SciForums Ignorati

Who knows? Maybe he's right. Stranger things have happened.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

But I was referring to his philosophy not his discussion on elementary particles.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

WTF? All I do is take the opposite of solipsism. Solipsism is a form of skepticism which, and is exactly the opposite of everything I discuss on this forum. Skepticism claims that man cannot posses knowledge of anything which is a load of crap. Proof.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Point.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Oh, so you do not define everything as being originated from a thesis of your own mind and contradicting all other opinions outside it? You could have fooled me.

The opposite of skeptic is belief. Is that your position? You believe in all other positions?

 

Here I thought it was egomania all this time.

 

The oposite of skepticism which is the claim that man cannot possess knowledge of anything. Solipsism claims that man can only know that he exists, but cannot know anything else. I abide by the parameters of objective logic.

 

Objective logic is not the same thing as egomania. Are you sure you know what you're talking about?

 

Solipsism is the claim that a man can only know for sure that his own mind exists. I have never EVER seen a single claim from you that supports mainstream notions, which is why my opinion that you do not support mainstream notions of society, only those in your own mind. But, I apologise if I misrepresented you. I find your ideas quite intriguing, even if opposed to conventional theory. I especially liked your scivillage.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Thanks. My exhuberant feelings towards many mainstream notions doesn't imply solipsism in the slightest. If you want to know what this is like, try traveling back to 500BC, and dealing with all the mainstream notions they had about matters, and see if you agree with what they consider to be "common sense knowledge". There are many misconceptions in primitive societies that have yet to be apprehended. Including 2008. :itold:

It's not that I disagree with everything mainstream. I defend mainstream stuff all the time. I love the mainstream dearly. Especially the official government reports. Nothing more downright honest than that.

It's not solipsism because I don't abide by fallacies such as ad populum.

Yes that is what I said.

 

lol

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

I wonder if anyone here wants me amongst the ranks of the ignorati..

 

I doubt it. But I'm sure I'd receive a few nominations

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

I nominate jsispat from the earth forum.

 

People People...


All nominations must be accompanied by supporting evidence.

 

Ok, new nomination:

DeepThough.

For ample evidence, see the thread by JDawg (himself a hot contener for Ignorati membership) titled "SAM thinks blacks are dumber than whites" in SFOG, page 5 or 6.

 

http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=63288

The jury finds the defendant ignorant. Case closed.

 

Here's a few gems (get it? gems... earth forum... eh..) from that thread:

 

wow...just...wow

 

Don't put down the ignorati by including deepthought... He shoud be renamed cessed thought and only be allowed access to the cesspool.

 

lmfaoooo I concur.