# Scientific proof that God exists

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience Archive' started by voodoochile, Sep 12, 2008.

Not open for further replies.
1. ### voodoochileRegistered Senior Member

Messages:
234

I didnt set up the first test. I found them though. Then I set up the second test. I dont know how the mathematics were applied, I just used the test and found them. you need to talk to the science people for the specifics.

This was a new type of code. What was new about it was, it could travel.

Alpha male surprisingly.

thats the fool but he shouldnt even be mentioned. like i said, all he did was just sit there and annoy and interfere with everything.

2+2=5. can you prove any different?

3. ### voodoochileRegistered Senior Member

Messages:
234
you need to talk to the japanese cryptographer. write a letter to polyphony digital and ask them to tell you the details of how the code can travel.

5. ### lord_sylusRegistered Member

Messages:
49
My ‘you talk crap’ meter just hit 11 on a scale from 1 to 10, every time you are asked to prove anything you say we have to ask someone else, what you don’t realise is that we can’t ask them anything because they would laugh at us, because it didn’t happen!

New Code that could travel that you just happened to be able to make perfect, what a f****ing coincidence or a load of crap (ding ding level 12 om crap-o meter)

So predictable, that was a Japanese man with the same name but the actual CEO of polyphony digital is

Also the richest man in Japan

Every time you wright something on this forum you prove yourself wrong again and again

Can I prove differently to you that 2+2 does not equal 5… I’ll do my best with something you understand ok

1+1 = 2
1+2 = 3
1+3 = 1+1+2 = 1+1+1+1 = 2+2 = 4

And to speak in terms you would understand

If you have 2 apples and you by 1 apple you have 3 apples, if you by one more apple you have 4 apples, since you had 2 apples to start with and you bought 2 more apples 2 apples plus 2 apples equals 4 apples simply put 2 + 2 = 4

And the advanced mathematical proof that 2+2=4 can easily be found on the internet, but it is 20 or so pages long…

Here is a link for you, this is the longest proof for 2+2=4 back to an axiom! have fun disproving this

7. ### lord_sylusRegistered Member

Messages:
49
O yes because they are going to give it to a bunch of people who listend to you :shrug:

well if they actualy did hier you then maby it might work because then thay are as dumb as you

8. ### lord_sylusRegistered Member

Messages:
49
Notice a few things about this quote, one they are talking about the physics engine you refer to! second it wasn't poblished by Sony or someone else out of that comunity...

There is one part of this quote i want you to look closely at...

If I had a physics engine that accurately predicted the real world i would use it in a product to make money, even if it means putting it in a Game!

The only programs that Polyphony digital has ever produced have been used for Grand Tourismo why would they stop now!

Here is their list of releases from their own website!

here is another one from another place proving that the physics engine can't predict the real world 100%

once again if i had the technologie to make it seem Reel, i would, it would make me more money!!!!!!!!

9. ### OliHeute der Enteteich...Registered Senior Member

Messages:
11,888
Code does NOT travel.

Crytographers don't work on that sort of code.
More evidence of your lack of knowledge.

If you can't provide absolute proof of that then you are a liar rather than merely deluded.
Hawking working on a physics model for a car?
You've gotta be completely out of your tree.

10. ### lord_sylusRegistered Member

Messages:
49
My god i completely blocked out that bit about stephan hawking... i had to go back and read it again... even if you write some code down i wouldn't believe you after that comment!

11. ### StryderKeeper of "good" ideas.Valued Senior Member

Messages:
13,101
I think this thread should be convert to a:

"Who's Sockpuppet are you?" contest, where contestants have to try and guess who the OP really is. I've given the shadow of doubt but I'm pretty sure that this poster is beyond your usual nut, probably doing one of those boardwar jibs where they prattle on over here about some pet nut theory to prove to the world how Sciforums members react, interact and behave when a nut jumps into conversation.

I'm not offering any prizes (Since I actually don't really know who's sock it is) however there has been speculation as to whom the sock is.... Write your answers on a postcard with your Tiebreaker sentence of no more than 20 words, to:...

12. ### Crunchy CatF-in' *meow* baby!!!Valued Senior Member

Messages:
8,423
Oooh ooh, I think it's spuriousmonkey. Consequently, I think that wolv1 fella' who has been trolling physics is nikelodeon.

13. ### voodoochileRegistered Senior Member

Messages:
234
Dont be afraid to ask them.

I think you need to look into the way binary code can be felt through the physical medieum of an electronic steering wheel. This practice is what you need to understand and its been around for many years.

I do not know who that old dude is. The other picture is the fool I'm talking about.

They are both rich.

Nobody has proved me wrong.

No way. 2+2=5

great. you have typed a lot. are you going to do anyuthing about it? you could have spent that time writing a letter to polyphony digital. the people who are steaing from you, your just too unevolved to believe it.

14. ### voodoochileRegistered Senior Member

Messages:
234
You have to believe I'm telling the truth. Bearing this in mind, the code really is God's image. God is equal to everyone. No one person has any more right to the code than anybody else. If one person owns it everybody owns it. So yes, they will give it to you, but they will try to hang on to it like shit on a stick, so you force the thieves.

I'm dumb if I'm wrong and I'm not wrong.

15. ### voodoochileRegistered Senior Member

Messages:
234
Your wasting an astonishing amount of energy. They cant make the model or system of inertia work, so you are right. This is the process that makes it happen.

Use all this energy to do something constructive.

16. ### voodoochileRegistered Senior Member

Messages:
234
Lots of people are stuck on the code travelling. The idea of this physics engine is to design a model that will make the steering wheel react like real life. The code will make the wheel move by itself, just like in real life. The code feels and has the power to move the wheel.

This practice was evolved by the japanese cryptographer and myself.

He was a general numbers person. I dont have a specific title. Ask polyphony digital.

Mathematics travelling at C will attract scientists from all around. A physicist, any physicist, will bend over backwards for this code. Stephen Hawking was contacted by polyphony digital after I brought the code to C. This time last year.

17. ### voodoochileRegistered Senior Member

Messages:
234
Yamauchi needed physicists to deal with this new technology. You would hire the best you could right? Yamauchi could afford to hire him and any physicist would realise how important this progress is.

I didnt want to name individuals names. Thats why I waited 6 months.

18. ### voodoochileRegistered Senior Member

Messages:
234
I have done everything I can for 6 months. I have done my best to relate everything. I am now sick of waiting which is why I'm naming names.

Kazonori Yamuchi, and all polyphony digital employees.
Honda and in particular, Mr Honda.
Mazda executives
Toyota exectutives
Nissan exectutives
Mitsubishi exectutives
Stephen Hawking
Jeremy Clarkson
and some others who are connected to polyphony digital.

Shut me up.

Messages:
5,874

Messages:
4,955

Messages:
84
22. ### voodoochileRegistered Senior Member

Messages:
234
for the 3 people with the pictures, you could have spent that time doing something constructive.

23. ### SkinWalkerArchaeology / AnthropologyModerator

Messages:
5,874
Humor is always constructive. You saved us the time and trouble of starting a separate thread.