SAM Says Blacks are Dumber Than Whites

Discussion in 'SF Open Government' started by Balerion, Dec 6, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Trippy ALEA IACTA EST Staff Member

    Messages:
    10,890
    Congratulations on misrepresenting my post, well done.

    I didn't state which groups in Africa, and for you to try and represent my post as such is blatantly dishonest of you.

    I couold just as easily play spot the difference with a Himba child and an Egyptian child (they are physically, quite different in apperance) but I wont.



    BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZT!
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. DeepThought Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1,461

    You stupid retard.

    Africa is a continent, a geographical area.

    Not a fucking race.

    There is no such thing as the 'African gene pool'.
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. DeepThought Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1,461

    How easily your intellectual pretenses are exposed.

    You cannot prove, through your own reasoning, the genetic variations of which you speak, yet your whole argument depends upon them.

    I put you on the spot and you failed miserably.

    You are nothing but a reader of science magazines and popular books, an upholder of the status quo, a Catholic deacon ready to smother over any claims of child abuse to keep the peace.

    As a typical defense mechanism, you accuse me of cheating.

    What an original thinker you are.
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Bells Staff Member

    Messages:
    22,959
    Oh for God's sake, do some research before blabbing DT. Honestly, you are beginning to sound even more foolish in your desperation.

     
  8. Bells Staff Member

    Messages:
    22,959
    At least he has a clue instead of pulling stuff out of his arse and attempting to pass it off as being the truth or somehow correct, even though science has proven you to be wrong.

    My advice to you DT is to take the loss and skulk away.
     
  9. DeepThought Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1,461
    Perhaps you would care to explain - according to the current evolutionary theory in vogue, which I believe liberals like yourself subscribe to - how it is that humans migrated out of Africa, experienced changes in their DNA (evolution) as they adapted to the environment, and ended up being more similar than the populations they left behind?

    Perhaps you would also care to explain the presence of racial characteristics in primates which echo human races? I know you dismissed that one on the other thread, but that really is the salvo which sinks all arguments concerning humans being originally black.

    Furthermore, from your article:


    What is this? Probably?

    You mean they can't prove it?

    What is this 3.8% difference of something they cannot even prove worth?

    Thanks Bells, another piece of popular science designed to encourage racial integration.
     
    Last edited: Dec 16, 2008
  10. Bells Staff Member

    Messages:
    22,959
    This is getting painful.

     
  11. LogicTech Registered Member

    Messages:
    119
    Now are you convinced that RetardedThought is, well, retarded?

    I've dealt with guys like him before, there is no getting through to them no matter how good your sources....



    Oh well, there's no point in helping a lost cause. Can't say we've tried though.
     
  12. DeepThought Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1,461

    Bells, I repeat the question, since you have not attempted to answer it:

    How it is that humans migrated out of Africa, experienced changes in their DNA (evolution) as they adapted to the environment, and ended up being more similar than the populations they left behind?

    Hopefully I won't have to ask a third time.
     
  13. Bells Staff Member

    Messages:
    22,959
    Read the article of the link I posted in my previous post.

    Trippy alluded to it in an earlier post. Your question had been answered before you even posed it.

    I'll even give you a hint:

    Isolation by distance is the norm in human populations because humans do not mate at random; individuals living in the same geographic region and sharing a language are more likely to mate with each other than with individuals from more distant regions. Therefore, due to the process of genetic drift, populations have differentiated over time. Genetic isolation of ethnic groups is reinforced by assortative mating (the tendency for individuals with phenotypic resemblance to mate with each other) and localized endogamy based on sociocultural factors such as language and ethnicity. Because we have greater mobility today, distance is not as great a barrier, and as sociocultural barriers against interethnic marriages are decreasing, admixture is becoming increasingly common.
     
  14. DeepThought Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1,461

    :roflmao:

    Bells,

    Why can't I get a straight answer out of you?

    Lets break it down:

    Do you believe that humans originally migrated out of Africa and underwent evolutionary modifications as they were naturally selected for the environments they encountered?

    This is the current theory and I simply want to know whether you agree with it or not.

    (Your excerpt above only mentions genetic drift and then some sociological crap about who prefers to mate with whom. Because it goes on to say what a wonderful thing multi racial societies are excuse me but I smell a whole heap of bullshit.)
     
  15. LogicTech Registered Member

    Messages:
    119
    We already know so. They migrated out of Africa around 60,000 years ago.

    Why, do YOU believe we migrated out of Africa or not?
     
  16. Bells Staff Member

    Messages:
    22,959
    I would have thought the answer to that question was painfully obvious. I guess not. I guess you need things explained to you in detail.

    The wonderful thing about multiracial societies is that it provides a wider gene pool.. more diversity.. And that is a good thing.. And here's why:

    Now you are free to see it as being "bullshit". But maybe you consider it superior to continue inbreeding instead of diversity. Keeping it all in the family I guess, including all the diseases that exist within your gene pool.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  17. DeepThought Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1,461

    I knew it of course, I just wanted confirmation.

