SpuriousMonkey's Forum

Discussion in 'About the Members' started by shorty_37, Sep 9, 2007.

?

Do you think Sams Defending this Conduct is acceptable as a MOD here?

  1. Yes I do

    9 vote(s)
    52.9%
  2. No I do not

    6 vote(s)
    35.3%
  3. I am not sure

    2 vote(s)
    11.8%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    Last edited: Sep 10, 2007
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Bells Staff Member

    Messages:
    24,270
    I am sorry. You are assuming that I actually read the thread you mentioned and knew about it when the sockpuppet was supposedly created. Fact is, I tend not to read threads when the topic line does not interest me. I only went and checked it out after you started this thread.

    Not only did I not talk behind your back, I would have little to no interest in creating a character, specifically to have further contact with you.


    Yes. That's right.

    However this does not mean that she was in on it, or aware of it as it was happening. After reading through the thread in monkey's forum yesterday, I didn't even see where she participated. So you are accusing her of what again? Of knowing? What if she did not know? I sure as hell didn't. As I said, I tend not to read threads that really aren't that interesting.

    You admitted yourself you joined this forum merely to "fuck" with sandy and to abuse her. Hell it was in your first post here. So when some others decided to do the same to you, not by abusing you but by being nice to sandy.. that's what really got to you isn't it? That they were nice to sandy.

    As I said earlier. If the thread had been about sandy, you would have joined in and whined about her.

    As Sam and TDI have pointed out to you repeatedly, you're doing a great job of advertising their forum. At this rate, the greater majority are going to join monkey's forum just to read the thread in question. Well done.

    Get over yourself. From what I read in monkey's forum yesterday, they wanted to create a character to be friendly to sandy since you specifically joined to abuse her, something you admitted yourself. They said they did not want you to join their forum because they found you too negative. It is a private forum and they are allowed to pick and choose who they allow to join.

    And from looking at the dates in that particular thread, it had been dead since June before you revised it. So since that time, they haven't even bothered to think about you. So they had a bit of a whine amongst themselves about you a few months ago. So what? Get over it already. You're acting like a girl in high school who has just found out she is no longer popular. Grow up.

    Where is she accusing you of lying?

    And who gave him that right? Are you accusing her of giving him permission to do this? I didn't see that in that thread. Did you? From what I gathered yesterday, they had created a sockpuppet to be nice to sandy. It is telling that you deem that as somehow "fucking" with you. She admitted herself she didn't know until spurious PM'ed her about it afterwards. So unless you have specific proof of her involvement?.. Oh wait. You are only going on the assumption that she automatically knew since she is a member there as well. As she has pointed out to you many times and is fairly evident in that forum, it wasn't about you... you just came into the fray afterwards when they realised they did not want you to join their forum after they saw your behaviour on here and as Sam has said, she found out about it when the sockpuppet sent her a PM and told her that sandy was nice after all.

    Ya.. it's showing.
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. shorty_37 Go! Canada Go! Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,140
    One_RAVEN called it right on back then!



    “ Originally Posted by one_raven
    Doubtless.
    I called this yesterday.
    His/her language has changed completely in one day, his/her knowledge of uses has increased immensely, (s)he was talking about purchasing avatars yesterday, and today is linking to old threads...


    My bet is monkey or Satyr, so far. ”

    no kidding first he/she wanted to know how to get 20 posts
    and was begging absane to give them to him/ or her......

    It has learned alot in a couple days...

    Its all a pile of shit!
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. invert_nexus Ze do caixao Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,686
    Ok. So. The details of the 'experiment' weren't displayed in public. Therefore, we have only Sam's word stating that this 'Ersat' experiment was to be nice to Sandy not mean to Shorty.
    I suppose someone could also dig through Ersat's post history to determine the thrust of Ersat's general purpose. Or perhaps there is additional evidence elsewhere? I do seem to recall Spurious mentioning in other posts (although I don't have the slightest clue where) that Sandy wasn't so bad. It was probably as a result of the Ersat Affair that he came to this conclusion.)

    Personally, I'm believing Sam. I think that Spurious made Ersat to see what would happen if someone were *gasp* nice to Sandy (I wonder if he was a bootlicker or if he actually debated her? I don't wonder enough to go digging, of course...) I can see Shorty taking offense to this behavior and becoming quite strident thus giving Spurious a very poor opinion of her. It is to be remembered that Shorty did start her career here attacking Sandy.

    So. Unless further evidence is provided which can lead one to believe that the purpose of Ersat was to attack Shorty, then my conclusion is that Shorty's claims are without merit.

    I would suggest to Shorty that she do some detective work if she wishes to press her claims as so far she has done rather poorly in presenting any incriminating evidence.
     
  8. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    Amen.
     
