We all know that abortion became legal in the U.S. through fraud. The woman wasn't raped, but that couldn't deter the laws from being invalidated. Later that woman pretended to feel regret for what happened, as they all do later... This culture of death that considers us to be expendable (misandry, anyone?) wants to justify genocide, with the argument there are many humans inhabiting this planet. It's funny, women adopt animals but never poor children. I guess it takes some effort to raise one alone without leeching from men or the government, and history has proven that women fail in all aspects of their pathetic lives (single mothers are not good influence). And what is the logic of abortion? If there is 50% of chance that a developing fetus is human, we are willing to commit an act that has 50% of chances of being a homicide. It is a moral decision that is always chosen without any certainty. Remember that it was never proven by the other side a fetus is not human (nevermind the fact that if women have rights to dispose of whatever is inside their body, so our banks should be allowed to burn our money invested there, since without men there would be no pregnancy, women by this logic are mere deposit safes and don't own 100% what's inside them - besides the right to self-mutilation not having been granted for anyone that wishes to do it, in this case only women, if we assume the fetus is not human); so the reasonable thing would be to preserve the life of the creature and discover later our efforts were in vain for a mere thing, or to kill it, and find out too late it was a human. Are we morally authorized to pull the trigger if we knew there is 50% of chances to kill an innocent creature? If we think the fetus is a thing, we are tossing a coin, choosing either heads or tails. For that reason alone, there is no hypothetical or real benefit that justifies the life of a human being to be gambled. Pro-abortion activists resent these arguments simply because the decision to commit an abortion precedes the very discussion. They only want to rely on them to justify the acts, that were already decided with or without such debates. These people would not concede they are wrong even if was proven the fetus is human, let alone moral evaluations of the risks involved. They want to risk doing it, even if the chances are 0%. It's a question of honour: I want to do it and you are oppressing me (there you go, victimhood again!), the hell with any logic. Again this is the irrational and crude wish to kill humans and value something else... I don't know, perhaps animals because they resemble women themselves? Animals only rely on the material world and their senses. They are not better than humans if you only consider their intelect. And yet no one sees this FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCE. Nowadays, animals are deemed equal or better than humans. When the fetuses are not killed, they survive to provide them later with material gain (as Esther Vilar would put it, "children taken as hostages") or validate their existences. Bottom line: These people are all incapable or unwilling to understand the notion of "species". Species is a bunch of common traits, inherent/inseparable, that defines individuals, once and for all, and this nature is shared by all of us. Belong to the same species, and I mean, all the time, even those who are not yet born, and when they are born if happen to have the same common traits. It's not hard to grasp that cats generated 2 centuries in the future, when they come to exist, will be cats, not apples. The desire to abort a child denies that notion. For all pro-abortion supporters, there are no inherent characters, but A SOCIAL CONVENTION that all people who are alive/already born can, as they wish, choose to apply to anyone that was not born YET. Whoever decides if the fetus belongs to mankind is A SOCIAL CONSENSUS, not the nature of things. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Can you see the level of mental confusion to believe in this idea? Sure it's not a mere confusion, but the chaos that derive from a very twisted, wretched mind. On rare occasions the supporters admit everything I mentioned, since it would become clear that, if being human is a social convention, we would have no guarantee that later this will not be revoked, denying the human condition of the feeble-minded, crippled, homossexuals, blacks, gypsies or whomever befits their agenda, and is inconvenient for the moment. Do you understand what is behind of all these seemingly innocuous patterns of behaviour? The irrational desire to have the authority to confer to whatever person they wish the status of human, animal, thing, whatever. Why shouldn't they be the judges of that, uh? Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! It does not surprise me that so many of these worms (most of them politics) are what I called embodiments of illusions. All their acts and emotions are faked and their capacity to commit evil deeds is incommensurable. Their agenda, is clear to me, is nothing more than spread their dysfunctions. Make no mistake, gentlemen, all these moral values and socially shaped behaviours are always imposed on each of us on a daily basis, and we are manipulated in so many ways that is astounding. To admit that everything they want is what I explained would be the same as displaying a badge saying "I am a socio/psychopath". But if their whole lives are lies, that will never happen, will it? Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! It's up to us to uncover all this BS that permeates our lives.