The Palin scam

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Syzygys, Oct 7, 2011.

  1. Syzygys As a mother, I am telling you Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,671
    According to her daughter, she knew back in June that she wasn't going to run, nevertheless her Superpac had been asking for donations until a few days ago.

    That is outright fraud in my book, but what do we expect from Reps???
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. superstring01 Moderator

    Messages:
    12,110
    I'm not sure it rises to the level of outright fraud, though it is certainly disingenuous and--on my part--the only part I'm surprised about is the fact that you seem surprised about the whole thing.

    While Sarah Palin seems to be the worst of the worst in the American political scene (which--I grudgingly admit--puts her lower than Magda Goebbels Bachmann), posturing to run for president to make money for their PAC/SuperPAC as well as to make their name more marketable is American as apple pie. (Saying that it's as American as Crackwhores is probably a more apropos comparison, though).

    ~String
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Tiassa Let us not launch the boat ... Staff Member

    Messages:
    36,553
    Murmur and Gasp

    One could suggest it surprising that her supporters fell for it. But then one remembers that they are Palin supporters. In that light, it's not so surprising.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Syzygys As a mother, I am telling you Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,671
    Did I really look surprised? Well, we have to give her credit for successfully milking the idiot donors. The August bus tour was so obviously a family vacation, paid by the well "we the people".
    I actually miss her not running. She would add more color and dilute the field. That's what we call win-win, rarity in Rep circles...
     
  8. wlminex Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1,587
    Syz:

    That is outright fraud in my book, but what do we expect from Reps???

    How's about that Dems fraud of . . . . "labor unions collect member dues . . . then unions contribute $$$ to Dems . . . then Dems support labor unions . . . ?" thingy?
     
  9. spidergoat Liddle' Dick Tater Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    53,966
    That's also legal unfortunately. But the money is far less than Rep. donors can afford.
     
  10. joepistole Deacon Blues Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    22,910
    How about the US Chamber of Commerce fraud, collect dues and then contribute to Republicans; then Republicans support the US Chamber of Commerce. Now repeat that several thousandfold for all of the lobbyist and corporate PACs throughtout the nation and put that into some perspective.
     
  11. wlminex Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1,587
    . . . LOTS more union members than COC members . . . I'd guess!
     
    Last edited: Oct 8, 2011
  12. joepistole Deacon Blues Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    22,910
    My guess is you had trouble reading the part about the PACs.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    And my guess is when you add the money spent, corporate money dwarfs anything mustered by unions.
     
  13. wlminex Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1,587
    . . . never been in a PAC . . . COC . . . or a union (I'm one of those bastardly Independents!) . . .so "I guess" you got me there!
     
  14. joepistole Deacon Blues Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    22,910
    Judging by your posts, your are definately not one of those "independent" folks. And I don't know what your membership status in any of the organizations you listed has to do with being independent.
     
  15. wlminex Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1,587
    . . . I am "registered" as an Independent . . . au contraire . . . there are folks on both political sides that I like . . .and others (on both sides) that I do not like . . .I have to say (not to you, but in general) however, that I really dislike (not hate) ignorance . . . but that seems to be a irresolvable issue (i.e., human condition)!
     
    Last edited: Oct 8, 2011
  16. Syzygys As a mother, I am telling you Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,671
    Well, technically it is not a fraud until she announces that she wouldn't run. She could also change her mind, like 100 times, I guess...
     
  17. Asguard Kiss my dark side Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,049
    Isnt this another reason to have public funding for election campains? If you can only use the money to pay media companies and other set items and if you dont run unless there are extraordionary cirumstances (death, illness, mental breakdown ect) then you are liable to refund the state for any funding it has provided you couldnt do this
     
  18. superstring01 Moderator

    Messages:
    12,110
    Yes.

    But under the current Constitution, it would require an amendment and that is highly unlikely.

    ~String
     
  19. Ganymede Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,322
    Of course it is. Unfortunately pols on both sides engage in unethical behavior. So there for it will continue to be business as usual.
     
  20. dumbest man on earth Real Eyes Realize Real Lies Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,444
    Repulicrats and Democans, are "Special". The rules they create do not apply to "Special" people. Nothing to see here! Move along, please! The MLB "World Series" is going on down the street!
     

Share This Page