Hello, We may usually bounce on Belief, Skepticism & Science issues. Let us try to better understand these so that our discussions can be more meaningful. At one site skepticism is described as under which probably be the description of "Rational Skepticism": I think, it is common understanding that neither Belief (religion, alternative systems, logics, philosophy etc.) nor Scientific understandings(Modern med. etc.) are absolute and final (a&f). Hence, in view of above description of skepticism, should skeptics not raise issues also for scientific understandings in same manner as they raise for non-scientific systems to justify "Rational Skepticism"? If not, that may just be due to odd perception i.e. positive for one and negative for. Best wishes.