If you don't like sacred then we can say fundamental... Whatever semantics you like, it is really ok with me. Yes, you are. You have preformed a Lorentz Transform on a time coordinate and not a space coordinate. This is the definition of breaking Lorentz Invariance. The two frames you have described are not linked by a simple Lorentz Transformation, therefore, you have lost the idea that the laws of physics are the same in the two frames. This means you have broken Lorentz Invariance. But don't you see that what you write is completely irrelevant---you have already told me everything you have written is garbage. You have destroyed the manifest Lorentz Invariance of the theory. This is the heart of special relativity. Then maybe you'd read my master's thesis? This is quickly disentegrating into a finger pointing contest, and I am happy to continue, because you prove my point with every post you make. You clearly don't understand special relativity beyond the fact that Einstein invented it. This much is painfully evident. No, I just implied that your ideas carry the same scientific weight as intelligent design. Read it again. If they are filled with the same garbage that you have posted in this thread, then I don't need to read them. Really, Farsight, what would change if I decided to read your ...Explained posts now. I would find the same objections, and you would refuse to hear them as all crackpots do. If anyone is still following the thread, I hope they can see the point that I'm making unfolding here. Farsight refuses to acknowledge that he doesn't know what he's talking about, and MetaKron suddenly knows something about physics.