I find it interesting how orgasms had through sex are much more powerful than those had from masturbation. Sometimes, (and I know I'm not alone on this one) I will try and see how many times I can orgasm in a given time frame. The first orgasm I'll have is pretty sweet. Almost always the best one I will have that day. On a scale of 0-9, I'd say they're usually about a 3. But the further along my self-loving marathon I go, the lesser and lesser the intensity until by the 8th time or so I'm wondering if I orgasmed at all. However, when I'm having sex with a girl, it's different. The orgasms are waaaay more powerful. I'd say that the first orgasm I'd have would be about a 7 or 8. And the interesting thing, as I have more and more orgasms in a setting, they do not wane in intensity; in fact, they seem to get stronger. In fact, I think my last sex-derived orgasm was the strongest one I've ever had period (9). And it was my 6th one that night. Whereas if I were masturbating, I probably wouldn't have even noticed it at all. Obviously a lot of this is because the body is able to distinguish between masturbation and intercourse. But what I am interested in is how the brain knows this difference. I think a lot of it is because there is a lot more sensation involved with sex than masturbation. And I guess I'm interested in what those sensations and perceptions are (I'm sure some are more important than others.). Would it be possible to trick our bodies into having sex orgasms when we're actually just masturbating? If so I'm sure we'll be in for a new plethora of high-tech sex toys/porn/software to exploit this finding in the coming decades.
Here's another question. Do you think adding other dimensions of sensation (smell and taste) to pornography would increase the power of orgasms?
vasoline by the tub i see Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! i'm pretty sure it's a combination of orgasm, human touch (which is already a good feeling, even if non-sexual in nature), and maybe adrenaline, depending how often you entertain. plus, the responce (voice, sound, movement, feel, etc.) of your partner probably kicks things into overdrive, response that a web site simply just doesn't do. the substitute.. i dunno, watch The Sixth Day and be openminded i guess...
emotional attachment interacting with the ANS and furthermore several other neurological systems responsible for sensation and feedback loops will result in a more "flooding" experience.
The vagina has complex muscle contractions and a very specific chemical environment. I've said it in the past, masturbation is just a stupid imitation.
Perhaps I could take Crucifixor's argument a little deeper: would you consider "love" the thing that makes sex so sweet? Is it specific proteins (pheromones RonVolk) or is it something deeper in the brain? Certain connections of certain neurons? Something more? Perhaps there should be a test: masturbate thinking about someone you truly care about (in THAT kind of way) or if you're comfortable, with them around. How does it affect the experience?
Wings: I don't think love has anything to do with it. All that's needed is a woman. She doesn't even need to be attractive. She just needs all the necessary equipment.
Just goes to show that only part of an orgasm is physical. A person's experience of sex, of whatever kind, will vary immensely depending on his or her state of mind at the time.
But if the 'very specific chemical environment' of the vagina has anything to do with it, why would we [males] have sex orgasms when using condoms?
You should stay away from the little blue pills or you might have all 8 of those orgasms on a single hard on.Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! As to how intense they are can vary a lot depending on your state of mind, how far into a relationship you might be, how good the drugs you are using are, and at some point in your life the fantasies might be might be better than the real thing. Also, see my new topic at http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?115665-100-orgasms-per-day-are-pure-hell-for-this-woman Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Congratulations on winning today's Thread Necromancy Award. This discussion has been dormant for seven years. I don't think apendrapew is even around anymore. He probably had a heart attack. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
In all fairness, it's hard to tell when the date shows as white-on-white (new forum software feature). But anyhow, my Mom is headed over to apendrapew's house to slap him silly. Sinner! If not a heart attack, most likely blind by now.
I'm not sure how that happened. Usually something last posted 7 years ago, is so far down on the list I'll never see it. I do remember thinking it was a relatively recent post. But anyway if never to late to post to a topic, and who knows what will happen to it, when it's exposed to a new crop of posters.Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
