Supernova From Experimentation At Fermilab

Discussion in 'Astronomy, Exobiology, & Cosmology' started by Paul W. Dixon, Feb 28, 2001.

  1. Paul W. Dixon Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    505
    SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT CERN AND FERMILAB

    Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
    by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)

    One of the mathematical understandings in modern cosmology is that
    De Sitter space is topologically covariant with the continuum at every
    point. Thus sufficiant energy from the Large Hadron Collider can
    penetrate the potential barier towards de Sitter space releasing the force
    of a Supernova. We are most deeply indebted to you for your kind
    interest and understanding in this matter

    We note also: in the CERN news bulletin
    "For the first time also, lead ions have arrived at the doorstep of the
    LHC." ESSAY , The Collider, The Particle and a Theory about Fate
    (The New York Times, Dennis Overbye) It may be anticipated that we can
    reset the cosmic timetable for our planet and a host of nearby stars back to the
    interstellar medium.

    A notice from the LHC administration for your interest. Please take what what action you deem
    necessary in this connection. All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf.

    "The Latest from the LHC: Towards the big chill
    With 6 sectors out of 8 at nominal cryogenic temperature (1.9 K= about
    -271 C), the commissioning at the LHC is progressing well. According to
    the present schedule, the whole machine will be cold in about two weeks.

    Final operations to fill the nitrogen tanks for cooling the last sector to
    80K.
    Only Sectors 3-4 and 6-7 are still in the cooling phase (currently between
    60 and 20 K). As already mentioned in the previous update, as soon as a
    sector reaches the nominal cryogenic temperature, teams can start powering
    the magnets. At present, the current is flowing in the magnets of three
    sectors, while the remaining three will be powered in the coming two
    weeks."

    It may be intuitively more comprehensible to perceive the influx of energy as an electrical discharge since it would be the penetration of a potential barrier towards de Sitter space which releases the force of a Type Ia Supernova.

    As cited in the astrophysical literature, the energies resident in de Sitter space are vast enough to provide for the energies in a Type Ia Supernova.
    Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
    by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)

    It may be helpful to clarify the philosophical position and astrophysical
    energetics instrinsic to de Sitter space in the standard cosmological
    model in this postulation of transition from de Sitter space as generative
    of supernova in high-energy physics experimentation.

    A philosophical position may be cited from, G. W. F. Hegel (The philosophy
    of history, New York: Dover, 249, 1956) ..." there is no essential
    existence which does not manifest itself." The very large energies derived
    by Willem de Sitter for the equations describing the false vacuum of de
    Sitter space yield an energy density of 1.69 x 10^126 for eV (electron
    volts) per cm^3. (Gott, R. (1982) Creation of open universes from de
    Sitter space, Nature, 295, 304-307. In Waldrop. M.M., (1982) Bubbles upon
    the river of time, Science, 215, 4536, 1082-1083), the energy density of
    de Sitter space is given as: 5 x 10^31 kelvin and 3 x 10^93 grams per cm^3
    , converted to eV via e=mc^2 which is Albert Einstein's famous equation.
    This energy would then find expression in the observable universe. In the
    sense of this analysis, it would be quite unlikely that energies of this
    order of magnitude would remain hidden should a transition be formed in
    the potential barrier towards de Sitter space. This would serve as an
    immediate and ever present danger for the investigator and constitutes a
    public endangerment as well.

    This is based on the mainstream theory of universe formation by Professor
    R. Gott of Princeton University in which each bubble universe forms
    smoothly out of de Sitter space. A potentially infinite number of
    universes may form in de Sitter space. In a topological sense, de Sitter
    space is cobordant at each point with the continuum (our universe). De
    Sitter space is then prevented by a large potential barrier from forming
    an intrusional event into the continuum. The essential hypothesis of this
    formulation is that with sufficiently great energetics, a classical breach
    in the potential barrier towards de Siitter space will be formed thus
    releasing the force of Type Ia supernova upon the terrestrial ecosphere,
    the solar system and those nearby stars. These energies are from de Sitter
    space, therefore; the energies of the accelerator only serve as a trigger
    for their release.

    With sufficient energies, under this postulation, we discover that the
    accelerator is in the Einstein de Sitter universe, as it is now termed,
    and we have gone from particle physics as our governing theory to
    relativistic cosmology.

    Statistically speaking, Type Ia Supernovae are distinguished by having
    much greater luminosity at point of maximum light and they are of around
    1.40 solar masses or less and also show no presence of hydrogen at maximum
    light as well. Should this be caused via a transition towards de Sitter
    space then there should be no alteration of hydrogen towards calcium or
    other elements in deflagration of Supernova Type Ia. Other types of
    supernovae of I Types show presence of helium at time of maximum light.
    Should there be exemplars of greater mass levels for Type Ia supernovae
    this would again illustrate the artifical nature, e.g., high-energy
    physics experimentation generation of a transition towards de Sitter
    space. This indicates that CERN as an experimental configuration should generate a Type Ia Supernova thus supporting the work of Albert Einstein and the generalization of the Generalized Theory of Relativity
    by Willem de Sitter.

    http://www.google.com/search?pz=1&ne...tnmeta=searc
    h%3Dsearch=Search+the+Web

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_Ia_supernova

    http://www.space.com/scienceastronom..._atypical.html

    Please note there is now a limited time frame to bring this supernova generation to the attention of the director of CERN
    where the time of onset is now this November, 2009. May we offer our services to offer to present or debate the forthcoming destruction of our planet, our solar system and a host nearby stars via the generation of a Type Ia Supernova. Please contact at: dixon at hawaii.edu

    http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/

    Where there is no evidence of either helium or hydrogen at maximum light for Type Ia supernova this would further support the hypothesis of a transition towards de Sitter space. This is evidence of a statistical nature.

    http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1996PASJ...48...51S
    Title: Type-Ia Supernova SN 1995D in NGC 2962: Optical V, R, and I Band
    Photometry and Spectra, Sadakane, K., Yokoo, T., Arimoto, J.-I., Matsumoto, K., Honda, S., Tanabe, K., ,
    Journal: Publ. of the Astronomical Society of Japan, v.48, p.51-57.
    Bibliographic Code: 1996PASJ...48...51S

    It may be noted in this connection that there is no trace of hydrogen at maximum light for Supernovae Type Ia, which indicates that the companion star for this model is statistically unlikely since most stars are are of an hydrogen dominant order. This observation supports the the origin of these supernovae via a transtion towards de Sitter space or other highly energetic flux. Please note:

    The Golden Standard Type Ia Supernova 2005cf: Observations from the
    Ultraviolet to the Near-Infrared Wavebands
    Wang, X.; Li, W.; Filippenko, A. V.; Foley, R. J.; Kirshner, R. P.;
    Modjaz, M.; Bloom, J.; Brown, P. J.; Carter, D.; Friedman, A. S.; Gal-Yam,
    A.; Ganeshalingam, M.; Hicken, M.; Krisciunas, K.; Milne, P.; Silverman,
    J. M.; Suntzeff, N. B.; Wood-Vasey, W. M.; Cenko, S. B.; Challis, P.; Fox,
    D. B.; Kirkman, D.; Li, J. Z.; Li, T. P.; Malkan, M. A.; Moore, M. R.;
    Reitzel, D. B.; Rich, R. M.; Serduke, F. J. D.; Shang, R. C.; Steele, T.
    N.; Swift, B. J.; Tao, C.; Wong, D. S.; Zhang, S. N.

    For the generation of Type Ia supernova thermonuclear explosion explanations have been proposed, none of them have withstood modern testing.
    http://www.astrophysicsspectator.com...hermonuclear.h
    tml
    Thus the formation of a transnsition towards de Sitter space may be considereed as a viable alternative
    explanatory framework. Before we take the imprudent action of testing additional energies at CERN or yet again at the Fermi Nationional Acclerator Laboratory in Batavia, Illinois, more theoretical research should be employed to verify the safety of this research in highest-energy physics or all is lost.

    An educational presentation may be provided also:
    https://laulima.hawaii.edu/access/co...1010/Education
    Paul W. Dixon is responsible for this presentation, Copyright 2009 Paul W. Dixon.

    Consider the parameters for universe formation as being similar
    to that for Type Ia Supernova generation as being very small and
    vastly energetic. This may be philosophically difficult to comprehend
    yet essentially vital for survival!

    The parameter space of inflationary cosmology is seen in the estimate of chaotic expansion theory of the universe beginning at ~10^-43 seconds after the Big Bang, point origin of the Universe with total duration of expansion of 10^-35 seconds or thereabouts. Here the region of expansion no bigger than 10^-33 cm yielding with simultaneous inflations to reach the observable size of our Universe at l<~10^28 cm .. (Andrei Linde, Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology, La Tex Harwood, Chur, Switzerland, 1990, p39) Andrei Linde is the leading authority in this important work at the Department of Physics at Stanford University.
    http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-th/pdf/0503/0503203v1.pdf

    Should we consider the hypothesis of the uniformity of nature as predictive of the abundance of living forms with some of them attaining the capacity to
    transfer themselves to our location in the universe, what can account for their absence? We may note in this connection that there is only a short delay before a transition towards de Sitter space at CERN, Fermilab or other high-energy physics experimentation has generated a Type Ia Supernova as demonstrated in this thread. The frequency of Type Ia Supernova in the observable universe would then signal the termination of these technically advanced civilizations. A technical experimental mischance may then occur before the members of the respective civilizations are philosophically ready to accept this possibllity.

    The approach of the transition towards de Sitter space at Fermilab
    with the ongoing increase in luminoisty is seen:
    http://www.fnal.gov/pub/now/tevlum.html
    with these energies are now equivalent to those found at the point
    origin of the universe. i..e. "The Big Bang."

    We need to consider the increased evidence of water on Mars and the possibilty of water
    on other planetary bodies as the source of life as well as intelligent life thus supporting the hypothesis
    that other creatures much like ourselves can be a source of Type Ia Supernovae.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7919113.stm

    It is generally agreed that the the Large Hadron Collider will provide an
    empirical test for the formation of transition towards de Sitter space.
    The collisional energetcis are much greater that those tested in the
    Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Batavia Illinois.

    "The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is being built in a circular tunnel 27 km
    in circumference. The tunnel is buried around 50 to 175 m. underground. It
    straddles the Swiss and French borders on the outskirts of Geneva.

    The first beams were circulated successfully on 10th September 2008.
    ...fortunately on 19th September a serious fault developed damaging a
    number of superconducting magnets. The repair will require a long
    technical intervention which overlaps with the planned winter shutdown.
    The LHC beam will, therefore, not see beam again before September 2009.

    The LHC is designed to collide two counter rotating beams of protons or
    heavy ions. Proton-proton collisions are foreseen at an energy of 7 TeV
    per beam."

    The competing hypothesis which is considered even more objectionable than the transition towards de Sitter space is given in the False Vacuum solution to the Einstein de Sitter equations. Yet as can be seen in this formulation high-energy physics experimentation may serve as a trigger for this most untoward event.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_vacuum

    Please note in this regard that the transition towards de Sitter space is well-known in the cosmological literature. http://www.springerlink.com/content/p8377167602421t1/

    An affidavit regarding the contingency of a Type Ia Supernova has been submitted as part of the legal action to bring a moratorium against such an experimental mischance.
    http://dockets.justia.com/docket/cou...case_id-78717/
    Many thanks for the happy birthday wishes!!!

    With the additional energies available at the LHC in CERN, it may also be possible to test the competing hypothesis of forming a transition to the lower condition in the Einstein de Sitter Universe. Following the formation of this transition, our Universe would drain off into the lower energy condition. This should be of a lesser probabilty of occurence yet it is still considered as a possible outcome to this research.

    Please note: http://professordixon.blogspot.com

    The WORLD RECORD luminosity now employed at the accelerator (Please note:
    Accelerator Division Notification on the Fermilab Home Page) is 362.37 E30.
    In scientific notation, this 362.37 x 10 to the 30th power particle interactions. With a beam energy of 10 to the 11th power electron volts, we have then the energy of the current work at Fermilab set a 362.37 x 10 to the 41st power electron volts (362.37 E 41 eV). This is much greater than the largest energies seen on earth via cosmic ray interactions at 10 to the 19th power eV (E 19 eV). Without publicity regarding this most critical danger,
    a breach in the potential barrier may occur at any moment thus releasing
    the force of a supernova on our planet and solar system. We will thus have an intrusional event from de Sitter space in the Einstein de Sitter Universe
    as it is now termed. Your kind and generous action on behalf of all
    mankind is greatly needed at this critical juncture or all is lost and we
    shall all perish.

    Please note that the return flight of the Columbia shuttle was not halted because of the false belief that the the foam shards could not cause a life threatening defect in the aerodynamic properties of the shuttle.
    http://www.reuters.com/article/lates.../idUSN30568874

    As a fictional work, the novel Anathem remarks on scientists tinkering with what they do not understand. To quote from the journal Nature, "Anathem is a shrewd exploration of what might happen if the fear of scientists meddling with things they were never meant to know becomes entirely justified." with space-time itself included in the list of potential problem areas.
    (Jennifer Rahn, Imprisoned by intelligence, Neal Stephenson, Anathem, Opinion Nature, 456, 7221, 27 November 2008, 447-447)

    It may be noted in this connection that the term Anathem refers to an ecumenical curse of severe proportions. This may be understood to mean that we are expected to take extreme exception with predjudice to the work of those who would destroy us and our children through this meddling.

    Tycho Brahe's supernova, now identified as a Type Ia Supernova, shows those characteristics as predicted by the model expected in supernova from experimentation. A large Supernova has been generated leaving behind a type G star such as is found in our solar system. (Andrea Pastorello, Astrophysics, Echo from an ancient supernova, Nature 456, 7222, 4 December 2008, 587-589) The technique of light echoes was used for this identification of an historical object.

    As noted in Chang, J.,et al., An excess of cosmic ray electrons at energies of 300-800 GeV (Nature, 456, 7220, 20 November 2008, pp. 362-365) could be tapping into "muti-dimensional spaces with potenially important implications for our understanding of the Universe." Similarly, we may postulate that Type Ia supernovae are expressing the energetics of an n-dimensional space
    whose properties may be understood with further study.

    Please note that while the Type II Supernovae have origin in 10 or more solar mass objects Type Ia Supernovae have origin in objects of some 1 solar mass.
    It may be noted in this connection that the smaller massed Supernova give rise to deflagration of some 10 billion solar luminosities whilst the larger objects give rise to some 1 billion solar luminosity deflagration objects. This difference may lend support that the energetics of Type Ia Supernovae is created via an aperture formed towards de Sitter space. As also noted in this connection, there is no trace of hydrogen at maximum light for Type Ia Supernovae thus making it statistically unlikely that they have reached the Chandrssekhar limit by accretion from a nearby solar object.

    http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...ro/snovcn.html

    The formation of Type 1a Supernovae is dependent on them reaching the Chandrasekhar limit of greater than 1.4 solar mass to implode into a Supernova according to current theory.

    http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...ro/snovcn.html

    Yet there is evidence that the Type !a Supernova can form at one solar mass
    or less thus contradicting current theory and thus supporting the alternate theory where Type Ia Suoernovae may be formed via the formation of a transition towards de Sitter space.
    Probing Dark Energy with Supernovae
    by Sebastian Ihle
    9.6.2006

    As noted in our sciforums discussion, there are a number of competing hypotheses. An empirical investigation is under way at CERN in the LHC.
    Should we generate a Type Ia Supernova, this will confirm the existence of a
    highly energetic topologically cobordant continuum termed de Sitter space.
    So far, the astrophysical theoretical generalizations of the generalized theory of relativity have been confirmed at the 100% level. The world's largest experiment may yet create a tragic confirmatiion of Albert Einstein's theory.

    Please recall that the energies now proposed for the LHC at CERN will be some 7 times greater that those employed at FERMILAB. As is well-known, the energies in use at FERMILAB approximate those predicted for those found at the point origin of the Universe. Thus even from a Common Sense perspective we may penetrate the potential barrier towards de Sitter space
    thus releasing the force of Type Ia Supernova on our planet with the increaased energies to be employed at the LHC. Please note:

    Philosophy and Common Sense (Frances)

    "Not every philosophy professor takes philosophy seriously in the sense
    that she thinks that some purely philosophical theories that go against
    common sense have a good chance to be true. These philosophers respect
    anti-commonsensical theories, in that they admit such theories are very
    important in the pursuit of philosophical understanding. But they also
    think that there is no real chance that they are true. If you have a valid
    argument based not on scientific but purely philosophical reasoning, and
    that argument concludes with something against cross-cultural and timeless
    common sense, then at least one of the premises isnt true, or so they say.
    It might be tremendously difficult to identify the mistaken premise, but
    we can start our investigation off assuming that our assumption that the
    conclusion is false is safe. These philosophers take philosophising
    seriously, of course, but they dont take seriously the idea that purely
    philosophical (so not empirical, not mathematical) theories have a good
    chance at overthrowing parts of common sense."

    A videotaped presentation of this statement is under preparation. Link to this will be provided as soon as it is made ready. This should provide a more interesting source. We welcome any suggestions you may have in this connection for illustrative material. Please let us know what Malcolm Perry would indicate regarding the formation of a transition towards de Sitter space via highest-energy physics experimentation.

    Highest energy physics is an empirical science as noted below. We may then discover through experimentation the answer to our theoretical questions
    which are then derived from observation. Should the ongoing LHC at CERN produce the Higgs boson and field, this would then be a major victory for the Standatrard Model in Physics. Should we note the generation of a Type Ia Supernova, this will further confirm the current record of 100% successful predictions of the Generalized Theory of Relavity of Albert Einstein. These energies to be generated at CERN are those energy levels seen some 10^-9 - 10^-14 seconds subsequent to the point origin of the Universe. Experimentally we note that these energies are deemed sufficient for the testing of these hypotheses.