  9. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    Would this help?



    http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=1439188&postcount=121
     
  10. shorty_37 Go! Canada Go! Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,140
    Oh Oli called it back then too....


    “ Originally Posted by ersatzscamp
    Oh dear, I see that I might have to lead by example. Of course I do not dislike anyone on this forum since I just got here. But here it goes:

    Dear sandy, that is a lovely avatar you have there. It makes me feel very pleasant. ”

    "Originally Posted by Oli"
    There's a few solutions here:

    you're someone's sock-puppet taking the piss
    you're going to leave
    you're going to end up as mad, sad and bad as the rest of us

    Other than that, have a nice day.

    Why? If I dislike someone (which I don't, by the way, I don't dislike ANYONE), why should I compliment them?

    “ Originally Posted by one_raven
    Doubtless.
    I called this yesterday.
    His/her language has changed completely in one day, his/her knowledge of uses has increased immensely, (s)he was talking about purchasing avatars yesterday, and today is linking to old threads...


    My bet is monkey or Satyr, so far.
     
    Last edited: Sep 10, 2007
  11. invert_nexus Ze do caixao Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,686
    Yeah.
    I figured "what the hell" and went through Ersatz's short post count and found nothing but respectful and polite behavior. Disgusting. Practically Zak-like. Servile.
    Ick.
    But, definitely not attacking Shorty.
    Shorty loses.
     
  12. redarmy11 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,658
  13. shorty_37 Go! Canada Go! Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,140
    Ok ok so lets just all assume from now on its okay to make sockpuppets
    to conduct our own experiments. We can use our knowledge of what gets under
    other members skins and use it against them.
     
  14. draqon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    35,006
    thats a huge image
     
  15. redarmy11 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,658
    There are smaller ones all around it, like tugs around a tanker. Did you miss those?
     
  16. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    I like the big one. I'm going to print it out for my lab.

    Btw, do you remember one you posted some time back with reference to the point? (ie "you are here" and some distance away, "the point") do you remember the link?
     
  17. invert_nexus Ze do caixao Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,686
    Make note that the Ersatzcamp sock puppet has been banned. This is SOP for this sort of thing. There was a time when sock puppets were not verboten, but since then (sometime around the kebab affair, if I recall correctly) it has been expressly stated by admin that sock puppets will be banned and if a user uses a sock puppet to circumvent a ban that both accounts will be banned.
    Spuriousmonkey is guilty of the former, not the latter. Thus, Ersatzcamp has been permanently banned and the rules are maintained.

    Satisfied?
     
  18. redarmy11 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,658
    Of course. I am your personal image-monkey:

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  19. Deathfromabove Hopeless and Useless Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    677
    It's not all bad, You gotta be pretty special for someone to create a sock puppet especially for you. I'm pretty slow is a sock puppet the same as a troll???
     
  20. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    Ta, lovie.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  21. invert_nexus Ze do caixao Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,686
    Then that would be Sandy. Not Shorty.
    And, apparently, yes, Sandy was very special.

    Sock puppets can be used to troll, yes. But not inextricably so.
     
  22. Bells Staff Member

    Messages:
    24,270
    This is getting ridiculous.

    An accusation was made that Sam was somehow complicit and so far no proof has been given to attest to this. She has repeatedly stated she was not aware of it until afterwards. I personally believe her. Having just read through the thread in monkey's forum again, there was nothing there about deliberately 'getting shorty'. And there was definately nothing there about Sam being somehow 'in on it'. Unless you have proof of this shorty, you pretty much have nothing. Being a member or a mod on that forum does not guarantee knowledge. Hell I was a member and I never read it until yesterday when you pointed it out in this forum.

    Refer to above. They probably banned you because you did the big 'no no' of advertising their forum on this forum. Monkey's forum has been quite explicit in saying that he does not want his forum to be connected to this particular one.

    And it is a private forum where they pick and choose who they allow membership to. It is his right to do whatever he wishes to any thread or post. What's your point? I've had posts deleted there before. You don't see me starting a thread here and whining about it do you?

    So being nice and polite to sandy is getting under your skin?

    Honestly shorty. Let it go. After having read through that thread in his forum, it is quite obvious that the sockpuppet was never about you. Save your dignity woman!
     
  23. shorty_37 Go! Canada Go! Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,140
    Why was the thread name in Spurious Monkey's site called "Shorty" then.
    With the experiment (you all know about) as stated. Why not OLI or MIKE
    or ONE_Raven or others that couldn't stand her? As you can see in the Ersat thread.......They all did not like her!
    Some ppl were even nastier to her then me. So why was the experiment soley
    for my purpose? Why was this not conducted before I even got to SCI FORUMS,
    because it seems the hate for Sandy started long before I got here.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page