bad luck will follow; and that it is
    unlucky to change one's place at a table. A man took an opal to a
    New York jeweller and asked him to buy it. He said that it had
    brought him nothing but bad luck, that since it had come into his
    possession he had failed in business, that there bad been much
    sickness in his family, and all sorts of misfortune had befallen him.
    He refused to keep the cursed thing any longer. The jeweller
    examined the stone, and found that it was not an opal after all, but
    an imitation.'

    Idealism is a most potent medicine for these self-created mental
    diseases. It will successfully drive away devils and spirits that
    frequent ignorant minds, just as Jesus did in the old days. Zen
    makes use of moral idealism to extirpate, root and branch, all such
    idle dreams and phantasmagoria of illusion and opens the way to

    11. Idealistic Scepticism concerning Objective Reality.

    But extreme Idealism identifies 'to be' with 'to be known,' and
    assumes all phenomena to be ideas as illustrated in
    Mahayana-vidyamatra-siddhi-tridaca-castra[FN#199] and
    Vidyamatra-vincati-castra,[FN#200] by Vasubandhu. Then it
    necessarily parts company with Zen, which believes in Universal Life
    existing in everything instead of behind it. Idealism shows us its
    dark side in three sceptic views: (1) scepticism respecting objective
    reality; (2) scepticism respecting religion; (3) scepticism
    respecting morality.

    [FN#199] A philosophical work on Buddhist idealism by Vasubandhu,
    translated into Chinese by Hiuen Tsang in A.D. 648. There exists a
    famous commentary on it, compiled by Dharmapala, translated into
    Chinese by Hiuen Tsang in A.D. 659. See Nanjo's Catalogue, Nos. 1197
    and 1125.

    [FN#200] A simpler work on Idealism, translated into Chinese by
    Hiuen Tsang in A.D. 661. See Nanjo's Catalogue, Nos. 1238, 1239, and

    First it assumes that things exist in so far as they are known by us.
    It is as a matter of course that if a tree exists at all, it is
    known as having a trunk long or short, branches large or small,
    leaves green or yellow, flowers yellow or purple, etc., all of which
    are ideas. But it does not imply in the least that 'to be known' is
    equivalent to 'to be existent.' Rather we should say that to be
    known presupposes to be existent, for we cannot know anything
    non-existent, even if we admit that the axioms of logic subsist.
    Again, a tree may stand as ideas to a knower, but it can stand at the
    same time as a shelter in relation to some birds, as food in relation
    to some insects, as a world in relation to some minute worms, as a
    kindred organism to other vegetables. How could you say that its
    relation to a knower is the only and fundamental relation for the
    existence of the tree? The disappearance of its knower no more
    affects the tree than of its feeder; nor the appearance of its knower
    affects the tree any more than that of kindred vegetables.

    Extreme idealism erroneously concludes that what is really existent,
    or what is directly proved to be existent, is only our sensations,
    ideas, thoughts; that the external world is nothing but the images
    reflected on the mirror of the mind, and that therefore objective
    reality of things is doubtful-nay, more, they are unreal, illusory,
    and dreams. If so, we can no longer distinguish the real from the
    visionary; the waking from the dreaming; the sane from the insane;
    the true from the untrue. Whether life is real or an empty dream, we
    are at a loss to understand.

    12. Idealistic Scepticism concerning Religion and Morality.

    Similarly, it is the case with religion and morality. If we admit
    extreme idealism as true, there can be nothing objectively real. God
    is little more than a mental image. He must be a creature of mind
    instead of a Creator. He has no objective reality. He is when we
    think He is. He is not when we think He is not. He is at the mercy
    of our thought. How much more unreal the world must be, which is
    supposed to have been created by an unreal God! Providence,
    salvation, and divine grace--what are they? A bare dream dreamed in
    a dream!

    What is morality, then? It is subjective. It has no objective
    validity. A moral conduct highly valued by our fathers is now held
    to be immoral by us. Immoral acts now strongly denounced by us may
    be regarded as moral by our posterity. Good deeds of the savage are
    not necessarily good in the eyes of the civilized, nor evil acts of
    the Orientals are necessarily evil before the face of the
    Occidentals. It follows, then, that there is no definite standard of
    morality in any place at any time.

    If morality be merely subjective, and there be no objective standard,
    how can you distinguish evil from good? How can you single out
    angels from among devils? Was not Socrates a criminal? Was not
    Jesus also a criminal? How could you know Him to be a Divine man
    different from other criminals who were crucified with Him? What you
    honour may I not denounce as disgrace? What you hold as duty may I
    not condemn as sin? Every form of idealism is doomed, after all, to
    end in such confusion and scepticism. We cannot embrace radical
    idealism, which holds these threefold sceptical views in her womb.

    13. An Illusion concerning Appearance and Reality.

    To get Enlightened we must next dispel an illusion respecting
    appearance and reality. According. to certain religionists, all the
    phenomena of the universe are to succumb to change. Worldly things
    one and all are evanescent. They are nought in the long run.
    Snowcapped mountains may sink into the bottom of the deep, while the
    sands in the fathomless ocean may soar into the azure sky at some
    time or other. Blooming flowers are destined to fade and to bloom
    again in the next year. So destined are growing trees, rising
    generations, prospering nations, glowing suns, moons, and stars.
    This, they would say, is only the case with phenomena or appearances,
    but not with reality. Growth and decay, birth and death, rise and
    fall, all these are the ebb and flow of appearances in the ocean of
    reality, which is always the same. Flowers may fade and be reduced
    to dust, yet out of that dust come flowers. Trees may die out, yet
    they are reproduced somewhere else. The time may come when the earth
    will become a dead sphere quite unsuitable for human habitation, and
    the whole of mankind will perish; yet who knows that whether another
    earth may not be produced as man's home? The sun might have its
    beginning and end, stars, moons, theirs as well; yet an infinite
    universe would have no beginning nor end.

    Again, they say, mutation is of the world of sense or phenomenal
    appearances, but not of reality. The former are the phases of the
    latter shown to our senses. Accordingly they are always limited and
    modified by our senses, just as images are always limited and
    modified by the mirror in which they are reflected. On this account
    appearances are subject to limitations, while reality is limitless.
    And it follows that the former are imperfect, while the latter is
    perfect; that the former is transient, while the latter is eternal;
    that the former is relative, while the latter is absolute; that the
    former is worldly, while the latter is holy; that the former is
    knowable, while the latter is unknowable.

    These considerations naturally lead us to an assertion that the world
    of appearances is valueless, as it is limited, short-lived,
    imperfect, painful, sinful, hopeless, and miserable; while the realm
    of reality is to be aspired for, as it is eternal, perfect,
    comfortable, full of hope, joy, and peace-hence the eternal divorce
    of appearance and reality. Such a view of life tends to make one
    minimize the value of man, to neglect the present existence, and to
    yearn after the future.

    Some religionists tell us that we men are helpless, sinful, hopeless,
    and miserable creatures. Worldly riches, temporal honours, and
    social positions-nay, even sublimities and beauties of the present
    existence, are to be ignored and despised. We have no need of caring
    for those things that pass away in a twinkling moment. We must
    prepare for the future life which is eternal. We must accumulate
    wealth for that existence. We must endeavour to hold rank in it. We
    must aspire for the sublimity and beauty and glory of that realm.

    14. Where does the Root of the Illusion Lie?

    Now let us examine where illusion lies hidden from the view of these
    religionists. It lies deeply rooted in the misconstruction of
    reality, grows up into the illusive ideas of appearances, and throws
    its dark shadow on life. The most fundamental error lies in their
    construing reality as something unknowable existing behind

    According to their opinion, all that we know, or perceive, or feel,
    or imagine about the world, is appearances or phenomena, but not
    reality itself. Appearances are 'things known as,' but not 'things
    as they are.' Thing-in-itself, or reality, lies behind appearances
    permanently beyond our ken. This is probably the most profound
    metaphysical pit into which philosophical minds have ever fallen in
    their way of speculation. Things appear, they would say, as we see
    them through our limited senses; but they must present entirely
    different aspects to those that differ from ours, just as the
    vibration of ether appears to us as colours, yet it presents quite
    different aspects to the colour-blind or to the purblind. The
    phenomenal universe is what appears to the human mind, and in case
    our mental constitution undergoes change, it would be completely

    This argument, however, is far from proving that the reality is
    unknowable, or that it lies hidden behind appearances or
    presentations. Take, for instance, a reality which appears as a ray
    of the sun. When it goes through a pane of glass it appears to be
    colourless, but it exhibits a beautiful spectrum when it passes
    through a prism. Therefore you assume that a reality appearing as
    the rays of the sun is neither colourless nor coloured in itself,
    since these appearances are wholly due to the difference that obtains
    between the pane of glass and the prism.

    We contend, however, that the fact does not prove the existence of
    the reality named the sun's ray beyond or behind the white light, nor
    its existence beyond or behind the spectrum. It is evident that the
    reality exists in white light, and that it is known as the white
    light when it goes through a pane of glass; and that the same reality
    exists in the spectrum, and is known as the spectrum when it goes
    through the prism. The reality is known as the white light on the
    one hand, and as the spectrum on the other. It is not unknowable,
    but knowable.

    Suppose that one and the same reality exhibits one aspect when it
    stands in relation to another object; two aspects when it stands in
    relation in two different objects; three aspects when it stands in
    relation to three different objects. The reality of one aspect never
    proves the unreality of another aspect, for all these three aspects
    can be equally real. A tree appears to us as a vegetable; it appears
    to some birds as a shelter; and it appears to some worms as a food.
    The reality of its aspect as a vegetable never proves the unreality
    of its aspect as food, nor the reality of its aspect as food
    disproves the reality of its aspect as shelter. The real tree does
    not exist beyond or behind the vegetable. We can rely upon its
    reality, and make use of it to a fruitful result. At the same time,
    the birds can rely on its reality as a shelter, and build their nests
    in it; the worms, too, can rely on its reality as food, and eat it-to
    their satisfaction. A reality which appears to me as my wife must
    appear to my son as his mother, and never as his wife. But the same
    real woman is in the wife and in the mother; neither is unreal.

    15. Thing-in-Itself means Thing-Knowerless.

    How, then, did philosophers come to consider reality to be unknowable
    and hidden behind or beyond appearances? They investigated all the
    possible presentations in different relationships, and put them all
    aside as appearances, and brooded on the thing-in-itself, shut out
    from all possible relationship, and declared it unknowable.
    Thing-in-itself means thing cut off from all possible relationships.
    To, put it in another way: thing-in-itself means thing deprived of
    its relation to its knower--that is to say, thing-knower-less. So
    that to declare thing-in-itself unknowable is as much as to declare
    thing-unknowable unknowable; there is no doubt about it, but what
    does it prove?

    Deprive yourself of all the possible relationships, and see what you
    are. Suppose you are not a son to your parents, nor the husband to
    your wife, nor the father to your children, nor a relative to your
    kindred, nor a friend to your acquaintances, nor a teacher to your
    students, nor a citizen to your country, nor an individual member to
    your society, nor a creature to your God, then you get
    you-in-yourself. Now ask yourself what is you-in-yourself? You can
    never answer the question. It is unknowable, just because it is cut
    off from all knowable relations. Can you thus prove that
    you-in-yourself exist beyond or behind you?

    In like manner our universe appears to us human beings as the
    phenomenal world or presentation. It might appear to other creatures
    of a different mental constitution as something else. We cannot
    ascertain how it might seem to Devas, to Asuras, to angels, and to
    the Almighty, if there be such beings. However different it might
    seem to these beings, it does not imply that the phenomenal world is
    unreal, nor that the realm of reality is unknowable.

    'Water,' the Indian tradition has it, 'seems to man as a drink, as
    emerald to Devas, as bloody pus to Pretas, as houses to fishes.'
    Water is not a whit less real because of its seeming as houses to
    fishes, and fishes' houses are not less real because of its seeming
    as emerald to Devas. There is nothing that proves the unreality of
    it. It is a gross illusion to conceive reality as transcendental to
    appearances. Reality exists as appearances, and appearances are
    reality known to human beings. You cannot separate appearances from
    reality, and hold out the latter as the object of aspiration at the
    cost of the former. You must acknowledge that the so-called realm of
    reality which you aspire after, and which you seek for outside or
    behind the phenomenal universe, exists here on earth. Let Zen
    teachers tell you that "the world of birth and death is the realm of
    Nirvana"; "the earth is the pure land of Buddha."

    16. The Four Alternatives and the Five Categories.

    There are, according to Zen, the four classes of religious and
    philosophical views, technically called the Four
    Alternatives,[FN#201] of life and of the world. The first is 'the
    deprivation of subject and the non-deprivation of object' that is to
    say, the denial of subject, or mind, or Atman, or soul, and the
    non-denial of object, or matter, or things--a view which denies the
    reality of mind and asserts the existence of things. Such a view was
    held by a certain school of Hinayanism, called Sarvastivada, and
    still is held by some philosophers called materialists or
    naturalists. The second is the 'deprivation of object and the
    non-deprivation of subject'--that is to say, the denial of object, or
    matter, or things, and the non-denial of subject, or mind, or
    spirit-a view which denies the reality of material object, and
    asserts the existence of spirit or ideas. Such a view was held by
    the Dharmalaksana School of Mahayanism, and is still held by some
    philosophers called idealists. The third is 'the deprivation of both
    subject and object'--that is to say, the denial of both subject or
    spirit, and of object or matter-a view which denies the reality of
    both physical and mental phenomena, and asserts the existence of
    reality that transcends the phenomenal universe. Such a view was
    held by the Madhyamika School of Mahayanism, and is still held by
    some religionists and philosophers of the present day. The fourth is
    'the non-deprivation of both subject and object'--that is to say, the
    non-denial of subject and object--a view which holds mind and body as
    one and the same reality. Mind, according to this view, is reality
    experienced inwardly by introspection, and body is the selfsame
    reality observed outwardly by senses. They are one reality and one
    life. There also exist other persons and other beings belonging to
    the same life and reality; consequently all things share in one
    reality, and life in common with each other. This reality or life is
    not transcendental to mind and body, or to spirit and matter, but is
    the unity of them. In other words, this phenomenal world of ours is
    the realm of reality. This view was held by the Avatamsaka School of
    Mahayanism, and is still held by Zenists. Thus Zen is not
    materialistic, nor idealistic, nor nihilistic, but realistic and
    monistic in its view of the world.

    [FN#201] Shi-rya-ken in Japanese, the classification mostly made use
    of by masters of the Rin Zai School of Zen. For the details, see
    Ki-gai-kwan, by K. Watanabe.

    There are some scholars that erroneously maintain that Zen is based
    on the doctrine of unreality of all things expounded by Kumarajiva
    and his followers. Ko-ben,[FN#202] known as Myo-ye Sho-nin, said 600
    years ago: "Yang Shan (Kyo-zan) asked Wei Shan (I-san): 'What shall
    we do when hundreds, thousands, and millions of things beset us all
    at once?' 'The blue are not the yellow,' replied Wei Shan, 'the long
    are not the short. Everything is in its own place. It has no
    business with you.' Wei Shan was a great Zen master. He did not
    teach the unreality of all things. Who can say that Zen is

    [FN#202] A well-known scholar (1173-1232) of the Anatamsaka School
    of Mahayanism.

    Besides the Four Alternatives, Zen uses the Five Categories[FN#203]
    in order to explain the relation between reality and phenomena. The
    first is 'Relativity in Absolute,' which means that the universe
    appears to be consisting in relativities, owing to our relative
    knowledge; but these relativities are based on absolute reality. The
    second is 'Absolute in Relativity,' which means Absolute Reality does
    not remain inactive, but manifests itself as relative phenomena. The
    third is 'Relativity out of Absolute,' which means Absolute Reality
    is all in all, and relative phenomena come out of it as its secondary
    and subordinate forms. The fourth is 'Absolute up to Relativity,'
    which means relative phenomena always play an important part on the
    stage of the world; it is through these phenomena that Absolute
    Reality comes to be understood. The fifth is the 'Union of both
    Absolute and Relativity,' which means Absolute Reality is not
    fundamental or essential to relative phenomena, nor relative
    phenomena subordinate or secondary to Absolute Reality--that is to
    say, they are one and the same cosmic life, Absolute Reality being
    that life experienced inwardly by intuition, while relative phenomena
    are the same life outwardly observed by senses. The first four
    Categories are taught to prepare the student's mind for the
    acceptance of the last one, which reveals the most profound truth.

    [FN#203] Go-i in Japanese, mostly used by the So-To School of Zen.
    The detailed explanation is given in Go-i-ken-ketsu.

    17. Personalism of B. P. Bowne.

    B. P. Bowne[FN#204] says: They (phenomena) are not phantoms or
    illusions, nor are they masks of a back-lying reality which is trying
    to peer through them." "The antithesis," he continues,[FN#205] "of
    phenomena and noumena rests on the fancy that there is something that
    rests behind phenomena which we ought to perceive but cannot, because
    the masking phenomena thrusts itself between the reality and us."
    Just so far we agree with Bowne, but we think he is mistaken in
    sharply distinguishing between body and self, saying:[FN#206] "We
    ourselves are invisible. The physical organism is only an instrument
    for expressing and manifesting the inner life, but the living self is
    never seen." "Human form," he argues,[FN#207] "as an object in space
    apart from our experience of it as the instrument and expression of
    personal life, would have little beauty or attraction; and when it is
    described in anatomical terms, there is nothing in it that we should
    desire it. The secret of its beauty and its value lies in the
    invisible realm." "The same is true," he says again, "of literature.
    It does not exist in space, or in time, or in books, or in libraries
    . . . all that could be found there would be black marks on a white
    paper, and collections of these bound together in various forms,
    which would be all the eyes could see. But this would not be
    literature, for literature has its existence only in mind and for
    mind as an expression of mind, and it is simply impossible and
    meaningless in abstraction from mind." "Our human history"--he gives
    another illustration[FN#208]--"never existed in space, and never
    could so exist. If some visitor from Mars should come to the earth
    and look at all that goes on in space in connection with human
    beings, he would never get any hint of its real significance. He
    would be confined to integrations and dissipations of matter and
    motion. He could describe the masses and grouping of material
    things, but in all this be would get no suggestion of the inner life
    which gives significance to it all. As conceivably a bird might sit
    on a telegraph instrument and become fully aware of the clicks of the
    machine without any suspicion of the existence or meaning of the
    message, or a dog could see all that eye can see in a book yet
    without any hint of its meaning, or a savage could gaze at the
    printed score of an opera without ever suspecting its musical import,
    so this supposed visitor would be absolutely cut off by an impassable
    gulf from the real seat and significance of human history. The great
    drama of life, with its likes and dislikes, its loves and hates, its
    ambitions and strivings, and manifold ideas, inspirations,
    aspirations, is absolutely foreign to space, and could never in any
    way be discovered in space. So human history has its seat in the

    [FN#204] 'Personalism,' p. 94.

    [FN#205] Ibid., p. 95.

    [FN#206] Ibid., p. 268.

    [FN#207] Ibid., p. 271.

    [FN#208] 'Personalism,' pp. 272, 273.

    In the first place, Bowne's conception of the physical organism as
    but an instrument for the expression of the inner, personal life,
    just as the telegraphic apparatus is the instrument for the
    expression of messages, is erroneous, because body is not a mere
    instrument of inner personal life, but an essential constituent of
    it. Who can deny that one's physical conditions determine one's
    character or personality? Who can overlook the fact that one's
    bodily conditions positively act upon one's personal life? There is
    no physical organism which remains as a mere passive mechanical
    instrument of inner life within the world of experience. Moreover,
    individuality, or personality, or self, or inner life, whatever you
    may call it, conceived as absolutely independent of physical
    condition, is sheer abstraction. There is no such concrete
    personality or individuality within our experience.

    In the second place, he conceives the physical organism simply as a
    mark or symbol, and inner personal life as the thing marked or
    symbolized; so he compares physical forms with paper, types, books,
    and libraries, and inner life, with literature. In so doing he
    overlooks the essential and inseparable connection between the
    physical organism and inner life, because there is no essential
    inseparable connection between a mark or symbol and the thing marked
    or symbolized. The thing may adopt any other mark or symbol. The
    black marks on the white paper, to use his figure, are not essential
    to literature. Literature may be expressed by singing, or by speech,
    or by a series of pictures. But is there inner life expressed, or
    possible to be expressed, in any other form save physical organism?
    We must therefore acknowledge that inner life is identical with
    physical organism, and that reality is one and the same as appearance.

    18. All the Worlds in Ten Directions are Buddha's Holy Land.

    We are to resume this problem in the following chapter. Suffice it
    to say for the present it is the law of Universal Life that
    manifoldness is in unity, and unity is in manifoldness; difference is
    in agreement, and agreement in difference; confliction is in harmony,
    and harmony in confliction; parts are in the whole, and the whole is
    in parts; constancy is in change, and change in constancy; good is in
    bad, and bad in good; integration is in disintegration, and
    disintegration is in integration; peace is in disturbance, and
    disturbance in peace. We can find something celestial among the
    earthly. We can notice something glorious in the midst of the base
    and degenerated.

    'There are nettles everywhere, but are not smooth, green grasses more
    common still?' Can you recognize something awe-inspiring in the rise
    and fall of nations? Can you not recognize something undisturbed and
    peaceful among disturbance and trouble? Has not even grass some
    meaning? Does not even a stone tell the mystery of Life? Does not
    the immutable law of good sway over human affairs after all, as
    Tennyson says-

    "I can but trust that good shall fall
    At last-far off-at last, to all."

    Has not each of us a light within him, whatever degrees of lustre
    there may be? Was Washington in the wrong when he said: "Labour to
    keep alive in your heart that little spark of celestial fire called

    We are sure that we can realize the celestial bliss in this very
    world, if we keep alive the Enlightened Consciousness, of which
    Bodhidharma and his followers showed the example. 'All the worlds in
    ten directions are Buddha's Holy Lands!' That Land of Bliss and
    Glory exists above us, under us, around us, within us, without us, if
    we open our eyes to see. 'Nirvana is in life itself,' if we enjoy it
    with admiration and love. "Life and death are the life of Buddha,"
    says Do-gen. Everywhere the Elysian gates stand open, if we do not
    shut them up by ourselves. Shall we starve ourselves refusing to
    accept the rich bounty which the Blessed Life offers to us? Shall we
    perish in the darkness of scepticism, shutting our eyes to the light
    of Tathagata? Shall we suffer from innumerable pains in the
    self-created hell where remorse, jealousy, and hatred feed the fire
    of anger? Let us pray to Buddha, not in word only, but in the deed
    of generosity and tolerance, in the character noble and loving, and
    in the personality sublime and good. Let us pray to Buddha to save
    us from the hell of greed and folly, to deliver us from the thraldom
    of temptation. Let us 'enter the Holy of Holies in admiration and



    1. Epicureanism and Life.

    There are a good many people always buoyant in spirit and mirthful in
    appearance as if born optimists. There are also no fewer persons
    constantly crestfallen and gloomy as if born pessimists. The former,
    however, may lose their buoyancy and sink deep in despair if they are
    in adverse circumstances. The latter, too, may regain their
    brightness and grow exultant if they are under prosperous conditions.
    As there is no evil however small but may cause him to groan under
    it, who has his heart undisciplined, so there is no calamity however
    great but may cause him to despair, who has his feelings in control.
    A laughing child would cry, a crying child would laugh, without a
    sufficient cause. 'It can be teased or tickled into anything.' A
    grown-up child is he who cannot hold sway over his passions.