    Please access this webpage for a thorough update on the LHC at CERN.

    http://www.lhcdefense.org/

    Generation of Type Ia Supernova via a transition to de Sitter space may be added to this description as a consequence of highest energy physics experimentation.

    There has been a brief hiatus introduced from now until April or thereabouts for the reactivation of the LHC at CERN. We should consider all possible alternatives before this gravely irresponsible experiment begins anew.

    Please recall that the activation of the Large Hadron Collider at CERN is the onset of the largest highest-energy experiment so far extant on our planet.
    The empirical observation of a Type Ia Supernova will serve as another confirmation of the Generalized Theory of Albert Einstein. This theory, as noted below, has had 100% verifcation in other astrophysical observations.
    Let us not be so rash as to further test this theory and lose all that we hold most dear as a sacrifice to the ambitions of ruthless egoism and professional incompetence. We may discover the Higgs boson and field and yet create a perforation in the potential barrier towards de Sitter space and create a Supernova. The tentative date for the onset of the collisional actions at CERN is now around May 1, 2009.

    From the LHC Machine Outreach

    The LHC is designed to collide two counter rotating beams of protons or
    heavy ions. Proton-proton collisions are foreseen at an energy of 7 TeV
    per beam.

    The WORLD RECORD luminosity now employed per example at the US accelerator (Please note:
    Accelerator Division Notification on the Fermilab Home Page) is
    288.89E30.
    In scientific
    notation, this 288.89 x 10 to the 30th power particle interactions. With
    a beam energy of 10 to the 11th power electron volts, we have then the
    energy of the current work at Fermilab set a 288.89 x 10 to the 41st
    power
    electron volts (288.89 E 41 eV). This is much greater than the largest
    energies seen on earth via cosmic ray interactions at 10 to the 19th
    power eV (E 19 eV). Without publicity regarding this most critical danger,
    a breach in the potential barrier may occur at any moment thus releasing
    the force of a supernova on our planet and solar system. We will thus have an
    intrusional event from de Sitter space in the Einstein de Sitter Universe
    as it is now termed. Your kind and generous action on behalf of all
    mankind is greatly needed at this critical juncture or all is lost and we
    shall all perish as this undergoes a vast increment at CERN.

    As one of the seven plaintiffs in the District Court in Hawaii, may I offer a formal complaint agasinst Director of CERN Robert Aymar and to John Ellis chief theoretican of CERN to appear in the International Court in the Hague to answer charges of gross negligence in the operation of the Large Hadron Collider at CERN. As noted in this post, is the formal derivation of the generation of Type Ia Supernova from their experiment following the well-known work of Albert Einstein and his colleague Willem de Sitter in the generalized theory of relativity. The energies in nature do not approximate those found some 10^-9 to 10^-14 seconds subsequent to the Big Bang at the pont origin of the Universe without forming a transition towards de Sitter space as noted per exemplar in Type II supernovae and in quasars. Their willingness to proceed with this experiment with full knowledge of this potentiallity consititutes a criminal act of public endangerment. May we request that the good people of Switzerland discontinue power service to CERN until this matter has reached full legal disposition in the International Court in the Hague.

    May I add a personal note to this discussion. We should preserve the
    future for all mankind. Children have the right to grow-up in a safe and
    sheltered environment. We need to give our children the time to dream and
    grow into all future time. We should visit other planets, other stars, other
    galaxies to see and understand all things. Let us call for patience in
    this research endeavor until we are certain of the potential dangers that
    may lurk for the unsuspecting researcher. One Supernova will terminate all
    that we hold most dear.

    Update on the research progress at CERN.

    End of July: First particles may be injected, and the commissioning with
    beams and collisions will start.
    It is expected that it will take about 2 months to have first collisions
    at 10 TeV. Please note that only one area remains at below collisional
    energies.

    We shall now observe at CERN the onset of collisional energies at far
    greater impact than those observed at Fermilab.

    http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=...der-first-beam

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7512586.stm

    The Director General of CERN Robert Aymar as well as the safety officers
    of CERN have received the appended posting. We may hope that this message
    will alert them to the forthcoming generation of a Type Ia Supernova from
    the experimental highest-energy physics at CERN. So far, as the
    preparation for the LHC experiment continues, there has been no refutation
    of the theoretical work of Albert Einstein and the extension of his
    Generalized Theory of Relativity by Willem de Sitter. This forms the basis
    of our understanding of the Einstein de Sitter Universe as it is now
    termed. A review of the cosmological perspective is provided in the generation of Type Ia Supernova:
    http://professordixon.blogspot.com/


    Please note: Cool down at CERN is near completion as all segments are in
    the blue condition. Collisional energetics should now be observed shortly.
    May God have mercy on the souls of all our children.
    http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/

    As we are in engaged in an eschatological discourse, the "philosophy of
    last things," we need to distinguish between black hole generation as well
    as strangelets and Type Ia Supernova. Their generation and their effects
    are uncertain whilst Type Ia Supernova Generation is almost completely
    certain as are as any of the effects under the auspices of Albert
    Einstein's generalized theory of relativity. Please note: Dragging of
    Inertial Frames (Ignazio Ciufloni (2007) Nature 7158, 449, 41-53) Walter
    L. Wagner and I have discusssed this. Type Ia Supernova generation will be
    sudden and the destruction of our planet, our solar system and a host of
    nearby stars will follow. Should the CERN LHC (Large Hadron Collider) cool
    down schedule proceed as now planned, an empirical test of the hypothesis
    of Type Ia Supernova generation via highest energy physics experimentation
    will commence in June/July 2008. The 7 Tev phase of the research would
    then begin at this time. Please note: http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/
    cooldown progress in preparation of the empirical test of this hypotheisis
    at the LHC in CERN as noted above.

    Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
    by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)


    It may be helpful to clarify the philosophical position and astrophysical
    energetics instrinsic to de Sitter space in the standard cosmological
    model in this postulation of transition from de Sitter space as generative
    of supernova in high-energy physics experimentation.

    A philosophical position may be cited from, G. W. F. Hegel (The philosophy
    of history, New York: Dover, 249, 1956) ..." there is no essential
    existence which does not manifest itself." The very large energies derived
    by Willem de Sitter for the equations describing the false vacuum of de
    Sitter space yield an energy density of 1.69 x 10^126 for eV (electron
    volts) per cm^3. (Gott, R. (1982) Creation of open universes from de
    Sitter space, Nature, 295, 304-307. In Waldrop. M.M., (1982) Bubbles upon
    the river of time, Science, 215, 4536, 1082-1083), the energy density of
    de Sitter space is given as: 5 x 10^31 kelvin and 3 x 10^93 grams per cm^3
    , converted to eV via e=mc^2 which is Albert Einstein's famous equation.
    This energy would then find expression in the observable universe. In the
    sense of this analysis, it would be quite unlikely that energies of this
    order of magnitude would remain hidden should a transition be formed in
    the potential barrier towards de Sitter space. This would serve as an
    immediate and ever present danger for the investigator and constitutes a
    public endangerment as well.

    This is based on the mainstream theory of universe formation by Professor
    R. Gott of Princeton University in which each bubble universe forms
    smoothly out of de Sitter space. A potentially infinite number of
    universes may form in de Sitter space. In a topological sense, de Sitter
    space is cobordant at each point with the continuum (our universe). De
    Sitter space is then prevented by a large potential barrier from forming
    an intrusional event into the continuum. The essential hypothesis of this
    formulation is that with sufficiently great energetics, a classical breach
    in the potential barrier towards de Siitter space will be formed thus
    releasing the force of Type Ia supernova upon the terrestrial ecosphere,
    the solar system and those nearby stars. These energies are from de Sitter
    space, therefore; the energies of the accelerator only serve as a trigger
    for their release.

    With sufficient energies, under this postulation, we discover that the
    accelerator is in the Einstein de Sitter universe, as it is now termed,
    and we have gone from particle physics as our governing theory to
    relativistic cosmology.

    This supports of the theoretcal position that sufficient energy will penetrate the potential barrier towards de Sitter space thus releasing the force of an exploding Universe i.e., Supernova, on our planet. The works of Albert Einstein and Willem de Sitter as shown here have never been refuted.

    From the viewpoint of classical physics, the penetration towards de Sitter space is prevented by a large though not infinite potential barrier as described by Malcolm Perry. As the energies in the collliders go from 10^-9 seconds to 10^-14 seconds subsequent to the big bang at the point origin of the Universe, this penetrance becomes inevitable thus releasing the force of a Type Ia Supernova on our planet, solar system and host of nearby stars.

    All the children will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf.

    Yours sincerely,

    Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
    Supernova from Experimentation
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Lamont Cranston Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    137
    From CERN's web site. Collisions soon.

    News: 9 November 2009
    Particles have gone half way round the LHC

    Splash event recorded by the CMS experiment on 7 November. The electromagnetic calorimeter is in red, the hadronic calorimeter in blue, the muon system is yellow and magenta. The barrel muon detector was on standby and the inner tracking detector was off.

    On Saturday evening, at around 8 p.m., after passing through the LHCb detector, for the first time since last year's incident, protons arrived at the doorstep of the CMS experiment, thus completing half the journey around the LHC's circumference.

    Low energy protons from the LHC were dumped in a collimator just upstream of the CMS cavern. The calorimeters and the muon chambers of the experiment saw the tracks left by particles coming from the dumping point (a so-called 'splash event', see image). During the weekend, bunches of protons were also sent in the clockwise direction passing through the ALICE detector and were dumped at point 3.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Lamont Cranston Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    137
    Four proton / proton collisions recorded Monday..anyone know the energies?

    What's happened to Paul and the gang? It's a little quiet here..
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Raithere plagued by infinities Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,343
    He's busy rewriting his article. Just as he has to do every time his predictions fail.

    Either that or he got sucked into a bubble universe and we'll never hear from him again.

    ~Raithere
     
  8. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,535
    Um, no it isn't. Unless you're already predisposed toward the "there are things man is never meant to know Woooo!" type Frankenstein complex.

    It SHOULD be noted that the term Anathem ALSO means
    e.g. an non-religious "hymn" or "prayer" of thanks.
     
  9. mugaliens Registered Member

    Messages:
    110
    "Thus sufficiant energy from the Large Hadron Collider can
    penetrate the potential barier towards de Sitter space releasing the force
    of a Supernova."

    On a scale of a few atoms, by means of carbon fusion, yes.

    Big whoop. If I held that in my hand, it might damage a cell or two.
     
  10. Lamont Cranston Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    137

    I thought that the proton beams at full energy would be expected to vaporise metal in the beam dumps. That's more than damage to a few cells.

    And if you stood in the way of a proton beam at 7TeV, that would make one hell of a bullet hole.

    Correct me if I'm wrong..usually am

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  11. BobG Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    162
    The beam would have that effect but the individual particle energies are not that great. Each particle has roughly the energy of a mosquito but there are a great deal many particles.

    One person has survived after facing a beam head on but that was a fairly remarkable case and a much lower energy accelerator.

    See here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anatoli_Bugorski
     
  12. Walter L. Wagner Cosmic Truth Seeker Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,520
    We have used protons beams in medicine for decades to deliver site specific radiation exposures for ablation purposes. One of the salient features is that the proton beam is accelerated in a vacuum, but then exits into air (so the patient can breathe, etc.). Apparently, the accident referenced above by BobG involved a similar type of exposure. At the LHC, etc., the proton beams would be entirely in vacuum, including at the Beam Dump, and there would be no possibility for a human to be present in front of such a beam. If there is no vacuum, then there is no beam. Only if there is an errant beam that burns a hole through the vacuum containment could a person be exposed - - but there are operational controls in place to preclude people from being present in those regions during operation.
     
  13. Paul W. Dixon Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    505
    SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT CERN AND FERMILAB

    The energy intensity at CERN is now testing the hypothesis that we are now at the threshold of breaching the potential barrier towards de Sitter space. Much greater increments in energy are anticpated at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN.

    "On the evening of Tuesday, 8 December, two bunches per beam circulated for the first time at 1.18 TeV for a short period and ATLAS recorded its first collisions at the record energy of 2.36 TeV (centre of mass)."

    Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
    by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)

    One of the mathematical understandings in modern cosmology is that
    De Sitter space is topologically covariant with the continuum at every
    point. Thus sufficiant energy from the Large Hadron Collider can
    penetrate the potential barier towards de Sitter space releasing the force
    of a Supernova. We are most deeply indebted to you for your kind
    interest and understanding in this matter

    We note also: in the CERN news bulletin
    "For the first time also, lead ions have arrived at the doorstep of the
    LHC." ESSAY , The Collider, The Particle and a Theory about Fate
    (The New York Times, Dennis Overbye) It may be anticipated that we can
    reset the cosmic timetable for our planet and a host of nearby stars back to the
    interstellar medium.

    A notice from the LHC administration for your interest. Please take what what action you deem
    necessary in this connection. All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf.

    "The Latest from the LHC: Towards the big chill
    With 6 sectors out of 8 at nominal cryogenic temperature (1.9 K= about
    -271 C), the commissioning at the LHC is progressing well. According to
    the present schedule, the whole machine will be cold in about two weeks.

    Final operations to fill the nitrogen tanks for cooling the last sector to
    80K.
    Only Sectors 3-4 and 6-7 are still in the cooling phase (currently between
    60 and 20 K). As already mentioned in the previous update, as soon as a
    sector reaches the nominal cryogenic temperature, teams can start powering
    the magnets. At present, the current is flowing in the magnets of three
    sectors, while the remaining three will be powered in the coming two
    weeks."

    It may be intuitively more comprehensible to perceive the influx of energy as an electrical discharge since it would be the penetration of a potential barrier towards de Sitter space which releases the force of a Type Ia Supernova.

    As cited in the astrophysical literature, the energies resident in de Sitter space are vast enough to provide for the energies in a Type Ia Supernova.
    Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
    by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)

    It may be helpful to clarify the philosophical position and astrophysical
    energetics instrinsic to de Sitter space in the standard cosmological
    model in this postulation of transition from de Sitter space as generative
    of supernova in high-energy physics experimentation.

    A philosophical position may be cited from, G. W. F. Hegel (The philosophy
    of history, New York: Dover, 249, 1956) ..." there is no essential
    existence which does not manifest itself." The very large energies derived
    by Willem de Sitter for the equations describing the false vacuum of de
    Sitter space yield an energy density of 1.69 x 10^126 for eV (electron
    volts) per cm^3. (Gott, R. (1982) Creation of open universes from de
    Sitter space, Nature, 295, 304-307. In Waldrop. M.M., (1982) Bubbles upon
    the river of time, Science, 215, 4536, 1082-1083), the energy density of
    de Sitter space is given as: 5 x 10^31 kelvin and 3 x 10^93 grams per cm^3
    , converted to eV via e=mc^2 which is Albert Einstein's famous equation.
    This energy would then find expression in the observable universe. In the
    sense of this analysis, it would be quite unlikely that energies of this
    order of magnitude would remain hidden should a transition be formed in
    the potential barrier towards de Sitter space. This would serve as an
    immediate and ever present danger for the investigator and constitutes a
    public endangerment as well.

    This is based on the mainstream theory of universe formation by Professor
    R. Gott of Princeton University in which each bubble universe forms
    smoothly out of de Sitter space. A potentially infinite number of
    universes may form in de Sitter space. In a topological sense, de Sitter
    space is cobordant at each point with the continuum (our universe). De
    Sitter space is then prevented by a large potential barrier from forming
    an intrusional event into the continuum. The essential hypothesis of this
    formulation is that with sufficiently great energetics, a classical breach
    in the potential barrier towards de Siitter space will be formed thus
    releasing the force of Type Ia supernova upon the terrestrial ecosphere,
    the solar system and those nearby stars. These energies are from de Sitter
    space, therefore; the energies of the accelerator only serve as a trigger
    for their release.

    With sufficient energies, under this postulation, we discover that the
    accelerator is in the Einstein de Sitter universe, as it is now termed,
    and we have gone from particle physics as our governing theory to
    relativistic cosmology.

    Statistically speaking, Type Ia Supernovae are distinguished by having
    much greater luminosity at point of maximum light and they are of around
    1.40 solar masses or less and also show no presence of hydrogen at maximum
    light as well. Should this be caused via a transition towards de Sitter
    space then there should be no alteration of hydrogen towards calcium or
    other elements in deflagration of Supernova Type Ia. Other types of
    supernovae of I Types show presence of helium at time of maximum light.
    Should there be exemplars of greater mass levels for Type Ia supernovae
    this would again illustrate the artifical nature, e.g., high-energy
    physics experimentation generation of a transition towards de Sitter
    space. This indicates that CERN as an experimental configuration should generate a Type Ia Supernova thus supporting the work of Albert Einstein and the generalization of the Generalized Theory of Relativity
    by Willem de Sitter.

    http://www.google.com/search?pz=1&ne...tnmeta=searc
    h%3Dsearch=Search+the+Web

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_Ia_supernova

    http://www.space.com/scienceastronom..._atypical.html

    Please note there is now a limited time frame to bring this supernova generation to the attention of the director of CERN
    where the time of onset is now this November, 2009. May we offer our services to offer to present or debate the forthcoming destruction of our planet, our solar system and a host nearby stars via the generation of a Type Ia Supernova. Please contact at: dixon at hawaii.edu

    http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/

    Where there is no evidence of either helium or hydrogen at maximum light for Type Ia supernova this would further support the hypothesis of a transition towards de Sitter space. This is evidence of a statistical nature.

    http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1996PASJ...48...51S
    Title: Type-Ia Supernova SN 1995D in NGC 2962: Optical V, R, and I Band
    Photometry and Spectra, Sadakane, K., Yokoo, T., Arimoto, J.-I., Matsumoto, K., Honda, S., Tanabe, K., ,
    Journal: Publ. of the Astronomical Society of Japan, v.48, p.51-57.
    Bibliographic Code: 1996PASJ...48...51S

    It may be noted in this connection that there is no trace of hydrogen at maximum light for Supernovae Type Ia, which indicates that the companion star for this model is statistically unlikely since most stars are are of an hydrogen dominant order. This observation supports the the origin of these supernovae via a transtion towards de Sitter space or other highly energetic flux. Please note:

    The Golden Standard Type Ia Supernova 2005cf: Observations from the
    Ultraviolet to the Near-Infrared Wavebands
    Wang, X.; Li, W.; Filippenko, A. V.; Foley, R. J.; Kirshner, R. P.;
    Modjaz, M.; Bloom, J.; Brown, P. J.; Carter, D.; Friedman, A. S.; Gal-Yam,
    A.; Ganeshalingam, M.; Hicken, M.; Krisciunas, K.; Milne, P.; Silverman,
    J. M.; Suntzeff, N. B.; Wood-Vasey, W. M.; Cenko, S. B.; Challis, P.; Fox,
    D. B.; Kirkman, D.; Li, J. Z.; Li, T. P.; Malkan, M. A.; Moore, M. R.;
    Reitzel, D. B.; Rich, R. M.; Serduke, F. J. D.; Shang, R. C.; Steele, T.
    N.; Swift, B. J.; Tao, C.; Wong, D. S.; Zhang, S. N.

