Rape: The Megathread

I'm sorry, I can't find your "dummies version" of the answers to these questions, please enlighten me.


These would be the questions...

Thanks...

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

What? I mean, what?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

You must be kidding, James?

I also resent how that feminist copypasta implies that those tactics are only used by men to 'rape' women.

 

Why don't you woman up, stop posting on the net and go cook your man a big steak with mushrooms while he watches the game? Don't forget to spread your legs like a good little housewife for him afterwards.

 

Funny that sexists such as yourself don't seem to want to ban members who advocate violence against males?

Funny that sexists such as yourself don't seem to want to ban members who proudly flaunt double standards?

 

It is also funny that sexist idiots can't seem to tell the difference between geniune sexism (ie orelander) and someone using satire to point out the gross sexism of another (ie lepustimidus).

 

http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=1918609&postcount=65

The material that was quoted in this post is clearly advocating violence, but it isn't as if you give a shit. Instead you'd rather keep in line with the other sexists.

 

I find it strange that so many liberals seem to be too stupid to understand that in the vast majority of those cases listed in the OP there was no talk of consent, just pushing the feminist mantra that all men are rapists. In fact, quite a few of them talk about getting consent and still being a rapist.

Though I'm sure that you'd agree that if a girl explicitly gives you consent to sex that you are in fact a rapist.

 

Randwolf unfortunatly no i dont rember which state they were inacted in (or if they were in all states) and i dont have the time to trall through 8 sets of criminal law to find them (thats assuming its writen into the crimes acts). I will TRY to find it latter though

That being said it has apsolutly nothing to do with this, they were inacted because of drink spiking and a case on a cruise ship under the juristiction of the NSW justice system.

The case involved, a women (Dianne Brimble) who was given the date rape drug GHB against her concent, this group of men then procided to rape her and left her to die of an overdose. This lead to outrage (which i agree with BTW) which lead to a change in legislation both to specifically make food and drink tampering a criminal act (even putting an extra shoot into a drink without the persons permission is a crime) AND to alter the laws relating to sexual concent.

The drink spiking laws just out of interest dont discriminate either. So putting pure vodca into the beer the groom is drinking at a bucks night is a criminal act

 

I find it scary. And more than a bit disturbing. Who wants to run into those guys at a party?
If my daughter was drunk at a party, could I count on them to make sure she got safely home or would they see this as an opportunity to 'have a bit of fun'.

 

found it

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Thanks, Asguard. I was just curious, don't fret over it, if it's not readily available that's cool..

This was my main question, so thank you again for answering...

As you should, IMHO. I'm not sure though, should a person face criminal consequenses for "even putting an extra shoot into a drink without the persons permission"? I mean, it's definitely not a good idea, and not something I would condone, but are they really going to prosecute people for adding an extra shot to someone's drink?

This is good - Australia is very progressive. Maybe the rest of the world could learn something. I hope it is not "selectively" enforced, because here in the U.S. women who spike a mans drink with G are mostly joked about. This happened to a friend of mine, admittedly, there was no sexual assault, but the authorities seemed to find it humourous. In any event, thanks again...

 

umm orleander, i think you should read part d) "or under any other mistaken belief about the nature of the act induced by fraudulent means"

Ie it IS rape if you sabotase birth control

 

Randwolf look up, i found the law (at least for NSW)

 

Depends on the individual person involved. Some people care, others are only interested in what they can get from your daughter's "goods". Best bet is to educate your daughter ahead of time about these dangers. It's not her "responsibility", but at least she can take precautions to lower the chances of her being a victim.

 

Looks like we are back to the sexist lie that only males have any desire for sex.

It is also coupled with the lie that a few drinks is the same thing as being unconcious, especially when all parties involved have had a few drinks.