Maybe I didn't understand the article but my understanding is that they are claiming God is another name for nature or physics. No where did I see that God was personified. Again the definition that God is another name for nature, reality or physics, was from the article. My personal definition of God is something involving mythology, I haven't spent that much time thinking about it in recent years. I did not see where the idea of God in that article included a conscience being or individual. The seemed to derogatorally call such a being a "super hero". I did skim the article so maybe I missed it. But it sounds like you are interpreting the article to define God as the creator and master of the universe, so why is this article different than any other theists concept of God.