What I stated is a well known fact. You know "E=mc^2"? Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
This means that an amount of mass (m) is equivalent in energy content to c<sup>2</sup> times that mass. Look up the difference between equivalent to and equal to. BTW, stars are not alive. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Interesting! So where does the distinction come from!? Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
No, the point is that we do not really know for sure what E really means, but we have a pretty good idea. Let's look at this: momentum = mass * velocity Given that the velocity is constant, is a hunk of matter, having mass, really just a big ball of momentum? My example is just pointing out that what an equation says does not tell us what it is made of.
Once again, my point proven. A form of it, yes. I question whether you make sense here... what do you mean with "what it is made of"?
No. A form, in the sense you are using it, means you can change one thing into another. You cannot change momentum into mass or mass into momentum. At least in your sentence design, you are arguing that mass is made of energy.,,, as you did say: A rock is energy. It is made of matter and matter is energy. You claim this just because we have the mass-energy equivalence E = mc<sup>2</sup)
I am arguing just to attack the logical structure of his or anyone's viewpoint. Feel free to comment on what I have to say, too.
Perhaps, but I do not really know what I am arguing. What am I arguing? I am just saying whatever is opposite or different from his claims and then back them up. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Oh. I thought you were arguing that TS was a shallow thinking, mush minded, helium sucking, delusionist. My mistake.