Supernova From Experimentation At Fermilab

Discussion in 'Astronomy, Exobiology, & Cosmology' started by Paul W. Dixon, Feb 28, 2001.

  1. Lamont Cranston Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    137
    No-one's attempted to answer my question about the 14% extra kaons and pions yet..produced in the low energy collision experiments. Don't tell me....nobody knows?
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Neverfly Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,576
    Well, I for one, do not know.

    But even if no one here does know, what would that signify?

    Ask CERN, not an internet forum. Ask the Experts, not laymen.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Lamont Cranston Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    137
    CERN released the infomation on the "extra particles" last month. For whatever reason, they chose not to hypothesise publicly on the new data. If they had, they would greatly help their case. Plus I am sure that there are people reading this thread who could at least hazard guesses.

    The problem is that all our minds have been so numbed by the publicity and contradictory arguments surrounding all this that we have forgotten to ask questions when hard data does become available. That's sad.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Neverfly Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,576
    Their Case?! What case?
    That you hypothesize that these 14% PROVES that mosquito impacts will suddenly and magically transmogrify into SuperNova or Black Holes?!

    They are not on the defense here. Not from you, especially.

    Cern is releasing their data, properly. That is the point of experimentation. Your paranoia notwithstanding.

    What is sad is how, in spite of your claims being in complete contradiction of the data, how you refuse to recognize your mistakes.
    The only contradictory arguments are yours and others ignorance of how particle physics works. That theses squeaky wheels are uneducated is not CERN's problem nor is CERN obligated to them.

    You seem to want to imply that this 14% variance is somehow going to destroy the world or something. Therefor, the burden of proof is on YOU to show that such is the case, not on them to prove that it is not.

    Get To Work.
     
  8. Lamont Cranston Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    137
    Well I'm not a particle physicist. Though I am willing to start from scratch...can you recommend a good book to start on...seriously?

    I'm not suggesting that a 14% variance is going to destroy the world. But it already proves there are loopholes in CERN's understanding of the systems they are working with.
     
  9. Neverfly Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,576
    Seriously-- I would reccomend University, not a book. There is much to learning a topic, including guidance from knowledgeable people. If you take raw knowledge and do not know how to apply it, you can learn things incorrectly and miss out on concepts you need to know-- Especially in complex systems.

    Sadly, it's not that simple that members here could say, "Here, read this book and it will all be clear."
    You need to read and study a Great Amount of books, get guidance, determine application of knowledge, more guidance, hit more books... Study periphreal subjects in order to have a solid foundation...

    I'm not a particle physicist either and much of my laymans knowledge has come from hundreds of books. And that alone meant little into I talked to actual physicists. That is why I'm a member on a science forum- to interact and help get my own misconceptions adressed (and occasionally make a fool of myself in the process

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    ).

    Unexpected things happen in science because that is how science works. To test and observe the results.
    Loopholes are not demonstrated. What is demonstrated is scientists experimenting and observing and working to increase the accuracy of their models.

    I think that's a great thing.

    I think the energies involved clearly show that this is not dangerous. If you have reason to think it is-- Please present it.
     
  10. Billy T Use Sugar Cane Alcohol car Fuel Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,198
    "... Scientists working on the European machine have smashed beams of protons together at energies that are 3.5 times higher than previously achieved. Tuesday's milestone {a few hours ago} marks the beginning of work that could lead to the discovery of fundamental new physics. There was cheering and applause in the LHC control room as the first collisions were confirmed. {Perhaps break thru to de Sitter space takes a few weeks to grow?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    }

    These seven-trillion-electronvolt (TeV) collisions have initiated 18-24 months of intensive investigations at the LHC. Scientists hope the studies will bring novel insights into the nature of the cosmos and how it came into being. But researchers caution that the data gathered from the sub-atomic impacts will take time to evaluate, and the public should not expect immediate results. {I hope they work fast so we will know if Higgs is real before the supernova hits us.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    }

    "Major discoveries will happen only when we are able to collect billions of events and identify among them the very rare events that could present a new state of matter or new particles," said Guido Tonelli, a spokesman for the CMS detector at the LHC. ..."

    From: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8593780.stm
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 30, 2010
  11. Paul W. Dixon Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    505
    SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT CERN AND FERMILAB
    We need to recall the Fermi Paradox in this connection. Given increased evidence for a plethora of planetary systems in our galaxy we must recall that there should be evidence for multiple ongoing civilizations unless they self-destruct with Type Ia Supernovae or other similar accidents. Lets prevent this from happernning to our civilization!

    Our hope is that the newest increment towards 14 Tev will not penetrate the
    potential barrier towards de Sitter space thus releasing the force of a Type Ia Supernova. All good wishes to one and all.

    As we force our way towards sudden doom we our certainly aware of these potential dangers!

    We may note in this connection the commonly used ego-defense mechanism of denial. It would seem obvious that we shouold not pursue a course of action which would lead to universal destruction. The ego-defence mechanism of denial is unconscious and therefore can operate in the presence of a real danger. Supernova generation from experimentation
    would lend itself readily to this mode of defense and be all the more hazardous for this reason.
    Sigmund Freud is justifiably famous for his medical discoveries such as the ego-defense mechanism of denial.

    "Towards the longest run in CERN’s history
    Following the decisions taken at the Chamonix meeting, the teams are preparing the LHC to run at collision energies of 7 TeV during the coming 18-24 months. The consolidation of the nQPS connectors has been successfully completed and the magnet powering at high current has begun." Our considered opinion is this increment in energetics at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN should be sufficient to form a transition towards de Sitter space thus confiriming the generalizations of the Generalized Theory of Albert Einstein by Willem de Sitter. May God have mercy on our souls.

    "All the new electrical connectors of the nQPS have been succesfully tested.
    Since the last issue of the Bulletin, all of the approximately 4000 high-voltage electrical connectors of the new Quench Protection System (nQPS) have been replaced in record time. Teams are now upgrading the software on some of the electronic circuit boards. This work is already complete in half the machine.

    At the same time, the Hardware Commissioning group has started to power up the magnets in all the sectors. This is a lengthy process that involves gradually increasing the current to reach the 6 kA needed to steer beams at an energy of 3.5 TeV/beam. Currently, all the sectors have passed the tests at low current, and Sectors 1-2 has been successfully tested at 5 kA.

    Over the coming days, the teams plan to power all the sectors to high current in order to make them ready for “machine check-out” – the process that prepares the machine for beam operation. According to the present schedule, beams should be circulating again in the LHC towards the end of February."

    "The LHC enters a new phase
    After achieving the world record energy of 1.18 TeV per proton beam last November, the LHC is now preparing for higher energy and luminosity." Please follow this on the LHC webpage as new developments are posted periodically as we plunge towards the unknown and our doom.

    "The teams are working in the tunnel to improve the electrical reliability of the magnet protection system.
    Before the 2009 running period began, all the necessary preparations to run the LHC at the collision energy of 1.18 TeV per beam had been carried out. The goal of the technical stop, which will end mid-February, is to prepare the machine for running at 3.5 TeV per beam. In order to achieve that, a current as high as 6 kAmps will have to flow into the LHC magnets.

    The main work is taking place on the new quench protection system (nQPS) where teams are improving the electrical reliability of the connection between the Instrumentation Feedthrough Systems (IFS) on the magnets and the nQPS equipment. There are around 500 of these connectors for each of the eight sectors in the LHC that need to be repaired. These operations are necessary to ensure that higher currents can be safely handled.

    The interventions on the nQPS follow a very strict procedure that ensures an extremely accurate quality control of the repairs: after repairing the electrical connections, specialized teams make a first visual control to check that everything is properly assembled; after that, the Electrical Quality Assurance (ELQA) team performs the high voltage tests; finally, the Hardware Commissioning teams power the magnets, initially with low current and finally at 6 kAmps.

    Several teams are taking advantage of the technical stop to carry on other technical verifications and efficiency tests, for instance on some vacuum pumping units, the kicker system, the Oxygen Deficiency Hazard detectors, some ventilation components and a few others.

    At present, all teams are on schedule: the powering tests have just started in Sectors 8-1 and 1-2; Sectors 2-3, 3-4 and 4-5 will follow shortly. According to the planning Sector 1-2 will be the first sector ready for beam operation by the end of January.

    At the same time as the LHC interventions, repairs are going on at CMS on the water cooling system. All work, both in the LHC and in the CMS experiment, is expected to be completed by mid-February."

    Einstein authored the Generalized Theory of Relativity which is very well respected and established in the field of physics circa 1920, and also the Standard Model of Quantum Field Physics begun in the 1970's. The Standard Model is incomplete since it does not encompass gravitational phenomena. Since it is the extension of the
    Generalized Theory of Relativity which predicts to de Sitter space this
    would be a reliable and established prediction based on modern
    relativistic cosmology. We need only wait for the confirmation of this
    prediction with the generation of a Type Ia Supernova from CERN. Billions of dollars are being spent in this pursuit of
    confirmation of the exisence of de Sitter space in the Einstein de Sitter
    Universe as it is now termed.

    Many thanks to everyone for your most kind actions in this tragic concern.
    (Please note: World Record for Luminosity, i.e., greatest energy yet seen
    on earth) Clearly, a scientific enterprise that deals wth energies found
    only fractions of a second after the point origin of the universe should
    proceed with caution and prudence or we shall all perish!

    Of further note in this connection, is additional evidence for the
    presence of de Sitter space in astronomical observations. Type Ia
    Supernovae are more energetic than other Supernovae by a factor of some 2.4. This is the case even though the progenitor object is of some 1 solar mass or less. These objects may then be below the Chandrasekar limit necessary for the
    implosion threshold necessary for the generation of Supernovae.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernova

    Other evidence for the intrusional events from de Sitter space may be
    noted in the monopolar jets from quasars. These objects are four to five
    times larger than bipolar objects. Where the fluxional energetics of these
    variables is measured in millions of galaxies, it would appear plausible
    to assume that there is a unique source of energetics for these larger
    objects (i.e. de Sitter space) since there is a dichotomous distinction
    between Class I and Class II objects. (Burns, J. O.(1990) Chasing the
    monster's tail: new views of cosmic jets. Astronomy, (18) 8, 28-37) Recent
    observations in suppot this postulation are found in, Discovery of a
    bright quasar without a massive host galaxy (Magain, P. Letawe, G.,
    Courbin, F., Jablonka, P., Jahnke, K., Meylan, G., Wisotzki, l., (2005)
    7057, 437, pp. 381-384). Thus indicating that the enormous fluxional
    energetics of millions of galaxies over thousands of light-years extending
    for billions of years may have origin in de Sitter space or other similar
    energetic domain.

    We have received approximately a month's reprieve thanks to the excellent judgement of the great people of Switzerland. Where quantum tunnelling may occur to an exploding universe so through this same potential barrier which permits quantum tunnelling a breach in the potential barrier towards de
    Sitter space will initiate a Supernova. There is only one Supernova per civilization and all is lost.
    Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
    by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)

    The energy intensity at CERN is now testing the hypothesis that we are now at the threshold of breaching the potential barrier towards de Sitter space. Much greater increments in energy are anticpated at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN.

    "On the evening of Tuesday, 8 December, two bunches per beam circulated for the first time at 1.18 TeV for a short period and ATLAS recorded its first collisions at the record energy of 2.36 TeV (centre of mass)."

    Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
    by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)

    One of the mathematical understandings in modern cosmology is that
    De Sitter space is topologically covariant with the continuum at every
    point. Thus sufficiant energy from the Large Hadron Collider can
    penetrate the potential barier towards de Sitter space releasing the force
    of a Supernova. We are most deeply indebted to you for your kind
    interest and understanding in this matter

    We note also: in the CERN news bulletin
    "For the first time also, lead ions have arrived at the doorstep of the
    LHC." ESSAY , The Collider, The Particle and a Theory about Fate
    (The New York Times, Dennis Overbye) It may be anticipated that we can
    reset the cosmic timetable for our planet and a host of nearby stars back to the
    interstellar medium.

    A notice from the LHC administration for your interest. Please take what what action you deem
    necessary in this connection. All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf.

    "The Latest from the LHC: Towards the big chill
    With 6 sectors out of 8 at nominal cryogenic temperature (1.9 K= about
    -271 C), the commissioning at the LHC is progressing well. According to
    the present schedule, the whole machine will be cold in about two weeks.

    Final operations to fill the nitrogen tanks for cooling the last sector to
    80K.
    Only Sectors 3-4 and 6-7 are still in the cooling phase (currently between
    60 and 20 K). As already mentioned in the previous update, as soon as a
    sector reaches the nominal cryogenic temperature, teams can start powering
    the magnets. At present, the current is flowing in the magnets of three
    sectors, while the remaining three will be powered in the coming two
    weeks."

    It may be intuitively more comprehensible to perceive the influx of energy as an electrical discharge since it would be the penetration of a potential barrier towards de Sitter space which releases the force of a Type Ia Supernova.

    As cited in the astrophysical literature, the energies resident in de Sitter space are vast enough to provide for the energies in a Type Ia Supernova.
    Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
    by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)

    It may be helpful to clarify the philosophical position and astrophysical
    energetics instrinsic to de Sitter space in the standard cosmological
    model in this postulation of transition from de Sitter space as generative
    of supernova in high-energy physics experimentation.

    A philosophical position may be cited from, G. W. F. Hegel (The philosophy
    of history, New York: Dover, 249, 1956) ..." there is no essential
    existence which does not manifest itself." The very large energies derived
    by Willem de Sitter for the equations describing the false vacuum of de
    Sitter space yield an energy density of 1.69 x 10^126 for eV (electron
    volts) per cm^3. (Gott, R. (1982) Creation of open universes from de
    Sitter space, Nature, 295, 304-307. In Waldrop. M.M., (1982) Bubbles upon
    the river of time, Science, 215, 4536, 1082-1083), the energy density of
    de Sitter space is given as: 5 x 10^31 kelvin and 3 x 10^93 grams per cm^3
    , converted to eV via e=mc^2 which is Albert Einstein's famous equation.
    This energy would then find expression in the observable universe. In the
    sense of this analysis, it would be quite unlikely that energies of this
    order of magnitude would remain hidden should a transition be formed in
    the potential barrier towards de Sitter space. This would serve as an
    immediate and ever present danger for the investigator and constitutes a
    public endangerment as well.

    This is based on the mainstream theory of universe formation by Professor
    R. Gott of Princeton University in which each bubble universe forms
    smoothly out of de Sitter space. A potentially infinite number of
    universes may form in de Sitter space. In a topological sense, de Sitter
    space is cobordant at each point with the continuum (our universe). De
    Sitter space is then prevented by a large potential barrier from forming
    an intrusional event into the continuum. The essential hypothesis of this
    formulation is that with sufficiently great energetics, a classical breach
    in the potential barrier towards de Siitter space will be formed thus
    releasing the force of Type Ia supernova upon the terrestrial ecosphere,
    the solar system and those nearby stars. These energies are from de Sitter
    space, therefore; the energies of the accelerator only serve as a trigger
    for their release.

    With sufficient energies, under this postulation, we discover that the
    accelerator is in the Einstein de Sitter universe, as it is now termed,
    and we have gone from particle physics as our governing theory to
    relativistic cosmology.

    Statistically speaking, Type Ia Supernovae are distinguished by having
    much greater luminosity at point of maximum light and they are of around
    1.40 solar masses or less and also show no presence of hydrogen at maximum
    light as well. Should this be caused via a transition towards de Sitter
    space then there should be no alteration of hydrogen towards calcium or
    other elements in deflagration of Supernova Type Ia. Other types of
    supernovae of I Types show presence of helium at time of maximum light.
    Should there be exemplars of greater mass levels for Type Ia supernovae
    this would again illustrate the artifical nature, e.g., high-energy
    physics experimentation generation of a transition towards de Sitter
    space. This indicates that CERN as an experimental configuration should generate a Type Ia Supernova thus supporting the work of Albert Einstein and the generalization of the Generalized Theory of Relativity
    by Willem de Sitter.

    http://www.google.com/search?pz=1&ne...tnmeta=searc
    h%3Dsearch=Search+the+Web

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_Ia_supernova

    http://www.space.com/scienceastronom..._atypical.html

    Please note there is now a limited time frame to bring this supernova generation to the attention of the director of CERN
    where the time of onset is now this November, 2009. May we offer our services to offer to present or debate the forthcoming destruction of our planet, our solar system and a host nearby stars via the generation of a Type Ia Supernova. Please contact at: dixon at hawaii.edu

    http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/

    Where there is no evidence of either helium or hydrogen at maximum light for Type Ia supernova this would further support the hypothesis of a transition towards de Sitter space. This is evidence of a statistical nature.

    http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1996PASJ...48...51S
    Title: Type-Ia Supernova SN 1995D in NGC 2962: Optical V, R, and I Band
    Photometry and Spectra, Sadakane, K., Yokoo, T., Arimoto, J.-I., Matsumoto, K., Honda, S., Tanabe, K., ,
    Journal: Publ. of the Astronomical Society of Japan, v.48, p.51-57.
    Bibliographic Code: 1996PASJ...48...51S

    It may be noted in this connection that there is no trace of hydrogen at maximum light for Supernovae Type Ia, which indicates that the companion star for this model is statistically unlikely since most stars are are of an hydrogen dominant order. This observation supports the the origin of these supernovae via a transtion towards de Sitter space or other highly energetic flux. Please note:

    The Golden Standard Type Ia Supernova 2005cf: Observations from the
    Ultraviolet to the Near-Infrared Wavebands
    Wang, X.; Li, W.; Filippenko, A. V.; Foley, R. J.; Kirshner, R. P.;
    Modjaz, M.; Bloom, J.; Brown, P. J.; Carter, D.; Friedman, A. S.; Gal-Yam,
    A.; Ganeshalingam, M.; Hicken, M.; Krisciunas, K.; Milne, P.; Silverman,
    J. M.; Suntzeff, N. B.; Wood-Vasey, W. M.; Cenko, S. B.; Challis, P.; Fox,
    D. B.; Kirkman, D.; Li, J. Z.; Li, T. P.; Malkan, M. A.; Moore, M. R.;
    Reitzel, D. B.; Rich, R. M.; Serduke, F. J. D.; Shang, R. C.; Steele, T.
    N.; Swift, B. J.; Tao, C.; Wong, D. S.; Zhang, S. N.

    For the generation of Type Ia supernova thermonuclear explosion explanations have been proposed, none of them have withstood modern testing.
    http://www.astrophysicsspectator.com...hermonuclear.h
    tml
    Thus the formation of a transnsition towards de Sitter space may be considereed as a viable alternative
    explanatory framework. Before we take the imprudent action of testing additional energies at CERN or yet again at the Fermi Nationional Acclerator Laboratory in Batavia, Illinois, more theoretical research should be employed to verify the safety of this research in highest-energy physics or all is lost.