    For the generation of Type Ia supernova thermonuclear explosion explanations have been proposed, none of them have withstood modern testing.
    http://www.astrophysicsspectator.com...hermonuclear.h
    tml
    Thus the formation of a transnsition towards de Sitter space may be considereed as a viable alternative
    explanatory framework. Before we take the imprudent action of testing additional energies at CERN or yet again at the Fermi Nationional Acclerator Laboratory in Batavia, Illinois, more theoretical research should be employed to verify the safety of this research in highest-energy physics or all is lost.

    An educational presentation may be provided also:
    https://laulima.hawaii.edu/access/co...1010/Education
    Paul W. Dixon is responsible for this presentation, Copyright 2009 Paul W. Dixon.

    Consider the parameters for universe formation as being similar
    to that for Type Ia Supernova generation as being very small and
    vastly energetic. This may be philosophically difficult to comprehend
    yet essentially vital for survival!

    The parameter space of inflationary cosmology is seen in the estimate of chaotic expansion theory of the universe beginning at ~10^-43 seconds after the Big Bang, point origin of the Universe with total duration of expansion of 10^-35 seconds or thereabouts. Here the region of expansion no bigger than 10^-33 cm yielding with simultaneous inflations to reach the observable size of our Universe at l<~10^28 cm .. (Andrei Linde, Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology, La Tex Harwood, Chur, Switzerland, 1990, p39) Andrei Linde is the leading authority in this important work at the Department of Physics at Stanford University.
    http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-th/pdf/0503/0503203v1.pdf

    Should we consider the hypothesis of the uniformity of nature as predictive of the abundance of living forms with some of them attaining the capacity to
    transfer themselves to our location in the universe, what can account for their absence? We may note in this connection that there is only a short delay before a transition towards de Sitter space at CERN, Fermilab or other high-energy physics experimentation has generated a Type Ia Supernova as demonstrated in this thread. The frequency of Type Ia Supernova in the observable universe would then signal the termination of these technically advanced civilizations. A technical experimental mischance may then occur before the members of the respective civilizations are philosophically ready to accept this possibllity.

    The approach of the transition towards de Sitter space at Fermilab
    with the ongoing increase in luminoisty is seen:
    http://www.fnal.gov/pub/now/tevlum.html
    with these energies are now equivalent to those found at the point
    origin of the universe. i..e. "The Big Bang."

    We need to consider the increased evidence of water on Mars and the possibilty of water
    on other planetary bodies as the source of life as well as intelligent life thus supporting the hypothesis
    that other creatures much like ourselves can be a source of Type Ia Supernovae.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7919113.stm

    It is generally agreed that the the Large Hadron Collider will provide an
    empirical test for the formation of transition towards de Sitter space.
    The collisional energetcis are much greater that those tested in the
    Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Batavia Illinois.

    "The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is being built in a circular tunnel 27 km
    in circumference. The tunnel is buried around 50 to 175 m. underground. It
    straddles the Swiss and French borders on the outskirts of Geneva.

    The first beams were circulated successfully on 10th September 2008.
    ...fortunately on 19th September a serious fault developed damaging a
    number of superconducting magnets. The repair will require a long
    technical intervention which overlaps with the planned winter shutdown.
    The LHC beam will, therefore, not see beam again before September 2009.

    The LHC is designed to collide two counter rotating beams of protons or
    heavy ions. Proton-proton collisions are foreseen at an energy of 7 TeV
    per beam."

    The competing hypothesis which is considered even more objectionable than the transition towards de Sitter space is given in the False Vacuum solution to the Einstein de Sitter equations. Yet as can be seen in this formulation high-energy physics experimentation may serve as a trigger for this most untoward event.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_vacuum

    Please note in this regard that the transition towards de Sitter space is well-known in the cosmological literature. http://www.springerlink.com/content/p8377167602421t1/

    An affidavit regarding the contingency of a Type Ia Supernova has been submitted as part of the legal action to bring a moratorium against such an experimental mischance.
    http://dockets.justia.com/docket/cou...case_id-78717/
    Many thanks for the happy birthday wishes!!!

    With the additional energies available at the LHC in CERN, it may also be possible to test the competing hypothesis of forming a transition to the lower condition in the Einstein de Sitter Universe. Following the formation of this transition, our Universe would drain off into the lower energy condition. This should be of a lesser probabilty of occurence yet it is still considered as a possible outcome to this research.

    Please note: http://professordixon.blogspot.com

    The WORLD RECORD luminosity now employed at the accelerator (Please note:
    Accelerator Division Notification on the Fermilab Home Page) is 362.37 E30.
    In scientific notation, this 362.37 x 10 to the 30th power particle interactions. With a beam energy of 10 to the 11th power electron volts, we have then the energy of the current work at Fermilab set a 362.37 x 10 to the 41st power electron volts (362.37 E 41 eV). This is much greater than the largest energies seen on earth via cosmic ray interactions at 10 to the 19th power eV (E 19 eV). Without publicity regarding this most critical danger,
    a breach in the potential barrier may occur at any moment thus releasing
    the force of a supernova on our planet and solar system. We will thus have an intrusional event from de Sitter space in the Einstein de Sitter Universe
    as it is now termed. Your kind and generous action on behalf of all
    mankind is greatly needed at this critical juncture or all is lost and we
    shall all perish.

    Please note that the return flight of the Columbia shuttle was not halted because of the false belief that the the foam shards could not cause a life threatening defect in the aerodynamic properties of the shuttle.
    http://www.reuters.com/article/lates.../idUSN30568874

    As a fictional work, the novel Anathem remarks on scientists tinkering with what they do not understand. To quote from the journal Nature, "Anathem is a shrewd exploration of what might happen if the fear of scientists meddling with things they were never meant to know becomes entirely justified." with space-time itself included in the list of potential problem areas.
    (Jennifer Rahn, Imprisoned by intelligence, Neal Stephenson, Anathem, Opinion Nature, 456, 7221, 27 November 2008, 447-447)

    It may be noted in this connection that the term Anathem refers to an ecumenical curse of severe proportions. This may be understood to mean that we are expected to take extreme exception with predjudice to the work of those who would destroy us and our children through this meddling.

    Tycho Brahe's supernova, now identified as a Type Ia Supernova, shows those characteristics as predicted by the model expected in supernova from experimentation. A large Supernova has been generated leaving behind a type G star such as is found in our solar system. (Andrea Pastorello, Astrophysics, Echo from an ancient supernova, Nature 456, 7222, 4 December 2008, 587-589) The technique of light echoes was used for this identification of an historical object.

    As noted in Chang, J.,et al., An excess of cosmic ray electrons at energies of 300-800 GeV (Nature, 456, 7220, 20 November 2008, pp. 362-365) could be tapping into "muti-dimensional spaces with potenially important implications for our understanding of the Universe." Similarly, we may postulate that Type Ia supernovae are expressing the energetics of an n-dimensional space
    whose properties may be understood with further study.

    Please note that while the Type II Supernovae have origin in 10 or more solar mass objects Type Ia Supernovae have origin in objects of some 1 solar mass.
    It may be noted in this connection that the smaller massed Supernova give rise to deflagration of some 10 billion solar luminosities whilst the larger objects give rise to some 1 billion solar luminosity deflagration objects. This difference may lend support that the energetics of Type Ia Supernovae is created via an aperture formed towards de Sitter space. As also noted in this connection, there is no trace of hydrogen at maximum light for Type Ia Supernovae thus making it statistically unlikely that they have reached the Chandrssekhar limit by accretion from a nearby solar object.

    http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...ro/snovcn.html

    The formation of Type 1a Supernovae is dependent on them reaching the Chandrasekhar limit of greater than 1.4 solar mass to implode into a Supernova according to current theory.

    http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...ro/snovcn.html

    Yet there is evidence that the Type !a Supernova can form at one solar mass
    or less thus contradicting current theory and thus supporting the alternate theory where Type Ia Suoernovae may be formed via the formation of a transition towards de Sitter space.
    Probing Dark Energy with Supernovae
    by Sebastian Ihle
    9.6.2006

    As noted in our sciforums discussion, there are a number of competing hypotheses. An empirical investigation is under way at CERN in the LHC.
    Should we generate a Type Ia Supernova, this will confirm the existence of a
    highly energetic topologically cobordant continuum termed de Sitter space.
    So far, the astrophysical theoretical generalizations of the generalized theory of relativity have been confirmed at the 100% level. The world's largest experiment may yet create a tragic confirmatiion of Albert Einstein's theory.

    Please recall that the energies now proposed for the LHC at CERN will be some 7 times greater that those employed at FERMILAB. As is well-known, the energies in use at FERMILAB approximate those predicted for those found at the point origin of the Universe. Thus even from a Common Sense perspective we may penetrate the potential barrier towards de Sitter space
    thus releasing the force of Type Ia Supernova on our planet with the increaased energies to be employed at the LHC. Please note:

    Philosophy and Common Sense (Frances)

    "Not every philosophy professor takes philosophy seriously in the sense
    that she thinks that some purely philosophical theories that go against
    common sense have a good chance to be true. These philosophers respect
    anti-commonsensical theories, in that they admit such theories are very
    important in the pursuit of philosophical understanding. But they also
    think that there is no real chance that they are true. If you have a valid
    argument based not on scientific but purely philosophical reasoning, and
    that argument concludes with something against cross-cultural and timeless
    common sense, then at least one of the premises isnt true, or so they say.
    It might be tremendously difficult to identify the mistaken premise, but
    we can start our investigation off assuming that our assumption that the
    conclusion is false is safe. These philosophers take philosophising
    seriously, of course, but they dont take seriously the idea that purely
    philosophical (so not empirical, not mathematical) theories have a good
    chance at overthrowing parts of common sense."

    A videotaped presentation of this statement is under preparation. Link to this will be provided as soon as it is made ready. This should provide a more interesting source. We welcome any suggestions you may have in this connection for illustrative material. Please let us know what Malcolm Perry would indicate regarding the formation of a transition towards de Sitter space via highest-energy physics experimentation.

    Highest energy physics is an empirical science as noted below. We may then discover through experimentation the answer to our theoretical questions
    which are then derived from observation. Should the ongoing LHC at CERN produce the Higgs boson and field, this would then be a major victory for the Standatrard Model in Physics. Should we note the generation of a Type Ia Supernova, this will further confirm the current record of 100% successful predictions of the Generalized Theory of Relavity of Albert Einstein. These energies to be generated at CERN are those energy levels seen some 10^-9 - 10^-14 seconds subsequent to the point origin of the Universe. Experimentally we note that these energies are deemed sufficient for the testing of these hypotheses.

    Please access this webpage for a thorough update on the LHC at CERN.

    http://www.lhcdefense.org/

    Generation of Type Ia Supernova via a transition to de Sitter space may be added to this description as a consequence of highest energy physics experimentation.

    There has been a brief hiatus introduced from now until April or thereabouts for the reactivation of the LHC at CERN. We should consider all possible alternatives before this gravely irresponsible experiment begins anew.

    Please recall that the activation of the Large Hadron Collider at CERN is the onset of the largest highest-energy experiment so far extant on our planet.
    The empirical observation of a Type Ia Supernova will serve as another confirmation of the Generalized Theory of Albert Einstein. This theory, as noted below, has had 100% verifcation in other astrophysical observations.
    Let us not be so rash as to further test this theory and lose all that we hold most dear as a sacrifice to the ambitions of ruthless egoism and professional incompetence. We may discover the Higgs boson and field and yet create a perforation in the potential barrier towards de Sitter space and create a Supernova. The tentative date for the onset of the collisional actions at CERN is now around May 1, 2009.

    From the LHC Machine Outreach

    The LHC is designed to collide two counter rotating beams of protons or
    heavy ions. Proton-proton collisions are foreseen at an energy of 7 TeV
    per beam.

    The WORLD RECORD luminosity now employed per example at the US accelerator (Please note:
    Accelerator Division Notification on the Fermilab Home Page) is
    288.89E30.
    In scientific
    notation, this 288.89 x 10 to the 30th power particle interactions. With
    a beam energy of 10 to the 11th power electron volts, we have then the
    energy of the current work at Fermilab set a 288.89 x 10 to the 41st
    power
    electron volts (288.89 E 41 eV). This is much greater than the largest
    energies seen on earth via cosmic ray interactions at 10 to the 19th
    power eV (E 19 eV). Without publicity regarding this most critical danger,
    a breach in the potential barrier may occur at any moment thus releasing
    the force of a supernova on our planet and solar system. We will thus have an
    intrusional event from de Sitter space in the Einstein de Sitter Universe
    as it is now termed. Your kind and generous action on behalf of all
    mankind is greatly needed at this critical juncture or all is lost and we
    shall all perish as this undergoes a vast increment at CERN.

    As one of the seven plaintiffs in the District Court in Hawaii, may I offer a formal complaint agasinst Director of CERN Robert Aymar and to John Ellis chief theoretican of CERN to appear in the International Court in the Hague to answer charges of gross negligence in the operation of the Large Hadron Collider at CERN. As noted in this post, is the formal derivation of the generation of Type Ia Supernova from their experiment following the well-known work of Albert Einstein and his colleague Willem de Sitter in the generalized theory of relativity. The energies in nature do not approximate those found some 10^-9 to 10^-14 seconds subsequent to the Big Bang at the pont origin of the Universe without forming a transition towards de Sitter space as noted per exemplar in Type II supernovae and in quasars. Their willingness to proceed with this experiment with full knowledge of this potentiallity consititutes a criminal act of public endangerment. May we request that the good people of Switzerland discontinue power service to CERN until this matter has reached full legal disposition in the International Court in the Hague.

    May I add a personal note to this discussion. We should preserve the
    future for all mankind. Children have the right to grow-up in a safe and
    sheltered environment. We need to give our children the time to dream and
    grow into all future time. We should visit other planets, other stars, other
    galaxies to see and understand all things. Let us call for patience in
    this research endeavor until we are certain of the potential dangers that
    may lurk for the unsuspecting researcher. One Supernova will terminate all
    that we hold most dear.

    Update on the research progress at CERN.

    End of July: First particles may be injected, and the commissioning with
    beams and collisions will start.
    It is expected that it will take about 2 months to have first collisions
    at 10 TeV. Please note that only one area remains at below collisional
    energies.

    We shall now observe at CERN the onset of collisional energies at far
    greater impact than those observed at Fermilab.

    http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=...der-first-beam

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7512586.stm

    The Director General of CERN Robert Aymar as well as the safety officers
    of CERN have received the appended posting. We may hope that this message
    will alert them to the forthcoming generation of a Type Ia Supernova from
    the experimental highest-energy physics at CERN. So far, as the
    preparation for the LHC experiment continues, there has been no refutation
    of the theoretical work of Albert Einstein and the extension of his
    Generalized Theory of Relativity by Willem de Sitter. This forms the basis
    of our understanding of the Einstein de Sitter Universe as it is now
    termed. A review of the cosmological perspective is provided in the generation of Type Ia Supernova:
    http://professordixon.blogspot.com/


    Please note: Cool down at CERN is near completion as all segments are in
    the blue condition. Collisional energetics should now be observed shortly.
    May God have mercy on the souls of all our children.
    http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/

    As we are in engaged in an eschatological discourse, the "philosophy of
    last things," we need to distinguish between black hole generation as well
    as strangelets and Type Ia Supernova. Their generation and their effects
    are uncertain whilst Type Ia Supernova Generation is almost completely
    certain as are as any of the effects under the auspices of Albert
    Einstein's generalized theory of relativity. Please note: Dragging of
    Inertial Frames (Ignazio Ciufloni (2007) Nature 7158, 449, 41-53) Walter
    L. Wagner and I have discusssed this. Type Ia Supernova generation will be
    sudden and the destruction of our planet, our solar system and a host of
    nearby stars will follow. Should the CERN LHC (Large Hadron Collider) cool
    down schedule proceed as now planned, an empirical test of the hypothesis
    of Type Ia Supernova generation via highest energy physics experimentation
    will commence in June/July 2008. The 7 Tev phase of the research would
    then begin at this time. Please note: http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/
    cooldown progress in preparation of the empirical test of this hypotheisis
    at the LHC in CERN as noted above.

    Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
    by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)


    It may be helpful to clarify the philosophical position and astrophysical
    energetics instrinsic to de Sitter space in the standard cosmological
    model in this postulation of transition from de Sitter space as generative
    of supernova in high-energy physics experimentation.