    He should die a slave to his heart, which is wayward and blind, if he
    be indulgent to it. It is of capital importance for us to discipline
    the heart,[FN#209] otherwise it will discipline us. Passions are
    like legs. They should be guided by the eye of reason. No wise
    serpent is led by its tail, so no wise man is led by his passion.
    Passions that come first are often treacherous and lead us astray.
    We must guard ourselves against them. In order to gratify them there
    arise mean desires-the desires to please sight, hearing, smell,
    taste, and touch. These five desires are ever pursuing or, rather,
    driving us. We must not spend our whole lives in pursuit of those
    mirage-like objects which gratify our sensual desires. When we
    gratify one desire, we are silly enough to fancy that we have
    realized true happiness. But one desire gratified begets another
    stronger and more insatiable. Thirst allayed with salt water becomes
    more intense than ever.

    [FN#209] Compare Gaku-do-yo-jin-shu, chap. i., and Zen-kwan-saku

    Shakya Muni compared an Epicurean with a dog chewing a dry bone,
    mistaking the blood out of a wound in his mouth for that of the bone.
    The author of Mahaparinirvana-sutra[FN#210] has a parable to the
    following effect: 'Once upon a time a hunter skilled in catching
    monkeys alive went into the wood. He put something very sticky on
    the ground, and hid himself among the bushes. By-and-by a monkey
    came out to see what it was, and supposing it to be something
    eatable, tried to feed on it. It stuck to the poor creature's snout
    so firmly that he could not shake it off. Then he attempted to tear
    it off with both his paws, which also stuck to it. Thereupon he
    strove to kick it off with both his hind-legs, which were caught too.
    Then the hunter came out, and thrusting his stick through between
    the paws and hind-legs of the victim, and thus carrying it on his
    shoulder, went home.' In like manner an Epicurean (the monkey),
    allured by the objects of sense (something sticky), sticks to the
    five desires (the snout and the four limbs), and being caught by
    Temptation (the hunter), loses his life of Wisdom.

    [FN#210] The sutra translated by Hwui Yen and Hwui Kwan, A.D.

    We are no more than a species of monkeys, as evolutionists hold. Not
    a few testify to this truth by their being caught by means of
    'something eatable.' We abolished slavery and call ourselves
    civilized nations. Have we not, nevertheless, hundreds of life-long
    slaves to cigars among us? Have we not thousands of life-long slaves
    to spirits among us? Have we not hundreds of thousands of life-long
    slaves to gold among us? Have we not myriads of lifelong slaves to
    vanity among us? These slaves are incredibly loyal to, and
    incessantly work for, their masters, who in turn bestow on them
    incurable diseases, poverty, chagrin, and disappointment.

    A poor puppy with an empty can tied to his tail, Thomas Carlyle
    wittily observes, ran and ran on, frightened by the noise of the can.
    The more rapidly he ran, the more loudly it rang, and at last he
    fell exhausted of running. Was it not typical of a so-called great
    man of the world? Vanity tied an empty can of fame to his tail, the
    hollow noise of which drives him through life until he falls to rise
    no more. Miserable!

    Neither these men of the world nor Buddhist ascetics can be
    optimists. The latter rigorously deny themselves sensual
    gratifications, and keep themselves aloof from all objects of
    pleasure. For them to be pleased is equivalent to sin, and to laugh,
    to be cursed. They would rather touch an adder's head than a piece
    of money.[FN#211] They would rather throw themselves into a fiery
    furnace than to come in contact with the other sex. Body for them is
    a bag full of blood and pus;[FN#212] life, an idle, or rather evil,
    dream. Vegetarianism and celibacy are their holy privileges. Life
    is unworthy of having; to put an end to it is their
    deliverance.[FN#213] Such a view of life is hardly worth our

    [FN#211] Such is the precept taught in the Vinaya of Hinayanists.

    [FN#212] See Mahasatiptthana Suttanta, 2-13.

    [FN#213] This is the logical conclusion of Hinayanism.

    2. The Errors of Philosophical Pessimists and Religious Optimists.

    Philosophical pessimists[FN#214] maintain that there are on earth
    many more causes of pain than of pleasure; and that pain exists
    positively, but pleasure is a mere absence of pain because we are
    conscious of sickness but not of health; of loss, but not of
    possession. On the contrary, religious optimists insist that there
    must not be any evil in God's universe, that evil has no independent
    nature, but simply denotes a privation of good--that is, evil is
    null, is nought, is silence implying sound.'

    [FN#214] Schopenhauer, 'The World as Will and Idea' (R. B. Haldane
    and J. Kemp's translation, vol. iii., pp. 384-386); Hartman,
    'Philosophy of the Unconsciousness' (W. C. Coupland's translation,
    vol. iii., pp. 12-119).

    No matter what these one-sided observers' opinion may be, we are
    certain that we experience good as well as evil, and feel pain and
    pleasure as well. Neither can we alleviate the real sufferings of
    the sick by telling them that sickness is no other than the absence
    of health, nor can we make the poor a whit richer by telling them
    that poverty is a mere absence of riches. How could we save the
    dying by persuading them that death is a bare privation of life? Is
    it possible to dispirit the happy by telling them that happiness is
    unreal, or make the fortunate miserable by telling them that fortune
    has no objective reality, or to make one welcome evil by telling one
    that it is only the absence of good?

    You must admit there are no definite external causes of pain nor
    those of pleasure, for one and the same thing causes pain at one time
    and pleasure at another. A cause of delight to one person turns out
    to be that of aversion to another. A dying miser might revive at the
    sight of gold, yet a Diogenes would pass without noticing it. Cigars
    and wine are blessed gifts of heaven to the intemperate,[FN#215] but
    accursed poison to the temperate. Some might enjoy a long life, but
    others would heartily desire to curtail it. Some might groan under a
    slight indisposition, while others would whistle away a life of
    serious disease. An Epicure might be taken prisoner by poverty, yet
    an Epictetus would fearlessly face and vanquish him. How, then, do
    you distinguish the real cause of pain from that of pleasure? How do
    you know the causes of one are more numerous than the causes of the

    [FN#215] The author of Han Shu (Kan Sho) calls spirits the gift of

    Expose thermometers of several kinds to one and the same temperature.
    One will indicate, say, 60°, another as high as 100°, another as low as
    15°. Expose the thermometers of human sensibilities, which are of
    myriads of different kinds, to one and the same temperature of
    environment. None of them will indicate the same degrees. In one
    and the same climate, which we think moderate, the Eskimo would be
    washed with perspiration, while the Hindu would shudder with cold.
    Similarly, under one and the same circumstance some might be
    extremely miserable and think it unbearable, yet others would be
    contented and happy. Therefore we may safely conclude that there are
    no definite external causes of pain and pleasure, and that there must
    be internal causes which modify the external.

    3. The Law of Balance.

    Nature governs the world with her law of balance. She puts things
    ever in pairs,[FN#216] and leaves nothing in isolation. Positives
    stand in opposition to negatives, actives to passives, males to
    females, and so on. Thus we get the ebb in opposition to the flood
    tide; the centrifugal force to the centripetal; attraction to
    repulsion; growth to decay; toxin to antitoxin; light to shade;
    action to reaction; unity to variety; day to night; the animate to
    the inanimate. Look at our own bodies: the right eye is placed side
    by side with the left; the left shoulder with the right; the right
    lung with the left; the left hemisphere of the brain with that of the
    right; and so forth.

    [FN#216] Zenists call them 'pairs of opposites.'

    It holds good also in human affairs: advantage is always accompanied
    by disadvantage; loss by gain; convenience by inconvenience; good by
    evil; rise by fall; prosperity by adversity; virtue by vice; beauty
    by deformity; pain by pleasure; youth by old age; life by death. 'A
    handsome young lady of quality,' a parable in Mahaparinirvana-sutra
    tells us, 'who carries with her an immense treasure is ever
    accompanied by her sister, an ugly woman in rags, who destroys
    everything within her reach. If we win the former, we must also get
    the latter.' As pessimists show intense dislike towards the latter
    and forget the former, so optimists admire the former so much that
    they are indifferent to the latter.

    4. Life Consists in Conflict.

    Life consists in conflict. So long as man remains a social animal he
    cannot live in isolation. All individual hopes and aspirations
    depend on society. Society is reflected in the individual, and the
    individual in society. In spite of this, his inborn free will and
    love of liberty seek to break away from social ties. He is also a
    moral animal, and endowed with love and sympathy. He loves his
    fellow-beings, and would fain promote their welfare; but he must be
    engaged in constant struggle against them for existence. He
    sympathizes even with animals inferior to him, and heartily wishes to
    protect them; yet he is doomed to destroy their lives day and night.
    He has many a noble aspiration, and often soars aloft by the wings of
    imagination into the realm of the ideal; still his material desires
    drag him down to the earth. He lives on day by day to continue his
    life, but he is unfailingly approaching death at every moment.

    The more he secures new pleasure, spiritual or material, the more he
    incurs pain not yet experienced. One evil removed only gives place
    to another; one advantage gained soon proves itself a disadvantage.
    His very reason is the cause of his doubt and suspicion; his
    intellect, with which he wants to know everything, declares itself to
    be incapable of knowing anything in its real state; his finer
    sensibility, which is the sole source of finer pleasure, has to
    experience finer suffering. The more he asserts himself, the more he
    has to sacrifice himself. These conflictions probably led Kant to
    call life "a trial time, wherein most succumb, and in which even the
    best does not rejoice in his life." "Men betake themselves," says
    Fichte, "to the chase after felicity. . . . But as soon as they
    withdraw into themselves and ask themselves, 'Am I now happy?' the
    reply comes distinctly from the depth of their soul, 'Oh no; thou art
    still just as empty and destitute as before!' . . . They will in the
    future life just as vainly seek blessedness as they have sought it in
    the present life."

    It is not without reason that the pessimistic minds came to conclude
    that 'the unrest of unceasing willing and desiring by which every
    creature is goaded is in itself unblessedness,' and that 'each
    creature is in constant danger, constant agitation, and the whole,
    with its restless, meaningless motion, is a tragedy of the most
    piteous kind.' 'A creature like the carnivorous animal, who cannot
    exist at all without continually destroying and tearing others, may
    not feel its brutality, but man, who has to prey on other sentient
    beings like the carnivorous, is intelligent enough, as hard fate
    would have it, to know and feel his own brutal living.' He must be
    the most miserable of all creatures, for he is most conscious of his
    own misery. Furthermore, 'he experiences not only the misfortunes
    which actually befall him, but in imagination he goes through every
    possibility of evil.' Therefore none, from great kings and emperors
    down to nameless beggars, can be free from cares and anxieties, which
    'ever flit around them like ghosts.'

    5. The Mystery of Life.

    Thus far we have pointed out the inevitable conflictions in life in
    order to prepare ourselves for an insight into the depth of life. We
    are far from being pessimistic, for we believe that life consists in
    confliction, but that confliction does not end in confliction, but in
    a new form of harmony. Hope comes to conflict with fear, and is
    often threatened with losing its hold on mind; then it renews its
    life and takes root still deeper than before. Peace is often
    disturbed with wars, but then it gains a still firmer ground than
    ever. Happiness is driven out of mind by melancholy, then it is
    re-enforced by favourable conditions and returns with double
    strength. Spirit is dragged down by matter from its ideal heaven,
    then, incited by shame, it tries a higher flight. Good is opposed by
    evil, then it gathers more strength and vanquishes its foe. Truth is
    clouded by falsehood, then it issues forth with its greater light.
    Liberty is endangered by tyranny, then it overthrows it with a
    splendid success.

    Manifoldness stands out boldly against unity; difference against
    agreement; particularity against generality; individuality against
    society. Manifoldness, nevertheless, instead of annihilating,
    enriches unity; difference, instead of destroying agreement, gives it
    variety; particularities, instead of putting an end to generality,
    increase its content; individuals, instead of breaking the harmony of
    society, strengthen the power of it.

    Thus 'Universal Life does not swallow up manifoldness nor extinguish
    differences, but it is the only means of bringing to its full
    development the detailed content of reality; in particular, it does
    not abolish the great oppositions of life and world, but takes them
    up into itself and brings them into fruitful relations with each
    other.' Therefore 'our life is a mysterious blending of freedom and
    necessity, power and limitation, caprice and law; yet these opposites
    are constantly seeking and finding a mutual adjustment.'

    6. Nature Favours Nothing in Particular.

    There is another point of view of life, which gave the present writer
    no small contentment, and which he believes would cure one of
    pessimistic complaint. Buddha, or Universal Life conceived by Zen,
    is not like a capricious despot, who acts not seldom against his own
    laws. His manifestation as shown in the Enlightened Consciousness is
    lawful, impartial, and rational. Buddhists believe that even Shakya
    Muni himself was not free from the law of retribution, which
    includes, in our opinion, the law of balance and that of causation.

    Now let us briefly examine how the law of balance holds its sway over
    life and the world. When the Cakravartin, according to an Indian
    legend, the universal monarch, would come to govern the earth, a
    wheel would also appear as one of his treasures, and go on rolling
    all over the world, making everything level and smooth. Buddha is
    the spiritual Cakravartin, whose wheel is the wheel of the law of
    balance, with which he governs all things equally and impartially.
    First let us observe the simplest cases where the law of balance
    holds good. Four men can finish in three days the same amount of
    work as is done by three men in four days. The increase in the
    number of men causes the decrease in that of days, the decrease in
    the number of men causes the increase in that of days, the result
    being always the same. Similarly the increase in the sharpness of a
    knife is always accompanied by a decrease in its durability, and the
    increase of durability by a decrease of sharpness. The more
    beautiful flowers grow, the uglier their fruits become; the prettier
    the fruits grow, the simpler become their flowers. 'A strong soldier
    is ready to die; a strong tree is easy to be broken; hard leather is
    easy to be torn. But the soft tongue survives the hard teeth.'
    Horned creatures are destitute of tusks, the sharp-tusked creatures
    lack horns. Winged animals are not endowed with paws, and handed
    animals are provided with no wings. Birds of beautiful plumage have
    no sweet voice, and sweet-voiced songsters no feathers of bright
    colours. The finer in quality, the smaller in quantity, and bulkier
    in size, the coarser in nature.

    Nature favours nothing in particular. So everything has its
    advantage and disadvantage as well. What one gains on the one hand
    one loses on the other. The ox is competent in drawing a heavy cart,
    but he is absolutely incompetent in catching mice. A shovel is fit
    for digging, but not for ear-picking. Aeroplanes are good for
    aviation, but not for navigation. Silkworms feed on mulberry leaves
    and make silk from it, but they can do nothing with other leaves.
    Thus everything has its own use or a mission appointed by Nature; and
    if we take advantage of it, nothing is useless, but if not, all are
    useless. 'The neck of the crane may seem too long to some idle
    on-lookers, but there is no surplus in it. The limbs of the tortoise
    may appear too short, but there is no shortcoming in them.' The
    centipede, having a hundred limbs, can find no useless feet; the
    serpent, having no foot, feels no want.

    7. The Law of Balance in Life.

    It is also the case with human affairs. Social positions high or
    low, occupations spiritual or temporal, work rough or gentle,
    education perfect or imperfect, circumstances needy or opulent, each
    has its own advantage as well as disadvantage. The higher the
    position the graver the responsibilities, the lower the rank the
    lighter the obligation. The director of a large bank can never be so
    careless as his errand-boy who may stop on the street to throw a
    stone at a sparrow; nor can the manager of a large plantation have as
    good a time on a rainy day as his day-labourers who spend it in
    gambling. The accumulation of wealth is always accompanied by its
    evils; no Rothschild nor Rockefeller can be happier than a poor

    A mother of many children may be troubled by her noisy little ones
    and envy her sterile friend, who in turn may complain of her
    loneliness; but if they balance what they gain with what they lose,
    they will find the both sides are equal. The law of balance strictly
    forbids one's monopoly of happiness. It applies its scorpion whip to
    anyone who is given to pleasures. Joy in extremity lives next door
    to exceeding sorrow. "Where there is much light," says Goethe,
    "shadow is deep." Age, withered and disconsolate, lurks under the
    skirts of blooming youth. The celebration of birthday is followed by
    the commemoration of death. Marriage might be supposed to be the
    luckiest event in one's life, but the widow's tears and the orphan's
    sufferings also might be its outcome. But for the former the latter
    can never be. The death of parents is indeed the unluckiest event in
    the son's life, but it may result in the latter's inheritance of an
    estate, which is by no means unlucky. The disease of a child may
    cause its parents grief, but it is a matter of course that it lessens
    the burden of their livelihood. Life has its pleasures, but also its
    pains. Death has no pleasure of life, but also none of its pain. So
    that if we balance their smiles and tears, life and death are equal.
    It is not wise for us, therefore, to commit suicide while the terms
    of our life still remain, nor to fear death when there is no way of
    avoiding it.

    Again, the law of balance does not allow anyone to take the lion's
    share of nature's gifts. Beauty in face is accompanied by deformity
    in character. Intelligence is often uncombined with virtue. "Fair
    girls are destined to be unfortunate," says a Japanese proverb, "and
    men of ability to be sickly." "He makes no friend who never makes a
    foe." "Honesty is next to idiocy." "Men of genius," says
    Longfellow, "are often dull and inert in society; as the blazing
    meteor when it descends to earth is only a stone." Honour and shame
    go hand in hand. Knowledge and virtue live in poverty, while ill
    health and disease are inmates of luxury.

    Every misfortune begets some sort of fortune, while every good luck
    gives birth to some sort of bad luck. Every prosperity never fails
    to sow seeds of adversity, while every fall never fails to bring
    about some kind of rise. We must not, then, despair in days of frost
    and snow, reminding ourselves of sunshine and flowers that follow
    them; nor must we be thoughtless in days of youth and health, keeping
    in mind old age and ill health that are in the rear of them. In
    brief, all, from crowns and coronets down to rags and begging bowls,
    have their own happiness and share heavenly grace alike.

    8. The Application of the Law of Causation to Morals.

    Although it may be needless to state here the law of causation at any
    length, yet it is not equally needless to say a few words about its
    application to morals as the law of retribution, which is a matter of
    dispute even among Buddhist scholars. The kernel of the idea is very
    simple-like seed, like fruit; like cause, like effect; like action,
    like influence--nothing more. As fresh air strengthens and impure
    air chokes us, so good conduct brings about good consequence, and bad
    conduct does otherwise.[FN#217]

    [FN#217] Zen lays much stress on this law. See Shu-sho-gi and
    Ei-hei-ka-kun, by Do-gen.

    Over against these generalizations we raise no objection, but there
    are many cases, in practical life, of doubtful nature. An act of
    charity, for example, might do others some sort of damage, as is
    often the case with the giving of alms to the poor, which may produce
    the undesirable consequence of encouraging beggary. An act of love
    might produce an injurious effect, as the mother's love often spoils
    her children. Some[FN#218] may think these are cases of good cause
    and bad effect. We have, however, to analyze these causes and
    effects in order to find in what relation they stand. In the first
    case the good action of almsgiving produces the good effect of
    lessening the sufferings of the poor, who should be thankful for
    their benefactor. The giver is rewarded in his turn by the peace and
    satisfaction of his conscience. The poor, however, when used to
    being given alms are inclined to grow lazy and live by means of
    begging. Therefore the real cause of the bad effect is the
    thoughtlessness of both the giver and the given, but not charity
    itself. In the second case the mother's love and kindness produce a
    good effect on her and her children, making them all happy, and
    enabling them to enjoy the pleasure of the sweet home; yet
    carelessness and folly on the part of the mother and ingratitude on
    the part of the children may bring about the bad effect.

    [FN#218] Dr. H. Kato seems to have thought that good cause may bring
    out bad effect when he attacked Buddhism on this point.

    History is full of numerous cases in which good persons were so
    unfortunate as to die a miserable death or to live in extreme
    poverty, side by side with those cases in which bad people lived in
    health and prosperity, enjoying a long life. Having these cases in
    view, some are of the opinion that there is no law of retribution as
    believed by the Buddhists. And even among the Buddhist scholars
    themselves there are some who think of the law of retribution as an
    ideal, and not as a law governing life. This is probably due to
    their misunderstanding of the historical facts. There is no reason
    because he is good and honourable that he should be wealthy or
    healthy; nor is there any reason because he is bad that he should be
    poor or sickly. To be good is one thing, and to be healthy or rich
    is another. So also to be bad is one thing, And to be poor and sick
    is another. The good are not necessarily the rich or the healthy,
    nor are the bad necessarily the sick or the poor. Health must be
    secured by the strict observance of hygienic rules, and not by the
    keeping of ethical precepts; nor can wealth ever be accumulated by
    bare morality, but by economical and industrial activity. The moral
    conduct of a good person has no responsibility for his ill health or
    poverty; so also the immoral action of a bad person has no concern
    with his wealth or health. You should not confuse the moral with the
    physical law, since the former belongs only to human life, while the
    latter to the physical world.

    The good are rewarded morally, not physically; their own virtues,
    honours, mental peace, and satisfaction are ample compensation for
    their goodness. Confucius, for example, was never rich nor high in
    rank; he was, nevertheless, morally rewarded with his virtues,
    honours, and the peace of mind. The following account of
    him,[FN#219] though not strictly historical, well explains his state
    of mind in the days of misfortune:

    "When Confucius was reduced to extreme distress between Khan and
    Zhai, for seven days he had no cooked meat to eat, but only some soup
    of coarse vegetables without any rice in it. His countenance wore
    the appearance of great exhaustion, and yet be kept playing on his
    lute and singing inside the house. Yen Hui (was outside) selecting
    the vegetables, while Zze Lu and Zze Kung were talking together, and
    said to him: 'The master has twice been driven from Lu; he had to
    flee from Wei; the tree beneath which he rested was cut down in Sung;
    he was reduced to extreme distress in Shang and Kau; he is held in a
    state of siege here between Khan and Zhai; anyone who kills him will
    be held guiltless; there is no prohibition against making him a
    prisoner. And yet he keeps playing and singing, thrumming his lute
    without ceasing. Can a superior man be without the feeling of shame
    to such an extent as this?' Yen Hui gave them no reply, but went in
    and told (their words) to Confucius, who pushed aside his lute and
    said: 'Yu and Zhze are small men. Call them here, and I will explain
    the thing to them.'

    [FN#219] The account is given by Chwang Tsz in his book, vol.
    xviii., p. 17.

