the belgian flap 1989 - the skeptical analysis (1)

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience Archive' started by spookz, Dec 11, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Persol I am the great and mighty Zo. Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,946
    Trolls have tear ducts?
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. spookz Banned Banned

    Messages:
    6,390
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. 2inquisitive The Devil is in the details Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,181
    in post by Wes:

    /A little more about FTL and mass. The mass of an object traveling at near light speeds does not increase IN ITS FRAME OF REFERENCE. If you were on a vehicle travelling a steady .999c (not accelerating) you would not feel more massive and neither would the vehicle.

    That is exactly my understanding.

    /If the vehicle was being pushed by a force in a different frame of reference, such as a lasar beam directed from a stationary position or photons hitting a solar sail, then that force would feel the relativistic mass increase.

    That is my understanding as well.

    /If the vehicle were propelled by an on-board power source, it would not feel an relativistic mass increase.

    Here is where I doubt you. Was this discussed in your article? My source of doubt isn't that the ship doesn't "feel" the increase, but that the ship is intrisincly linked to the space-time in which it is trying to accelerate. I would think you cannot isolate your reference frame regarding acceleration when you're trying to accelerate, because to do so you have to apply a force to something . This "something" cannot be within your reference frame as if it were, you would create a new frame of reference by accelerating with respect to the thing that is in your frame of reference. Do you know what I mean? What do you think about that?

    /That does not mean the vehicle could go FTL, but relativistic mass increase is not the limiting factor if the vehicle had an on-board propulsion system.

    I think that's incorrect due to what I just explained above, but maybe you can convince me otherwise.
    =====================================
    Let me see if I can condense my limited understanding and thoughts here. JamesR or others may certainly need to correct
    some points. Special Relativity begins with a frame of reference
    for the observer and another FOR for the relativistic traveler. Each
    views himself, while not undergoing acceleration, to be in a rest
    frame, also known as an inertial frame of reference. The laws of
    physics are the same for each, and unchanged. When the Lorentz
    transformations are applied, this is changed to make all calculations from one observer-independent scale, or frame. This
    is when the infinities arise, such as the infinite mass applied to
    the traveler approaching the speed of light. There is a modification
    of Special Relativity being worked on usually called Doubly Special
    Relativity. It is also known as Special Relativity with two invariant
    scales. It is a work in progress, the specifics of which are not settled upon to my knowledge. Again, I only have very limited
    understanding of all this. Doubly Special Relativity was created to
    explain a seeming violation of Special Relativity by ultra-high-energy cosmic rays, thought to be protons. More or less,
    it adds a means of calculating mass and energy from the frame of
    reference of the relativistic particle. There are different versions of
    DSR around, not having been completed yet. I understand the goal
    of DSR is to place a limit on the amount of mass and energy increases due to relativistic speeds, not the present infinity. At least some of the models do not restrict a particle's velocity to c.
    A google search for Doubly Special Relativity will return results.
    Here is a link to one of the papers by Giovanni Amelino-Camelia.
    It is just the abstract, you will have to download the paper.
    http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0207049
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. VRob Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    658
    Up

    Chucky,

    If you're interested, I suggest you take a look at this incident.
     
  8. Qorl Guest

    DO WE NEED MORE PROOF FOR ALIEN LIFE!!! Not a question.

    SKEPTIC or NONE BELIEVERS or THINKERS WILL SAY;
    Thousands of witnesses, including dozens of gendarmes (national police) and officers of the Belgian Air Force have a DELUSION. Everybody is sick with mental disorders, they all have a SCHIZOPHRENIA, just like QORL.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  9. Gustav Banned Banned

    Messages:
    12,575
    crap
    spookz is a moron
    despite the training, cops are prone to the same errors in judgment at about the same rate as the general public

    aint they all highschoolers? cops are dolts
     
    Last edited: Feb 5, 2006
  10. Communist Hamster Cricetulus griseus leninus Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,026
    It's just schizophrenia, not "a" schizophrenia. And Qorl, you claim to be the alien messiah. That is not a normal thing to do.
     
  11. Stryder Keeper of "good" ideas. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,105
    Theres this new thread locking craze going about, It started when the trolling became so unbearable to so many people that it had to be acted on swiftly. This means all threads that have broken into a slanging match will now be terminated post hence.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page