    An educational presentation may be provided also:
    https://laulima.hawaii.edu/access/co...1010/Education
    Paul W. Dixon is responsible for this presentation, Copyright 2009 Paul W. Dixon.

    Consider the parameters for universe formation as being similar
    to that for Type Ia Supernova generation as being very small and
    vastly energetic. This may be philosophically difficult to comprehend
    yet essentially vital for survival!

    The parameter space of inflationary cosmology is seen in the estimate of chaotic expansion theory of the universe beginning at ~10^-43 seconds after the Big Bang, point origin of the Universe with total duration of expansion of 10^-35 seconds or thereabouts. Here the region of expansion no bigger than 10^-33 cm yielding with simultaneous inflations to reach the observable size of our Universe at l<~10^28 cm .. (Andrei Linde, Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology, La Tex Harwood, Chur, Switzerland, 1990, p39) Andrei Linde is the leading authority in this important work at the Department of Physics at Stanford University.
    http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-th/pdf/0503/0503203v1.pdf

    Should we consider the hypothesis of the uniformity of nature as predictive of the abundance of living forms with some of them attaining the capacity to
    transfer themselves to our location in the universe, what can account for their absence? We may note in this connection that there is only a short delay before a transition towards de Sitter space at CERN, Fermilab or other high-energy physics experimentation has generated a Type Ia Supernova as demonstrated in this thread. The frequency of Type Ia Supernova in the observable universe would then signal the termination of these technically advanced civilizations. A technical experimental mischance may then occur before the members of the respective civilizations are philosophically ready to accept this possibllity.

    The approach of the transition towards de Sitter space at Fermilab
    with the ongoing increase in luminoisty is seen:
    http://www.fnal.gov/pub/now/tevlum.html
    with these energies are now equivalent to those found at the point
    origin of the universe. i..e. "The Big Bang."

    We need to consider the increased evidence of water on Mars and the possibilty of water
    on other planetary bodies as the source of life as well as intelligent life thus supporting the hypothesis
    that other creatures much like ourselves can be a source of Type Ia Supernovae.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7919113.stm

    It is generally agreed that the the Large Hadron Collider will provide an
    empirical test for the formation of transition towards de Sitter space.
    The collisional energetcis are much greater that those tested in the
    Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Batavia Illinois.

    "The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is being built in a circular tunnel 27 km
    in circumference. The tunnel is buried around 50 to 175 m. underground. It
    straddles the Swiss and French borders on the outskirts of Geneva.

    The first beams were circulated successfully on 10th September 2008.
    ...fortunately on 19th September a serious fault developed damaging a
    number of superconducting magnets. The repair will require a long
    technical intervention which overlaps with the planned winter shutdown.
    The LHC beam will, therefore, not see beam again before September 2009.

    The LHC is designed to collide two counter rotating beams of protons or
    heavy ions. Proton-proton collisions are foreseen at an energy of 7 TeV
    per beam."

    The competing hypothesis which is considered even more objectionable than the transition towards de Sitter space is given in the False Vacuum solution to the Einstein de Sitter equations. Yet as can be seen in this formulation high-energy physics experimentation may serve as a trigger for this most untoward event.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_vacuum

    Please note in this regard that the transition towards de Sitter space is well-known in the cosmological literature. http://www.springerlink.com/content/p8377167602421t1/

    An affidavit regarding the contingency of a Type Ia Supernova has been submitted as part of the legal action to bring a moratorium against such an experimental mischance.
    http://dockets.justia.com/docket/cou...case_id-78717/
    Many thanks for the happy birthday wishes!!!

    With the additional energies available at the LHC in CERN, it may also be possible to test the competing hypothesis of forming a transition to the lower condition in the Einstein de Sitter Universe. Following the formation of this transition, our Universe would drain off into the lower energy condition. This should be of a lesser probabilty of occurence yet it is still considered as a possible outcome to this research.

    Please note: http://professordixon.blogspot.com

    The WORLD RECORD luminosity now employed at the accelerator (Please note:
    Accelerator Division Notification on the Fermilab Home Page) is 362.37 E30.
    In scientific notation, this 362.37 x 10 to the 30th power particle interactions. With a beam energy of 10 to the 11th power electron volts, we have then the energy of the current work at Fermilab set a 362.37 x 10 to the 41st power electron volts (362.37 E 41 eV). This is much greater than the largest energies seen on earth via cosmic ray interactions at 10 to the 19th power eV (E 19 eV). Without publicity regarding this most critical danger,
    a breach in the potential barrier may occur at any moment thus releasing
    the force of a supernova on our planet and solar system. We will thus have an intrusional event from de Sitter space in the Einstein de Sitter Universe
    as it is now termed. Your kind and generous action on behalf of all
    mankind is greatly needed at this critical juncture or all is lost and we
    shall all perish.

    Please note that the return flight of the Columbia shuttle was not halted because of the false belief that the the foam shards could not cause a life threatening defect in the aerodynamic properties of the shuttle.
    http://www.reuters.com/article/lates.../idUSN30568874

    As a fictional work, the novel Anathem remarks on scientists tinkering with what they do not understand. To quote from the journal Nature, "Anathem is a shrewd exploration of what might happen if the fear of scientists meddling with things they were never meant to know becomes entirely justified." with space-time itself included in the list of potential problem areas.
    (Jennifer Rahn, Imprisoned by intelligence, Neal Stephenson, Anathem, Opinion Nature, 456, 7221, 27 November 2008, 447-447)

    It may be noted in this connection that the term Anathem refers to an ecumenical curse of severe proportions. This may be understood to mean that we are expected to take extreme exception with predjudice to the work of those who would destroy us and our children through this meddling.

    Tycho Brahe's supernova, now identified as a Type Ia Supernova, shows those characteristics as predicted by the model expected in supernova from experimentation. A large Supernova has been generated leaving behind a type G star such as is found in our solar system. (Andrea Pastorello, Astrophysics, Echo from an ancient supernova, Nature 456, 7222, 4 December 2008, 587-589) The technique of light echoes was used for this identification of an historical object.

    As noted in Chang, J.,et al., An excess of cosmic ray electrons at energies of 300-800 GeV (Nature, 456, 7220, 20 November 2008, pp. 362-365) could be tapping into "muti-dimensional spaces with potenially important implications for our understanding of the Universe." Similarly, we may postulate that Type Ia supernovae are expressing the energetics of an n-dimensional space
    whose properties may be understood with further study.

    Please note that while the Type II Supernovae have origin in 10 or more solar mass objects Type Ia Supernovae have origin in objects of some 1 solar mass.
    It may be noted in this connection that the smaller massed Supernova give rise to deflagration of some 10 billion solar luminosities whilst the larger objects give rise to some 1 billion solar luminosity deflagration objects. This difference may lend support that the energetics of Type Ia Supernovae is created via an aperture formed towards de Sitter space. As also noted in this connection, there is no trace of hydrogen at maximum light for Type Ia Supernovae thus making it statistically unlikely that they have reached the Chandrssekhar limit by accretion from a nearby solar object.

    http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...ro/snovcn.html

    The formation of Type 1a Supernovae is dependent on them reaching the Chandrasekhar limit of greater than 1.4 solar mass to implode into a Supernova according to current theory.

    http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...ro/snovcn.html

    Yet there is evidence that the Type !a Supernova can form at one solar mass
    or less thus contradicting current theory and thus supporting the alternate theory where Type Ia Suoernovae may be formed via the formation of a transition towards de Sitter space.
    Probing Dark Energy with Supernovae
    by Sebastian Ihle
    9.6.2006

    As noted in our sciforums discussion, there are a number of competing hypotheses. An empirical investigation is under way at CERN in the LHC.
    Should we generate a Type Ia Supernova, this will confirm the existence of a
    highly energetic topologically cobordant continuum termed de Sitter space.
    So far, the astrophysical theoretical generalizations of the generalized theory of relativity have been confirmed at the 100% level. The world's largest experiment may yet create a tragic confirmatiion of Albert Einstein's theory.

    Please recall that the energies now proposed for the LHC at CERN will be some 7 times greater that those employed at FERMILAB. As is well-known, the energies in use at FERMILAB approximate those predicted for those found at the point origin of the Universe. Thus even from a Common Sense perspective we may penetrate the potential barrier towards de Sitter space
    thus releasing the force of Type Ia Supernova on our planet with the increaased energies to be employed at the LHC. Please note:

    Philosophy and Common Sense (Frances)

    "Not every philosophy professor takes philosophy seriously in the sense
    that she thinks that some purely philosophical theories that go against
    common sense have a good chance to be true. These philosophers respect
    anti-commonsensical theories, in that they admit such theories are very
    important in the pursuit of philosophical understanding. But they also
    think that there is no real chance that they are true. If you have a valid
    argument based not on scientific but purely philosophical reasoning, and
    that argument concludes with something against cross-cultural and timeless
    common sense, then at least one of the premises isnt true, or so they say.
    It might be tremendously difficult to identify the mistaken premise, but
    we can start our investigation off assuming that our assumption that the
    conclusion is false is safe. These philosophers take philosophising
    seriously, of course, but they dont take seriously the idea that purely
    philosophical (so not empirical, not mathematical) theories have a good
    chance at overthrowing parts of common sense."

    A videotaped presentation of this statement is under preparation. Link to this will be provided as soon as it is made ready. This should provide a more interesting source. We welcome any suggestions you may have in this connection for illustrative material. Please let us know what Malcolm Perry would indicate regarding the formation of a transition towards de Sitter space via highest-energy physics experimentation.

    Highest energy physics is an empirical science as noted below. We may then discover through experimentation the answer to our theoretical questions
    which are then derived from observation. Should the ongoing LHC at CERN produce the Higgs boson and field, this would then be a major victory for the Standatrard Model in Physics. Should we note the generation of a Type Ia Supernova, this will further confirm the current record of 100% successful predictions of the Generalized Theory of Relavity of Albert Einstein. These energies to be generated at CERN are those energy levels seen some 10^-9 - 10^-14 seconds subsequent to the point origin of the Universe. Experimentally we note that these energies are deemed sufficient for the testing of these hypotheses.

    Please access this webpage for a thorough update on the LHC at CERN.

    http://www.lhcdefense.org/

    Generation of Type Ia Supernova via a transition to de Sitter space may be added to this description as a consequence of highest energy physics experimentation.

    There has been a brief hiatus introduced from now until April or thereabouts for the reactivation of the LHC at CERN. We should consider all possible alternatives before this gravely irresponsible experiment begins anew.

    Please recall that the activation of the Large Hadron Collider at CERN is the onset of the largest highest-energy experiment so far extant on our planet.
    The empirical observation of a Type Ia Supernova will serve as another confirmation of the Generalized Theory of Albert Einstein. This theory, as noted below, has had 100% verifcation in other astrophysical observations.
    Let us not be so rash as to further test this theory and lose all that we hold most dear as a sacrifice to the ambitions of ruthless egoism and professional incompetence. We may discover the Higgs boson and field and yet create a perforation in the potential barrier towards de Sitter space and create a Supernova. The tentative date for the onset of the collisional actions at CERN is now around May 1, 2009.

    From the LHC Machine Outreach

    The LHC is designed to collide two counter rotating beams of protons or
    heavy ions. Proton-proton collisions are foreseen at an energy of 7 TeV
    per beam.

    The WORLD RECORD luminosity now employed per example at the US accelerator (Please note:
    Accelerator Division Notification on the Fermilab Home Page) is
    288.89E30.
    In scientific
    notation, this 288.89 x 10 to the 30th power particle interactions. With
    a beam energy of 10 to the 11th power electron volts, we have then the
    energy of the current work at Fermilab set a 288.89 x 10 to the 41st
    power
    electron volts (288.89 E 41 eV). This is much greater than the largest
    energies seen on earth via cosmic ray interactions at 10 to the 19th
    power eV (E 19 eV). Without publicity regarding this most critical danger,
    a breach in the potential barrier may occur at any moment thus releasing
    the force of a supernova on our planet and solar system. We will thus have an
    intrusional event from de Sitter space in the Einstein de Sitter Universe
    as it is now termed. Your kind and generous action on behalf of all
    mankind is greatly needed at this critical juncture or all is lost and we
    shall all perish as this undergoes a vast increment at CERN.

    As one of the seven plaintiffs in the District Court in Hawaii, may I offer a formal complaint agasinst Director of CERN Robert Aymar and to John Ellis chief theoretican of CERN to appear in the International Court in the Hague to answer charges of gross negligence in the operation of the Large Hadron Collider at CERN. As noted in this post, is the formal derivation of the generation of Type Ia Supernova from their experiment following the well-known work of Albert Einstein and his colleague Willem de Sitter in the generalized theory of relativity. The energies in nature do not approximate those found some 10^-9 to 10^-14 seconds subsequent to the Big Bang at the pont origin of the Universe without forming a transition towards de Sitter space as noted per exemplar in Type II supernovae and in quasars. Their willingness to proceed with this experiment with full knowledge of this potentiallity consititutes a criminal act of public endangerment. May we request that the good people of Switzerland discontinue power service to CERN until this matter has reached full legal disposition in the International Court in the Hague.

    May I add a personal note to this discussion. We should preserve the
    future for all mankind. Children have the right to grow-up in a safe and
    sheltered environment. We need to give our children the time to dream and
    grow into all future time. We should visit other planets, other stars, other
    galaxies to see and understand all things. Let us call for patience in
    this research endeavor until we are certain of the potential dangers that
    may lurk for the unsuspecting researcher. One Supernova will terminate all
    that we hold most dear.

    Update on the research progress at CERN.

    End of July: First particles may be injected, and the commissioning with
    beams and collisions will start.
    It is expected that it will take about 2 months to have first collisions
    at 10 TeV. Please note that only one area remains at below collisional
    energies.

    We shall now observe at CERN the onset of collisional energies at far
    greater impact than those observed at Fermilab.

    http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=...der-first-beam

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7512586.stm

    The Director General of CERN Robert Aymar as well as the safety officers
    of CERN have received the appended posting. We may hope that this message
    will alert them to the forthcoming generation of a Type Ia Supernova from
    the experimental highest-energy physics at CERN. So far, as the
    preparation for the LHC experiment continues, there has been no refutation
    of the theoretical work of Albert Einstein and the extension of his
    Generalized Theory of Relativity by Willem de Sitter. This forms the basis
    of our understanding of the Einstein de Sitter Universe as it is now
    termed. A review of the cosmological perspective is provided in the generation of Type Ia Supernova:
    http://professordixon.blogspot.com/


    Please note: Cool down at CERN is near completion as all segments are in
    the blue condition. Collisional energetics should now be observed shortly.
    May God have mercy on the souls of all our children.
    http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/

    As we are in engaged in an eschatological discourse, the "philosophy of
    last things," we need to distinguish between black hole generation as well
    as strangelets and Type Ia Supernova. Their generation and their effects
    are uncertain whilst Type Ia Supernova Generation is almost completely
    certain as are as any of the effects under the auspices of Albert
    Einstein's generalized theory of relativity. Please note: Dragging of
    Inertial Frames (Ignazio Ciufloni (2007) Nature 7158, 449, 41-53) Walter
    L. Wagner and I have discusssed this. Type Ia Supernova generation will be
    sudden and the destruction of our planet, our solar system and a host of
    nearby stars will follow. Should the CERN LHC (Large Hadron Collider) cool
    down schedule proceed as now planned, an empirical test of the hypothesis
    of Type Ia Supernova generation via highest energy physics experimentation
    will commence in June/July 2008. The 7 Tev phase of the research would
    then begin at this time. Please note: http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/
    cooldown progress in preparation of the empirical test of this hypotheisis
    at the LHC in CERN as noted above.

    Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
    by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)


    It may be helpful to clarify the philosophical position and astrophysical
    energetics instrinsic to de Sitter space in the standard cosmological
    model in this postulation of transition from de Sitter space as generative
    of supernova in high-energy physics experimentation.

    A philosophical position may be cited from, G. W. F. Hegel (The philosophy
    of history, New York: Dover, 249, 1956) ..." there is no essential
    existence which does not manifest itself." The very large energies derived
    by Willem de Sitter for the equations describing the false vacuum of de
    Sitter space yield an energy density of 1.69 x 10^126 for eV (electron
    volts) per cm^3. (Gott, R. (1982) Creation of open universes from de
    Sitter space, Nature, 295, 304-307. In Waldrop. M.M., (1982) Bubbles upon
    the river of time, Science, 215, 4536, 1082-1083), the energy density of
    de Sitter space is given as: 5 x 10^31 kelvin and 3 x 10^93 grams per cm^3
    , converted to eV via e=mc^2 which is Albert Einstein's famous equation.
    This energy would then find expression in the observable universe. In the
    sense of this analysis, it would be quite unlikely that energies of this
    order of magnitude would remain hidden should a transition be formed in
    the potential barrier towards de Sitter space. This would serve as an
    immediate and ever present danger for the investigator and constitutes a
    public endangerment as well.

    This is based on the mainstream theory of universe formation by Professor
    R. Gott of Princeton University in which each bubble universe forms
    smoothly out of de Sitter space. A potentially infinite number of
    universes may form in de Sitter space. In a topological sense, de Sitter
    space is cobordant at each point with the continuum (our universe). De
    Sitter space is then prevented by a large potential barrier from forming
    an intrusional event into the continuum. The essential hypothesis of this
    formulation is that with sufficiently great energetics, a classical breach
    in the potential barrier towards de Siitter space will be formed thus
    releasing the force of Type Ia supernova upon the terrestrial ecosphere,
    the solar system and those nearby stars. These energies are from de Sitter
    space, therefore; the energies of the accelerator only serve as a trigger
    for their release.

    With sufficient energies, under this postulation, we discover that the
    accelerator is in the Einstein de Sitter universe, as it is now termed,
    and we have gone from particle physics as our governing theory to
    relativistic cosmology.

    This supports of the theoretcal position that sufficient energy will penetrate the potential barrier towards de Sitter space thus releasing the force of an exploding Universe i.e., Supernova, on our planet. The works of Albert Einstein and Willem de Sitter as shown here have never been refuted.

    From the viewpoint of classical physics, the penetration towards de Sitter space is prevented by a large though not infinite potential barrier as described by Malcolm Perry. As the energies in the collliders go from 10^-9 seconds to 10^-14 seconds subsequent to the big bang at the point origin of the Universe, this penetrance becomes inevitable thus releasing the force of a Type Ia Supernova on our planet, solar system and host of nearby stars.

    All the children will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf.

    Yours sincerely,

    Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
    Supernova from Experimentation
     
    Last edited: Apr 14, 2010
  12. Paul W. Dixon Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    505
    SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT CERN AND FERMILAB

    A transition towards de Sitter space which is generative of a Type Ia Supernova is an easily detected signal. As a general principle, it may be stated that there is only one Supernova per civililization. We must then follow our research goals with caution and prudence.

