Strip mod status/ban WellCookedFetus

Discussion in 'SF Open Government' started by Mr. Chips, Jul 14, 2004.

?

Should WellCookedFetus be removed as a moderator or banned?

Poll closed Jul 28, 2004.
  1. Nothing should be done.

    44.7%
  2. Strip him of moderator status only.

    12.8%
  3. Strip him of moderator status and ban him for a certain period of time.

    10.6%
  4. Ban him forever from participating at SciForums

    8.5%
  5. No opinion

    23.4%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Bells Staff Member

    Messages:
    23,606
    Hm?!? Sorry, couldn't resist.

    I don't know what complaints about two mods you were responding or referring to. I was merely responding to the issue in this particular thread and used an example. But alas it went awry somewhere along the way.

    I was not making a sweeping complaint and had I done so, it wouldn't have been a mere hint.
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Bells Staff Member

    Messages:
    23,606
    No idea. But I for one have had more than enough.

    And keep shakin those ta ta's

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. hotsexyangelprincess WMD Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    716
    this is kind of tiring since it will never be formal. If it actually mattered we could/would have created a court and an elected jury of 11, 1 non-bias, and 5 pro-con. Porf as judge. Actual thread, but it doesn't matter since we all keep bickering here. might as well move it to the cesspool. :m:
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Zero Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,355
    Exactly. WCF should be stripped and banned.

    Oh, and WCF? Just kill yourself already. You're already a hopeless case, and it'd be one less mouth to feed. Go on and commit suicide if you've got the guts. But you've been wimping it out for 9 months, or so you say, so you apparently don't. Go on. There's no one and nothing stopping you.

    You're worthless. You know that? You're better off dead by suicide than alive.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    Last edited: Jul 20, 2004
  8. Arditezza Banned Banned

    Messages:
    624
    Okay, that's amusing.

    You delete a one line post by me because I told it like it was?

    One question to whomever deleted it; why?

    It sat there for five days, and all the sudden, at someone's apparent illogical whim, it was wiped.

    If you guys are going to moderate, at least try to make sense.
     
  9. otheadp Banned Banned

    Messages:
    5,853
    WCF, i didn't know what to expect of you when you got the mod status, but you're doing a very good job so far. this including:

    1) not closing threads because you do'nt like someone's opinion
    2) actually being active and telling ppl why you close their thread or if they break the rules, unlike some mods who don't lift a finger when violators of forum rules violate them over and over
    3) i still haven't figured out "whose side you're on" which points to the fact that you really are impartial.

    having you as a mod is a big plus at sci. i only wish you were here when Proud Syrian and Whirlwind and AbdullahTheBomber were around cause i know you'd have banned their asses in a second unlike the other mods that kept letting those posters go on and on and on with their diatribe
     
  10. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    35,101
    Sometimes mods don't notice things for a while, Arditezza. Your post contravenes one of the site rules, so it was deleted. Accept it and move on.
     
  11. CounslerCoffee Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,997
    I never did that.

    I did this. But not with repeat offenders. And on occasion a PM was sent.

    You all don't know whose side I'm on. I am as impartial as WCF.

    Like I didn't try? If you had access to the mod section you'd know that I tried very hard to get those fuckers banned. Sorry, if I've taken your words in the wrong way.
     
  12. Arditezza Banned Banned

    Messages:
    624
    What rule was that, James R?

    Please enlighten us.

    Oh, and be sure to go through all the pages and delete all such posts as well while you are at it, you busy beaver you...
     
  13. Arditezza Banned Banned

    Messages:
    624
    Forum Rules

    Registration to this forum is free! We do insist that you abide by the rules and policies detailed below. If you agree to the terms, please check the 'I agree' checkbox and press the 'Register' button below. If you would like to cancel the registration, click here to return to the forums index.

    Although the administrators and moderators of sciforums.com will attempt to keep all objectionable messages off this forum, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the author, and neither the owners of sciforums.com, nor Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (developers of vBulletin) will be held responsible for the content of any message.

    By agreeing to these rules, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are obscene, vulgar, sexually-orientated, hateful, threatening, or otherwise violative of any laws.

    The owners of sciforums.com reserve the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason.
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    So what rule?
     
  14. spuriousmonkey Banned Banned

    Messages:
    24,066
    There are more rules than those.

    You can usually find them as a sticky thread.
     
  15. Arditezza Banned Banned

    Messages:
    624
    Well, I couldn't find any in this forum that pertained to what I posted.
     
  16. craterchains (Norval What will you know tomorrow? Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,044
    And now I must lament about the closing of the Little Green Square thread with out any notification of why.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Oh woe is me.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  17. spuriousmonkey Banned Banned

    Messages:
    24,066
    Look at other subforums and use your imagination.
     
  18. Kunax Sciforums:Reality not required Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,385
  19. Zero Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,355
    Arditezza. Admit that you're illiterate, please.

    They don't need to give a justification for deleting posts or threads.
     
  20. sargentlard Save the whales motherfucker Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,698
    Why the fuck is this travesty still going?
     
  21. ElectricFetus Sanity going, going, gone Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,523
    I feel like Bush, what a scandal and I did nothing... I just sat there like a idiot and listened to others. It was the CIA fault I tell you!
     
  22. otheadp Banned Banned

    Messages:
    5,853
    you were (are?) good too. you know why? because Whirlwind was so vocal about you being on his case

    now, whoever was had the power to ban those 3 stooges i mentioned and did not even try to ban them or close their threads when they posted nonsense, i am glad that mod is gone. hey, as far as i know he's still around being invisible and useless

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    WCF and CC (if you're still a mod), please, if you see trolling or or racist or blatantly violating sciforum's rules, don't be linient. if you don't enforce anything people will get a signal it's ok, will get into the habit, and influence others.
     
  23. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    35,101
    Arditezza:

    There is a rule which is applied fairly uniformly across sciforums, which says that posts which attack another poster rather than his or her argument may be edited or deleted. goofyfish noted this when he deleted your post.

    If that does not satisfy you, please refer to the explicit rule which allows moderators to edit your posts "for any reason whatsoever". Be thankful that moderators are invariably more circumspect than that statement allows.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page