Proposal: The CD theory of the WTC 7 fall is more scientific than the official theory

Discussion in 'Formal debates' started by Michael Fullerton, Jun 25, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Michael Fullerton Registered Member

    Messages:
    2
    I, Michael Fullerton, challenge any resident scientist with at least a BSc to a debate on the topic "The controlled demolition theory of the 9/11 WTC 7 collapse is more scientific than the official NIST fire theory".

    I suggest the standard rules for the debate.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Carcano Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,865
    Nobody will dare touch this Michael...you hold all the cards.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. MacGyver1968 Fixin' Shit that Ain't Broke Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,028
    I'm full of BS...does that count? I might be interested in debating you.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. AlexG Like nailing Jello to a tree Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,304
    Lock this thread.
     
  8. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    30,198
    This topic has already been widely canvassed on sciforums. For example, see here:

    [thread=87960]WTC Collapses[/thread]

    and here:

    [thread=84951]9/11 Conspiracy thread[/thread]

    and here:

    [thread=90467]9/11 Poll[/thread]

    Thread closed.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page