That may well be Asexperia's own blog. More than likely, in fact, given that it has a post about "Magnitive" as well.
That postulate is proven false by simple experiment. When actual experiments demonstrate that a postulate is wrong, then you abandon it and get back to work.
Thanks NotEinstein. My blog about Philochrony has had visitors from Germany, USA, United Kingdom, between others last week.
Christ almighty... He's actually educated, but stupid as flaccid noodle. God help us all. Edit: Belief in God nonwithstanding - there are only so many adjectives in the world to describe blatant stupidity.
So what? So did countless other pointless blogs. The Flat Earth Society had more hits than you, and they are just as pointless.
My blog in Spanish "Filocronia", at this moment, has 104,895 views around the world, including USA, Russia, France, China, and others; where the official language isn't Spanish.
I agree I did the ol Google dance and came up with that link and as you so eloquently put it bullshite (or my term Cowpat) I do like the term Natural Science Guess most scientists would be practicing Unnatural Science Perhaps the thread should be called The Perfect Cuckoo Clock Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Sorry, views mean web bots. If you insert enough popular buzzwords in your content, it can't help but get hits from Google. Don't mistake those for interested visitors. Asexperia, you have uttered quite a few assertions that are demonstrably, factually wrong, and you have demonstrated a lack of understanding of physics. None of that stops you from starting a blog/website and posting whatever you want. The Flat Earth Society gets far more than 100,000 views That doesn't make it science.
It's the other way around. It doesn't affect the perception of the observers, who each and all see the world behaving as it always has - it affects the time and space in which they do the perceiving. It's the mathematics of time and space that inform us of this effect. Without the math, we probably would never have caught on.
2nd postulate of the Philochrony: Speed affects clocks, not time. A change in time is, for example, 10 seconds in the past or 10 seconds into the future. Clocks of the GPS are always in the present.
Actually GPS has to make micro adjustments as satellites experience slight time dilatation. So once again you are wrong. In fact it's a good job your crackpot theories are not true - because without our present understanding of relativity - GPS tracking would not even be possible: "Further, the satellites are in orbits high above the Earth, where the curvature of spacetime due to the Earth's mass is less than it is at the Earth's surface. A prediction of General Relativity is that clocks closer to a massive object will seem to tick more slowly than those located further away (see the Black Holes lecture). As such, when viewed from the surface of the Earth, the clocks on the satellites appear to be ticking fasterthan identical clocks on the ground. A calculation using General Relativity predicts that the clocks in each GPS satellite should get ahead of ground-based clocks by 45 microseconds per day. The combination of these two relativitic effects means that the clocks on-board each satellite should tick faster than identical clocks on the ground by about 38 microseconds per day (45-7=38)! This sounds small, but the high-precision required of the GPS system requires nanosecond accuracy, and 38 microseconds is 38,000 nanoseconds. If these effects were not properly taken into account, a navigational fix based on the GPS constellation would be false after only 2 minutes, and errors in global positions would continue to accumulate at a rate of about 10 kilometers each day! The whole system would be utterly worthless for navigation in a very short time." http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Unit5/gps.html
Did you ever wonder how speed knows every single conceivable type of clock and is able to only slow the clock down and nothing else? The bottom line here is that you are just ignorant and proud of it and you even have a super cool blog to share your ignorance. How lovely....
And nobody has challenged how Time runs slower at the bottom of a tall building (not by much but with today's instruments measurable) than at the top of the building Why does the whole of the building remain in the present? What stops the bottom of the building slipping into the past while the top moves into the future? Oh well back to the drawing board Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
I rented in a block of flats like that... the top was the penthouse, owned by a rich guy - hi-tech everything. The further down you get the more you got transported back to the 1970s. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
The waiting is the subjective form of duration. The waiting is the mental attitude front the possibility of the occurrence of an event in the future. I have been waiting for 2 hours. She waited for 10 years.
Not exactly what I had in mind but I like it Will wait a little longer Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
You have yet to provide a single rebuttal based on scientific evidence. You have not responded to a single one of the challenges people have made regarding your assertions (your comments regarding GPS as an example is demonstrably wrong). You may feel that your simplified 'thought experiments' are a valid form of evidence - however setting up a website that provides information that is patiently wrong is both irresponsible and immoral - you describe yourself as a psychologist, yet have no ethics regarding responsibility and/or the provision of scientific evidence to back up your assertions.