    A philosophical position may be cited from, G. W. F. Hegel (The philosophy
    of history, New York: Dover, 249, 1956) ..." there is no essential
    existence which does not manifest itself." The very large energies derived
    by Willem de Sitter for the equations describing the false vacuum of de
    Sitter space yield an energy density of 1.69 x 10^126 for eV (electron
    volts) per cm^3. (Gott, R. (1982) Creation of open universes from de
    Sitter space, Nature, 295, 304-307. In Waldrop. M.M., (1982) Bubbles upon
    the river of time, Science, 215, 4536, 1082-1083), the energy density of
    de Sitter space is given as: 5 x 10^31 kelvin and 3 x 10^93 grams per cm^3
    , converted to eV via e=mc^2 which is Albert Einstein's famous equation.
    This energy would then find expression in the observable universe. In the
    sense of this analysis, it would be quite unlikely that energies of this
    order of magnitude would remain hidden should a transition be formed in
    the potential barrier towards de Sitter space. This would serve as an
    immediate and ever present danger for the investigator and constitutes a
    public endangerment as well.

    This is based on the mainstream theory of universe formation by Professor
    R. Gott of Princeton University in which each bubble universe forms
    smoothly out of de Sitter space. A potentially infinite number of
    universes may form in de Sitter space. In a topological sense, de Sitter
    space is cobordant at each point with the continuum (our universe). De
    Sitter space is then prevented by a large potential barrier from forming
    an intrusional event into the continuum. The essential hypothesis of this
    formulation is that with sufficiently great energetics, a classical breach
    in the potential barrier towards de Siitter space will be formed thus
    releasing the force of Type Ia supernova upon the terrestrial ecosphere,
    the solar system and those nearby stars. These energies are from de Sitter
    space, therefore; the energies of the accelerator only serve as a trigger
    for their release.

    With sufficient energies, under this postulation, we discover that the
    accelerator is in the Einstein de Sitter universe, as it is now termed,
    and we have gone from particle physics as our governing theory to
    relativistic cosmology.

    This supports of the theoretcal position that sufficient energy will penetrate the potential barrier towards de Sitter space thus releasing the force of an exploding Universe i.e., Supernova, on our planet. The works of Albert Einstein and Willem de Sitter as shown here have never been refuted.

    From the viewpoint of classical physics, the penetration towards de Sitter space is prevented by a large though not infinite potential barrier as described by Malcolm Perry. As the energies in the collliders go from 10^-9 seconds to 10^-14 seconds subsequent to the big bang at the point origin of the Universe, this penetrance becomes inevitable thus releasing the force of a Type Ia Supernova on our planet, solar system and host of nearby stars.

    All the children will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf.

    Yours sincerely,

    Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
    Supernova from Experimentation
     
    Last edited: Dec 12, 2009
  14. Billy T Use Sugar Cane Alcohol car Fuel Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,198
    Thanks for this news flash. I was begining to wonder if I was still alive.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Please tell me when we are all just part of hot expanding Type Ia Supernovae gases.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  15. ElectricFetus Sanity going, going, gone Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,140
    We are, we are just dreaming we are still alive, eventual a fragment of the earth will fall on some other inhabited planets and our ghosts will crawl around killing the local people and wild life in the quest for souls to feed are narcotic desired to forget we are dead.
     
  16. Lamont Cranston Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    137
    At what energies would one expect a type 1a Supernova to be caused (Dixon model), and at what energies would black holes and strangelets be expected to form (Wagner model)?

    Surely these are the key questions for the moment.
     
  17. prometheus viva voce! Moderator

    Messages:
    2,045
    Please don't legitimise this hogwash by calling it a model. Have a read of the wiki page on type Ia supernova if you're interested.

    Type Ia is a type of event that releases about the same amount of energy (about \(10^{44}\) Joules) each time and so can be used as standard candles to measure distances.
     
  18. Paul W. Dixon Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    505
    SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT CERN AND FERMILAB

    We have received approximately a month's reprieve thanks to the excellent judgement of the great people of Switzerland. Where quantum tunnelling may occur to an exploding universe so through this same potential barrier which permits quantum tunnelling a breach in the potential barrier towards de
    Sitter space will initiate a Supernova. There is only one Supernova per civilization and all is lost.
    Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
    by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)

    The energy intensity at CERN is now testing the hypothesis that we are now at the threshold of breaching the potential barrier towards de Sitter space. Much greater increments in energy are anticpated at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN.

    "On the evening of Tuesday, 8 December, two bunches per beam circulated for the first time at 1.18 TeV for a short period and ATLAS recorded its first collisions at the record energy of 2.36 TeV (centre of mass)."

    Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
    by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)

    One of the mathematical understandings in modern cosmology is that
    De Sitter space is topologically covariant with the continuum at every
    point. Thus sufficiant energy from the Large Hadron Collider can
    penetrate the potential barier towards de Sitter space releasing the force
    of a Supernova. We are most deeply indebted to you for your kind
    interest and understanding in this matter

    We note also: in the CERN news bulletin
    "For the first time also, lead ions have arrived at the doorstep of the
    LHC." ESSAY , The Collider, The Particle and a Theory about Fate
    (The New York Times, Dennis Overbye) It may be anticipated that we can
    reset the cosmic timetable for our planet and a host of nearby stars back to the
    interstellar medium.

    A notice from the LHC administration for your interest. Please take what what action you deem
    necessary in this connection. All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf.

    "The Latest from the LHC: Towards the big chill
    With 6 sectors out of 8 at nominal cryogenic temperature (1.9 K= about
    -271 C), the commissioning at the LHC is progressing well. According to
    the present schedule, the whole machine will be cold in about two weeks.

    Final operations to fill the nitrogen tanks for cooling the last sector to
    80K.
    Only Sectors 3-4 and 6-7 are still in the cooling phase (currently between
    60 and 20 K). As already mentioned in the previous update, as soon as a
    sector reaches the nominal cryogenic temperature, teams can start powering
    the magnets. At present, the current is flowing in the magnets of three
    sectors, while the remaining three will be powered in the coming two
    weeks."

    It may be intuitively more comprehensible to perceive the influx of energy as an electrical discharge since it would be the penetration of a potential barrier towards de Sitter space which releases the force of a Type Ia Supernova.

    As cited in the astrophysical literature, the energies resident in de Sitter space are vast enough to provide for the energies in a Type Ia Supernova.
    Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
    by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)

    It may be helpful to clarify the philosophical position and astrophysical
    energetics instrinsic to de Sitter space in the standard cosmological
    model in this postulation of transition from de Sitter space as generative
    of supernova in high-energy physics experimentation.

    A philosophical position may be cited from, G. W. F. Hegel (The philosophy
    of history, New York: Dover, 249, 1956) ..." there is no essential
    existence which does not manifest itself." The very large energies derived
    by Willem de Sitter for the equations describing the false vacuum of de
    Sitter space yield an energy density of 1.69 x 10^126 for eV (electron
    volts) per cm^3. (Gott, R. (1982) Creation of open universes from de
    Sitter space, Nature, 295, 304-307. In Waldrop. M.M., (1982) Bubbles upon
    the river of time, Science, 215, 4536, 1082-1083), the energy density of
    de Sitter space is given as: 5 x 10^31 kelvin and 3 x 10^93 grams per cm^3
    , converted to eV via e=mc^2 which is Albert Einstein's famous equation.
    This energy would then find expression in the observable universe. In the
    sense of this analysis, it would be quite unlikely that energies of this
    order of magnitude would remain hidden should a transition be formed in
    the potential barrier towards de Sitter space. This would serve as an
    immediate and ever present danger for the investigator and constitutes a
    public endangerment as well.

    This is based on the mainstream theory of universe formation by Professor
    R. Gott of Princeton University in which each bubble universe forms
    smoothly out of de Sitter space. A potentially infinite number of
    universes may form in de Sitter space. In a topological sense, de Sitter
    space is cobordant at each point with the continuum (our universe). De
    Sitter space is then prevented by a large potential barrier from forming
    an intrusional event into the continuum. The essential hypothesis of this
    formulation is that with sufficiently great energetics, a classical breach
    in the potential barrier towards de Siitter space will be formed thus
    releasing the force of Type Ia supernova upon the terrestrial ecosphere,
    the solar system and those nearby stars. These energies are from de Sitter
    space, therefore; the energies of the accelerator only serve as a trigger
    for their release.

    With sufficient energies, under this postulation, we discover that the
    accelerator is in the Einstein de Sitter universe, as it is now termed,
    and we have gone from particle physics as our governing theory to
    relativistic cosmology.

    Statistically speaking, Type Ia Supernovae are distinguished by having
    much greater luminosity at point of maximum light and they are of around
    1.40 solar masses or less and also show no presence of hydrogen at maximum
    light as well. Should this be caused via a transition towards de Sitter
    space then there should be no alteration of hydrogen towards calcium or
    other elements in deflagration of Supernova Type Ia. Other types of
    supernovae of I Types show presence of helium at time of maximum light.
    Should there be exemplars of greater mass levels for Type Ia supernovae
    this would again illustrate the artifical nature, e.g., high-energy
    physics experimentation generation of a transition towards de Sitter
    space. This indicates that CERN as an experimental configuration should generate a Type Ia Supernova thus supporting the work of Albert Einstein and the generalization of the Generalized Theory of Relativity
    by Willem de Sitter.

    http://www.google.com/search?pz=1&ne...tnmeta=searc
    h%3Dsearch=Search+the+Web

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_Ia_supernova

    http://www.space.com/scienceastronom..._atypical.html

    Please note there is now a limited time frame to bring this supernova generation to the attention of the director of CERN
    where the time of onset is now this November, 2009. May we offer our services to offer to present or debate the forthcoming destruction of our planet, our solar system and a host nearby stars via the generation of a Type Ia Supernova. Please contact at: dixon at hawaii.edu

    http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/

    Where there is no evidence of either helium or hydrogen at maximum light for Type Ia supernova this would further support the hypothesis of a transition towards de Sitter space. This is evidence of a statistical nature.

    http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1996PASJ...48...51S
    Title: Type-Ia Supernova SN 1995D in NGC 2962: Optical V, R, and I Band
    Photometry and Spectra, Sadakane, K., Yokoo, T., Arimoto, J.-I., Matsumoto, K., Honda, S., Tanabe, K., ,
    Journal: Publ. of the Astronomical Society of Japan, v.48, p.51-57.
    Bibliographic Code: 1996PASJ...48...51S

    It may be noted in this connection that there is no trace of hydrogen at maximum light for Supernovae Type Ia, which indicates that the companion star for this model is statistically unlikely since most stars are are of an hydrogen dominant order. This observation supports the the origin of these supernovae via a transtion towards de Sitter space or other highly energetic flux. Please note:

    The Golden Standard Type Ia Supernova 2005cf: Observations from the
    Ultraviolet to the Near-Infrared Wavebands
    Wang, X.; Li, W.; Filippenko, A. V.; Foley, R. J.; Kirshner, R. P.;
    Modjaz, M.; Bloom, J.; Brown, P. J.; Carter, D.; Friedman, A. S.; Gal-Yam,
    A.; Ganeshalingam, M.; Hicken, M.; Krisciunas, K.; Milne, P.; Silverman,
    J. M.; Suntzeff, N. B.; Wood-Vasey, W. M.; Cenko, S. B.; Challis, P.; Fox,
    D. B.; Kirkman, D.; Li, J. Z.; Li, T. P.; Malkan, M. A.; Moore, M. R.;
    Reitzel, D. B.; Rich, R. M.; Serduke, F. J. D.; Shang, R. C.; Steele, T.
    N.; Swift, B. J.; Tao, C.; Wong, D. S.; Zhang, S. N.

    For the generation of Type Ia supernova thermonuclear explosion explanations have been proposed, none of them have withstood modern testing.
    http://www.astrophysicsspectator.com...hermonuclear.h
    tml
    Thus the formation of a transnsition towards de Sitter space may be considereed as a viable alternative
    explanatory framework. Before we take the imprudent action of testing additional energies at CERN or yet again at the Fermi Nationional Acclerator Laboratory in Batavia, Illinois, more theoretical research should be employed to verify the safety of this research in highest-energy physics or all is lost.

    An educational presentation may be provided also:
    https://laulima.hawaii.edu/access/co...1010/Education
    Paul W. Dixon is responsible for this presentation, Copyright 2009 Paul W. Dixon.

    Consider the parameters for universe formation as being similar
    to that for Type Ia Supernova generation as being very small and
    vastly energetic. This may be philosophically difficult to comprehend
    yet essentially vital for survival!

    The parameter space of inflationary cosmology is seen in the estimate of chaotic expansion theory of the universe beginning at ~10^-43 seconds after the Big Bang, point origin of the Universe with total duration of expansion of 10^-35 seconds or thereabouts. Here the region of expansion no bigger than 10^-33 cm yielding with simultaneous inflations to reach the observable size of our Universe at l<~10^28 cm .. (Andrei Linde, Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology, La Tex Harwood, Chur, Switzerland, 1990, p39) Andrei Linde is the leading authority in this important work at the Department of Physics at Stanford University.
    http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-th/pdf/0503/0503203v1.pdf

    Should we consider the hypothesis of the uniformity of nature as predictive of the abundance of living forms with some of them attaining the capacity to
    transfer themselves to our location in the universe, what can account for their absence? We may note in this connection that there is only a short delay before a transition towards de Sitter space at CERN, Fermilab or other high-energy physics experimentation has generated a Type Ia Supernova as demonstrated in this thread. The frequency of Type Ia Supernova in the observable universe would then signal the termination of these technically advanced civilizations. A technical experimental mischance may then occur before the members of the respective civilizations are philosophically ready to accept this possibllity.

    The approach of the transition towards de Sitter space at Fermilab
    with the ongoing increase in luminoisty is seen:
    http://www.fnal.gov/pub/now/tevlum.html
    with these energies are now equivalent to those found at the point
    origin of the universe. i..e. "The Big Bang."

    We need to consider the increased evidence of water on Mars and the possibilty of water
    on other planetary bodies as the source of life as well as intelligent life thus supporting the hypothesis
    that other creatures much like ourselves can be a source of Type Ia Supernovae.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7919113.stm

    It is generally agreed that the the Large Hadron Collider will provide an
    empirical test for the formation of transition towards de Sitter space.
    The collisional energetcis are much greater that those tested in the
    Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Batavia Illinois.

    "The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is being built in a circular tunnel 27 km
    in circumference. The tunnel is buried around 50 to 175 m. underground. It
    straddles the Swiss and French borders on the outskirts of Geneva.

    The first beams were circulated successfully on 10th September 2008.
    ...fortunately on 19th September a serious fault developed damaging a
    number of superconducting magnets. The repair will require a long
    technical intervention which overlaps with the planned winter shutdown.
    The LHC beam will, therefore, not see beam again before September 2009.

    The LHC is designed to collide two counter rotating beams of protons or
    heavy ions. Proton-proton collisions are foreseen at an energy of 7 TeV
    per beam."

    The competing hypothesis which is considered even more objectionable than the transition towards de Sitter space is given in the False Vacuum solution to the Einstein de Sitter equations. Yet as can be seen in this formulation high-energy physics experimentation may serve as a trigger for this most untoward event.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_vacuum

    Please note in this regard that the transition towards de Sitter space is well-known in the cosmological literature. http://www.springerlink.com/content/p8377167602421t1/

    An affidavit regarding the contingency of a Type Ia Supernova has been submitted as part of the legal action to bring a moratorium against such an experimental mischance.
    http://dockets.justia.com/docket/cou...case_id-78717/
    Many thanks for the happy birthday wishes!!!

    With the additional energies available at the LHC in CERN, it may also be possible to test the competing hypothesis of forming a transition to the lower condition in the Einstein de Sitter Universe. Following the formation of this transition, our Universe would drain off into the lower energy condition. This should be of a lesser probabilty of occurence yet it is still considered as a possible outcome to this research.

    Please note: http://professordixon.blogspot.com

    The WORLD RECORD luminosity now employed at the accelerator (Please note:
    Accelerator Division Notification on the Fermilab Home Page) is 362.37 E30.
    In scientific notation, this 362.37 x 10 to the 30th power particle interactions. With a beam energy of 10 to the 11th power electron volts, we have then the energy of the current work at Fermilab set a 362.37 x 10 to the 41st power electron volts (362.37 E 41 eV). This is much greater than the largest energies seen on earth via cosmic ray interactions at 10 to the 19th power eV (E 19 eV). Without publicity regarding this most critical danger,
    a breach in the potential barrier may occur at any moment thus releasing
    the force of a supernova on our planet and solar system. We will thus have an intrusional event from de Sitter space in the Einstein de Sitter Universe
    as it is now termed. Your kind and generous action on behalf of all
    mankind is greatly needed at this critical juncture or all is lost and we
    shall all perish.

    Please note that the return flight of the Columbia shuttle was not halted because of the false belief that the the foam shards could not cause a life threatening defect in the aerodynamic properties of the shuttle.
    http://www.reuters.com/article/lates.../idUSN30568874

    As a fictional work, the novel Anathem remarks on scientists tinkering with what they do not understand. To quote from the journal Nature, "Anathem is a shrewd exploration of what might happen if the fear of scientists meddling with things they were never meant to know becomes entirely justified." with space-time itself included in the list of potential problem areas.
    (Jennifer Rahn, Imprisoned by intelligence, Neal Stephenson, Anathem, Opinion Nature, 456, 7221, 27 November 2008, 447-447)

    It may be noted in this connection that the term Anathem refers to an ecumenical curse of severe proportions. This may be understood to mean that we are expected to take extreme exception with predjudice to the work of those who would destroy us and our children through this meddling.

