Discussion in 'Physics & Math' started by cav755, Apr 1, 2014.
Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.
So you are sabotaging wikipedia entries now? That's despicable.
It's the correct interpretation.
Who are you to make such a claim?
Answer: you are not in a position to make such a claim. Or, even: no one person is entitled to such a claim.
This behavior by you is despicable.
Even if you incorrectly believe it is not the correct interpretation it is still a valid interpretation.
You're not getting it: this has nothing to do with whether your interpretation of QM is right. This is about you sabotaging the wikipedia entry. In other contexts, this would be illegal. In this case, it is just in ethical/immoral and despicable.
I added the de Broglie Wave Mechanics/Double Solution interpretation to the "Interpretations of the experiment" section.
Right. If you went to a library and started maliciously editing books or went to an art museum and started painting-over the works, or ran out on the field to disrupt a ball game you would be arrested. Wikipedia's lax security and standards make such attacks possible, with little consequence, but ease of commission does not make the attack any less unethical/immoral and despicable.
If a book describing the interpretations of the double slit experiment was missing the de Broglie wave mechanics interpretation then the book would not be complete.
Again, holding that opinion is not what is at issue here: this is about vandalism. It is despicable.
Under "Interpretations of the experiment" I added the de Broglie wave mechanics interpretation.
No you added your interpretation of de Broglie wave mechanics!
If I knew how I would lodge a complaint with Wiki. When many people go to Wiki they are not looking to find what you think. They expect that what they read has some measure of consensus, among those who know the subject.
Read the quote associated with the article having to do with Steinberg. The article says the results are in line with pilot-wave theory (which wave mechanics is the precursor of) where the particle travels through a single slit and the wave passes through both.
What waves is the hidden medium.
cav755 is a sockpuppet of the banned user MPC755 and has been reported as such.
Seems cav755 was already running into some conflict with the Wikipedia content moderators almost immediately. I added to the talk discussion to make sure everyone there knows what's up with cav's crap, hopefully they'll get rid of him for good. Lame and pathetic, the guy doesn't deserve to ever have his first kiss let alone use the internet.
Just another cunning troll, I thought so.
And I responded with:
"What I have posted here is an explanation of what occurs physically in nature in a double slit experiment according to de Broglie's wave mechanics. I'm not sure why it causes people who consider themselves knowledgeable about physics to go nuts."
Are you being honest here? You honestly don't see why what you did is unethical?
Under the "Interpretations of the experiment" section of the Double slit experiment wiki page I added the de Broglie's wave mechanics interpretation of what occurs physically in nature in a double slit experiment.
Is the issue de Broglie's wave mechanics actually explains what occurs physically in nature in a double slit experiment?
He's been spewing this same nonsense 'forever'. He's a sock puppet of gravitational_aether who was permanently banned from this site. He's spewed this 'same thread' over many sites under many pseudonym. I'd call him intellectually dishonest but you would need to have an intellect to qualify for that.
Separate names with a comma.