    "When they came in, Zze Lu said: 'Your present condition may be
    called one of extreme distress!' Confucius replied: 'What words are
    these? When the superior man has free course with his principles,
    that is what we call his success; when such course is denied, that is
    what we call his failure. Now I hold in my embrace the principles of
    righteousness and benevolence, and with them meet the evils of a
    disordered age; where is the proof of my being in extreme distress?
    Therefore, looking inwards and examining myself, I have no
    difficulties about my principles; though I encounter such
    difficulties (as the present), I do not lose my virtue. It is when
    winter's cold is come, and the hoar-frost and snow are falling, that
    we know the vegetative power of the pine and cypress. This distress
    between Khan and Zhai is fortunate for me.' He then took back his
    lute so that it emitted a twanging sound, and began to play and sing.
    (At the same time) Zze Lu hurriedly seized a shield and began to
    dance, while Zze Kung said: 'I did not know (before) the height of
    heaven nor the depth of earth!'"

    Thus the good are unfailingly rewarded with their own virtue, and the
    wholesome consequences of their actions on society at large. And the
    bad are inevitably recompensed with their own vices, and the
    injurious effects of their actions on their fellow-beings. This is
    the unshaken conviction of humanity, past, present, and future. It
    is the pith and marrow of our moral ideal. It is the crystallization
    of ethical truths, distilled through long experiences from time
    immemorial to this day. We can safely approve Edwin Arnold, as he

    "Lo I as hid seed shoots after rainless years,
    So good and evil, pains and pleasures, hates
    And loves, and all dead deeds come forth again,
    Bearing bright leaves, or dark, sweet fruit or sour."

    Longfellow also says:

    "No action, whether foul or fair,
    Is ever done, but it leaves somewhere
    A record-as a blessing or a curse."

    9. Retribution[FN#220] in the Past, the Present, and the Future Life.

    Then a question suggests itself: If there be no soul that survives
    body (as shown in the preceding chapter), who will receive the
    retributions of our actions in the present life? To answer this
    question, we have to restate our conviction that life is one and the
    same; in other words, the human beings form one life or one
    self--that is to say, our ancestors in the past formed man's past
    life. We ourselves now form man's present life, and our posterity
    will form the future life. Beyond all doubt, all actions of man in
    the past have brought their fruits on the present conditions of man,
    and all actions of the present man are sure to influence the
    conditions of the future man. To put it in another way, we now reap
    the fruits of what we sowed in our past life (or when we lived as our
    fathers), and again shall reap the fruits of what we now sow in our
    future life (or when we shall live as our posterity).

    There is no exception to this rigorous law of retribution, and we
    take it as the will of Buddha to leave no action without being
    retributed. Thus it is Buddha himself who kindles our inward fire to
    save ourselves from sin and crimes. We must purge out all the stains
    in our hearts, obeying Buddha's command audible in the innermost self
    of ours. It is the great mercy of His that, however sinful,
    superstitious, wayward, and thoughtless, we have still a light within
    us which is divine in its nature. When that light shines forth, all
    sorts of sin are destroyed at once. What is our sin, after all? It
    is nothing but illusion or error originating in ignorance and folly.
    How true it is, as an Indian Mahayanist declares, that 'all frost and
    the dewdrops of sin disappear in the sunshine of wisdom!'[FN#221]
    Even if we might be imprisoned in the bottomless bell, yet let once
    the Light of Buddha shine upon us, it would be changed into heaven.
    Therefore the author of Mahakarunika-sutra[FN#222] says: "When I
    climb the mountain planted with swords, they would break under my
    tread. When I sail on the sea of blood, it will be dried up. When I
    arrive at Hades, they will be ruined at once."

    [FN#220] The retribution cannot be explained by the doctrine of the
    transmigration of the soul, for it is incompatible with the
    fundamental doctrine of non-soul. See Abhidharmamahavibhasa-castra,
    vol. cxiv.

    [FN#221] Samantabhadra-dhyana-sutra.

    [FN#222] Nanjo's Catalogue, No. 117.

    10. The Eternal Life as taught by Professor Munsterberg.

    Some philosophical pessimists undervalue life simply because it is
    subject to limitation. They ascribe all evils to that condition,
    forgetting that without limitation life is a mere blank. Suppose our
    sight could see all things at once, then sight has no value nor use
    for us, because it is life's purpose to choose to see one thing or
    another out of many; and if all things be present at once before us
    through sight, it is of no purpose. The same is true of intellect,
    bearing, smell, touch, feeling, and will. If they be limitless, they
    cease to be useful for us. Individuality necessarily implies
    limitation, hence if there be no limitation in the world, then there
    is no room for individuality. Life without death is no life at all.

    Professor Hugo Munsterberg finds no value, so it seems to me, in
    'such life as beginning with birth and ending with death.' He
    says:[FN#223] "My life as a causal system of physical and
    psychological processes, which lies spread out in time between the
    dates of my birth and of my death, will come to an end with my last
    breath; to continue it, to make it go on till the earth falls into
    the sun, or a billion times longer, would be without any value, as
    that kind of life which is nothing but the mechanical occurrence of
    physiological and psychological phenomena had as such no ultimate
    value for me or for you, or for anyone, at any time. But my real
    life, as a system of interrelated-will-attitudes, has nothing before
    or after because it is beyond time. It is independent of birth and
    death because it cannot be related to biological events; it is not
    born, and will not die; it is immortal; all possible thinkable time
    is enclosed in it; it is eternal."

    [FN#223] 'The Eternal Life,' p. 26.

    Professor Munsterberg tries to distinguish sharply life as the causal
    system of physiological and psychological processes, and life as a
    system of interrelated-will-attitudes, and denounces the former as
    fleeting and valueless, in order to prize the latter as eternal and
    of absolute value. How could he, however, succeed in his task unless
    he has two or three lives, as some animals are believed to have? Is
    it not one and the same life that is treated on the one hand by
    science as a system of physiological and psychological processes, and
    is conceived on the other by the Professor himself as a system of
    interrelated-will-attitudes? It is true that science treats of life
    as it is observed in time, space, and causality, and it estimates it
    of no value, since to estimate the value of things is no business of
    science. The same life observed as a system of
    interrelated-will-attitudes is independent of time, space, and
    causality as he affirms. One and the same life includes both phases,
    the difference being in the points of view of the observers.

    Life as observed only from the scientific point of view is bare
    abstraction; it is not concrete life; nor is life as observed only in
    the interrelated-will-attitude point of view the whole of life. Both
    are abstractions. Concrete life includes both phases. Moreover,
    Professor Munsterberg sees life in the relationship entirely
    independent-of time, space, and causality, saying: "If you agree or
    disagree with the latest act of the Russian Czar, the only
    significant relation which exists between him and you has nothing to
    do with the naturalistic fact that geographically 'an ocean lies
    between you; and if you are really a student of Plato, your only
    important relation to the Greek philosopher has nothing to do with
    the other naturalistic fact that biologically two thousand years lie
    between you"; and declares life (seen from that point of view) to be
    immortal and eternal. This is as much as to say that life, when seen
    in the relationship independent of time and space, is independent of
    time and space-that is, immortal and eternal. Is it not mere
    tautology? He is in the right in insisting that life can be seen
    from the scientific point of view as a system of physiological and
    psychological processes, and at the same time as a system of
    interrelated-will-attitudes independent of time and space. But he
    cannot by that means prove the existence of concrete individual life
    which is eternal and immortal, because that which is independent of
    time and space is the relationship in which he observes life, but not
    life itself. Therefore we have to notice that life held by Professor
    Munsterberg to be eternal and immortal is quite a different thing
    from the eternal life or immortality of soul believed by common sense.

    11. Life in the Concrete.

    Life in the concrete, which we are living, greatly differs from life
    in the abstract, which exists only in the class-room. It is not
    eternal; it is fleeting; it is full of anxieties, pains, struggles,
    brutalities, disappointments, and calamities. We love life, however,
    -not only for its smoothness, but for its roughness; not only for its
    pleasure, but for its pain; not only for its hope, but for its fear;
    not only for its flowers, but for its frost and snow. As
    Issai[FN#224] (Sato) has aptly put it: "Prosperity is like spring, in
    which we have green leaves and flowers wherever we go; while
    adversity is like winter, in which we have snow and ice. Spring, of
    course, pleases us; winter, too, displeases us not." Adversity is
    salt to our lives, as it keeps them from corruption, no matter how
    bitter to taste it way be. It is the best stimulus to body and mind,
    since it brings forth latent energy that may remain dormant but for
    it. Most people hunt after pleasure, look for good luck, hunger
    after success, and complain of pain, ill-luck, and failure. It does
    not occur to them that 'they who make good luck a god are all unlucky
    men,' as George Eliot has wisely observed. Pleasure ceases to be
    pleasure when we attain to it; another sort of pleasure displays
    itself to tempt us. It is a mirage, it beckons to us to lead us
    astray. When an overwhelming misfortune looks us in the face, our
    latent power is sure to be aroused to grapple with it. Even delicate
    girls exert the power of giants at the time of emergency; even
    robbers or murderers are found to be kind and generous when we are
    thrown into a common disaster. Troubles and difficulties call forth
    our divine force, which lies deeper than the ordinary faculties, and
    which we never before dreamed we possessed.

    [FN#224] A noted scholar (1772-1859) and author, who belonged to the
    Wang School of Confucianism. See Gen-shi-roku.

    12. Difficulties are no Match for the Optimist.

    How can we suppose that we, the children of Buddha, are put at the
    mercy of petty troubles, or intended to be crushed by obstacles? Are
    we not endowed with inner force to fight successfully against
    obstacles and difficulties, and to wrest trophies of glory from
    hardships? Are we to be slaves to the vicissitudes of fortune? Are
    we doomed to be victims for the jaws of the environment? It is not
    external obstacles themselves, but our inner fear and doubt that
    prove to be the stumbling-blocks in the path to success; not material
    loss, but timidity and hesitation that ruin us for ever.

    Difficulties are no match for the optimist, who does not fly from
    them, but welcomes them. He has a mental prism which can separate
    the insipid white light of existence into bright hues. He has a
    mental alchemy by which he can produce golden instruction out of the
    dross of failure. He has a spiritual magic which makes the nectar of
    joy out of the tears of sorrow. He has a clairvoyant eye that can
    perceive the existence of hope through the iron walls of despair.
    Prosperity tends to make one forget the grace of Buddha, but
    adversity brings forth one's religious conviction. Christ on the
    cross was more Christ than Jesus at the table. Luther at war with
    the Pope was more Luther than he at peace. Nichi-ren[FN#225] laid
    the foundation of his church when sword and sceptre threatened him
    with death. Shin-ran[FN#226] and Hen-en[FN#227] established their
    respective faiths when they were exiled. When they were exiled, they
    complained not, resented not, regretted not, repented not, lamented
    not, but contentedly and joyously they met with their inevitable
    calamity and conquered it. Ho-nen is said to have been still more
    joyous and contented when be bad suffered from a serious disease,
    because he had the conviction that his desired end was at hand.

    [FN#225] The founder (1222-1282) of the Nichi Ren Sect, who was
    exiled in 1271 to the Island of Sado. For the history and doctrine
    of the Sect, see I A Short History of the Twelve Japanese Buddhist
    Sects,' by B. Nanjo, pp. 132-147.

    [FN#226] The founder (1173-1262) of the Shin Sect, who was banished
    to the province of Eechigo in 1207. See Nanjo's 'History,' pp.

    [FN#227] The founder (1131 1212) of the Jo Do Sect, who was exiled
    to the Island of Tosa in 1207. See Nanjo's 'History,' pp. 104-113.

    A Chinese monk, E Kwai by name, one day seated himself in a quiet
    place among hills and practised Dhyana. None was there to disturb
    the calm enjoyment of his meditation. The genius of the hill was so
    much stung by his envy that he made up his mind to break by surprise
    the mental serenity of the monk. Having supposed nothing ordinary
    would be effective, he appeared all on a sudden before the man,
    assuming the frightful form of a headless monster. E Kwai being
    disturbed not a whit, calmly eyed the monster, and observed with a
    smile: "Thou hast no head, monster! How happy thou shouldst be, for
    thou art in no danger of losing thy head, nor of suffering from

    Were we born headless, should we not be happy, as we have to suffer
    from no headache? Were we born eyeless, should we not be happy, as
    we are in no danger of suffering from eye disease? Ho Ki
    Ichi,[FN#228] a great blind scholar, was one evening giving a
    lecture, without knowing that the light had been put out by the wind.
    When his pupils requested him to stop for a moment, he remarked with
    a smile: "Why, how inconvenient are your eyes!" Where there is
    contentment, there is Paradise.

    [FN#228] Hanawa (1746-1821), who published Gun-sho-rui-zu in 1782.

    13. Do Thy Best and Leave the Rest to Providence.

    There is another point of view which enables us to enjoy life. It is
    simply this, that everything is placed in the condition best for
    itself, as it is the sum total of the consequences of its actions and
    reactions since the dawn of time. Take, for instance, the minutest
    grains of dirt that are regarded by us the worst, lifeless,
    valueless, mindless, inert matter. They are placed in their best
    condition, no matter how poor and worthless they may seem. They can
    never become a thing higher nor lower than they. To be the grains of
    dirt is best for them. But for these minute microcosms, which,
    flying in the air, reflect the sunbeams, we could have no azure sky.
    It is they that scatter the sun's rays in mid-air and send them into
    our rooms. It is also these grains of dirt that form the nuclei of
    raindrops and bring seasonable rain. Thus they are not things
    worthless and good for nothing, but have a hidden import and purpose
    in their existence. Had they mind to think, heart to feel, they
    should be contented and happy with their present condition.

    Take, for another example, the flowers of the morning glory. They
    bloom and smile every morning, fade and die in a few hours. How
    fleeting and ephemeral their lives are! But it is that short life
    itself that makes them frail, delicate, and lovely. They come forth
    all at once as bright and beautiful as a rainbow or as the Northern
    light, and disappear like dreams. This is the best condition for
    them, because, if they last for days together, the morning glory
    shall no longer be the morning glory. It is so with the cherry-tree
    that puts forth the loveliest flowers and bears bitter fruits. It is
    so with the apple-tree, which bears the sweetest of fruits and has
    ugly blossoms. It is so with animals and men. Each of them is
    placed in the condition best for his appointed mission.

    The newly-born baby sucks, sleeps, and cries. It can do no more nor
    less. Is it not best for it to do so? When it attained to its
    boyhood, he goes to school and is admitted to the first-year class.
    He cannot be put in a higher nor lower class. It is best for him to
    be the first-year class student. When his school education is over,
    he may get a position in society according to his abilities, or may
    lead a miserable life owing to his failure of some sort or other. In
    any case he is in a position best for his special mission ordained by
    Providence or the Hum-total of the fruits of his actions and
    reactions since all eternity. He should be contented and happy, and
    do what is right with might and main. Discontent and vexation only
    make him more worthy of his ruin Therefore our positions, no matter,
    how high or low, no matter how favourable or unfavourable our
    environment, we are to be cheerful. "Do thy best and leave the rest
    to Providence," says a Chinese adage. Longfellow also says:

    "Do thy best; that is best.
    Leave unto thy Lord the rest."



    1. The Method of Instruction Adopted by Zen Masters.

    Thus far we have described the doctrine of Zen inculcated by both
    Chinese and Japanese masters, and in this chapter we propose to
    sketch the practice of mental training and the method of practising
    Dhyana or Meditation. Zen teachers never instruct their pupils by
    means of explanation or argument, but urge them to solve by
    themselves through the practice of Meditation such problems as--'What
    is Buddha?' What is self?' 'What is the spirit of Bodhidharma?'
    'What is life and death?' 'What is the real nature of mind?' and so
    on. Ten Shwai (To-sotsu), for instance, was wont to put three
    questions[FN#229] to the following effect: (1) Your study and
    discipline aim at the understanding of the real nature of mind.
    Where does the real nature of mind exist? (2) When you understand
    the real nature of mind, you are free from birth and death. How can
    you be saved when you are at the verge of death? (3) When you are
    free from birth and death, you know where you go after death. Where
    do you go when your body is reduced to elements? The pupils are not
    requested to express their solution of these problems in the form of
    a theory or an argument, but to show how they have grasped the
    profound meaning implied in these problems, how they have established
    their conviction, and how they can carry out what they grasped in
    their daily life.

    [FN#229] The famous three difficult questions, known as the Three
    Gates of Teu Shwai (To Sotsu San Kwan), who died in 1091. See Mu Mon
    Kwan, xlvii.

    A Chinese Zen master[FN#230] tells us that the method of instruction
    adopted by Zen may aptly be compared with that of an old burglar who
    taught his son the art of burglary. The burglar one evening said to
    his little son, whom he desired to instruct in the secret of his
    trade: "Would you not, my dear boy, be a great burglar like myself?"
    "Yes, father," replied the promising young man." "Come with me,
    then. I will teach you the art." So saying, the man went out,
    followed by his son. Finding a rich mansion in a certain village,
    the veteran burglar made a hole in the wall that surrounded it.
    Through that hole they crept into the yard, and opening a window with
    complete ease broke into the house, where they found a huge box
    firmly locked up as if its contents were very valuable articles. The
    old man clapped his hands at the lock, which, strange to tell,
    unfastened itself. Then he removed the cover and told his son to get
    into it and pick up treasures as fast as he could. No sooner had the
    boy entered the box than the father replaced the cover and locked it
    up. He then exclaimed at the top of his voice: "Thief! thief! thief!
    thief!" Thus, having aroused the inmates, he went out without taking
    anything. All the house was in utter confusion for a while; but
    finding nothing stolen, they went to bed again. The boy sat holding
    his breath a short while; but making up his mind to get out of his
    narrow prison, began to scratch the bottom of the box with his
    finger-nails. The servant of the house, listening to the noise,
    supposed it to be a mouse gnawing at the inside of the box; so she
    came out, lamp in hand, and unlocked it. On removing the cover, she
    was greatly surprised to find the boy instead of a little mouse, and
    gave alarm. In the meantime the boy got out of the box and went down
    into the yard, hotly pursued by the people. He ran as fast as
    possible toward the well, picked up a large stone, threw it down into
    it, and hid himself among the bushes. The pursuers, thinking the
    thief fell into the well, assembled around it, and were looking into
    it, while the boy crept out unnoticed through the hole and went home
    in safety. Thus the burglar taught his son how to rid himself of
    overwhelming difficulties by his own efforts; so also Zen teachers
    teach their pupils how to overcome difficulties that beset them on
    all sides and work out salvation by themselves.

    [FN#230] Wu Tsu (Go So), the teacher of Yuen Wu (En Go).

    2. The First Step in the Mental Training.

    Some of the old Zen masters are said to have attained to supreme
    Enlightenment after the practice of Meditation for one week, some for
    one day, some for a score of years, and some for a few months. The
    practice of Meditation, however, is not simply a means for
    Enlightenment, as is usually supposed, but also it is the enjoyment
    of Nirvana, or the beatitude of Zen. It is a matter, of course, that
    we have fully to understand the doctrine of Zen, and that we have to
    go through the mental training peculiar to Zen in order to be

    The first step in the mental training is to become the master of
    external things. He who is addicted to worldly pleasures, however
    learned or ignorant he may be, however high or low his social
    position may be, is a servant to mere things. He cannot adapt the
    external world to his own end, but he adapts himself to it. He is
    constantly employed, ordered, driven by sensual objects. Instead of
    taking possession of wealth, he is possessed by wealth. Instead of
    drinking liquors, he is swallowed up by his liquors. Balls and music
    bid him to run mad. Games and shows order him not to stay at home.
    Houses, furniture, pictures, watches, chains, hats, bonnets, rings,
    bracelets, shoes--in short, everything has a word to command him.
    How can such a person be the master of things? To Ju (Na-kae) says:
    "There is a great jail, not a jail for criminals, that contains the
    world in it. Fame, gain, pride, and bigotry form its four walls.
    Those who are confined in it fall a prey to sorrow and sigh for ever."

    To be the ruler of things we have first to shut up all our senses,
    and turn the currents of thoughts inward, and see ourselves as the
    centre of the world, and meditate that we are the beings of highest
    intelligence; that Buddha never puts us at the mercy of natural
    forces; that the earth is in our possession; that everything on earth
    is to be made use of for our noble ends; that fire, water, air,
    grass, trees, rivers, hills, thunder, cloud, stars, the moon, the
    sun, are at our command; that we are the law-givers of the natural
    phenomena; that we are the makers of the phenomenal world; that it is
    we that appoint a mission through life, and determine the fate of man.

    3. The Next Step in the Mental Training.

    In the next place we have to strive to be the master of our bodies.
    With most of the unenlightened, body holds absolute control over
    Self. Every order of the former has to be faithfully obeyed by the
    latter. Even if Self revolts against the tyranny of body, it is
    easily trampled down under the brutal hoofs of bodily passion. For
    example, Self wants to be temperate for the sake of health, and would
    fain pass by the resort for drinking, but body would force Self into
    it. Self at times lays down a strict dietetic rule for himself, but
    body would threaten Self to act against both the letter and spirit of
    the rule. Now Self aspires to get on a higher place among sages, but
    body pulls Self down to the pavement of masses. Now Self proposes to
    give some money to the poor, but body closes the purse tightly. Now
    Self admires divine beauty, but body compels him to prefer
    sensuality. Again, Self likes spiritual liberty, but body confines
    him in its dungeons.

    Therefore, to got Enlightened, we must establish the authority of
    Self over the whole body. We must use our bodies as we use our
    clothes in order to accomplish our noble purposes. Let us command
    body not to shudder under a cold shower-bath in inclement weather,
    not to be nervous from sleepless nights, not to be sick with any sort
    of food, not to groan under a surgeon's knife, not to succumb even if
    we stand a whole day in the midsummer sun, not to break down under
    any form of disease, not to be excited in the thick of
    battlefield--in brief, we have to control our body as we will.

    Sit in a quiet place and meditate in imagination that body is no more
    bondage to you, that it is your machine for your work of life, that
    you are not flesh, that you are the governor of it, that you can use
    it at pleasure, and that it always obeys your order faithfully.
    Imagine body as separated from you. When it cries out, stop it
    instantly, as a mother does her baby. When it disobeys you, correct
    it by discipline, as a master does his pupil. When it is wanton,
    tame it down, as a horse-breaker does his wild horse. When it is
    sick, prescribe to it, as a doctor does to his patient. Imagine that
    you are not a bit injured, even if it streams blood; that you are
    entirely safe, even if it is drowned in water or burned by fire.

    E-Shun, a pupil and sister of Ryo-an,[FN#231] a famous Japanese
    master, burned herself calmly sitting cross-legged on a pile of
    firewood which consumed her. She attained to the complete mastery of
    her body. Socrates' self was never poisoned, even if his person was
    destroyed by the venom he took. Abraham Lincoln himself stood
    unharmed, even if his body was laid low by the assassin. Masa-shige
    was quite safe, even if his body was hewed by the traitors' swords.
    Those martyrs that sang at the stake to the praise of God could never
    be burned, even if their bodies were reduced to ashes, nor those
    seekers after truth who were killed by ignorance and superstition.
    Is it not a great pity to see a man endowed with divine spirit and
    power easily upset by a bit of headache, or crying as a child under a
    surgeon's knife, or apt to give up the ghost at the coming of little
    danger, or trembling through a little cold, or easily laid low by a
    bit of indisposition, or yielding to trivial temptation?

    [FN#231] Ryo an (E-myo, died 1411), the founder of the monastery of
    Sai-jo-ji, near the city of Odawara. See To-jo-ren-to-roku.