    We need to recall the Fermi Paradox in this connection. Given increased evidence for a plethora of planetary systems in our galaxy we must recall that there should be evidence for multiple ongoing civilizations unless they self-destruct with Type Ia Supernovae or other similar accidents. Lets prevent this from happernning to our civilization!

    Our hope is that the newest increment towards 14 Tev will not penetrate the
    potential barrier towards de Sitter space thus releasing the force of a Type Ia Supernova. All good wishes to one and all.

    As we force our way towards sudden doom we our certainly aware of these potential dangers!

    We may note in this connection the commonly used ego-defense mechanism of denial. It would seem obvious that we shouold not pursue a course of action which would lead to universal destruction. The ego-defence mechanism of denial is unconscious and therefore can operate in the presence of a real danger. Supernova generation from experimentation
    would lend itself readily to this mode of defense and be all the more hazardous for this reason.
    Sigmund Freud is justifiably famous for his medical discoveries such as the ego-defense mechanism of denial.

    "Towards the longest run in CERN’s history
    Following the decisions taken at the Chamonix meeting, the teams are preparing the LHC to run at collision energies of 7 TeV during the coming 18-24 months. The consolidation of the nQPS connectors has been successfully completed and the magnet powering at high current has begun." Our considered opinion is this increment in energetics at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN should be sufficient to form a transition towards de Sitter space thus confiriming the generalizations of the Generalized Theory of Albert Einstein by Willem de Sitter. May God have mercy on our souls.

    "All the new electrical connectors of the nQPS have been succesfully tested.
    Since the last issue of the Bulletin, all of the approximately 4000 high-voltage electrical connectors of the new Quench Protection System (nQPS) have been replaced in record time. Teams are now upgrading the software on some of the electronic circuit boards. This work is already complete in half the machine.

    At the same time, the Hardware Commissioning group has started to power up the magnets in all the sectors. This is a lengthy process that involves gradually increasing the current to reach the 6 kA needed to steer beams at an energy of 3.5 TeV/beam. Currently, all the sectors have passed the tests at low current, and Sectors 1-2 has been successfully tested at 5 kA.

    Over the coming days, the teams plan to power all the sectors to high current in order to make them ready for “machine check-out” – the process that prepares the machine for beam operation. According to the present schedule, beams should be circulating again in the LHC towards the end of February."

    "The LHC enters a new phase
    After achieving the world record energy of 1.18 TeV per proton beam last November, the LHC is now preparing for higher energy and luminosity." Please follow this on the LHC webpage as new developments are posted periodically as we plunge towards the unknown and our doom.

    "The teams are working in the tunnel to improve the electrical reliability of the magnet protection system.
    Before the 2009 running period began, all the necessary preparations to run the LHC at the collision energy of 1.18 TeV per beam had been carried out. The goal of the technical stop, which will end mid-February, is to prepare the machine for running at 3.5 TeV per beam. In order to achieve that, a current as high as 6 kAmps will have to flow into the LHC magnets.

    The main work is taking place on the new quench protection system (nQPS) where teams are improving the electrical reliability of the connection between the Instrumentation Feedthrough Systems (IFS) on the magnets and the nQPS equipment. There are around 500 of these connectors for each of the eight sectors in the LHC that need to be repaired. These operations are necessary to ensure that higher currents can be safely handled.

    The interventions on the nQPS follow a very strict procedure that ensures an extremely accurate quality control of the repairs: after repairing the electrical connections, specialized teams make a first visual control to check that everything is properly assembled; after that, the Electrical Quality Assurance (ELQA) team performs the high voltage tests; finally, the Hardware Commissioning teams power the magnets, initially with low current and finally at 6 kAmps.

    Several teams are taking advantage of the technical stop to carry on other technical verifications and efficiency tests, for instance on some vacuum pumping units, the kicker system, the Oxygen Deficiency Hazard detectors, some ventilation components and a few others.

    At present, all teams are on schedule: the powering tests have just started in Sectors 8-1 and 1-2; Sectors 2-3, 3-4 and 4-5 will follow shortly. According to the planning Sector 1-2 will be the first sector ready for beam operation by the end of January.

    At the same time as the LHC interventions, repairs are going on at CMS on the water cooling system. All work, both in the LHC and in the CMS experiment, is expected to be completed by mid-February."

    Einstein authored the Generalized Theory of Relativity which is very well respected and established in the field of physics circa 1920, and also the Standard Model of Quantum Field Physics begun in the 1970's. The Standard Model is incomplete since it does not encompass gravitational phenomena. Since it is the extension of the
    Generalized Theory of Relativity which predicts to de Sitter space this
    would be a reliable and established prediction based on modern
    relativistic cosmology. We need only wait for the confirmation of this
    prediction with the generation of a Type Ia Supernova from CERN. Billions of dollars are being spent in this pursuit of
    confirmation of the exisence of de Sitter space in the Einstein de Sitter
    Universe as it is now termed.

    Many thanks to everyone for your most kind actions in this tragic concern.
    (Please note: World Record for Luminosity, i.e., greatest energy yet seen
    on earth) Clearly, a scientific enterprise that deals wth energies found
    only fractions of a second after the point origin of the universe should
    proceed with caution and prudence or we shall all perish!

    Of further note in this connection, is additional evidence for the
    presence of de Sitter space in astronomical observations. Type Ia
    Supernovae are more energetic than other Supernovae by a factor of some 2.4. This is the case even though the progenitor object is of some 1 solar mass or less. These objects may then be below the Chandrasekar limit necessary for the
    implosion threshold necessary for the generation of Supernovae.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernova

    Other evidence for the intrusional events from de Sitter space may be
    noted in the monopolar jets from quasars. These objects are four to five
    times larger than bipolar objects. Where the fluxional energetics of these
    variables is measured in millions of galaxies, it would appear plausible
    to assume that there is a unique source of energetics for these larger
    objects (i.e. de Sitter space) since there is a dichotomous distinction
    between Class I and Class II objects. (Burns, J. O.(1990) Chasing the
    monster's tail: new views of cosmic jets. Astronomy, (18) 8, 28-37) Recent
    observations in suppot this postulation are found in, Discovery of a
    bright quasar without a massive host galaxy (Magain, P. Letawe, G.,
    Courbin, F., Jablonka, P., Jahnke, K., Meylan, G., Wisotzki, l., (2005)
    7057, 437, pp. 381-384). Thus indicating that the enormous fluxional
    energetics of millions of galaxies over thousands of light-years extending
    for billions of years may have origin in de Sitter space or other similar
    energetic domain.

    We have received approximately a month's reprieve thanks to the excellent judgement of the great people of Switzerland. Where quantum tunnelling may occur to an exploding universe so through this same potential barrier which permits quantum tunnelling a breach in the potential barrier towards de
    Sitter space will initiate a Supernova. There is only one Supernova per civilization and all is lost.
    Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
    by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)

    The energy intensity at CERN is now testing the hypothesis that we are now at the threshold of breaching the potential barrier towards de Sitter space. Much greater increments in energy are anticpated at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN.

    "On the evening of Tuesday, 8 December, two bunches per beam circulated for the first time at 1.18 TeV for a short period and ATLAS recorded its first collisions at the record energy of 2.36 TeV (centre of mass)."

    Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
    by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)

    One of the mathematical understandings in modern cosmology is that
    De Sitter space is topologically covariant with the continuum at every
    point. Thus sufficiant energy from the Large Hadron Collider can
    penetrate the potential barier towards de Sitter space releasing the force
    of a Supernova. We are most deeply indebted to you for your kind
    interest and understanding in this matter

    We note also: in the CERN news bulletin
    "For the first time also, lead ions have arrived at the doorstep of the
    LHC." ESSAY , The Collider, The Particle and a Theory about Fate
    (The New York Times, Dennis Overbye) It may be anticipated that we can
    reset the cosmic timetable for our planet and a host of nearby stars back to the
    interstellar medium.

    A notice from the LHC administration for your interest. Please take what what action you deem
    necessary in this connection. All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf.

    "The Latest from the LHC: Towards the big chill
    With 6 sectors out of 8 at nominal cryogenic temperature (1.9 K= about
    -271 C), the commissioning at the LHC is progressing well. According to
    the present schedule, the whole machine will be cold in about two weeks.

    Final operations to fill the nitrogen tanks for cooling the last sector to
    80K.
    Only Sectors 3-4 and 6-7 are still in the cooling phase (currently between
    60 and 20 K). As already mentioned in the previous update, as soon as a
    sector reaches the nominal cryogenic temperature, teams can start powering
    the magnets. At present, the current is flowing in the magnets of three
    sectors, while the remaining three will be powered in the coming two
    weeks."

    It may be intuitively more comprehensible to perceive the influx of energy as an electrical discharge since it would be the penetration of a potential barrier towards de Sitter space which releases the force of a Type Ia Supernova.

    As cited in the astrophysical literature, the energies resident in de Sitter space are vast enough to provide for the energies in a Type Ia Supernova.
    Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
    by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)

    It may be helpful to clarify the philosophical position and astrophysical
    energetics instrinsic to de Sitter space in the standard cosmological
    model in this postulation of transition from de Sitter space as generative
    of supernova in high-energy physics experimentation.

    A philosophical position may be cited from, G. W. F. Hegel (The philosophy
    of history, New York: Dover, 249, 1956) ..." there is no essential
    existence which does not manifest itself." The very large energies derived
    by Willem de Sitter for the equations describing the false vacuum of de
    Sitter space yield an energy density of 1.69 x 10^126 for eV (electron
    volts) per cm^3. (Gott, R. (1982) Creation of open universes from de
    Sitter space, Nature, 295, 304-307. In Waldrop. M.M., (1982) Bubbles upon
    the river of time, Science, 215, 4536, 1082-1083), the energy density of
    de Sitter space is given as: 5 x 10^31 kelvin and 3 x 10^93 grams per cm^3
    , converted to eV via e=mc^2 which is Albert Einstein's famous equation.
    This energy would then find expression in the observable universe. In the
    sense of this analysis, it would be quite unlikely that energies of this
    order of magnitude would remain hidden should a transition be formed in
    the potential barrier towards de Sitter space. This would serve as an
    immediate and ever present danger for the investigator and constitutes a
    public endangerment as well.

    This is based on the mainstream theory of universe formation by Professor
    R. Gott of Princeton University in which each bubble universe forms
    smoothly out of de Sitter space. A potentially infinite number of
    universes may form in de Sitter space. In a topological sense, de Sitter
    space is cobordant at each point with the continuum (our universe). De
    Sitter space is then prevented by a large potential barrier from forming
    an intrusional event into the continuum. The essential hypothesis of this
    formulation is that with sufficiently great energetics, a classical breach
    in the potential barrier towards de Siitter space will be formed thus
    releasing the force of Type Ia supernova upon the terrestrial ecosphere,
    the solar system and those nearby stars. These energies are from de Sitter
    space, therefore; the energies of the accelerator only serve as a trigger
    for their release.

    With sufficient energies, under this postulation, we discover that the
    accelerator is in the Einstein de Sitter universe, as it is now termed,
    and we have gone from particle physics as our governing theory to
    relativistic cosmology.

    Statistically speaking, Type Ia Supernovae are distinguished by having
    much greater luminosity at point of maximum light and they are of around
    1.40 solar masses or less and also show no presence of hydrogen at maximum
    light as well. Should this be caused via a transition towards de Sitter
    space then there should be no alteration of hydrogen towards calcium or
    other elements in deflagration of Supernova Type Ia. Other types of
    supernovae of I Types show presence of helium at time of maximum light.
    Should there be exemplars of greater mass levels for Type Ia supernovae
    this would again illustrate the artifical nature, e.g., high-energy
    physics experimentation generation of a transition towards de Sitter
    space. This indicates that CERN as an experimental configuration should generate a Type Ia Supernova thus supporting the work of Albert Einstein and the generalization of the Generalized Theory of Relativity
    by Willem de Sitter.

    http://www.google.com/search?pz=1&ne...tnmeta=searc
    h%3Dsearch=Search+the+Web

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_Ia_supernova

    http://www.space.com/scienceastronom..._atypical.html

    Please note there is now a limited time frame to bring this supernova generation to the attention of the director of CERN
    where the time of onset is now this November, 2009. May we offer our services to offer to present or debate the forthcoming destruction of our planet, our solar system and a host nearby stars via the generation of a Type Ia Supernova. Please contact at: dixon at hawaii.edu

    http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/

    Where there is no evidence of either helium or hydrogen at maximum light for Type Ia supernova this would further support the hypothesis of a transition towards de Sitter space. This is evidence of a statistical nature.

    http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1996PASJ...48...51S
    Title: Type-Ia Supernova SN 1995D in NGC 2962: Optical V, R, and I Band
    Photometry and Spectra, Sadakane, K., Yokoo, T., Arimoto, J.-I., Matsumoto, K., Honda, S., Tanabe, K., ,
    Journal: Publ. of the Astronomical Society of Japan, v.48, p.51-57.
    Bibliographic Code: 1996PASJ...48...51S

    It may be noted in this connection that there is no trace of hydrogen at maximum light for Supernovae Type Ia, which indicates that the companion star for this model is statistically unlikely since most stars are are of an hydrogen dominant order. This observation supports the the origin of these supernovae via a transtion towards de Sitter space or other highly energetic flux. Please note:

    The Golden Standard Type Ia Supernova 2005cf: Observations from the
    Ultraviolet to the Near-Infrared Wavebands
    Wang, X.; Li, W.; Filippenko, A. V.; Foley, R. J.; Kirshner, R. P.;
    Modjaz, M.; Bloom, J.; Brown, P. J.; Carter, D.; Friedman, A. S.; Gal-Yam,
    A.; Ganeshalingam, M.; Hicken, M.; Krisciunas, K.; Milne, P.; Silverman,
    J. M.; Suntzeff, N. B.; Wood-Vasey, W. M.; Cenko, S. B.; Challis, P.; Fox,
    D. B.; Kirkman, D.; Li, J. Z.; Li, T. P.; Malkan, M. A.; Moore, M. R.;
    Reitzel, D. B.; Rich, R. M.; Serduke, F. J. D.; Shang, R. C.; Steele, T.
    N.; Swift, B. J.; Tao, C.; Wong, D. S.; Zhang, S. N.

    For the generation of Type Ia supernova thermonuclear explosion explanations have been proposed, none of them have withstood modern testing.
    http://www.astrophysicsspectator.com...hermonuclear.h
    tml
    Thus the formation of a transnsition towards de Sitter space may be considereed as a viable alternative
    explanatory framework. Before we take the imprudent action of testing additional energies at CERN or yet again at the Fermi Nationional Acclerator Laboratory in Batavia, Illinois, more theoretical research should be employed to verify the safety of this research in highest-energy physics or all is lost.

    An educational presentation may be provided also:
    https://laulima.hawaii.edu/access/co...1010/Education
    Paul W. Dixon is responsible for this presentation, Copyright 2009 Paul W. Dixon.

    Consider the parameters for universe formation as being similar
    to that for Type Ia Supernova generation as being very small and
    vastly energetic. This may be philosophically difficult to comprehend
    yet essentially vital for survival!

    The parameter space of inflationary cosmology is seen in the estimate of chaotic expansion theory of the universe beginning at ~10^-43 seconds after the Big Bang, point origin of the Universe with total duration of expansion of 10^-35 seconds or thereabouts. Here the region of expansion no bigger than 10^-33 cm yielding with simultaneous inflations to reach the observable size of our Universe at l<~10^28 cm .. (Andrei Linde, Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology, La Tex Harwood, Chur, Switzerland, 1990, p39) Andrei Linde is the leading authority in this important work at the Department of Physics at Stanford University.
    http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-th/pdf/0503/0503203v1.pdf

    Should we consider the hypothesis of the uniformity of nature as predictive of the abundance of living forms with some of them attaining the capacity to
    transfer themselves to our location in the universe, what can account for their absence? We may note in this connection that there is only a short delay before a transition towards de Sitter space at CERN, Fermilab or other high-energy physics experimentation has generated a Type Ia Supernova as demonstrated in this thread. The frequency of Type Ia Supernova in the observable universe would then signal the termination of these technically advanced civilizations. A technical experimental mischance may then occur before the members of the respective civilizations are philosophically ready to accept this possibllity.

    The approach of the transition towards de Sitter space at Fermilab
    with the ongoing increase in luminoisty is seen:
    http://www.fnal.gov/pub/now/tevlum.html
    with these energies are now equivalent to those found at the point
    origin of the universe. i..e. "The Big Bang."

    We need to consider the increased evidence of water on Mars and the possibilty of water
    on other planetary bodies as the source of life as well as intelligent life thus supporting the hypothesis
    that other creatures much like ourselves can be a source of Type Ia Supernovae.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7919113.stm

    It is generally agreed that the the Large Hadron Collider will provide an
    empirical test for the formation of transition towards de Sitter space.
    The collisional energetcis are much greater that those tested in the
    Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Batavia Illinois.

    "The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is being built in a circular tunnel 27 km
    in circumference. The tunnel is buried around 50 to 175 m. underground. It
    straddles the Swiss and French borders on the outskirts of Geneva.

    The first beams were circulated successfully on 10th September 2008.
    ...fortunately on 19th September a serious fault developed damaging a
    number of superconducting magnets. The repair will require a long
    technical intervention which overlaps with the planned winter shutdown.
    The LHC beam will, therefore, not see beam again before September 2009.

    The LHC is designed to collide two counter rotating beams of protons or
    heavy ions. Proton-proton collisions are foreseen at an energy of 7 TeV
    per beam."

    The competing hypothesis which is considered even more objectionable than the transition towards de Sitter space is given in the False Vacuum solution to the Einstein de Sitter equations. Yet as can be seen in this formulation high-energy physics experimentation may serve as a trigger for this most untoward event.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_vacuum

    Please note in this regard that the transition towards de Sitter space is well-known in the cosmological literature. http://www.springerlink.com/content/p8377167602421t1/

    An affidavit regarding the contingency of a Type Ia Supernova has been submitted as part of the legal action to bring a moratorium against such an experimental mischance.
    http://dockets.justia.com/docket/cou...case_id-78717/
    Many thanks for the happy birthday wishes!!!

    With the additional energies available at the LHC in CERN, it may also be possible to test the competing hypothesis of forming a transition to the lower condition in the Einstein de Sitter Universe. Following the formation of this transition, our Universe would drain off into the lower energy condition. This should be of a lesser probabilty of occurence yet it is still considered as a possible outcome to this research.

