The Apollo Moon Missions Were Faked

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience Archive' started by FatFreddy, Apr 14, 2012.

  1. David C Scott88's Buddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    75
    Fatfreddy is totally cornered and resorts to more spamming - the broken record of this serial forum spammer ignores the points above. Of all the millions of engineers, physicists or anybody with education really, FF presumes to think that only he can see this and everybody else is paid by NASA to say otherwise.

    Cesspit - there's no hope for somebody so ignorant.
     
  2. Believe Happy medium Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,194
    Agreed, mods this travesty has gone on long enough.
     
  3. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    169
    Objective viewers can see where I addressed those points from post #81 on this thread at JREF.
    http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=2928317&postcount=66

    The same people are asking the same questions with the attitude that I didn't address them on the other forum. People who actually look there will see you all are full-of-it.


    That's all addressed in this post which I've already posted.
    http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4731597&postcount=1090

    You can play dumb about it and try to bury it but the people who click on the link and look at the info will see that I addressed this point.
     
  4. spidergoat alien lie form Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    46,873
    You could videotape any scene on Earth or in space and find some tiny details to pick apart. It's not a valid argument. Get some help man, you're obsessed with nonsense.
     
  5. Read-Only Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,293
    It's much more than just an obsession - if he's actually as serious as he wants us to believe, it's a full-blown DELUSION - and he needs more than just help. He's approaching the point where he's going to need confinement. :bugeye:
     
    Last edited: Apr 25, 2012
  6. David C Scott88's Buddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    75
    You did not answer those questions. And since you made the points here, you need to answer them here so everybody can laugh at your lame answers. You will not do that, because you are totally cornered.

    1/ Jarrah's flag doesn't move until he is level and that buries your whole claim.

    2/ Since you keep repeatedly making the "atmosphere explanation" - kindly give us the physics for this or anything at all! People don't push air waves 4 feet in front of them!

    3/ Your credibility test is rubbish, the Chinese faked it video was made by a man who supports Apollo. Teehee.

    4/ Your so called bubble is misshapen and tumbling around its own axis. Do you agree with this description of it? Explain your answer.

    5/ You cannot offer an explanation for why wave blowers are used, or an example, or any corroborative citations(Chinese spacewalk). Neutral buoyancy uses weights in a diving pool. Got anything?

    No they won't, and you are as usual playing the spam 'n' dumb game without offering replies to questions people are asking you.

    Please explain these laughable contradictions, because you said these statements................

    The Collins Jacket Non Issue
    You said this....

    "Her hair flops up and down"
    followed by -
    "her hair has no tendency to go downward"

    After 50 pages saying there is no zero-g - "If it turns out that there really is some floating"

    "Collins' jacket corner bounces up and down the way it would in gravity"
    followed by -
    "In zero-G the jacket would be bouncing up and down on his back if it were loose"

    Do you have any comments on these because I think you have no clue what you are talking about?
     
  7. Believe Happy medium Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,194
    Why do you think you're turned away everywhere you go? Of all the forums and posts you've linked almost everyone disagrees with you. Are we all in on it too?
     
  8. David C Scott88's Buddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    75
    Enough said. You show no capability at all of answering questions or showing critical thinking skills. You have no scientific background so why should you think that only you can "see" bubbles "not see" moving flag rods and yet the millions of better qualified people in the world see the opposite(cue another list of spammed links telling us that all scientists are wrong/corruptable).

    So yes, it is a waste of time engaging you - you are a lost cause.
     
  9. David C Scott88's Buddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    75
  10. Trippy ALEA IACTA EST Moderator

    Messages:
    10,346
    Jarrah White is a fraud, it's been proven time and time again.
     
  11. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    169
    Those pro-Apollo posters over at JREF are playing the same game you people are playing–insisting that I haven't answered questions when I have. I went ahead and answered them again so they wouldn't be able to bury my posts. Here's the link to where I answered them again.
    http://forums.randi.org/showpost.php?p=8250191&postcount=8333

    When he tried to obfuscate the clear proof that the Chinese spacewalk was faked, he was pretty much discredited and there wasn't much point in continuing. The only thing that matters is what the viewers end up thinking and I think most of them weren't morons.

    Here's where he tried again.
    http://www.politicalforum.com/moon-...20-1969-sir-questions-sir-12.html#post4767755

    The proof that the Chinese spacewalk was faked is so clear that it makes a good objectivity test. You people also failed that test.
     
  12. Believe Happy medium Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,194
    My guess is that you've fail lots of tests in your life.
     
  13. David C Scott88's Buddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    75
    The one playing games is you. Nowhere in that post is actual answers to those 3 points. You can't answer them can you, because you are a lame obfuscating sophist who is cornered. They would laugh you out of the debating hall with that.

    Translation: He destroyed one of my other nutty pet spamming topics, I had no answer to any of the points he raised in that or any of his other posts, so I ran away.

    The imaginary appeal to support that never materialises. Is this forum a disinfo site aimed at perpetuating a fraud:rolleyes:

    A credibility test that fails in itself, since the video you cite as "evidence" was made by a pro-Apollo supporter. LMAO!!

    http://debunking-a-moron.blogspot.co.uk/2011/07/chinese-spacewalks-part-1.html

    Absolutely obliterated, no wonder you ran away.

    Again:

    Please explain these laughable contradictions, because you said these statements................

    The Collins Jacket Non Issue
    You said this....

    "Her hair flops up and down"
    followed by -

    "her hair has no tendency to go downward"

    After 50 pages saying there is no zero-g - "If it turns out that there really is some floating"

    "Collins' jacket corner bounces up and down the way it would in gravity"
    followed by -

    "In zero-G the jacket would be bouncing up and down on his back if it were loose"


    Do you have any comments on these because I think you have no clue what you are talking about?



