Look, first you said that he spoke 3 words in that thread. Are you now saying that he was deleting and editing posts in it? I'd think that's just a tad more important than how many words he contributed and yet you made no mention of it. Perhaps you're just lucky that you don't disagree with him on anything substantial. Do you honestly believe that the posts he deleted of mine, one of which is posted verbatim in the thread I have shown you, merited deletion? If so, why? The implication apparently being that I don't. Do you have any evidence to back up this claim? In this case, it was more that Skinwalker rebuked me for a post I made because it branched from the original discussion somewhat. The irony was that he had branched in the same direction himself in a subsequent post. So when I point this out to him, he deletes it, allegedly because it was "off topic" in the religion forum. Here is the deleted post in its entirety, only not in the religion forum, where it was allegedly off topic, but here in SF Open Government, where it was 100% on topic in the thread I created, which was asking for clarification as to when moderators are entitled to delete posts: http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=2218628&postcount=2 The whole thing was unfair and, I felt, worthy of being examined by the public at large since the administration had already done nothing in regards to the first post he deleted. For posting the complete message, which was only allegedly off topic in the -original- forum it was posted in (the religion forum), I was almost banned. James said that I would be if I did it again. Again, this was completely unfair. I hope that some day I receive an apology, one from Skinwalker for the deletions, and one from James for his unfair judgements, but I won't be surprised if I don't get either.