Star triangle paradox

Discussion in 'Astronomy, Exobiology, & Cosmology' started by Magical Realist, Jun 7, 2011.

  1. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    You just couldnt let it go, John. Play the game. So you would be untruthful, so what?
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    James, consider the page views.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,426
    Goodbye for another month, John99.

    Really, I'm surprised you think it is worth being banned over and over regarding a topic you so obviously don't understand.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. universaldistress Extravagantly Introverted ... Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,468
  8. Janus58 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,396
    The light isn't really "stopped" what happens is that the atoms absorb the photons (at which point the photon ceases to exist as such) and then when the atoms are triggered, they emit identical photons to the ones they absorbed.
     
  9. universaldistress Extravagantly Introverted ... Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,468
    Ceases to exist as such? What actually happens to the photons? What form do they take whilst stored?
     
  10. Janus58 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,396
    A higher energy state for the atom.
     
  11. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,426
    John99:

    Welcome back.

    Do you plan to respond to post #332?

    If not, please retract your claim that you can see light the instant it is emitted from an object (i.e. your claim that the speed of light is infinite).

    If there is no response or retraction from you within a reasonable time, I'll probably have to ban you again.
     
  12. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    Let me ask you who has this in their signature:

    "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." - Aristotle.

    Ask me specifically what you want me to answer.

    I aint joining any groups man. Because they can all go fuck themselves.
    What do you want me to answer?
     
  13. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    I just said everything we see is real time. Who is in the supernatural here me or you?

    So...prove it. should be easy.
     
  14. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,646
    Yep. And that's incorrect.
     
  15. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    So according to you everything is dependent on light. Why dont we just erase light and say everything is dependent on speed?
     
  16. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,426
    John99:

    I want you to answer the following questions, from post #332 - like I said:

    1. Suppose I am 300 metres away from you. You watch me clap my hands (from where you are). Do you think you will hear the sound of the clap instantaneously (i.e. at approximately the same time you see the clap)? Or will there be a delay before you hear the clap? (Bear in mind that the speed of sound in air is about 300 metres per second.)

    2. Going back to light, then, and given that the speed of light is about 300,000,000 metres per second, do you think that there might also be a delay between the time I clap my hands and the time you see the clap?

    3. The measured speed of light is 300,000,000 metres per second. How long does it take light to travel 1 metre, John99?

    That will do for a start.
     
  17. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    James,

    Can you prove that light travels 300,000,000 metres per second?

    You know what?

    Forget all the BS. You prove it to me right now.

    Under every circumstance i want you to qualify what you just said.

    Now yu are mixing up light and sound. OK...Does light have an echo? When we hear an echo is it 2, 3, 4, 5,..... instances or just the same sound. The two are not comparable james so forget that.
     
  18. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    Last edited: Sep 20, 2011
  19. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    And you're wrong.
    You haven't been able to provide a single shred of support for this claim.

    You. As usual.

    Prove YOUR claim.
     
  20. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,890
  21. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,646
    You can say whatever you like. Won't change the underlying physics.
     
  22. Motor Daddy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,425
    From your link:


    I've preached this many times. To take it a step further, in order for the speed of light to be constant in a vacuum, and light travel time to define the meter, the "second" must be an absolute!

    Distance and time are locked hand in hand, not to be contracted or dilated, respectively.

    BY DEFINITION, 1/299,792,458 of a second of light travel time IS 1 meter!
     
  23. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    Wrong.

    Also wrong.
     

Share This Page