The coronavirus response seems somewhat suspicious.

Discussion in 'Conspiracies' started by Holly-May Leslie, Nov 27, 2021.

  1. Holly-May Leslie Registered Member

    Messages:
    304
    I was talking about whichever one's used mRNA.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Holly-May Leslie Registered Member

    Messages:
    304
    well, the vaccine might work. I mean, Brian from school got it and he was fine, except that he got a small lump on his neck.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Holly-May Leslie Registered Member

    Messages:
    304
    Why are you talking about cult's?
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Holly-May Leslie Registered Member

    Messages:
    304
    I'm pretty sure that one would neither respond to being dead, nor need to do so. Why are you talking about death? Is this to imply that coronavirus is dangerous?
     
  8. Holly-May Leslie Registered Member

    Messages:
    304
    Lots of people. Which privilege?
     
  9. Holly-May Leslie Registered Member

    Messages:
    304
    What does run up the Jolly Roger mean?
     
  10. Holly-May Leslie Registered Member

    Messages:
    304
    Well, yes. Dead people might find it a bit tricky to disagree with living people.
     
  11. Seattle Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,947
    This subject fits in nicely with your post about everyone getting along and society leading to "bliss". Dealing with humans is like trying to herd cats. It's a very hard task.

    Covid is a problem because everyone isn't vaccinated. It would still be a small problem for a while but without everyone getting vaccinated it just goes on and on. It gives Covid the opportunity to mutate and the problem just gets worse.

    If you say everyone lets work together for the common good, talk about "freedoms" comes in. If people can't work together to get rid of Covid how can we ever expect humans to agree on how to create a state of "bliss" that everyone agrees with?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    exchemist likes this.
  12. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,706
    I won't attempt to debate a third person who's not on this thread, so I thought I'd just comment on this:

    Seatbelts work. Airbags work. Parachutes work. Condoms work. Airplanes work. Cars work. NONE of them work 100%, and no one thinks they do. Why are vaccines somehow different?
     
    origin, exchemist and cluelusshusbund like this.
  13. Holly-May Leslie Registered Member

    Messages:
    304
    I would say that it is way too easy. And it is fear that really does it.
     
    Last edited: Nov 28, 2021
  14. Holly-May Leslie Registered Member

    Messages:
    304
    Okay. The vaccinated should be fine with that. If they're not then I recommend them separating themselves from the unvaccinated. In fact, that seems to already be happening to a huge extent. It is like these unvaccinated people, (Who are mostly just unvaccinated because they don't trust a rushed experimental vaccine which people are getting threatened into having) are being slowly ostracised from society. It makes no sense, but if they feel safer with no unvaccinated people about, then so be it.
     
  15. Holly-May Leslie Registered Member

    Messages:
    304
    I suppose they are not. Were you under the impression that I thought they were?
     
  16. Seattle Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,947
    Since you feel that it is easy to deal with humans perhaps you could take on this problem. Go and convince all the unvaccinated people to get vaccinated or go and convince all the vaccinated people that the unvaccinated aren't a problem.

    This should be easy.
     
  17. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,706
    Yes. Because during your argument with Sue you said "then it doesn't work." That indicates you believe it does not work. If you have since changed your opinion, and now think they DO work (even if they are not 100%) then good for you!
     
    Last edited: Nov 28, 2021
    exchemist likes this.
  18. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 72 years oldl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,666
    Ummmmm let's say the vaccine type was being worked up before COVID-19 came along

    Extract

    Messenger RNA, or mRNA, was discovered in the early 1960s; research into how mRNA could be delivered into cells was developed in the 1970s.

    https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2021/the-long-history-of-mrna-vaccines

    Let's also say the groups of people who offered to use themselves as test subjects were tested concurrently not sequentially

    Normally test groups are tested, results poured over then testing moves to the next group. With urgency of COVID-19 groups were tested alongside each other and priority given to analysis

    Rushed NO, method speed up (hastened) YES

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    cluelusshusbund likes this.
  19. Bells Staff Member

    Messages:
    24,133
    Mod Note

    Holly-May Leslie, just a few points..

    Instead of spamming multiple responses, there's a trick that you can use so that your responses are all in the single post.

    If you highlight text or paragraphs, sentences, etc that someone has written that you wish to respond to, you will get a little box appear at the bottom of that highlighted text that says "Reply". If you click on that "reply", it will then create a quoted section and a link to the person you are quoting and you can respond. And instead of hitting post reply, you can keep highlighting and responding in the same chatbox. You know, instead of posting 6 posts to respond to one person's single post. That is considered spamming.

    Please don't do that. That is actually against the rules.

    Also, I noticed that you copied and pasted another person's post and created a different thread without providing a link to Rainbow's post, nor did you differentiate it or even use quotation marks that would attribute it to the author of those words. That's called plagiarism. That is a huge no no. You can edit your opening thread and correctly assign and quote Rainbow's words correctly and provide a link.

    If you fail to do so, I will ping you for plagiarism.

    If you aren't sure about formatting, you can use the rich text format (or similar option) when using this site, or you can make use of the BB Codes if you like to do things old school, which can be found here: http://www.sciforums.com/help/bb-codes

    And one final note..

    We are in the middle of a dangerous pandemic and I take a very dim view of people who post falsehoods or anti-vaxxer arguments or dangerous conspiracies about said pandemic, while on a site that can be viewed by any member of the public.
     
    James R and exchemist like this.
  20. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,374
    Google is your friend.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    candy likes this.
  21. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,280
    my rough guess of death stats is
    south America 8 million
    north American 3 million
    middle east 2 million
    africa (difficult) maybe 5 million maybe 2 million but looking at the rate of omacron
    i might lean more toward 5 million
    asia 15 million

    38 million world wide keeping Europe off the count to add to the margin of error

    rough guess
    based on ready various reports from scientists

    i may have in error lead a poor example
    apologies
     
  22. Beer w/Straw Transcendental Ignorance! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,394
  23. Holly-May Leslie Registered Member

    Messages:
    304
    Fine. Fine. I have changed my views there. I might get the vaccine, as it is more the response which seems dangerous than it. I probably would have gotten it already if it weren't for this freaky response.
     

Share This Page