Split: SAM's intellectual dishonesty and poor moderation

Sam why don't you go back to patrolling your Biology threads?
Could it be because they are DEAD? I wonder why hmmmmm....

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Yea, dream on.. I'll be banned before I can blink my eyes.
I think what you are doing is particularly childish... just give it up.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

I bet the EU would support me, champions of freedom of expression that they are.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Childish.. carry on hurting people, SAM. Your little games are more important.

 

I'm becoming more westernised.

 

Not really. You are becoming more of an pathetic idiot.

And who ever said being westernized is good ?

 

Same thing apparently
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/03/13/europe/EU-GEN-EU-Netherlands-Quran-Critic.php

 

I agree. But then most people are pathetic idiots, westerners or not.

 

Then it would appear that all of us should just learn to suck it up.

 

I agree.. do we have a deal ?

 

Sure, I'm ready to offend anyone and everyone. I personally never take offence.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Ok, then stop taking offense at stuff the US does in the ME for starters.

 

It does not offend me personally, just ethically.

 

So ? The Hitler avatar doesn't offend me personally either, just ethically.

 

Uh being offensive is not unethical.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Nothing more to say SAM ?

 

Let me suggest User CP> Edit Options> Visible Post Elements>Show avatars

 

I doubt Plazma would approve of that solution.

 

I doubt James R. the supermoderator would approve of your solution.

 

I said that. It is irrelevant, but the title of this thread makes her sounds bad.
I have met many intelligent people and many nice people but people who
are both nice and intelligent are rare, so I just wanted to add that because
that is a plus point of her. In sciforums, however, they are easier to find
(those who are both intelligent and nice).

About she doesn't possess intellect, hummm I disagree. She has by far the
highest post count and you can see the quality just by clicking her post history.
That could be something subjective, sure. Anyway, how can she be appointed
as moderator of biology & genetic, science & society, and formal debates? :shrug:

However, I completely agree with you that sciforums is place for contributing
intellectually interesting material. I can't contribute anything significant yet,
but I wanted to support SAM's moderation, especially because the women
moderator in this forum are already rare enough (only Sam and Bells, yes?).
Its good that we have them among forum leaders to represent me and other
women in this science forum.