    Tycho Brahe's supernova, now identified as a Type Ia Supernova, shows those characteristics as predicted by the model expected in supernova from experimentation. A large Supernova has been generated leaving behind a type G star such as is found in our solar system. (Andrea Pastorello, Astrophysics, Echo from an ancient supernova, Nature 456, 7222, 4 December 2008, 587-589) The technique of light echoes was used for this identification of an historical object.

    As noted in Chang, J.,et al., An excess of cosmic ray electrons at energies of 300-800 GeV (Nature, 456, 7220, 20 November 2008, pp. 362-365) could be tapping into "muti-dimensional spaces with potenially important implications for our understanding of the Universe." Similarly, we may postulate that Type Ia supernovae are expressing the energetics of an n-dimensional space
    whose properties may be understood with further study.

    Please note that while the Type II Supernovae have origin in 10 or more solar mass objects Type Ia Supernovae have origin in objects of some 1 solar mass.
    It may be noted in this connection that the smaller massed Supernova give rise to deflagration of some 10 billion solar luminosities whilst the larger objects give rise to some 1 billion solar luminosity deflagration objects. This difference may lend support that the energetics of Type Ia Supernovae is created via an aperture formed towards de Sitter space. As also noted in this connection, there is no trace of hydrogen at maximum light for Type Ia Supernovae thus making it statistically unlikely that they have reached the Chandrssekhar limit by accretion from a nearby solar object.

    http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...ro/snovcn.html

    The formation of Type 1a Supernovae is dependent on them reaching the Chandrasekhar limit of greater than 1.4 solar mass to implode into a Supernova according to current theory.

    http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...ro/snovcn.html

    Yet there is evidence that the Type !a Supernova can form at one solar mass
    or less thus contradicting current theory and thus supporting the alternate theory where Type Ia Suoernovae may be formed via the formation of a transition towards de Sitter space.
    Probing Dark Energy with Supernovae
    by Sebastian Ihle
    9.6.2006

    As noted in our sciforums discussion, there are a number of competing hypotheses. An empirical investigation is under way at CERN in the LHC.
    Should we generate a Type Ia Supernova, this will confirm the existence of a
    highly energetic topologically cobordant continuum termed de Sitter space.
    So far, the astrophysical theoretical generalizations of the generalized theory of relativity have been confirmed at the 100% level. The world's largest experiment may yet create a tragic confirmatiion of Albert Einstein's theory.

    Please recall that the energies now proposed for the LHC at CERN will be some 7 times greater that those employed at FERMILAB. As is well-known, the energies in use at FERMILAB approximate those predicted for those found at the point origin of the Universe. Thus even from a Common Sense perspective we may penetrate the potential barrier towards de Sitter space
    thus releasing the force of Type Ia Supernova on our planet with the increaased energies to be employed at the LHC. Please note:

    Philosophy and Common Sense (Frances)

    "Not every philosophy professor takes philosophy seriously in the sense
    that she thinks that some purely philosophical theories that go against
    common sense have a good chance to be true. These philosophers respect
    anti-commonsensical theories, in that they admit such theories are very
    important in the pursuit of philosophical understanding. But they also
    think that there is no real chance that they are true. If you have a valid
    argument based not on scientific but purely philosophical reasoning, and
    that argument concludes with something against cross-cultural and timeless
    common sense, then at least one of the premises isnt true, or so they say.
    It might be tremendously difficult to identify the mistaken premise, but
    we can start our investigation off assuming that our assumption that the
    conclusion is false is safe. These philosophers take philosophising
    seriously, of course, but they dont take seriously the idea that purely
    philosophical (so not empirical, not mathematical) theories have a good
    chance at overthrowing parts of common sense."

    A videotaped presentation of this statement is under preparation. Link to this will be provided as soon as it is made ready. This should provide a more interesting source. We welcome any suggestions you may have in this connection for illustrative material. Please let us know what Malcolm Perry would indicate regarding the formation of a transition towards de Sitter space via highest-energy physics experimentation.

    Highest energy physics is an empirical science as noted below. We may then discover through experimentation the answer to our theoretical questions
    which are then derived from observation. Should the ongoing LHC at CERN produce the Higgs boson and field, this would then be a major victory for the Standatrard Model in Physics. Should we note the generation of a Type Ia Supernova, this will further confirm the current record of 100% successful predictions of the Generalized Theory of Relavity of Albert Einstein. These energies to be generated at CERN are those energy levels seen some 10^-9 - 10^-14 seconds subsequent to the point origin of the Universe. Experimentally we note that these energies are deemed sufficient for the testing of these hypotheses.

    Please access this webpage for a thorough update on the LHC at CERN.

    http://www.lhcdefense.org/

    Generation of Type Ia Supernova via a transition to de Sitter space may be added to this description as a consequence of highest energy physics experimentation.

    There has been a brief hiatus introduced from now until April or thereabouts for the reactivation of the LHC at CERN. We should consider all possible alternatives before this gravely irresponsible experiment begins anew.

    Please recall that the activation of the Large Hadron Collider at CERN is the onset of the largest highest-energy experiment so far extant on our planet.
    The empirical observation of a Type Ia Supernova will serve as another confirmation of the Generalized Theory of Albert Einstein. This theory, as noted below, has had 100% verifcation in other astrophysical observations.
    Let us not be so rash as to further test this theory and lose all that we hold most dear as a sacrifice to the ambitions of ruthless egoism and professional incompetence. We may discover the Higgs boson and field and yet create a perforation in the potential barrier towards de Sitter space and create a Supernova. The tentative date for the onset of the collisional actions at CERN is now around May 1, 2009.

    From the LHC Machine Outreach

    The LHC is designed to collide two counter rotating beams of protons or
    heavy ions. Proton-proton collisions are foreseen at an energy of 7 TeV
    per beam.

    The WORLD RECORD luminosity now employed per example at the US accelerator (Please note:
    Accelerator Division Notification on the Fermilab Home Page) is
    288.89E30.
    In scientific
    notation, this 288.89 x 10 to the 30th power particle interactions. With
    a beam energy of 10 to the 11th power electron volts, we have then the
    energy of the current work at Fermilab set a 288.89 x 10 to the 41st
    power
    electron volts (288.89 E 41 eV). This is much greater than the largest
    energies seen on earth via cosmic ray interactions at 10 to the 19th
    power eV (E 19 eV). Without publicity regarding this most critical danger,
    a breach in the potential barrier may occur at any moment thus releasing
    the force of a supernova on our planet and solar system. We will thus have an
    intrusional event from de Sitter space in the Einstein de Sitter Universe
    as it is now termed. Your kind and generous action on behalf of all
    mankind is greatly needed at this critical juncture or all is lost and we
    shall all perish as this undergoes a vast increment at CERN.

    As one of the seven plaintiffs in the District Court in Hawaii, may I offer a formal complaint agasinst Director of CERN Robert Aymar and to John Ellis chief theoretican of CERN to appear in the International Court in the Hague to answer charges of gross negligence in the operation of the Large Hadron Collider at CERN. As noted in this post, is the formal derivation of the generation of Type Ia Supernova from their experiment following the well-known work of Albert Einstein and his colleague Willem de Sitter in the generalized theory of relativity. The energies in nature do not approximate those found some 10^-9 to 10^-14 seconds subsequent to the Big Bang at the pont origin of the Universe without forming a transition towards de Sitter space as noted per exemplar in Type II supernovae and in quasars. Their willingness to proceed with this experiment with full knowledge of this potentiallity consititutes a criminal act of public endangerment. May we request that the good people of Switzerland discontinue power service to CERN until this matter has reached full legal disposition in the International Court in the Hague.

    May I add a personal note to this discussion. We should preserve the
    future for all mankind. Children have the right to grow-up in a safe and
    sheltered environment. We need to give our children the time to dream and
    grow into all future time. We should visit other planets, other stars, other
    galaxies to see and understand all things. Let us call for patience in
    this research endeavor until we are certain of the potential dangers that
    may lurk for the unsuspecting researcher. One Supernova will terminate all
    that we hold most dear.

    Update on the research progress at CERN.

    End of July: First particles may be injected, and the commissioning with
    beams and collisions will start.
    It is expected that it will take about 2 months to have first collisions
    at 10 TeV. Please note that only one area remains at below collisional
    energies.

    We shall now observe at CERN the onset of collisional energies at far
    greater impact than those observed at Fermilab.

    http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=...der-first-beam

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7512586.stm

    The Director General of CERN Robert Aymar as well as the safety officers
    of CERN have received the appended posting. We may hope that this message
    will alert them to the forthcoming generation of a Type Ia Supernova from
    the experimental highest-energy physics at CERN. So far, as the
    preparation for the LHC experiment continues, there has been no refutation
    of the theoretical work of Albert Einstein and the extension of his
    Generalized Theory of Relativity by Willem de Sitter. This forms the basis
    of our understanding of the Einstein de Sitter Universe as it is now
    termed. A review of the cosmological perspective is provided in the generation of Type Ia Supernova:
    http://professordixon.blogspot.com/


    Please note: Cool down at CERN is near completion as all segments are in
    the blue condition. Collisional energetics should now be observed shortly.
    May God have mercy on the souls of all our children.
    http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/

    As we are in engaged in an eschatological discourse, the "philosophy of
    last things," we need to distinguish between black hole generation as well
    as strangelets and Type Ia Supernova. Their generation and their effects
    are uncertain whilst Type Ia Supernova Generation is almost completely
    certain as are as any of the effects under the auspices of Albert
    Einstein's generalized theory of relativity. Please note: Dragging of
    Inertial Frames (Ignazio Ciufloni (2007) Nature 7158, 449, 41-53) Walter
    L. Wagner and I have discusssed this. Type Ia Supernova generation will be
    sudden and the destruction of our planet, our solar system and a host of
    nearby stars will follow. Should the CERN LHC (Large Hadron Collider) cool
    down schedule proceed as now planned, an empirical test of the hypothesis
    of Type Ia Supernova generation via highest energy physics experimentation
    will commence in June/July 2008. The 7 Tev phase of the research would
    then begin at this time. Please note: http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/
    cooldown progress in preparation of the empirical test of this hypotheisis
    at the LHC in CERN as noted above.

    Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
    by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)


    It may be helpful to clarify the philosophical position and astrophysical
    energetics instrinsic to de Sitter space in the standard cosmological
    model in this postulation of transition from de Sitter space as generative
    of supernova in high-energy physics experimentation.

    A philosophical position may be cited from, G. W. F. Hegel (The philosophy
    of history, New York: Dover, 249, 1956) ..." there is no essential
    existence which does not manifest itself." The very large energies derived
    by Willem de Sitter for the equations describing the false vacuum of de
    Sitter space yield an energy density of 1.69 x 10^126 for eV (electron
    volts) per cm^3. (Gott, R. (1982) Creation of open universes from de
    Sitter space, Nature, 295, 304-307. In Waldrop. M.M., (1982) Bubbles upon
    the river of time, Science, 215, 4536, 1082-1083), the energy density of
    de Sitter space is given as: 5 x 10^31 kelvin and 3 x 10^93 grams per cm^3
    , converted to eV via e=mc^2 which is Albert Einstein's famous equation.
    This energy would then find expression in the observable universe. In the
    sense of this analysis, it would be quite unlikely that energies of this
    order of magnitude would remain hidden should a transition be formed in
    the potential barrier towards de Sitter space. This would serve as an
    immediate and ever present danger for the investigator and constitutes a
    public endangerment as well.

    This is based on the mainstream theory of universe formation by Professor
    R. Gott of Princeton University in which each bubble universe forms
    smoothly out of de Sitter space. A potentially infinite number of
    universes may form in de Sitter space. In a topological sense, de Sitter
    space is cobordant at each point with the continuum (our universe). De
    Sitter space is then prevented by a large potential barrier from forming
    an intrusional event into the continuum. The essential hypothesis of this
    formulation is that with sufficiently great energetics, a classical breach
    in the potential barrier towards de Siitter space will be formed thus
    releasing the force of Type Ia supernova upon the terrestrial ecosphere,
    the solar system and those nearby stars. These energies are from de Sitter
    space, therefore; the energies of the accelerator only serve as a trigger
    for their release.

    With sufficient energies, under this postulation, we discover that the
    accelerator is in the Einstein de Sitter universe, as it is now termed,
    and we have gone from particle physics as our governing theory to
    relativistic cosmology.

    This supports of the theoretcal position that sufficient energy will penetrate the potential barrier towards de Sitter space thus releasing the force of an exploding Universe i.e., Supernova, on our planet. The works of Albert Einstein and Willem de Sitter as shown here have never been refuted.

    From the viewpoint of classical physics, the penetration towards de Sitter space is prevented by a large though not infinite potential barrier as described by Malcolm Perry. As the energies in the collliders go from 10^-9 seconds to 10^-14 seconds subsequent to the big bang at the point origin of the Universe, this penetrance becomes inevitable thus releasing the force of a Type Ia Supernova on our planet, solar system and host of nearby stars.

    All the children will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf.

    Yours sincerely,

    Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
    Supernova from Experimentation
     
  19. Billy T Use Sugar Cane Alcohol car Fuel Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,198
    I agree the energy density, (if it exists) in de Sitter space is fantastically greater than in our universe, but find it strange that that high energy density is not able to (never has) tunnel thru the barrier. How can the punty energy density man can make tunnel thru the barrier yet much greater de Sitter space energy cannot?

    PS I know it is your policy to never answer a direct question, but I ask so others may think about this question.
     
  20. Paul W. Dixon Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    505
    SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT CERN AND FERMILAB

    Of further note in this connection, is additional evidence for the
    presence of de Sitter space in astronomical observations. Type Ia
    Supernovae are more energetic than other Supernovae by a factor of some 2.4. This is the case even though the progenitor object is of some 1 solar mass or less. These objects may then be below the Chandrasekar limit necessary for the
    implosion threshold necessary for the generation of Supernovae.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernova

    Other evidence for the intrusional events from de Sitter space may be
    noted in the monopolar jets from quasars. These objects are four to five
    times larger than bipolar objects. Where the fluxional energetics of these
    variables is measured in millions of galaxies, it would appear plausible
    to assume that there is a unique source of energetics for these larger
    objects (i.e. de Sitter space) since there is a dichotomous distinction
    between Class I and Class II objects. (Burns, J. O.(1990) Chasing the
    monster's tail: new views of cosmic jets. Astronomy, (18) 8, 28-37) Recent
    observations in suppot this postulation are found in, Discovery of a
    bright quasar without a massive host galaxy (Magain, P. Letawe, G.,
    Courbin, F., Jablonka, P., Jahnke, K., Meylan, G., Wisotzki, l., (2005)
    7057, 437, pp. 381-384). Thus indicating that the enormous fluxional
    energetics of millions of galaxies over thousands of light-years extending
    for billions of years may have origin in de Sitter space or other similar
    energetic domain.

    We have received approximately a month's reprieve thanks to the excellent judgement of the great people of Switzerland. Where quantum tunnelling may occur to an exploding universe so through this same potential barrier which permits quantum tunnelling a breach in the potential barrier towards de
    Sitter space will initiate a Supernova. There is only one Supernova per civilization and all is lost.
    Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
    by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)

    The energy intensity at CERN is now testing the hypothesis that we are now at the threshold of breaching the potential barrier towards de Sitter space. Much greater increments in energy are anticpated at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN.

    "On the evening of Tuesday, 8 December, two bunches per beam circulated for the first time at 1.18 TeV for a short period and ATLAS recorded its first collisions at the record energy of 2.36 TeV (centre of mass)."

    Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
    by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)

    One of the mathematical understandings in modern cosmology is that
    De Sitter space is topologically covariant with the continuum at every
    point. Thus sufficiant energy from the Large Hadron Collider can
    penetrate the potential barier towards de Sitter space releasing the force
    of a Supernova. We are most deeply indebted to you for your kind
    interest and understanding in this matter

    We note also: in the CERN news bulletin
    "For the first time also, lead ions have arrived at the doorstep of the
    LHC." ESSAY , The Collider, The Particle and a Theory about Fate
    (The New York Times, Dennis Overbye) It may be anticipated that we can
    reset the cosmic timetable for our planet and a host of nearby stars back to the
    interstellar medium.

    A notice from the LHC administration for your interest. Please take what what action you deem
    necessary in this connection. All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf.

    "The Latest from the LHC: Towards the big chill
    With 6 sectors out of 8 at nominal cryogenic temperature (1.9 K= about
    -271 C), the commissioning at the LHC is progressing well. According to
    the present schedule, the whole machine will be cold in about two weeks.

    Final operations to fill the nitrogen tanks for cooling the last sector to
    80K.
    Only Sectors 3-4 and 6-7 are still in the cooling phase (currently between
    60 and 20 K). As already mentioned in the previous update, as soon as a
    sector reaches the nominal cryogenic temperature, teams can start powering
    the magnets. At present, the current is flowing in the magnets of three
    sectors, while the remaining three will be powered in the coming two
    weeks."

    It may be intuitively more comprehensible to perceive the influx of energy as an electrical discharge since it would be the penetration of a potential barrier towards de Sitter space which releases the force of a Type Ia Supernova.

    As cited in the astrophysical literature, the energies resident in de Sitter space are vast enough to provide for the energies in a Type Ia Supernova.
    Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
    by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)

    It may be helpful to clarify the philosophical position and astrophysical
    energetics instrinsic to de Sitter space in the standard cosmological
    model in this postulation of transition from de Sitter space as generative
    of supernova in high-energy physics experimentation.