    If you accepted the current theory with regards to the cause of racial variations within humans then you would have to accept that adaptations to the environment are the positive responses of an organism to threats to its survival which allow it to overcome these obstacles and go on.

    So one of those currently in vogue would be paler skin enabling easier synthesis of vitamin D which is an advantage in less sunnier climes and so this is why you find the proliferation of paler skinned humans in the north.

    But, now you are telling us that pale skin is not actually a positive physical characteristic at all but the result of inbreeding and that the only way to correct this is for white people to breed with blacks?

    Your about as subtle as a sledge hammer Bells.

    Amazingly, considering white people have been the most successful ethnic group in human history, inbreeding would appear to have bought with it a lot of benefits. Lets not even get in into the subject of Ashkenazi Jews whose inbreeding is legendary and successes equally so.

    It appears both Newton and Einstein were the result of inbreeding. So, for that matter, are all the great scientists who make up the entire history of Western science going back to the Greeks, and further if my calculations are correct.

    There's no doubt about it Bells, your in a pretty pickle for sure.

    Most of the moderators on this forum will need to be cross bred with black Africans, and science itself must become a matter of feet stamping, wild dancing and loud ululations around a fire as we summon our ancestors to explain the world about us.
     
  18. LogicTech Registered Member

    Messages:
    119
    So, RetardedThought, what are your thoughts on Nazism or Eugenics? I guess they were just attempts to "improve" the race of the human species, weren't they? Just ensuring that the best race won out, huh....


    EDIT: Can someone just move this and RetardedThought to the Cesspool now?
     
  19. Bells Staff Member

    Messages:
    22,959
    And also an increase in skin cancer. But hey, that can be combated with slapping on a liberal dose of sunscreen.. which then unfortunately prevents the "synthesis of vitamin D".. A benefit that has its own detrimental issues.

    Where did I say that? What a wild little imagination you seem to have.

    And you are as imaginative as my 3 year old. Go figure.

    And?

    Don't you get it yet? We are all the result of inbreeding on some level. What has been discovered is that there is lack of diversity or the reduction of diversity in those who migrated out of Africa. Ergo, diseases that have a genetic origin tend to stay within particular groups who have not mated outside of their groups.. ergo.. less diversity can have a negative impact on the population.

    And?

    Refer to above.

    How so?

    Arsehat. I am a descendant of cross breeding with black Africans. And no, I do not partake in 'feet stamping, wild dancing and loud ululations around a fire, nor do I try to summon my ancestors to explain the world to me'. My 3 year old and 1.5 year old sometimes stamp their feet (tantrums), dance wildly with their arms in the air and scream incoherently (usually while watching The Wiggles), but has probably more to do with their respective ages (since children that age do tend to do that, regardless of race).

    But thank you for reiterating what I always thought about you.. an uninformed and racist prat who seems to think that being white is a sign of superiority. While you may think the lack of melanin in your skin is a sign of superiority, your self imposed superiority is far outweighed by the very simple fact that you are a gormless fool.
     
  20. Trippy ALEA IACTA EST Staff Member

    Messages:
    10,890
    Think about it for a minute. I know stopping to think isn't exactly your strong point, but try it, just for once, you might actually enjoy it.

    The people of a Geographical area have a total gene pool.

    Thus it's correct to talk about the African Gene pool.
    It's also correct to talk about the European Gene Pool, the North American Gene pool, even the Scandanavian Gene pool, the British Gene pool, you could even, if you so desired, talk about the English Gene pool.

    While Africa is the name of a Geographical area, African is the name of the people that inhabit that area.
     
  21. Trippy ALEA IACTA EST Staff Member

    Messages:
    10,890
    Liar. I've made my pretenses abundantly clear - that this thread is really about CHocolate causing car accidents.

    Liar. Simply examining the Wiki page on the Hutu (or is it the Tutsi, I don't recall) would provide you with the basics of some of what i'm talking about/alluding to

    No you didn't, you tried to put me on the spot, and you failed miserably.

    This is the typical response I get from people like you. The accusations of narrowmindedness and such. The simple fact of the matter is you don't actually know what you're talking about, you think that your ignorance makes you correct. You think that if you wish hard enough, you'll be right. Guess what, you wont. Your posts are typical of this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning-Kruger_effect

    Typical defense mechanism. I point out a flaw in your argument that's based on a logical fallacy and you resort to abuse.

    Why thankyou.
     
  22. Trippy ALEA IACTA EST Staff Member

    Messages:
    10,890
    A perfect example being the genetic trait of whether or not your urine stinks after eating asparagus (and the ability to notice that smell).

    The trait is only present in something like 9% of the population in the UK, but is present in something like 70% of the population in the US.

    There are plenty of similar examples.
     
  23. Trippy ALEA IACTA EST Staff Member

    Messages:
    10,890
    No it doesn't, it simply says it's becoming increasingly common.

    Are you suggesting instead that your genetic Heritage is that of Neanderthaal?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page