    Please note: http://professordixon.blogspot.com

    The WORLD RECORD luminosity now employed at the accelerator (Please note:
    Accelerator Division Notification on the Fermilab Home Page) is 362.37 E30.
    In scientific notation, this 362.37 x 10 to the 30th power particle interactions. With a beam energy of 10 to the 11th power electron volts, we have then the energy of the current work at Fermilab set a 362.37 x 10 to the 41st power electron volts (362.37 E 41 eV). This is much greater than the largest energies seen on earth via cosmic ray interactions at 10 to the 19th power eV (E 19 eV). Without publicity regarding this most critical danger,
    a breach in the potential barrier may occur at any moment thus releasing
    the force of a supernova on our planet and solar system. We will thus have an intrusional event from de Sitter space in the Einstein de Sitter Universe
    as it is now termed. Your kind and generous action on behalf of all
    mankind is greatly needed at this critical juncture or all is lost and we
    shall all perish.

    Please note that the return flight of the Columbia shuttle was not halted because of the false belief that the the foam shards could not cause a life threatening defect in the aerodynamic properties of the shuttle.
    http://www.reuters.com/article/lates.../idUSN30568874

    As a fictional work, the novel Anathem remarks on scientists tinkering with what they do not understand. To quote from the journal Nature, "Anathem is a shrewd exploration of what might happen if the fear of scientists meddling with things they were never meant to know becomes entirely justified." with space-time itself included in the list of potential problem areas.
    (Jennifer Rahn, Imprisoned by intelligence, Neal Stephenson, Anathem, Opinion Nature, 456, 7221, 27 November 2008, 447-447)

    It may be noted in this connection that the term Anathem refers to an ecumenical curse of severe proportions. This may be understood to mean that we are expected to take extreme exception with predjudice to the work of those who would destroy us and our children through this meddling.

    Tycho Brahe's supernova, now identified as a Type Ia Supernova, shows those characteristics as predicted by the model expected in supernova from experimentation. A large Supernova has been generated leaving behind a type G star such as is found in our solar system. (Andrea Pastorello, Astrophysics, Echo from an ancient supernova, Nature 456, 7222, 4 December 2008, 587-589) The technique of light echoes was used for this identification of an historical object.

    As noted in Chang, J.,et al., An excess of cosmic ray electrons at energies of 300-800 GeV (Nature, 456, 7220, 20 November 2008, pp. 362-365) could be tapping into "muti-dimensional spaces with potenially important implications for our understanding of the Universe." Similarly, we may postulate that Type Ia supernovae are expressing the energetics of an n-dimensional space
    whose properties may be understood with further study.

    Please note that while the Type II Supernovae have origin in 10 or more solar mass objects Type Ia Supernovae have origin in objects of some 1 solar mass.
    It may be noted in this connection that the smaller massed Supernova give rise to deflagration of some 10 billion solar luminosities whilst the larger objects give rise to some 1 billion solar luminosity deflagration objects. This difference may lend support that the energetics of Type Ia Supernovae is created via an aperture formed towards de Sitter space. As also noted in this connection, there is no trace of hydrogen at maximum light for Type Ia Supernovae thus making it statistically unlikely that they have reached the Chandrssekhar limit by accretion from a nearby solar object.

    http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...ro/snovcn.html

    The formation of Type 1a Supernovae is dependent on them reaching the Chandrasekhar limit of greater than 1.4 solar mass to implode into a Supernova according to current theory.

    http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...ro/snovcn.html

    Yet there is evidence that the Type !a Supernova can form at one solar mass
    or less thus contradicting current theory and thus supporting the alternate theory where Type Ia Suoernovae may be formed via the formation of a transition towards de Sitter space.
    Probing Dark Energy with Supernovae
    by Sebastian Ihle
    9.6.2006

    As noted in our sciforums discussion, there are a number of competing hypotheses. An empirical investigation is under way at CERN in the LHC.
    Should we generate a Type Ia Supernova, this will confirm the existence of a
    highly energetic topologically cobordant continuum termed de Sitter space.
    So far, the astrophysical theoretical generalizations of the generalized theory of relativity have been confirmed at the 100% level. The world's largest experiment may yet create a tragic confirmatiion of Albert Einstein's theory.

    Please recall that the energies now proposed for the LHC at CERN will be some 7 times greater that those employed at FERMILAB. As is well-known, the energies in use at FERMILAB approximate those predicted for those found at the point origin of the Universe. Thus even from a Common Sense perspective we may penetrate the potential barrier towards de Sitter space
    thus releasing the force of Type Ia Supernova on our planet with the increaased energies to be employed at the LHC. Please note:

    Philosophy and Common Sense (Frances)

    "Not every philosophy professor takes philosophy seriously in the sense
    that she thinks that some purely philosophical theories that go against
    common sense have a good chance to be true. These philosophers respect
    anti-commonsensical theories, in that they admit such theories are very
    important in the pursuit of philosophical understanding. But they also
    think that there is no real chance that they are true. If you have a valid
    argument based not on scientific but purely philosophical reasoning, and
    that argument concludes with something against cross-cultural and timeless
    common sense, then at least one of the premises isnt true, or so they say.
    It might be tremendously difficult to identify the mistaken premise, but
    we can start our investigation off assuming that our assumption that the
    conclusion is false is safe. These philosophers take philosophising
    seriously, of course, but they dont take seriously the idea that purely
    philosophical (so not empirical, not mathematical) theories have a good
    chance at overthrowing parts of common sense."

    A videotaped presentation of this statement is under preparation. Link to this will be provided as soon as it is made ready. This should provide a more interesting source. We welcome any suggestions you may have in this connection for illustrative material. Please let us know what Malcolm Perry would indicate regarding the formation of a transition towards de Sitter space via highest-energy physics experimentation.

    Highest energy physics is an empirical science as noted below. We may then discover through experimentation the answer to our theoretical questions
    which are then derived from observation. Should the ongoing LHC at CERN produce the Higgs boson and field, this would then be a major victory for the Standatrard Model in Physics. Should we note the generation of a Type Ia Supernova, this will further confirm the current record of 100% successful predictions of the Generalized Theory of Relavity of Albert Einstein. These energies to be generated at CERN are those energy levels seen some 10^-9 - 10^-14 seconds subsequent to the point origin of the Universe. Experimentally we note that these energies are deemed sufficient for the testing of these hypotheses.

    Please access this webpage for a thorough update on the LHC at CERN.

    http://www.lhcdefense.org/

    Generation of Type Ia Supernova via a transition to de Sitter space may be added to this description as a consequence of highest energy physics experimentation.

    There has been a brief hiatus introduced from now until April or thereabouts for the reactivation of the LHC at CERN. We should consider all possible alternatives before this gravely irresponsible experiment begins anew.

    Please recall that the activation of the Large Hadron Collider at CERN is the onset of the largest highest-energy experiment so far extant on our planet.
    The empirical observation of a Type Ia Supernova will serve as another confirmation of the Generalized Theory of Albert Einstein. This theory, as noted below, has had 100% verifcation in other astrophysical observations.
    Let us not be so rash as to further test this theory and lose all that we hold most dear as a sacrifice to the ambitions of ruthless egoism and professional incompetence. We may discover the Higgs boson and field and yet create a perforation in the potential barrier towards de Sitter space and create a Supernova. The tentative date for the onset of the collisional actions at CERN is now around May 1, 2009.

    From the LHC Machine Outreach

    The LHC is designed to collide two counter rotating beams of protons or
    heavy ions. Proton-proton collisions are foreseen at an energy of 7 TeV
    per beam.

    The WORLD RECORD luminosity now employed per example at the US accelerator (Please note:
    Accelerator Division Notification on the Fermilab Home Page) is
    288.89E30.
    In scientific
    notation, this 288.89 x 10 to the 30th power particle interactions. With
    a beam energy of 10 to the 11th power electron volts, we have then the
    energy of the current work at Fermilab set a 288.89 x 10 to the 41st
    power
    electron volts (288.89 E 41 eV). This is much greater than the largest
    energies seen on earth via cosmic ray interactions at 10 to the 19th
    power eV (E 19 eV). Without publicity regarding this most critical danger,
    a breach in the potential barrier may occur at any moment thus releasing
    the force of a supernova on our planet and solar system. We will thus have an
    intrusional event from de Sitter space in the Einstein de Sitter Universe
    as it is now termed. Your kind and generous action on behalf of all
    mankind is greatly needed at this critical juncture or all is lost and we
    shall all perish as this undergoes a vast increment at CERN.

    As one of the seven plaintiffs in the District Court in Hawaii, may I offer a formal complaint agasinst Director of CERN Robert Aymar and to John Ellis chief theoretican of CERN to appear in the International Court in the Hague to answer charges of gross negligence in the operation of the Large Hadron Collider at CERN. As noted in this post, is the formal derivation of the generation of Type Ia Supernova from their experiment following the well-known work of Albert Einstein and his colleague Willem de Sitter in the generalized theory of relativity. The energies in nature do not approximate those found some 10^-9 to 10^-14 seconds subsequent to the Big Bang at the pont origin of the Universe without forming a transition towards de Sitter space as noted per exemplar in Type II supernovae and in quasars. Their willingness to proceed with this experiment with full knowledge of this potentiallity consititutes a criminal act of public endangerment. May we request that the good people of Switzerland discontinue power service to CERN until this matter has reached full legal disposition in the International Court in the Hague.

    May I add a personal note to this discussion. We should preserve the
    future for all mankind. Children have the right to grow-up in a safe and
    sheltered environment. We need to give our children the time to dream and
    grow into all future time. We should visit other planets, other stars, other
    galaxies to see and understand all things. Let us call for patience in
    this research endeavor until we are certain of the potential dangers that
    may lurk for the unsuspecting researcher. One Supernova will terminate all
    that we hold most dear.

    Update on the research progress at CERN.

    End of July: First particles may be injected, and the commissioning with
    beams and collisions will start.
    It is expected that it will take about 2 months to have first collisions
    at 10 TeV. Please note that only one area remains at below collisional
    energies.

    We shall now observe at CERN the onset of collisional energies at far
    greater impact than those observed at Fermilab.

    http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=...der-first-beam

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7512586.stm

    The Director General of CERN Robert Aymar as well as the safety officers
    of CERN have received the appended posting. We may hope that this message
    will alert them to the forthcoming generation of a Type Ia Supernova from
    the experimental highest-energy physics at CERN. So far, as the
    preparation for the LHC experiment continues, there has been no refutation
    of the theoretical work of Albert Einstein and the extension of his
    Generalized Theory of Relativity by Willem de Sitter. This forms the basis
    of our understanding of the Einstein de Sitter Universe as it is now
    termed. A review of the cosmological perspective is provided in the generation of Type Ia Supernova:
    http://professordixon.blogspot.com/


    Please note: Cool down at CERN is near completion as all segments are in
    the blue condition. Collisional energetics should now be observed shortly.
    May God have mercy on the souls of all our children.
    http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/

    As we are in engaged in an eschatological discourse, the "philosophy of
    last things," we need to distinguish between black hole generation as well
    as strangelets and Type Ia Supernova. Their generation and their effects
    are uncertain whilst Type Ia Supernova Generation is almost completely
    certain as are as any of the effects under the auspices of Albert
    Einstein's generalized theory of relativity. Please note: Dragging of
    Inertial Frames (Ignazio Ciufloni (2007) Nature 7158, 449, 41-53) Walter
    L. Wagner and I have discusssed this. Type Ia Supernova generation will be
    sudden and the destruction of our planet, our solar system and a host of
    nearby stars will follow. Should the CERN LHC (Large Hadron Collider) cool
    down schedule proceed as now planned, an empirical test of the hypothesis
    of Type Ia Supernova generation via highest energy physics experimentation
    will commence in June/July 2008. The 7 Tev phase of the research would
    then begin at this time. Please note: http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/
    cooldown progress in preparation of the empirical test of this hypotheisis
    at the LHC in CERN as noted above.

    Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
    by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)


    It may be helpful to clarify the philosophical position and astrophysical
    energetics instrinsic to de Sitter space in the standard cosmological
    model in this postulation of transition from de Sitter space as generative
    of supernova in high-energy physics experimentation.

    A philosophical position may be cited from, G. W. F. Hegel (The philosophy
    of history, New York: Dover, 249, 1956) ..." there is no essential
    existence which does not manifest itself." The very large energies derived
    by Willem de Sitter for the equations describing the false vacuum of de
    Sitter space yield an energy density of 1.69 x 10^126 for eV (electron
    volts) per cm^3. (Gott, R. (1982) Creation of open universes from de
    Sitter space, Nature, 295, 304-307. In Waldrop. M.M., (1982) Bubbles upon
    the river of time, Science, 215, 4536, 1082-1083), the energy density of
    de Sitter space is given as: 5 x 10^31 kelvin and 3 x 10^93 grams per cm^3
    , converted to eV via e=mc^2 which is Albert Einstein's famous equation.
    This energy would then find expression in the observable universe. In the
    sense of this analysis, it would be quite unlikely that energies of this
    order of magnitude would remain hidden should a transition be formed in
    the potential barrier towards de Sitter space. This would serve as an
    immediate and ever present danger for the investigator and constitutes a
    public endangerment as well.

    This is based on the mainstream theory of universe formation by Professor
    R. Gott of Princeton University in which each bubble universe forms
    smoothly out of de Sitter space. A potentially infinite number of
    universes may form in de Sitter space. In a topological sense, de Sitter
    space is cobordant at each point with the continuum (our universe). De
    Sitter space is then prevented by a large potential barrier from forming
    an intrusional event into the continuum. The essential hypothesis of this
    formulation is that with sufficiently great energetics, a classical breach
    in the potential barrier towards de Siitter space will be formed thus
    releasing the force of Type Ia supernova upon the terrestrial ecosphere,
    the solar system and those nearby stars. These energies are from de Sitter
    space, therefore; the energies of the accelerator only serve as a trigger
    for their release.

    With sufficient energies, under this postulation, we discover that the
    accelerator is in the Einstein de Sitter universe, as it is now termed,
    and we have gone from particle physics as our governing theory to
    relativistic cosmology.

    This supports of the theoretcal position that sufficient energy will penetrate the potential barrier towards de Sitter space thus releasing the force of an exploding Universe i.e., Supernova, on our planet. The works of Albert Einstein and Willem de Sitter as shown here have never been refuted.

    From the viewpoint of classical physics, the penetration towards de Sitter space is prevented by a large though not infinite potential barrier as described by Malcolm Perry. As the energies in the collliders go from 10^-9 seconds to 10^-14 seconds subsequent to the big bang at the point origin of the Universe, this penetrance becomes inevitable thus releasing the force of a Type Ia Supernova on our planet, solar system and host of nearby stars.

    All the children will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf.

    Yours sincerely,

    Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
    Supernova from Experimentation
     
  13. BWE1 Rulers are for measuring. Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    304
    That is a long post for page 95. just sayin.
     
  14. Paul W. Dixon Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    505
    SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT CERN AND FERMILAB
    We need to recall the Fermi Paradox in this connection. Given increased evidence for a plethora of planetary systems in our galaxy we must recall that there should be evidence for multiple ongoing civilizations unless they self-destruct with Type Ia Supernovae or other similar accidents. Lets prevent this from happernning to our civilization! Thus we may conclude that the more evolved civilizations self-destruct due to their technological development. This almost occurred at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN.

    Our hope is that the newest increment towards 14 Tev will not penetrate the
    potential barrier towards de Sitter space thus releasing the force of a Type Ia Supernova. All good wishes to one and all.

    As we force our way towards sudden doom we our certainly aware of these potential dangers!

    We may note in this connection the commonly used ego-defense mechanism of denial. It would seem obvious that we shouold not pursue a course of action which would lead to universal destruction. The ego-defence mechanism of denial is unconscious and therefore can operate in the presence of a real danger. Supernova generation from experimentation
    would lend itself readily to this mode of defense and be all the more hazardous for this reason.
    Sigmund Freud is justifiably famous for his medical discoveries such as the ego-defense mechanism of denial.

    "Towards the longest run in CERN’s history
    Following the decisions taken at the Chamonix meeting, the teams are preparing the LHC to run at collision energies of 7 TeV during the coming 18-24 months. The consolidation of the nQPS connectors has been successfully completed and the magnet powering at high current has begun." Our considered opinion is this increment in energetics at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN should be sufficient to form a transition towards de Sitter space thus confiriming the generalizations of the Generalized Theory of Albert Einstein by Willem de Sitter. May God have mercy on our souls.

    "All the new electrical connectors of the nQPS have been succesfully tested.
    Since the last issue of the Bulletin, all of the approximately 4000 high-voltage electrical connectors of the new Quench Protection System (nQPS) have been replaced in record time. Teams are now upgrading the software on some of the electronic circuit boards. This work is already complete in half the machine.

    At the same time, the Hardware Commissioning group has started to power up the magnets in all the sectors. This is a lengthy process that involves gradually increasing the current to reach the 6 kA needed to steer beams at an energy of 3.5 TeV/beam. Currently, all the sectors have passed the tests at low current, and Sectors 1-2 has been successfully tested at 5 kA.

    Over the coming days, the teams plan to power all the sectors to high current in order to make them ready for “machine check-out” – the process that prepares the machine for beam operation. According to the present schedule, beams should be circulating again in the LHC towards the end of February."

    "The LHC enters a new phase
    After achieving the world record energy of 1.18 TeV per proton beam last November, the LHC is now preparing for higher energy and luminosity." Please follow this on the LHC webpage as new developments are posted periodically as we plunge towards the unknown and our doom.

    "The teams are working in the tunnel to improve the electrical reliability of the magnet protection system.
    Before the 2009 running period began, all the necessary preparations to run the LHC at the collision energy of 1.18 TeV per beam had been carried out. The goal of the technical stop, which will end mid-February, is to prepare the machine for running at 3.5 TeV per beam. In order to achieve that, a current as high as 6 kAmps will have to flow into the LHC magnets.

    The main work is taking place on the new quench protection system (nQPS) where teams are improving the electrical reliability of the connection between the Instrumentation Feedthrough Systems (IFS) on the magnets and the nQPS equipment. There are around 500 of these connectors for each of the eight sectors in the LHC that need to be repaired. These operations are necessary to ensure that higher currents can be safely handled.

    The interventions on the nQPS follow a very strict procedure that ensures an extremely accurate quality control of the repairs: after repairing the electrical connections, specialized teams make a first visual control to check that everything is properly assembled; after that, the Electrical Quality Assurance (ELQA) team performs the high voltage tests; finally, the Hardware Commissioning teams power the magnets, initially with low current and finally at 6 kAmps.

    Several teams are taking advantage of the technical stop to carry on other technical verifications and efficiency tests, for instance on some vacuum pumping units, the kicker system, the Oxygen Deficiency Hazard detectors, some ventilation components and a few others.

    At present, all teams are on schedule: the powering tests have just started in Sectors 8-1 and 1-2; Sectors 2-3, 3-4 and 4-5 will follow shortly. According to the planning Sector 1-2 will be the first sector ready for beam operation by the end of January.

