Strip mod status/ban WellCookedFetus

My god man you are thick-skulled.

Do you remember that a number of the posts you deleted there had no insults whatsover, and the ones that you claim did, I contend were completely supported. Do you remember how I clearly showed the difference between and insult and a supported assertion? You probably didn't understand it, so I guess I see why you have to ask stupid questions.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Excuse me? Be fucking specific. I didn't post anything in your mod thread. Tiassa was the only one to post in it. I did not tell you to be meaner.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

CounslerCoffee,

I was PM this, do you want a copy?

wesmorris,

I'm sorry but there is no reason for insulting language, so I deleted it, It also says in the rules: "given all the circumstances. However, in posting here you accept that the Moderators have the final say, and can moderate your posts for any reason they think fit. No arguments will be entered into regarding moderation."

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Well, good idea. Delete posts that aren't insults.

You don't get why they're pissed off, do you? You deleted an entire post. If I were you; I'd only edit it and leave a note as to why it was edited. You don't delete an entire post if it contains one insult. Or better yet, no insults--like how Wes claims.

 

WCF stated that all deleted posts were posted in a mod thread to be reviewed later. Is this true?

 

I did at first, but then wesmorris began complaining about it, anu to, all further deletions were marked as "off topic" as they were complaining about my moderating.

wesmorris,

No deleted post are visible to mods, there not moved to another thread.

 

I see no mod thread up for review in the moderator section.

 

So if WCF deletes the posts, they are gone forever?

 

You made a statement directly to the contrary earlier. Are you lying or just confused?

You posted that, so there must be some problem with semantics somewhere.

 

I see, I made the incorrect conclusion from coffee's comments that "archived" posts would appear in a "thread" for mods to see. My bad.

 

Thats not what I said, this is what I said:

Do you want visual proof that they are archived:
http://sciforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=3050&stc=1

 

god, what a fucking mutt

 

No. Mods who mod that section can still see them.

 

Invalid Attachment specified. If you followed a valid link, please notify the webmaster

 

WCF, maybe you should PM me some of those posts so that I can arrive at a decision and convince some of these people that what you did was right.

 

coffee was talking about another thread... oops sorry that's a secret, can't tell or they will hurt me

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

CounslerCoffee,

Alright, give me awhile.

 

I only ask that they aren't removed from their context.

 

how the hell am I suppose to do that? I have to pm your posts I can't just pm the whole thread uncensored, that simple out side of the vbulletins programing! at best I can tell him where they were placed on each page and he can interpolate.

wesmorris,

try again to veiw the image.

 

heh
the other monkey shows up. this mutt want to convince others that the fetus is right. he has not reviewed the posts. yet he plans on making a decision that the fetus is right

what a nut job

hey coffee
is it true you guys duh duh duh each other?

 

seems to me that he's attempting responsible mediation, while maintaining his affiliation with the mods. he's rightly giving fetus the benefit of the doubt.