Except your premise is blatantly false. Contrary to your assertion, Buddhism is a polytheistic religion. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polytheism#Buddhism_and_Shinto Well, here is the problem with that; words have meanings which have been codified in books called dictionaries. Religion is defined as believing in a higher supernatural power. Atheists do not believe in a higher power. They don't believe in a godhead. Therefore, by definition, atheism isn't a religion. What you are doing is repeating the right wing attempt to delegitimize atheism with a "they do it too" kind of argument. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/religion Unfortunately for you and your right wing fellows Wellwisher, we have dictionaries. Anthropogenic global warming isn't, by definition, a religion. It's a conclusion based upon overwhelming data spanning the course of centuries. Science isn't a religion. Man made global warming is no more a religion than is any other scientific conclusion like gravity. Again, this is just another right wing attempt to delegitimize science, because the evidence doesn't support right wing beliefs. Unfortunately for you and your right wing fellows, we have "dem" damn dictionaries. You cannot, by definition, have a godless religion. Well then you should have some evidence to support your belief, so let's see that evidence. Where is your evidence to support your assertion? You don't have any, because it isn't true. Science requires evidence, and that's a problem for folks like you because you never have any. Just because it says so in the Bible doesn't make it so. You need more than that. Evolution has been observed in nature and has been duplicated in labs. That's pretty hard evidence, and all you have is the Bible told me so. The fact is, if taken literally, the Bible is inconsistent with reality. This is nonsense.