    At the same time as the LHC interventions, repairs are going on at CMS on the water cooling system. All work, both in the LHC and in the CMS experiment, is expected to be completed by mid-February."

    Einstein authored the Generalized Theory of Relativity which is very well respected and established in the field of physics circa 1920, and also the Standard Model of Quantum Field Physics begun in the 1970's. The Standard Model is incomplete since it does not encompass gravitational phenomena. Since it is the extension of the
    Generalized Theory of Relativity which predicts to de Sitter space this
    would be a reliable and established prediction based on modern
    relativistic cosmology. We need only wait for the confirmation of this
    prediction with the generation of a Type Ia Supernova from CERN. Billions of dollars are being spent in this pursuit of
    confirmation of the exisence of de Sitter space in the Einstein de Sitter
    Universe as it is now termed.

    Many thanks to everyone for your most kind actions in this tragic concern.
    (Please note: World Record for Luminosity, i.e., greatest energy yet seen
    on earth) Clearly, a scientific enterprise that deals wth energies found
    only fractions of a second after the point origin of the universe should
    proceed with caution and prudence or we shall all perish!

    Of further note in this connection, is additional evidence for the
    presence of de Sitter space in astronomical observations. Type Ia
    Supernovae are more energetic than other Supernovae by a factor of some 2.4. This is the case even though the progenitor object is of some 1 solar mass or less. These objects may then be below the Chandrasekar limit necessary for the
    implosion threshold necessary for the generation of Supernovae.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernova

    Other evidence for the intrusional events from de Sitter space may be
    noted in the monopolar jets from quasars. These objects are four to five
    times larger than bipolar objects. Where the fluxional energetics of these
    variables is measured in millions of galaxies, it would appear plausible
    to assume that there is a unique source of energetics for these larger
    objects (i.e. de Sitter space) since there is a dichotomous distinction
    between Class I and Class II objects. (Burns, J. O.(1990) Chasing the
    monster's tail: new views of cosmic jets. Astronomy, (18) 8, 28-37) Recent
    observations in suppot this postulation are found in, Discovery of a
    bright quasar without a massive host galaxy (Magain, P. Letawe, G.,
    Courbin, F., Jablonka, P., Jahnke, K., Meylan, G., Wisotzki, l., (2005)
    7057, 437, pp. 381-384). Thus indicating that the enormous fluxional
    energetics of millions of galaxies over thousands of light-years extending
    for billions of years may have origin in de Sitter space or other similar
    energetic domain.

    We have received approximately a month's reprieve thanks to the excellent judgement of the great people of Switzerland. Where quantum tunnelling may occur to an exploding universe so through this same potential barrier which permits quantum tunnelling a breach in the potential barrier towards de
    Sitter space will initiate a Supernova. There is only one Supernova per civilization and all is lost.
    Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
    by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)

    The energy intensity at CERN is now testing the hypothesis that we are now at the threshold of breaching the potential barrier towards de Sitter space. Much greater increments in energy are anticpated at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN.

    "On the evening of Tuesday, 8 December, two bunches per beam circulated for the first time at 1.18 TeV for a short period and ATLAS recorded its first collisions at the record energy of 2.36 TeV (centre of mass)."

    Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
    by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)

    One of the mathematical understandings in modern cosmology is that
    De Sitter space is topologically covariant with the continuum at every
    point. Thus sufficiant energy from the Large Hadron Collider can
    penetrate the potential barier towards de Sitter space releasing the force
    of a Supernova. We are most deeply indebted to you for your kind
    interest and understanding in this matter

    We note also: in the CERN news bulletin
    "For the first time also, lead ions have arrived at the doorstep of the
    LHC." ESSAY , The Collider, The Particle and a Theory about Fate
    (The New York Times, Dennis Overbye) It may be anticipated that we can
    reset the cosmic timetable for our planet and a host of nearby stars back to the
    interstellar medium.

    A notice from the LHC administration for your interest. Please take what what action you deem
    necessary in this connection. All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf.

    "The Latest from the LHC: Towards the big chill
    With 6 sectors out of 8 at nominal cryogenic temperature (1.9 K= about
    -271 C), the commissioning at the LHC is progressing well. According to
    the present schedule, the whole machine will be cold in about two weeks.

    Final operations to fill the nitrogen tanks for cooling the last sector to
    80K.
    Only Sectors 3-4 and 6-7 are still in the cooling phase (currently between
    60 and 20 K). As already mentioned in the previous update, as soon as a
    sector reaches the nominal cryogenic temperature, teams can start powering
    the magnets. At present, the current is flowing in the magnets of three
    sectors, while the remaining three will be powered in the coming two
    weeks."

    It may be intuitively more comprehensible to perceive the influx of energy as an electrical discharge since it would be the penetration of a potential barrier towards de Sitter space which releases the force of a Type Ia Supernova.

    As cited in the astrophysical literature, the energies resident in de Sitter space are vast enough to provide for the energies in a Type Ia Supernova.
    Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
    by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)

    It may be helpful to clarify the philosophical position and astrophysical
    energetics instrinsic to de Sitter space in the standard cosmological
    model in this postulation of transition from de Sitter space as generative
    of supernova in high-energy physics experimentation.

    A philosophical position may be cited from, G. W. F. Hegel (The philosophy
    of history, New York: Dover, 249, 1956) ..." there is no essential
    existence which does not manifest itself." The very large energies derived
    by Willem de Sitter for the equations describing the false vacuum of de
    Sitter space yield an energy density of 1.69 x 10^126 for eV (electron
    volts) per cm^3. (Gott, R. (1982) Creation of open universes from de
    Sitter space, Nature, 295, 304-307. In Waldrop. M.M., (1982) Bubbles upon
    the river of time, Science, 215, 4536, 1082-1083), the energy density of
    de Sitter space is given as: 5 x 10^31 kelvin and 3 x 10^93 grams per cm^3
    , converted to eV via e=mc^2 which is Albert Einstein's famous equation.
    This energy would then find expression in the observable universe. In the
    sense of this analysis, it would be quite unlikely that energies of this
    order of magnitude would remain hidden should a transition be formed in
    the potential barrier towards de Sitter space. This would serve as an
    immediate and ever present danger for the investigator and constitutes a
    public endangerment as well.

    This is based on the mainstream theory of universe formation by Professor
    R. Gott of Princeton University in which each bubble universe forms
    smoothly out of de Sitter space. A potentially infinite number of
    universes may form in de Sitter space. In a topological sense, de Sitter
    space is cobordant at each point with the continuum (our universe). De
    Sitter space is then prevented by a large potential barrier from forming
    an intrusional event into the continuum. The essential hypothesis of this
    formulation is that with sufficiently great energetics, a classical breach
    in the potential barrier towards de Siitter space will be formed thus
    releasing the force of Type Ia supernova upon the terrestrial ecosphere,
    the solar system and those nearby stars. These energies are from de Sitter
    space, therefore; the energies of the accelerator only serve as a trigger
    for their release.

    With sufficient energies, under this postulation, we discover that the
    accelerator is in the Einstein de Sitter universe, as it is now termed,
    and we have gone from particle physics as our governing theory to
    relativistic cosmology.

    Statistically speaking, Type Ia Supernovae are distinguished by having
    much greater luminosity at point of maximum light and they are of around
    1.40 solar masses or less and also show no presence of hydrogen at maximum
    light as well. Should this be caused via a transition towards de Sitter
    space then there should be no alteration of hydrogen towards calcium or
    other elements in deflagration of Supernova Type Ia. Other types of
    supernovae of I Types show presence of helium at time of maximum light.
    Should there be exemplars of greater mass levels for Type Ia supernovae
    this would again illustrate the artifical nature, e.g., high-energy
    physics experimentation generation of a transition towards de Sitter
    space. This indicates that CERN as an experimental configuration should generate a Type Ia Supernova thus supporting the work of Albert Einstein and the generalization of the Generalized Theory of Relativity
    by Willem de Sitter.

    http://www.google.com/search?pz=1&ne...tnmeta=searc
    h%3Dsearch=Search+the+Web

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_Ia_supernova

    http://www.space.com/scienceastronom..._atypical.html

    Please note there is now a limited time frame to bring this supernova generation to the attention of the director of CERN
    where the time of onset is now this November, 2009. May we offer our services to offer to present or debate the forthcoming destruction of our planet, our solar system and a host nearby stars via the generation of a Type Ia Supernova. Please contact at: dixon at hawaii.edu

    http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/

    Where there is no evidence of either helium or hydrogen at maximum light for Type Ia supernova this would further support the hypothesis of a transition towards de Sitter space. This is evidence of a statistical nature.

    http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1996PASJ...48...51S
    Title: Type-Ia Supernova SN 1995D in NGC 2962: Optical V, R, and I Band
    Photometry and Spectra, Sadakane, K., Yokoo, T., Arimoto, J.-I., Matsumoto, K., Honda, S., Tanabe, K., ,
    Journal: Publ. of the Astronomical Society of Japan, v.48, p.51-57.
    Bibliographic Code: 1996PASJ...48...51S

    It may be noted in this connection that there is no trace of hydrogen at maximum light for Supernovae Type Ia, which indicates that the companion star for this model is statistically unlikely since most stars are are of an hydrogen dominant order. This observation supports the the origin of these supernovae via a transtion towards de Sitter space or other highly energetic flux. Please note:

    The Golden Standard Type Ia Supernova 2005cf: Observations from the
    Ultraviolet to the Near-Infrared Wavebands
    Wang, X.; Li, W.; Filippenko, A. V.; Foley, R. J.; Kirshner, R. P.;
    Modjaz, M.; Bloom, J.; Brown, P. J.; Carter, D.; Friedman, A. S.; Gal-Yam,
    A.; Ganeshalingam, M.; Hicken, M.; Krisciunas, K.; Milne, P.; Silverman,
    J. M.; Suntzeff, N. B.; Wood-Vasey, W. M.; Cenko, S. B.; Challis, P.; Fox,
    D. B.; Kirkman, D.; Li, J. Z.; Li, T. P.; Malkan, M. A.; Moore, M. R.;
    Reitzel, D. B.; Rich, R. M.; Serduke, F. J. D.; Shang, R. C.; Steele, T.
    N.; Swift, B. J.; Tao, C.; Wong, D. S.; Zhang, S. N.

    For the generation of Type Ia supernova thermonuclear explosion explanations have been proposed, none of them have withstood modern testing.
    http://www.astrophysicsspectator.com...hermonuclear.h
    tml
    Thus the formation of a transnsition towards de Sitter space may be considereed as a viable alternative
    explanatory framework. Before we take the imprudent action of testing additional energies at CERN or yet again at the Fermi Nationional Acclerator Laboratory in Batavia, Illinois, more theoretical research should be employed to verify the safety of this research in highest-energy physics or all is lost.

    An educational presentation may be provided also:
    https://laulima.hawaii.edu/access/co...1010/Education
    Paul W. Dixon is responsible for this presentation, Copyright 2009 Paul W. Dixon.

    Consider the parameters for universe formation as being similar
    to that for Type Ia Supernova generation as being very small and
    vastly energetic. This may be philosophically difficult to comprehend
    yet essentially vital for survival!

    The parameter space of inflationary cosmology is seen in the estimate of chaotic expansion theory of the universe beginning at ~10^-43 seconds after the Big Bang, point origin of the Universe with total duration of expansion of 10^-35 seconds or thereabouts. Here the region of expansion no bigger than 10^-33 cm yielding with simultaneous inflations to reach the observable size of our Universe at l<~10^28 cm .. (Andrei Linde, Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology, La Tex Harwood, Chur, Switzerland, 1990, p39) Andrei Linde is the leading authority in this important work at the Department of Physics at Stanford University.
    http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-th/pdf/0503/0503203v1.pdf

    Should we consider the hypothesis of the uniformity of nature as predictive of the abundance of living forms with some of them attaining the capacity to
    transfer themselves to our location in the universe, what can account for their absence? We may note in this connection that there is only a short delay before a transition towards de Sitter space at CERN, Fermilab or other high-energy physics experimentation has generated a Type Ia Supernova as demonstrated in this thread. The frequency of Type Ia Supernova in the observable universe would then signal the termination of these technically advanced civilizations. A technical experimental mischance may then occur before the members of the respective civilizations are philosophically ready to accept this possibllity.

    The approach of the transition towards de Sitter space at Fermilab
    with the ongoing increase in luminoisty is seen:
    http://www.fnal.gov/pub/now/tevlum.html
    with these energies are now equivalent to those found at the point
    origin of the universe. i..e. "The Big Bang."

    We need to consider the increased evidence of water on Mars and the possibilty of water
    on other planetary bodies as the source of life as well as intelligent life thus supporting the hypothesis
    that other creatures much like ourselves can be a source of Type Ia Supernovae.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7919113.stm

    It is generally agreed that the the Large Hadron Collider will provide an
    empirical test for the formation of transition towards de Sitter space.
    The collisional energetcis are much greater that those tested in the
    Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Batavia Illinois.

    "The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is being built in a circular tunnel 27 km
    in circumference. The tunnel is buried around 50 to 175 m. underground. It
    straddles the Swiss and French borders on the outskirts of Geneva.

    The first beams were circulated successfully on 10th September 2008.
    ...fortunately on 19th September a serious fault developed damaging a
    number of superconducting magnets. The repair will require a long
    technical intervention which overlaps with the planned winter shutdown.
    The LHC beam will, therefore, not see beam again before September 2009.

    The LHC is designed to collide two counter rotating beams of protons or
    heavy ions. Proton-proton collisions are foreseen at an energy of 7 TeV
    per beam."

    The competing hypothesis which is considered even more objectionable than the transition towards de Sitter space is given in the False Vacuum solution to the Einstein de Sitter equations. Yet as can be seen in this formulation high-energy physics experimentation may serve as a trigger for this most untoward event.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_vacuum

    Please note in this regard that the transition towards de Sitter space is well-known in the cosmological literature. http://www.springerlink.com/content/p8377167602421t1/

    An affidavit regarding the contingency of a Type Ia Supernova has been submitted as part of the legal action to bring a moratorium against such an experimental mischance.
    http://dockets.justia.com/docket/cou...case_id-78717/
    Many thanks for the happy birthday wishes!!!

    With the additional energies available at the LHC in CERN, it may also be possible to test the competing hypothesis of forming a transition to the lower condition in the Einstein de Sitter Universe. Following the formation of this transition, our Universe would drain off into the lower energy condition. This should be of a lesser probabilty of occurence yet it is still considered as a possible outcome to this research.

    Please note: http://professordixon.blogspot.com

    The WORLD RECORD luminosity now employed at the accelerator (Please note:
    Accelerator Division Notification on the Fermilab Home Page) is 362.37 E30.
    In scientific notation, this 362.37 x 10 to the 30th power particle interactions. With a beam energy of 10 to the 11th power electron volts, we have then the energy of the current work at Fermilab set a 362.37 x 10 to the 41st power electron volts (362.37 E 41 eV). This is much greater than the largest energies seen on earth via cosmic ray interactions at 10 to the 19th power eV (E 19 eV). Without publicity regarding this most critical danger,
    a breach in the potential barrier may occur at any moment thus releasing
    the force of a supernova on our planet and solar system. We will thus have an intrusional event from de Sitter space in the Einstein de Sitter Universe
    as it is now termed. Your kind and generous action on behalf of all
    mankind is greatly needed at this critical juncture or all is lost and we
    shall all perish.

    Please note that the return flight of the Columbia shuttle was not halted because of the false belief that the the foam shards could not cause a life threatening defect in the aerodynamic properties of the shuttle.
    http://www.reuters.com/article/lates.../idUSN30568874

    As a fictional work, the novel Anathem remarks on scientists tinkering with what they do not understand. To quote from the journal Nature, "Anathem is a shrewd exploration of what might happen if the fear of scientists meddling with things they were never meant to know becomes entirely justified." with space-time itself included in the list of potential problem areas.
    (Jennifer Rahn, Imprisoned by intelligence, Neal Stephenson, Anathem, Opinion Nature, 456, 7221, 27 November 2008, 447-447)

    It may be noted in this connection that the term Anathem refers to an ecumenical curse of severe proportions. This may be understood to mean that we are expected to take extreme exception with predjudice to the work of those who would destroy us and our children through this meddling.

    Tycho Brahe's supernova, now identified as a Type Ia Supernova, shows those characteristics as predicted by the model expected in supernova from experimentation. A large Supernova has been generated leaving behind a type G star such as is found in our solar system. (Andrea Pastorello, Astrophysics, Echo from an ancient supernova, Nature 456, 7222, 4 December 2008, 587-589) The technique of light echoes was used for this identification of an historical object.

    As noted in Chang, J.,et al., An excess of cosmic ray electrons at energies of 300-800 GeV (Nature, 456, 7220, 20 November 2008, pp. 362-365) could be tapping into "muti-dimensional spaces with potenially important implications for our understanding of the Universe." Similarly, we may postulate that Type Ia supernovae are expressing the energetics of an n-dimensional space
    whose properties may be understood with further study.

    Please note that while the Type II Supernovae have origin in 10 or more solar mass objects Type Ia Supernovae have origin in objects of some 1 solar mass.
    It may be noted in this connection that the smaller massed Supernova give rise to deflagration of some 10 billion solar luminosities whilst the larger objects give rise to some 1 billion solar luminosity deflagration objects. This difference may lend support that the energetics of Type Ia Supernovae is created via an aperture formed towards de Sitter space. As also noted in this connection, there is no trace of hydrogen at maximum light for Type Ia Supernovae thus making it statistically unlikely that they have reached the Chandrssekhar limit by accretion from a nearby solar object.

    http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...ro/snovcn.html

    The formation of Type 1a Supernovae is dependent on them reaching the Chandrasekhar limit of greater than 1.4 solar mass to implode into a Supernova according to current theory.

    http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...ro/snovcn.html

    Yet there is evidence that the Type !a Supernova can form at one solar mass
    or less thus contradicting current theory and thus supporting the alternate theory where Type Ia Suoernovae may be formed via the formation of a transition towards de Sitter space.
    Probing Dark Energy with Supernovae
    by Sebastian Ihle
    9.6.2006

    As noted in our sciforums discussion, there are a number of competing hypotheses. An empirical investigation is under way at CERN in the LHC.
    Should we generate a Type Ia Supernova, this will confirm the existence of a
    highly energetic topologically cobordant continuum termed de Sitter space.
    So far, the astrophysical theoretical generalizations of the generalized theory of relativity have been confirmed at the 100% level. The world's largest experiment may yet create a tragic confirmatiion of Albert Einstein's theory.

