'Responses'. You missed an 's'. Not only do you need to better review your posts for inconsistencies, you also need to run a basic spell check. You are correct that I am not responding to every inane question you post. I started this thread with the intent of analyzing the causes of sexual harassment perpetrated by women, and what can be done to help minimize it. You have chosen to divert the conversation away from what was meant to be discussed, instead making it about nitpicks and your ego. I've attempted to bring this thread back on course by asking you why you think the women in the examples behaved the way they did. At first you claimed that alcohol was the cause. I disagreed, pointing out that not only was there a lack of evidence that alcohol was involved in either scenario, but also that alcohol alone could not cause sexual harassment. I also questioned why you didn't mention control issues or egotism, since you attributed these as the causes of sexual harassment perpetrated by men. After much probing, you admitted that sexual harassment was a 'complex' issue, although you refused to come right out and condemn women committing sexual harassment as being either egotistical or controlling. At this point you have yet to discuss what 'complex' reasons may compel some women to sexually harass men. However, I've given up on trying to get an honest answer out of you, as it's clear that you're going to skirt the issue indefinitely. So I'm not going to bother addressing you any more, and will devote my time to posters who have a genuine desire to discuss this topic. I'll let you have the last word though, as snide liberals love to get their last dig in, as well as control the narrative.