The Big Bang Never Happened - Make way for Plasma

I just opened a beer

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

ETs don't drink beer :bugeye:

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

How do you know?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Look at them. Do you see any big bellies....?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

yes,

now lets all bow down to the new theory, that is all truth and knwing,


im just playing, ut in all seriousness, i have already thought about this theory and am done philosophising it within my own mind,

unless the plasma is infinite then it still poses the same questions as before, "what before", etc etc blah blah blah,


theorys to disprove theorys, philosophy to disprove philosophy, its kinda funny,


peace.

 

These EU ideas need to be looked at again in light of these new mainstream findings that I have posted on the nature of lightning and other atmospheric plasmas, new astronomic observations on quasars, black holes,and the elemental constituents of space.

Don't these two recent findings of X-rays, Y-rays and neutrons in CG lightning lend support to the Electric Universe idea?

Joe Dwyer Paper:
http://www.lightning.ece.ufl.edu/PDF/Gammarays.pdf


Russian Science News
http://www.informnauka.ru/eng/2005/2...-13-5_65_e.htm


This view of Nova remnant is interesting:
http://www.holoscience.com/news.php?article=88edua1k


As we get more observations of GRBs and X-ray flashes like these our understanding of Stellar and Black hole evolution should get nailed down.
As these results filter in it will be interesting to see how EU theory holds up.
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal...060831-08.html

And this
:Heavy hydrogen find alters galaxy formation theory
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/...n/4117430.html

Also, hopefully the next generation of particle accelerators should bring even more grist for this Plasma based mill.

Erich J. Knight

 

>> the red shift can be shown to be due to anything else other than Doppler >>

Red shifts are due to "spin fields"
which surround all cosmic matter.

 

Hope this link works for the GRB & XRF relationship:


http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v442/n7106/edsumm/e060831-08.html

 

Maybe GAUGE will provide the answers we need for gravitons, and the Axions of Dark Matter too, and we will have all the grist we need to prove or disprove EU:

http://physicsweb.org/articles/news/10/9/1

Also:
I thought this would be supportive of EU views on the Big Bang:

Hypography Science Forums - Big Bang's Afterglow Fails Intergalactic 'Shadow' Test

http://forums.hypography.com/astronomy-news/8252-big-bangs-afterglow-fails-intergalactic-shadow.html

 

I believe Yoda liked Carlsburg. Chubaca? Who knows.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

what does beer got to do with the big bang?

 

Everything! Ever heard of inflation?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

You also need to be REALLY drunk to imagine the Big Bang in the first place!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Never mind all that 5h1t you have quoted there is a simpler proof the big bang never could have occured. Imagine when all the matter in the universe was in a space the size of our solar system - it would have been dense beyond that of a black hole. Time is supposed to stop at the event horizon.
It would therefore have taken an almost infinite time to escape - this oversimplifies the effect but I have kept it short and simple such that you may understand it.

 

What an idiot.

All of the matter in the observable universe was contained in what we would measure as the diameter of a proton or less. It was hot and dense indeed, but not compressed as in a classical black hole. The metrics by which we measure space and time were themselves shrunk down to incredibly tiny propotrions. The "big bang" was the sudden expansion of the metrics of space and time.

 

Instead of "megabrain" this idiot should call himself, quantumind

 

fool, how could it be hot if there was no atomic motion to generate the fucking heat. and how the hell could the entire universe be so damn small, that's just stupid. and if THERE WAS SOMETHING (dense hot shit), then big bang doesn't explain the origin of MATTER/universe!!!!!!

 

Poor child. Let me help. If I have a nice baloon with spots painted on it, and it deflates, the spots move closer together, and the spots themselves get smaller. The spots represent matter. The baloons surface represents space. The space itself is contracting, and therefore the matter is also contracting as it also gets closer together. The relationship is not necessesarily linear.

See? The matter shrinks along with the space. And of course it dosen't explain the origin of the universe! What a silly child!

 

Since the thread has started, and still untill now, the evidence keeps pouring in against the BB theory. The BB theory if falling apart from the evidence colected by NASA's own probes.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Big Bang is Wrong

BB theory under fire

Big Bang's Afterglow Fails an Intergalactic Shadow Test

That last one was the most recent event that has taken place, yet driving the nail in the coffin of BB theory.

 

It's kinda sad in a way. I bet many scientists dedicated their entire lives studying this myth we call "Big Bang"...