STRENGTHS and WEAKNESSES of the THEORY OF RELATIVITY

Discussion in 'Alternative Theories' started by Asexperia, Aug 3, 2012.

  1. RJBeery Natural Philosopher Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,189
    When I read "the becoming" I think of "the Quickening" from Highlander. There can be only one!!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. RJBeery Natural Philosopher Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,189
    haha
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Asexperia Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,360
    According to our conceptual thinking the Newton's absolute time agrees with the regular becoming and the relative time agrees with the quantitative measurement of time (clocks). Newton didn’t refer himself to the irregular becoming.

    DURATION = DUALITY BECOMING-TIME (ABSOLUTE-RELATIVE)
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. AlexG Like nailing Jello to a tree Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,304
    Newton was wrong. He lived and worked in a low-energy, slow moving universe. His laws are simply an approximation which work well in a limited subset of reality, but are not applicable outside that limited realm.
     
  8. kaduseus melencolia I Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    213
    I wouldn't go quoting Heraclitus, there are only a few 'quotes' reportedly from him and even they are second/third hand.

    Also Newton wasn't wrong, he was perfectly correct for the observations of the day.
     
  9. Asexperia Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,360
    I have quoted Heraclitus and Newton, but they made ​​their contributions according to the time. Even now are not entirely wrong.

    Regards.

    Pending answer, please.
     
  10. AlphaNumeric Fully ionized Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,699
    The answer to my last post's question was "No" then. If you could at least have the decency to say it clearly rather than running around the houses that'd help discussion.
     
  11. Anew Life isn't a question. Banned

    Messages:
    461
    I wonder if by way of the invention of words there was a struggle between the word realativity and the word relativity........
    O, the relatives

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    heaha...........
     
  12. Asexperia Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,360
    OK, kaduseus is missing.

    I answer for him.
    The space is 3D, the time is 1D and the spacetime is 4D.
     
  13. Asexperia Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,360
    This is something personal, but I was attacked strongly and they wanted to take me to a mathematical plane.
     
  14. Asexperia Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,360
    GPS CLOCKS

    d = Δgt, x. The duration is equal to the gradual increase of time "t" since the moment x. x is the time to start to count the duration.

    If t is uniform, then d is periodic and precise. (clocks, Newton).

    If t is variable, then d is imprecise. (Einstein's Relativity).

    The relative time is not convenient to do measurements.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  15. AlexG Like nailing Jello to a tree Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,304
    GPS is a daily demonstration that Einstein, and not Newton, is correct. Newton is a good aproximation in a low-energy, slow moving invironment.
     
  16. Asexperia Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,360
    I respect your opinion, but what I say is that GPS clocks are not enough, we must synchronize them.

    In the Duality becoming-time (Duration) I consider both theories.
     
  17. AlexG Like nailing Jello to a tree Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,304
    :wtf:
     
  18. Asexperia Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,360
    :wtf:

    You mean Wisdom, Tenacity and Focus?

    Well, I'm going to bed. Good night.
     
  19. Asexperia Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,360
    THEORIES THAT COMPLEMENT TRUTH

    1 - Isaac Newton referred to a uniform rhythm time and never thought that this could vary, because
    in measuring the pattern should remain unchanged.

    2 - For Henri Bergson becoming, that he understood as duration, it is only subjective.

    3 - The Albert Einstein's Relativity focuses on the variable rhythm time, which many observers
    get different measures. Before time is the absolute becoming. Without the property of becoming no time.

    It follows that:

    DURATION = BECOMING-TIME DUALITY (ABSOLUTE-RELATIVE)
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 11, 2012
  20. AlphaNumeric Fully ionized Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,699
    You've now descended into incoherence. At least try to form cogent sentences.
     
  21. Asexperia Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,360
    How am I going to convince someone that puts before the incoherence to that I think.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 12, 2012
  22. Aqueous Id flat Earth skeptic Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,152
    No, Einstein says nothing about time having rhythm. It's simply relative from one inertial frame to another, to the degree set forth in the Lorentz transformation. GPS does not synchronize clocks in the manner you seem to think. The time dilation of a particular satellite is calibrated into the measurements, however. Geolocation is done by time difference of arrival (TDOA), which is in itself a relative measurement of a sort. George Washington, a surveyor, knew how to do this, by having two observers posted at different map coordinates with synchronized stop watches. They were to record the time at which any canon shots were heard. He knew he could draw a hyperbola on the map from their data (one parabola of which was discarded because it went inland and the canons were on board British ships).

    The key to getting accurate TDOA is (normally) to have perfectly synchronized clocks. Under the relativistic scenarios of the various satellite trajectories this is not physically possible. By accounting for the calculated time dilation during the differencing (subtraction) of one time of arrival from another, the hyperbola can be more accurately "drawn". A third satellite that emits a timestamped pulse - which is also corrected for relativity - is compared to either of the first two and a second hyperbola is "drawn. Where the hyperbolas intersect is where you are. A fourth fix clarifies it and refines it.

    You can't get anywhere denying relativity (if that is your intent) without claiming that GPS doesn't work. But that would be absurd. You know it works. Therefore, Einstein was correct.

    All of your rhetoric could be cut down to a few simple statements simply by restating the idea directly from Einstein, without the gloss and bluster. Or else simply explain GPS. In either case, we converge to the truth quicker, and much, much more reliably.
     
  23. AlphaNumeric Fully ionized Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,699
    Case in point....
     

Share This Page