The first experimental measurement of God; to a 2-decimal point accuracy

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by George E Hammond, Jan 16, 2022.

  1. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    389
    [George Hammond MS physics]
    ... Dave,
    like Einstein, I am a theoretical physicist and not an experimental physicist. If you were querying Einstein, you would not ask him "what experiments did he perform?", or "what telescopes did he use?", Don't be ridiculous, the experiments were done by Leverrier, Eddington, Hubble and scores of others! Einstein was merely the theorist who analyzed the data and discovered the theory of relativity from it !
    ... The same thing is true of the "Scientific Proof of God" (SPOG) that Hammond has discovered. The data comes from hundreds, even thousands of other experimental researchers, mainly in the field of psychology using desktop computers in 20 foreign countries and languages, for 50 years, administering psychological tests to millions of people. All of that data has been published in the peer-reviewed literature and is in libraries and online worldwide.
    ... And I know that you have made the statement that "you can't scientifically prove anything from psychology", but authoritative majority opinion rules against your opinion. In 1982 the prestigious International Science Council (ISC) admitted the International Union of Psychological Sciences (UPsyS) to full membership, de facto recognizing Psychology as a "science".
    ... And today, the center of research psychology is highly computerized psychometric testing worldwide by thousands of researchers and they have discovered that there is an
    "eigenvector pyramid" at the center of Psychology at the top of which is a lone, top, single eigenvector known as the "GFP".
    ... If you type ("GFP" Psychology) into a Google search engine it will return over 1 million hits, the discovery is so well known. And yet, the whole field of psychology is rancorously debating what exactly the GFP is? They don't know! It is a mystery!
    ... And this is where yours truly George Hammond physicist enters the picture, like Einstein 100 years before him, and discovers the true identity of the GFP, and it turns out that it can be overwhelmingly scientifically proved that: The GFP is identically the God of the Bible
    ... So here we are Dave, and you will have to stop asking me about "my experiments", the experiments have been done by thousands of other experimenters. I am merely the theoretician who has discovered that these experiments constitute the world's first scientific measurement of God. And by the way, this result can be confirmed by other direct physical measurements outside of psychology, to be scientifically correct.
    ... Therefore, I look forward with eager anticipation to reading your next post.
    GH
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,152
    So when you claimed "the first experimental measurement of God", to 2 decimal places, you have done nothing of the kind?
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    389
    ... Exactly wrong exchemist ! Einstein never said he himself performed the experimental measurement of the advance of the perihelion of Mercury, Einstein only said that he theoretically explained it.
    ... Likewise, Hammond never said that he himself spent 50 years in 20 countries using laptop computers measuring millions of people, Hammond only said that he theoretically explained the mysterious result: Namely, Hammond proved that the data constituted the first experimental measurement of God, to 2 decimal point accuracy. QED scientifically proving that there really is a God!
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 72 years oldl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,117
    Do the other YouTube videos do the proving same way?

    ?
     
  8. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,487
    Well no. You are way out of your lane.

    Wanting something to be true - even really, really wanting something to be true - doesn't turn opinion into proof.


    I've given you several chances to back up your baseless rhetoric. You can't, or won't, do so. I will leave you to your echo chamber.

    :unsub: :ignore:
     
    Last edited: Jan 18, 2022
  9. gmilam Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,368
    Seriously?!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  10. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,152
    Right. Einstein did not claim to have made an experimental measurement when he had not done so. Because that would have been a lie. An untruth. A falsehood. It was others who later provided experimental corroboration of what his theory predicted.

    But you have made such a claim, in the title of this thread you started. You even stated the precision of the measurement. For that to be true you or someone has to have made some measurements. So what data is it, determined by someone else if not you, that supports your claim, and how does it do so?
     
  11. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 72 years oldl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,117
    Lot of people on YouTube videos claim their videos prove god with some obscure reasoning

    Only watched tiny bits of some. I'm sure this character would be the most boring

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  12. Kristoffer Giant Hyrax Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,347
    Think this should be moved to pseudo or the cess.
    It's not even close to resembling an alternative theory imo.
     
    sculptor and exchemist like this.
  13. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,152
    No indeed. The poor chap has been hammering on at this for over 15 years, apparently. If you look him up on the internet, you get a series of references to stuff he has written, none of it peer reviewed, and quite a bit in the form of "open letters" trying to gain a hearing from various academics, all to no avail.

    He's clearly a"purple file job", viz. a nutter.
     
  14. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    389
    [George E Hammond MS physics Cape Cod MA]
    ...Exchemist
    has made an egregious misstatement of fact. One of the major papers posted on my website which he refers to, is this one:

    Hammond G.E (1994)
    The Cartesian Theory, Unification of Eysenck and Gray
    in New Ideas In Psychology, Vol 12(2) 153-167 Elsevier Scientific Ltd.. Online copy of published paper is posted at: Elsevier Scientific Ltd. 1994https://tinyurl.com/2wnrjht3
    also a full length free research only copy is located here:
    https://tinyurl.com/28tyke6w

    New Ideas in Psychology is a fully peer-reviewed prominent academic worldwide journal published by the world's largest scientific publisher.
    ... Furthermore, this happens to be a fundamental scientific discovery paper from which I was congratulated by both Hans Eysenck and Jeffrey Gray. A picture of me with Hans Eysenck, the world's most famous living psychologist at the time, is shown on page 1 of this thread.
    GH
     
  15. Beer w/Straw Transcendental Ignorance! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,357
    Still, there is so much that it deserves some looking into.

     
  16. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 72 years oldl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,117
    The character focused on here is better than Mogadon. If Big Pharma could compress his video content millions to be made

    The other videos content the little have seen amount to statements along lines If this then this has to be true

    No science detected

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  17. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,501
    George, I'm on the edge of my seat, how big is God?
     
  18. sculptor Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,264
    It seems that many here are much more tolerant of crackpots than am I.
    My hat is off to you all.
     
  19. Kristoffer Giant Hyrax Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,347
    Must be at least 325ish cm tall if we have to assume he/she/it is 20-30% bigger than the tallest human, but George is a nut so I guess "flæktobre" is just as valid.
     
  20. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    389
    [George E Hammond MS physics Cape Cod MA USA]
    ... Congratulations Kristoffer, you're a fast study indeed ! But I think your arithmetic is slightly off. The way I figure it is this: Assume the average guy in the US is 5'9", or 5.75 feet. Assuming the average growth curve deficit (GCD) worldwide is 15% and then assuming that he is at least 10% genetically taller than the average man, that would make him 125% taller than 5.75 feet, or 7.188 feet, or God is (rounding up) = 7'3" tall. And I can tell you right now, you must look like an angel from heaven !
     
  21. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    389
    [George E Hammond MS physics Cape Cod MA USA]
    ... Excuse that last sentence above. That's a Dragon 13 voice dictation error. What I said was "He must look like an angel from heaven", not "you must look like an angel from heaven".
    ... PS: if there are any strange words in my postings there due to voice dictation errors

    !
     
  22. Beer w/Straw Transcendental Ignorance! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,357
    But what does God look like?
     
  23. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 72 years oldl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,117
    I'm trying to work out, is he the young one in the photo?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     

Share This Page