    It is no easy matter to be the dictator of body. It is not a matter
    of theory, but of practice. You must train your body that you may
    enable it to bear any sort of suffering, and to stand unflinched in
    the face of hardship. It is for this that So-rai[FN#232] (Ogiu) laid
    himself on a sheet of straw-mat spread on the ground in the coldest
    nights of winter, or was used to go up and down the roof of his
    house, having himself clad in heavy armour. It is for this that
    ancient Japanese soldiers led extremely simple lives, and that they
    often held the meeting-of-perseverance,[FN#233] in which they exposed
    themselves to the coldest weather in winter or to the hottest weather
    in summer. It is for this that Katsu Awa practised fencing in the
    middle of night in a deep forest.[FN#234]

    [FN#232] One of the greatest scholars of the Tokugawa period, who
    died in 1728. See Etsu-wa-bun-ko.

    [FN#233] The soldiers of the Tokugawa period were used to hold such
    a meeting.

    [FN#234] Kai-shu-gen-ko-roku.

    Ki-saburo, although he was a mere outlaw, having his left arm half
    cut at the elbow in a quarrel, ordered his servant to cut it off with
    a saw, and during the operation he could calmly sit talking and
    laughing with his friends. Hiko-kuro (Takayama),[FN#235] a Japanese
    loyalist of note, one evening happened to come to a bridge where two
    robbers were lying in wait for him. They lay fully stretching
    themselves, each with his head in the middle of the bridge, that he
    might not pass across it without touching them. Hiko-kuro was not
    excited nor disheartened, but calmly approached the vagabonds and
    passed the bridge, treading upon their heads, which act so frightened
    them that they took to their heels without doing any harm to

    [FN#235] A well-known loyalist in the Tokugawa period, who died in

    [FN#236] Etsu-wa-bun-ko.

    The history of Zen is full of the anecdotes that show Zen priests
    were the lords of their bodies. Here we quote a single example by
    way of illustration: Ta Hwui (Dai-ye), once having had a boil on his
    hip, sent for a doctor, who told him that it was fatal, that he must
    not sit in Meditation as usual. Then Ta Hwui said to the physician:
    "I must sit in Meditation with all my might during my remaining days,
    for if your diagnosis be not mistaken, I shall die before long." He
    sat day and night in constant Meditation, quite forgetful of his
    boil, which was broken and gone by itself.[FN#237]

    [FN#237] Sho-bo-gen-zo-zui-mon-ki, by Do-gen.

    4. The Third Step in the Mental Training.

    To be the lord of mind is more essential to Enlightenment, which, in
    a sense, is the clearing away of illusions, the putting out of mean
    desires and passions, and the awakening of the innermost wisdom. He
    alone can attain to real happiness who has perfect control over his
    passions tending to disturb the equilibrium of his mind. Such
    passions as anger, hatred, jealousy, sorrow, worry, grudge, and fear
    always untune one's mood and break the harmony of one's mind. They
    poison one's body, not in a figurative, but in a literal sense of the
    word. Obnoxious passions once aroused never fail to bring about the
    physiological change in the nerves, in the organs, and eventually in
    the whole constitution, and leave those injurious impressions that
    make one more liable to passions of similar nature.

    We do not mean, however, that we ought to be cold and passionless, as
    the most ancient Hinayanists were used to be. Such an attitude has
    been blamed by Zen masters. "What is the best way of living for us
    monks?" asked a monk to Yun Ku (Un-go), who replied: "You had better
    live among mountains." Then the monk bowed politely to the teacher,
    who questioned: "How did you understand me?" "Monks, as I
    understood," answered the man, "ought to keep their hearts as
    immovable as mountains, not being moved either by good or by evil,
    either by birth or by death, either by prosperity or by adversity."
    Hereupon Yun Ku struck the monk with his stick and said: "You forsake
    the Way of the old sages, and will bring my followers to perdition!"
    Then, turning to another monk, inquired: "How did you understand me?"
    "Monks, as I understand," replied the man, "ought to shut their eyes
    to attractive sights and close their ears to musical notes." "You,
    too," exclaimed Yun Ka, "forsake the Way of the old sages, and will
    bring my followers to perdition!" An old woman, to quote another
    example repeatedly told by Zen masters, used to give food and
    clothing to a monk for a score of years. One day she instructed a
    young girl to embrace and ask him: "How do you feel now?" "A
    lifeless tree," replied the monk coolly, "stands on cold rock. There
    is no warmth, as if in the coldest season of the year." The matron,
    being told of this, observed: "Oh that I have made offerings to such
    a vulgar fellow for twenty years!" She forced the monk to leave the
    temple and reduced it to ashes.[FN#238]

    [FN#238] These instances are quoted from Zen-rin-rui-shu.

    If you want to secure Dhyana, let go of your anxieties and failures
    in the past; let bygones be bygones; cast aside enmity, shame, and
    trouble, never admit them into your brain; let pass the imagination
    and anticipation of future hardships and sufferings; let go of all
    your annoyances, vexations, doubts, melancholies, that impede your
    speed in the race of the struggle for existence. As the miser sets
    his heart on worthless dross and accumulates it, so an unenlightened
    person clings to worthless mental dross and spiritual rubbish, and
    makes his mind a dust-heap. Some people constantly dwell on the
    minute details of their unfortunate circumstances, to make themselves
    more unfortunate than they really are; some go over and over again
    the symptoms of their disease to think themselves into serious
    illness; and some actually bring evils on them by having them
    constantly in view and waiting for them. A man asked Poh Chang
    (Hyaku-jo): "How shall I learn the Law?" "Eat when you are hungry,"
    replied the teacher; " sleep when you are tired. People do not
    simply eat at table, but think of hundreds of things; they do not
    simply sleep in bed, but think of thousands of things."[FN#239]

    [FN#239] E-gen and Den-to-roku.

    A ridiculous thing it is, in fact, that man or woman, endowed with
    the same nature as Buddha's, born the lord of all material objects,
    is ever upset by petty cares, haunted by the fearful phantoms of his
    or her own creation, and burning up his or her energy in a fit of
    passion, wasting his or her vitality for the sake of foolish or
    insignificant things.

    It is a man who can keep the balance of his mind under any
    circumstances, who can be calm and serene in the hottest strife of
    life, that is worthy of success, reward, respect, and reputation, for
    he is the master of men. It was at the age of forty-seven that Wang
    Yang Ming[FN#240] (O-yo-mei) won a splendid victory over the rebel
    army which threatened the throne of the Ming dynasty. During that
    warfare Wang was giving a course of lectures to a number of students
    at the headquarters of the army, of which he was the
    Commander-in-chief. At the very outset of the battle a messenger
    brought him the news of defeat of the foremost ranks. All the
    students were terror-stricken and grew pale at the unfortunate
    tidings, but the teacher was not a whit disturbed by it. Some time
    after another messenger brought in the news of complete rout of the
    enemy. All the students, enraptured, stood up and cheered, but he
    was as cool as before, and did not break off lecturing. Thus the
    practiser of Zen has so perfect control over his heart that he can
    keep presence of mind under an impending danger, even in the presence
    of death itself.

    [FN#240] The founder of the Wang School of Confucianism, a practiser
    of Meditation, who was born in 1472, and died at the age of
    fifty-seven in 1529.

    It was at the age of twenty-three that Haku-in got on board a boat
    bound for the Eastern Provinces, which met with a tempest and was
    almost wrecked. All the passengers were laid low with fear and
    fatigue, but Haku-in enjoyed a quiet sleep during the storm, as if he
    were lying on a comfortable bed. It was in the fifth of Mei-ji era
    that Doku-on[FN#241] lived for some time in the city of Tokyo, whom
    some Christian zealots attempted to murder. One day he met with a
    few young men equipped with swords at the gate of his temple. "We
    want to see Doku-on; go and tell him," said they to the priest. "I
    am Doku-on," replied he calmly, "whom you want to see, gentlemen.
    What can I do for you?" "We have come to ask you a favour; we are
    Christians; we want your hoary head." So saying they were ready to
    attack him, who, smiling, replied: "All right, gentlemen. Behead me
    forthwith, if you please." Surprised by this unexpected boldness on
    the part of the priest, they turned back without harming even a hair
    of the old Buddhist.[FN#242]

    [FN#241] Doku On (Ogino), a distinguished Zen master, an abbot of
    So-koku-ji, who was born in 1818, and died in 1895.

    [FN#242] Kin-sei-zen-rin-gen-ko-roku, by D. Mori.

    These teachers could through long practice constantly keep their
    minds buoyant, casting aside useless encumbrances of idle thoughts;
    bright, driving off the dark cloud of melancholy; tranquil, putting
    down turbulent waves of passion; pure, cleaning away the dust and
    ashes of illusion; and serene, brushing off the cobwebs of doubt and
    fear. The only means of securing all this is to realize the
    conscious union with the Universal Life through the Enlightened
    Consciousness, which can be awakened by dint of Dhyana.

    5. Zazen, or the Sitting in Meditation.

    Habit comes out of practice, and forms character by degrees, and
    eventually works out destiny. Therefore we must practically sow
    optimism, and habitually nourish it in order to reap the blissful
    fruit of Enlightenment. The sole means of securing mental calmness
    is the practice of Zazen, or the sitting in Meditation. This method
    was known in India as Yoga as early as the Upanisad period, and
    developed by the followers of the Yoga system.[FN#243] But Buddhists
    sharply distinguished Zazen from Yoga, and have the method peculiar
    to themselves. Kei-zan[FN#244] describes the method to the following
    effect: 'Secure a quiet room neither extremely light nor extremely
    dark, neither very warm nor very cold, a room, if you can, in the
    Buddhist temple located in a beautiful mountainous district. You
    should not practise Zazen in a place where a conflagration or a flood
    or robbers may be likely to disturb you, nor should you sit in a
    place close by the sea or drinking-shops or brothel-houses, or the
    houses of widows and of maidens or buildings for music, nor should
    you live in close proximity to the place frequented by kings,
    ministers, powerful statesmen, ambitious or insincere persons. You
    must not sit in Meditation in a windy or very high place lest you
    should get ill. Be sure not to let the wind or smoke get into your
    room, not to expose it to rain and storm. Keep your room clean.
    Keep it not too light by day nor too dark by night. Keep it warm in
    winter and cool in summer. Do not sit leaning against a wall, or a
    chair, or a screen. You must not wear soiled clothes or beautiful
    clothes, for the former are the cause of illness, while the latter
    the cause of attachment. Avoid the Three Insufficiencies-that is to
    say, insufficient clothes, insufficient food, and insufficient sleep.
    Abstain from all sorts of uncooked or hard or spoiled or unclean
    food, and also from very delicious dishes, because the former cause
    troubles in your alimentary canal, while the latter cause you to
    covet after diet. Eat and drink just too appease your hunger and
    thirst, never mind whether the food be tasty or not. Take your meals
    regularly and punctually, and never sit in Meditation immediately
    after any meal. Do not practise Dhyana soon after you have taken a
    heavy dinner, lest you should get sick thereby. Sesame, barley,
    corn, potatoes, milk, and the like are the best material for your
    food. Frequently wash your eyes, face, hands, and feet, and keep
    them cool and clean.

    [FN#243] See Yoga Sutra with the Commentary of Bhoja Raja
    (translated by Rajendralala Mitra), pp. 102-104.

    [FN#244] Kei-zan (Jo-kin), the founder of So-ji-ji, the head temple
    of the So To Sect of Zen, who died at the age of fifty-eight in 1325.
    He sets forth the doctrine of Zen and the method of practising Zazen
    in his famous work, entitled Za-zen-yo-jin-ki.

    'There are two postures in Zazen--that is to say, the crossed-leg
    sitting, and the half crossed-leg sitting. Seat yourself on a thick
    cushion, putting it right under your haunch. Keep your body so erect
    that the tip of the nose and the navel are in one perpendicular line,
    and both ears and shoulders are in the same plane. Then place the
    right foot upon the left thigh, the left foot on the right thigh, so
    as the legs come across each other. Next put your right hand with
    the palm upward on the left foot, and your left hand on the right
    palm with the tops of both the thumbs touching each other. This is
    the posture called the crossed-leg sitting. You may simply place the
    left foot upon the right thigh, the position of the hands being the
    same as in the cross-legged sitting. This posture is named the half
    crossed-leg sitting.'

    'Do not shut your eyes, keep them always open during whole
    Meditation. Do not breathe through the mouth; press your tongue
    against the roof of the mouth, putting the upper lips and teeth
    together with the lower. Swell your abdomen so as to hold the breath
    in the belly; breathe rhythmically through the nose, keeping a
    measured time for inspiration and expiration. Count for some time
    either the inspiring or the expiring breaths from one to ten, then
    beginning with one again. Concentrate your attention on your breaths
    going in and out as if you are the sentinel standing at the gate of
    the nostrils. If you do some mistake in counting, or be forgetful of
    the breath, it is evident that your mind is distracted.'

    Chwang Tsz seems to have noticed that the harmony of breathing is
    typical of the harmony of mind, since he says: "The true men of old
    did not dream when they slept. Their breathing came deep and
    silently. The breathing of true men comes (even) from his heels,
    while men generally breathe (only) from their throats."[FN#245] At
    any rate, the counting of breaths is an expedient for calming down of
    mind, and elaborate rules are given in the Zen Sutra,[FN#246] but
    Chinese and Japanese Zen masters do not lay so much stress on this
    point as Indian teachers.

    [FN#245] Chwang Tsz, vol. iii., p. 2.

    [FN#246] Dharmatara-dhyana-sutra.

    6. The Breathing Exercise of the Yogi.

    Breathing exercise is one of the practices of Yoga, and somewhat
    similar in its method and end to those of Zen. We quote here[FN#247]
    Yogi Ramacharaka to show how modern Yogis practise it: "(1) Stand or
    sit erect. Breathing through the nostrils, inhale steadily, first
    filling the lower part of the lungs, which is accomplished by
    bringing into play the diaphragm, which, descending, exerts a gentle
    pressure on the abdominal organs, pushing forward the front walls of
    the abdomen. Then fill the middle part of the lungs, pushing out the
    lower ribs, breastbone, and chest. Then fill the higher portion of
    the lungs, protruding the upper chest, thus lifting the chest,
    including the upper six or seven pairs of ribs. In the final
    movement the lower part of the abdomen will be slightly drawn in,
    which movement gives the lungs a support, and also helps to fill the
    highest part of the lungs. At the first reading it may appear that
    this breath consists of three distinct movements. This, however, is
    not the correct idea. The inhalation is continuous, the entire chest
    cavity from the lower diaphragm to the highest point of the chest in
    the region of the collar-bone being expanded with a uniform movement.
    Avoid a jerking series of inhalations, and strive to attain a
    steady, continuous action. Practice will soon overcome the tendency
    to divide the inhalation into three movements, and will result in a
    uniform continuous breath. You will be able to complete the
    inhalation in a couple of seconds after a little practice. (2)
    Retain the breath a few seconds. (3) Exhale quite slowly, holding
    the chest in a firm position, and drawing the abdomen in a little and
    lifting it upward slowly as the air leaves the lungs. When the air
    is entirely exhaled, relax the chest and abdomen. A little practice
    will render this part of exercise easy, and the movement once
    acquired will be afterwards performed almost automatically."

    [FN#247] Hatha Yoga, pp. 112, 113.

    7. Calmness of Mind.

    The Yogi breathing above mentioned is fit rather for physical
    exercise than for mental balance, and it will be beneficial if you
    take that exercise before or after Meditation. Japanese masters
    mostly bold it very important to push forward. The lowest part of
    the abdomen during Zazen, and they are right so far as the present
    writer's personal experiences go.

    'If you feel your mind distracted, look at the tip of the nose; never
    lose sight of it for some time, or look at your own palm, and let not
    your mind go out of it, or gaze at one spot before you.' This will
    greatly help you in restoring the equilibrium of your mind. Chwang
    Tsz[FN#248] thought that calmness of mind is essential to sages, and
    said: "The stillness of the sages does not belong to them as a
    consequence of their skilful ability; all things are not able to
    disturb their minds; it is on this account that they are still. When
    water is still, its clearness shows the beard and eyebrows (of him
    who looks into it). It is a perfect level, and the greatest
    artificer takes his rule from it. Such is the clearness of still
    water, and how much greater is that of the human spirit? The still
    mind of the sage is the mirror of heaven and earth, the glass of all

    Forget all worldly concerns, expel all cares and anxieties, let go of
    passions and desires, give up ideas and thoughts, set your mind at
    liberty absolutely, and make it as clear as a burnished mirror. Thus
    let flow your inexhaustible fountain of purity, let open your
    inestimable treasure of virtue, bring forth your inner hidden nature
    of goodness, disclose your innermost divine wisdom, and waken your
    Enlightened Consciousness to see Universal Life within you. "Zazen
    enables the practiser," says Kei-zan,[FN#249] "to open up his mind,
    to see his own nature, to become conscious of mysteriously pure and
    bright spirit, or eternal light within him."

    [FN#248] Chwang Tsz, vol. v., p. 5.

    [FN#249] Za-zen-yo-jin-ki.

    Once become conscious of Divine Life within you, yon can see it in
    your brethren, no matter how different they may be in circumstances,
    in abilities, in characters, in nationalities, in language, in
    religion, and in race. You can see it in animals, vegetables, and
    minerals, no matter how diverse they may be in form, no matter how
    wild and ferocious some may seem in nature, no matter how unfeeling
    in heart some may seem, no matter how devoid of intelligence some may
    appear, no matter how insignificant some may be, no matter how simple
    in construction some may be, no matter how lifeless some may seem.
    You can see that the whole universe is Enlightened and penetrated by
    Divine Life.

    8. Zazen and the Forgetting of Self.

    Zazen is a most effectual means of destroying selfishness, the root
    of all Sin, folly, vice, and evil, since it enables us to see that
    every being is endowed with divine spirituality in common with men.
    It is selfishness that throws dark shadows on life, just as it is not
    the sun but the body that throws shadow before it. It is the
    self-same selfishness that gave rise to the belief in the immortality
    of soul, in spite of its irrationality, foolishness, and
    superstition. Individual self should be a poor miserable thing if it
    were not essentially connected with the Universal Life. We can
    always enjoy pure happiness when we are united with nature, quite
    forgetful of our poor self. When you look, for example, into the
    smiling face of a pretty baby, and smile with it, or listen to the
    sweet melody of a songster and sing with it, you completely forget
    your poor self at that enraptured moment. But your feelings of
    beauty and happiness are for ever gone when you resume your self, and
    begin to consider them after your own selfish ideas. To forget self
    and identify it with nature is to break down its limitation and to
    set it at liberty. To break down petty selfishness and extend it
    into Universal Self is to unfetter and deliver it from bondage. It
    therefore follows that salvation can be secured not by the
    continuation of individuality in another life, but by the realization
    of one's union with Universal Life, which is immortal, free,
    limitless, eternal, and bliss itself. This is easily effected by

    9. Zen and Supernatural Power.

    Yoga[FN#250] claims that various supernatural powers can be acquired
    by Meditation, but Zen does not make any such absurd claims. It
    rather disdains those who are believed to have acquired supernatural
    powers by the practice of austerities. The following traditions
    clearly show this spirit: "When Fah Yung (Ho-yu) lived in Mount Niu
    Teu[FN#251] (Go-zu-san) he used to receive every morning the
    offerings of flowers from hundreds of birds, and was believed to have
    supernatural powers. But after his Enlightenment by the instruction
    of the Fourth Patriarch, the birds ceased to make offering, because
    be became a being too divine to be seen by inferior animals." "Hwang
    Pah (O-baku), one day going up Mount Tien Tai (Ten-dai-san), which
    was believed to have been inhabited by Arhats with supernatural
    powers, met with a monk whose eyes emitted strange light. They went
    along the pass talking with each other for a short while until they
    came to a river roaring with torrent. There being no bridge, the
    master bad to stop at the shore; but his companion crossed the river
    walking on the water and beckoned to Hwang Pah to follow him.
    Thereupon Hwang Pah said: 'If I knew thou art an Arhat, I would have
    doubled you up before thou got over there!' The monk then understood
    the spiritual attainment of Hwang Pah, and praised him as a true
    Mahayanist." "On one occasion Yang Shan (Kyo-zan) saw a stranger
    monk flying through the air. When that monk came down and approached
    him with a respectful salutation, he asked: 'Where art thou from?
    'Early this morning,' replied the other, 'I set out from India.'
    'Why,' said the teacher, 'art thou so late?' 'I stopped,' responded
    the man, 'several times to look at beautiful sceneries.' Thou mayst
    have supernatural powers,' exclaimed Yang Shan, 'yet thou must give
    back the Spirit of Buddha to me.' Then the monk praised Yang Shan
    saying: 'I have come over to China in order to worship
    Manyjucri,[FN#252] and met unexpectedly with Minor Shakya,' and,
    after giving the master some palm leaves he brought from India, went
    back through the air.'"[FN#253]

    [FN#250] 'Yoga Aphorisms of Patanyjali,' chap. iii.

    [FN#251] A prominent disciple of the Fourth Patriarch, the founder
    of the Niu Teu School (Go-zu-zen) of Zen, who died in A.D. 675.

    [FN#252] Manyjucri is a legendary Bodhisattva, who became an object
    of worship of some Mahayanists. He is treated as a personification
    of transcendental wisdom.

    [FN#253] Hwui Yuen (E-gen) and Sho-bo-gen-zo.

    It is quite reasonable that Zenists distinguish supernatural powers
    from spiritual uplifting, the former an acquirement of Devas, or of
    Asuras, or of Arhats, or of even animals, and the latter as a nobler
    accomplishment attained only by the practisers of Mahayanism.
    Moreover, they use the term supernatural power in a meaning entirely
    different from the original one. Lin Tsi (Rin-zai) says, for
    instance: "There are six supernatural powers of Buddha: He is free
    from the temptation of form, living in the world of form; He is free
    from the temptation of sound, living in the world of sound; He is
    free from the temptation of smell, living in the world of smell; He
    is free from the temptation of taste, living in the world of taste;
    He is free from the temptation of Dharma,[FN#254] living in the world
    of Dharma. These are six supernatural powers."[FN#255]

    [FN#254] The things or objects, not of sense, but of mind.

    [FN#255] Lin Tsi Luh (Rin-zai-roku).

