"Solving" Chess - Possible?

Discussion in 'Computer Science & Culture' started by Twine, Feb 17, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Twine Registered Senior Member

    Ah, sorry. I must have thought it was 10^3 somehow.

    I was using ultimately skilled to mean one that gives the determinable best move, and ultimately dumb to mean one that plays randomly. It wasn't meant to be a measure of how much I respect the AI's ability to play chess.

    The 10^30 wasn't my analysis.

    Makes sense. I'll leave the problem with the Hard Problem of consciousness, then.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement

    to hide all adverts.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page