    Please recall that the energies now proposed for the LHC at CERN will be some 7 times greater that those employed at FERMILAB. As is well-known, the energies in use at FERMILAB approximate those predicted for those found at the point origin of the Universe. Thus even from a Common Sense perspective we may penetrate the potential barrier towards de Sitter space
    thus releasing the force of Type Ia Supernova on our planet with the increaased energies to be employed at the LHC. Please note:

    Philosophy and Common Sense (Frances)

    "Not every philosophy professor takes philosophy seriously in the sense
    that she thinks that some purely philosophical theories that go against
    common sense have a good chance to be true. These philosophers respect
    anti-commonsensical theories, in that they admit such theories are very
    important in the pursuit of philosophical understanding. But they also
    think that there is no real chance that they are true. If you have a valid
    argument based not on scientific but purely philosophical reasoning, and
    that argument concludes with something against cross-cultural and timeless
    common sense, then at least one of the premises isnt true, or so they say.
    It might be tremendously difficult to identify the mistaken premise, but
    we can start our investigation off assuming that our assumption that the
    conclusion is false is safe. These philosophers take philosophising
    seriously, of course, but they dont take seriously the idea that purely
    philosophical (so not empirical, not mathematical) theories have a good
    chance at overthrowing parts of common sense."

    A videotaped presentation of this statement is under preparation. Link to this will be provided as soon as it is made ready. This should provide a more interesting source. We welcome any suggestions you may have in this connection for illustrative material. Please let us know what Malcolm Perry would indicate regarding the formation of a transition towards de Sitter space via highest-energy physics experimentation.

    Highest energy physics is an empirical science as noted below. We may then discover through experimentation the answer to our theoretical questions
    which are then derived from observation. Should the ongoing LHC at CERN produce the Higgs boson and field, this would then be a major victory for the Standatrard Model in Physics. Should we note the generation of a Type Ia Supernova, this will further confirm the current record of 100% successful predictions of the Generalized Theory of Relavity of Albert Einstein. These energies to be generated at CERN are those energy levels seen some 10^-9 - 10^-14 seconds subsequent to the point origin of the Universe. Experimentally we note that these energies are deemed sufficient for the testing of these hypotheses.

    Please access this webpage for a thorough update on the LHC at CERN.

    http://www.lhcdefense.org/

    Generation of Type Ia Supernova via a transition to de Sitter space may be added to this description as a consequence of highest energy physics experimentation.

    There has been a brief hiatus introduced from now until April or thereabouts for the reactivation of the LHC at CERN. We should consider all possible alternatives before this gravely irresponsible experiment begins anew.

    Please recall that the activation of the Large Hadron Collider at CERN is the onset of the largest highest-energy experiment so far extant on our planet.
    The empirical observation of a Type Ia Supernova will serve as another confirmation of the Generalized Theory of Albert Einstein. This theory, as noted below, has had 100% verifcation in other astrophysical observations.
    Let us not be so rash as to further test this theory and lose all that we hold most dear as a sacrifice to the ambitions of ruthless egoism and professional incompetence. We may discover the Higgs boson and field and yet create a perforation in the potential barrier towards de Sitter space and create a Supernova. The tentative date for the onset of the collisional actions at CERN is now around May 1, 2009.

    From the LHC Machine Outreach

    The LHC is designed to collide two counter rotating beams of protons or
    heavy ions. Proton-proton collisions are foreseen at an energy of 7 TeV
    per beam.

    The WORLD RECORD luminosity now employed per example at the US accelerator (Please note:
    Accelerator Division Notification on the Fermilab Home Page) is
    288.89E30.
    In scientific
    notation, this 288.89 x 10 to the 30th power particle interactions. With
    a beam energy of 10 to the 11th power electron volts, we have then the
    energy of the current work at Fermilab set a 288.89 x 10 to the 41st
    power
    electron volts (288.89 E 41 eV). This is much greater than the largest
    energies seen on earth via cosmic ray interactions at 10 to the 19th
    power eV (E 19 eV). Without publicity regarding this most critical danger,
    a breach in the potential barrier may occur at any moment thus releasing
    the force of a supernova on our planet and solar system. We will thus have an
    intrusional event from de Sitter space in the Einstein de Sitter Universe
    as it is now termed. Your kind and generous action on behalf of all
    mankind is greatly needed at this critical juncture or all is lost and we
    shall all perish as this undergoes a vast increment at CERN.

    As one of the seven plaintiffs in the District Court in Hawaii, may I offer a formal complaint agasinst Director of CERN Robert Aymar and to John Ellis chief theoretican of CERN to appear in the International Court in the Hague to answer charges of gross negligence in the operation of the Large Hadron Collider at CERN. As noted in this post, is the formal derivation of the generation of Type Ia Supernova from their experiment following the well-known work of Albert Einstein and his colleague Willem de Sitter in the generalized theory of relativity. The energies in nature do not approximate those found some 10^-9 to 10^-14 seconds subsequent to the Big Bang at the pont origin of the Universe without forming a transition towards de Sitter space as noted per exemplar in Type II supernovae and in quasars. Their willingness to proceed with this experiment with full knowledge of this potentiallity consititutes a criminal act of public endangerment. May we request that the good people of Switzerland discontinue power service to CERN until this matter has reached full legal disposition in the International Court in the Hague.

    May I add a personal note to this discussion. We should preserve the
    future for all mankind. Children have the right to grow-up in a safe and
    sheltered environment. We need to give our children the time to dream and
    grow into all future time. We should visit other planets, other stars, other
    galaxies to see and understand all things. Let us call for patience in
    this research endeavor until we are certain of the potential dangers that
    may lurk for the unsuspecting researcher. One Supernova will terminate all
    that we hold most dear.

    Update on the research progress at CERN.

    End of July: First particles may be injected, and the commissioning with
    beams and collisions will start.
    It is expected that it will take about 2 months to have first collisions
    at 10 TeV. Please note that only one area remains at below collisional
    energies.

    We shall now observe at CERN the onset of collisional energies at far
    greater impact than those observed at Fermilab.

    http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=...der-first-beam

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7512586.stm

    The Director General of CERN Robert Aymar as well as the safety officers
    of CERN have received the appended posting. We may hope that this message
    will alert them to the forthcoming generation of a Type Ia Supernova from
    the experimental highest-energy physics at CERN. So far, as the
    preparation for the LHC experiment continues, there has been no refutation
    of the theoretical work of Albert Einstein and the extension of his
    Generalized Theory of Relativity by Willem de Sitter. This forms the basis
    of our understanding of the Einstein de Sitter Universe as it is now
    termed. A review of the cosmological perspective is provided in the generation of Type Ia Supernova:
    http://professordixon.blogspot.com/


    Please note: Cool down at CERN is near completion as all segments are in
    the blue condition. Collisional energetics should now be observed shortly.
    May God have mercy on the souls of all our children.
    http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/

    As we are in engaged in an eschatological discourse, the "philosophy of
    last things," we need to distinguish between black hole generation as well
    as strangelets and Type Ia Supernova. Their generation and their effects
    are uncertain whilst Type Ia Supernova Generation is almost completely
    certain as are as any of the effects under the auspices of Albert
    Einstein's generalized theory of relativity. Please note: Dragging of
    Inertial Frames (Ignazio Ciufloni (2007) Nature 7158, 449, 41-53) Walter
    L. Wagner and I have discusssed this. Type Ia Supernova generation will be
    sudden and the destruction of our planet, our solar system and a host of
    nearby stars will follow. Should the CERN LHC (Large Hadron Collider) cool
    down schedule proceed as now planned, an empirical test of the hypothesis
    of Type Ia Supernova generation via highest energy physics experimentation
    will commence in June/July 2008. The 7 Tev phase of the research would
    then begin at this time. Please note: http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/
    cooldown progress in preparation of the empirical test of this hypotheisis
    at the LHC in CERN as noted above.

    Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
    by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)


    It may be helpful to clarify the philosophical position and astrophysical
    energetics instrinsic to de Sitter space in the standard cosmological
    model in this postulation of transition from de Sitter space as generative
    of supernova in high-energy physics experimentation.

    A philosophical position may be cited from, G. W. F. Hegel (The philosophy
    of history, New York: Dover, 249, 1956) ..." there is no essential
    existence which does not manifest itself." The very large energies derived
    by Willem de Sitter for the equations describing the false vacuum of de
    Sitter space yield an energy density of 1.69 x 10^126 for eV (electron
    volts) per cm^3. (Gott, R. (1982) Creation of open universes from de
    Sitter space, Nature, 295, 304-307. In Waldrop. M.M., (1982) Bubbles upon
    the river of time, Science, 215, 4536, 1082-1083), the energy density of
    de Sitter space is given as: 5 x 10^31 kelvin and 3 x 10^93 grams per cm^3
    , converted to eV via e=mc^2 which is Albert Einstein's famous equation.
    This energy would then find expression in the observable universe. In the
    sense of this analysis, it would be quite unlikely that energies of this
    order of magnitude would remain hidden should a transition be formed in
    the potential barrier towards de Sitter space. This would serve as an
    immediate and ever present danger for the investigator and constitutes a
    public endangerment as well.

    This is based on the mainstream theory of universe formation by Professor
    R. Gott of Princeton University in which each bubble universe forms
    smoothly out of de Sitter space. A potentially infinite number of
    universes may form in de Sitter space. In a topological sense, de Sitter
    space is cobordant at each point with the continuum (our universe). De
    Sitter space is then prevented by a large potential barrier from forming
    an intrusional event into the continuum. The essential hypothesis of this
    formulation is that with sufficiently great energetics, a classical breach
    in the potential barrier towards de Siitter space will be formed thus
    releasing the force of Type Ia supernova upon the terrestrial ecosphere,
    the solar system and those nearby stars. These energies are from de Sitter
    space, therefore; the energies of the accelerator only serve as a trigger
    for their release.

    With sufficient energies, under this postulation, we discover that the
    accelerator is in the Einstein de Sitter universe, as it is now termed,
    and we have gone from particle physics as our governing theory to
    relativistic cosmology.

    This supports of the theoretcal position that sufficient energy will penetrate the potential barrier towards de Sitter space thus releasing the force of an exploding Universe i.e., Supernova, on our planet. The works of Albert Einstein and Willem de Sitter as shown here have never been refuted.

    From the viewpoint of classical physics, the penetration towards de Sitter space is prevented by a large though not infinite potential barrier as described by Malcolm Perry. As the energies in the collliders go from 10^-9 seconds to 10^-14 seconds subsequent to the big bang at the point origin of the Universe, this penetrance becomes inevitable thus releasing the force of a Type Ia Supernova on our planet, solar system and host of nearby stars.

    All the children will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf.

    Yours sincerely,

    Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
    Supernova from Experimentation

    Last edited by Paul W. Dixon; 04-14-10 at 10:52 AM..

    Paul W. Dixon
    View Public Profile
    Find More Posts by Paul W. Dixon

    Paul W. Dixon
    Registered Senior User (489 posts)
    05-04-10, 03:39 PM #1889

    SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT CERN AND FERMILAB

    A transition towards de Sitter space which is generative of a Type Ia Supernova is an easily detected signal. As a general principle, it may be stated that there is only one Supernova per civililization. We must then follow our research goals with caution and prudence.

    We need to recall the Fermi Paradox in this connection. Given increased evidence for a plethora of planetary systems in our galaxy we must recall that there should be evidence for multiple ongoing civilizations unless they self-destruct with Type Ia Supernovae or other similar accidents. Lets prevent this from happernning to our civilization!

    Our hope is that the newest increment towards 14 Tev will not penetrate the
    potential barrier towards de Sitter space thus releasing the force of a Type Ia Supernova. All good wishes to one and all.

    As we force our way towards sudden doom we our certainly aware of these potential dangers!

    We may note in this connection the commonly used ego-defense mechanism of denial. It would seem obvious that we shouold not pursue a course of action which would lead to universal destruction. The ego-defence mechanism of denial is unconscious and therefore can operate in the presence of a real danger. Supernova generation from experimentation
    would lend itself readily to this mode of defense and be all the more hazardous for this reason.
    Sigmund Freud is justifiably famous for his medical discoveries such as the ego-defense mechanism of denial.

    "Towards the longest run in CERN’s history
    Following the decisions taken at the Chamonix meeting, the teams are preparing the LHC to run at collision energies of 7 TeV during the coming 18-24 months. The consolidation of the nQPS connectors has been successfully completed and the magnet powering at high current has begun." Our considered opinion is this increment in energetics at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN should be sufficient to form a transition towards de Sitter space thus confiriming the generalizations of the Generalized Theory of Albert Einstein by Willem de Sitter. May God have mercy on our souls.

    "All the new electrical connectors of the nQPS have been succesfully tested.
    Since the last issue of the Bulletin, all of the approximately 4000 high-voltage electrical connectors of the new Quench Protection System (nQPS) have been replaced in record time. Teams are now upgrading the software on some of the electronic circuit boards. This work is already complete in half the machine.

    At the same time, the Hardware Commissioning group has started to power up the magnets in all the sectors. This is a lengthy process that involves gradually increasing the current to reach the 6 kA needed to steer beams at an energy of 3.5 TeV/beam. Currently, all the sectors have passed the tests at low current, and Sectors 1-2 has been successfully tested at 5 kA.

    Over the coming days, the teams plan to power all the sectors to high current in order to make them ready for “machine check-out” – the process that prepares the machine for beam operation. According to the present schedule, beams should be circulating again in the LHC towards the end of February."

    "The LHC enters a new phase
    After achieving the world record energy of 1.18 TeV per proton beam last November, the LHC is now preparing for higher energy and luminosity." Please follow this on the LHC webpage as new developments are posted periodically as we plunge towards the unknown and our doom.

    "The teams are working in the tunnel to improve the electrical reliability of the magnet protection system.
    Before the 2009 running period began, all the necessary preparations to run the LHC at the collision energy of 1.18 TeV per beam had been carried out. The goal of the technical stop, which will end mid-February, is to prepare the machine for running at 3.5 TeV per beam. In order to achieve that, a current as high as 6 kAmps will have to flow into the LHC magnets.

    The main work is taking place on the new quench protection system (nQPS) where teams are improving the electrical reliability of the connection between the Instrumentation Feedthrough Systems (IFS) on the magnets and the nQPS equipment. There are around 500 of these connectors for each of the eight sectors in the LHC that need to be repaired. These operations are necessary to ensure that higher currents can be safely handled.

    The interventions on the nQPS follow a very strict procedure that ensures an extremely accurate quality control of the repairs: after repairing the electrical connections, specialized teams make a first visual control to check that everything is properly assembled; after that, the Electrical Quality Assurance (ELQA) team performs the high voltage tests; finally, the Hardware Commissioning teams power the magnets, initially with low current and finally at 6 kAmps.

    Several teams are taking advantage of the technical stop to carry on other technical verifications and efficiency tests, for instance on some vacuum pumping units, the kicker system, the Oxygen Deficiency Hazard detectors, some ventilation components and a few others.

    At present, all teams are on schedule: the powering tests have just started in Sectors 8-1 and 1-2; Sectors 2-3, 3-4 and 4-5 will follow shortly. According to the planning Sector 1-2 will be the first sector ready for beam operation by the end of January.

    At the same time as the LHC interventions, repairs are going on at CMS on the water cooling system. All work, both in the LHC and in the CMS experiment, is expected to be completed by mid-February."

    Einstein authored the Generalized Theory of Relativity which is very well respected and established in the field of physics circa 1920, and also the Standard Model of Quantum Field Physics begun in the 1970's. The Standard Model is incomplete since it does not encompass gravitational phenomena. Since it is the extension of the
    Generalized Theory of Relativity which predicts to de Sitter space this
    would be a reliable and established prediction based on modern
    relativistic cosmology. We need only wait for the confirmation of this
    prediction with the generation of a Type Ia Supernova from CERN. Billions of dollars are being spent in this pursuit of
    confirmation of the exisence of de Sitter space in the Einstein de Sitter
    Universe as it is now termed.

    Many thanks to everyone for your most kind actions in this tragic concern.
    (Please note: World Record for Luminosity, i.e., greatest energy yet seen
    on earth) Clearly, a scientific enterprise that deals wth energies found
    only fractions of a second after the point origin of the universe should
    proceed with caution and prudence or we shall all perish!

    Of further note in this connection, is additional evidence for the
    presence of de Sitter space in astronomical observations. Type Ia
    Supernovae are more energetic than other Supernovae by a factor of some 2.4. This is the case even though the progenitor object is of some 1 solar mass or less. These objects may then be below the Chandrasekar limit necessary for the
    implosion threshold necessary for the generation of Supernovae.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernova

    Other evidence for the intrusional events from de Sitter space may be
    noted in the monopolar jets from quasars. These objects are four to five
    times larger than bipolar objects. Where the fluxional energetics of these
    variables is measured in millions of galaxies, it would appear plausible
    to assume that there is a unique source of energetics for these larger
    objects (i.e. de Sitter space) since there is a dichotomous distinction
    between Class I and Class II objects. (Burns, J. O.(1990) Chasing the
    monster's tail: new views of cosmic jets. Astronomy, (18) 8, 28-37) Recent
    observations in suppot this postulation are found in, Discovery of a
    bright quasar without a massive host galaxy (Magain, P. Letawe, G.,
    Courbin, F., Jablonka, P., Jahnke, K., Meylan, G., Wisotzki, l., (2005)
    7057, 437, pp. 381-384). Thus indicating that the enormous fluxional
    energetics of millions of galaxies over thousands of light-years extending
    for billions of years may have origin in de Sitter space or other similar
    energetic domain.

    We have received approximately a month's reprieve thanks to the excellent judgement of the great people of Switzerland. Where quantum tunnelling may occur to an exploding universe so through this same potential barrier which permits quantum tunnelling a breach in the potential barrier towards de
    Sitter space will initiate a Supernova. There is only one Supernova per civilization and all is lost.
    Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
    by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)

    The energy intensity at CERN is now testing the hypothesis that we are now at the threshold of breaching the potential barrier towards de Sitter space. Much greater increments in energy are anticpated at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN.

    "On the evening of Tuesday, 8 December, two bunches per beam circulated for the first time at 1.18 TeV for a short period and ATLAS recorded its first collisions at the record energy of 2.36 TeV (centre of mass)."

    Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
    by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)

    One of the mathematical understandings in modern cosmology is that
    De Sitter space is topologically covariant with the continuum at every
    point. Thus sufficiant energy from the Large Hadron Collider can
    penetrate the potential barier towards de Sitter space releasing the force
    of a Supernova. We are most deeply indebted to you for your kind
    interest and understanding in this matter

    We note also: in the CERN news bulletin
    "For the first time also, lead ions have arrived at the doorstep of the
    LHC." ESSAY , The Collider, The Particle and a Theory about Fate
    (The New York Times, Dennis Overbye) It may be anticipated that we can
    reset the cosmic timetable for our planet and a host of nearby stars back to the
    interstellar medium.

    A notice from the LHC administration for your interest. Please take what what action you deem
    necessary in this connection. All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf.

