The Future of computing: Probabilistic?

Discussion in 'Intelligence & Machines' started by sentrynox, Jul 29, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. sentrynox Registered Member

    Messages:
    55
    Scientist in France and Singapore are working on processors mimicking the pattern of human neocortex, which seems to calculate probabilities and assigning weights to each of ones, thus push in a kind of exploration mode filtered through a cultural prism.

    They intend to use such processors for applications that do not necessarly needs true answers, but where truer than false answers are acceptable, like in graphic GPU.

    This will have for effects to decrease the work load of those processors and increase their efficiency compare to the old architecture using pipelines...

    Anyhow, any ideas if you think that it has potentials?

    For me I was thinking that neuronal computers where the thing that was mimicking the best our brain, but it seems not after all...

    So where are we heading?
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    It's already being done through software:
    http://www.amazon.com/Fuzzy-Thinking-New-Science-Logic/dp/078688021X

    Potentials?
    It's already in use.
    Read the book.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. kmguru Staff Member

    Messages:
    11,757
    Fuzzy Logic has been around for many years.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Gustav Banned Banned

    Messages:
    12,575
    if this then that?
    what new about that?
    fuzzy sounds like old shit in new clothes
    allowing for more variables does not require gratuitous jargon

    no thanks
    author sounds like a pompous little fucker with new age pretensions
    fuck him
     
  8. baftan ******* Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,135
    We are boldly heading where no man has gone before.
     
  9. sentrynox Registered Member

    Messages:
    55
    Chips already works with this tech...

    Actually, I sees in this a very efficient way to do computing, if you mix neuronal networks with this algorithm you could make a computer that uses much less energy to solve problems than anything we have now!

    Simply because the computer won't need all the super calculus power behind today's super computers to find a possible, most likely answer...
     
  10. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    Nope, nothing "new age" about it.
    It's how humans think.
    For example at point is a person classed as "tall"?
    There isn't a cut-off point e.g. 5'9" is short, anything above that is tall - it's about relative values.
    Hot/cold, deep/shallow...
    It's merely an acknowledgement that real life (and thinking) isn't digital, it's not yes/ no, on/off it's sort-of and mostly and yes but.
     
  11. Gustav Banned Banned

    Messages:
    12,575

    wrong
    it is how kosko thinks
    fuzzy=buddha=ying yang


    yes there is
    establish a median then categorize
    nothing arbitrary about that

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!




    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    why hot or cold?


    well alright
    lets not get carried away tho
     
  12. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    I never noticed that crap when I read the book.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Unless your friends are all sub-median and some of them are STILL taller than you...
    Tallness is relative.

    Thermostat settings...

    Not?
    That's what we're here for!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page