    Sometimes Zenists use the term as if it meant what we call Zen
    Activity, or the free display of Zen in action, as you see in the
    following examples. Tung Shan (To-Zan) was on one occasion attending
    on his teacher Yun Yen (Un-gan), who asked: "What are your
    supernatural powers?" Tung Shan, saying nothing, clasped his hands
    on his breast, and stood up before Yun Yen. "How do you display your
    supernatural powers?" questioned the teacher again. Then Tung Shan
    said farewell and went out. Wei Shan (E-san) one day was taking a
    nap, and seeing his disciple Yang Shan (Kyo-zan) coming into the
    room, turned his face towards the wall. "You need not, Sir," said
    Yang Shan, "stand on ceremony, as I am your disciple." Wei Shan
    seemed to try to get up, so Yang Shan went out; but Wei Shan called
    him back and said: "I shall tell you of a dream I dreamed." The
    other inclined his head as if to listen. "Now," said Wei Shan,
    "divine my fortune by the dream." Thereupon Yang Shan fetched a
    basin of water and a towel and gave them to the master, who washed
    his face thereby. By-and-by Hiang Yen (Kyo-gen) came in, to whom Wei
    Shan said: "We displayed supernatural powers a moment ago. It was
    not such supernatural powers as are shown by Hinayanists." "I know
    it, Sir," replied the other, "though I was down below." "Say, then,
    what it was," demanded the master. Then Hiang Yen made tea and gave
    a cup to Wei Shan, who praised the two disciples, saying: "You
    surpass Çariputra[FN#256] and Maudgalyayana[FN#257] in your wisdom and
    supernatural powers."[FN#258]

    [FN#256] One of the prominent disciples of Shakya Muni, who became
    famous for his wisdom.

    [FN#257] One of the eminent disciples of Shakya Muni, noted for his
    supernatural powers.

    [FN#258] Zen-rin-rui-sku.

    Again, ancient Zenists did not claim that there was any mysterious
    element in their spiritual attainment, as Do-gen says[FN#259]
    unequivocally respecting his Enlightenment: "I recognized only that
    my eyes are placed crosswise above the nose that stands lengthwise,
    and that I was not deceived by others. I came home from China with
    nothing in my hand. There is nothing mysterious in Buddhism. Time
    passes as it is natural, the sun rising in the east, and the moon
    setting into the west."

    [FN#259] Ei-hei-ko-roku.

    10. True Dhyana.

    To sit in Meditation is not the only method of practising Zazen. "We
    practise Dhyana in sitting, in standing, and in walking," says one of
    the Japanese Zenists. Lin Tsi (Rin-Zai) also says: "To concentrate
    one's mind, or to dislike noisy places, and seek only for stillness,
    is the characteristic of heterodox Dhyana." It is easy to keep
    self-possession in a place of tranquillity, yet it is by no means
    easy to keep mind undisturbed amid the bivouac of actual life. It is
    true Dhyana that makes our mind sunny while the storms of strife rage
    around us. It is true Dhyana that secures the harmony of heart,
    while the surges of struggle toss us violently. It is true Dhyana
    that makes us bloom and smile, while the winter of life covets us
    with frost and snow.

    "Idle thoughts come and go over unenlightened minds six hundred and
    fifty times in a snap of one's fingers," writes an Indian
    teacher,[FN#260] "and thirteen hundred million times every
    twenty-four hours." This might be an exaggeration, yet we cannot but
    acknowledge that one idle thought after another ceaselessly bubbles
    up in the stream of consciousness. "Dhyana is the letting go,"
    continues the writer--"that is to say, the letting go of the thirteen
    hundred million of idle thoughts." The very root of these thirteen
    hundred million idle thoughts is an illusion about one's self. He is
    indeed the poorest creature, even if he be in heaven, who thinks
    himself poor. On the contrary, he is an angel who thinks himself
    hopeful and happy, even though he be in hell. "Pray deliver me,"
    said a sinner to Sang Tsung (So-san).[FN#261] "Who ties you up?" was
    the reply. You tie yourself up day and night with the fine thread of
    idle thoughts, and build a cocoon of environment from which you have
    no way of escape. 'There is no rope, yet you imagine yourself
    bound.' Who could put fetters on your mind but your mind itself?
    Who could chain your will but your own will? Who could blind your
    spiritual eyes, unless you yourself shut them up? Who could prevent
    you from enjoying moral food, unless you yourself refuse to eat?
    "There are many," said Sueh Fung (Sep-po) on one occasion, "who
    starve in spite of their sitting in a large basket full of victuals.
    There are many who thirst in spite of seating themselves on the shore
    of a sea." "Yes, Sir," replied Huen Sha (Gen-sha), "there are many
    who starve in spite of putting their heads into the basket full of
    victuals. There are many who thirst in spite of putting their heads
    into the waters of the sea."[FN#262] Who could cheer him up who
    abandons himself to self-created misery? Who could save him who
    denies his own salvation?

    [FN#260] The introduction to Anapana-sutra by Khin San Hwui, who
    came to China A.D. 241.

    [FN#261] The Third Patriarch.

    [FN#262] Hwui Yuen (E-gen).

    11. Let Go of your Idle Thoughts.[FN#263]

    [FN#263] A famous Zenist, Mu-go-koku-shi, is said to have replied to
    every questioner, saying: "Let go of your idle thoughts."

    A Brahmin, having troubled himself a long while with reference to the
    problem of life and of the world, went out to call on Shakya Muni
    that he might be instructed by the Master. He got some beautiful
    flowers to offer them as a present to the Muni, and proceeded to the
    place where He was addressing his disciples and believers. No sooner
    had he come in sight of the Master than he read in his mien the
    struggles going on within him. "Let go of that," said the Muni to
    the Brahmin, who was going to offer the flowers in both his hands.
    He dropped on the ground the flowers in his right hand, but still
    holding those in his left. "Let go of that," demanded the Master,
    and the Brahmin dropped the flowers in his left hand rather
    reluctantly. "Let go of that, I say," the Muni commanded again; but
    the Brahmin, having nothing to let go of, asked: "What shall I let go
    of, Reverend Sir? I have nothing in my hands, you know." "Let go of
    that, you have neither in your right nor in your left band, but in
    the middle." Upon these words of the Muni a light came into the
    sufferer's mind, and he went home satisfied and in joy.[FN#264] "Not
    to attach to all things is Dhyana," writes an ancient Zenist, "and if
    you understand this, going out, staying in, sitting, and lying are in
    Dhyana." Therefore allow not your mind to be a receptacle for the
    dust of society, or the ashes of life, or rags and waste paper of the
    world. You bear too much burden upon your shoulders with which you
    have nothing to do.

    [FN#264] 'Sutra on the Brahmacarin Black-family,' translated into
    Chinese by K' Khien, of the Wu dynasty (A.D. 222-280).

    Learn the lesson of forgetfulness, and forget all that troubles you,
    deprives you of sound sleep, and writes wrinkles on your forehead.
    Wang Yang Ming, at the age of seventeen or so, is said to have
    forgotten the day 'on which he was to be married to a handsome young
    lady, daughter of a man of high position. It was the afternoon of
    the very day on which their nuptials had to be held that he went out
    to take a walk. Without any definite purpose he went into a temple
    in the neighbourhood, and there he found a recluse apparently very
    old with white hair, but young in countenance like a child. The man
    was sitting absorbed in Meditation. There was something extremely
    calm and serene in that old man's look and bearing that attracted the
    young scholar's attention. Questioning him as to his name, age, and
    birthplace, Wang found that the venerable man had enjoyed a life so
    extraordinarily long that he forgot his name and age, but that he had
    youthful energy so abundantly that be could talk with a voice
    sounding as a large bell. Being asked by Wang the secret of
    longevity, the man replied: "There is no secret in it; I merely kept
    my mind calm and peaceful." Further, he explained the method of
    Meditation according to Taoism and Buddhism. Thereupon Wang sat face
    to face with the old man and began to practise Meditation, utterly
    forgetful of his bride and nuptial ceremony. The sun began to cast
    his slanting rays on the wall of the temple, and they sat motionless;
    twilight came over them, and night wrapped them with her sable
    shroud, and they sat as still as two marble statues; midnight, dawn,
    at last the morning sun rose to find them still in their reverie.
    The father of the bride, who had started a search during the night,
    found to his surprise the bridegroom absorbed in Meditation on the
    following day.[FN#265]

    [FN#265] O-yo-mei-shutsu-shin-sei-ran-roku.

    It was at the age of forty-seven that Wang gained a great victory
    over the rebel army, and wrote to a friend saying: "It is so easy to
    gain a victory over the rebels fortifying themselves among the
    mountains, yet it is not so with those rebels living in our
    mind."[FN#266] Tsai Kiun Mu (Sai-kun-bo) is said to have had an
    exceedingly long and beautiful beard, and when asked by the Emperor,
    who received him in audience, whether he should sleep with his beard
    on the comforters or beneath them, be could not answer, since he had
    never known how he did. Being distracted by this question, he went
    home and tried to find out how he had been used to manage his beard
    in bed. First he put his beard on the comforters and vainly tried to
    sleep; then he put it beneath the comforters and thought it all
    right. Nevertheless, he was all the more disturbed by it. So then,
    putting on the comforters, now putting it beneath them, he tried to
    sleep all night long, but in vain. You must therefore forget your
    mental beard that annoys you all the time.

    [FN#266] Ibid.

    Men of longevity never carried troubles to their beds. It is a
    well-known fact that Zui-o (Shi-ga)[FN#267] enjoyed robust health at
    the age of over one hundred years. One day, being asked whether
    there is any secret of longevity, he replied affirmatively, and said
    to the questioner: "Keep your mind and body pure for two weeks,
    abstaining from any sort of impurity, then I shall tell you of the
    secret." The man did as was prescribed, and came again to be
    instructed in the secret. Zui-o said: "Now I might tell you, but be
    cautious to keep yourself pure another week so as to qualify yourself
    to learn the secret." When that week was over the old man said: "Now
    I might tell you, but will you be so careful as to keep yourself pure
    three days more in order to qualify yourself to receive the secret?"
    The man did as he was ordered, and requested the instruction.
    Thereupon Zui-o took the man to his private room and softly
    whispered, with his mouth close to the ear of the man: "Keep the
    secret I tell you now, even at the cost of your life. It is
    this-don't be passionate. That is all."[FN#268]

    [FN#267] This famous old man died in A.D. 1730.

    [FN#268] Se-ji-hyaku-dan.

    12. 'The Five Ranks of Merit.'

    Thus far we have stated how to train our body and mind according to
    the general rules and customs established by Zenists. And here we
    shall describe the different stages of mental uplifting through which
    the student of Zen has to go. They are technically called 'The Five
    Ranks of Merit.'[FN#269] The first stage is called the Rank of
    Turning,[FN#270] in which the student 'turns' his mind from the
    external objects of sense towards the inner Enlightened
    Consciousness. He gives up all mean desires and aspires to spiritual
    elevation. He becomes aware that he is not doomed to be the slave of
    material things, and strives to conquer over them. Enlightened
    Consciousness is likened to the King, and it is called the Mind-King,
    while the student who now turns towards the King is likened to common
    people. Therefore in this first stage the student is in the rank of
    common people.

    [FN#269] Ko-kun-go-i. For further details, see So-to-ni-shi-roku.

    [FN#268] Ko in Japanese.

    The second stage is called the Rank of Service,[FN#271] in which the
    student distinguishes himself by his loyalty to the Mind-King, and
    becomes a courtier to 'serve' him. He is in constant 'service' to
    the King, attending him with obedience and love, and always fearing
    to offend him. Thus the student in this stage is ever careful not to
    neglect rules and precepts laid down by the sages, and endeavours to
    uplift himself in spirituality by his fidelity.
    The third stage is called the Rank of Merit,[FN#272] in which the
    student distinguishes himself by his 'meritorious' acts of conquering
    over the rebel army of passion which rises against the Mind-King.
    Now, his rank is not the rank of a courtier, but the rank of a
    general. In other words, his duty is not only to keep rules and
    instructions of the sages, but to subjugate his own passion and
    establish moral order in the mental kingdom.

    [FN#271] Bu in Japanese.

    [FN#272] Ko in Japanese.

    The fourth stage is called the Rank of Co-operative Merit,[FN#273] in
    which the student 'co-operates' with other persons in order to
    complete his merit. Now, he is not compared with a general who
    conquers his foe, but with the prime-minister who co-operates with
    other officials to the benefit of the people. Thus the student in
    this stage is not satisfied with his own conquest of passion, but
    seeks after spiritual uplifting by means of extending his kindness
    and sympathy to his fellow-men.

    [FN#273] Gu-ko in Japanese.

    The fifth stage is called the Rank of Merit-over-Merit,[FN#274] which
    means the rank of meritless-merit. This is the rank of the King
    himself. The King does nothing meritorious, because all the
    governmental works are done by his ministers and subjects. All that
    he has to do is to keep his inborn dignity and sit high on his
    throne. Therefore his conduct is meritless, but all the meritorious
    acts of his subjects are done through his authority. Doing nothing,
    he does everything. Without any merit, he gets all merits. Thus the
    student in this stage no more strives to keep precepts, but his
    doings are naturally in accord with them. No more he aspires for
    spiritual elevation, but his, heart is naturally pure from material
    desires. No more he makes an effort to vanquish his passion, but no
    passion disturbs him. No more he feels it his duty to do good to
    others, but he is naturally good and merciful. No more he sits in
    Dhyana, but he naturally lives in Dhyana at all times. It is in this
    fifth stage that the student is enabled to identify his Self with the
    Mind-King or Enlightened Consciousness, and to abide in perfect bliss.

    [FN#274] Ko-ko in Japanese.

    13. 'The Ten Pictures of the Cowherd.'[FN#275]

    [FN#275] The pictures were drawn by Kwoh Ngan (Kaku-an), a Chinese
    Zenist. For the details, see Zen-gaku-ho-ten.

    Besides these Five Ranks of Merit, Zenists make use of the Ten
    Pictures of the Cowherd, in order to show the different stages of
    mental training through which the student of Zen has to go. Some
    poems were written by Chinese and Japanese teachers on each of these
    pictures by way of explanation, but they are too ambiguous to be
    translated into English, and we rest content with the translation of
    a single Japanese poem on each of the ten pictures, which are as

    The first picture, called 'the Searching of the Cow,' represents the
    cowherd wandering in the wilderness with a vague hope of finding his
    lost cow that is running wild out of his sight. The reader will
    notice that the cow is likened to the mind of the student and the
    cowherd to the student himself.

    "I do not see my cow,
    But trees and grass,
    And hear the empty cries
    Of cicadas."

    The second picture, called 'the Finding of the Cow's Tracks,'
    represents the cowherd tracing the cow with the sure hope of
    restoring her, having found her tracks on the ground.

    "The grove is deep, and so
    Is my desire.
    How glad I am, O lo!
    I see her tracks."

    The third picture, called 'the Finding out of the Cow,' represents
    the cowherd slowly approaching the cow from a distance.

    "Her loud and wild mooing
    Has led me here;
    I see her form afar,
    Like a dark shadow."

    The fourth 'picture, called 'the Catching of the Cow,' represents the
    cowherd catching hold of the cow, who struggles to break loose from

    "Alas! it's hard to keep
    The cow I caught.
    She tries to run and leap
    And snap the cord."

    The fifth picture, called 'the Taming of the Cow,' represents the
    cowherd pacifying the cow, giving her grass and water.

    "I'm glad the cow so wild
    Is tamed and mild.
    She follows me, as if
    She were my shadow."

    The sixth picture, called 'the Going Home Riding on the Cow,'
    represents the cowherd playing on a flute, riding on the cow.

    "Slowly the clouds return
    To their own hill,
    Floating along the skies
    So calm and still.

    The seventh picture, called 'the Forgetting of the Cow and the
    Remembering of the Man,' represents the cowherd looking at the
    beautiful scenery surrounding his cottage.

    "The cow goes out by day
    And comes by night.
    I care for her in no way,
    But all is right."

    The eighth picture, called 'the Forgetting of the Cow and of the
    Man,' represents a large empty circle.

    "There's no cowherd nor cow
    Within the pen;
    No moon of truth nor clouds
    Of doubt in men."

    The ninth picture, called 'the Returning to the Root and Source,'
    represents a beautiful landscape full of lovely trees in full blossom.

    "There is no dyer of hills,
    Yet they are green;
    So flowers smile, and titter rills
    At their own wills."

    The tenth picture, called 'the Going into the City with Open Hands,'
    represents a smiling monk, gourd in hand, talking with a man who
    looks like a pedlar.

    "The cares for body make
    That body pine;
    Let go of cares and thoughts,
    O child of mine!"

    These Ten Pictures of the Cowherd correspond in meaning to the Five
    Ranks of Merit above stated, even if there is a slight difference, as
    is shown in the following table:


    1. The Rank of Turning---1. The Searching of the Cow.
    2. The Finding of the Cow's Tracks.

    2. The Rank of Service---3. The Finding of the Cow.
    4. The Catching of the Cow.

    3. The Rank of Merit---5. The Taming of the Cow.
    6. The Going Home, Riding on the Cow.

    4. The Rank of Co-operative Merit---9. The Returning to the Root and
    10. The Going into the City with
    Open Hands.

    5. The Rank of Merit-over-Merit---7. The Forgetting of the Cow and
    the Remembering of the Man.
    8. The Forgetting of the Cow and of
    the Man.

    14. Zen and Nirvana.

    The beatitude of Zen is Nirvana, not in the Hinayanistic sense of the
    term, but in the sense peculiar to the faith. Nirvana literally
    means extinction or annihilation; hence the extinction of life or the
    annihilation of individuality. To Zen, however, it means the state
    of extinction of pain and the annihilation of sin. Zen never looks
    for the realization of its beatitude in a place like heaven, nor
    believes in the realm of Reality transcendental of the phenomenal
    universe, nor gives countenance to the superstition of Immortality,
    nor does it hold the world is the best of all possible worlds, nor
    conceives life simply as blessing. It is in this life, full of
    shortcomings, misery, and sufferings, that Zen hopes to realize its
    beatitude. It is in this world, imperfect, changing, and moving,
    that Zen finds the Divine Light it worships. It is in this
    phenomenal universe of limitation and relativity that Zen aims to
    attain to highest Nirvana. "We speak," says the author of
    Vimalakirtti-nirdeca-sutra, "of the transitoriness of body, but not
    of the desire of the Nirvana or destruction of it." "Paranirvana,"
    according to the author of Lankavatarasutra, "is neither death nor
    destruction, but bliss, freedom, and purity." "Nirvana," says Kiai
    Hwan,[FN#276] "means the extinction of pain or the crossing over of
    the sea of life and death. It denotes the real permanent state of
    spiritual attainment. It does not signify destruction or
    annihilation. It denotes the belief in the great root of life and
    spirit." It is Nirvana of Zen to enjoy bliss for all sufferings of
    life. It is Nirvana of Zen to be serene in mind for all disturbances
    of actual existence. It is Nirvana of Zen to be in the conscious
    union with Universal Life or Buddha through Enlightenment.

    [FN#276] A commentator of Saddharma-pundarika-sutra.

    15. Nature and her Lesson.

    Nature offers us nectar and ambrosia every day, and everywhere we go
    the rose and lily await us. "Spring visits us men," says
    Gu-do,[FN#277] "her mercy is great. Every blossom holds out the
    image of Tathagata." "What is the spiritual body of Buddha who is
    immortal and divine?" asked a man to Ta Lun (Dai-ryu), who instantly
    replied: "The flowers cover the mountain with golden brocade. The
    waters tinge the rivulets with heavenly blue." "Universe is the
    whole body of Tathagata; observed Do-gen. "The worlds in ten
    directions, the earth, grass, trees, walls, fences, tiles, pebbles-in
    a word, all the animated and inanimate objects partake of the
    Buddha-nature. Thereby, those who partake in the benefit of the Wind
    and Water that rise out of them are, all of them, helped by the
    mysterious influence of Buddha, and show forth Enlightenment."[FN#278]

    [FN#277] One of the distinguished Zenists in the Tokugawa period,
    who died in 1661.

    [FN#278] Sho-bo gen-zo.

    Thus you can attain to highest bliss through your conscious union
    with Buddha. Nothing can disturb your peace, when you can enjoy
    peace in the midst of disturbances; nothing can cause you to suffer,
    when you welcome misfortunes and hardships in order to train and
    strengthen your character; nothing can tempt you to commit sin, when
    you are constantly ready to listen to the sermon given by everything
    around you; nothing can distress you, when you make the world the
    holy temple of Buddha. This is the state of Nirvana which everyone
    believing in Buddha may secure.

    16. The Beatitude of Zen.

    We are far from denying, as already shown in the foregoing chapters,
    the existence of troubles, pains, diseases, sorrows, deaths in life.
    Our bliss consists in seeing the fragrant rose of Divine mercy among
    the thorns of worldly trouble, in finding the fair oasis of Buddha's
    wisdom in the desert of misfortunes, in getting the wholesome balm of
    His love in the seeming poison of pain, in gathering the sweet honey
    of His spirit even in the sting of horrible death.

    History testifies to the truth that it is misery that teaches men
    more than happiness, that it is poverty that strengthens them more
    than wealth, that it is adversity that moulds character more than
    prosperity, that it is disease and death that call forth the inner
    life more than health and long life. At least, no one can be blind
    to the fact that good and evil have an equal share in forming the
    character and working out the destiny of man. Even such a great
    pessimist as Schopenhauer says: "As our bodily frame would burst
    asunder if the pressure of atmosphere were removed, so if the lives
    of men were relieved of all need, hardship, and adversity, if
    everything they took in hand were successful, they would be so
    swollen with arrogance . . . that they would present the spectacle of
    unbridled folly. A ship without ballast is unstable, and will not go
    straight." Therefore let us make our ship of life go straight with
    its ballast of miseries and hardships, over which we gain control.

    The believer in Buddha is thankful to him, not only for the sunshine
    of life, but also for its wind, rain, snow, thunder, and lightning,
    because He gives us nothing in vain. Hisa-nobu (Ko-yama) was,
    perhaps, one of the happiest persons that Japan ever produced, simply
    because he was ever thankful to the Merciful One. One day he went
    out without an umbrella and met with a shower. Hurrying up to go
    home, he stumbled and fell, wounding both his legs. As he rose up,
    he was overheard to say: "Thank heaven." And being asked why he was
    so thankful, replied: "I got both my legs hurt, but, thank heaven,
    they were not broken." On another occasion he lost consciousness,
    having been kicked violently by a wild horse. When he came to
    himself, he exclaimed: "Thank heaven," in hearty joy. Being asked
    the reason why he was so joyful, he answered: "I have really given up
    my ghost, but, thank heaven, I have escaped death after all."[FN#279]
    A person in such a state of mind can do anything with heart and
    might. Whatever he does is an act of thanks for the grace of Buddha,
    and he does it, not as his duty, but as the overflowing of his
    gratitude which lie himself cannot check. Here exists the formation
    of character. Here exist real happiness and joy. Here exists the
    realization of Nirvana.

    [FN#279] Ki-jin-den.