    "The Latest from the LHC: Towards the big chill
    With 6 sectors out of 8 at nominal cryogenic temperature (1.9 K= about
    -271 C), the commissioning at the LHC is progressing well. According to
    the present schedule, the whole machine will be cold in about two weeks.

    Final operations to fill the nitrogen tanks for cooling the last sector to
    80K.
    Only Sectors 3-4 and 6-7 are still in the cooling phase (currently between
    60 and 20 K). As already mentioned in the previous update, as soon as a
    sector reaches the nominal cryogenic temperature, teams can start powering
    the magnets. At present, the current is flowing in the magnets of three
    sectors, while the remaining three will be powered in the coming two
    weeks."

    It may be intuitively more comprehensible to perceive the influx of energy as an electrical discharge since it would be the penetration of a potential barrier towards de Sitter space which releases the force of a Type Ia Supernova.

    As cited in the astrophysical literature, the energies resident in de Sitter space are vast enough to provide for the energies in a Type Ia Supernova.
    Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
    by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)

    It may be helpful to clarify the philosophical position and astrophysical
    energetics instrinsic to de Sitter space in the standard cosmological
    model in this postulation of transition from de Sitter space as generative
    of supernova in high-energy physics experimentation.

    A philosophical position may be cited from, G. W. F. Hegel (The philosophy
    of history, New York: Dover, 249, 1956) ..." there is no essential
    existence which does not manifest itself." The very large energies derived
    by Willem de Sitter for the equations describing the false vacuum of de
    Sitter space yield an energy density of 1.69 x 10^126 for eV (electron
    volts) per cm^3. (Gott, R. (1982) Creation of open universes from de
    Sitter space, Nature, 295, 304-307. In Waldrop. M.M., (1982) Bubbles upon
    the river of time, Science, 215, 4536, 1082-1083), the energy density of
    de Sitter space is given as: 5 x 10^31 kelvin and 3 x 10^93 grams per cm^3
    , converted to eV via e=mc^2 which is Albert Einstein's famous equation.
    This energy would then find expression in the observable universe. In the
    sense of this analysis, it would be quite unlikely that energies of this
    order of magnitude would remain hidden should a transition be formed in
    the potential barrier towards de Sitter space. This would serve as an
    immediate and ever present danger for the investigator and constitutes a
    public endangerment as well.

    This is based on the mainstream theory of universe formation by Professor
    R. Gott of Princeton University in which each bubble universe forms
    smoothly out of de Sitter space. A potentially infinite number of
    universes may form in de Sitter space. In a topological sense, de Sitter
    space is cobordant at each point with the continuum (our universe). De
    Sitter space is then prevented by a large potential barrier from forming
    an intrusional event into the continuum. The essential hypothesis of this
    formulation is that with sufficiently great energetics, a classical breach
    in the potential barrier towards de Siitter space will be formed thus
    releasing the force of Type Ia supernova upon the terrestrial ecosphere,
    the solar system and those nearby stars. These energies are from de Sitter
    space, therefore; the energies of the accelerator only serve as a trigger
    for their release.

    With sufficient energies, under this postulation, we discover that the
    accelerator is in the Einstein de Sitter universe, as it is now termed,
    and we have gone from particle physics as our governing theory to
    relativistic cosmology.

    Statistically speaking, Type Ia Supernovae are distinguished by having
    much greater luminosity at point of maximum light and they are of around
    1.40 solar masses or less and also show no presence of hydrogen at maximum
    light as well. Should this be caused via a transition towards de Sitter
    space then there should be no alteration of hydrogen towards calcium or
    other elements in deflagration of Supernova Type Ia. Other types of
    supernovae of I Types show presence of helium at time of maximum light.
    Should there be exemplars of greater mass levels for Type Ia supernovae
    this would again illustrate the artifical nature, e.g., high-energy
    physics experimentation generation of a transition towards de Sitter
    space. This indicates that CERN as an experimental configuration should generate a Type Ia Supernova thus supporting the work of Albert Einstein and the generalization of the Generalized Theory of Relativity
    by Willem de Sitter.

    http://www.google.com/search?pz=1&ne...tnmeta=searc
    h%3Dsearch=Search+the+Web

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_Ia_supernova

    http://www.space.com/scienceastronom..._atypical.html

    Please note there is now a limited time frame to bring this supernova generation to the attention of the director of CERN
    where the time of onset is now this November, 2009. May we offer our services to offer to present or debate the forthcoming destruction of our planet, our solar system and a host nearby stars via the generation of a Type Ia Supernova. Please contact at: dixon at hawaii.edu

    http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/

    Where there is no evidence of either helium or hydrogen at maximum light for Type Ia supernova this would further support the hypothesis of a transition towards de Sitter space. This is evidence of a statistical nature.

    http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1996PASJ...48...51S
    Title: Type-Ia Supernova SN 1995D in NGC 2962: Optical V, R, and I Band
    Photometry and Spectra, Sadakane, K., Yokoo, T., Arimoto, J.-I., Matsumoto, K., Honda, S., Tanabe, K., ,
    Journal: Publ. of the Astronomical Society of Japan, v.48, p.51-57.
    Bibliographic Code: 1996PASJ...48...51S

    It may be noted in this connection that there is no trace of hydrogen at maximum light for Supernovae Type Ia, which indicates that the companion star for this model is statistically unlikely since most stars are are of an hydrogen dominant order. This observation supports the the origin of these supernovae via a transtion towards de Sitter space or other highly energetic flux. Please note:

    The Golden Standard Type Ia Supernova 2005cf: Observations from the
    Ultraviolet to the Near-Infrared Wavebands
    Wang, X.; Li, W.; Filippenko, A. V.; Foley, R. J.; Kirshner, R. P.;
    Modjaz, M.; Bloom, J.; Brown, P. J.; Carter, D.; Friedman, A. S.; Gal-Yam,
    A.; Ganeshalingam, M.; Hicken, M.; Krisciunas, K.; Milne, P.; Silverman,
    J. M.; Suntzeff, N. B.; Wood-Vasey, W. M.; Cenko, S. B.; Challis, P.; Fox,
    D. B.; Kirkman, D.; Li, J. Z.; Li, T. P.; Malkan, M. A.; Moore, M. R.;
    Reitzel, D. B.; Rich, R. M.; Serduke, F. J. D.; Shang, R. C.; Steele, T.
    N.; Swift, B. J.; Tao, C.; Wong, D. S.; Zhang, S. N.

    For the generation of Type Ia supernova thermonuclear explosion explanations have been proposed, none of them have withstood modern testing.
    http://www.astrophysicsspectator.com...hermonuclear.h
    tml
    Thus the formation of a transnsition towards de Sitter space may be considereed as a viable alternative
    explanatory framework. Before we take the imprudent action of testing additional energies at CERN or yet again at the Fermi Nationional Acclerator Laboratory in Batavia, Illinois, more theoretical research should be employed to verify the safety of this research in highest-energy physics or all is lost.

    An educational presentation may be provided also:
    https://laulima.hawaii.edu/access/co...1010/Education
    Paul W. Dixon is responsible for this presentation, Copyright 2009 Paul W. Dixon.

    Consider the parameters for universe formation as being similar
    to that for Type Ia Supernova generation as being very small and
    vastly energetic. This may be philosophically difficult to comprehend
    yet essentially vital for survival!

    The parameter space of inflationary cosmology is seen in the estimate of chaotic expansion theory of the universe beginning at ~10^-43 seconds after the Big Bang, point origin of the Universe with total duration of expansion of 10^-35 seconds or thereabouts. Here the region of expansion no bigger than 10^-33 cm yielding with simultaneous inflations to reach the observable size of our Universe at l<~10^28 cm .. (Andrei Linde, Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology, La Tex Harwood, Chur, Switzerland, 1990, p39) Andrei Linde is the leading authority in this important work at the Department of Physics at Stanford University.
    http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-th/pdf/0503/0503203v1.pdf

    Should we consider the hypothesis of the uniformity of nature as predictive of the abundance of living forms with some of them attaining the capacity to
    transfer themselves to our location in the universe, what can account for their absence? We may note in this connection that there is only a short delay before a transition towards de Sitter space at CERN, Fermilab or other high-energy physics experimentation has generated a Type Ia Supernova as demonstrated in this thread. The frequency of Type Ia Supernova in the observable universe would then signal the termination of these technically advanced civilizations. A technical experimental mischance may then occur before the members of the respective civilizations are philosophically ready to accept this possibllity.

    The approach of the transition towards de Sitter space at Fermilab
    with the ongoing increase in luminoisty is seen:
    http://www.fnal.gov/pub/now/tevlum.html
    with these energies are now equivalent to those found at the point
    origin of the universe. i..e. "The Big Bang."

    We need to consider the increased evidence of water on Mars and the possibilty of water
    on other planetary bodies as the source of life as well as intelligent life thus supporting the hypothesis
    that other creatures much like ourselves can be a source of Type Ia Supernovae.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7919113.stm

    It is generally agreed that the the Large Hadron Collider will provide an
    empirical test for the formation of transition towards de Sitter space.
    The collisional energetcis are much greater that those tested in the
    Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Batavia Illinois.

    "The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is being built in a circular tunnel 27 km
    in circumference. The tunnel is buried around 50 to 175 m. underground. It
    straddles the Swiss and French borders on the outskirts of Geneva.

    The first beams were circulated successfully on 10th September 2008.
    ...fortunately on 19th September a serious fault developed damaging a
    number of superconducting magnets. The repair will require a long
    technical intervention which overlaps with the planned winter shutdown.
    The LHC beam will, therefore, not see beam again before September 2009.

    The LHC is designed to collide two counter rotating beams of protons or
    heavy ions. Proton-proton collisions are foreseen at an energy of 7 TeV
    per beam."

    The competing hypothesis which is considered even more objectionable than the transition towards de Sitter space is given in the False Vacuum solution to the Einstein de Sitter equations. Yet as can be seen in this formulation high-energy physics experimentation may serve as a trigger for this most untoward event.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_vacuum

    Please note in this regard that the transition towards de Sitter space is well-known in the cosmological literature. http://www.springerlink.com/content/p8377167602421t1/

    An affidavit regarding the contingency of a Type Ia Supernova has been submitted as part of the legal action to bring a moratorium against such an experimental mischance.
    http://dockets.justia.com/docket/cou...case_id-78717/
    Many thanks for the happy birthday wishes!!!

    With the additional energies available at the LHC in CERN, it may also be possible to test the competing hypothesis of forming a transition to the lower condition in the Einstein de Sitter Universe. Following the formation of this transition, our Universe would drain off into the lower energy condition. This should be of a lesser probabilty of occurence yet it is still considered as a possible outcome to this research.

    Please note: http://professordixon.blogspot.com

    The WORLD RECORD luminosity now employed at the accelerator (Please note:
    Accelerator Division Notification on the Fermilab Home Page) is 362.37 E30.
    In scientific notation, this 362.37 x 10 to the 30th power particle interactions. With a beam energy of 10 to the 11th power electron volts, we have then the energy of the current work at Fermilab set a 362.37 x 10 to the 41st power electron volts (362.37 E 41 eV). This is much greater than the largest energies seen on earth via cosmic ray interactions at 10 to the 19th power eV (E 19 eV). Without publicity regarding this most critical danger,
    a breach in the potential barrier may occur at any moment thus releasing
    the force of a supernova on our planet and solar system. We will thus have an intrusional event from de Sitter space in the Einstein de Sitter Universe
    as it is now termed. Your kind and generous action on behalf of all
    mankind is greatly needed at this critical juncture or all is lost and we
    shall all perish.

    Please note that the return flight of the Columbia shuttle was not halted because of the false belief that the the foam shards could not cause a life threatening defect in the aerodynamic properties of the shuttle.
    http://www.reuters.com/article/lates.../idUSN30568874

    As a fictional work, the novel Anathem remarks on scientists tinkering with what they do not understand. To quote from the journal Nature, "Anathem is a shrewd exploration of what might happen if the fear of scientists meddling with things they were never meant to know becomes entirely justified." with space-time itself included in the list of potential problem areas.
    (Jennifer Rahn, Imprisoned by intelligence, Neal Stephenson, Anathem, Opinion Nature, 456, 7221, 27 November 2008, 447-447)

    It may be noted in this connection that the term Anathem refers to an ecumenical curse of severe proportions. This may be understood to mean that we are expected to take extreme exception with predjudice to the work of those who would destroy us and our children through this meddling.

    Tycho Brahe's supernova, now identified as a Type Ia Supernova, shows those characteristics as predicted by the model expected in supernova from experimentation. A large Supernova has been generated leaving behind a type G star such as is found in our solar system. (Andrea Pastorello, Astrophysics, Echo from an ancient supernova, Nature 456, 7222, 4 December 2008, 587-589) The technique of light echoes was used for this identification of an historical object.

    As noted in Chang, J.,et al., An excess of cosmic ray electrons at energies of 300-800 GeV (Nature, 456, 7220, 20 November 2008, pp. 362-365) could be tapping into "muti-dimensional spaces with potenially important implications for our understanding of the Universe." Similarly, we may postulate that Type Ia supernovae are expressing the energetics of an n-dimensional space
    whose properties may be understood with further study.

    Please note that while the Type II Supernovae have origin in 10 or more solar mass objects Type Ia Supernovae have origin in objects of some 1 solar mass.
    It may be noted in this connection that the smaller massed Supernova give rise to deflagration of some 10 billion solar luminosities whilst the larger objects give rise to some 1 billion solar luminosity deflagration objects. This difference may lend support that the energetics of Type Ia Supernovae is created via an aperture formed towards de Sitter space. As also noted in this connection, there is no trace of hydrogen at maximum light for Type Ia Supernovae thus making it statistically unlikely that they have reached the Chandrssekhar limit by accretion from a nearby solar object.

    http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...ro/snovcn.html

    The formation of Type 1a Supernovae is dependent on them reaching the Chandrasekhar limit of greater than 1.4 solar mass to implode into a Supernova according to current theory.

    http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...ro/snovcn.html

    Yet there is evidence that the Type !a Supernova can form at one solar mass
    or less thus contradicting current theory and thus supporting the alternate theory where Type Ia Suoernovae may be formed via the formation of a transition towards de Sitter space.
    Probing Dark Energy with Supernovae
    by Sebastian Ihle
    9.6.2006

    As noted in our sciforums discussion, there are a number of competing hypotheses. An empirical investigation is under way at CERN in the LHC.
    Should we generate a Type Ia Supernova, this will confirm the existence of a
    highly energetic topologically cobordant continuum termed de Sitter space.
    So far, the astrophysical theoretical generalizations of the generalized theory of relativity have been confirmed at the 100% level. The world's largest experiment may yet create a tragic confirmatiion of Albert Einstein's theory.

    Please recall that the energies now proposed for the LHC at CERN will be some 7 times greater that those employed at FERMILAB. As is well-known, the energies in use at FERMILAB approximate those predicted for those found at the point origin of the Universe. Thus even from a Common Sense perspective we may penetrate the potential barrier towards de Sitter space
    thus releasing the force of Type Ia Supernova on our planet with the increaased energies to be employed at the LHC. Please note:

    Philosophy and Common Sense (Frances)

    "Not every philosophy professor takes philosophy seriously in the sense
    that she thinks that some purely philosophical theories that go against
    common sense have a good chance to be true. These philosophers respect
    anti-commonsensical theories, in that they admit such theories are very
    important in the pursuit of philosophical understanding. But they also
    think that there is no real chance that they are true. If you have a valid
    argument based not on scientific but purely philosophical reasoning, and
    that argument concludes with something against cross-cultural and timeless
    common sense, then at least one of the premises isnt true, or so they say.
    It might be tremendously difficult to identify the mistaken premise, but
    we can start our investigation off assuming that our assumption that the
    conclusion is false is safe. These philosophers take philosophising
    seriously, of course, but they dont take seriously the idea that purely
    philosophical (so not empirical, not mathematical) theories have a good
    chance at overthrowing parts of common sense."

    A videotaped presentation of this statement is under preparation. Link to this will be provided as soon as it is made ready. This should provide a more interesting source. We welcome any suggestions you may have in this connection for illustrative material. Please let us know what Malcolm Perry would indicate regarding the formation of a transition towards de Sitter space via highest-energy physics experimentation.

    Highest energy physics is an empirical science as noted below. We may then discover through experimentation the answer to our theoretical questions
    which are then derived from observation. Should the ongoing LHC at CERN produce the Higgs boson and field, this would then be a major victory for the Standatrard Model in Physics. Should we note the generation of a Type Ia Supernova, this will further confirm the current record of 100% successful predictions of the Generalized Theory of Relavity of Albert Einstein. These energies to be generated at CERN are those energy levels seen some 10^-9 - 10^-14 seconds subsequent to the point origin of the Universe. Experimentally we note that these energies are deemed sufficient for the testing of these hypotheses.

    Please access this webpage for a thorough update on the LHC at CERN.

    http://www.lhcdefense.org/

    Generation of Type Ia Supernova via a transition to de Sitter space may be added to this description as a consequence of highest energy physics experimentation.

    There has been a brief hiatus introduced from now until April or thereabouts for the reactivation of the LHC at CERN. We should consider all possible alternatives before this gravely irresponsible experiment begins anew.

    Please recall that the activation of the Large Hadron Collider at CERN is the onset of the largest highest-energy experiment so far extant on our planet.
    The empirical observation of a Type Ia Supernova will serve as another confirmation of the Generalized Theory of Albert Einstein. This theory, as noted below, has had 100% verifcation in other astrophysical observations.
    Let us not be so rash as to further test this theory and lose all that we hold most dear as a sacrifice to the ambitions of ruthless egoism and professional incompetence. We may discover the Higgs boson and field and yet create a perforation in the potential barrier towards de Sitter space and create a Supernova. The tentative date for the onset of the collisional actions at CERN is now around May 1, 2009.

    From the LHC Machine Outreach

    The LHC is designed to collide two counter rotating beams of protons or
    heavy ions. Proton-proton collisions are foreseen at an energy of 7 TeV
    per beam.

    The WORLD RECORD luminosity now employed per example at the US accelerator (Please note:
    Accelerator Division Notification on the Fermilab Home Page) is
    288.89E30.
    In scientific
    notation, this 288.89 x 10 to the 30th power particle interactions. With
    a beam energy of 10 to the 11th power electron volts, we have then the
    energy of the current work at Fermilab set a 288.89 x 10 to the 41st
    power
    electron volts (288.89 E 41 eV). This is much greater than the largest
    energies seen on earth via cosmic ray interactions at 10 to the 19th
    power eV (E 19 eV). Without publicity regarding this most critical danger,
    a breach in the potential barrier may occur at any moment thus releasing
    the force of a supernova on our planet and solar system. We will thus have an
    intrusional event from de Sitter space in the Einstein de Sitter Universe
    as it is now termed. Your kind and generous action on behalf of all
    mankind is greatly needed at this critical juncture or all is lost and we
    shall all perish as this undergoes a vast increment at CERN.