    A philosophical position may be cited from, G. W. F. Hegel (The philosophy
    of history, New York: Dover, 249, 1956) ..." there is no essential
    existence which does not manifest itself." The very large energies derived
    by Willem de Sitter for the equations describing the false vacuum of de
    Sitter space yield an energy density of 1.69 x 10^126 for eV (electron
    volts) per cm^3. (Gott, R. (1982) Creation of open universes from de
    Sitter space, Nature, 295, 304-307. In Waldrop. M.M., (1982) Bubbles upon
    the river of time, Science, 215, 4536, 1082-1083), the energy density of
    de Sitter space is given as: 5 x 10^31 kelvin and 3 x 10^93 grams per cm^3
    , converted to eV via e=mc^2 which is Albert Einstein's famous equation.
    This energy would then find expression in the observable universe. In the
    sense of this analysis, it would be quite unlikely that energies of this
    order of magnitude would remain hidden should a transition be formed in
    the potential barrier towards de Sitter space. This would serve as an
    immediate and ever present danger for the investigator and constitutes a
    public endangerment as well.

    This is based on the mainstream theory of universe formation by Professor
    R. Gott of Princeton University in which each bubble universe forms
    smoothly out of de Sitter space. A potentially infinite number of
    universes may form in de Sitter space. In a topological sense, de Sitter
    space is cobordant at each point with the continuum (our universe). De
    Sitter space is then prevented by a large potential barrier from forming
    an intrusional event into the continuum. The essential hypothesis of this
    formulation is that with sufficiently great energetics, a classical breach
    in the potential barrier towards de Siitter space will be formed thus
    releasing the force of Type Ia supernova upon the terrestrial ecosphere,
    the solar system and those nearby stars. These energies are from de Sitter
    space, therefore; the energies of the accelerator only serve as a trigger
    for their release.

    With sufficient energies, under this postulation, we discover that the
    accelerator is in the Einstein de Sitter universe, as it is now termed,
    and we have gone from particle physics as our governing theory to
    relativistic cosmology.

    Statistically speaking, Type Ia Supernovae are distinguished by having
    much greater luminosity at point of maximum light and they are of around
    1.40 solar masses or less and also show no presence of hydrogen at maximum
    light as well. Should this be caused via a transition towards de Sitter
    space then there should be no alteration of hydrogen towards calcium or
    other elements in deflagration of Supernova Type Ia. Other types of
    supernovae of I Types show presence of helium at time of maximum light.
    Should there be exemplars of greater mass levels for Type Ia supernovae
    this would again illustrate the artifical nature, e.g., high-energy
    physics experimentation generation of a transition towards de Sitter
    space. This indicates that CERN as an experimental configuration should generate a Type Ia Supernova thus supporting the work of Albert Einstein and the generalization of the Generalized Theory of Relativity
    by Willem de Sitter.

    http://www.google.com/search?pz=1&ne...tnmeta=searc
    h%3Dsearch=Search+the+Web

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_Ia_supernova

    http://www.space.com/scienceastronom..._atypical.html

    Please note there is now a limited time frame to bring this supernova generation to the attention of the director of CERN
    where the time of onset is now this November, 2009. May we offer our services to offer to present or debate the forthcoming destruction of our planet, our solar system and a host nearby stars via the generation of a Type Ia Supernova. Please contact at: dixon at hawaii.edu

    http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/

    Where there is no evidence of either helium or hydrogen at maximum light for Type Ia supernova this would further support the hypothesis of a transition towards de Sitter space. This is evidence of a statistical nature.

    http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1996PASJ...48...51S
    Title: Type-Ia Supernova SN 1995D in NGC 2962: Optical V, R, and I Band
    Photometry and Spectra, Sadakane, K., Yokoo, T., Arimoto, J.-I., Matsumoto, K., Honda, S., Tanabe, K., ,
    Journal: Publ. of the Astronomical Society of Japan, v.48, p.51-57.
    Bibliographic Code: 1996PASJ...48...51S

    It may be noted in this connection that there is no trace of hydrogen at maximum light for Supernovae Type Ia, which indicates that the companion star for this model is statistically unlikely since most stars are are of an hydrogen dominant order. This observation supports the the origin of these supernovae via a transtion towards de Sitter space or other highly energetic flux. Please note:

    The Golden Standard Type Ia Supernova 2005cf: Observations from the
    Ultraviolet to the Near-Infrared Wavebands
    Wang, X.; Li, W.; Filippenko, A. V.; Foley, R. J.; Kirshner, R. P.;
    Modjaz, M.; Bloom, J.; Brown, P. J.; Carter, D.; Friedman, A. S.; Gal-Yam,
    A.; Ganeshalingam, M.; Hicken, M.; Krisciunas, K.; Milne, P.; Silverman,
    J. M.; Suntzeff, N. B.; Wood-Vasey, W. M.; Cenko, S. B.; Challis, P.; Fox,
    D. B.; Kirkman, D.; Li, J. Z.; Li, T. P.; Malkan, M. A.; Moore, M. R.;
    Reitzel, D. B.; Rich, R. M.; Serduke, F. J. D.; Shang, R. C.; Steele, T.
    N.; Swift, B. J.; Tao, C.; Wong, D. S.; Zhang, S. N.

    For the generation of Type Ia supernova thermonuclear explosion explanations have been proposed, none of them have withstood modern testing.
    http://www.astrophysicsspectator.com...hermonuclear.h
    tml
    Thus the formation of a transnsition towards de Sitter space may be considereed as a viable alternative
    explanatory framework. Before we take the imprudent action of testing additional energies at CERN or yet again at the Fermi Nationional Acclerator Laboratory in Batavia, Illinois, more theoretical research should be employed to verify the safety of this research in highest-energy physics or all is lost.

    An educational presentation may be provided also:
    https://laulima.hawaii.edu/access/co...1010/Education
    Paul W. Dixon is responsible for this presentation, Copyright 2009 Paul W. Dixon.

    Consider the parameters for universe formation as being similar
    to that for Type Ia Supernova generation as being very small and
    vastly energetic. This may be philosophically difficult to comprehend
    yet essentially vital for survival!

    The parameter space of inflationary cosmology is seen in the estimate of chaotic expansion theory of the universe beginning at ~10^-43 seconds after the Big Bang, point origin of the Universe with total duration of expansion of 10^-35 seconds or thereabouts. Here the region of expansion no bigger than 10^-33 cm yielding with simultaneous inflations to reach the observable size of our Universe at l<~10^28 cm .. (Andrei Linde, Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology, La Tex Harwood, Chur, Switzerland, 1990, p39) Andrei Linde is the leading authority in this important work at the Department of Physics at Stanford University.
    http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-th/pdf/0503/0503203v1.pdf

    Should we consider the hypothesis of the uniformity of nature as predictive of the abundance of living forms with some of them attaining the capacity to
    transfer themselves to our location in the universe, what can account for their absence? We may note in this connection that there is only a short delay before a transition towards de Sitter space at CERN, Fermilab or other high-energy physics experimentation has generated a Type Ia Supernova as demonstrated in this thread. The frequency of Type Ia Supernova in the observable universe would then signal the termination of these technically advanced civilizations. A technical experimental mischance may then occur before the members of the respective civilizations are philosophically ready to accept this possibllity.

    The approach of the transition towards de Sitter space at Fermilab
    with the ongoing increase in luminoisty is seen:
    http://www.fnal.gov/pub/now/tevlum.html
    with these energies are now equivalent to those found at the point
    origin of the universe. i..e. "The Big Bang."

    We need to consider the increased evidence of water on Mars and the possibilty of water
    on other planetary bodies as the source of life as well as intelligent life thus supporting the hypothesis
    that other creatures much like ourselves can be a source of Type Ia Supernovae.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7919113.stm

    It is generally agreed that the the Large Hadron Collider will provide an
    empirical test for the formation of transition towards de Sitter space.
    The collisional energetcis are much greater that those tested in the
    Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Batavia Illinois.

    "The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is being built in a circular tunnel 27 km
    in circumference. The tunnel is buried around 50 to 175 m. underground. It
    straddles the Swiss and French borders on the outskirts of Geneva.

    The first beams were circulated successfully on 10th September 2008.
    ...fortunately on 19th September a serious fault developed damaging a
    number of superconducting magnets. The repair will require a long
    technical intervention which overlaps with the planned winter shutdown.
    The LHC beam will, therefore, not see beam again before September 2009.

    The LHC is designed to collide two counter rotating beams of protons or
    heavy ions. Proton-proton collisions are foreseen at an energy of 7 TeV
    per beam."

    The competing hypothesis which is considered even more objectionable than the transition towards de Sitter space is given in the False Vacuum solution to the Einstein de Sitter equations. Yet as can be seen in this formulation high-energy physics experimentation may serve as a trigger for this most untoward event.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_vacuum

    Please note in this regard that the transition towards de Sitter space is well-known in the cosmological literature. http://www.springerlink.com/content/p8377167602421t1/

    An affidavit regarding the contingency of a Type Ia Supernova has been submitted as part of the legal action to bring a moratorium against such an experimental mischance.
    http://dockets.justia.com/docket/cou...case_id-78717/
    Many thanks for the happy birthday wishes!!!

    With the additional energies available at the LHC in CERN, it may also be possible to test the competing hypothesis of forming a transition to the lower condition in the Einstein de Sitter Universe. Following the formation of this transition, our Universe would drain off into the lower energy condition. This should be of a lesser probabilty of occurence yet it is still considered as a possible outcome to this research.

    Please note: http://professordixon.blogspot.com

    The WORLD RECORD luminosity now employed at the accelerator (Please note:
    Accelerator Division Notification on the Fermilab Home Page) is 362.37 E30.
    In scientific notation, this 362.37 x 10 to the 30th power particle interactions. With a beam energy of 10 to the 11th power electron volts, we have then the energy of the current work at Fermilab set a 362.37 x 10 to the 41st power electron volts (362.37 E 41 eV). This is much greater than the largest energies seen on earth via cosmic ray interactions at 10 to the 19th power eV (E 19 eV). Without publicity regarding this most critical danger,
    a breach in the potential barrier may occur at any moment thus releasing
    the force of a supernova on our planet and solar system. We will thus have an intrusional event from de Sitter space in the Einstein de Sitter Universe
    as it is now termed. Your kind and generous action on behalf of all
    mankind is greatly needed at this critical juncture or all is lost and we
    shall all perish.

    Please note that the return flight of the Columbia shuttle was not halted because of the false belief that the the foam shards could not cause a life threatening defect in the aerodynamic properties of the shuttle.
    http://www.reuters.com/article/lates.../idUSN30568874

    As a fictional work, the novel Anathem remarks on scientists tinkering with what they do not understand. To quote from the journal Nature, "Anathem is a shrewd exploration of what might happen if the fear of scientists meddling with things they were never meant to know becomes entirely justified." with space-time itself included in the list of potential problem areas.
    (Jennifer Rahn, Imprisoned by intelligence, Neal Stephenson, Anathem, Opinion Nature, 456, 7221, 27 November 2008, 447-447)

    It may be noted in this connection that the term Anathem refers to an ecumenical curse of severe proportions. This may be understood to mean that we are expected to take extreme exception with predjudice to the work of those who would destroy us and our children through this meddling.

    Tycho Brahe's supernova, now identified as a Type Ia Supernova, shows those characteristics as predicted by the model expected in supernova from experimentation. A large Supernova has been generated leaving behind a type G star such as is found in our solar system. (Andrea Pastorello, Astrophysics, Echo from an ancient supernova, Nature 456, 7222, 4 December 2008, 587-589) The technique of light echoes was used for this identification of an historical object.

    As noted in Chang, J.,et al., An excess of cosmic ray electrons at energies of 300-800 GeV (Nature, 456, 7220, 20 November 2008, pp. 362-365) could be tapping into "muti-dimensional spaces with potenially important implications for our understanding of the Universe." Similarly, we may postulate that Type Ia supernovae are expressing the energetics of an n-dimensional space
    whose properties may be understood with further study.

    Please note that while the Type II Supernovae have origin in 10 or more solar mass objects Type Ia Supernovae have origin in objects of some 1 solar mass.
    It may be noted in this connection that the smaller massed Supernova give rise to deflagration of some 10 billion solar luminosities whilst the larger objects give rise to some 1 billion solar luminosity deflagration objects. This difference may lend support that the energetics of Type Ia Supernovae is created via an aperture formed towards de Sitter space. As also noted in this connection, there is no trace of hydrogen at maximum light for Type Ia Supernovae thus making it statistically unlikely that they have reached the Chandrssekhar limit by accretion from a nearby solar object.

    http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...ro/snovcn.html

    The formation of Type 1a Supernovae is dependent on them reaching the Chandrasekhar limit of greater than 1.4 solar mass to implode into a Supernova according to current theory.

    http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...ro/snovcn.html

    Yet there is evidence that the Type !a Supernova can form at one solar mass
    or less thus contradicting current theory and thus supporting the alternate theory where Type Ia Suoernovae may be formed via the formation of a transition towards de Sitter space.
    Probing Dark Energy with Supernovae
    by Sebastian Ihle
    9.6.2006

    As noted in our sciforums discussion, there are a number of competing hypotheses. An empirical investigation is under way at CERN in the LHC.
    Should we generate a Type Ia Supernova, this will confirm the existence of a
    highly energetic topologically cobordant continuum termed de Sitter space.
    So far, the astrophysical theoretical generalizations of the generalized theory of relativity have been confirmed at the 100% level. The world's largest experiment may yet create a tragic confirmatiion of Albert Einstein's theory.

    Please recall that the energies now proposed for the LHC at CERN will be some 7 times greater that those employed at FERMILAB. As is well-known, the energies in use at FERMILAB approximate those predicted for those found at the point origin of the Universe. Thus even from a Common Sense perspective we may penetrate the potential barrier towards de Sitter space
    thus releasing the force of Type Ia Supernova on our planet with the increaased energies to be employed at the LHC. Please note:

    Philosophy and Common Sense (Frances)

    "Not every philosophy professor takes philosophy seriously in the sense
    that she thinks that some purely philosophical theories that go against
    common sense have a good chance to be true. These philosophers respect
    anti-commonsensical theories, in that they admit such theories are very
    important in the pursuit of philosophical understanding. But they also
    think that there is no real chance that they are true. If you have a valid
    argument based not on scientific but purely philosophical reasoning, and
    that argument concludes with something against cross-cultural and timeless
    common sense, then at least one of the premises isnt true, or so they say.
    It might be tremendously difficult to identify the mistaken premise, but
    we can start our investigation off assuming that our assumption that the
    conclusion is false is safe. These philosophers take philosophising
    seriously, of course, but they dont take seriously the idea that purely
    philosophical (so not empirical, not mathematical) theories have a good
    chance at overthrowing parts of common sense."

    A videotaped presentation of this statement is under preparation. Link to this will be provided as soon as it is made ready. This should provide a more interesting source. We welcome any suggestions you may have in this connection for illustrative material. Please let us know what Malcolm Perry would indicate regarding the formation of a transition towards de Sitter space via highest-energy physics experimentation.

    Highest energy physics is an empirical science as noted below. We may then discover through experimentation the answer to our theoretical questions
    which are then derived from observation. Should the ongoing LHC at CERN produce the Higgs boson and field, this would then be a major victory for the Standatrard Model in Physics. Should we note the generation of a Type Ia Supernova, this will further confirm the current record of 100% successful predictions of the Generalized Theory of Relavity of Albert Einstein. These energies to be generated at CERN are those energy levels seen some 10^-9 - 10^-14 seconds subsequent to the point origin of the Universe. Experimentally we note that these energies are deemed sufficient for the testing of these hypotheses.

    Please access this webpage for a thorough update on the LHC at CERN.

    http://www.lhcdefense.org/

    Generation of Type Ia Supernova via a transition to de Sitter space may be added to this description as a consequence of highest energy physics experimentation.

    There has been a brief hiatus introduced from now until April or thereabouts for the reactivation of the LHC at CERN. We should consider all possible alternatives before this gravely irresponsible experiment begins anew.

    Please recall that the activation of the Large Hadron Collider at CERN is the onset of the largest highest-energy experiment so far extant on our planet.
    The empirical observation of a Type Ia Supernova will serve as another confirmation of the Generalized Theory of Albert Einstein. This theory, as noted below, has had 100% verifcation in other astrophysical observations.
    Let us not be so rash as to further test this theory and lose all that we hold most dear as a sacrifice to the ambitions of ruthless egoism and professional incompetence. We may discover the Higgs boson and field and yet create a perforation in the potential barrier towards de Sitter space and create a Supernova. The tentative date for the onset of the collisional actions at CERN is now around May 1, 2009.

    From the LHC Machine Outreach

    The LHC is designed to collide two counter rotating beams of protons or
    heavy ions. Proton-proton collisions are foreseen at an energy of 7 TeV
    per beam.

    The WORLD RECORD luminosity now employed per example at the US accelerator (Please note:
    Accelerator Division Notification on the Fermilab Home Page) is
    288.89E30.
    In scientific
    notation, this 288.89 x 10 to the 30th power particle interactions. With
    a beam energy of 10 to the 11th power electron volts, we have then the
    energy of the current work at Fermilab set a 288.89 x 10 to the 41st
    power
    electron volts (288.89 E 41 eV). This is much greater than the largest
    energies seen on earth via cosmic ray interactions at 10 to the 19th
    power eV (E 19 eV). Without publicity regarding this most critical danger,
    a breach in the potential barrier may occur at any moment thus releasing
    the force of a supernova on our planet and solar system. We will thus have an
    intrusional event from de Sitter space in the Einstein de Sitter Universe
    as it is now termed. Your kind and generous action on behalf of all
    mankind is greatly needed at this critical juncture or all is lost and we
    shall all perish as this undergoes a vast increment at CERN.

    As one of the seven plaintiffs in the District Court in Hawaii, may I offer a formal complaint agasinst Director of CERN Robert Aymar and to John Ellis chief theoretican of CERN to appear in the International Court in the Hague to answer charges of gross negligence in the operation of the Large Hadron Collider at CERN. As noted in this post, is the formal derivation of the generation of Type Ia Supernova from their experiment following the well-known work of Albert Einstein and his colleague Willem de Sitter in the generalized theory of relativity. The energies in nature do not approximate those found some 10^-9 to 10^-14 seconds subsequent to the Big Bang at the pont origin of the Universe without forming a transition towards de Sitter space as noted per exemplar in Type II supernovae and in quasars. Their willingness to proceed with this experiment with full knowledge of this potentiallity consititutes a criminal act of public endangerment. May we request that the good people of Switzerland discontinue power service to CERN until this matter has reached full legal disposition in the International Court in the Hague.

