# The impossibility of eternity.

Discussion in 'The Cesspool' started by TheFrogger, Sep 18, 2018.

Not open for further replies.
1. ### TheFroggerValued Senior Member

Messages:
1,596
Why?? : o(

A computer WOULD stop counting: they have a maximum number. As for the field of mathematics...?

3. ### sideshowbobSorry, wrong number.Valued Senior Member

Messages:
5,627
If they didn't run, they didn't run. Something that didn't happen didn't take 0.00 seconds. It just didn't happen.

5. ### TheFroggerValued Senior Member

Messages:
1,596
But they entered the race.

7. ### sideshowbobSorry, wrong number.Valued Senior Member

Messages:
5,627
If they didn't finish the race, you can't attribute a time.

8. ### TheFroggerValued Senior Member

Messages:
1,596
They finished as or before they began.

9. ### sideshowbobSorry, wrong number.Valued Senior Member

Messages:
5,627
No. They didn't finish at all.

You could say that you started to build a cold-fusion reactor at 12:00 pm on January 1, 2018 but until you actually finish the build you can't say how long the build took.

10. ### TheFroggerValued Senior Member

Messages:
1,596
For what it's worth Rainbow Singularity, the equation for the program you mentioned is n=n+1.

Fair argument SideshowBob.

11. ### DaveC426913Valued Senior Member

Messages:
12,312
"Fastest" is defined as speed. Speed is distance over time.
Since the denominator in this case is zero (zero time), and you can't divide by zero, his speed is undefined.

Not
zero, undefined.

12. ### TheFroggerValued Senior Member

Messages:
1,596
Who can't divide by zero? Add one to what you're dividing, add one to what you're dividing by, and subtract one from the total. (+1÷+1)-1.

It's very simple. I can't believe you didn't know that. Now I've told you why don't you see if you can ever discover the answer for yourself. ☺

13. ### sideshowbobSorry, wrong number.Valued Senior Member

Messages:
5,627
Try 2 / 3:
(2 + 1) / (3 + 1) = (3 / 4) ; (3 / 4) - 1 = (-1 / 4) wrong answer​

14. ### TheFroggerValued Senior Member

Messages:
1,596
You're dividing two by three by zero. ☺

15. ### DaveC426913Valued Senior Member

Messages:
12,312
So let's divide 4 by 0 using your "logic":

((4+1) / (0+1)) -1
= (5/1) -1
= 5-1
= 4

So, it's your assertion that four divided by zero equals ... four.

That's awesome. Because four divided one also equals four.

You have just "proven" that 0==1:

And you can do that for any number on the number scale.

You have just "proven" that all numbers are equal.

You were joking of course.

Last edited: Sep 22, 2018
16. ### sideshowbobSorry, wrong number.Valued Senior Member

Messages:
5,627
No, I'm just dividing two by three using your method. If your method supposedly works for dividing by zero, why doesn't it work for dividing by three?

17. ### DaveC426913Valued Senior Member

Messages:
12,312
He's not serious.

He will recant after reading post 32, which uses his logic rigorously, and results in a complete breakdown of the number system.

18. ### sideshowbobSorry, wrong number.Valued Senior Member

Messages:
5,627
I invoke Poe's Law.

Messages:
12,312
Granted.

20. ### DaveC426913Valued Senior Member

Messages:
12,312
Also, reported, for peddling silly nonsense in Physics and Math Forum.

21. ### TheFroggerValued Senior Member

Messages:
1,596
I am serious!

Last edited by a moderator: Sep 22, 2018
22. ### DaveC426913Valued Senior Member

Messages:
12,312
Stay in school. You won't regret it when you're older.

Michael 345 and sideshowbob like this.
23. ### Michael 345New year. PRESENT is 69 years oldValued Senior Member

Messages:
7,710
Either of you two know if he went to the same school as the idiot Terence Hill? of 1 X 1 = 2 fame?

Love to set up a Maths Off between those two