Rules concerning what constitutes a personal attack are too vague

As for it being a tactic to see whether I could remain calm... I remained calm. It's Read Only that was coming across as the loony with writing in capitol letters and intentionally distorting what I said.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Sweet Jesus!! Capitol Letters? Oh, the humanity...:bawl:

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

I think given your frequent claims about space aliens harassing people here, demands that mods "rectify misinformation and propaganda" are unwise. People who live in glass houses and all that.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Your moral high ground on the subject isn't as important as you think. I know my place, my task when I post in the UFO forum. I know the rules.

That isn't meant to mean, my opinion about the behaviour of some people cannot be called into question in other sub-forums. My opinion on the UFO phenomenon shouldn't mean diddly squat about how the science is run at the site. You trying to use that as some sort of defence for either you or others, is just low.

 

Mod Hat — Concurrence and closure

Mod Hat — Concurrence and closure

Seconded, with the added note that we probably should have locked this thread down in '09 after we banned the pedophile.

Members should be aware that this is not one of those times when we're going to crash down on you for opening a new thread on the rules after closing this one.

Whatever we should have done way back then, we're putting this to rest for necromancy.