    Most people regard death as the greatest of evils, only because they
    fear death. They fear death only because they have the instinct of
    self-preservation. Hereupon pessimistic philosophy and religion
    propose to attain to Nirvana by the extinction of Will-to-live, or by
    the total annihilation of life. But this is as much as to propose
    death as the final cure to a patient. Elie Metchnikoff proposes, in
    his 'Nature of Man,' another cure, saying: 'If man could only
    contrive to live long enough--say, for one hundred and forty years--a
    natural desire for extinction would take the place of the instinct
    for self-preservation, and the call of death would then harmoniously
    satisfy his legitimate craving of a ripe old age.' Why, we must ask,
    do you trouble yourself so much about death? Is there any instance
    of an individual who escaped it in the whole history of mankind? If
    there be no way of escape, why do you trouble yourself about it? Can
    you cause things to fall off the earth against the law of
    gravitation? Is there any example of an individual object that
    escaped the government of that law in the whole history of the world?
    Why, then, do you trouble yourself about it? It is no less silly to
    trouble yourself about death than you do about gravitation. Can you
    realize that death, which you have yet no immediate experience of, is
    the greatest of evil? We dare to declare death to be one of the
    blessings which we have to be thankful for. Death is the scavenger
    of the world; it sweeps away all uselessness, staleness, and
    corruption from the world, and keeps life clean and ever now. When
    you are of no use for the world it comes upon you, removes you to
    oblivion in order to relieve life of useless encumbrance. The stream
    of existence should be kept running, otherwise it would become
    putrid. If old lives were to stop the running stream it would stand
    still, and consequently become filthy, poisoned, and worthless.
    Suppose there were only births and no deaths. The earth has to be
    packed with men and women, who are doomed to live to all eternity,
    jostling, colliding, bumping, trampling each other, and vainly
    struggling to get out of the Black Hole of the earth. Thanks to
    death we are not in the Black Hole!

    Only birth and no death is far worse than only death and no birth.
    "The dead," says Chwang Tsz, "have no tyrannical king about, no
    slavish subject to meet; no change of seasons overtakes them. The
    heaven and the earth take the places of Spring and Autumn. The king
    or emperor of a great nation cannot be happier than they." How would
    you be if death should never overtake you when ugly decrepitude makes
    you blind and deaf, bodily and mentally, and deprives you of all
    possible pleasures? How would you be if you should not die when your
    body is broken to pieces or terribly burned by an accident--say, by a
    violent earthquake followed by a great conflagration? Just imagine
    Satan, immortal Satan, thrown down by the ire of God into Hell's
    fiery gulf, rolling himself in dreadful torture to the end of time.
    You cannot but conclude that it is only death which relieves you of
    extreme sufferings, incurable diseases, and it is one of the
    blessings you ought to be thankful for.

    The believer of Buddha is thankful even for death itself, the which
    is the sole means of conquering death. If he be thankful even for
    death, how much more for the rest of things! He can find a meaning
    in every form of life. He can perceive a blessing in every change of
    fortune. He can acknowledge a mission for every individual. He can
    live in contentment and joy under any conditions. Therefore Lin Tsi
    (Rin-zai) says: "All the Buddhas might appear before me and I would
    not be glad. All the Three Regions[FN#280] and Hells might suddenly
    present themselves before me, and I would not fear. . . . He (an
    Enlightened person) might get into the fire, and it would not burn
    him. He might get into water, and it would not drown him. He might
    be born in Hell, and he would be happy as if he were in a fair
    garden. He might be born among Pretas and beasts, and he would not
    suffer from pain. How can he be so? Because he can enjoy

    [FN#280] (1) Naraka, or Hell; (2) Pretas, or hungry demons; (3)

    [FN#281] Lin Tsi Luk (Rin-zai-roku).










    Tsung Mih (Shu-Mitsu, A.D. 774-841), the author of Yuen Jan Lun
    ('Origin of Man'), one of the greatest scholars that China ever
    produced, was born in a Confucianist family of the State of Kwo Cheu.
    Having been converted by Tao Yuen (Do-yen), a noted priest of the
    Zen Sect, he was known at the age of twenty-nine as a prominent
    member of that sect, and became the Eleventh Patriarch after
    Bodhidharma, the First Patriarch of the sect, who had come over to
    China from India about A.D. 520. Some years after he studied under
    Chino, Kwan (Cho-kwan) the philosophical doctrine of the Avatamsaka
    School, now known in Japan as the Kegon Sect, and distinguished
    himself as the Seventh Patriarch of that school. In A.D. 835 he was
    received in audience by the Emperor Wan Tsung, who questioned him in
    a general way about the Buddhist doctrines, and bestowed upon him the
    honourable title of Great Virtuous Teacher, together with abundant
    gifts. The author produced over ninety volumes of books, which
    include a commentary on Avatamsaka-sutra, one on
    Purnabuddha-sutra-prasannartha-sutra, and many others. Yuen Jan Lun
    is one of the shortest of his essays, but it contains all the
    essential doctrines, respecting the origin of life and of the
    universe, which are found in Taoism, Confucianism, Hinayanism, and
    Mahayanism. How important a position it holds among the Buddhist
    books can be well imagined from the fact that over twenty
    commentaries were written on it both by the Chinese and the Japanese
    Buddhist scholars. It is said that a short essay under the same
    title by a noted contemporary Confucianist scholar, Han Tui Chi
    (Kan-tai-shi, who flourished 803-823), suggested to him to write a
    book in order to make clear to the public the Buddhist view on the
    same subject. Thus be entitled the book 'Origin of Man,' in spite of
    his treating of the origin of life and of the universe. Throughout
    the whole book occur coupled sentences, consisting mostly of the same
    number of Chinese characters, and consequently while one sentence is
    too laconic, the other is overladen with superfluous words, put in to
    make the right number in the balanced group of characters. In
    addition to this, the text is full of too concise phrases, and often
    of ambiguous ones, as it is intended to state as briefly as possible
    all the important doctrines of the Buddhist as well as of the outside
    schools. On this account the author himself wrote a few notes on the
    passages that lie thought it necessary to explain. The reader will
    find these notes beginning with 'A' put by the translator to
    distinguish them from his own.

    K. N.



    All animated beings that live (under the sun) have an origin, while
    each of inanimate things, countless in number, owes its existence to
    some source.[FN#283] There can never be (any being nor) any thing
    that has (no origin, as there can be no) branch which has no root.
    How could man, the most spiritual of the Three Powers[FN#284] exist
    without an origin?

    [FN#282] The author treats the origin of life and of the universe,
    but the book was entitled as we have seen in the preface.

    [FN#283] The same idea and expression are found in Tao Teh King
    (Do-toku-kyo), by Lao Tsz (Ro-shi, 604-522 B.C.).

    [FN#284] The Three Powers are-(1) Heaven, that has the power of
    revolution; (2) Earth, that has the power of production; and (3) Man,
    that has the power of thought.

    (It is said),[FN#285] moreover, that that which knows others is
    intellect, and that that which knows itself is wisdom. Now if I,
    being born among men, know not whence I came (into this life), how
    could I know whither I am going in the after-life? How could I
    understand all human affairs, ancient and modern, in the world? So,
    for some scores of years I learned under many different tutors, and
    read extensively (not only) the Buddhist (but also) outside books.
    By that means I tried to trace my Self, and never stopped my research
    till I attained, as I had expected, to its origin.

    [FN#285] The sentence is a direct quotation of Tao Teh King.

    Confucianists and Taoists of our age, nevertheless, merely know that
    our nearest origin is the father or the grandfather, as we are
    descended from them, and they from their fathers in succession.
    (They say) that the remotest (origin) is the undefinable (primordial)
    Gas[FN#286] in the state of chaos; that it split itself into the two
    (different) principles of the Positive and the Negative; that the two
    brought forth the Three Powers of Heaven, Earth, and Man, which (in
    their turn) produced all other things; that man as well as other
    things originated in the Gas.

    [FN#286] Such a statement concerning the creation of the universe as
    the one here given is found in I King (Eeki-kyo). The primordial
    substance is not exactly 'gas,' but we may conceive it as being
    something like a nebula.

    (Some)[FN#287] Buddhists, (however), maintain simply that the nearest
    (origin) is Karma,[FN#288] as we were born among men as the results
    of the Karma that we had produced in the past existences; and that
    the remotest (origin) is the Alaya-vijnyana,[FN#289] (because) our
    Karma is brought forth by illusion, and (illusion by attachment), and
    so forth, in one word, the Alaya is the origin of life. Although all
    of (these scholars) claim that they have already grasped the ultimate
    truth, yet not in fact.

    [FN#287] Not all Buddhists, but some of them, are meant here-that
    is, Hinayanists and Dharma-laksanists.

    [FN#288] According to Hinayanists, Karma (action) is that moral germ
    which survives death and continues in transmigration. It may be
    conceived as something like an energy, by the influence of which
    beings undergo metempsychosis.

    [FN#289] According to the Dharma-laksana Sect, Alaya-vijnyana
    (receptacle-knowledge) is the spiritual Substance which holds the
    'seeds' or potentialities of all things.

    Confucius, Lao Tsz, and Shakya, however, were all the wisest of
    sages. Each of them gave his teachings in a way different from the
    other two, that they might meet the spiritual needs of his time and
    fit to the capacities of men. (So that) the Buddhist and the outside
    doctrines, each supplementing the other, have done good to the
    multitude. They were all (intended) to encourage thousands of
    virtuous acts by explaining the whole chain of causality. They were
    (also intended) to investigate thousands of things, and throw light
    on the beginning and on the end of their evolution. Although all
    these doctrines (might) answer the purpose of the sages, yet there
    must be some teachings that would be temporary,[FN#290] while others
    would be eternal. The first two faiths are merely temporary, while
    Buddhism includes both the temporary and the eternal. We may act
    according to the precepts of these three faiths, which aim at the
    peace and welfare (of man), in so far as they encourage thousands of
    virtuous acts by giving warning against evil and recommending good.
    (But) Buddhism (alone) is altogether perfect and best of all, in
    investigating thousands of things and in tracing them back to their
    first cause, in order to acquire thorough understanding of the
    natures of things and to attain to the ultimate truth.

    [FN#290] The temporary doctrine means the teaching preached by
    Shakya Muni to meet the temporary needs of the hearers. The term is
    always used in contrast with the real or eternal doctrine.

    Each of our contemporary scholars, nevertheless, adheres to one
    school of the (above mentioned) teachings. And there are some (even)
    among the Buddhists who mistake the temporary for the eternal
    doctrine. In consequence they are never successful in tracing
    Heaven, Earth, Man, and other things back to their First Cause. But
    I am now (going to show how) to infer an Ultimate Cause for thousands
    of things, not only from the Buddhist, but from outsiders' teachings.
    First I shall treat of the superficial doctrines, and then of the
    profound, (in order to) free the followers of the temporary faiths
    from those (prejudices that prove to be) obstructions in their way to
    the truth, and enable them to attain to the Ultimate Reality.
    Afterwards I shall point out, according to the perfect doctrine, how
    things evolved themselves through one stage after another out of the
    First Cause (in order to) make the incomplete doctrines fuse into the
    complete one, and to enable the followers to explain the phenomenal

    [FN#291] A. 'That is, Heaven, Earth, Man, and other things.'

    This essay is entitled 'Origin of Man,' and it consists of the
    (following) four chapters: (1) Refutation of Delusive and Prejudiced
    (Doctrine); (2) Refutation of Incomplete and Superficial (Doctrine);
    (3) Direct Explanation of the Real Origin; (4) Reconciliation of the
    Temporary with the Eternal Doctrine.



    According to Confucianism[FN#293] and Taoism all sorts of beings,
    such as men and beasts, were born out of and brought up by the
    (so-called) Great Path of Emptiness.[FN#294] That is to say, the
    Path by the operation of its own law gave rise naturally to the
    primordial Gas, and that Gas produced Heaven and Earth, which (in
    their turn) brought forth thousands of things. Accordingly the wise
    and the unwise, the high and the low, the rich and the poor, the
    happy and the miserable, are predestined to be so by the heavenly
    flat, and are at the mercy of Time and Providence. Therefore they
    (must) come back after death to Heaven and Earth, from which (in
    turn) they return to the (Path) of Emptiness. The main purpose of
    these[FN#295] (two) outside teachings is simply to establish morals
    with regard to bodily actions, but not to trace life to its First
    Cause. They tell of nothing beyond the phenomenal universe in their
    explanation of thousands of things. Though they point out the Great
    Path as the origin, yet they never explain in detail (what is) the
    direct, and (what) the indirect cause of the phenomenal universe, or
    how it was created, or how it will be destroyed, how life came forth,
    whither it will go, (what is) good, (what) evil. Therefore the
    followers of these doctrines adhere to them as the perfect teachings
    without knowing that they are merely temporary.

    [FN#292] A. 'Those of Confucianists and Taoists.'

    [FN#293] Confucianists are not of exactly the same opinion as
    Taoists respecting the creation. The Great Path here mentioned
    refers exclusively to Taoism.

    [FN#294] The Great Path of Emptiness, Hu Wu Ta Tao, is the technical
    name for the Taoist conception of the Absolute. It is something
    existent in an undeveloped state before the creation of the
    phenomenal universe. According to Tao Teh King, it is
    'self-existent, unchangeable, all-pervading, and the mother of all
    things. It is unnamable, but it is sometimes called the Path or the
    Great.' It is also called the Emptiness, as it is entirely devoid of
    relative activities.

    [FN#295] Confucianism mainly treats of ethical problems, but Taoism
    is noted for its metaphysical speculation.

    Now I (shall) raise, in brief, a few questions to point out their
    weaknesses. If everything in the universe, as they say, came out of
    the Great Path of Emptiness, that Great Path itself should be the
    cause of (not only) of wisdom, (but) of folly, (not only) of life,
    (but) of death. It ought to be the source of prosperity (as well as)
    of adversity, of fortune (as well as) of misfortune. If this origin
    exist (as it is supposed) to all eternity, it must be possible
    neither to remove follies, villainies, calamities, and wars, nor to
    promote wisdom, good, happiness, and welfare. Of what use (then) are
    the teachings of Lao Tsz and Chwang Tsz?[FN#296] The Path, besides,
    should have reared the tiger and the wolf, given birth to
    Kieh[FN#297] and Cheu,[FN#298] caused the premature deaths of
    Yen[FN#299] and Jan,[FN#300] and placed I[FN#301] and Tsi[FN#302] in
    their most lamentable condition. How could it be called a noble

    [FN#296] One of the greatest Taoist philosophers, and the author of
    the book entitled after his name. He flourished 339-327 B.C.

    [FN#297] The last Emperor of the Hia dynasty, notorious for his
    vices. His reign was 1818-1767 B.C.

    [FN#298] The last Emperor of the Yin dynasty, one of the worst
    despots. His reign was 1154-1122 B.C.

    [FN#299] Yen Hwui (Gan-kai, 541-483 B.C.), a most beloved disciple
    of Confucius, known as a wise and virtuous scholar.

    [FN#300] Jan Poh Niu (Zen-pak-giu, 521- . . . B.C.), a prominent
    disciple, of Confucius, distinguished for his virtues.

    [FN#301] Poh I (Haku-i), the elder brother of Tsi, who distinguished
    himself by his faith and wisdom at the downfall of the Yin dynasty.

    [FN#302] Shuh Tsi (Shiku Sei), the brother of I, with whom he shared
    the same fate.

    Again, if, as they say, thousands of things could come naturally into
    existence without direct or indirect causes, they should come forth
    in all places where there are neither direct nor indirect causes.
    For instance, a stone would bring forth grass, while grass would give
    birth to man, and man would beget beasts, etc. In addition to this
    they would come out all at the same time, nothing being produced
    before or after the others. They would come into existence all at
    the same moment, nothing being produced sooner or later than the
    others. Peace and welfare might be secured without the help of the
    wise and the good. Humanity and righteousness might be acquired
    without instruction and study. One might even become an immortal
    genius[FN#303] without taking the miraculous medicine. Why did Lao
    Tsz, Chwang Tsz, Cheu Kung[FN#304] and Confucius do such a useless
    task as to found their doctrines and lay down the precepts for men?

    [FN#303] Degenerated Taoists maintained that they could prepare a
    certain miraculous draught, by the taking of which one could become

    [FN#304] Cheu Kung (Shu-ko), a most noted statesman and scholar, the
    younger brother of the Emperor Wu (1122-1116 B.C.), the founder of
    the Chen dynasty.

    Again, if all things, as they say, were made of the primordial Gas
    (which has no feeling nor will), how could an infant, just born of
    the Gas, who had never learned to think, or love, or hate, or to be
    naughty, or wilful (even begin to think or feel)? If, as they may
    answer, the infant as soon as it was born could quite naturally love
    or hate, etc., as it wished, it could (as well) gain the Five
    Virtues[FN#305] and the Six Acquirements,[FN#306] as it wished. Why
    does it wait for some direct or indirect causes (to gain its
    knowledge), and to acquire them through study and instruction?

    [FN#305] (1) Humanity, (2) Uprightness, (3) Propriety, (4) Wisdom,
    (5) Sincerity.

    [FN#306] (1) Reading, (2) Arithmetic, (3) Etiquette, (4) Archery,
    (5) Horsemanship, (6) Music.

    Again, they might say life suddenly came into existence, it being
    formed of the Gas, and suddenly goes to naught (at death), the Gas
    being dispersed. What, then, are the spirits of the dead (which they
    believe in)? Besides, there are in history some instances of
    persons[FN#307] who could see through previous existences, or of
    persons[FN#308] who recollected the events in their past lives.
    Therefore we know that the present is the continuation of the past
    life, and that it did not come into existence on a sudden by the
    formation of a Gas. Again, there are some historical facts[FN#309]
    proving that the supernatural powers of spirits will not be lost.
    Thus we know that life is not to be suddenly reduced to naught after
    death by the dispersion of the Gas. Therefore (matters concerning)
    sacrifices, services, and supplications (to the spirits) are
    mentioned in the sacred books.[FN#310] Even more than that! Are
    there not some instances, ancient and modern, of persons who revived
    after death to tell the matters concerning the unseen world, or
    who[FN#311] appeared to move the hearts of their wives and children a
    while after death, or who[FN#312] took vengeance (on the enemy), or
    who[FN#313] returned favours (to their friends)?

    [FN#307] According to Tsin Shu, a man, Pao Tsing by name, told his
    parents, when he was five years, that he had been in the previous
    life a son to Li, an inhabitant of Kuh Yang, and that he had fallen
    into the well and died. Thereupon the parents called on Li, and
    found, to their astonishment, that the boy's statement was actually
    coincident with the fact.

    [FN#308] Yan Hu, a native of Tsin Chen, recollected, at the age of
    five, that he had been a son to the next-door neighbour, and that he
    had left his ring under a mulberry-tree close by the fence of the
    house. Thereupon he went with his nurse and successfully restored
    it, to the astonishment of the whole family.

    [FN#309] All the ancient sages of China believed in spirits, and
    propitiated them by sacrifices.

    [FN#310] The sacred books of Confucianism, Shu King and Li Ki.

    [FN#311] Pang Shang, the Prince of Tsi, is said to have appeared
    after his death.

    [FN#312] Poh Yiu, of Ching, is said to have become an epidemic
    spirit to take vengeance on his enemies.

    [FN#313] According to Tso Chwen (Sa-den), when Wei Wu, a General of
    Tsin, fought with Tu Hwui, the dead father of his concubine appeared,
    and prevented the march of the enemy in order to return favours done
    to him.

    The outside scholars might ask, by way of objection, if one live as a
    spirit after death, the spirits of the past would fill up streets and
    roads, and be seen by men; and why are there no eye-witnesses? I say
    in reply that (as) there are the Six Worlds[FN#314] for the dead,
    they do not necessarily live in the world of spirits. (Even as
    spirits) they must die and be born again among men or other beings.
    How can the spirits of the past always live in a crowd? Moreover, if
    (as you say) man was born of (primordial) Gas which gave rise to
    Heaven and Earth, and which was unconscious from the very beginning,
    how could he be conscious all on a sudden after his birth? Why are
    trees and grass which were also formed of the same Gas unconscious?
    Again, if, (as you say), the rich and the poor, the high and the low,
    the wise and the unwise, the good and the bad, the happy and the
    unhappy, the lucky and the unlucky, are predestinated alike by
    heavenly decree, why are so many destined by heaven to be poor and so
    few to be rich? Why so many to be low and so few to be high? In
    short, why are so many destined to be unlucky and so few to be lucky?

    [FN#314] (1) The heaven, or the world for Devas; (2) the earth, or
    the world for men; (3) the world for Asuras; (4) the world for
    Petras; (5) the world for beasts; (6) hell.

    If it be the will of Heaven to bless so limited a number of persons
    at all, and to curse so many, why is Heaven so partial? Even more
    than that! Are there not many who hold a high position without any
    meritorious conduct, while some are placed in a low one in spite of
    their keeping to (the rules of) conduct? Are there not many who are
    rich without any virtues, while some are poor in spite of their
    virtues? Are there not the unjust who are fortunate, while the just
    are unfortunate? Are there not the humane, who die young, while the
    inhuman enjoy long lives? In short, the righteous (are doomed) to
    perish, while the unrighteous prosper! Thus (we must infer) that all
    this depends on the heavenly will, which causes the unrighteous to
    prosper and the righteous to perish. How can there be reward for the
    good (as it is taught in your sacred books),[FN#315] that Heaven
    blesses the good and shows grace to the humble? How can there be
    punishment for the bad (as it is taught in your holy books),[FN#316]
    that Heaven curses the evil and inflicts punishment on the proud?

    [FN#315] Shu King and I King.

    [FN#316] Ibid.

    Again, if even all such evils as wars, treacheries, and rebellions
    depend on the heavenly will, those Sages would be in the wrong who,
    in the statement of their teaching, censure or chastise men, but not
    Heaven or the heavenly will. Therefore, even if Shi[FN#317] is full
    of reproofs against maladministration, while Shu[FN#318] of eulogies
    for the reigns of the wisest monarchs-even if Propriety[FN#319] is
    recommended as a most effectual means of creating peace between the
    governors and the governed, while Music[FN#320] (is recommended as a
    means of) ameliorating the customs and manners of the people--still,
    they can hardly be said to realize the Will on High or to conform to
    the wishes of the Creator. Hence you must acknowledge that those who
    devote themselves to the study of these doctrines are not able to
    trace man to his origin.

    [FN#317] Shu King, a famous book of odes.

    [FN#318] Shu King, the records of the administrations of the wisest
    monarchs of old.

    [FN#319] Li Ki, the book on proprieties and etiquette.

    [FN#320] It is said in Hiao King that music is the best means to
    improve customs and manners.



    There are in the Buddhist doctrines, to state briefly, the five
    grades (of development), beginning with the most superficial, and
    ending with the most profound teachings. (They are as follows

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    The Doctrine for Men and Devas; (2) the Doctrine of the Hinayanists;
    (3) the Mahayana Doctrine of Dharma-laksana; (4) the Mahayana
    Doctrine of the Nihilists[FN#322]; (5) the Ekaydna Doctrine that
    teaches the Ultimate Reality.[FN#323]

    [FN#321] A. 'The imperfect doctrines taught by the Buddha.'

    [FN#322] A. 'These first four doctrines are treated of in this

    [FN#323] A. 'This is mentioned in the third chapter.'

    1. The Doctrine for Men and Devas.

    The Buddha, to meet temporarily the spiritual needs of the
    uninitiated, preached a doctrine concerning good or bad Karma as the
    cause, and its retribution as the effect, in the three existences (of
    the past, the present, and the future). That is, one who commits the
    tenfold sin[FN#324] must be reborn after death in hell, when these
    sins are of the highest grade;[FN#325] among Pretas,[FN#326] when of
    the middle grade; and among animals, when of the lowest grade.