    May I add a personal note to this discussion. We should preserve the
    future for all mankind. Children have the right to grow-up in a safe and
    sheltered environment. We need to give our children the time to dream and
    grow into all future time. We should visit other planets, other stars, other
    galaxies to see and understand all things. Let us call for patience in
    this research endeavor until we are certain of the potential dangers that
    may lurk for the unsuspecting researcher. One Supernova will terminate all
    that we hold most dear.

    Update on the research progress at CERN.

    End of July: First particles may be injected, and the commissioning with
    beams and collisions will start.
    It is expected that it will take about 2 months to have first collisions
    at 10 TeV. Please note that only one area remains at below collisional
    energies.

    We shall now observe at CERN the onset of collisional energies at far
    greater impact than those observed at Fermilab.

    http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=...der-first-beam

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7512586.stm

    The Director General of CERN Robert Aymar as well as the safety officers
    of CERN have received the appended posting. We may hope that this message
    will alert them to the forthcoming generation of a Type Ia Supernova from
    the experimental highest-energy physics at CERN. So far, as the
    preparation for the LHC experiment continues, there has been no refutation
    of the theoretical work of Albert Einstein and the extension of his
    Generalized Theory of Relativity by Willem de Sitter. This forms the basis
    of our understanding of the Einstein de Sitter Universe as it is now
    termed. A review of the cosmological perspective is provided in the generation of Type Ia Supernova:
    http://professordixon.blogspot.com/


    Please note: Cool down at CERN is near completion as all segments are in
    the blue condition. Collisional energetics should now be observed shortly.
    May God have mercy on the souls of all our children.
    http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/

    As we are in engaged in an eschatological discourse, the "philosophy of
    last things," we need to distinguish between black hole generation as well
    as strangelets and Type Ia Supernova. Their generation and their effects
    are uncertain whilst Type Ia Supernova Generation is almost completely
    certain as are as any of the effects under the auspices of Albert
    Einstein's generalized theory of relativity. Please note: Dragging of
    Inertial Frames (Ignazio Ciufloni (2007) Nature 7158, 449, 41-53) Walter
    L. Wagner and I have discusssed this. Type Ia Supernova generation will be
    sudden and the destruction of our planet, our solar system and a host of
    nearby stars will follow. Should the CERN LHC (Large Hadron Collider) cool
    down schedule proceed as now planned, an empirical test of the hypothesis
    of Type Ia Supernova generation via highest energy physics experimentation
    will commence in June/July 2008. The 7 Tev phase of the research would
    then begin at this time. Please note: http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/
    cooldown progress in preparation of the empirical test of this hypotheisis
    at the LHC in CERN as noted above.

    Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
    by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)


    It may be helpful to clarify the philosophical position and astrophysical
    energetics instrinsic to de Sitter space in the standard cosmological
    model in this postulation of transition from de Sitter space as generative
    of supernova in high-energy physics experimentation.

    A philosophical position may be cited from, G. W. F. Hegel (The philosophy
    of history, New York: Dover, 249, 1956) ..." there is no essential
    existence which does not manifest itself." The very large energies derived
    by Willem de Sitter for the equations describing the false vacuum of de
    Sitter space yield an energy density of 1.69 x 10^126 for eV (electron
    volts) per cm^3. (Gott, R. (1982) Creation of open universes from de
    Sitter space, Nature, 295, 304-307. In Waldrop. M.M., (1982) Bubbles upon
    the river of time, Science, 215, 4536, 1082-1083), the energy density of
    de Sitter space is given as: 5 x 10^31 kelvin and 3 x 10^93 grams per cm^3
    , converted to eV via e=mc^2 which is Albert Einstein's famous equation.
    This energy would then find expression in the observable universe. In the
    sense of this analysis, it would be quite unlikely that energies of this
    order of magnitude would remain hidden should a transition be formed in
    the potential barrier towards de Sitter space. This would serve as an
    immediate and ever present danger for the investigator and constitutes a
    public endangerment as well.

    This is based on the mainstream theory of universe formation by Professor
    R. Gott of Princeton University in which each bubble universe forms
    smoothly out of de Sitter space. A potentially infinite number of
    universes may form in de Sitter space. In a topological sense, de Sitter
    space is cobordant at each point with the continuum (our universe). De
    Sitter space is then prevented by a large potential barrier from forming
    an intrusional event into the continuum. The essential hypothesis of this
    formulation is that with sufficiently great energetics, a classical breach
    in the potential barrier towards de Siitter space will be formed thus
    releasing the force of Type Ia supernova upon the terrestrial ecosphere,
    the solar system and those nearby stars. These energies are from de Sitter
    space, therefore; the energies of the accelerator only serve as a trigger
    for their release.

    With sufficient energies, under this postulation, we discover that the
    accelerator is in the Einstein de Sitter universe, as it is now termed,
    and we have gone from particle physics as our governing theory to
    relativistic cosmology.

    This supports of the theoretcal position that sufficient energy will penetrate the potential barrier towards de Sitter space thus releasing the force of an exploding Universe i.e., Supernova, on our planet. The works of Albert Einstein and Willem de Sitter as shown here have never been refuted.

    From the viewpoint of classical physics, the penetration towards de Sitter space is prevented by a large though not infinite potential barrier as described by Malcolm Perry. As the energies in the collliders go from 10^-9 seconds to 10^-14 seconds subsequent to the big bang at the point origin of the Universe, this penetrance becomes inevitable thus releasing the force of a Type Ia Supernova on our planet, solar system and host of nearby stars.

    All the children will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf.

    Yours sincerely,

    Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
    Supernova from Experimentation
     
    Last edited: Jan 10, 2010
  21. Paul W. Dixon Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    505
    SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT CERN AND FERMILAB

    Einstein authored the Generalized Theory of Relativity which is very well respected and established in the field of physics circa 1920, and also the Standard Model of Quantum Field Physics begun in the 1970's. The Standard Model is incomplete since it does not encompass gravitational phenomena. Since it is the extension of the
    Generalized Theory of Relativity which predicts to de Sitter space this
    would be a reliable and established prediction based on modern
    relativistic cosmology. We need only wait for the confirmation of this
    prediction with the generation of a Type Ia Supernova from CERN. Billions of dollars are being spent in this pursuit of
    confirmation of the exisence of de Sitter space in the Einstein de Sitter
    Universe as it is now termed.

    Many thanks to everyone for your most kind actions in this tragic concern.
    (Please note: World Record for Luminosity, i.e., greatest energy yet seen
    on earth) Clearly, a scientific enterprise that deals wth energies found
    only fractions of a second after the point origin of the universe should
    proceed with caution and prudence or we shall all perish!

    Of further note in this connection, is additional evidence for the
    presence of de Sitter space in astronomical observations. Type Ia
    Supernovae are more energetic than other Supernovae by a factor of some 2.4. This is the case even though the progenitor object is of some 1 solar mass or less. These objects may then be below the Chandrasekar limit necessary for the
    implosion threshold necessary for the generation of Supernovae.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernova

    Other evidence for the intrusional events from de Sitter space may be
    noted in the monopolar jets from quasars. These objects are four to five
    times larger than bipolar objects. Where the fluxional energetics of these
    variables is measured in millions of galaxies, it would appear plausible
    to assume that there is a unique source of energetics for these larger
    objects (i.e. de Sitter space) since there is a dichotomous distinction
    between Class I and Class II objects. (Burns, J. O.(1990) Chasing the
    monster's tail: new views of cosmic jets. Astronomy, (18) 8, 28-37) Recent
    observations in suppot this postulation are found in, Discovery of a
    bright quasar without a massive host galaxy (Magain, P. Letawe, G.,
    Courbin, F., Jablonka, P., Jahnke, K., Meylan, G., Wisotzki, l., (2005)
    7057, 437, pp. 381-384). Thus indicating that the enormous fluxional
    energetics of millions of galaxies over thousands of light-years extending
    for billions of years may have origin in de Sitter space or other similar
    energetic domain.

    We have received approximately a month's reprieve thanks to the excellent judgement of the great people of Switzerland. Where quantum tunnelling may occur to an exploding universe so through this same potential barrier which permits quantum tunnelling a breach in the potential barrier towards de
    Sitter space will initiate a Supernova. There is only one Supernova per civilization and all is lost.
    Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
    by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)

    The energy intensity at CERN is now testing the hypothesis that we are now at the threshold of breaching the potential barrier towards de Sitter space. Much greater increments in energy are anticpated at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN.

    "On the evening of Tuesday, 8 December, two bunches per beam circulated for the first time at 1.18 TeV for a short period and ATLAS recorded its first collisions at the record energy of 2.36 TeV (centre of mass)."

    Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
    by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)

    One of the mathematical understandings in modern cosmology is that
    De Sitter space is topologically covariant with the continuum at every
    point. Thus sufficiant energy from the Large Hadron Collider can
    penetrate the potential barier towards de Sitter space releasing the force
    of a Supernova. We are most deeply indebted to you for your kind
    interest and understanding in this matter

    We note also: in the CERN news bulletin
    "For the first time also, lead ions have arrived at the doorstep of the
    LHC." ESSAY , The Collider, The Particle and a Theory about Fate
    (The New York Times, Dennis Overbye) It may be anticipated that we can
    reset the cosmic timetable for our planet and a host of nearby stars back to the
    interstellar medium.

    A notice from the LHC administration for your interest. Please take what what action you deem
    necessary in this connection. All the children will thank you for your kind actions on their behalf.

    "The Latest from the LHC: Towards the big chill
    With 6 sectors out of 8 at nominal cryogenic temperature (1.9 K= about
    -271 C), the commissioning at the LHC is progressing well. According to
    the present schedule, the whole machine will be cold in about two weeks.

    Final operations to fill the nitrogen tanks for cooling the last sector to
    80K.
    Only Sectors 3-4 and 6-7 are still in the cooling phase (currently between
    60 and 20 K). As already mentioned in the previous update, as soon as a
    sector reaches the nominal cryogenic temperature, teams can start powering
    the magnets. At present, the current is flowing in the magnets of three
    sectors, while the remaining three will be powered in the coming two
    weeks."

    It may be intuitively more comprehensible to perceive the influx of energy as an electrical discharge since it would be the penetration of a potential barrier towards de Sitter space which releases the force of a Type Ia Supernova.

    As cited in the astrophysical literature, the energies resident in de Sitter space are vast enough to provide for the energies in a Type Ia Supernova.
    Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
    by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)

    It may be helpful to clarify the philosophical position and astrophysical
    energetics instrinsic to de Sitter space in the standard cosmological
    model in this postulation of transition from de Sitter space as generative
    of supernova in high-energy physics experimentation.

    A philosophical position may be cited from, G. W. F. Hegel (The philosophy
    of history, New York: Dover, 249, 1956) ..." there is no essential
    existence which does not manifest itself." The very large energies derived
    by Willem de Sitter for the equations describing the false vacuum of de
    Sitter space yield an energy density of 1.69 x 10^126 for eV (electron
    volts) per cm^3. (Gott, R. (1982) Creation of open universes from de
    Sitter space, Nature, 295, 304-307. In Waldrop. M.M., (1982) Bubbles upon
    the river of time, Science, 215, 4536, 1082-1083), the energy density of
    de Sitter space is given as: 5 x 10^31 kelvin and 3 x 10^93 grams per cm^3
    , converted to eV via e=mc^2 which is Albert Einstein's famous equation.
    This energy would then find expression in the observable universe. In the
    sense of this analysis, it would be quite unlikely that energies of this
    order of magnitude would remain hidden should a transition be formed in
    the potential barrier towards de Sitter space. This would serve as an
    immediate and ever present danger for the investigator and constitutes a
    public endangerment as well.

    This is based on the mainstream theory of universe formation by Professor
    R. Gott of Princeton University in which each bubble universe forms
    smoothly out of de Sitter space. A potentially infinite number of
    universes may form in de Sitter space. In a topological sense, de Sitter
    space is cobordant at each point with the continuum (our universe). De
    Sitter space is then prevented by a large potential barrier from forming
    an intrusional event into the continuum. The essential hypothesis of this
    formulation is that with sufficiently great energetics, a classical breach
    in the potential barrier towards de Siitter space will be formed thus
    releasing the force of Type Ia supernova upon the terrestrial ecosphere,
    the solar system and those nearby stars. These energies are from de Sitter
    space, therefore; the energies of the accelerator only serve as a trigger
    for their release.

    With sufficient energies, under this postulation, we discover that the
    accelerator is in the Einstein de Sitter universe, as it is now termed,
    and we have gone from particle physics as our governing theory to
    relativistic cosmology.

    Statistically speaking, Type Ia Supernovae are distinguished by having
    much greater luminosity at point of maximum light and they are of around
    1.40 solar masses or less and also show no presence of hydrogen at maximum
    light as well. Should this be caused via a transition towards de Sitter
    space then there should be no alteration of hydrogen towards calcium or
    other elements in deflagration of Supernova Type Ia. Other types of
    supernovae of I Types show presence of helium at time of maximum light.
    Should there be exemplars of greater mass levels for Type Ia supernovae
    this would again illustrate the artifical nature, e.g., high-energy
    physics experimentation generation of a transition towards de Sitter
    space. This indicates that CERN as an experimental configuration should generate a Type Ia Supernova thus supporting the work of Albert Einstein and the generalization of the Generalized Theory of Relativity
    by Willem de Sitter.

    http://www.google.com/search?pz=1&ne...tnmeta=searc
    h%3Dsearch=Search+the+Web

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_Ia_supernova

    http://www.space.com/scienceastronom..._atypical.html

    Please note there is now a limited time frame to bring this supernova generation to the attention of the director of CERN
    where the time of onset is now this November, 2009. May we offer our services to offer to present or debate the forthcoming destruction of our planet, our solar system and a host nearby stars via the generation of a Type Ia Supernova. Please contact at: dixon at hawaii.edu

    http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/

    Where there is no evidence of either helium or hydrogen at maximum light for Type Ia supernova this would further support the hypothesis of a transition towards de Sitter space. This is evidence of a statistical nature.

    http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1996PASJ...48...51S
    Title: Type-Ia Supernova SN 1995D in NGC 2962: Optical V, R, and I Band
    Photometry and Spectra, Sadakane, K., Yokoo, T., Arimoto, J.-I., Matsumoto, K., Honda, S., Tanabe, K., ,
    Journal: Publ. of the Astronomical Society of Japan, v.48, p.51-57.
    Bibliographic Code: 1996PASJ...48...51S

    It may be noted in this connection that there is no trace of hydrogen at maximum light for Supernovae Type Ia, which indicates that the companion star for this model is statistically unlikely since most stars are are of an hydrogen dominant order. This observation supports the the origin of these supernovae via a transtion towards de Sitter space or other highly energetic flux. Please note:

    The Golden Standard Type Ia Supernova 2005cf: Observations from the
    Ultraviolet to the Near-Infrared Wavebands
    Wang, X.; Li, W.; Filippenko, A. V.; Foley, R. J.; Kirshner, R. P.;
    Modjaz, M.; Bloom, J.; Brown, P. J.; Carter, D.; Friedman, A. S.; Gal-Yam,
    A.; Ganeshalingam, M.; Hicken, M.; Krisciunas, K.; Milne, P.; Silverman,
    J. M.; Suntzeff, N. B.; Wood-Vasey, W. M.; Cenko, S. B.; Challis, P.; Fox,
    D. B.; Kirkman, D.; Li, J. Z.; Li, T. P.; Malkan, M. A.; Moore, M. R.;
    Reitzel, D. B.; Rich, R. M.; Serduke, F. J. D.; Shang, R. C.; Steele, T.
    N.; Swift, B. J.; Tao, C.; Wong, D. S.; Zhang, S. N.

    For the generation of Type Ia supernova thermonuclear explosion explanations have been proposed, none of them have withstood modern testing.
    http://www.astrophysicsspectator.com...hermonuclear.h
    tml
    Thus the formation of a transnsition towards de Sitter space may be considereed as a viable alternative
    explanatory framework. Before we take the imprudent action of testing additional energies at CERN or yet again at the Fermi Nationional Acclerator Laboratory in Batavia, Illinois, more theoretical research should be employed to verify the safety of this research in highest-energy physics or all is lost.

    An educational presentation may be provided also:
    https://laulima.hawaii.edu/access/co...1010/Education
    Paul W. Dixon is responsible for this presentation, Copyright 2009 Paul W. Dixon.

    Consider the parameters for universe formation as being similar
    to that for Type Ia Supernova generation as being very small and
    vastly energetic. This may be philosophically difficult to comprehend
    yet essentially vital for survival!

    The parameter space of inflationary cosmology is seen in the estimate of chaotic expansion theory of the universe beginning at ~10^-43 seconds after the Big Bang, point origin of the Universe with total duration of expansion of 10^-35 seconds or thereabouts. Here the region of expansion no bigger than 10^-33 cm yielding with simultaneous inflations to reach the observable size of our Universe at l<~10^28 cm .. (Andrei Linde, Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology, La Tex Harwood, Chur, Switzerland, 1990, p39) Andrei Linde is the leading authority in this important work at the Department of Physics at Stanford University.
    http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-th/pdf/0503/0503203v1.pdf

    Should we consider the hypothesis of the uniformity of nature as predictive of the abundance of living forms with some of them attaining the capacity to
    transfer themselves to our location in the universe, what can account for their absence? We may note in this connection that there is only a short delay before a transition towards de Sitter space at CERN, Fermilab or other high-energy physics experimentation has generated a Type Ia Supernova as demonstrated in this thread. The frequency of Type Ia Supernova in the observable universe would then signal the termination of these technically advanced civilizations. A technical experimental mischance may then occur before the members of the respective civilizations are philosophically ready to accept this possibllity.