    As one of the seven plaintiffs in the District Court in Hawaii, may I offer a formal complaint agasinst Director of CERN Robert Aymar and to John Ellis chief theoretican of CERN to appear in the International Court in the Hague to answer charges of gross negligence in the operation of the Large Hadron Collider at CERN. As noted in this post, is the formal derivation of the generation of Type Ia Supernova from their experiment following the well-known work of Albert Einstein and his colleague Willem de Sitter in the generalized theory of relativity. The energies in nature do not approximate those found some 10^-9 to 10^-14 seconds subsequent to the Big Bang at the pont origin of the Universe without forming a transition towards de Sitter space as noted per exemplar in Type II supernovae and in quasars. Their willingness to proceed with this experiment with full knowledge of this potentiallity consititutes a criminal act of public endangerment. May we request that the good people of Switzerland discontinue power service to CERN until this matter has reached full legal disposition in the International Court in the Hague.

    May I add a personal note to this discussion. We should preserve the
    future for all mankind. Children have the right to grow-up in a safe and
    sheltered environment. We need to give our children the time to dream and
    grow into all future time. We should visit other planets, other stars, other
    galaxies to see and understand all things. Let us call for patience in
    this research endeavor until we are certain of the potential dangers that
    may lurk for the unsuspecting researcher. One Supernova will terminate all
    that we hold most dear.

    Update on the research progress at CERN.

    End of July: First particles may be injected, and the commissioning with
    beams and collisions will start.
    It is expected that it will take about 2 months to have first collisions
    at 10 TeV. Please note that only one area remains at below collisional
    energies.

    We shall now observe at CERN the onset of collisional energies at far
    greater impact than those observed at Fermilab.

    http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=...der-first-beam

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7512586.stm

    The Director General of CERN Robert Aymar as well as the safety officers
    of CERN have received the appended posting. We may hope that this message
    will alert them to the forthcoming generation of a Type Ia Supernova from
    the experimental highest-energy physics at CERN. So far, as the
    preparation for the LHC experiment continues, there has been no refutation
    of the theoretical work of Albert Einstein and the extension of his
    Generalized Theory of Relativity by Willem de Sitter. This forms the basis
    of our understanding of the Einstein de Sitter Universe as it is now
    termed. A review of the cosmological perspective is provided in the generation of Type Ia Supernova:
    http://professordixon.blogspot.com/


    Please note: Cool down at CERN is near completion as all segments are in
    the blue condition. Collisional energetics should now be observed shortly.
    May God have mercy on the souls of all our children.
    http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/

    As we are in engaged in an eschatological discourse, the "philosophy of
    last things," we need to distinguish between black hole generation as well
    as strangelets and Type Ia Supernova. Their generation and their effects
    are uncertain whilst Type Ia Supernova Generation is almost completely
    certain as are as any of the effects under the auspices of Albert
    Einstein's generalized theory of relativity. Please note: Dragging of
    Inertial Frames (Ignazio Ciufloni (2007) Nature 7158, 449, 41-53) Walter
    L. Wagner and I have discusssed this. Type Ia Supernova generation will be
    sudden and the destruction of our planet, our solar system and a host of
    nearby stars will follow. Should the CERN LHC (Large Hadron Collider) cool
    down schedule proceed as now planned, an empirical test of the hypothesis
    of Type Ia Supernova generation via highest energy physics experimentation
    will commence in June/July 2008. The 7 Tev phase of the research would
    then begin at this time. Please note: http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/
    cooldown progress in preparation of the empirical test of this hypotheisis
    at the LHC in CERN as noted above.

    Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
    by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)


    It may be helpful to clarify the philosophical position and astrophysical
    energetics instrinsic to de Sitter space in the standard cosmological
    model in this postulation of transition from de Sitter space as generative
    of supernova in high-energy physics experimentation.

    A philosophical position may be cited from, G. W. F. Hegel (The philosophy
    of history, New York: Dover, 249, 1956) ..." there is no essential
    existence which does not manifest itself." The very large energies derived
    by Willem de Sitter for the equations describing the false vacuum of de
    Sitter space yield an energy density of 1.69 x 10^126 for eV (electron
    volts) per cm^3. (Gott, R. (1982) Creation of open universes from de
    Sitter space, Nature, 295, 304-307. In Waldrop. M.M., (1982) Bubbles upon
    the river of time, Science, 215, 4536, 1082-1083), the energy density of
    de Sitter space is given as: 5 x 10^31 kelvin and 3 x 10^93 grams per cm^3
    , converted to eV via e=mc^2 which is Albert Einstein's famous equation.
    This energy would then find expression in the observable universe. In the
    sense of this analysis, it would be quite unlikely that energies of this
    order of magnitude would remain hidden should a transition be formed in
    the potential barrier towards de Sitter space. This would serve as an
    immediate and ever present danger for the investigator and constitutes a
    public endangerment as well.

    This is based on the mainstream theory of universe formation by Professor
    R. Gott of Princeton University in which each bubble universe forms
    smoothly out of de Sitter space. A potentially infinite number of
    universes may form in de Sitter space. In a topological sense, de Sitter
    space is cobordant at each point with the continuum (our universe). De
    Sitter space is then prevented by a large potential barrier from forming
    an intrusional event into the continuum. The essential hypothesis of this
    formulation is that with sufficiently great energetics, a classical breach
    in the potential barrier towards de Siitter space will be formed thus
    releasing the force of Type Ia supernova upon the terrestrial ecosphere,
    the solar system and those nearby stars. These energies are from de Sitter
    space, therefore; the energies of the accelerator only serve as a trigger
    for their release.

    With sufficient energies, under this postulation, we discover that the
    accelerator is in the Einstein de Sitter universe, as it is now termed,
    and we have gone from particle physics as our governing theory to
    relativistic cosmology.

    This supports of the theoretcal position that sufficient energy will penetrate the potential barrier towards de Sitter space thus releasing the force of an exploding Universe i.e., Supernova, on our planet. The works of Albert Einstein and Willem de Sitter as shown here have never been refuted.

    From the viewpoint of classical physics, the penetration towards de Sitter space is prevented by a large though not infinite potential barrier as described by Malcolm Perry. As the energies in the collliders go from 10^-9 seconds to 10^-14 seconds subsequent to the big bang at the point origin of the Universe, this penetrance becomes inevitable thus releasing the force of a Type Ia Supernova on our planet, solar system and host of nearby stars.

    All the children will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf.

    Yours sincerely,

    Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
    Supernova from Experimentation
     
    Last edited: May 30, 2010
  15. jsispat SURESH BANSAL Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    209
    Meteorites contains amino acid and proteins( neccessary for seeds ) and they are seeds of planets.first meteorites germinate in asteroids and after that some asteroids convert in big planets. this is the only complete mechanism of planet formation. or we can say planets have biological growth like a tree and having same bark around it . one planet is a result of one meteor only.i need your help on this issue.i have lot of visual and intelligent evidence that we can go in this direction. however i have not any scientific evidence as i am without any facility.i am just a small metal man only.
    sureshbansal342@gmail.com
     
  16. Billy T Use Sugar Cane Alcohol car Fuel Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,198
    jsispat should be permanently banned as is only spamming both threads and sending PMs stating his non-sense theory. He sent me a PM on it and I replied as follows:

    "... The idea that the entire earth is a living organism is old. Unfortunately I forget the n ame of this idea, just now.

    As far as the idea that the earth is "growing like a tree" is concerned, even only a figurative interpretation, that is false. The mass of the earth is very slowly changing - so slowly that one can not be sure if it is increasing or decreasing. The increase does come from other solar system object striking the earth, but even that can also when they are large cause a net loss in Earths mass. Some believe that the mass of the moon was lost from the Earth during a very violent impact.
    The Earth is continuously losing gas atoms in the high atmosphere. Probably there was definitely a net gain in mass during the early history of the Earth when there were many more small solar system bodies striking the earth.

    As far as "meteors contains amino acids" that is possible but difficult to rule out contamination while waiting to be discovered, even if some claim they are inside. (Simple organisms are found deep in the earth's crustal rocks, etc.) Many thousands more of these meteors reach the surface of the moon each day than reach the surface of the Earth because most small Earth bound ones burn up in the Earth's atmosphere with temperatures that would destroy all but the simplest molecules. AFAIK, despite this thousands of times greater flux of meteors onto each square meter of the moon, never has any amino acid been found on the moon.

    Even it the simple molecules of life were fall from the sky, that only moves the question of how life arrose to another planet. (Much like explaining creation by "god made it" only move the question of origins one step back -I.e. Where did God came from? - a greater GOD, perhaps, but where did that GOD, come from? etc.) Postulating that some other planet made amino acids from atoms is neither an explanation nor probable as there are few, (if any?) planets which have the conditions (such as liquid H2O, etc.) as favorable to the generation of life as Earth has. Life has arisen on earth more than once - there are complex and varied organisms living without oxygen or sunlight in near the deep ocean vents. Some of the "tube worms" there are several feet long.

    SUMMARY: Your ideas are nether new and mainly implausible compared to the conventional POV that life originated on earth from simple physical chemistry. "


    He has no intention of participating in scientific discussions, as he totally ignored the points I made in the above reply and again sent me a PM "reply" simply stating his crazy theory again. Sciforums does not need people like jsispat SPAMING threads and refusing to respond to people willing to show him why his ideas are non-sense. For example, as I discussed above the total mass of the earth cannot come from capture of asteroids etc. or "grow like a plant," which gets its mass increase from the air's CO2 and soil minerals, water included.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 5, 2010
  17. (Q) Encephaloid Martini Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,125
    I've noticed that since I've not been moderating this forum anymore, Paul has gone back to his old ways of spamming the same stuff over and over again, ad nauseum.
     
  18. Paul W. Dixon Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    505
    Dear Kind Reader,

    Please inform me as to why there is evidence of symmetrey in the world of subatomic physics as well as the in the biological world with bilateral and
    and radial symmetry, etc.. Without this universe's characateristic would the rules of mathematics still be useful instruments of understanding? Would our universe among a potentially infinite number of universes have this unique characteristic while other universes do not!

    These are urgent questions.
    Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
    Supernova from Experimentation
     
  19. Billy T Use Sugar Cane Alcohol car Fuel Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,198
    To Paul: Congratulations on a short post with no cut and paste from old ones. (A first for you I think.)

    I have forgotten much, but most of sub atomic physic does have CPT symmetry, but a couple of Chinese-Americans got the Nobel Prize more than a decade ago, for showing that some decays do not. (Some use this fact to explain why the universe is “mater dominated” instead of an equal mix of matter and anti-mater.)

    Certainly the rules of mathematics, which I believe are true in all possible universes because math is a tautology closed unto its self and not about any material objects, would still be useful. The formulae which physicist use in other universes to describe their universe would be different if the physical laws are different, but 2+3 would still be 5, etc.

    If I understand your last question, I just answered it. I.e. the logic of math would be useful in ALL possible universes. So our universe is not unique in finding that math is useful. Math would be useful in any universe with physical laws.

    PS, when I get to be God and make a universe, its physical laws will be purely classical (no relativity). Our universe was created by a sadistic God. (I think that requires that the speed of light is not constant but frame dependent, like the speed of a bullet.) It might be interesting, more so than this thread has been for some time, to discuss what a "purely classical" universe would be like.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 12, 2010
  20. Paul W. Dixon Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    505
    Dear Kind Reader,

    Do the perturbations due to adiabatic energies (Without heat transfer to environmenmt) in the heat energies in the postulated Higgs field indicate some support that there is a theoretical expectation for a symmetric basic structure to this field? Would this follow in looking at the point origin of the universe using an inflationary model? As a reference, the cosmology of Andrei Linde as cited in Brian Greene (In: The Elegant Universe or The Fabric of the Universe) with a string theory theoretical exegesisis is cited and may be useful in this connection.

    Please comment in this urgent matter.

    Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
    Supernova from Experimentation
     
    Last edited: Aug 21, 2010
  21. Billy T Use Sugar Cane Alcohol car Fuel Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,198
    Your questions are far above my ability to answer. I hope someone who can will try; however, I think it nearly impossible for any type of perturbation to create any type of symmetry when it did not exist in the absence of the perturbation. I bet the best one can hope for is that the perturbation does not break or reduce an existing symmetry.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 21, 2010
  22. Paul W. Dixon Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    505
    Dear Earnest Reader:
    Perhaps some construction that would combine de Sitter space and quantum mechanics my suffice for this symmetric construction at the basis of at least a five dimensional space time.
    "Discussion
    Could we say that there exists a CFT associated to the so-constructed euclidean conformal
    correlation functions? If the original dS theory does not satisfy the positive-deniteness
    property the best that one can do in general is to use the GNS construction to build a linear
    space endowed with a (non-positive or indenite metric) inner product and an operator
    valued distribution O() having such euclidean correlation functions.
    But even if one has positive-deniteness in the dS theory, i.e. if the dS theory has
    a direct physical interpretation, the construction does not guarantee that also the limiting
    euclidean theory is positive denite and the GNS construction gives an Hilbert space, because
    coinciding points are not in general under control (this is the unitarity property mentioned
    in [1]).
    However this still does not settle the question of the physical meaning of the asymptotic
    theory. Indeed it is well known that the only meaningful notion of positivity for euclidean
    theories to admit a direct physical interpretation is the so-called Osterwalder-Schrader pos-
    itivity or reflection positivity (and not positive-deniteness); it is the only condition which
    allows the reconstruction of quantities at real time through an appropriate Wick-rotation
    from the Euclidean n-point functions.
    Unfortunately there is no way to show that the asymptotic theory has such a property,
    and actually in general it will not1, even if in some lucky case this property may still hold.
    This generic situation will be illustrated by the following free eld examples [1, 2].
    6 Klein-Gordon elds
    Let us consider now the de Sitter Klein-Gordon equation
    2 + m2 = 0; (42)
    where 2 is the Laplace-Beltrami operator relative to the de Sitter metric and m2 is a complex
    number. It is possible to solve in a coordinate-independent way [4] by using the previous
    embedding of the de Sitter hyperboloid in the Minkowski ambient space. First of all one
    introduces plane waves solving the KG equation; these waves are similar to the Minkowskian
    exponentials but with the important dierence that they are singular on (d−1)-dimensional
    light-like submanifolds of dSd. The physically relevant global waves can be dened as analytic
    functions for z in the tubular domains T+ or T− of dS(c)
    d ; for Z 2 T+ or Z 2 T− we dene
    (d)
    i (Z; ) = (Z )−d−1
    2 +i ; (43)
    where is a complex number and = (0; : : : d) belongs to C+. The phase is chosen to
    be zero when the argument is real and positive. Physical values of the parameter are
    real (principal series of representations) or purely imaginary with jj d−1
    2 (complementary
    series of represenatations), corresponding to a real and positive m2:
    m2 =

    d − 1
    2

    2
    + 2 > 0: (44)
    but we will study the limit for generic complex . The corresponding QFT is completely
    encoded in the two-point function W (X;X0) which should be a distribution on dSd dSd
    1This is in contrast with what would happen with Euclidean sections of a Minkowskian theory, if a similar
    construction to the present one was performed. In that case reflection positivity would hold. The reason for this
    dierence resides in the lack of translation invariance of the curved case.
    9
    satisfying the conditions of locality de Sitter invariance; positive-deniteness will hold only
    for physical values of m2. W(X;X0) should solve the KG w.r.t. both variables:

    2X + m2

    W(X;X
    0) = 0;

    2X0 + m2

    W(X;X
    0) = 0: (45)
    There are innitely many inequivalent solutions to this problem, but there is one preferred
    theory (for each value of the mass m) which is usally referred to as the \Euclidean" or
    Bunch-Davies vacuum [11, 12, 4]; what is perhaps not so well known is that these elds
    can be directly constructed in a manifestly de Sitter invariant way [4] by exploiting the
    previous dS plane waves. Indeed it is possible to give a spectral analysis of the two-point
    functions very similar to the Fourier analysis usually done in the flat Minkowski case. This
    is constructed as follows: for Z 2 T−, Z0 2 T+ the Wightman function can be represented as
    a superposition of plane waves in the complex domain T− T+ [4]:
    Wd
    (Z;Z
    0) = cd;
    Z


    (d)
    i (Z; ) (d)
    −i (Z
    0
    ; )d
    () (46)
    with
    cd; =
    1
    2(2)d

    d − 1
    2
    + i



    d − 1
    2
    − i

    e
    −: (47)
    The integration can be performed along any basis submanifold
    of the cone C+ (i.e. a
    submanifold intersecting almost all the generatrices of the cone) w.r.t. a corresponding
    measure d
    induced by the invariant measure on the cone. For instance, one can integrate
    on the manifold
    d =
    +
    d
    [


    d = f 2 C+ : d = 1g [ f 2 C+ : d = −1g, which is a pair of
    hyperboloids; in this case the measure d
    looks like the Lorentz invariant measure on the
    mass shell. For the spherical basis
    0 = f 2 C+ : 0 = 1g the measure d
    is exactly the
    rotation invariant measure (on the sphere).
    The function Wd
    manifestly solves the (complex) de Sitter Klein-Gordon equation in
    both variables, and is analytic in the domain T− T+. It can be shown that it is actually a
    function of the de Sitter invariant variable (Z − Z0)2 = −2 − 2Z Z0. This property allows
    the explicit computation
    Wd
    (Z;Z
    0) =
    1
    2(2)d
    2


    d − 1
    2
    + i



    d − 1
    2
    − i

    ((Z Z
    0)2 − 1)−d−2
    4 P
    −d−2
    2
    −1
    2 +i (Z Z
    0) ;
    (48)
    where P
    −d−2
    2
    −1
    2 +i () is Legendre function of the rst kind [13]. At vanishingly short distances
    the Wightman function has the local Hadamard universal behaviour:
    Wd
    (Z;Z
    0) ' (d−2
    2 )
    2(2)d
    2
    [−(Z − Z
    0)2]−d−2
    2 : (49)
    By equation (48) one sees thatWd
    (z; z0) is maximally analytic, i.e. can be analytically contin-
    ued in the \cut-domain" dS(c)
    d
    dS(c)
    d
    n f(z; z0) 2 dS(c)
    d
    dS(c)
    d : (Z−Z0)2 0g. Furthermore,
    Wd
    (Z;Z0) satises in this cut-domain the complex covariance condition: Wd
    (gZ; gZ0) =
    Wd
    (Z;Z0) for all g in the complex de Sitter group2.
    As a function of the parameter the two-point function W is analytic and symmetric:
    Wd
    − = Wd
    ."
    Many thanks for your kind attention.

    Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
    Supernova from Experimentation
     
  23. Lamont Cranston Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    137
    I get the impression that the above means something. What is the conclusion on this, wrt Fermilab or the LHC? Thank you.
     

Share This Page