    [FN#324] (1) Taking life, (2) theft, (3) adultery, (4) lying, (5)
    exaggeration, (6) abuse, (7) ambiguous talk, (8) coveting, (9)
    malice, (10) unbelief.

    [FN#325] There are three grades in each of the tenfold sin. For
    instance, the taking of the life of a Buddha, or of a sage, or of a
    parent, etc., is of the highest grade; while to kill fellow-men is of
    the middle; and to kill beasts and birds, etc., is of the lowest.
    Again, to kill any being with pleasure is of the highest grade; while
    to repent after killing is of the middle; and killing by mistake is
    of the lowest.

    [FN#326] Hungry spirits.

    Therefore the Buddha for a temporary purpose made these (uninitiated)
    observe the Five Precepts similar to the Five Virtues[FN#327] of the
    outside doctrine, in order to enable them to escape the three (worst)
    States[FN#328] of Existence, and to be reborn among men. (He also
    taught that) those who cultivate[FN#329] the tenfold virtue[FN#330]
    of the highest grade, and who give alms, and keep the precepts, and
    so forth, are to be born in the Six Celestial Realms of Kama[FN#331]
    while those who practise the Four[FN#332] Dhyanas, the Eight
    Samadhis,[FN#333] are to be reborn in the heavenly worlds of
    Rupa[FN#334] and Arupa. For this reason this doctrine is called the
    doctrine for men and Devas. According to this doctrine Karma is the
    origin of life.[FN#335]

    [FN#327] The five cardinal virtues of Confucianism are quite similar
    to the five precepts of Buddhism, as we see by this table:


    1. Humanity.---1. Not to take life.
    2. Uprightness.---2. Not to steal.
    3. Propriety.---3. Not to be adulterous.
    4. Wisdom.---4. Not to get drunk.
    5. Sincerity.---5. Not to lie.

    [FN#328] (1) Hell, (2) Pretas, (3) Beasts.

    [FN#329] A. 'The Buddhist precepts are different from the Confucian
    teachings in the form of expression, but they agree in their warning
    against the evil and in encouraging the good. The moral conduct of
    the Buddhist can be secured by the cultivation of the five virtues of
    humanity, uprightness, etc., as though people in this country hold up
    their hands joined in the respectable salutation, while the same
    object is attained by those of The Fan, who stand with their bands
    hanging down. Not to kill is humanity. Not to steal is uprightness.
    Not to be adulterous is propriety. Not to lie is sincerity. Not to
    drink spirits nor eat meat is to increase wisdom, keeping mind pure.'

    [FN#330] (1) Not to take life, (2) not to steal, (3) not to be
    adulterous, (4) not to lie, (5) not to exaggerate, (6) not to abuse,
    (7) not to talk ambiguously, (8) not to covet, (9) not to be
    malicious, (10) not to unbelieve.

    [FN#331] Kama-loka, the world of desire, is the first of the Three
    Worlds. It consists of the earth and the six heavenly worlds, all
    the inhabitants of which are subject to sensual desires.

    [FN#332] The Buddhists taught the four Dhyanas, or the four
    different degrees of abstract contemplation, by which the mind could
    free itself from all subjective and objective trammels, until it
    reached a state of absolute absence of unconcentrated thought. The
    practiser of the four Dhyanas would be born in the four regions of
    the Rupa-lokas in accordance with his spiritual state.

    [FN#333] Namely, the above-mentioned four degrees of contemplation,
    and other four deeper ecstatic meditations. The practiser of the
    latter would be born in the four spiritual regions of Arupa-loka in
    accordance with his state of abstraction.

    [FN#334] Rupa-loka, the world of form, is the second of the Three
    Worlds. It consists of eighteen heavens, which were divided into
    four regions. The first Dhyana region comprised the first three of
    the eighteen heavens, the second Dhyana region the next three, the
    third Dhyana region the following three, and the fourth Dhyana region
    the remaining nine.

    Arupa-loka, the world of formlessness, is the third of the Three
    Worlds. It consists of four heavens. The first is called 'the
    heaven of unlimited space,' the second 'the heaven of unlimited
    knowledge,' the third 'the heaven of absolute non-existence,' the
    fourth 'the heaven of neither consciousness nor unconsciousness.'

    A. 'None of heavens, or of hells, or of the worlds of spirits, is
    mentioned in the title of this book, because these worlds are
    entirely different from ours, and absolutely beyond the sight and
    hearing. Ordinary people know not even the phenomena actually
    occurring before them; how could they understand the unseen? So I
    entitled it simply, "The Origin of Man " in agreement with the
    worldly teachings. Now that I treat, however, of the Buddhist
    doctrine, it is reasonable to enumerate these worlds in full.'

    [FN#335] A. 'But there are three sorts of Karmas: (1) The bad, (2)
    the good, (3) the immovable. There are the three periods for
    retribution: (1) In this life, (2) in the next life, (3) in some
    remote future life.'

    Now let me raise some questions by way of objection. Granting that
    one has to be born in the Five States of Existences[FN#336] by virtue
    of Karma produced (in previous lives), is it not doubtful who is the
    author of Karma, and who the recipient of its consequences? If it
    might be said that the eyes, ears, hands, and feet produce Karma,
    then the eyes, ears, hands, and feet of a newly-dead person are still
    as they were. So why do they not see and hear and thus produce Karma?

    [FN#336] The states of--(1) heavenly beings, (2) men, (3) beings in
    hell, (4) hungry spirits, (5) beasts.

    If it be said that it is the mind that produces Karma (I ask), what
    is the mind? If you mean the heart, the heart is a material thing,
    and is located within the body. How can it, by coming quickly into
    the eyes and ears, distinguish the pleasing from the disgusting in
    external objects? If there be no distinction between the pleasing
    and the disgusting, why does it accept the one or reject the other?

    Besides, the heart is as much material and impenetrable as the eyes,
    ears, hands, and feet. How, then, can the heart within freely pass
    to the organs of sense without? How can this one put the others in
    motion, or communicate with them, in order to co-operate in producing
    If it be said that only such passions as joy, anger, love, and hatred
    act through the body and the mouth and enable them to produce Karma,
    (I should say) those passions--joy, anger, and the rest--are too
    transitory, and come and go in a moment. They have no Substance
    (behind their appearances). What, then, is the chief agent that
    produces Karma?

    It might be said that we should not seek after (the author of Karma)
    by taking mind and body separately (as we have just done), because
    body and mind, as a whole, conjointly produce Karma. Who, then,
    after the destruction of body by death, would receive the retribution
    (in the form) of pain or of pleasure?

    If it be assumed that another body is to come into existence after
    death, then the body and mind of the present life, committing sins or
    cultivating virtues, would cause another body and mind in the future
    which would suffer from the pains or enjoy the pleasures.
    Accordingly, those who cultivate virtues would be extremely unlucky,
    while those who commit sins very lucky. How can the divine law of
    causality be so unreasonable? Therefore we (must) acknowledge that
    those who merely follow this doctrine are far from a thorough
    understanding of the origin of life, though they believe in the
    theory of Karma.

    2. The Doctrine of the Hinayanists.

    This doctrine tells us that (both) the body, that is formed of
    matter, and the mind, that thinks and reflects, continually exist
    from eternity to eternity, being destroyed and recreated by means of
    direct or indirect causes, just as the water of a river glides
    continually, or the flame of a lamp keeps burning constantly. Mind
    and body unite themselves temporarily, and seem to be one and
    changeless. The common people, ignorant of all this, are attached to
    (the two combined) as being Atman.[FN#337]

    [FN#337] Atman means ego, or self, on which individuality is based.

    For the sake of this Atman, which they hold to be the most precious
    thing (in the world), they are subject to the Three Poisons Of
    lust,[FN#338] anger,[FN#339] and folly,[FN#340] which (in their turn)
    give impulse to the will and bring forth Karma of all kinds through
    speech and action. Karma being thus produced, no one can evade its
    effects. Consequently all must be born[FN#341] in the Five States of
    Existence either to suffer pain or to enjoy pleasure; some are born
    in the higher places, while others in the lower of the Three

    [FN#338] A. 'The passion that covets fame and gain to keep oneself
    in prosperity.'

    [FN#339] A. 'The passion against disagreeable things, for fear of
    their inflicting injuries on oneself.'

    [FN#340] A. 'Wrong thoughts and inferences.'

    [FN#341] A. 'Different sorts of beings are born by virtue of the
    individualizing Karma.'

    [FN#342] A. 'Worlds are produced by virtue of the Karma common to
    all beings that live in them.'

    When born (in the future lives) they are attached again to the body
    (and mind) as Atman, and become subject to lust and the other two
    passions. Karma is again produced by them, and they have to receive
    its inevitable results. (Thus) body undergoes birth, old age,
    disease, death, and is reborn after death; while the world passes
    through the stages of formation, existence, destruction, and
    emptiness, and is re-formed again after emptiness. Kalpa after
    Kalpa[FN#343] (passes by), life after life (comes on), and the circle
    of continuous rebirths knows no beginning nor end, and resembles the
    pulley for drawing water from the well.[FN#344]

    [FN#343] Kalpa, a mundane cycle, is not reckoned by months and
    years. lt is a period during which a physical universe is formed to
    the moment when another is put into its place.

    A. "The following verses describe how the world was first created in
    the period of emptiness: A strong wind began to blow through empty
    space. Its length and breadth were infinite. It was 16 lakhs thick,
    and so strong that it could not be cut even with a diamond. Its name
    was the world-supporting-wind. The golden clouds of Abhasvara heaven
    (the sixth of eighteen heavens of the Rupa-loka) covered all the
    skies of the Three Thousand Worlds. Down came the heavy rain, each
    drop being as large as the axle of a waggon. The water stood on the
    wind that checked its running down. It was 11 lakhs deep. The first
    layer was made of adamant (by the congealing water). Gradually the
    cloud poured down the rain and filled it. First the Brahma-raja
    worlds, next the Yama-heaven (the third of six heavens of the Kama
    loka), were made. The pure water rose up, driven by the wind, and
    Sumeru, (the central mountain, or axis of the universe) and the seven
    concentric circles of mountains, and so on, were formed. Out of
    dirty sediments the mountains, the four continents, the hells,
    oceans, and outer ring of mountains, were made. This is called the
    formation of the universe. The time of one Increase and one Decrease
    (human life is increased from 10 to 84,000 years, increasing by one
    year at every one hundred years; then it is decreased from 84,000 to
    10 years, decreasing by one year at every one hundred years) elapsed.
    In short, those beings in the second region of Rupa-loka, whose good
    Karma had spent its force, came down on the earth. At first there
    were the 'earth bread' and the wild vine for them. Afterwards they
    could not completely digest rice, and began to excrete and to
    urinate. Thus men were differentiated from women. They divided the
    cultivated land among them. Chiefs were elected; assistants and
    subjects were sought out; hence different classes of people. A
    period of nineteen Increases and Decreases elapsed. Added to the
    above-mentioned period, it amounted to twenty Increases and
    Decreases. This is called the Kalpa of the formation of the universe.

    "Now let us discuss this point. The Kalpa of Emptiness is what the
    Taoist calls the Path of Emptiness. The Path or the Reality,
    however, is not empty, but bright, transcendental, spiritual, and
    omnipresent. Lao Tsz, led by his mistaken idea, called the Kalpa of
    Emptiness the Path; otherwise he did so for the temporary purpose of
    denouncing worldly desires. The wind in the empty space is what the
    Taoist calls the undefinable Gas in the state of Chaos. Therefore
    Lao Tsz said, 'The Path brings forth one.' The golden clouds, the
    first of all physical objects, is (what the Confucianist calls) the
    First Principle. The rain-water standing (on the wind) is the
    production of the Negative Principle. The Positive, united with the
    Negative, brought forth the phenomenal universe. The
    Brahma-raja-loka, the Sumeru, and others, are what they call the
    Heaven. The dirty waters and sediment are the Earth. So Lao Tsz
    said, 'One produces two.' Those in the second region of the
    Rupra-loka, whose good Karma had spent its force, came down upon the
    earth and became human beings. Therefore Lao Tsz said, 'The two
    produce three.' Thus the Three Powers were completed. The
    earth-bread and different classes of people, and so on, are the
    so-called 'production of thousands of things by the Three.' This was
    the time when people lived in eaves or wandered in the wilderness,
    and knew not the use of fire. As it belongs to the remote past of
    the prehistoric age, previous to the reigns of the first three
    Emperors, the traditions handed down to us are neither clear nor
    certain. Many errors crept into them one generation after another,
    and consequently no one of the statements given in the various works
    of scholars agrees with another. Besides, when the Buddhist books
    explain the formation of the Three Thousand Worlds, they do not
    confine themselves merely within the limits of this country. Hence
    their records are entirely different from those of the outsiders
    (which are confined to China).

    "'Existence' means the Kalpa of Existence that lasts twenty Increases
    and Decreases. 'Destruction' means the Kalpa of Destruction that
    lasts also twenty Increases and Decreases. During the first nineteen
    Increases and Decreases living beings are destroyed; while in the
    last worlds are demolished through the three periods of distress (1)
    the period of water, (2) the period of fire, (3) the period of wind.
    'Emptiness' means the Kalpa of Emptiness, during which no beings nor
    worlds exist. This Kalpa also lasts twenty Increases and Decreases."

    [FN#344] A. 'Taoists merely know that there was one Kalpa of
    Emptiness before the formation of this present universe, and point
    out the Emptiness, the Chaos, the primordial Gas, and the rest,
    naming them as the first or the beginningless. But they do not know
    that the universe had already gone through myriads of cycles of
    Kalpas of formation, existence, destruction, and emptiness. Thus
    even the most superficial of the Hinayana doctrines far excels the
    most profound of the outside doctrines.'

    All this is due to Ignorance which does not understand that no bodily
    existence, by its very nature, can be Atman. The reason why it is
    not Atman is this, that its formation is, after all, due to the union
    of matter and mind. Now (let us) examine and analyze (mind and
    body). Matter consists of the four elements of earth, water, fire,
    and wind, while mind consists of the four aggregates of
    perception,[FN#345] consciousness,[FN#346] conception,[FN#347] and

    [FN#345] A. 'It receives both the agreeable and the disagreeable
    impressions from without.' It is Yedana, the second of the five
    Skandhas, or aggregates.

    [FN#346] A. 'It perceives the forms of external objects.' It is
    Samjnya, name, the third of the five aggregates.

    [FN#347] A. 'It acts, one idea changing after another.' It is
    Samskara, the fourth of the five aggregates.

    [FN#348] A. 'It recognizes.' It is Vijnyana, the last of the five

    If all (these elements) be taken as Atman, there must be eight Atmans
    (for each person). More than that! There are many different things,
    even in the element of earth. Now, there are three hundred and sixty
    bones, each one distinct from the other. No one is the same as any
    other, either of the skin, hair, muscles, the liver, the heart, the
    spleen, and the kidneys. Furthermore, there are a great many mental
    qualities each different from the others. Sight is different from
    hearing. Joy is not the same as anger. If we enumerate them, in
    short, one after another, there are eighty thousand passions.[FN#349]

    [FN#349] Eighty thousand simply means a great many.

    As things are thus so innumerable, none can tell which of these
    (without mistake) is to be taken as the Atman. In case all be taken
    as the Atman, there must be hundreds and thousands of Atmans, among
    which there would be as many conflicts and disturbances as there are
    masters living in the one (house of) body. As there exists no body
    nor mind separated from these things, one can never find the Atman,
    even if he seeks for it over and over again.

    Hereupon anyone understands that this life (of ours) is no more than
    the temporary union of numerous elements (mental and physical).
    Originally there is no Atman to distinguish one being from another.
    For whose sake, then, should he be lustful or angry? For whose sake
    should he take life,[FN#350] or commit theft, or give alms, or keep
    precepts? (Thus thinking) at length he sets his mind free from the
    virtues and vices subjected to the passions[FN#351] of the Three
    Worlds, and abides in the discriminative insight into (the nature of)
    the Anatman[FN#352] only.
    By means of that discriminative insight he makes himself pure from
    lust, and the other (two passions) puts an end to various sorts of
    Karma, and realizes the Bhutatathata[FN#353] of Anatman. In brief,
    he attains to the State of Arhat,[FN#354] has his body reduced to
    ashes, his intelligence annihilated, and entirely gets rid of

    [FN#350] A. 'He understands the truth of misery.' The truth of
    Duhkha, or misery, is the first of the four Noble Satyas, or Truths,
    that ought to be realized by the Hinayanists. According to the
    Hinayana doctrine, misery is a necessary concomitant of sentient

    [FN#351] A. 'He destroys Samudaya.' The truth of Samudaya, or
    accumulation, the second of the four Satyas, means that misery is
    accumulated or produced by passions. This truth should be realized
    by the removal of passions.

    [FN#352] A. 'This is the truth of Marga.' The truth of Marga, or
    Path, is the fourth of the four Satyas. There are the eight right
    Paths that lead to the extinction of passions; (1) Right view (to
    discern truth), (2) right thought (or purity of will and thought),
    (3) right speech (free from nonsense and errors), (4) right action,
    (5) right diligence, (6) right meditation, (7) right memory, (8)
    right livelihood.

    [FN#353] A. 'This is the truth of Nirodha.' Nirodha, or destruction,
    the third of the four Satyas, means the extinction of passions.
    Bhutatathati of Anatman means the truth of the non existence of Atma
    or soul, and is the aim and end of the Hinayanist philosophy.

    [FN#354] Arhat, the Killer of thieves (i.e., passions), means one
    who conquered his passions. It means, secondly, one who is exempted
    from birth, or one who is free from transmigration. Thirdly, it
    means one deserving worship. So the Arhat is the highest sage who has
    attained to Nirvana by the destruction of all passions.

    According to the doctrine of this school the two aggregates, material
    and spiritual, together with lust, anger, and folly, are the origin
    of ourselves and of the world in which we live. There exists nothing
    else, either in the past or in the future, that can be regarded as
    the origin.

    Now let us say (a few words) by way of refutation. That which
    (always) stands as the origin of life, birth after birth, generation
    after generation, should exist by itself without cessation. Yet the
    Five Vijnyanas[FN#355] cease to perform their functions when they
    lack proper conditions, (while) the Mano-vijnyana[FN#356] is lost at
    times (in unconsciousness). There are none of those four (material)
    elements in the heavenly worlds of Arupa. How, then, is life
    sustained there and kept up in continuous birth after birth?
    Therefore we know that those who devote themselves to the study of
    this doctrine also cannot trace life to its origin.

    [FN#355] A. 'The conditions are the Indriyas and the Visayas, etc.'
    Indriyas are organs of sense, and Visayas are objects on which the
    sense acts. Five Vijnyanas are--(1) The sense of sight, (2) the
    sense of hearing, (3) the sense of smell, (4) the sense of taste, (5)
    the sense of touch.

    [FN#356] Mano-vijnyana is the mind itself, and the last of the six
    Vijnyanas of the Hinayana doctrine. A. '(For instance), in a state
    of trance, in deep slumber, in Nirodha-samapatti (where no thought
    exists), in Asamjnyi-samapatti (in which no consciousness exists),
    and in Avrhaloka (the thirteenth of Brahmalokas).

    3. The Mahayana Doctrine of Dharmalaksana.[FN#357]

    This doctrine tells us that from time immemorial all sentient beings
    naturally have eight different Vijnyanas[FN#358] and the eighth,
    Alaya-vijnyana,[FN#359] is the origin of them. (That is), the Alaya
    suddenly brings forth the 'seeds'[FN#360] of living beings and of the
    world in which they live, and through transformation gives rise to
    the seven Vijnyanas. Each of them causes external objects on which
    it acts to take form and appear. In reality there is nothing
    externally existent. How, then, does Alaya give rise to them through
    transformation? Because, as this doctrine tells us, we habitually
    form the erroneous idea that Atman and external objects exist in
    reality, and it acts upon Alaya and leaves its impressions[FN#361]
    there. Consequently, when Vijnyanas are awakened, these impressions
    (or the seed-ideas) transform and present themselves (before the
    mind's eye) Atman and external objects.

    [FN#357] This school studies in the main the nature of things
    (Dharma), and was so named. The doctrine is based on
    Avatamsaka-sutra and Samdhi-nirmocana-sutra, and was systematized by
    Asamga and Vasu-bandhu. The latter's book,
    Vidyamatra-siddhi-castra-karika, is held to be the best authoritative
    work of the school.

    [FN#358] (1) The sense of sight; (2) the sense of hearing; (3) the
    sense of smell; (4) the sense of taste; (5) the sense of touch; (6)
    Mano-vijnyana (lit., mind-knowledge), or the perceptive faculty; (7)
    Klista-mano-vijnyana (lit., soiled-mind-knowledge), or an
    introspective faculty; (8) Alaya-vijnyana (lit.,
    receptacle-knowledge), or ultimate-mind-substance.

    [FN#359] The first seven Vijnyanas depend on the Alaya, which is
    said to hold all the 'seeds' of physical and mental objects.

    [FN#360] This school is an extreme form of Idealism, and maintains
    that nothing separated from the Alaya can exist externally. The
    mind-substance, from the first, holds the seed ideas of everything,
    and they seem to the non-enlightened mind to be the external
    universe, but are no other than the transformation of the seed-ideas.
    The five senses, and the Mano-vijnyana acting on them, take them for
    external objects really existent, while the seventh Vijnyana mistakes
    the eighth for Atman.

    [FN#361] The non-enlightened mind, habitually thinking that Atman
    and external objects exist, leaves the impression of the seed-ideas
    on its own Alaya.

    Then the sixth and the seventh[FN#362] Vijnyana veiled with Avidya,
    dwelling on them, mistake them for real Atman and the real external
    objects. This (error) may be compared with one diseased[FN#363] in
    the eye, who imagines that he sees various things (floating in the
    air) on account of his illness; or with a dreamer[FN#364] whose
    fanciful thoughts assume various forms of external objects, and
    present themselves before him. While in the dream he fancies that
    there exist external objects in reality, but on awakening he finds
    that they are nothing other than the transformation of his dreaming

    [FN#362] Avidya, or ignorance, which mistakes the illusory phenomena
    for realities.

    [FN#363] A. 'A person with a serious disease sees the vision of
    strange colours, men, and things in his trance.'

    [FN#364] A. 'That a dreamer fancies he sees things is well known to

    So are our lives. They are no other than the transformation of the
    Vijnyanas; but in consequence of illusion, we take them for the Atman
    and external objects existing in reality. From these erroneous ideas
    arise delusive thoughts that lead to the production of Karma; hence
    the round-of rebirth to time without end.[FN#365] When we understand
    these reasons, we can realize the fact that our lives are nothing but
    transformations of the Vijnyanas, and that the (eighth) Vijnyana is
    the origin.[FN#366]

    [FN#365] A. 'As it was detailed above.'

    [FN#366] A. 'An imperfect doctrine, which is refuted later.'

    4. Mahayana Doctrine of the Nihilists.

    This doctrine disproves (both) the Mahayana and the Hinayana
    doctrines above mentioned that adhere to Dharma-laksana, and
    suggestively discloses the truth of Transcendental Reality which is
    to be treated later.[FN#367] Let me state, first of all, what it
    would say in the refutation of Dharma-laksana.