    The approach of the transition towards de Sitter space at Fermilab
    with the ongoing increase in luminoisty is seen:
    http://www.fnal.gov/pub/now/tevlum.html
    with these energies are now equivalent to those found at the point
    origin of the universe. i..e. "The Big Bang."

    We need to consider the increased evidence of water on Mars and the possibilty of water
    on other planetary bodies as the source of life as well as intelligent life thus supporting the hypothesis
    that other creatures much like ourselves can be a source of Type Ia Supernovae.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7919113.stm

    It is generally agreed that the the Large Hadron Collider will provide an
    empirical test for the formation of transition towards de Sitter space.
    The collisional energetcis are much greater that those tested in the
    Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Batavia Illinois.

    "The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is being built in a circular tunnel 27 km
    in circumference. The tunnel is buried around 50 to 175 m. underground. It
    straddles the Swiss and French borders on the outskirts of Geneva.

    The first beams were circulated successfully on 10th September 2008.
    ...fortunately on 19th September a serious fault developed damaging a
    number of superconducting magnets. The repair will require a long
    technical intervention which overlaps with the planned winter shutdown.
    The LHC beam will, therefore, not see beam again before September 2009.

    The LHC is designed to collide two counter rotating beams of protons or
    heavy ions. Proton-proton collisions are foreseen at an energy of 7 TeV
    per beam."

    The competing hypothesis which is considered even more objectionable than the transition towards de Sitter space is given in the False Vacuum solution to the Einstein de Sitter equations. Yet as can be seen in this formulation high-energy physics experimentation may serve as a trigger for this most untoward event.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_vacuum

    Please note in this regard that the transition towards de Sitter space is well-known in the cosmological literature. http://www.springerlink.com/content/p8377167602421t1/

    An affidavit regarding the contingency of a Type Ia Supernova has been submitted as part of the legal action to bring a moratorium against such an experimental mischance.
    http://dockets.justia.com/docket/cou...case_id-78717/
    Many thanks for the happy birthday wishes!!!

    With the additional energies available at the LHC in CERN, it may also be possible to test the competing hypothesis of forming a transition to the lower condition in the Einstein de Sitter Universe. Following the formation of this transition, our Universe would drain off into the lower energy condition. This should be of a lesser probabilty of occurence yet it is still considered as a possible outcome to this research.

    Please note: http://professordixon.blogspot.com

    The WORLD RECORD luminosity now employed at the accelerator (Please note:
    Accelerator Division Notification on the Fermilab Home Page) is 362.37 E30.
    In scientific notation, this 362.37 x 10 to the 30th power particle interactions. With a beam energy of 10 to the 11th power electron volts, we have then the energy of the current work at Fermilab set a 362.37 x 10 to the 41st power electron volts (362.37 E 41 eV). This is much greater than the largest energies seen on earth via cosmic ray interactions at 10 to the 19th power eV (E 19 eV). Without publicity regarding this most critical danger,
    a breach in the potential barrier may occur at any moment thus releasing
    the force of a supernova on our planet and solar system. We will thus have an intrusional event from de Sitter space in the Einstein de Sitter Universe
    as it is now termed. Your kind and generous action on behalf of all
    mankind is greatly needed at this critical juncture or all is lost and we
    shall all perish.

    Please note that the return flight of the Columbia shuttle was not halted because of the false belief that the the foam shards could not cause a life threatening defect in the aerodynamic properties of the shuttle.
    http://www.reuters.com/article/lates.../idUSN30568874

    As a fictional work, the novel Anathem remarks on scientists tinkering with what they do not understand. To quote from the journal Nature, "Anathem is a shrewd exploration of what might happen if the fear of scientists meddling with things they were never meant to know becomes entirely justified." with space-time itself included in the list of potential problem areas.
    (Jennifer Rahn, Imprisoned by intelligence, Neal Stephenson, Anathem, Opinion Nature, 456, 7221, 27 November 2008, 447-447)

    It may be noted in this connection that the term Anathem refers to an ecumenical curse of severe proportions. This may be understood to mean that we are expected to take extreme exception with predjudice to the work of those who would destroy us and our children through this meddling.

    Tycho Brahe's supernova, now identified as a Type Ia Supernova, shows those characteristics as predicted by the model expected in supernova from experimentation. A large Supernova has been generated leaving behind a type G star such as is found in our solar system. (Andrea Pastorello, Astrophysics, Echo from an ancient supernova, Nature 456, 7222, 4 December 2008, 587-589) The technique of light echoes was used for this identification of an historical object.

    As noted in Chang, J.,et al., An excess of cosmic ray electrons at energies of 300-800 GeV (Nature, 456, 7220, 20 November 2008, pp. 362-365) could be tapping into "muti-dimensional spaces with potenially important implications for our understanding of the Universe." Similarly, we may postulate that Type Ia supernovae are expressing the energetics of an n-dimensional space
    whose properties may be understood with further study.

    Please note that while the Type II Supernovae have origin in 10 or more solar mass objects Type Ia Supernovae have origin in objects of some 1 solar mass.
    It may be noted in this connection that the smaller massed Supernova give rise to deflagration of some 10 billion solar luminosities whilst the larger objects give rise to some 1 billion solar luminosity deflagration objects. This difference may lend support that the energetics of Type Ia Supernovae is created via an aperture formed towards de Sitter space. As also noted in this connection, there is no trace of hydrogen at maximum light for Type Ia Supernovae thus making it statistically unlikely that they have reached the Chandrssekhar limit by accretion from a nearby solar object.

    http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...ro/snovcn.html

    The formation of Type 1a Supernovae is dependent on them reaching the Chandrasekhar limit of greater than 1.4 solar mass to implode into a Supernova according to current theory.

    http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...ro/snovcn.html

    Yet there is evidence that the Type !a Supernova can form at one solar mass
    or less thus contradicting current theory and thus supporting the alternate theory where Type Ia Suoernovae may be formed via the formation of a transition towards de Sitter space.
    Probing Dark Energy with Supernovae
    by Sebastian Ihle
    9.6.2006

    As noted in our sciforums discussion, there are a number of competing hypotheses. An empirical investigation is under way at CERN in the LHC.
    Should we generate a Type Ia Supernova, this will confirm the existence of a
    highly energetic topologically cobordant continuum termed de Sitter space.
    So far, the astrophysical theoretical generalizations of the generalized theory of relativity have been confirmed at the 100% level. The world's largest experiment may yet create a tragic confirmatiion of Albert Einstein's theory.

    Please recall that the energies now proposed for the LHC at CERN will be some 7 times greater that those employed at FERMILAB. As is well-known, the energies in use at FERMILAB approximate those predicted for those found at the point origin of the Universe. Thus even from a Common Sense perspective we may penetrate the potential barrier towards de Sitter space
    thus releasing the force of Type Ia Supernova on our planet with the increaased energies to be employed at the LHC. Please note:

    Philosophy and Common Sense (Frances)

    "Not every philosophy professor takes philosophy seriously in the sense
    that she thinks that some purely philosophical theories that go against
    common sense have a good chance to be true. These philosophers respect
    anti-commonsensical theories, in that they admit such theories are very
    important in the pursuit of philosophical understanding. But they also
    think that there is no real chance that they are true. If you have a valid
    argument based not on scientific but purely philosophical reasoning, and
    that argument concludes with something against cross-cultural and timeless
    common sense, then at least one of the premises isnt true, or so they say.
    It might be tremendously difficult to identify the mistaken premise, but
    we can start our investigation off assuming that our assumption that the
    conclusion is false is safe. These philosophers take philosophising
    seriously, of course, but they dont take seriously the idea that purely
    philosophical (so not empirical, not mathematical) theories have a good
    chance at overthrowing parts of common sense."

    A videotaped presentation of this statement is under preparation. Link to this will be provided as soon as it is made ready. This should provide a more interesting source. We welcome any suggestions you may have in this connection for illustrative material. Please let us know what Malcolm Perry would indicate regarding the formation of a transition towards de Sitter space via highest-energy physics experimentation.

    Highest energy physics is an empirical science as noted below. We may then discover through experimentation the answer to our theoretical questions
    which are then derived from observation. Should the ongoing LHC at CERN produce the Higgs boson and field, this would then be a major victory for the Standatrard Model in Physics. Should we note the generation of a Type Ia Supernova, this will further confirm the current record of 100% successful predictions of the Generalized Theory of Relavity of Albert Einstein. These energies to be generated at CERN are those energy levels seen some 10^-9 - 10^-14 seconds subsequent to the point origin of the Universe. Experimentally we note that these energies are deemed sufficient for the testing of these hypotheses.

    Please access this webpage for a thorough update on the LHC at CERN.

    http://www.lhcdefense.org/

    Generation of Type Ia Supernova via a transition to de Sitter space may be added to this description as a consequence of highest energy physics experimentation.

    There has been a brief hiatus introduced from now until April or thereabouts for the reactivation of the LHC at CERN. We should consider all possible alternatives before this gravely irresponsible experiment begins anew.

    Please recall that the activation of the Large Hadron Collider at CERN is the onset of the largest highest-energy experiment so far extant on our planet.
    The empirical observation of a Type Ia Supernova will serve as another confirmation of the Generalized Theory of Albert Einstein. This theory, as noted below, has had 100% verifcation in other astrophysical observations.
    Let us not be so rash as to further test this theory and lose all that we hold most dear as a sacrifice to the ambitions of ruthless egoism and professional incompetence. We may discover the Higgs boson and field and yet create a perforation in the potential barrier towards de Sitter space and create a Supernova. The tentative date for the onset of the collisional actions at CERN is now around May 1, 2009.

    From the LHC Machine Outreach

    The LHC is designed to collide two counter rotating beams of protons or
    heavy ions. Proton-proton collisions are foreseen at an energy of 7 TeV
    per beam.

    The WORLD RECORD luminosity now employed per example at the US accelerator (Please note:
    Accelerator Division Notification on the Fermilab Home Page) is
    288.89E30.
    In scientific
    notation, this 288.89 x 10 to the 30th power particle interactions. With
    a beam energy of 10 to the 11th power electron volts, we have then the
    energy of the current work at Fermilab set a 288.89 x 10 to the 41st
    power
    electron volts (288.89 E 41 eV). This is much greater than the largest
    energies seen on earth via cosmic ray interactions at 10 to the 19th
    power eV (E 19 eV). Without publicity regarding this most critical danger,
    a breach in the potential barrier may occur at any moment thus releasing
    the force of a supernova on our planet and solar system. We will thus have an
    intrusional event from de Sitter space in the Einstein de Sitter Universe
    as it is now termed. Your kind and generous action on behalf of all
    mankind is greatly needed at this critical juncture or all is lost and we
    shall all perish as this undergoes a vast increment at CERN.

    As one of the seven plaintiffs in the District Court in Hawaii, may I offer a formal complaint agasinst Director of CERN Robert Aymar and to John Ellis chief theoretican of CERN to appear in the International Court in the Hague to answer charges of gross negligence in the operation of the Large Hadron Collider at CERN. As noted in this post, is the formal derivation of the generation of Type Ia Supernova from their experiment following the well-known work of Albert Einstein and his colleague Willem de Sitter in the generalized theory of relativity. The energies in nature do not approximate those found some 10^-9 to 10^-14 seconds subsequent to the Big Bang at the pont origin of the Universe without forming a transition towards de Sitter space as noted per exemplar in Type II supernovae and in quasars. Their willingness to proceed with this experiment with full knowledge of this potentiallity consititutes a criminal act of public endangerment. May we request that the good people of Switzerland discontinue power service to CERN until this matter has reached full legal disposition in the International Court in the Hague.

    May I add a personal note to this discussion. We should preserve the
    future for all mankind. Children have the right to grow-up in a safe and
    sheltered environment. We need to give our children the time to dream and
    grow into all future time. We should visit other planets, other stars, other
    galaxies to see and understand all things. Let us call for patience in
    this research endeavor until we are certain of the potential dangers that
    may lurk for the unsuspecting researcher. One Supernova will terminate all
    that we hold most dear.

    Update on the research progress at CERN.

    End of July: First particles may be injected, and the commissioning with
    beams and collisions will start.
    It is expected that it will take about 2 months to have first collisions
    at 10 TeV. Please note that only one area remains at below collisional
    energies.

    We shall now observe at CERN the onset of collisional energies at far
    greater impact than those observed at Fermilab.

    http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=...der-first-beam

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7512586.stm

    The Director General of CERN Robert Aymar as well as the safety officers
    of CERN have received the appended posting. We may hope that this message
    will alert them to the forthcoming generation of a Type Ia Supernova from
    the experimental highest-energy physics at CERN. So far, as the
    preparation for the LHC experiment continues, there has been no refutation
    of the theoretical work of Albert Einstein and the extension of his
    Generalized Theory of Relativity by Willem de Sitter. This forms the basis
    of our understanding of the Einstein de Sitter Universe as it is now
    termed. A review of the cosmological perspective is provided in the generation of Type Ia Supernova:
    http://professordixon.blogspot.com/


    Please note: Cool down at CERN is near completion as all segments are in
    the blue condition. Collisional energetics should now be observed shortly.
    May God have mercy on the souls of all our children.
    http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/

    As we are in engaged in an eschatological discourse, the "philosophy of
    last things," we need to distinguish between black hole generation as well
    as strangelets and Type Ia Supernova. Their generation and their effects
    are uncertain whilst Type Ia Supernova Generation is almost completely
    certain as are as any of the effects under the auspices of Albert
    Einstein's generalized theory of relativity. Please note: Dragging of
    Inertial Frames (Ignazio Ciufloni (2007) Nature 7158, 449, 41-53) Walter
    L. Wagner and I have discusssed this. Type Ia Supernova generation will be
    sudden and the destruction of our planet, our solar system and a host of
    nearby stars will follow. Should the CERN LHC (Large Hadron Collider) cool
    down schedule proceed as now planned, an empirical test of the hypothesis
    of Type Ia Supernova generation via highest energy physics experimentation
    will commence in June/July 2008. The 7 Tev phase of the research would
    then begin at this time. Please note: http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/
    cooldown progress in preparation of the empirical test of this hypotheisis
    at the LHC in CERN as noted above.

    Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
    by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)


    It may be helpful to clarify the philosophical position and astrophysical
    energetics instrinsic to de Sitter space in the standard cosmological
    model in this postulation of transition from de Sitter space as generative
    of supernova in high-energy physics experimentation.

    A philosophical position may be cited from, G. W. F. Hegel (The philosophy
    of history, New York: Dover, 249, 1956) ..." there is no essential
    existence which does not manifest itself." The very large energies derived
    by Willem de Sitter for the equations describing the false vacuum of de
    Sitter space yield an energy density of 1.69 x 10^126 for eV (electron
    volts) per cm^3. (Gott, R. (1982) Creation of open universes from de
    Sitter space, Nature, 295, 304-307. In Waldrop. M.M., (1982) Bubbles upon
    the river of time, Science, 215, 4536, 1082-1083), the energy density of
    de Sitter space is given as: 5 x 10^31 kelvin and 3 x 10^93 grams per cm^3
    , converted to eV via e=mc^2 which is Albert Einstein's famous equation.
    This energy would then find expression in the observable universe. In the
    sense of this analysis, it would be quite unlikely that energies of this
    order of magnitude would remain hidden should a transition be formed in
    the potential barrier towards de Sitter space. This would serve as an
    immediate and ever present danger for the investigator and constitutes a
    public endangerment as well.

    This is based on the mainstream theory of universe formation by Professor
    R. Gott of Princeton University in which each bubble universe forms
    smoothly out of de Sitter space. A potentially infinite number of
    universes may form in de Sitter space. In a topological sense, de Sitter
    space is cobordant at each point with the continuum (our universe). De
    Sitter space is then prevented by a large potential barrier from forming
    an intrusional event into the continuum. The essential hypothesis of this
    formulation is that with sufficiently great energetics, a classical breach
    in the potential barrier towards de Siitter space will be formed thus
    releasing the force of Type Ia supernova upon the terrestrial ecosphere,
    the solar system and those nearby stars. These energies are from de Sitter
    space, therefore; the energies of the accelerator only serve as a trigger
    for their release.

    With sufficient energies, under this postulation, we discover that the
    accelerator is in the Einstein de Sitter universe, as it is now termed,
    and we have gone from particle physics as our governing theory to
    relativistic cosmology.

    This supports of the theoretcal position that sufficient energy will penetrate the potential barrier towards de Sitter space thus releasing the force of an exploding Universe i.e., Supernova, on our planet. The works of Albert Einstein and Willem de Sitter as shown here have never been refuted.

    From the viewpoint of classical physics, the penetration towards de Sitter space is prevented by a large though not infinite potential barrier as described by Malcolm Perry. As the energies in the collliders go from 10^-9 seconds to 10^-14 seconds subsequent to the big bang at the point origin of the Universe, this penetrance becomes inevitable thus releasing the force of a Type Ia Supernova on our planet, solar system and host of nearby stars.

    All the children will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf.

    Yours sincerely,

    Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
    Supernova from Experimentation
     
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2010
  22. kurros Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    793
    I think maybe we should have a poll, to see how far through these posts people actually read. I personally don't get past the "SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION...".
     
  23. Billy T Use Sugar Cane Alcohol car Fuel Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,198
    One thing helps finding if there is any thing new:

    All the only half column wide text has previously apeared (and been refuted) dozens of times. Paul is exempt from the regular forum rules which get others banned for even modest reposting by copy and past of material that has been well refuted as false.
     

Share This Page