sciforums continued

It's a bit pointless to close threads that deal with the future of sciforums. Are we supposed to wait till it is all fucked up?

I can already tell you where you are going wrong. You are not following a scientific approach.

1. First you identify the real problem. Not the symptoms.

1.a Identifying the problem is basically done by comparing what you have with what you want.

1.aa Needless to say you will have to define first what you want.

1.ab Then you start analyzing the current state of sciforums.

then we can start thinking of a policy.

(No, political correctness is not a policy since it implies no goal.)

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

And you are informed on what exactly we are doing how?
And yes, you are to wait till we have something to show.
Smaller groups are more efficient than a crowd of thousand voices and needs.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

The thread you are referring to was closed, because your forum colleagues spammed it into an off topic oblivion.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Tell us then? what is the problem? You can't homo.

 

Well, our conclusion is both simple and engenious,
we concluded that the main problem of Sciforums is spuriousmonkey.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

yeah...keep trolling homo. Tell us the problem.

 

the thread didn't need to be closed.
the off topic posts could have been deleted.

i'm anxious to hear about this new world order that's in the works.
i also agree with spurious when it comes to political correctness.

 

I'm with the PEOPLE.

 

The Moderator subforum is Private, please take that in mind.
You are invited to help us with ideas and insights, but we don't have to report to you. It slows us down and is not productive

The policy (well, the draft at least) has nothing to do with PC.

One of the main problems is the structure of Sciforums that divides people more than it is healthy.

 

You have to learn to take responsibility for your actions. If you trash the thread, the mods might not be very eager to clean up your shit.

 

how about a new skin?

 

No.

 

So you have no thoughts on what the problem is and you just came in this thread to flame.

I'm not surprised.

Or are moderators not allowed to have opinions? Is sciforums going to blow up if you identify the problem?


I'm with tablariddim and rottie.

 

If you have ideas and suggestions, and want to help, please do.
Otherwise you are just a noise maker.

Your personal life is none of my interest.

 

No, you are the noisemaker. You have said nothing. Just antagonized members here in this thread and other threads. Actions of a class A asshole (allowed according to the skinwalker rules).

My latest thread on this topic:

http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=67097

I'm certainly not going to spell out the real problem when having to deal with people like you who parade around like their shit doesn't stink because they happened to be a moderator.

My loyality lies with the spirit of sciforums, not with an administration.

 

Tell us what the problem is.

I accuse you of the worst offense possible on sciforums. You have the intention to change sciforums without thinking.

 

What spirit of sciforums, you ball buster.

 

And I will say nothing till we have finished our planning and published the policy.

 

You really have to look carefully nowadays to find it. It mostly follows tablariddim around like a puppy in love.

 

You won't say anything? Of course not. You don't know what the problem is.