    [FN#367] A. "The nihilistic doctrine is stated not only in the
    various Prajnya-sutras (the books having Prajnya-paramita in their
    titles), but also in almost all Mahayana sutras. The above-mentioned
    three doctrines were preached (by the Buddha) in the three successive
    periods. But this doctrine was not preached at any particular
    period; it was intended to destroy at any time the attachment to the
    phenomenal objects. Therefore Nagarjuna tells us that there are two
    sorts of Prajnyas, the Common and the Special. The Çravakas (lit.,
    hearers) and the Pratyekabuddhas (lit., singly enlightened ones), or
    the Hinayanists, could hear and believe in, with the Bodhisattvas or
    the Mahayanists, the Common Prajnya, as it was intended to destroy
    their attachment to the external objects. Bodhisattvas alone could
    understand the Special Prajnya, as it secretly revealed the Buddha
    nature, or the Absolute. Each of the two great Indian teachers,
    Çilabhadra and Jnyanaprabha, divided the whole teachings of the Buddha
    into three periods. (According to Çilabhadra, A.D. 625, teacher of
    Hiuen Tsang, the Buddha first preached the doctrine of 'existence' to
    the effect that every living being is unreal, but things are real.
    All the Hinayana sutras belong to this period. Next the Buddha
    preached the doctrine of the middle path, in Samdhi-nirmocana-sutra
    and others, to the effect that all the phenomenal universe is unreal,
    but that the mental substance is real. According to Jnyanaprabha,
    the Buddha first preached the doctrine of existence, next that of the
    existence of mental substance, and lastly that of unreality.) One
    says the doctrine of unreality was preached before that of
    Dharma-laksana, while the others say it was preached after. Here I
    adopt the latters' opinion."

    If the external objects which are transformed are unreal, how can the
    Vijnyana, the transformer, be real? If you say the latter is really
    existent, but not the former,[FN#368] then (you assume that) the
    dreaming mind (which is compared with Alaya-vijnyana) is entirely
    different from the objects seen in the dream (which are compared with
    external objects). If they are entirely different, you ought not to
    identify the dream with the things dreamed, nor to identify the
    things dreamed with the dream itself. In other words, they ought to
    have separate existences. (And) when you awake your dream may
    disappear, but the things dreamed would remain.

    [FN#368] A. 'In the following sentences I refute it, making use of
    the simile of the dream.'

    Again, if (you say) that the things dreamed are not identical with
    the dream, then they would be really existent things. If the dream
    is not the same as the things dreamed, in what other form does it
    appear to you? Therefore you must acknowledge that there is every
    reason to believe that both the dreaming mind and the things dreamed
    are equally unreal, and that nothing exists in reality, though it
    seems to you as if there were a seer, and a seen, in a dream.

    Thus those Vijnyanas also would be unreal, because all of them are
    not self-existent realities, their existence being temporary, and
    dependent upon various conditions.

    "There is nothing," (the author of) Madhyamika-castra[FN#369] says,
    "that ever came into existence without direct and indirect causes.
    Therefore there is anything that is not unreal in the world." He
    says again: "Things produced through direct and indirect causes I
    declare to be the very things which are unreal." (The author of)
    Craddhotdada-castra[FN#370] says: "All things in the universe present
    themselves in different forms only on account of false ideas. If
    separated from the (false) ideas and thoughts, no forms of those
    external objects exist." "All the physical forms (ascribed to
    Buddha)," says (the author of) a sutra,[FN#371] "are false and
    unreal. The beings that transcend all forms are called
    Buddhas."[FN#372] Consequently you must acknowledge that mind as
    well as external objects are unreal. This is the eternal truth of
    the Mahayana doctrine. We are driven to the conclusion that
    unreality is the origin of life, if we trace it back according to
    this doctrine.

    [FN#369] The principal textbook of the Madhyamika School, by
    Nagarjuna and Nilanetra, translated into Chinese (A.D. 409) by

    [FN#370] A well-known Mahayana book ascribed to Acvaghosa,
    translated into Chinese by Paramartha. There exists an English
    translation by D. Suzuki.

    [FN#371] Vajracchedha-prajnya-paramita-sutra, of which there exist
    three Chinese translations.

    [FN#372] A. 'Similar passages are found in every book of the
    Mahayana Tripitaka.'

    Now let us say (a few words) to refute this doctrine also. If mind
    as well as external objects be unreal, who is it that knows they are
    so? Again, if there be nothing real in the universe, what is it that
    causes unreal objects to appear? We stand witness to the fact there
    is no one of the unreal things on earth that is not made to appear by
    something real. If there be no water of unchanging fluidity,[FN#373]
    how can there be the unreal and temporary forms of waves? If there
    be no unchanging mirror, bright and clean, how can there be various
    images, unreal and temporary, reflected in it? It is true in sooth
    that the dreaming mind as well as the things dreamed, as said above,
    are equally unreal, but does not that unreal dream necessarily
    presuppose the existence of some (real) sleepers?

    [FN#373] The Absolute is compared with the ocean, and the phenomenal
    universe with the waves.

    Now, if both mind and external objects, as declared above, be nothing
    at all, no- one can tell what it is that causes these unreal
    appearances. Therefore this doctrine, we know, simply serves to
    refute the erroneous theory held by those who are passionately
    attached to Dharma-laksana, but never clearly discloses spiritual
    Reality. So that Mahabheri-harakaparivarta-sutra[FN#374] says as
    follows: "All the sutras that teach the unreality of things belong to
    an imperfect doctrine (of the Buddha).
    Mahaprajnya-paramita-sutra[FN#375] says: "The doctrine of unreality
    is the first entrance-gate to Mahayanism."

    [FN#374] The book was translated into Chinese by Gunabhadra, A.D.

    [FN#375] This is not the direct quotation from the sutra translated
    by Hiuen Tsang. The words are found in Mahaprajnya-paramita-sutra,
    the commentary on the sutra by Nagarjuna.

    When the above-mentioned four doctrines are compared with one another
    in the order of succession, each is more profound than the preceding.
    They are called the superficial, provided that the follower,
    learning them a short while, knows them by himself to be imperfect;
    (but) if he adheres to them as perfect, these same (doctrines) are
    called incomplete. They are (thus) said to be superficial and
    incomplete with regard to the follower.



    5. The Ekayana Doctrine that Teaches the Ultimate Reality.

    This doctrine teaches us that all sentient beings have the Real
    Spirit[FN#377] of Original Enlightenment (within themselves). From
    time immemorial it is unchanging and pure. It is eternally bright,
    and clear, and conscious. It is also named the Buddha-nature, or
    Tathagata-garbha.[FN#378] As it is, however, veiled by illusion from
    time without beginning, (sentient beings) are not conscious of its
    existence, and think that the nature within themselves are
    degenerated. Consequently they are given to bodily pleasures, and
    producing Karma, suffer from birth and death. The great Enlightened
    One, having compassion on them, taught that everything in the
    universe is unreal. He pointed out that the Real Spirit of
    Mysterious Enlightenment (within them) is pure and exactly the same
    as that of Buddha. Therefore he says in Avatamsaka-sutra[FN#379]:
    "There are no sentient beings, the children of Buddha, who are not
    endowed with wisdom of Tathagata;[FN#380] but they cannot attain to
    Enlightenment simply because of illusion and attachment. When they
    are free from illusion, the Universal Intelligence,[FN#381] the
    Natural Intelligence,[FN#382] the Unimpeded Intelligence,[FN#383]
    will be disclosed (in their minds)."

    [FN#376] A. 'The perfect doctrine, in which eternal truth is taught
    by the Buddha.'

    [FN#377] The ultimate reality is conceived by the Mahayanist as an
    entity self-existent, omnipresent, spiritual, impersonal, free from
    all illusions. It may be regarded as something like the universal
    and enlightened soul.

    [FN#378] Tathagata's womb, Tathagata being another name for Buddha.

    [FN#379] The book was translated into Chinese by Buddhabhadra, A.D.

    [FN#380] The highest epithet of the Buddha, meaning one who comes
    into the world like the coming of his predecessors.

    [FN#381] The all-knowing wisdom that is acquired by Enlightenment.

    [FN#382] The inborn wisdom of the Original Enlightenment.

    [FN#383] The wisdom that is acquired by the union of Enlightenment
    with the Original Enlightenment.

    Then he tells a parable of a single grain of minute dust[FN#384]
    containing large volumes of Sutra, equal in dimension of the Great
    Chiliocosmos.[FN#385] The grain is compared with a sentient being,
    and the Sutra with the wisdom of Buddha. Again he says
    later:[FN#386] "Once Tathagata, having observed every sort of
    sentient beings all over the universe, said as follows: 'Wonderful,
    how wonderful! That these various sentient beings, endowed with the
    wisdom of Tathagata, are not conscious of it because of their errors
    and illusions! I shall teach them the sacred truth and make them
    free from illusion for ever. I shall (thus) enable them to find by
    themselves the Great Wisdom of Tathagatha within them and make them
    equal to Buddha.'

    [FN#384] One of the famous parables in the sutra.

    [FN#385] According to the Buddhist literature, one universe
    comprises one sun, one moon, one central mountain or Sumeru, four
    continents, etc. One thousand of these universes form the Small
    Thousand Worlds; one thousand of the Small Thousand Worlds form the
    Middle Thousand Worlds; and the Great Thousand Worlds, or Great
    Chiliocosmos, comprises one thousand of the Middle Thousand Worlds.

    [FN#386] This is not an exact quotation of the sutra.

    Let me say (a few words) about this doctrine by way of criticism. So
    many Kalpas we spent never meeting with this true doctrine, and knew
    not how to trace our life back to its origin. Having been attached
    to nothing but the unreal outward forms, we willingly acknowledged
    ourselves to be a common herd of lowly beings. Some regarded
    themselves as beasts, (while) others as men.

    But now, tracing life to its origin according to the highest
    doctrine, we have fully understood that we ourselves were originally
    Buddhas. Therefore we should act in conformity to Buddha's (action),
    and keep our mind in harmony with his. Lot us betake ourselves once
    more to the source of Enlightened Spirit, restoring ourselves to the
    original Buddhahood. Let us cut off the bond of attachment, and
    remove the illusion that common people are habitually given to.

    Illusion being destroyed,[FN#387] the will to destroy it is also
    removed, and at last there remains nothing to be done (except
    complete peace and joy). This naturally results in Enlightenment,
    whose practical uses are as innumerable as the grains of sand in the
    Ganges. This state is called Buddhahood. We should know that the
    illusory as well as the Enlightened are originally of one and the
    same Real Spirit. How great, how excellent, is the doctrine that
    traces man to such an origin![FN#388]

    [FN#387] The passage occurs in Tao Teh King.

    [FN#388] A. 'Although all of the above-mentioned five doctrines were
    preached by the Buddha Himself, yet there are some that belong to the
    Sudden, while others to the Gradual, Teachings. If there were
    persons of the middle or the lowest grade of understanding, He first
    taught the most superficial doctrine, then the less superficial, and
    "Gradually" led them up to the profound. At the outset of His career
    as a teacher He preached the first doctrine to enable them to give up
    evil and abide by good; next He preached the second and the third
    doctrine that they might remove the Pollution and attain to the
    Purity; and, lastly, He preached the fourth and the fifth doctrine to
    destroy their attachment to unreal forms, and to show the Ultimate
    Reality. (Thus) He reduced (all) the temporary doctrines into the
    eternal one, and taught them how to practise the Law according to the
    eternal and attain to Buddhahood.

    'If there is a person of the highest grade of understanding, he may
    first of all learn the most profound, next the less profound, and,
    lastly, the most superficial doctrine-that is, he may at the outset
    come "Suddenly" to the understanding of the One Reality of True
    Spirit, as it is taught in the fifth doctrine. When the Spiritual
    Reality is disclosed before his mind's eye, he may naturally see that
    it originally transcends all appearances which are unreal, and that
    unrealities appear on account of illusion, their existence depending
    on Reality. Then he must give up evil, practise good, put away
    unrealities by the wisdom of Enlightenment, and reduce them to
    Reality. When unrealities are all gone, and Reality alone remains
    complete, he is called the Dharma-kaya-Buddha.'



    EVEN if Reality is the origin of life, there must be in all
    probability some causes for its coming into existence, as it cannot
    suddenly assume the form of body by accident. In the preceding
    chapters I have refuted the first four doctrines, merely because they
    are imperfect, and in this chapter I shall reconcile the temporary
    with the eternal doctrine. In short, I shall show that even
    Confucianism is in the right.[FN#390] That is to say, from the
    beginning there exists Reality (within all beings), which is one and
    spiritual. It can never be created nor destroyed. It does not
    increase nor decrease itself. It is subject to neither change nor
    decay. Sentient beings, slumbering in (the night of) illusion from
    time immemorial, are not conscious of its existence. As it is hidden
    and veiled, it is named Tathagata-garbha.[FN#391] On this
    Tathagata-garbha the mental phenomena that are subject to growth and
    decay depend.
    Real Spirit, as is stated (in the Acvaghosa's Çastra), that transcends
    creation and destruction, is united with illusion, which is subject
    to creation and destruction; and the one is not absolutely the same
    as nor different from the other. This union (with illusion) has the
    two sides of enlightenment and non -enlightenment,' and is called
    Alaya-vijnyana. Because of non-enlightenment,[FN#392] it first
    arouses itself, and forms some ideas. This activity of the Vijnyana
    is named 'the state of Karma.[FN#393] Furthermore, since one does
    not understand that these ideas are unreal from the beginning, they
    transform themselves into the subject (within) and the object
    (without), into the seer and the seen. One is at a loss how to
    understand that these external objects are no more than the creation
    of his own delusive mind, and believes them to be really existent.
    This is called the erroneous belief in the existence of external
    objects.[FN#394] In consequence of these erroneous beliefs, he
    distinguishes Self and non-self, and at last forms the erroneous
    belief of Atman. Since he is attached to the form of the Self, he
    yearns after various objects agreeable to the sense for the sake of
    the good of his Self. He is offended, (however), with various
    disagreeable objects, and is afraid of the injuries and troubles
    which they bring on him. (Thus) his foolish passions[FN#395] are
    strengthened step by step.

    [FN#389] A. 'The doctrines refuted above are reconciled with the
    real doctrine in this chapter. They are all in the right in their
    pointing to the true origin.'

    [FN#390] A. 'The first section states the fifth doctrine that
    reveals the Reality, and the statements in the following sections are
    the same as the other doctrines, as shown in the notes.'

    [FN#391] A. 'The following statement is similar to the fourth
    doctrine explained above in the refutation of the phenomenal
    existence subject to growth and decay.' Compare Çraddhotpada-castra.

    [FN#392] A. 'The following statement is similar to the doctrine of

    [FN#393] Here Karma simply means an active state; it should be
    distinguished from Karma, produced by actions.

    [FN#394] A. 'The following statement is similar to the second
    doctrine, or Hinayanism.'

    [FN#395] A. 'The following statement is similar to the first
    doctrine for men and Devas.'

    Thus (on one hand) the souls of those who committed the crimes of
    killing, stealing, and so on, are born, by the influence of the bad
    Karma, in hell, or among Pretas, or among beasts, or elsewhere. On
    the other hand, the souls of those who, being afraid of such
    sufferings, or being good-natured, gave alms, kept precepts, and so
    on, undergo Antarabhava[FN#396] by the influence of the good Kharma,
    enter into the womb of their mothers.[FN#397]

    [FN#396] The spiritual existence between this and another life.

    [FN#397] A. 'The following statement is similar to Confucianism and

    There they are endowed with the (so-called) Gas, or material (for
    body).[FN#398] The Gas first consists of four elements[FN#399] and
    it gradually forms various sense-organs. The mind first consists of
    the four aggregates,[FN#400] and it gradually forms various
    Vijnyanas. After the whole course of ten months they are born and
    called men. These are our present bodies and minds. Therefore we
    must know that body and mind has each its own origin, and that the
    two, being united, form one human being. They are born among Devas
    and Asuras, and so on in a manner almost similar to this.

    [FN#398] A. 'This harmonizes with the outside opinion that Gas is
    the origin.'

    [FN#399] (1) Earth, (2) water, (3) fire, (4) air.

    [FN#400] (1) Perception, (2) consciousness, (3) conception, (4)

    Though we are born among men by virtue of 'the generalizing
    Karma,'[FN#401] yet, by the influence of 'the particularizing
    Karma,'[FN#402] some are placed in a high rank, while others in a
    low; some are poor, while others rich; some enjoy a long life, while
    others die in youth; some are sickly, while others healthy; some are
    rising, while others are falling; some suffer from pains, while
    others enjoy pleasures. For instance, reverence or indolence in the
    previous existence, working as the cause, brings forth high birth or
    low in the present as the effect. So also benevolence in the past
    results in long life in the present; the taking of life, a short
    life; the giving of alms, richness, miserliness, Poverty. There are
    so many particular cases of retribution that cannot be mentioned in
    detail. Hence there are some who happen to be unfortunate, doing no
    evil, while others fortunate, doing no good in the present life. So
    also some enjoy a long life, in spite of their inhuman conduct; while
    others die young, in spite of their taking no life, and so forth. As
    all this is predestinated by 'the particularizing Karma' produced in
    the past, it would seem to occur naturally, quite independent of
    one's actions in the present life. Outside scholars ignorant of the
    previous existences, relying simply on their observations, believe it
    to be nothing more than natural.[FN#403]

    [FN#401] The Karma that determines different classes of beings, such
    as men, beasts, Pretas, etc.

    [FN#402] The Karma that determines the particular state of an
    individual in the world.

    [FN#403] A. 'This harmonizes with the outside opinion that
    everything occurs naturally.'

    Besides, there are some who cultivated virtues in the earlier, and
    committed crimes in the later, stages of their past existences; while
    others were vicious in youth, and virtuous in old age. In
    consequence, some are happy in youth, being rich and noble, but
    unhappy in old age, being poor and low in the present life; while
    others lead poor and miserable lives when young, but grow rich and
    noble when old, and so on. Hence outside scholars come to believe
    that one's prosperity or adversity merely depends on a heavenly

    [FN#404] A. 'This harmonizes with the outside opinion that
    everything depends on providence.'

    The body with which man is endowed, when traced step by step to its
    origin, proves to be nothing but one primordial Gas in its
    undeveloped state. And the mind with which man thinks, when traced
    step by step to its source, proves to be nothing but the One Real
    Spirit. To tell the truth, there exists nothing outside of Spirit,
    and even the Primordial Gas is also a mode of it, for it is one of
    the external objects projected by the above-stated Vijnyanas, and is
    one of the mental images of Alaya, out of whose idea, when it is in
    the state of Karma, come both the subject and the object. As the
    subject developed itself, the feebler ideas grow stronger step by
    step, and form erroneous beliefs that end in the production of
    Karma.[FN#405] Similarly, the object increases in size, the finer
    objects grow gradually grosser, and gives rise to unreal things that
    end in the formation[FN#406] of Heaven and Earth. When Karma is ripe
    enough, one is endowed by father and mother with sperm and ovum,
    which, united with his consciousness under the influence of Karma,
    completes a human form.

    [FN#405] A. 'As above stated.'

    [FN#406] A. "In the beginning, according to the outside school,
    there was 'the great changeableness,' which underwent fivefold
    evolutions, and brought out the Five Principles. Out of that
    Principle, which they call the Great Path of Nature, came the two
    subordinate principles of the Positive and the Negative. They seem
    to explain the Ultimate Reality, but the Path, in fact, no more than
    the 'perceiving division' of the Alaya. The so-called primordial Gas
    seems to be the first idea in the awakening Alaya, but it is a mere
    external object."

    According to this view (of Dharmalaksana), things brought forth
    through the transformations of Alaya and the other Vijnyanas are
    divided into two parts; one part (remaining), united with Alaya and
    the other Vijnyanas, becomes man, while the other, becoming separated
    from them, becomes Heaven, Earth, mountains, rivers, countries, and
    towns. (Thus) man is the outcome of the union of the two; this is
    the reason why he alone of the Three Powers is spiritual. This was
    taught by the Buddha[FN#407] himself when he stated that there
    existed two different kinds of the four elements--the internal and
    the external.

    [FN#407] Ratnakuta-sutra (?), translated into Chinese by Jnyanagupta.

    Alas! O ye half-educated scholars who adhere to imperfect doctrines,
    each of which conflicts with another! Ye that seek after truth, if
    ye would attain to Buddhahood, clearly understand which is the
    subtler and which is the grosser (form of illusive ideas), which is
    the originator and which is the originated. (Then) give ye up the
    originated and return ye to the originator, and to reflect on the
    Spirit, the Source (of all). When the grosser is exterminated and
    the subtler removed, the wonderful wisdom of spirit is disclosed, and
    nothing is beyond its understanding. This is called the
    Dharma-sambhoga-kaya. It can of itself transform itself and appear
    among men in numberless ways. This is called the Nirmana-kaya of

    [FN#408] Every Buddha has three bodies: (1) Dharma-kaya, or
    spiritual body; (2) Sambhoga-kaya, or the body of compensation; (3)
    Nirmana-kaya, or the body capable of transformation.

    THE END.
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement

    to hide all adverts.
  3. EvilPoet I am what I am Registered Senior Member

    Doesn't zen philosophy, etc. belong in the eastern philosophy forum?
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement

    to hide all adverts.
  5. Adam §Þ@ç€ MØnk€¥ Registered Senior Member


    Geography is irrelevent.
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement

    to hide all adverts.
  7. Slacker47 Paint it Black Registered Senior Member

    How do you always say the right things at the most pertinent moments? Much respect.
  8. EvilPoet I am what I am Registered Senior Member


    If you don't mind my asking, what is the point of your post?
  9. Adam §Þ@ç€ MØnk€¥ Registered Senior Member


    Did you find it interesting and/or useful? If so, there is the point. If not, well, perhaps someone else will.
  10. Xev Registered Senior Member

    Geography is irrelevent. Besides, it makes this forum look purty.

    Nice, Adam. Do you have any info on Bushido?
  11. Adam §Þ@ç€ MØnk€¥ Registered Senior Member

    Probably the best thing to read about Bushido:

    However, it is important to realise that all the idealised notions of Bushido were just that, idealised. The samurai were aristocrats in a feudal society. The majority did not actually practice swordplay at all; of those who did, most did it only as a sport. The most famous, Musashi, was one of the few who actually fought regularly, and he was a complete prick. The majority of the samurai who actually fought, when in battle, acted as officers, directed battle from the rear. The really important thing to remember is that they were aristocrats in general, and treated the peasants like crap, whch is why they had a revolution, and why in one battle the Peoples' Army shot and killed 30,000 very stupid samurai.

    Other interesting links:
  12. EvilPoet I am what I am Registered Senior Member


    Yes, I find it very interesting and useful, I also thought others might too. Which is why I posted this link in the eastern philosophy forum. I was just curious is all - no biggy. Thanks for your reply, much appreciated.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

  13. BLASTOFF Registered Senior Member

    XEV bushidou is the code of the samuria.
  14. Adam §Þ@ç€ MØnk€¥ Registered Senior Member


Share This Page