The gig is up.

I think you could be onto something

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

just replaying the same general principles of your argument back at you

sorry if it offends.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

yours of course - but hey, if you forgot that you had an argument, that's cool ....
(BTW if you are going to start playing with jpeg'd fonts you do realize that you won't have access to spellchecker, yes?)

 

Picture this scenario. A patient comes to the doctor complaining about back pain. The doctor goes through all possible tests, but cannot see anything. Yet the back pain is real to the patient, even though the best technology cannot see it.

In the case of the back pain, we may not be able to see it from the outside, so we can satisfy the easiest level of proof. Proof will require climbing inside the other person's skin and experiencing what they experience to make sure this is not a trick. But this is beyond the state of the art.

We can't see this back pain from the outside, yet it appears to exist, without tangible proof, using the methods of science. Still the doctors, to be safe, may give the person pain killers, less technical limitations, result in the wrong diagnosis.

 

Sorry you lost me, what is your point, because doctors know via years of evidence that people have back problems, that don't necessarily have a cause at first diagnosis. Enlighten me to what your trying to suggest, please!

 

that there is only evidence and no proof..

 

Wow! just wow! so you think back pain doesn't exist.
http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/back-pain/Pages/Introduction.aspx
http://orthopedics.about.com/cs/backpain/a/backpain.htm
Back pain can be caused by walking awkwardly, by stepping down from somewhere, and yes it can be psychological.