Should Mars be terraformed?

Discussion in 'Astronomy, Exobiology, & Cosmology' started by draqon, Jul 7, 2008.

?

Should Mars be terraformed?

  1. We should not even venture into space...we should stay on Earth

    12.5%
  2. We should venture into space...Mars or not Mars...but later in 100 years or so

    9.4%
  3. We should venture into space in these 100 years but settle on the moon

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. We should venture into space before 2050, and colonize Mars

    9.4%
  5. We should venture into space as fast as we can and colonize Mars

    21.9%
  6. We should venture into space and colonize Mars and terraform it on a side

    6.3%
  7. We should explore space immedeately and terraform Mars right from the star

    6.3%
  8. We should terraform every habitat we visit, as long as it is in our power and as fast we can

    25.0%
  9. whatever NASA and space agencies decide...is were I stand

    3.1%
  10. other/none

    6.3%
  1. goose Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    158
    ya, here was where it was said... i actually dont know if this statement is true or not, i just made my account and dont know anyone.

    and before you bash me on how it says most likely a couple hundred of years... i know it says that
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. River Ape Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,152
    The idea of terraforming Mars is just plain bonkers. It's one of those ideas that comes from people who have been overexposed to scifi and have lost their grip on reality. It's only one step down from travelling through wormholes in space or making people immortal. Forget it!

    But if you can't forget it, produce a cost estimate.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. goose Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    158
    I never said we were going to... It would cost trillions of dollars and we couldnt ever get the money to afford it. What im basically saying is that it would be nice if we could do it.
    What i was saying earlier was only to show my view on saying that if we could afford it, and could in fact do it perfectly, then it should be first priority.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    No, because to live in a 100 years from now you have to survive first.

    We'll talk about that when it's possible

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  8. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    Of course it can be done in theory. And I don't mean make it like earth, but just habitable enough to grow plants on the surface for example, while we live in domes or underground.
     
  9. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    I saw a few programs on Discover or NGC in which scientists estimated that it could one day be done in a couple of hundred years, maybe in a shorter timespan.
    Of course this was in theory, not a practical estimation.
     
  10. goose Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    158
    But if you know that your not going to live at the end of the 100 years, wouldnt it make it just as important, and therefore just as important of priority as survival?

    Look at my later comment... your just repeating what i already said
     
  11. goose Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    158
    I thought that we were only talking in theory??? Im not saying as fact, i know its just theorized

    My comments may have been confusing before because i may have worded them wrong, my bad... But ya, i know its all theorized currently
     
  12. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    Ok

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    Draqon isn't talking theory..

    I don't remember the details though, sorry.
     
  13. goose Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    158
    the details from the Discovery show?
     
  14. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    I don't remember how they theorized it should be done. So yea from the Discovery show, although it could have been on NGC.
    It was some time ago..

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  15. goose Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    158
    Ya, im sure someone will talk about it eventually on here (im not saying your a lier by the way, i believe you

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    )

    Maybe blobrana knows more about it

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  16. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    Thanks.
    I'm admitting that I don't know the details so people can choose to ignore it.
    It's just something I remember, not an argument.
     
  17. goose Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    158
    ya, i know what you mean
     
  18. snake river rufus Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    855
    Wouldn't the first step need to be increasing the gravity to the point that a thicker atmosphere will remain? How would we do this? Green moss or lichens planted on the polar ice cap 'could' release oxygen and nitrogen but once that bleeds of into space/
    Personally I like the idea of terraforming, assuming that we learn enough to not make the mistakes we have on earth and that the technology to do so becomes possible.
     
  19. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    We need to pump massive amounts of greenhouse gases into Mars's atmosphere.
    Mars once had a thicker atmosphere and it stuck for quite a while..
    We may have to replenish it every few decades, or maybe only every couple of thousand years..

    Then we need to release blue green algae into it, again in massive amounts.
    If there's not enough water we'll need to add that to the planet's surface as well.
    Probably, after I couple a hundred years the atmosphere will be habitable for some plantlife.
     
  20. goose Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    158
    The problem is that you run into the problem of controlling gravity, which is so far out of our league that i doubt if people are even working on controlling it
     
    Last edited: Jul 10, 2008
  21. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    For what purpose ?
     
  22. goose Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    158
    i was replying to this part, forgot to quote
     
  23. snake river rufus Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    855
    mars also once had a molton core ( or so I've read) and a magntosphere. I agree that global warming is the answer for mars (and I suspect it always will be). Question, where are we going to get the massive amounts of greenhouse gases needed and how will we transport it there?
     

Share This Page