    Again:

    You did not answer those questions. And since you made the points here, you need to answer them here so everybody can laugh at your lame answers. You will not do that, because you are totally cornered.

    1/ Jarrah's flag doesn't move until he is level and that buries your whole claim. Kindly offer an explanation for why this is so.

    2/ Since you keep repeatedly making the "atmosphere explanation" - kindly give us the physics for this or anything at all! People don't push air waves 4 feet in front of them!

    3/ Your credibility test is rubbish, the Chinese faked it video was made by a man who supports Apollo. Teehee.

    4/ Your so called bubble is misshapen and tumbling around its own axis. Do you agree with this description of it? Explain your answer.

    5/ You cannot offer an explanation for why wave blowers are used, or an example, or any corroborative citations(Chinese spacewalk). Neutral buoyancy uses weights in a diving pool. Got anything?



    Is anyone else seeing a pattern here? A blanket refusal to answer questions and points and a complete lack of coherent argument. Mixed in with carefully cut and pasted duplicate answers on countless fora, we have......Supertroll.
     
  14. MacGyver1968 Fixin' Shit that Ain't Broke Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,942
    Anyone with even a 101 psychological knowledge can see you are schizophrenic.. The belief that all your detractors actually believe in what you say is classic schizophrenic behavior. If your not committed right now...you should be.
     
  15. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    169
    This was posted...
    ...in post #9 of this other thread.
    http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=113514

    I'm going to address it here as that thread is in a section where the Apollo hoax issue is not supposed to be discussed.

    Start watching this video at the 1:57:45 time mark.
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3186616594425246748#docid=5638049439673634422

    The dust plainly doesn't follow a parabolic trajectory. The person who made that post was using the classic disinfo tactic of misrepresenting the evidence in order to sway those viewers who hadn't seen it yet.

    Here's a link to some more evidence of a hoax for people who are new to this issue.
    http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4001964&postcount=1
     
  16. Trippy ALEA IACTA EST Moderator

    Messages:
    10,346
    @ about the 30 minute mark.

    1. The mongolian herdsman is surrounded by divergent shadows.
    2. If you look at the reflection in the faceplate you can see the opposition effect or maybe Heiligenschein
     
    Last edited: May 6, 2012
  17. David C Scott88's Buddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    75
    Incessant spamming snipped.

    I like this video here if you want to get picky about the rover dust arcs.....

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79UAhuN6VPA

    There are two alternatives. Either regolith will rise and fall in a parabolic trajectory, or it will aerosolise and cause suspension. Air will slow it just as much on the way up as on the way down.

    Since we don't see any suspension WHATSOEVER, this leaves the only other possibility. Now the reason why some of the time it may not be visibly parabolic is simply through the chaotic nature of the particles colliding.

    Meanwhile, the supertroll is avoiding the questions here, whilst lying about answering them at JREF.
     
  18. Trippy ALEA IACTA EST Moderator

    Messages:
    10,346
    Opposition effect demonstrated using gravel:
    [​IMG]

    Opposition effect demonstrated using clover leaves:
    [​IMG]
     
  19. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    169
  20. David C Scott88's Buddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    75
    Translation: I am unable to argue with him because he has totally taken my whole argument to pieces, therefore I will make unsubstantiated crap ad hominems and run away from answering him.

    Please advise how you know he is a "disinfo agent", and advise also to whom this is known.

    I think you are a disinfo agent, because you have spent five years making the same claims on hundreds of fora without ever answering major questions asked of you.

    Your reason for discounting somebody's argument because they disbelieve yet another stupid conspiracy theory, whilst they simultaneously destroy that very theory is truly pathetic. I would remind anybody who is watching this, that the man whose video you rely on for your bonkers claim, is in fact a person who knows Apollo landed on the Moon.

    Indeed, your claim that this piece of debris rotating on its axis is a bubble is one of the most obvious cases of "somebody not believing their own argument" you could get.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-M1LRSF62cc

    Please answer the questions you have been asked and explain the dippy contradictions you made pertaining to them.

    Again:
    Please explain these laughable contradictions, because you said these statements................

    The Collins Jacket Non Issue - You said this....

    "Her hair flops up and down"
    followed by -

    "her hair has no tendency to go downward"

    After 50 pages saying there is no zero-g - "If it turns out that there really is some floating"

    "Collins' jacket corner bounces up and down the way it would in gravity"
    followed by -

    "In zero-G the jacket would be bouncing up and down on his back if it were loose"


    Again:
    You did not answer those questions. And since you made the points here, you need to answer them here so everybody can laugh at your lame answers. You will not do that, because you are totally cornered.

    1/ Jarrah's flag doesn't move until he is level and that buries your whole claim. Kindly offer an explanation for why this is so.

    2/ Since you keep repeatedly making the "atmosphere explanation" - kindly give us the physics for this or anything at all! People don't push air waves 4 feet in front of them!

    3/ Your credibility test is rubbish, the Chinese faked it video was made by a man who supports Apollo. Teehee.

    4/ Your so called bubble is misshapen and tumbling around its own axis. Do you agree with this description of it? Explain your answer.

    5/ You cannot offer an explanation for why wave blowers are used, or an example, or any corroborative citations(Chinese spacewalk). Neutral buoyancy uses weights in a diving pool. Got anything?


    The viewers are not swayed by your obfuscation and sophistry, you would be laughed out of the debating hall with your squirming and non-replies.
     

Share This Page